Thursday, 23 November 2017

Shallow breathing and living charge

I would be inclined to expect unfelt and unconscious shallow breathing to be part of weaker function. With mouth breathing as a sign of lack of energy. What is 'over breathing'?  (Ok I looked it up).
I've recently adopted the 'nitric oxide dump' 4min exercise from Zach Bush (Mercola brought him on stage at some forum recently and I followed him up). Nose breathing is part of its working and chimes with other things I recently met on not mouth breathing.
When the shoe fits - wear it - but chasing 'health' in terms of externals is a reinforcer of a sense of lack.  Breathing is a core fundamental activity that as with so much else can set up a positive or negative reinforcement loop. Is it not all about where we are coming from? A sense of connection lived or a sense of lack in seeking elsewhere.
I don't know a lot about NO  - and if as I do - it will open a lot more that I don't know or perhaps frame me in presuming to know.
But Zach Bush indicates the first 4 mins or so of a persistent exercise release the NO - after which it takes a couple of hours to replenish (?) - and so don't repeat the exercise again too soon. So this is just me repeating what I heard. Stress-triggering NO opens the flow to more regeneration, repair and robustness to the musculature and vasculature. Sounds plausible. Its all about finding your balance in life or perhaps losing it in habit-forms of sleepwalking through it.

If we were regarded as a living battery we would need charge/discharge cycles to maintain and embody polarity charge. Which is that flowing yin-yang embrace of each within the other and both/all within the whole. In our society, a polarized communication breakdown operates both poles against the centre instead of a centred balance point embracing both (all) polarities. A false centrism denies polarity in risk aversion. Loss of balance in alignment generates an action reaction reinforcement that depletes and exhausts the natural desire to support and embrace it. Everything falls apart without a true rythmic balancing of the centre with its field, and the field with its centre. Control is not top down - except as organised disorder trying to pass off as control. Alignment in unified purpose is a true control. In simple terms this is in the felt qualities of our being that seem cliches to their lip service or masking facade - but joy in what we be and do is not complicated though such purpose lived will inevitable meet all the 'complications' we individually and collectively set up to evade, delay or deny presence in reacting to something passing off as true.

Lost heart communication

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/02/08/what-causes-heart-disease-part-iv/#comment-81232


I have read and lived enough to accept that the heart is not the 'pump' it is believed to be, and that that the whole cardiovascular system (no less than any of the body) is literally alive - or enlivened. I also read that there are very thin walls in areas that are presumed to carry huge pressure loads...

I feel that assigning 'evolution' as 'THE truth' is no less prone to the ills blamed on its predecessor - (or worse - for at least a god might change His or Her Mind) - whereas a reverse engineered narrative control - can't be questioned or challenged - 'post truth' is the assertion there is none but the operation of power gained by another's loss or denial.

"Settled Scientific Consensual Edicts and Regulations Save Us from mad heretical dangerous threats and evil terrors" - (truly felt and shared appreciation and participation in living). But the idea of lawful or congruent unfoldment of (any accepted) idea is Logic - and even if presumptions are insane - their logical outcomes proceed unless the predicate is changed. A mindset is a choice-pattern or fixation of 'minding' that seems to be a possession (or possessor?). At least in its time it does.

The idea we humans are out of communication or dissonant and destructive to our own nature, is the development of a 'second nature' that 'killed its predecessor' - as the persistent and defended focus of an overriding assertion of subjective development of need driven learning ability.

The basis of this does not bear close scrutiny - and so the mind looking out simply will not look within - indeed a masking persona is our means by which not to. How else to entrance the human experience? - Which is far more than our animal capacity - as the parent of any developmentally handicapped child knows. The human 'world' is a 'meaning-model' that is held and maintained within consciousness and embodied in cultural, personal and biological expression. But as I indicated, the meanings we accept true logically determine our resulting experience even if magical or wishful thinking - and so we are both teaching idea and learning it - either in a mouth to ear loop of conditioned reaction of with some spark of conscious discernment as to the legitimacy and veracity  - and coherence - of our reality experience.

Wednesday, 22 November 2017

New light on heart health?

