The social, economic and political effects of insane premises

I appreciated this comment into a thread on the use, abuse or malign misuse of 'antipsychotic' drugs - that I would term anti-psyche drugs.

Sylvain June 9, 2017 at 7:16 am
As with the pharmaceutical industry, the fundamental reason for the distribution of neuroleptics by psychiatrists is economic.
1) Income
Prescribing neuroleptics takes a maximum of 1/4 hour per patient.
_ A psychotherapy session a minimum of 3/4 hour per patient.
By prescribing neuroleptics, the psychiatrist triple his income.
2) Social demand
By prescribing neuroleptics, the psychiatrist effectively solves a social problem in 70% of cases in the short term. This is the one and only thing the society asks of him.
3) Dependence
After some months of treatment, if the person stops gradually, the “relapse” rate is doubled for 18 months (Wunderink, 2007). If the person stops suddenly, the relapse rate is 75% in only 3 weeks.
By the neuroleptics, the psychiatrist is assured to retain a customer for many years. The legislation on forced and compulsory treatments plays exactly the same role.
The psychiatrist acts exactly like a street dealer and the state, instead of repressing the dealer, forces the drug addict to consume his toxic.
Addiction is not an undesirable effect for the psychiatrist: it is the very purpose of treatment.
Thus the question of neuroleptics is far from being exclusively scientific: it is above all an economic, political and social question.

The economic and political structure tends to define and frame perceived self interest so as to result in mind-share/market capture - and all of that is a form of mind control. The ideas generally under the heading of mind-control range from social engineering, PR, and narrative control - through to extremes such as MKUltra via the fragmentation of personality to program triggerable responses of otherwise suppressed or unconscious personality. In any case the nature of the control is coercive deceit.

Socialisation includes mind-control in all manner of ways - as part of induction and adaptation to a society predicated upon it as the means of the suppression of the feeling being and the limiting of consciousness to forms of substitution for genuine presence - and diversion from the inherent dissonance of a conflicted sense that becomes 'unconscious' while leaking out as undercurrent communication.

Coercion and deceit are part of the masking persona with which we become identified as our thinking - our core beliefs and accepted self-definitions which predicate our economic, political and social structures.

So an inability to maintain the mask of a kind of a mind-control already operating meets the energetics of guilted fear that operates a self-reinforcing negative. Now this is as true for the psychiatrist as the politician as the corporate, as the banker as the one whose life 'falls apart' or whose 'reality breaks down' or whose psychic-emotional conflicts overwhelm their capacity to manage their lives on their current basis.

However, mental illness - in the sense of psychic-emotional conflict - is crystallized in society AS society, AS an imposition of economic and political order. So waking up in self-responsibility from the prison of blame and shame is in one way or another stepping out of what seems a support network - even when it supports the sickness rather than the uncovering of health. This as true for a psychiatrist who loses the capacity to operate self-certainties of their own role, worth, world and meaning.

So I appreciate that what we see are the simple outcomes of the variables involved - and that while honesty of being is associated with penalty, sacrifice and loss it wont be taken up by directing more blame-hate at those whose perceptions confirm their beliefs - nor those who accept hurting or failing others is just part of the way power works.

So beneath the social realities are conflicted and conflicting unconscious beliefs that fragment our personae individually and collectively.

I see the demand for unconsciousness and the denial of consciousness as one event displaced to a fragmentation. They say 'be careful what you wish for' because you might get what you thought you wanted... and then wish to escape it.
But I say turn the wish or the pain of a wish denied - to a present willingness, a present receptivity to the movement of a true desire - which is recognized and felt directly as a sense of true connected being.

Who is not addicted to their own thinking? But socially acceptable addiction is invisible within its culture bubble. Awareness of the thinking rather than living as if in its bubble reality - grows the trust in an innate capacity to feel or discern a true resonance and join with what does, while releasing what does not - and bring curiosity to choices made or habits accepted that we say we do not want or that we recognize as being associated with painful consequence. Because there is more to uncover about what we actually believe beneath the masking defences beliefs inherently operate as part of bringing you the experience their perspective.

I articulate as words may but I could also say, "and an evil spell fell upon the minds of all who listened and believed they heard and received something new, something more and something special to this new sense of themself - such that they no longer remembered who they were - but through a distortion and no longer recognized themselves or each other in a world of their own personal sense of power - and the reflection of the use of such power in opposition, adversity, loss of support, betrayal, abandonment, malevolence and threat of pain, loss and death. Sometimes the righteous defender overrides the desperate but distorted attempt to regain a sense of selfworth, power or validity. But we all know the story - that seems to run itself and force us to play out its script - because we live its parts - however we mask or focus within some and hide (or hide in) others.

I feel the call to a culture of true support for being amidst an 'insane world'. So living that - anyway and in any way - is living from being - such as we are graced to notice, to accept and welcome by acting or embodying who we are - instead of struggling with who we are not. But of course we meet the insanity rather than operate over its suppression - and this is where the difference between my sense of self and reality - is recognizably out of true - though that knowing comes from a different sense of self than my thinking. But for me the device of hiding the insanity beneath the false flag of an evil ‘out there’ was not available though intensely felt - because something had woken in my life - as truly living - that I did not want to lose - even though I could not abide it or ‘handle it’ or fully accept and integrate it - all at once.
So I not only did not seek official ‘help’, for I did not want to be ‘put back’ into what I was before - nor did it occur to me to consider ‘medication’ - though for some time I was ‘unmanned’ (rendered helpless) by terror rising from loss of mind-control.
 But the ‘path’ that grew from a core recognition, grew in responsibility for fear in many of its forms of dysfunction - and over many years this ripened to a capacity to truly receive - and therfore share - in love. I’m not saying ‘happy ever after’ so much as Letting Life in and being aligned, guided and supported in being. And that this - whatever it may seem - is never a private outcome but is part of growing willingness in the world.

