Wednesday, 21 July 2021

Propaganda and Deceit as crash course in Awakening Freedom

For every action is there an equal and opposite reaction?

I see propaganda as deceit to be neutered.

Such as to remain a gift unreceived and left in the mind of its giver.

We may think you are free because of your thoughts about it but if we adopt the phrasing and language we indicate otherwise.

It is possible to use a deceivers terms against their own case but in all respects we have to become aware of our own back doors - which are always some sort of emotional reaction - even to images or symbols.

If you leave your mind unwatched you leave it open to being robbed.

After awakening responsibility for diet, so as to check the poison, the next responsibility alongside is the thought, word and deed we give our world, for by this are we set and not by 'them'. The meanings we give are often forms of inherited or acquired social masking that are internalised or 'normal' as our perception of reality. hence we are only 'free' to respond within the rules and filtering of such beliefs.

Instead of reactive defence, is a proactive vigilance for wholeness or unconflicted being - such as to grow awareness for the triggers by which we override or deny awareness for a sense of control or saving face in our own eyes of to others.

Awareness is not a commodity to leverage and focus for impact except we so will it and set it so. The field of awareness extends beyond the limits of the locked down mind of a physically distanced and masking sense of self and responds to true desire in ways that cannot be accounted for in linear terms of cause and effect.

There is a way of using the mind of a deceiving reversal - which is to learn to always read it in reversal and learn by what it doesn't say or report or by what it censors as well as the characteristic projection and ascribing of its own intentions to others.

The nature or resonant connection is non-local and where there is a correspondence, there is something in me that is resonating - and therefore available to act from or align in or see as an offer to decline - as in thanks but no thanks.

Demonising denial seeks to get rid of rather than release, and this actually sets a connection, for what we deny in ourself is part of our wholeness. the way to stop receiving something is to stop giving it rather than to 'give it' in a masked intent to 'dump it to others.

Owning only what is mine is the freedom to release what isnt.

This applies to the dimensions above.

We carry all kinds of patterns of conflict and guilt for others - and the mechanism or device for this as a manipulation is becoming clearer to most here, and its result is a social masking in virtue or acceptability and respectability relative to image, form and behaviour.

Owning our own business is to be lawful in our relationships and endeavour to living beings. To take on what is given or revealed in me as the movement of my being is freedom to be me. the temptation to 'augment' a sense of lack or fear with boosters, armouring, or weapons, is to lock the fear in, and become tooled by what is taken in as extensions of identity.

All the above is simply responsibility for living that could be called 'spiritual' because its purpose is unifying and integrative rather than divisive and segregative or conflicted.

That the circumstances are making NOT accepting such responsibility for ourselves and our relationship and communication untenable, is shifting the scales from fear of past trauma set as strategies of a 'devil we know' (or rather knew how to mask over and distance from), to the fear of the Unknown - that is a release of who and what we made our self and world in judgements, to a willingness to learn of life and each other anew.

The concept of tipping point also applies to where fear is so pervasive even if following the 'self-protective' face of fear as control, that its offer is seen to cost more than it promises to give - but only as a temporary sense of existence that always demands more sacrifice.

To many this communication however offered or extended, will not find reception.

The call to joy or wholeness is weak in those who heed the call to war, and resolve to take joy in justified hate.

My Nan used to say, be careful the wind doesn't change and leave you stuck with the faces we sometimes made as kids. the Wind of fundamental change IS moving through all that we live, and so who we accept and choose to be is critical to who and what we ARE choosing - even if under the RUSE of being forced to, gaslighted or tricked.

Loving truth because only truth is true is release of loving self-illusion as substitution for truth, that by its nature is set against or at odds with 'what is'.

There seems to be a war between truth and illusions, but truly, illusions battle only with themselves. It should be obvious that an illusion accepted true can evoke destructive and tragic results. I don't regard what the mind makes as without power, but if it isn't true it has only the power we give it - but not less.

To see this in its negative or self- conflicting expression is to recognise the freedom to give and receive differently, instead of persisting the same patterns of behaviour as if 'this time' it will make a difference.