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2016/01/25/what-causes-heart-disease-part-iii/


Vincent Nonnenmacher posted


Interesting to see how these ‘specialists’ are prompt to dismiss such long term established empirical ‘wisdom sayings’ as non sense when modern science could try to explain that our own biochemical pathways could use garlic as a backup source of sulfur for deficiency of Cholesterol-sulfate.
There is a very interesting article here :
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456713/#!po=81.1475

Where a lot of clues that our host <Malcolm Kendrick> is seeding along its 3 part wonderful threads are assembled in an intriguing explanation.
It is exactly as a thriller, where all names are cited, even atherom formation, elevated blood pressure and trombosis are exposed not as the culprit but explanation of ways for the body to regulate flow (there is also some explanations on why such difference between arteries and veins due to electromagnetic fields differences due to water conduction and exclusion zone differences between the size and flow conditions).
Fascinating to say the least!



Richly resonating to say the most!

Does not this study most directly address the 'process' or development of incompletely identified prime suspects (atherosclerosis) regarding heart disease? While reasonably challenging more than a few sacred cows - but under a congruent hypothesis of significant accounting for observed experience?

I am already aware of Seneff's and Pollack's work - (and of the establishment antipathy to 'plasma' underpinnings as the Way Things Work - (for it would mark the end of a 'dark matter-ialism) - for its principles are scalable from the Galactic to the intracellular).
 " It's Life Jim - but not as we thought we knew it!"

I appreciate Seneff (and anyone's) willingness to explore the premise of Body as of a wholeness, operating by design to maintain core function under conditions of defficiency or toxicity. This contrasts with our (unconscious) framing in the conditioned narrative presumptions of a flawed, failed or fallen nature, (guilt assigned to weak or failed body/mind), attack, (consequence of guilt), breakdown,in pain and loss, (penalty), and the call to intervene without checking the truth of our perception/belief/experience/reaction.

Interventions may embody 'limited sacrifice' seeking to pre-empt or mitigate greater penalty, heroic rescue, by appeal to magical reassigning of causes and treatments to diversionary focus and procedures - but they can also align with serving the reintegration to health and wholeness in its own terms - rather than in terms of all the king's horses and all the king's men. Many may assign the idea that life has its own innate guidance, support and recovery system as delusional, but that is the result of the idea we can override life to comply and conform to our model of definition, prediction and control ...or fearful defence management. Who is in fact delusional?


As someone who has developed an intuitive discernment in terms of consciousness - I see the same core pattern of belief-protection operating out-from a sense of lack of wholeness defending its image, model or identity against wholeness or health. This predicate running pervasive to our consciousness/worldview and invested self-interest. "Everything is backwards" as the Ellsner quote expands. Perhaps IF we corroborate Seneff's findings as valid - it may help question the way we frame questions.

The history of the suppression, erasure, demonisation via smear, and domination or manipulation of 'consensual' narrative account and belief, can be used a guide to opportunities NOT taken that remain available. But no one can open to consider a view that challenges, undermines or renders obsolete the currently invested identity - and there's the rub. Invested identifications operate as accepted/believed true in place of relational integrity - and wholeness or congruence is relational integrity - that is also 'scalable' as resonant communication.

A false or mis identification, generates negative synergistic reinforcement. Similar in a sense to the adage that a lie calls upon another to keep it hidden until the tares overwhelm the crop... or the harvest gathered in.
And yet the development of a complex subjective (mythic) consciousness upon such identity-reaction maintains psychic-emotional survival within the physical - but at odds with or dissociated from a true appreciation of existence and in a sense, blindly at war with its own good.

The upshot being that we generally get it upside down and back to front as a result of an original error that 'problem solving' obliterates from the possibility of revision. So perhaps it is not an error until we do not want the result it brings. As the song goes - 'some dance to remember, and some dance to forget'. (Hotel California)


Sunday, 19 November 2017

Disease of the heart split off from wholeness

What Causes Heart disease? - a series of posts by Dr Malcolm Kendrick

#1
My reflections began with response to the not unfounded idea that stress causes oxidative inflammation and disease).


Does not the term 'stress' here needs qualifying? - because the sympathetic activation of the nervous system (within healthy function) is accompanied or balanced by the parasympathetic response. They work as one thing, (e.g; stress initiates production of nitric oxide as well as suppressing it). Persistent or chronic stress (via a range of vectors) results in deficiency and/or toxicity and thus a persistent state of inflammation. This leads to dysfunction that then triggers 'backup' or re-routing systems of fulfilling function, that in time becomes adapted as an attempted 'homoeostasis' within 'stressed' (inner and outer) environmental conditions.

