Curiosity didn't kill the cat!

Curiosity didn't kill the cat!

 

This reflection came out of 

https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/23/confessions-of-an-engineered-nanoparticle/

 (and comment threads)

When ‘dealing with’ invisible realms revealed through the lens of cultural or proprietary modelling (as in narratives that direct funding to frame research to generate narratives), I cannot but realise we are never really looking out at a world, but through the lens or structures of internalised ideas, definitions and beliefs that give us such experience - which includes our responses and development of further ideas that shape perceptions and behaviour.
This is not to say I disregard empirical witness any more that relational honesty and a basis for a coherently aligned life, world and self. We use the terms ‘mind' and ‘beliefs' in large part for masking justifications by which to maintain a continuity of self, and so develop them as a tool - that tools or shapes and directs our own experience of a qualitative experience through a quantitative representation. We also the terms “I” and ‘Me” for different facets of subject to an object.
The “I” that accepts physical determined existence will be unaware of the decision to accept and follow the themes for the benefits that are experienced or assumed. Questioning assumptions allows revealing of the mindset that they represent.
It is known that a subject under hypnosis can instantly operate or experience very differently, and that we are always ‘talking to ourself’ or indeed teaching ourself what we accept or believe by our actions and habit-reactions, so we are always learning, but often of a past that is no longer here but that we stamp its meaning as our present to persist such a strategy of life into future.
So what of the nano-particulate realm of bio-fields organising the patterning or structures of physics, biology and psychic participance? Do we not stumble upon Self at the edges of our maps - but unrecognised through the lens of thinking to ‘get’ - which exemplifies and teaches a sense of self-lack from which the movement to ‘get’ or ‘seek’ unfolds the desire to experience or go forth and multiply each according to its kind as embodiment.
As with garbage in; garbage out, we will not truly solve dissonance by manipulating the effects of the output, but by releasing the bug from the code - but if its a feature or protected narrative, the bug’s spike wags the virus.
How to escape from an impossible situation but to re-cognise we are not in it?
Covid gives a ready example for many who noticed it is a construct of coded meanings by which to restructure or reframe toxic conflicts to double down in ‘controls’ that invoke dictates masked in terror as the ‘creative’ word that goes forth to ‘deliver’ us unto self-illusion set over and against self-coherence - past the tipping point to the lockstepping structure and stricture demanding sacrifice to protect - and reset - the Model or ‘idol’ passing off as true.
It may be that to release a dysfunctional or dissonant pattern of thought requires fully owning it, rather than trying to get rid of it or make it go away - as in whack-a-mole as algorithm for a global military industrial complex - expanding to systemic regulatory capture to full spectrum ‘dominance’.
Curiosity didn't kill the cat - but gave rise to the sense of a many lived cat!

I see a spiked agenda running on mis-sold 'thescience'

in response to the themes in:

 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mike-yeadon-on-the-toxicities-deliberately-designed-into-the-covid-vaccines/

 

 

I lean to a sense that a philanthropathic bent and bought science is used to set 'risk modelling' as if fact - so as to initiate popular demand for protections and use that to gain regulatory capture or control function by stealth through 'thescience' set in faith given protected or securitised narratives - that we are trained and framed to think in.

Instead of observing life we fund a lot of in vitro, animal/insect and now in silico attempts to reverse engineer for predictive control - ostensibly for 'the betterment of all mankind' - its progress innit!

So biomarkers set into elitist models running on such narratives operate in place of an actual empirical assay.

EVERYTHING is being quantified to run as code entities in a technocracy.

Life is then sacrificed or discarded for the Model that 'Makes us safe!' (Too Big To Fail - sic)

A modern version of 'Idol'

How much of genetics is in fact dogma? The replacement of a true genesis offers all the gain of function set in false inheritances.

We stand on the shoulders of giant mistakes.

I see a spiked agenda running on mis-sold 'thescience' where toxic debt/consequence is outsourced (dumped) onto the body politic.

The simplest science on this that pertains may be the fundamental nature of zeta potential as the vitality of functional capacity and adaptive resilience that is undermined or weakened by toxic shock - and persistent toxic shock burden.

The 'tares' run a terminator script - initiating the harvest of a true discernment under conditions of compression by which the inessential is released. Call it 'wicked' if you want, but to divest you self of it - not to feed a guilting or gaslighting agenda.

Qualitative and Quantitative

 in response to the themes in:

https://pieceofmindful.com/2023/07/01/aids-covid-father-and-son-of-depopulation/

The difference between a qualitative and a quantitative is at the root of all of this.(all of our conflicting confusion).
That PCR match to its exponential replicating primers signifies a nanoscopic quantity– is NOT a quality – but it is a meaningless quantity in terms of function.
(BTW lead in ionic suspension at nanoscale shows none of the elemental properties of its elemental state. (Until it clumps to a threshhold of atomic combination).
Kary Mullis was a creative maverick acid-head – (no perjoritive intended, but a contextual reference for the recontextualising of multiple parameters to a new application of a thematic idea. 

The nano-scale realm is more akin to bio-field through which life is maintained far from entropy as an organised energetic-informational consciousness or symbiosis of all its parts relative to the whole as a ‘balance point’ within a flux of disequilibrium or ‘motion’ – that can be recognised as the `Field’ of a still point in every turning ‘world’. But integral sovereignty can be masked, phished or usurped by self-imaged identity by which to recontextualise multiple parameters to a novel application of the idea of predictive control.
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men can never put a fragmented, conflicted mind together again, but then there’s the hiding place to persist in the exercise of autonomous ‘control’ by which we eventually recognise an automaton has replaced a living will, and so step out of the game of control over fear-fed control.
Hating something (in your experience) and ‘wanting it to go away’ ie: deny, exorcise, excommunicate, ie: kill it – is the means to keep it out of a split off, compartmentalised fragmented & conflicted awareness under the spell of judgement by which we think to give hate and receive vindication as self-validation, and power to set peace as an ‘immunity’ to life as yet unrecognised and unresolved.
No matter what ‘scripted agenda’ runs within the split mind, it is not the alignment of reintegration to a healed or whole mind – which Calls on a different Guide & Protector than fear-framed symbols of a focus in masking to survive a loss of love/loveless world/state of dissociated self in survival by recontextualising of multiple parameters to a persisting application of the idea of an object-consciousness – through which the Spirit moves as through the body – not locked down, masked and distances IN it.

Cybernetics runs as the systems-theory of quantity to which qualities (of life) are sacrificed, ignore or discarded for substitutions of ‘derivative meanings’ such as delivery of care. Its closed -system thinking is the logic for a death cult – for it frames life as war – to which all else is subordinated. Look at the use of fear-threat set in false or bought ‘science’ to ‘justify’ destruction without scruple – as the means to its ‘final solution’.