A community bus service calls in at all the various locations so that everyone has access. I see the same in our paths of development (intrapersonally) and relationally (interpersonally). For in love and truth these are two facets of one. But in my fear of withdrawal of support, I meet the ‘rejection’ or the ‘abandonment’ or even the ‘killer’ personality fragment of a match for something I am initially unaware of carrying. Of course they have their own scripts and shadow selves and the whole thing runs by reaction - such as to call on suppression and distanciation to limit the effects - while charging up the ‘engine’ of its expression beneath an assertive narrative identity/reality.

Different people need different approaches at different times of their life. Of myself I have said - looking back that “I was a hard nut to crack” - or that “it took whatever it took to bring me through to this present of feeling being - for although I clothe the meanings in words the gist is the meaning that is felt when the mind is a follower - not a leader. True desire is purposed on unified fulfilment - that attracts and aligns without coercion as an unfolding of fulfilment. Why waith for something to happen before you live the moment you have and are - even though it may contain elements of challenge and transformation or expansion to who you currently accept yourself to be.

Systems of control usurp relational being (Pharmed fear and sickness)

Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Health Care
By Peter Gøtzsche, MD

I have much appreciated Peter Gøtzsche's witness in regard to Open Dialogue therapy and psychotherapy violence and now a more open witness to the deceits and coercions of corporate sickness management.

So I commented to Peter's reply on the above page's comments but as it is an article in itself I put only the first part of this there - and the whole here.

- - -

Thankyou for your willingness in honest witness and in rage - which I see in terms of sweeping out the Template and not in the frame of blame and sacrifice. Awakening responsibility cannot be putting the guilt of shame I feel - onto others who I might want or feel compelled to target and make them feel it. Loveless behaviour is psychologically defended against exposure and damnation or pain of penalty - often under guise of forms of benevolence. However relational honesty does not mean sympathy with false or hurtful choices and the law is all we have as a way to grow a culture of shared worth at the level of being.

The link to the free chapter no longer works. Can it be set to work again?

Anti-vitamin bias is part of the pharmed medical paradigm - and anti-nature and anti psyche too - though all framed in definitions that seem to rescue or protect.

I have seen credible reports that vitamin K2 (mk7?) sufficiency is a key with regard to the functional delivery of calcium TO bones, teeth and innate cell function - and removal FROM plaques, arteries, soft-tissue, brain etc. But the integrative and positive synergies of nutrition are much more complex than the pharmed medical model that sees separate parts acting on separate parts and its separate manual intervention as 'heroic'. There are no separations - so much as energetic relations within and of a wholeness that includes - and embodies the psyche of relational being - which is a constellation rather than a conceptual fragmentation seeking validation in its own terms.

Re: Industrial collectivised diet:
Yes Big Ag/Food cannot be separated from Pharma - even our 'healthy veg' may be mineral or nutritionally deficient - and contain man-made toxins. I see a negative synergy of a falsely segregative mind -in the idea of 'power over' rather than power shared. Imposed system rather than relational balance of a genuine dialogue.

So you wrote in your books introduction:
"If you don’t think the system is out of control, please email me and explain why drugs are the third leading cause of death in the part of the world that uses most drugs".


I felt the way you define it is illuminating the problem which I would say is understated - for I believe if one sees the root cause AS the 'system of control' (Embodying the definitional structure of our currency of thought) - then this also is the key factor beneath heart disease and cancers - because a relational balance is both the stress AND its naturally embracing or clearing accompaniment. But a systematic or rule based and conditioned assertion or imposition locks the stress in place by means of defending against it - and sets up a negative of fear-based rigidity in the fear of re-lived pain of loss as IF a positive idea of survival under threat - or maintaining function under duress. This switches our chemistry and consciousness to run on stress and lose relational awareness; the feeling of being. Felt presence. Health in wholeness.

Protected fear, structures our mind and society, in defence against such awareness.
I did not find your email address but expand this response to the idea 'system out of control' to consider that corruption of true is not a blame-shame perpetuity, so much as loss of true currency of thought and communication to adulterations, subverted meanings and derivative impressions and associations that usurp or 'capture' our mind. The sacrifice of joy in life under false pretences brings dissonance and false or misguided attempts to block, eradicate or overcome dissonance. But true correction uncovers the underlying error of mis-taken identity to a current re-connection and recognition of shared or extending presence.

Releasing 'old' and no longer serving systems of control upon which we have become psycho-emotionally dependent (with physically experienced reinforcements), is the same patterning as releasing drug addictions or even relational patterns of support that change. I hold that the true movement of our being is NOT dependent upon joining in fear, hate or rage against perceived evils, and so the evils of our 'day thereof' must become the basis of a deeper undefended honesty of being - within ourself as with each other. But that must is my own acceptance - and not a basis to 'correct' another in evasion of  my true acceptance.

I feel that the mechanistic anti-relational paradigm (mind-in act) is an evasion of attempted escape from psychic emotional conflict that is in a sense vowed NEVER to be relived or allowed back into a 'walled off' system of control based upon it. This makes for 'kill the Messenger'. It also makes for the sacrifice of truth and life to maintain a sense of private control as the structural belief out of which we seem compelled to operate. In your discipline, you have become aware of a part of how this 'works'. I do not see it is really about money in itself - but it is about power for its own sake and yet that idea of power is itself corrupted.

I see our identities have been 'phished' to run on false or wishful pretenses. "Coming off them" has to be a 'coming out' - not as an identity seeking validation - but as an extension of worth in true witness.