The psychic-emotional or 'inner' conditioning' is implicit because our response to any event is the determiner of the meaning we take from it - and thus determines any consequent reaction. Unresolved and unreleased 'conflict' of fight/flight response can and does filter our experience of everything - including attempts to escape stress by inappropriate means that themselves become an inability or refusal to address it directly - such as addictions to masking diversion. In other words much of this runs unconsciously beneath subconscious habits of reaction and belief that find support and reinforcement as social mores and behaviours or indeed regulated medical practice.

But in biological terms; action is a stressor - but also a functional AND meaningful fulfilment of being. If 'functional meaning' is limited or reduced to serve a stress-inducing sense of asserted self-will - rather than aligned and felt meaning - then muscle function is seen to fulfil its purpose as 'work done' toward attaining a goal - but set against some sense of opposition and depletion, and thus as an effort requiring or demanding sacrifice.

But if the term 'functional' is expanded to embrace a felt freedom in wholeness of being - then the embodiment of the true of you knows itself in the act of such movement of being; an act that is aligned or unconflicted with who you feel and know yourself being. In this appreciation 'work done' serves or embodies the meaning of giving and receiving, of a natural sense of belonging - rather than compliance and sufferance under transactional demands of a sense of isolation and limitation or defence.

Dissonance of unsupported isolation and limitation calls for defence, and maps out threat - as an overlaying or filtered awareness of being, re-routing energies and priorities as an autonomic survival reflex, until the conflict is resolved and relaxation re-opens functional presence of re-integration and regeneration.

But if such dissonance persists as unresolved self-conflict, the relaxation, reconnection is effectively blocked by being indefinitely delayed by a mind set in restless or compulsive engagement of attention against genuine relaxation. This survival reflex runs as a masked and masking conditioning - as a subjective sense of managing its 'self or life problem' in terms of maintaining psychic-distantiation and a sense of private or personal defence and control relative a fragmented or 'chaotic; sense of compulsion to "DO something!" in ongoing reinforcement of a narrative identity as the re-enactment of the patterns of its own 'conflict resolution' mask or personality construct.

'Trouble abroad diverts from trouble at home' - and in a sense our 'world' operates a displacement  and diversion from core issues of 'escaped' or 'lidded over' self-conflict. We don't just 'see' what is truly here - but through the filter of our (psychic-emotional) mind-filtering - and suffer it as real while the filtering operates unchallenged as purposes no longer called for or needed.

This surface personality is in a sense, extremely fragile - and thus heavily defended against literally impossible odds - because 'reality control' is impossible (and unnecessary) no matter how charged up the attempt to put such a Humpty together again - however or whoever is flagged up as the scapegoat or bogeyman. Indeed a closed-minded defence against healing perspective is the result of exclusive investment in such a narrative identity that at root, polarizes against a feared, hated, 'enemy' or 'evil'. And it is such deeply conflicted aversion and denial that sets the 'foundation' for a relative sense of self-righteous 'escape' from perceived and believed guilt and fear of profound self conflict.

Any triggering event to the breaking of such 'reality' to the uncovering of otherwise concealed (unconsciously denied) conflict may be experienced as an extreme 'attack' of overwhelmingly traumatic experience. But also to an awakening to the More of what life is - than what we thought and accepted true.


Is our life experience a balanced rhythmic flowing exchange in which psychic-emotional consciousness reflects both a feedback mechanism to our defined object environment - AND a vector through which self-aware recognition automatically aligns the field of its own definitions?

A state of persistent conflict/inflammation, invoking 'backup' strategies of more complex and less efficient systems of fulfiling function (survival) - has a psychic-emotional corollary of 'consciousness' ... as we more or less consensually imagine, define, accept, and operate from as if true. It is hardly a 'blank slate' - but rather a dissociated personality adaptation overlaid upon its original nature. Conflict avoidance becomes parasympathetic dominant and passive-aggressively withdrawn from relations. Conflict expression becomes the blind arrogance of self-righteous assertion upon others - and overrides communication and relationship. The embrace of seemingly polarized conflict is the true nature of being that gives us identity of alignment in unifying and reintegrating purpose. I hold that we have it backwards - putting consciousness as the 'effect' - and yet as we define consciousness it IS an effect. The power to define thus is however the power innate to consciousness - even when running as if unconscious to a sense of life lived independently within its terms.

