For every action is there an equal and opposite reaction?
For every action is there an equal and opposite reaction?
Of all the qualifiers to this topic, i add that what we truly teach is always by example. Where thought word and deed align, we model freedom of aligned purpose.
Where what we say conflicts with what we are seen to do, we teach dissociation of a split allegiance.
Children are free, just as we are free, but are already in a learned world of mostly tacit masking agreements or rules by which to 'survive; inner and outer conflicts.
I mentioned Marshal Rosenberg in comments already as an example of uncovering broken communication to a freedom of real relationship.
the 'abused' do not always know they reiterate their own patterns - even in the attempt to make sure that they dont! Children can be used to justify or validate our own sense of lack or deprivation AND buy into it as a love that has yet to identify clearly in human responsibility.
Liberty is set against slavery, but freedom is a gift of our being.
That we can override or deny our being is itself part a freedom to choose rather than mechanically and mindlessly obey. Hence even at personal level a freedom to recognise and align rather than be tooled blind.
Polarities seen as separate and exclusive will reinforce each other as two sides of one (hidden) thing.
The tension and release of a charged condition can be and is used to drive the engine of lack-driven sense of control that cannot exist as a monopole because there is no singularity at the level of the body/world.
We learn by teaching. Not by modelling in search of funding for applications that turn out to be unworkable but so invested in as to be 'protected narratives'.
The current time is taking the experience of reversal or inversion to it tipping point. The unworkable in truth cannot be 'sustainable' or offer a foundation for future development. No matter how much the invested identity is masked in 'sustainability' as a code word for sacrifice to its blind god.
Joy in being is not 'selfish' but shine of itself - unselfconsciously - through our doings. Others are touched or reminded as they are open to receive. Again this can be unselfconscious. Likewise honesty in the way we seek to resolve conflicts.
Spirituality does not wait on any conceptual 'understanding and application' relative to problem-solving, and often comes in when we forget to struggle or force answer in our terms.
Artifice to Art is a modelling or copy that lacks qualities of being or perhaps adulterates and dilutes to a degraded derivative substitute for being set in image and form. Ergo : ego.
Art as "To Be'.
Thou Art that That!
Our creative expression as being is then masked and filtered to a mindset of levels of self-definition - from which are our 'results'.
Self defined in lack generates an abundance of lack, because that which goes forth to multiply is based in and expressive of its foundation.
A split mind seems then to split our foundation, or source, to the experience of a driven destiny that reiterates or resets itself in the very attempt to 'complete'.
But WHO told you you were naked? (or lacking or susceptible to fear and threat).
The masking mind is set in concepts that are derivative to a currency of symbol that is derivative to an original association beneath a complex of what has become 'dead' structure.
Living relationship is the art of being, but not without patterns that serve and embody or express that shared worth, value or appreciation.
The substitution of artifice is where the mind interjects a masking in virtue or alignment to a social ideal or acceptance and becomes accepted currency. Hence the ideal of cooperative must recognise the patterns that 'use' others to take leadership roles and then 'use' them as scapegoats or blameworthy for failing to support our ego of expectations.
However I recognise spontaneous order as the Natural underlying Fact or Synchronicity, that we are all adept in masking as a broken and displaced self and world, in which misalignments or imbalance and dissonance may seem to frame and drive existence as some kind of machine of death (if looked at beneath the bonnet).
I was originally going to recommend a perhaps unusual source of succinct wisdom that in my view addresses your worthy questions and observations.
You know when you are operating free willingly or under a coercive sense of struggle. But there are times when you choose not to know, such as if your freedom to persist in an invested identification is 'threatened' by change that has associations in pain of loss.
Regardless 'most people' you are your own field of responsibility as your part within a greater whole that is far more than any quantum of parts. My sense is that neglected responsibility generates crisis, that can be 'parked out' in time and space, temporarily, but as increasing burden of death and taxes.
That which is truly First has been put off to last, as result of exploring experience of limitation, division, and rules given priority.
Breakdown of structure can be seen as death and destruction from identity in form, but as a spiritual expression of being, releases old habits to allow seeding renewal. You may say how do we do that, and I say how can you do anything else and truly live? For what we do is not the driver of reality but our own integration of what we have lived and learned or accepted as being (true of us).
I highly recommend looking at Marshal Rosenberg on a video of him at work as an exemplar of a way of enabling (real) communication.
That he founded the NVC (nonviolent communication) movement is not in itself the point nor should be pigeonholed as any kind of conflict-evasion masking (which is the old wine paradigm of masked and coded avoidance). I got one of his pamphlets called Raising Children Compassionately to find it was mostly transcripts of workshops I had seen.
Language, Word and Result in perceptual responses is at the very heart of the complex conflicts that play out as be-lived broken ‘realities’.
My smartass teenage neighbor was here as I was watching this video and said if it was a comic book I’d buy it, food for thought.
You can run it through a filter and play with the voices.
The tiny and diminishing attention span is a lock down against the vibrational qualities of living.
My sense is that where there is a willingness, there will be a way of finding and being found that meets us where we are, including comic books.
Those who are attracted to explore comic as vehicle for metacommunications (wonder and expanded appreciation for existence) are fulfilled and in a sense attracted by the need met.
Giving set in material terms is a very limiting concept - as if giving is only to get - even if for others or a society.