Open Dialogue will not be allowed to fruit healing under fear-framed or blame thinking - which is more structurally pervasive than at first we see. In living FROM its terms, we do not notice it for that is part of its invoked purpose; not to know. Nor then do we notice that it generates a biased and distorted experience of the life that we cannot successfully NOT be. But denial can and does lose awareness within masking personae, over undercurrents of dissonance in mutually defined and packaged  and 'outsourced' or re-packaged guilt.  This runs as normal social adaptation within a world in 'power struggle' under threat, to excludes to protect a segregative sense of self separateness - subjecting or in power over, and subjected or victim - both. But this is joyless self sacrifice to what doesn't and cannot work - except - as a denial or invalidation of existence in the guise of acting out fantasy gratifications of false association. Joy is of a true foundation or truly Felt currency of being. Perhaps we must 'choose' what we truly are and feel to be, to displace the habit of an old choice to be something 'else' that does not work or make sense to who we discover ourselves to be.

Psychosis and coercive medicine

Do doctors rely too much on drugs to treat mental health problems?


If anyone is interested in something I find addresses this issue very positively it is the 'open dialogue therapy' - and a youtube search brings various results.

On the other side of the spectrum I also see that the cultural narrative of 'western developed nations' - and hence globalism - has been corrupted by corporate cartels of financial and energy monopoly - who have used their considerable influence to shape and control the narratives within which we think, live, work - and do science. The linkage between the corporately captured or controlled state regulatory system and the official medical models that are thereby protected against other perspectives that are seen as rival or threat to the revenue stream and societal control, is whitewashed, airbrushed and protected by all the psychological defences that can be looked up online and recognized as part of the human personality structure. Systematized and deliberate insanity operates a trojan deceit through many who believe what their education has instilled in them as true. But the inclination to believe it is targeted just as advertizers and politicians target specific fear seeking protection, or indeed desires for self-specialness. Yet it is more 'disturbing' to uncover a false narrative than to conform within its dictate - hence evasion is also targeted heavily with a wide range of 'medications'.

I also appreciated reading 'Anatomy of an Epidemic'. Our 'defences' do the thing they claim to protect from - and become entrapments to 'perpetual war' management. If fear is too great then of course consider way to make a space in which some degree of self-responsibility can be recognized and grown - and drugs can be part of this.

Meanwhile the list of disorders grows and whatever life remains is medicalized, marketized or weaponized - all for our protection of course. Look up 'open dialogue'.

Cholesterol Wisdom

Conversations around falsely demonized cholesterol


I include responses - but the pattern of the blocking of the flow of any real communication that seemed to occur is like to the idea of shutting down the heart arteries.

Be the heart anyway - or be rused into conflict.


Is conventional wisdom on cholesterol about to be turned upside down?


The headline could have read as: "Is the medical fraud based on false cholesterol science about to be corrected?"

However the investment in false models can be so pervasive and institutionally powerful as to make it 'take' as if legitimate 'currency' by frequent and multiple assertions of gullibility and disinformation.

The idea of 'controlling the narrative' requires that genuine journalism (along with transparency and accountability) are heavily disincentivised.

Welcome to Corporate Technocracy - with or without the EU? You are to have no voice unless it conforms and aligns with what the official dictate decrees - in which case you can get a hit of power and privilege by pretending it is your voice. There is a kind of psychopathic thinking that sees everything in terms of power struggle - and science and medicine are no less useful as masks than was religion. Discernment is the key to everything - for without it are you a leaf in the wind to conditioning of which you are unaware.

The nature of power-addiction is rooted in a hatred of Life and seeks the invalidation and replacement of alignment with Life by a mentality of 'control' - however the more control is imposed - the more out of control everything becomes - which to the power-elitist means the more control must be brought to bear. They simply refuse to look within and so cannot really learn anything other than subsuming more life to serve power interests.

The model of the world we co-create as currency of experience and exchange tends to demonize and invalidate Life on Earth so as to gain power thereby and 'lord over it' - even at cost of planetary ruin. Ignorance and arrogance worshipped in self-righteous hate that would make a 'new world order' through destructive deceits.

Discerning deceit is something that cannot be systematized as any kind of method or dogmatic set of beliefs - for at best there are guidelines and pointers. You have to be honest within yourself to notice and see the fault in your own mind - else you attempt to pluck it from others - who of course counter or oppose - or manipulate your displaced needs. Its a mess!

No one owns, controls or judges THE truth to which others must then conform or be invalidated. This is not power but desperation masking as a need to be validated OR ELSE! Because 'too big to fail means' ON MY TERMS or really bad things will happen to you as a result of disengaging from my 'protection'.

It is simply true in general that the attempt to persist in denial of our true feeling and being seeks ways to cast responsibility elsewhere and then righteously hate in the name of science or health and safety - so as to draw power for the few who position themselves where the 'power, influence or money' has been redirected as a result of packaging fear in new forms that promise answer or protection.

I appreciate Stephanie Seneff's research - as one facet of a larger understanding. Nothing is so denying of truth as the belief one already knows - so don't forget to genuinely check in all the time instead of setting identity on auto pilot that is then hacked and run by fear Inc.


    SpinResistant - to the main article:

    Almost anything is a "potential" gamechanger.

    Most of the author's appear to be career-antistatinists and the studies reviewed seem to have ben cherry-picked within an inch of their lives.

    Why didn't they do a meta-analysis its easy enough, once you've got the datasets



    My reply to SpinResistant:

    Stephanie Seneff has done very interesting research - and is very much in touch with and able to make sense of a huge range of data.

    I don't know what a career antistatinist is? Someone who risks their career to warn of gullible trust in institutional corruption?

    Without Chloresterol your life-experience is degraded and diminished. Perhaps this is preferable to awakening responsibility for your life-experience instead of the protection racket in which you can not have to arrive at your own discernments - because you are fitted to a dictate that manages your life for you - or should I rename that as managing your sickness for you. There is a choice here that is not a way to be smug - but a way to grow a more integrated and embracing perspective. And yes - on the way it meets fears and other negative feelings - but finds a way to integrate and more truly align through the experience of discomfort or dissonance.