# 2

Stress also activates nitric oxide production/release as well as limiting it. While generally agreeing with your sketch as a work in progress, I am aware that we mythologize our experience of world and body, or rather, we interpret the world mythically. Perhaps A.I may learn to think as a wholeness instead of trying to put Humpty together again in impossibly complex linear conceptual mappings of variable responding at once to each other?

So I sense Life embodies a communication of balanced functionality that our good v bad 'narrative identity' can only distort. And so I see the good v bad narrative identity as a symptom/reinforcement of a persistently maintained imbalance aka 'define and control mentality' or psychic-emotional defence - as a result of a perceived and believed loss of wholeness of being - and adaptations of persisting under such conditions. This 'development' runs its prodigal course as a dissociation in fragmentation that eventually results in desire for and reintegration within wholeness of being - which is directly Felt Life - rather than emotionally reactive or suppressive mentality operating upon it. The blocks to feeling being - including substitutions  for true presence lived - are both biologically conditioned and psychically reinforced. Does the blood beat the heart? Does environment determine the particulars we see as 'agents' - ie bugs, virii, bacterium, fungi? Is 'environment' merely or exclusively physical or is 'psychic' a pervasive field of informing-information to a tangible expression/experience? Indeed is our consciousness actually the biogenome?
Without it we would have no life in the body - and mitochondria is the intracellular powering of vitally organised bio-electrical and kinetic energy. Why exclude the informational energetic of consciousness?

The consciousness of the personality construct is in many ways a reversal of Consciousness; a cause defined and trapped in its own effect. I see that prematurely opening 'identity in persona' (presumed consciousness) into Consciousness could result in heart failure or psychosis. But I also see that clinging on to outgrown beliefs as a personal sense of 'power' also necessitates 'breakdown' of such a focus or structure in Consciousness.

#3

I cant escape the feeling that the attempt to find the 'cause' in a complex network of symptoms or effects is inadvertently hiding or protecting the cause from exposure by investing in search somewhere else than the realm of Cause.

That is to say - I hold that psychic-emotional conception, filters and distorts a pervasive field of energetic informational communication - (that may facilitate communication breakdown) - relative to its alignment or dissonance in relation to core function.

'Self-inhibiting consciousness' may also be assigned as subjective consciousness can seem to suppress life and seem to step outside it. We can embrace this as its own process of development and discovery, through which consciousness of self and world change as a result of adopting or releasing limiting belief. "It's life Jim, but not as we think we know it".

While science has worked like a demon to exclude consciousness - excepting as some sort of afterthought (an image we are rapidly embodying in robotic compliance to our own beliefs) - it is of course an expression of it. (A self-defeating dead end unless something stirs awake!).

If the yin/yang of sympathetic/parasympathetic function is the key of wholeness or health - then attending to the realignment to wholeness undoes the conditions associating with a state of dysfunctional imbalance. I sense that 'attacking' or suppressing symptoms often works a magic of seeming to work until the result of being further 'attacked' reasserts itself - perhaps in new forms. Don't just do something! Stand there! And react not without pausing what we think we know, enough to be genuinely curious to know.

I sense an aversion to 'simple answers' is when these are assigned support narrative assumptions already aligned with invested or conditioned identity. However that seemingly simple narrative identity investment is an extremely complex psychic-emotional complex with only a 'front end' that seems self-evident as 'the world'.

Not perhaps the kind of conversation that fits a 'medical model' - but that is the nature of the narrative control; it filters to rule-out (as psychological defence) - so as to rule over a subjective experience, and yet becomes subject to its own thoughts believed true. A useful tool, consciously held, or a forgotten consciousness in conditioned reaction.

 I don't see a necessary war between purpose (aligning spirit) and desire (matter to you). But if what matters to us is framed in such a way as to defeat purpose, then complexity confounds the desire as persistent un-fulfilment of core function/nature. Narrative control is a strain and a burden of impossible 'responsibility' because it is the effect of self conflict, seeking causes outside - and be-living them AS testimony to being 'right' or validated over or upon a sense of wrong, projected away.

Wednesday, 15 November 2017

Mitochondrial Health - Reflections

http://anhinternational.org/2017/11/08/mito-mechanics-diy-health-insurance/#comment-6304

Mitochondrial Health (ANH)

I note the effect of near infra red on the (water in the) capilliary blood and intra celluar voltage – is this a significant facet?