Teaching Children Freedom 

Of all the qualifiers to this topic, i add that what we truly teach is always by example. Where thought word and deed align, we model freedom of aligned purpose.

Where what we say conflicts with what we are seen to do, we teach dissociation of a split allegiance.

Children are free, just as we are free, but are already in a learned world of mostly tacit masking agreements or rules by which to 'survive; inner and outer conflicts.

I mentioned Marshal Rosenberg in comments already as an example of uncovering broken communication to a freedom of real relationship.

the 'abused' do not always know they reiterate their own patterns - even in the attempt to make sure that they dont! Children can be used to justify or validate our own sense of lack or deprivation AND buy into it as a love that has yet to identify clearly in human responsibility.

Liberty is set against slavery, but freedom is a gift of our being.

That we can override or deny our being is itself part a freedom to choose rather than mechanically and mindlessly obey. Hence even at personal level a freedom to recognise and align rather than be tooled blind.

Polarities seen as separate and exclusive will reinforce each other as two sides of one (hidden) thing.

The tension and release of a charged condition can be and is used to drive the engine of lack-driven sense of control that cannot exist as a monopole because there is no singularity at the level of the body/world.

We learn by teaching. Not by modelling in search of funding for applications that turn out to be unworkable but so invested in as to be 'protected narratives'.

The current time is taking the experience of reversal or inversion to it tipping point. The unworkable in truth cannot be 'sustainable' or offer a foundation for future development. No matter how much the invested identity is masked in 'sustainability' as a code word for sacrifice to its blind god.

Joy in being is not 'selfish' but shine of itself - unselfconsciously - through our doings. Others are touched or reminded as they are open to receive. Again this can be unselfconscious. Likewise honesty in the way we seek to resolve conflicts. 

Spirituality does not wait on any conceptual 'understanding and application' relative to problem-solving, and often comes in when we forget to struggle or force answer in our terms.


Artifice to Art is a modelling or copy that lacks qualities of being or perhaps adulterates and dilutes to a degraded derivative substitute for being set in  image and form. Ergo : ego.

Art as "To Be'.

Thou Art that That!

Our creative expression as being is then masked and filtered to a mindset of levels of self-definition - from which are our 'results'.

Self defined in lack generates an abundance of lack, because that which goes forth to multiply is based in and expressive of its foundation.

A split mind seems then to split our foundation, or source, to the experience of a driven destiny that reiterates or resets itself in the very attempt to 'complete'.

But WHO told you you were naked? (or lacking or susceptible to fear and threat).

The masking mind is set in concepts that are derivative to a currency of symbol that is derivative to an original association beneath a complex of what has become 'dead' structure.

Living relationship is the art of being, but not without patterns that serve and embody or express that shared worth, value or appreciation.

The substitution of artifice is where the mind interjects a masking in virtue or alignment to a social ideal or acceptance and becomes accepted currency. Hence the ideal of cooperative must recognise the patterns that 'use' others to take leadership roles and then 'use' them as scapegoats or blameworthy for failing to support our ego of expectations.

However I recognise spontaneous order as the Natural underlying Fact or Synchronicity, that we are all adept in masking as a broken and displaced self and world, in which misalignments or imbalance and dissonance may seem to frame and drive existence as some kind of machine of death (if looked at beneath the bonnet).

I was originally going to recommend a perhaps unusual source of succinct wisdom that in my view addresses your worthy questions and observations.

You know when you are operating free willingly or under a coercive sense of struggle. But there are times when you choose not to know, such as if your freedom to persist in an invested identification is 'threatened' by change that has associations in pain of loss.

Regardless 'most people' you are your own field of responsibility as your part within a greater whole that is far more than any quantum of parts. My sense is that neglected responsibility generates crisis, that can be 'parked out' in time and space, temporarily, but as increasing burden of death and taxes.

That which is truly First has been put off to last, as result of exploring experience of limitation, division, and rules given priority.

Breakdown of structure can be seen as death and destruction from identity in form, but as a spiritual expression of being, releases old habits to allow seeding renewal. You may say how do we do that, and I say how can you do anything else and truly live? For what we do is not the driver of reality but our own integration of what we have lived and learned or accepted as being (true of us).