    Spin resistance if you want - but to truly be wise to the deceits of spin you have to be able to watch your own mind - while reactions are triggered and genuinely desire a better way than guilt, blame and hate.

    Blaming Cholesterol is just another scapegoat for a mis-taken perception in which a sense of guilt and fear re-enact primary defences that cause more damage than the supposed 'enemy'.

    SpinResistant:
    A career anti-statinist is a person who has has written at least one book or paper claiming that cholesterol is not harmful. People who have very strong views on the issue are not the best choice for carrying out a review involving the cherry picking of studies, and subjective summaries of findings, as this one does. Even given the cherry-picking, a metanalysis would yield a summary of the data that is not subject to reviewer biases and it is deeply suspicious that such techniques were not employed. I've been taking statins for 20 years after having a couple of TIAs - symptoms disappeared, blood pressure reduced and no side-effects at all.
    Apart from a very small number of people who get muscle pains, statins are almost free from side-effects for the general population. They are statistically associated with reduced mortality in patients at risk from high blood pressure and this study does nothing to put this frequently replicated finding in doubt.
    Without question - the low risk course is to take statins if a doctor prescribes them, and not to be alarmed by careerists trying to stir up controversy where there is no basis for it. And I'm a statistician (which the authors of this irresponsibly selective review are clearly not - and I do not work for or have any connection whatever with drug companies). The claims made by some commentators on this thtread that cholesterol is not harmful fly in the face of a huge amount of evidence and in my view are irresponsible in the extreme.

My reply:


    I believe you are misinformed. But if you are able to interpret data, then perhaps look at Seneff's work. She has studied symptom report data as well as biology and is well qualified - and without vested commercial interest in interpreting the data.
    A book is not a career - but your argument does apply to those whose careers are enhanced or maintained by extremely powerful commercial lobbies.
    Strong feelings for an honesty of communication allow pioneering scientists to challenge the false assumptions in which science gets stuck in defending due to investments of reputation, money and power in the model.
    I want science unshackled and so I am heartened by those willing to risk careers in challenging dogma.



    According to Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and former longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ): "It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine."


    Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-chief of the Lancet recently published a statement declaring that a shocking amount of published research is unreliable at best, if not completely false, as in, fraudulent. Horton declared, "Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."



    SpinResistant:
    I have no objection to anyone challenging dogma and I hold no particular bbrief for the New England Journal of Medicine, which like the BMJ and the Lancet in the UK exist to publish research by medics which would almost never get published in the prestige journals in which professional/career researchers publish.
    However the mere fact that a dogna is challenged is not a sufficient basis for concluding that the challenger is is correct - that decision must be based upon whether the evidence supporting the challenger's case outweighs the evidence supporting the orthodox position.
    In the present case, the challenger's case is partial and selective, the design of the study is inadequate and the body of evidence to the contrary is formidable.
    There is no evidence in the study discussed above that statins are harmful, and the very week case made to support the hypothesis that cholesterol is not is hugely outweighed by studies showing reduced mortality when "bad cholesterol" is reduced. You are free to believe and act upon the current study if you wish, but persuading other people to do so, given the present imbalance of evidence is unethical and irresponsible.
    Despite your rants about the quality of medical evidence, it is as well to bear in mind that the overwhelming majority of people with serious conditions who follow medical advice will do an awful lot better than those who follow the advice of persons such as yourself.
    By all means feel free to act believe and stupidly, but don't I beg you, try to make converts.



    My reply:


    I have no expectation of communication with those unwilling to listen - and no desire to persuade anyone of anything they are not already recognizing as their own insight or understanding. You have a multibillion dollar market from statins alone - forecast to reach 1,000,000,000,000 dollars in 2020 (Trillion dollars - http://www.pagetutor.com/trill... )
    I have honesty and peace of heart and mind. There are countless studies showing the reverse of the 'conventional wisdom' arising from false associations made by an economist - backed by corporate cartels (Keys).
    I would not wish to convert anyone from their capacity to question and discover for themselves - but the fear that prevents such questioning is leveraged by deceit.
    The death (and disease) arising from legitimately prescribed drugs is one of the major pathologies of our time. How much is quackery hiding in the trojan horse of corporately driven "science"? While doctors become puppets of and pushers for the pharmaceutical companies - the trust in the integrity of the science fades or is replaced by a psuedo religion.
    I don't base anything I write here on the study in this article - it is one among countless - along with direct testimony of reported experience that is not 'clinical' evidence and is therefore ignored. The arrogance of elitist power playing with the lives of others is matched only by a corresponding ignorance of self reinforcing justifications.
    Don't take anyone's advice without discerning or listening to your own inmost honesty.
    If cleverdicks sow complexities in which fear, guilt and self-invalidation reactively send you along the outcome they want - then you can learn something about what happens when you don't stand in your own integrity - and change your mind for a better one. Supporting a decision is making sure the full information for making choice is available. Technocracies of control dictate the narrative and frame the choices so as to deny or invalidate any other. This is all about power and not about anything scientific whatsoever. Nor should we be surprised that such agendas corrupt our institutions, leaders and researchers because it has been the history of humankind since before we even kept it.

- - -


    Yousif posted:
    Whose advice to follow? a lot of us are disoriented.



    My reply to Yousif:
    Better to be unsure and thus willing and curious to learn, than give power away to supposed authorities who are perhaps not holding your interests at heart, nor transparent in their actions or accountable for their consequences?


    The whole 'natural things are bad for you' is a cover for the actuality that unnatural 'food' is making you sick and stupid - not you personally - but as a general degrading of consciousness in which we can no longer 'think for ourselves' if we wanted to. I actually use feeling to discern the nature of thought - because spin-doctors always use fear and guilt to leverage outcomes. But the catch 22 is that if you are blind to your own spin, you wont be able to feel anything - because the emotionality of being deceived is not a freedom to feel.