Perhaps there already is a website already – but an educative mind-mapping wiki of information bubbles could lend itself a graphical interface by which to visually learn relationships and biochemical pathways of our biology (that also interfaces with environmental factors and psychic-emotional environmental factors). A more relational approach than linear definitional construct.


Psychic-emotional factors are only psychological when studied – and then always through the psychic emotional filters of the ‘student’ or scientist that in turn bring forth psychic-emotional responses in the ‘studied’. So this is much more pervasive and fluctuating than any psychological model would suggest.

We live in consciousness with the notion that we ‘have one’ or are the controller – (or our ‘brain’ is), yet amidst conditions of perceived threat and limitation, that become associated with external conditions rather than the definitional models of our learned reactions – that generate the re-enactment of coded ‘reality’ conditioning.

But I digress – and allow the digression because one of the most powerful healing modalities my be ‘awaiting discovery’ beneath what we think/believe we are. Note that ‘fear-of-other’ defences do the thing they purport to defend against. (Pharma sickness being an obvious example for most reading at ANH). Our attitude to life – and our development of subjective and inventive consciousness has been fear-assertive over an unrecognized dependence on a residual fertility and vitality of love’s being or functional wholeness of being.

In considering health in parts rather than as a wholeness in all its parts, our model of parts, agencies and interactions is already an expression of our own ‘narrative identity’ – ie – a control model. We have no language for wholeness excepting to live it to each other, and have ‘forgotten’ the true of who we integrally are. And yet are not completely lost from the stirring of the desire and willingness to remember. This stirring embodies its awakening through whatever structure or culture of abilities USED TO serve a fear-driven ‘war on symptoms’. And so operates within our world as a broad spectrum Emergence of integration within a deeper honesty of self-responsibility – that ‘narrative control’ interprets as ‘EMERGENCY!’

The ‘Herod syndrome’ is not merely ‘a’ wicked ruler killing innocents – but the fear of loss of control relative to the believed/perceived chaos of loss of control – which is its original birthing as a ‘survival complex’ under extreme threat and conflict.

Humpty Dumpty is an apt symbol of a fragmented chaos over which the ‘king’ is invoked as the enforcer of a narrative continuity – that we identify in thought, as personal or private survival.

But apart from these considerations of the energetic underpinning of our own seemingly split mind/world – I wanted to say that when it comes to health related information, we have little sense of the proportionate dangers or gains even if there is some truth in the information. And as such ‘health’ releated information can in fact be ‘too much inflammation!’, and operate an undermining of health in fear of and obsession with sickness as if pursueing health.

Mainstream propaganda/PR for capturing mindshare does this by design – but other agencies of communication can also succumb to a fear-narrative under wishful or hopeful guise and believing – add credible witness to a deceit. ‘Alt health news’ may bring more sense of positive synergies of thought, behaviour and environment – but with the risk of polarising in a ‘better’ version of the old wine-bottle paradigm.

Navigating the ‘chaotic’ diversity of a seemingly conflicting and competing information explosion is challenging on a number of levels and so most of us give our power and trust to accepted ‘experts’ or perhaps to that which reinforces our wish that something be true. We may then join in bias or succumb to the same errors as are presented true.

Self honesty is something ‘little Herods’ also feel unable to afford or allow – excepting when it fits our filters and support our sense of identity assertion. But we are each and all containing all of the archetypes of story in different mixes and forms – and so the embrace of and reintegration of rejected self, within wholeness of being – is the awakening within a truly unifying purpose.

No part imposing upon the rest can unify. Nor the “1%” under ‘new world order’. Only the awakening of the radiance and presence of love unifies – by recognizing and extending true – rather than seeking and finding what is ‘wrong’ with everyone/everything so as to gain the role of judge or ‘corrector’ or indeed physician/healer.

When our faculties and abilities align within the ‘extension’ or natural radiance of wholeness, the ‘evils of the day thereof’ are brought to light – rather than sacrificing the light to the attempt to fix, overcome or heal them in the form and framing of their presentation.

I associate our gut bionome with the 'Mother' - I also associate their biodiverse 'cooperative with a reflection or embodiment of our psychic-emotional balance and alignment in life. A false sense of neutrality loses the vital charge of life in defending a static or fixed sense of self, in fear of transformation

The lie and the father of the lie - are a misidentification running as a (false) foundation. The lies are symptoms of the nature of their genesis; born in attempt to deny and overlay a mask (or fig leaves) over a feared and shamed 'nakedness'.