Holding the quality of inner joy is a natural radiance of being that gives of itself.
Much of the drama and struggle of attempts to prove or become something fall away to a quality of self-acceptance. Old patterns come up to be released instead of wasting the day at hand.
I have lived an unfolding of experience that is richer than anything I could have planned - and am still here.
What can we truly give?
The gift of freedom is that of bringing our true presence to our relationships, which both gives and receives in like kind. That we are trained to contract to relations of masking distance is both an inner and outer measure of our current acceptance.
Awareness is being, and true vigilance is not set by a past made in grievance, but as a current responsibility for integrity of being. For this, release of the past is needed - else its boot-print stamps on the present as a means to a future like itself.
Releasing our USE of the past, of others or the body or the world, allows true function to resume of itself as awareness of being. But while we would use Life as a means to GET for a separate self-sense, we cannot recognise ourself in others, in Life and World or in fact in our self.
Alienation is the result of distancing, masking and acting out inner conflict on an outer world.
Disclosure of an alien agenda is not what we think we think, but is what we think we think alone - albeit in lockstep of mutually reinforcing definitions and beliefs.
The Script for Separation runs division, conflict, pain and loss - set in struggle.
The Awakening Script is the undoing of what never was to what Always is. This makes no sense to identity in time, excepting where it heals and releases from what we believed real and suffered grievously under attempt to escape or overcome.
It isn't that we declare illusions unreal and claim righteousness, but that we stop investing in what we believe they give us, so as to open new ways of seeing.
Where two or more resonate in shared with-ness, is a Field.
Loves do not finally meet.
They were in each other all along.
yes the mask can be seductive and grotesque.
But are we the result of our story?
Or the fruit of a giving in which we were never truly alone?
Mike Yeadon in summary:
(On comments to that the 'virus' is a false narrative or unreal in terms of actual science).
Rhys Jaggar Reply to mgeo
How do you ‘spread the spike protein’ if it is not part of a virus?
You can’t. You can only spread infectious agents, you could give mass exposures of liposomes containing spike protein, I guess.
But you can’t spread spike protein between people if there isn’t an infectious agent doing the spreading.
I have never come across a virus in biological terms.
I have experienced periods of sickness that may serve positive function despite discomfort and fear - or because of such - which an elitist priesthood assigns to a 'virus' that is intrinsically associated with official dia-gnosis and treatment regimes™.
Shock also starts as an spike that then (if not re-triggered) calms down to a more practical relational response.
We largely don't realise that we package fear to narratives, myths and meanings that internally structure subsequent perception and response, such that a state of fear can be a 'normal' running.
I see nanotech being made in labs, that is combined with hydrogels and proteins.
There is a particular snip from latest Kaufman and Cowan that shows Defence imperatives for such tech overriding all else...
I don't promote fear, so much as recognising internal or hidden structures or devices that both feed fear and feed on it.
Mythic or narrative interpretations that become a basis for application and funding are a large part of all technologised science and so I agree that the propensity to 'understand' or interpret through an already fooled mind is easier that to question our mind-in-the-act of its persistence through a new perspective.
Virology reveals a false basis in projections of fear to external agents in the belief of susceptibility to such agents, calling for armour and intervention. Hence a new 'church of allopathy' set on eradicating 'germs' (life).
Genetics feels very much to me to be a shifted investment of such 'wish for the role of control' that is no less founded in artefacts of its own seeking. The model is wrong and reflects the mind of its proponents/investment and not biotic reality.
Cellular field interactions and dynamics is the bio-electromagnetic appreciation of life - even to the abiotic structures of which and through which we experience coherent perspective (and dissonance).
The mythic or image-based self is set in weaponising and marketising its domain as an expression of possession and control, because such identity operates dispossession from awareness of the Embracing Field of Communication that is of a different Order to 'control' as a synchrony.
The nanotechological intervention to the interface with EMR represents the persistence of the 'ego' of acknowledging ONLY that which is utilised for its function - which effects a blocking signal to Communication, such as to generate a realm of 'control' distanced from and locked down to lockstep in a filtered and distorted weaponisation of communication, set as narrative dictate or mythic 'creation' through which to lens an experience of private thought and communication in alignment with others under lack-driven control as the basis of life in a body or object universe of things seeking external fulfilment under external threat - ie struggle, pain and death.
The belief in the body as distance and lockdown in survival runs contra to the capacity of Consciousness to attune to the Field. Such belief will operate to deny, distort and pervert a Field Recognition as if its own extinction. But a belief is in the mind of its believer and never truly in the externalised modelling of such a psychic survival. Recognising beliefs released Reality to be Itself, as Self-Revealing.
The original impulse of this post was invite awareness of the framing of invested 'control' as the as yet largely hidden great investment hope of the 'stakeholders' who must include those aligned in the same mindshare as apparent opposition.
Insofar as evils are recognised, they need be looked on and not used to generate a mask of virtue over hatred locked in thereby. New choices replace old habits in freedom. The model of destruction as the means of change is a mindset in denial, that then does as was done by, but knowing not what it does.
Alignment in the Field of being rises of itself from the recognition /release of what no longer belongs or serves purpose to a Current appreciation of integral Reality, as distinct from a mind modelling given priority and left running.