    Calming and aligning your being by whatever means works for you will allow the pause of false thinking and the rise of a truly felt perspective. This is living a step at a time and listening as you go rather than finally getting control of your life. It is actually safer than the illusion of safety - because you are in touch with what is going on rather than relying on old and often wrong thinking that does not stop to ask because it believes it already knows.


    SpinResistant chimes in with:
    You are entitled to your views, but I'm afraid they sound like incoherent bunkum to me. The trouble with studies like the one reported here is that loony-fringe individuals such as yourself latch onto them and cause unjustified concern in usually sensible people. If I thought you would be able to understand it, I would suggest you go away and look at the medical literature on statins and cholesterol reduction. But you have said enough already to make me completely onfident that you wouldn't be able to make head or tail of it and you don't know what you are talking about.


    My reply to SpinResistant


    But of course I must appear so to you - given your presumptions.
    There is a directed history to uncover regarding saturated fats, cholesterol and bad science - unless you are unwilling and unable to challenge embedded or accepted beliefs.
    The body makes cholesterol because it NEEDS it. The brain accounts for about 25% of your body's cholesterol and starving it will and does have consequences.
    Calling me a looney fringe individual is a very poor attempt to assume superiority. If you can respond with civility that honours communication then I am confident you can expand your perspective on this subject.
    I don't argue with your experience. If statins have helped you - then I am glad for you.


SpinResistant binra
You are talking nonsense. I'm sure you believe what you say but it makes no sense at all and you should stick to commenting on websites for cranks and loonies. On serious website you may cause unnecessary alarm even though your posts never rise above ignorant foolishness.


    My reply to SpinResistant
    From out of your own mouth! However, I know your true potential is infinitely greater than such a ruse. Who fools who?
    If you don't understand - why judge in hate?
    This is not a competition - but an opportunity for communication. But when communication is replaced with coercion and deceit - using the FORMS of communication, then I see a wolf in sheep's clothing. How much do you notice of the underlying intent that communicates through your sense of standing in judgement over another so as to invalidate them and try to pass off as 'better'?
    I don't turn true willingness on and off according to the website I am on - in fact it doesn't come into it. I am meeting you - and others - in shared consideration. I don't make you or anyone believe or do anything that isn't your own will - nor seek to trick you into anything. In a world of spin, truth is not believed possible - only competing spin. There is no ground beneath your feet - though you gather statistical 'proofs' to the contrary. I don't say what you should do. I trust you can feel and find what you need, as you need it and extend you the benefit of any doubt - for if you could perceive differently, you would.

Scientizing, marketizing, weaponizing, lies

Zika fake science back in the news; con artists at work
by Jon Rappoport   

Is it about science or money?

US health agencies want more than the $600 million they’ve allotted to the “war against Zika.” They want $1.9 billion. Why not? They always want more money.

To make their case, the CDC has pushed out a new Zika study in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM): “Zika Virus and Birth Defects — Reviewing the Evidence for Causality”.

Before commenting on that study, let’s recall a devastating statement the NEJM’s former editor, Marcia Angell, issued in 2009, after she had headed up that non-science machine for 20 years:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

(for more of the article follow the link above)
- - -

I appreciate your (Jon's) willingness to speak out against accepting false witness. I note that the resources of those who seek to distort truth for power agenda - be that conspiring, tacitly operating or unconsciously aligning in - can persist over time in such a way that the pockets of 'resistance' die out from underfunding and irrelevance in the massed mind of following and aligning in power as it is perceived to be operating - regardless what the consequences might be - because to step outside that identity is too terrifying or indeed un-thinkable. I believe our blocks or traps are definitional at root and that in your terms - to re-imagine is to see the opportunity of self-knowledge and healing where before the symptoms or outer effects reflected deeply embedded conditioning that itself needs to come up and be re-evaluated. This is not easy because we all seek to protect our sense of self from exposure to what we hate to own or fear to know.

I believe money is a leveraging medium in this and behind it is power. So it isn't the choice between science and money - but between honesty and power - as each are defined in any situation for those involved. Power may be a capacity for changing society or any other relational outcome, to align and conform to your continued role, status and identity.

Merely engaging at the level of castigating persons judged morally reprehensible or criminally motivated, tends to reflect us - without illuminating the forces of relational conditioning that result in such symptoms just as our transportation network results in supermarkets.
Yes I feel the law needs to operate against corporate transnational fraud - but beneath that needs a clearer view of what is actually going on - not in panto terms of villains - but of our relational and social patterns as they manifest from hidden personal and collective definitions and beliefs - most of which are preverbal and un-conscious presumptions of reality that have never been called into question and are actively defended from being brought to an exposure that is felt to be the recurrence of identity trauma that the persona is hard wired to cover over.

On the plus side, there is a conscious level of hate and fear that is becoming more than a pervasive background as the beast rises up from unconscious depth to no longer be coverable, and if the identity-persona no longer does its original job of protecting or hiding from the intolerable - then there is a greater willingness to question it, challenge it or enquire as to what is really going on in this conscious experience of disturbance. The matrix of sleepwalking depends on reacting with self certainty to align against the hated and feared other.

When I was a child we were told that when we made ugly faces in play, that if the wind changed, we might be stuck with them. This is not science - but a deeper wisdom - for impersonating and taking on of roles that are out of true with who you really are can indeed find such reflected acceptance that status and power are given and you start to believe  and become imprisoned in your own spin.

Humanity has 'played' within the idea of limitation, become enamoured and fascinated in it and in a sense taken over and compelled by the forces invoked within it. Not that all limitation is negative for a cohesive experience requires some things in proportion. But any limited self sense taken or accepted as whole self - not only cuts off or subverts and distorts the communications of 'denied or forgotten self', but demonizes them as violations while defending an alien sense of power over self as if that is the way life works. And that is the conditioning of many who depend on such a power to keep the matrix of personality in place - against what thought is foresworn not to refer to.