All facets of health shine upon all others.

But the 'health' of the masking personae is only supported while its serves the need of the developing consciousness. In this sense the breakdown of the 'ego structure' is not for another or 'better' ego to stamp its order - but as a rebirth in which to feel out and choose to accept what truly resonates and stand in or align in it. This is a 'meekness to Spirit' or purpose that inherits the Living Earth - not as a prodigal runaway 'inheritance to use and use up' but as on ongoing recognition and appreciation for being.

The 'persecution' (or resistance and opposition) to the emergence of a renewed alignment in well-being (personal and cultural) is the condition in which the necessary focus and receptivity is acquired. Or to put in in reverse - is the release of the conditioned mind (or beliefs of automatic and habitual reaction) for a conscious discernment.

Whereas judgement tends to separative and rejecting segregation - discernment is a receptivity to the movement of being - and to the movement within being that is the arising of awareness to its object of affection. Instead of to its objection to affliction. And so when the latter seems to be obstructive to joy in living - pause - and attend to the former so as to re-member the meaning you give and receive.

PS: Do I write into a limited or even lack of attention?

Or do I write into the unified willingness that truly moves me!

Does communication have to be packeted and set off down 'pathways' (internet infrastructure) in search of attention?

Or is the basis of telempathy, the synchronicity of a 'wave' of opening insight, understanding, and the energy of practical support finding practical embodiment?

As a movement grows clearer in its focus, it attracts and aligns a clearer embodiment or reflection. A clarity in which residual dissonance now 'shouts' or stands revealed as 'out of true' to the fulfilment of the shared focus. As I edit this last sentence - I realize this is the mirror reflection to the perceived dissonance of any truth within the frame of narrative control - as the closing quote illustrates:

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”

~ Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives


# 2

I realize that the intent to sketch out felt or intuited qualities of relationship can seem crystal clear to me in the act – and then need re-reading to make its more coherent and readable to anyone else.

In some sense I risk ‘unintelligibility’ in ‘painting’ or giving form to insight – which is firstly a qualitative recognition and not a personal act. Listening BEFORE the mind reacts is a quality of inner undefended trust that I feel as ‘original nature’. But letting the mind serve to give form of expression to a felt life, is in itself a ‘reconfiguring’ of the mind as an instrument rather than in ‘define, predict and control’ of its narrative reality – that we tend to suffer as if true by our own investment in it.

So I apologize for my own liability in engaging this endeavour without fully re-reading and checking the whole before posting. But I also trust that establishing the pathways within myself is by practice, or living it – and that the nature of this grows, expands and becomes more integrated in its expression – in its own timing.

Most everything I write into the attention of a shared willingness is seeking to give articulation to foundation in wholeness of being – as an illumination and freeing from core definitions and beliefs that – in a sense – operate blindly because our own thinking is predicated upon them.

A key recognition is waking or shifting from a conceptually framed ‘identity construct’ to a present appreciation. If any such moment stirs us – then an energetic communication IS shared. The form it takes is not its meaning – but will serve the reintegration of the our sense of self and life to a truly meaningful appreciation.

I have re-edited the post above and will repost it. While you may not ‘understand’, You are the recognizer of how you limit or filter or deny your own help-met, and thus you are the freedom to release what does not now serve who you recognize yourself to be.

If I spoke in terms of what you ‘already know’ (presume), it would serve no other result than you already have. Specific questions attune a response in like kind.

‘Mere mortality’ can be used as a framework to hide in – but what could it hide, or what could it hide from? Is the human condition – as generally accepted – the human conditioning?

Questioning our predicate beliefs is different than living from them as the ‘self-evident reality’ that we have adapted to operating under. I feel such ‘reality’ is in any case ‘disintegrating’ as a narrative identity, and this uncovers a true need to know – a deeper self-honesty and an awakening self-responsibility, as idols or indeed conceptual models, fall.

So what seems philosophical/psychological/spiritual is a framing of information that can pigeon-hole and segregate. Whereas tuning into (noticing and appreciating) what is resonant to your current need to know, or love of true – is in a sense irrespective of its packaging or delivery system.