I highly recommend looking at Marshal Rosenberg on a video of him at work as an exemplar of a way of enabling (real) communication.

That he founded the NVC (nonviolent communication) movement is not in itself the point nor should be pigeonholed as any kind of conflict-evasion masking (which is the old wine paradigm of masked and coded avoidance). I got one of his pamphlets called Raising Children Compassionately to find it was mostly transcripts of workshops I had seen.

Language, Word and Result in perceptual responses is at the very heart of the complex conflicts that play out as be-lived broken ‘realities’.


A57 says:

My smartass teenage neighbor was here as I was watching this video and said if it was a comic book I’d buy it, food for thought.

You can run it through a filter and play with the voices.

The tiny and diminishing attention span is a lock down against the vibrational qualities of living.

My sense is that where there is a willingness, there will be a way of finding and being found that meets us where we are, including comic books.

Those who are attracted to explore comic as vehicle for metacommunications (wonder and expanded appreciation for existence) are fulfilled and in a sense attracted by the need met.

Monday, 19 July 2021

Giving by Nature

Giving set in material terms is a very limiting concept - as if giving is only to get - even if for others or a society.

Holding the quality of inner joy is a natural radiance of being that gives of itself.

Much of the drama and struggle of attempts to prove or become something fall away to a quality of self-acceptance. Old patterns come up to be released instead of wasting the day at hand.

I have lived an unfolding of experience that is richer than anything I could have planned - and am still here.

What can we truly give?

The gift of freedom is that of bringing our true presence to our relationships, which both gives and receives in like kind. That we are trained to contract to relations of masking distance is both an inner and outer measure of our current acceptance.

Awareness is being, and true vigilance is not set by a past made in grievance, but as a current responsibility for integrity of being. For this, release of the past is needed - else its boot-print stamps on the present as a means to a future like itself.

Releasing our USE of the past, of others or the body or the world, allows true function to resume of itself as awareness of being. But while we would use Life as a means to GET for a separate self-sense, we cannot recognise ourself in others, in Life and World or in fact in our self.

Alienation is the result of distancing, masking and acting out inner conflict on an outer world.

Disclosure of an alien agenda is not what we think we think, but is what we think we think alone - albeit in lockstep of mutually reinforcing definitions and beliefs.

The Script for Separation runs division, conflict, pain and loss - set in struggle.

The Awakening Script is the undoing of what never was to what Always is. This makes no sense to identity in time, excepting where it heals and releases from what we believed real and suffered grievously under attempt to escape or overcome.

It isn't that we declare illusions unreal and claim righteousness, but that we stop investing in what we believe they give us, so as to open new ways of seeing.

Where two or more resonate in shared with-ness, is a Field.

Loves do not finally meet.

They were in each other all along.

yes the mask can be seductive and grotesque.

But are we the result of our story?

Or the fruit of a giving in which we were never truly alone?

Fear invested in the narrative HAS a basis in each mind that gives it

Mike Yeadon in summary:

(On comments to that the 'virus' is a false narrative or unreal in terms of actual science).

But the fear invested in the narrative HAS a basis in each mind that gives it.

And the narrative serves as a form of threat of Disclosure, repackaged to a cover story by which to mask as control under sacrifice set as virtue and necessity.

Such is the 'self' we made in lockstep; the face we protect and the control we limit to, as lord and protector of a realm we think to rule alone, yet suffer to struggle in fear of loss seeking cover story to offset pain. make it go away, get rid of it and redefine life as pain so as to set the mind in fantasy of such diversion to make or take 'joy' in pain.

Engaging with the story, feeds the story. In some ways Mike Yeadon is coming to the primary fact of the weaponised lie as a Call to disinvest it - though he still wants to fight it at some level, which is understandable as reaction but it is by reaction we invest identity.

There is a story we can engage in, as a willingness for truth BECAUSE it is true.

The revealing and reintegrating to being, from invested identity in models serving unrecognised and unowned fear, that have become system capture and mind capture.