When we break the societal or group rule - because the cost of the rule is unbearable and the rule itself insane - it is we who are found unbearable and considered insane. "Just don't look there, think like that or talk about it. Sacrifice is the way we survive in the darkness and your curiosity and imagination must be harnessed to seek the light in ways that must never let it in.
What hides in the dark believes the light to be fearful - because its first experience of consciousness is associated with fear that is never to be allowed again - and whatever keeps terror at bay is part of the price we pay - being necessary evil that must ever be appeased.

Excepting this - that when the drama is opened - what is actually exposed beneath it is a perspective upon it from a foundation that fear does not know and caused to be hidden.
But the compulsion to engage in character and play out the drama is the persistence of delay in which the presence of what is truly present cannot be received - and everything is filtered through a distorting lens of a false context from which conflicted fragments re-enact the 'Separation' endlessly - as every moment of experience divorced from direct and intimate communion.

For want of any words I used communion because it is a feeling of being that is open to and responsive within Life. It is not a goal - but the only true starting place - and as time is serving the purpose you give it (delay or willing acceptance), you can always re-member and resume from who you are no matter what drama seemed to locate you in someone/somewhere else.

The getting or needy compulsion is carrot-goaled and stick-driven. But a present appreciation is free to choose goals that extend and reflect who we truly are - both in time currently and out of time as the vibratory presence of a unique gift of being - to have and to hold and to share. Divorcing our truth is not 'independence' but to place ourself under a tyrannous deceit. A liar by nature for how else can we be who we are not and 'get' our reward?

Tracy Kolenchuk says to the main article: (snips)

Research studies for medical treatments, do not study cures. CURED is never defined, and if a cure is actually encountered, it cannot be noticed, much less documented.

So… If birth defects are caused by a virus, a parasite, the drug companies can search for a ‘cure’ (for the mother). But if it’s a result of malnutrition, or toxic chemicals, it can’t be cured, because cured is not defined for those diseases.

If we want to search for cures, we must find the cause, in every case. It’s that simple, and that complicated.

My response:

Yes. 'Cure' is usually reserved for sale promotions and press releases. Just as sinners were held such until death and judgement sorted them out, people are now sick and uncurable - requiring 'treatment' to manage symptoms through life to death - which is the unspoken release from a life that fails and so must be manually propped up with drugs and interventions.

At consciousness level, true recognition of cause is the cure, because a false cause can no longer function AS cause. But an unwillingness or unreadiness to accept healing will use the cause as a basis for endless seeking or methods and modalities of processes that ensure that 'judgement day' never comes. For seeing the false or out of true - and releasing it so as to embrace the wholly true is the underlying nature of being released from judgements rising from false or misaligned sense of self-conflictedness.

That some of our physical manifestations operate out of collective and culturally inherited misalignments and seem a long time coming, is part of our ability to separate cause and effect by focussing exclusively in effects (symptoms or reflections) as if our causes are there in conflicted world. To achieve this we have to ignore or deny our Cause and never look there or ask of it - or act forth in the authority of such author-ship. Though I write it in metaphysical terms the physical patterns are abundantly available. It's a question of whether to read the symptoms as part of a language of being or eradicate and suppress them so as to impose a language of form.

Whether you or anyone else follows me in this I join with your putting cause and cure together. If health is an active awakened and balanced consciousness - then releasing a false or illegitimate definition from that consciousness can be said to have cured - or rendered the dis-ease to the status of a choice rather than being victim to an object of affliction. Abiding or holding firm in choice for Life when the pervasive culture is operating in reversal is itself part of a larger 'dis-ease'. But health is the way to grow health and focusing on sickness in any other context that a desire for healing is simply feeding it. No blame in anything I offer. Awakened responsibility is a releasing of so much that we try to be or do that is not our function to take on or capacity to fulfil and blame rose from being set up to fail. So where there is a propensity for blame - look to the underlying definitions that effectively set up the situation.

So much denial of feelings turns the body (and the body of our world) into a dumping place for 'toxicity'. Our feelings are implicitly part of the signs and language of our being. They need acceptance for being - not denial and 'rationalising' away. But they don't need to have access to our reactivity - so a pause is essential in which to check the purpose that is active - and instead of seeking to control symptoms - exercise control as the finding of a way of opening to an acceptance for being - rather than a split or conflicted judgement that effectively usurps the full and beautiful feeling of being. If we don't 'come from' a true sense of self - we meet something false - but experience it as our reality because we accepted it as our self. Regardless the drama it is packaged in - it remains a choice at some level - if not in the forms we currently define it.

Drug induced murder

David Healey considers the story of psycho active drug effects as a defence against murder in The Archers: Rob and Helen




Relational communication - within and AS consciousness, reflects or embodies itself as relationships. Breakdown of communication is part of the core foundational experience for a human personality construct - at least this has been so for millennia in various degrees and patterns of social and political organisation or mores that reinforce tacit agreements and definitions that operate as psychological defences - principally the avoidance of intimacy - which is become associated with trauma to avoid, escape or deny to awareness.

This personality level operates as a fragmentation or splitting off of various shifting fragments that are triggered by events that re-enact core conditionings. And just as with the electrical nature of chemical bondings, resonances and correspondences - we have all kinds of split or broken communication representing in polarities that no longer appear to have a core or unifying identity.

There are underlying attractions of a deeper 'chemistry' in all our relations and communications. These may be called transactional - but are mostly running subconscious routines from survival choices made at a pre-verbal period of development - and which are generated similar to a mask that is predicated to be looked 'out-from' - lived as - and not expose the masking act or the conflicting fragmented feelings that gave rise to the extroversion of presentation or the introversion of hiding behind it. Even blind rage has an inner hurt beneath it - and the fear of such rage, a profound sense of self-distrust or self-guilt.