Systems of assigned meanings are like a shorthand that becomes used without reference to the original and become a basis for further disconnected meanings to likewise cover over in ‘new’ developments of greater dissociation from true relation. Redeeming the currency of our thought, word and therefore deed, is parallel to regaining a currency in true worth.

Taking a sense of worth ‘against’ a perceived or believed evil, enemy or bogeyman is the ‘action-reaction’ of unfaced and un-owned feelings of self lack, that blocks life-energy by attempts to survive under a sense of deprivation, denial, lack and attack. The ‘defence budget’ of our psychic physic and microbiological ‘economy’ is killing us.

The reverse-reading of deceit

https://www.sott.net/article/367690-Someone-in-Russia-sent-some-tweets-Theresa-May-warns-the-entire-Western-world-may-crumble

The reverse-reading of deceit


Ka Wai Awa Awa said:
Do they not know that their accusations against others tells us exactly what they are doing?


Indeed, but the mirror does not blame - it merely reflects.

So what 'they' believe 'they' are doing is revealed in who 'they' think 'they' are - which is 'supported' by polarized diversionary tactic. Who or what is the actual 'doer' or cause? Political intrigue may go down the rabbit holes of shadow powers, but regardless who hides behind deceits, is not the baiting of the mind, its 'capture' as an asset or proxy to work another agenda even while believing it is fulfilling some sense of self-specialness or divine calling - that may degrade and fragment to holding the line against 'feared or hated outcome'?

When you say 'they' do you mean the captured mind that knows not what it does, the terrorized mind that does what it is told, the denied mind that does anything to not know, and etc?

Weaponizing information is deceit - such as to infer an 'us and them' in narrative conflict. Deceits can be illuminated, as deceits or without substance or foundation in truth. I like your comment - and the question in it is perhaps answered 'no, they cannot or dare not see or look within'. Exactly how the mind is structured to fixate in dissociated displacement of its own fear is different in form for each. But by such a world is our 'Soul' awareness covered over.

To a deceit-thief, a world of treachery insinuates beneath appearances - a world which is feared to rise and take back the 'power' it presumes to itself in vengeance and exposure to self-lack or nakedness.

What happens when we stop using the 'evil' or blame of such 'others' to assert and validate our own presumption to judge and attack or deny them?

'Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do' is the release of the thoughts supporting a false sense of power - within whose frame, is mind used for attack in place of communication. And so a world of attack seems 'honest' and a world of love seems weak and open to predation over - as a protection racket.

The alignment under such power gives itself away by its manipulative presentation as puppets of a scripted narrative control. Or to put it another way of scripted and manipulated identities. Within one's bubble, it may seem one is making choices'. But all is filtered through the script of a shadow power - because, brought to light of true awareness, its claim to power would be undone.
Fear not the shadow, but be vigilant to the baiting of a baiting of reactive blindness. And use the recognition of the ruse to reclaim conscious alignment in a quality of communication and not a presentation attempting to make up for the lack of such quality.

World events can be read as divine illuminations of how we have chosen to use our mind or what we have chosen to give allegiance to and for what. The revealing of choice at the level of creative reconnection is freedom to choose again, rather than persist in what may be called a 'miscreative' use of the mind; of intention, attention, desire and fulfilment. Negative fulfilments are scientifically valid feedback to the basis of the 'question' asked and the 'answers' found.

The power of a wish is of capturing the willingness to persist in focusing there. An untruth, to persist must be protected at truth's expense. Perhaps it begins with a private sense of exclusion against interference, a mapping out and filtering by which to bring an image to 'life' or assign fantasy associations and make them stick. But what then goes forth to multiply itself is division, conflict and loss - (Humpty Dumpty) under the tyranny of narrative control (... and all the king's men) that would - if it could - abide in darkness, or operate under plausible deniability.

Deceits are protected from light be the 'personae' of blame redistribution. But in light - the demand for sacrifice of true and blame-assignment and 'justification' is released of whatever sense or necessity it seemed to hold in the shadow. But, the very means by which 'power' operates in the world of the sleeping, is the double edged sword above their own head.

Protection rackets can also 'protect' from exposure, any publicity that would end a career or indeed confer a worse penalty. Those who influence the decisions of any import want to back people they can trust to be compliant in key matters of scripting outcomes that consolidate 'power' as the replacement of life. The wish usurps the true will. Or does it?