When we give meaning to external situations, we give power away.

But a true enquiry to externally shared experience of world, uncovers a lack of substance to an invested image, model or myth of existence, such as to make way for a Self-Revealing that realigns and reintegrates to wholeness of being.

Any attempt to fit the freedom and gift of wholeness of being to a world of division, limitation and struggle, becomes framed and fitted to such a mindset, agenda, or system of adaptation to such a persistent and defended habit.

I felt no call for rational or scientific involvement when the Media began its campaign of terror as the alt glove to a pretence of political process. Being lied to, threatened, coerced or bullied is not requiring a degree to recognise. Except we are raised and trained to expect and accept this as social conditioning that runs as invisible or normal for the most part, until raised to priority and visibility over all else - as a primary survival threat.

Regardless the facts, the psychic-emotional masking that is triggered, operates as a dissociated reality adjustment or displacement, for those who know not what they do under identification in fear, division, and conflicted dis-connection running as the attempt to repeat the problem as if THIS time it will solve.

Fear recognised is the Call to love. To truth, to sanity of alignment in integrity of being. That we may shit ourself is not just physicalised, but the releasing of what we made in fear. Because the old shit was our normal, does not mean we need it back. But nor is it our part to attack shit as if to remodel it into a tighter masking and control system.

The attempt to usurp the Spirit is a signature characteristic of mis-taken identity given power of energy, attention and intention. Recognising the pattern is key to nipping reaction in the bud, rather than some time later wondering what really happened or what was that really about.

To know what we do is to be unconflicted in purpose, and to watch the mind and emotion in the body is to own our experience, rather than cast out and suffer our own spell.


Rhys Jaggar Reply to  mgeo

How do you ‘spread the spike protein’ if it is not part of a virus?

You can’t. You can only spread infectious agents, you could give mass exposures of liposomes containing spike protein, I guess.

But you can’t spread spike protein between people if there isn’t an infectious agent doing the spreading.

Yes. Narrative investments as a train of thought given rails to run on, can spread endless variants of false assumptions or indeed false flag assignment.

The S-protein as spiked, looks to be a synthetic product for the genetic investment bubble that claims so much and delivers ... what exactly?

But as a leveraging narrative, offers gain of function in terms of a cover by which to engage war on life where it is - Bio-electromagnetically, rather than as virionic or genetic models of masking diversion, distance and denial of the Field in which and of which we are Experiencing Existence.

There is Communication a priori to the mind of rules and filters by which we imagine, model and set our 'world'. But it's closer than our face.

So it is not just possible we influence each other, but factual we are part of each other in ways that are under the radar of an object reality.

I recognised the logic to your point through a like quality.

Such qualities are not our personal claim but without them, all is hollow and mechanical or artificial and dead - even with Life all around and about us.


Rhys Jaggar reply to hotscot:

I’ve yet to come across a ‘deadly virus’ that doesn’t mutate into a more infectious-, less deadly one in the wild. The limitations of ‘deadly viruses’ made in labs is that they may be initially very deadly, but they become ever less so if you want the virus to spread through a population…..

I have never come across a virus in biological terms.

I have experienced periods of sickness that may serve positive function despite discomfort and fear - or because of such - which an elitist priesthood assigns to a 'virus' that is intrinsically associated with official dia-gnosis and treatment regimes™.

Shock also starts as an spike that then (if not re-triggered) calms down to a more practical relational response.

We largely don't realise that we package fear to narratives, myths and meanings that internally structure subsequent perception and response, such that a state of fear can be a 'normal' running.

I see nanotech being made in labs, that is combined with hydrogels and proteins.

There is a particular snip from latest Kaufman and Cowan that shows Defence imperatives for such tech overriding all else...

I don't promote fear, so much as recognising internal or hidden structures or devices that both feed fear and feed on it.


Any Identity of investment in establishment operates within its parameters UNLESS recanting or releasing of their training/conditioning.