What I sketched out in rough is not new - but the believed and perceived need to mask or avoid and escape intimate communication or relationship - generates coded overlays of scripted story in which our guilt masks in apologising for our existence and suppressing, invalidating or suppressing our own felt communication, while fear hides within blame stories that assign it to external or un-present causes that serve as scapegoat against which we justify a power relationship of more or less - and so generate hierarchy as if identity grows or diminishes with victory and loss.

The whole thing is a mess - yet it is the mess that has 'evolved' or perhaps devolved to ever more complex fragmentations of obfuscation and disguise - that is defended and maintained as if one's life depended on it - for in some sense it does until there is an awakening responsibility of and AS consciousness - rather than the entanglement of misidentification under falsely accepted self definition as a result of the particular patterning of separation trauma.

Consciousness as present responsibility or creative freedom of choice is a quality of presence and awareness that is naturally present unless exchanged for diversionary experience. While blame feelings are genuine feedback to accept and integrate - blaming scripts are blind and loveless.

The desire for unconsciousness in evasion needs and uses blame to prevent communication or re-integrative healing from rising. But any individual waking to the desire for healing or freedom from such conflicted self-sense - can begin the process of taking responsibility for their consciousness rather than hiding from fear or hiding in fear.
This is messy involvement in a real relationship - within - and many agencies of denial and control are generated from the desire to avoid feeling what we hate, and want to get rid of or suppress so as to 'get our life back'. But our life is not the masking persona - though it serves a necessary function that changes with the awakening of a responsibility as willingness or capacity to love.

The core condition that I see is willingness for communication - and its denial operates as the control of the narrative by which all meanings are conformed and derived in terms of blame and invalidation - in which moments of relative 'innocence' and 'justified' attack on transgressions set struggle within a blame game that is as rigged from the outset as is our fiat currency system.

Active Placebos used as deceits

Companies clash over statin side effects. Which is lying?
By Jerome Burne

 

 

As I see it, the ‘active’ placebo effect – where some bodily response “tells you” that the drug is “working” such as a dry throat, is known to have a greater result than say a sugar pill alone.
Drug companies also utilize this in their “real medicines”.
I have the distinct impression that drug companies often set up their trial parameters in such a way as to distort the results – So the placebo is inactive and the trial drug – say fluoxetine (prozac) is adulterated with active extras that ‘tell the subject that the drug is working’.
There are a whole range of tricks that clever people routinely do to sell what otherwise would be less wanted or unwanted or indeed criminal to purvey.
The key things I see are that data – to have any scientific credibility – must be open – and that the trials really need to be independent of the drug company influence – which is a trillion dollar distortion field. How could it NOT be?
Our modern society is built on ‘getting’ while avoiding being ‘got from’. And is no basis for whole or healthy anything – nor one in which healing or reintegrating modalities and perspectives can grow and fruit. This calls on a profound ‘paradigm’ shift in our core self definitions as to who we are and what life is for.
If the foundation is corrupt – everything built upon it – no matter how well intentioned – follows suit).
One can petition inherently corrupt institutions to deliver fairness or just and honest service and communication – and fight the lack of this in law to some degree – and there are ways of doing this that share true witness rather than pursue a merely private agenda – but the desire and willingness to uncover a true foundation is discerning what truly resonates your integrity rather than handing all power over to experts – who may be worthy advisers to your informed decision.
Is sickness an absence of drugs? Is pre-emptive sacrifice for the sake of ‘reducing risk’ of fear-mongered conditions – the true cause of which are not investigated or published – a worthy or sane response?
If power and wealth is so disproportionately distributed, it belies that the vast majority want to give it away – or rather use ‘others’ as their protector and guide rather than awaken their own responsibilities. And those riding the wave encourage it and and are encouraged – even demanded – to persist. How insane can insane get before it can no longer mask as sanity – and therefore attract allegiance? They say everyone has their breaking point – but dissociation can fragment into less and less consciousness operating more and more regulated ‘existence’ – perhaps without ever breaking ranks to question its ‘reality’.


The 'Editorial" of the article responded with

A revolutionary approach to testing new drugs is not to use a placebo at all. Who wants to know if something is better than nothing? What you want to know is whether it is better than the best treatment currently available. This is what a wonderful patient oriented research clinic in Italy called Mario Negri does. For more details search for it on this site. It does something else even more radical and even more patient and community minded – it doesn’t take out any patents on the beneficial new molecules it finds.It makes them available to treat people. Utopian? Yes but also feasible. It has been going 60 years.

I further respond:

Firstly placebo is not 'nothing' and the belief it is, 'nothings' the power or agency of Mind. The effects that are known to arise as a result of placebo are far ranging and indicate a link between expectations and brain and body function at the cellular level. Indeed psycho-emotional effect on the body are far reaching - and yet this is what 'traditional science' is dead set on denying - not least by defining everything in material organic terms that the 'person' or subjective response mechanism - is merely subjected to, imprinted or programmed by.
The 'best treatment currently available' is a highly contentious and debatable term. Medical history is littered with the best treatment available that is invariably invalidated by the superseding methods with the idea of 'progress' implicit.

My sense is that there is a significant underlay of unaddressed (read avoided and masked) relational issues - (psycho-emotional) that have cultural and social reinforcements leading to breakdowns of communication and functionality resulting in many patterns of 'dis ease' reflecting and embodying the relational issue.