In similar vein:

https://www.sott.net/article/367795-EU-signs-historic-deal-to-integrate-23-armies-to-shake-off-its-US-dependence-or-an-attempt-to-intimidate-Russia

SOTT Comment: So is it actually 'shaking off' dependence on the psychopathic warmongers in the US or is it just another US proxy army this time in Europe??

Is not the "USA" a proxy to the 'United' State of a global agenda?

Is the 'globalist agenda' the driving power or the uprising powerlessness?

Is the global possession and control of wealth, bankruptcy?

Is narrative control the desperate shoring up or tyrannous assertion of 'necessary' illusions?

When the tares are so grown in with the roots of the crop, are they 'Too big (in terms of feared outcome) to be allowed to fail? Or is a parasitic usurping of our true being generating the conditions of its own demise, partly through the destruction of its host - but actually through the termination of the hosting service by aligning in true - despite the feared outcome?

Monday, 13 November 2017

Control of urges

Australian imam says women need to wear the hijab because men can't control their sexual urges

Originally and article in the Daily Mail I met it on SOTT and commented also into the emotional reactivity of commenting there. I don't recommend the article - but this theme is a key area of awakening responsibility on whatever level.


Control of urges.

When anyone or anything 'presses my buttons' is it their act or choice (intended or otherwise) that causes my reaction?
Or is my experience my co-creative responsibility and power?
If blame appeals as the way to disempower or block 'denied, hated, or feared communications or exposures - then the wish to take offence hides in the mask of the righteously wronged.

The social construct for the censoring, filtering and suppression of urges is our upbringing - both conditioning of direct learning experience - and inducted and imposed family and social mores and rules.

The blaming of women for triggering desire in men is the giving away of power by men.
The 'self-confessed weakness' of men is passed off as if a fact - albeit assigned to 'other' weaker men than the one who acts the apologist for giving way to fantasy thoughts.
Not that triggers cannot be activated by design as manipulative deceit. For manipulating deceit is the nature of corrupted human thinking and society. But that given acceptance as true, any deceit spreads and propagates to rob a wholeness of being - and relations. Because of such insight - the attempt to punish special forms of deceit - as evil - if to protect - and be The Protector - of the Sanctity of Life - teaches fear of 'evil' and delivers us unto 'evil' - while under the belief or mask of attempting self-righteousness - or correctness - relative to our personal and social setting.

Yet there is one thing that aligns us true - that no amount of 'self-control' can ever achieve - and that is the honouring of Another as our Self. Those who are convicted in self-unworthiness cannot or will not see a true worth in Another - excepting a conditional acceptance within accepted forms of conduct or appearance. The breaking of such 'rules' or demands meeting withdrawal of 'love' and triggering of hate.

No amount of blaming and targeting will ever put wholeness together again. Regardless how intensely the wish to deny, exclude and reject the hated or feared or shaming. But we are created in wholeness as the urge of the desire and willingness to live. And while this holds the 'survival' urge within itself - it is not merely the urge to survive, mate and compete for survival and mating.

The suppression of our true desire to know and be known operates the false or masked sense of getting from - and of course 'getting away from'. The 'Paradise' symbol for many men is the woman - whose archetype is deeper than the thinking personality level. But Paradise is the feint memory of lost wholeness in a world of false and fought over substitutions. Resisting the temptation to act out fantasy scripts on others - even in thought - is the cultivation of mindfulness or free awareness in which to discern true relation in place of triggered dissociation.

The fragmentation of the personality construct is socially enforced as narrative control but generally experienced as an incoherent and conflicted world. Narrative identity is the 'tyranny' of unchallenged thinking that runs human beings as conditioned reaction without free awareness in which to discern love's recognition. While the narrative identity is fed and supported in a role of self-specialness - it runs as a blind-spot to its own thought, act and deed - because it is acting out fantasy gratification for a sense of self-lack being vindicated and compensated for.

Psychology has tended to follow the dissociations of the 'scientific' analysis - with its own blind-spot from which fantasy treatment subjects those in need to further reinforcements of self-lack and sickness. Psychic-emotional relationship is awake within as free attention and awareness - in a shared appreciation of reality. For we always co-create our interaction and experience - whether that is an aligned and shared appreciation or a conflicted and conflicted sense of negative appreciation of hate, blame, fear and defence.

Thank You for your attention.