I see Yeadon is open to questioning 'virus', nanotech, etc but focuses in simple basic human understanding of fraud, deceit and criminally destructive behaviours operating under corrupt institutional capture. He is glad that others are questioning and researching these other facets. I expect he feels his establishment credentials and loss of peer inclusion as a result of being outspoken, are worth something in the minds of many who are less certain of their own ability to navigate and integrate a mess of disinformation, and so feels useful where he is in that section of people. If he got involved in openly refuting some claims that are considered settled science but are dogma and mind-control, he would lose his place for many, even if bring a few within him. At least that is my sense. But he has to live with himself. Not with your or my opinions. I go a lot further in my reading of what is happening but I have a deep appreciation for his human witness or living from integrity - which is the only way to grow such awareness and integration.

Montagnier accepted a nobel.



He never did isolate an HIV virus or establish causality of such. (much less the Gov-puppet Gallo).

He did allow his research to be used to establish a billion-dollar narrative control operation that remains largely in place though modified as part of the ongoing global institutional capture.

He has done very interesting work on water memory.

There is wheat among the tares.

Bossche is inserted to the script as a heave promotion of virus fear as real - but assigned to the so called variants that he associates with genetic mutation rather than various results of 're-alignment' as practiced in software to determin a Humpty from millions of pieces of RNA fragments of indeterminate stuff that is 'CALLED" isolation, just as a cold and flu season is called 'pandemic' or meaningless test results are called 'cases'. Bossche is also heavily promoting the new Genetic world order/control system. So he represents perhaps a minor turf war in terms of who gets to eat the most oysters (Lewis Carrol ref). very heavily set within the system and from what I saw just another brick in the wall.

If you or anyone feel something missing or misrepresented, say so. I share my current sense as part of my own reintegration, not as an intent to impact or shape opinions.

Sunday, 18 July 2021

Narrative interpretations as basis for application & funding technologised science

 Mythic or narrative interpretations that become a basis for application and funding are a large part of all technologised science and so I agree that the propensity to 'understand' or interpret through an already fooled mind is easier that to question our mind-in-the-act of its persistence through a new perspective.

Virology reveals a false basis in projections of fear to external agents in the belief of susceptibility to such agents, calling for armour and intervention. Hence a new 'church of allopathy' set on eradicating 'germs' (life).

Genetics feels very much to me to be a shifted investment of such 'wish for the role of control' that is no less founded in artefacts of its own seeking. The model is wrong and reflects the mind of its proponents/investment and not biotic reality.

Cellular field interactions and dynamics is the bio-electromagnetic appreciation of life - even to the abiotic structures of which and through which we experience coherent perspective (and dissonance).

The mythic or image-based self is set in weaponising and marketising its domain as an expression of possession and control, because such identity operates dispossession from awareness of the Embracing Field of Communication that is of a different Order to 'control' as a synchrony.

The nanotechological intervention to the interface with EMR represents the persistence of the 'ego' of acknowledging ONLY that which is utilised for its function - which effects a blocking signal to Communication, such as to generate a realm of 'control' distanced from and locked down to lockstep in   a filtered and distorted weaponisation of communication, set as narrative dictate or mythic 'creation' through which to lens an experience of private thought and communication in alignment with others under lack-driven control as the basis of life in a body or object universe of things seeking external fulfilment under external threat - ie struggle, pain and death.

The belief in the body as distance and lockdown in survival runs contra to the capacity of Consciousness to attune to the Field. Such belief will operate to deny, distort and pervert a Field Recognition as if its own extinction. But a belief is in the mind of its believer and never truly in the externalised modelling of such a psychic survival. Recognising beliefs released Reality to be Itself, as Self-Revealing.

The original impulse of this post was invite awareness of the framing of invested 'control' as the as yet largely hidden great investment hope of the 'stakeholders' who must include those aligned in the same mindshare as apparent opposition.

Insofar as evils are recognised, they need be looked on and not used to generate a mask of virtue over hatred locked in thereby. New choices replace old habits in freedom. The model of destruction as the means of change is a mindset in denial, that then does as was done by, but knowing not what it does.

Alignment in the Field of being rises of itself from the recognition /release of what no longer belongs or serves purpose to a Current appreciation of integral Reality, as distinct from a mind modelling given priority and left running.