As a brief pre-amble, consider that unresolved separation trauma is pushed or denied to the 'subconscious and unconscious' or denial habit and denied but active, and much of this is dumped in the body - being unable to move and find acceptance as communication. This essentially sets up a jack in the box of feared or negative threats and outcomes that mask themselves in all kinds of avoidance and displacement patterns - including sickness and susceptibility to sickness. This perspective is likely to trigger defensive rage in those who equate awakening responsibility with blame and penalty. Who find protection from deeper fears by which a propensity for guilt calls their integrity and validity into question. But with this temporary reprieve comes subjection to the 'power' that provides the protection.

When symptoms arise we are trained to fear something has gone wrong and to project the negative expectation forward and seek help to avoid that projection. This is the power of the mind-training of a fundamental distrust of self and Life - in short a communication breakdown of 'separation trauma' re-enacting itself.

One easy to observe experiment is to purposefully align with choosing to act on joyous choices that will inevitably open a truly joyous or unified sense of life and wellbeing - into which the separation-belief pattern interjects itself as a loss of power, worth, relationship, inspiration and perspective. Upon this 'death' is raised a power born of sacrifice that demands a joyless obedience masked perhaps in forms of kindness or mitigated from exposure of its underlying pain - and the hate or rage or fear that is associated there.
None of this has any real cultural understanding in a jack whose persona is manipulated, conformed and coerced to fit an inhuman sense of life - arbited by an elitism to which one cannot possibly engage in communication with - let alone challenge. For everything has been repackaged into complex financial or medical 'instruments' that are traded in a system that is rigged from behind the scenes to make sure clarity or indeed sanity cannot occur - and any instances that cannot be subverted to serve the existing model, will be walled out, demonised and invalidated.

So there is a basis for doing 'nothing' not even taking a placebo, when symptoms arise - in outward terms - while bringing a genuine willingness to notice, acknowledge and open to the symptoms - not just as presenting to initial interpretation - but as a result of an intimate defenceless communication. For there are 'layers' or facets of relational 'dis ease' that come up to be undone and released - simply by truly listening and living from the result of a real communication - that may include taking advices of any kind arising within that communication. And here there is a 'both/and' quality rather than an 'either/or' mind of invalidation and denial.

I don't suggest this is many people's current responsibility to live up to - in fact I don't have a sense of living up to so much as responsibility to align truly or honestly rather than being deceived by conditioned reactions that prevented me checking in to find out.

The dangers in the redefining of drug trials into terms of existing and distorted or filtered narratives of 'best treatment' will mean that bad things can be promoted as excellence relative to worse, and be sanctified by a 'focus on patients'. I see a reversal approach in yet another step that outsources our Life in pacts that draw us into ever deeper dependencies and indebtedness. Mario Negri may have all the best intentions but the principle expounded astounds me.

While in the field of psychological dysfunction - the principles embodied in the Open Dialogue approach (youtube) are what I would call revolutionary - or indeed open a truly evolutionary culture for attending health needs. The power relationship in psychiatry is of course different from medicine generally - but both are state protected and state sponsored - where the line between the Corporate Medical Establishment and the State is no clearer than the Banking sector - or for that matter the military industrial complex.

Statins are part of a mindset of engineering a revenue stream of power and influence - and the protection of that narrative to evidences dismissed as anecdotal or non-clinical is fraudulent or at best the addiction to a model in which one's reputation and status in society depends.

Too big too fail is becoming part of an increasing insane system that cannot or will not accept radical revisions. Being sick, impoverished and warring has become essential for the Economy that is poised to bring in a new world order where sickness and war will of course be eradicated. Well they wont. They will be much more deeply suppressed and channelled into regulatory sacrifice.

Utopia and dystopia go hand in hand when the invalidation of what is here is fuelling the assertion of a power that promises a better future. We can only really evolve what is here and what we have or we operate from a mis take that appeals because it hides what we don't want to know or feel.

I am not opposed to any modality of health care so much as open to a unified and integrative approach. What is best treatment for one may be toxic for another. Mere aggregates do not serve the individual situation and classification and diagnosis may no less serve the professionals anxiety appeasement to be able to seem to have answer rather than including "I/we do not know" as a valid and honest feedback to a request for help. Then working for the State or indeed under its dictates as arises in cancer treatments allowed or else... (UK) means one is not paid for or serving the patient's needs excepting as defined and determined by the State - (which is not so separate from pharmaceuticals and allied lobbies such as food processing industries).

Better than Nothing?

Further in the thread of commentary I blogged recently HERE

 Editorial 12 Apr 2016

A revolutionary approach to testing new drugs is not to use a placebo at all. Who wants to know if something is better than nothing? What you want to know is whether it is better than the best treatment currently available. This is what a wonderful patient oriented research clinic in Italy called Mario Negri does. For more details search for it on this site. It does something else even more radical and even more patient and community minded – it doesn’t take out any patents on the beneficial new molecules it finds.It makes them available to treat people. Utopian? Yes but also feasible. It has been going 60 years.

Firstly placebo is not 'nothing' and the belief it is 'nothings' the power or agency of Mind. The effects that are known to arise as a result of placebo are far ranging and indicate a link between expectations and brain and body function at the cellular level. Indeed psycho-emotional effect on the body are far reaching - and yet this is what 'traditional science' is dead set on denying - not least by defining everything in material organic terms that the 'person' or subjective response mechanism - is merely subjected to, imprinted or programmed by.
The 'best treatment currently available' is a highly contentious and debatable term. Medical history is littered with the best treatment available that is invariably invalidated by the superseding methods with the idea of 'progress' implicit.

My sense is that there is a significant underlay of unaddressed (read avoided and masked) relational issues - (psycho-emotional) that have cultural and social reinforcements leading to breakdowns of communication and functionality resulting in many patterns of 'dis ease' reflecting and embodying the relational issue.

As a brief pre-amble, consider that unresolved separation trauma is pushed or denied to the 'subconscious and unconscious' or denial habit and denied but active, and much of this is dumped in the body - being unable to move and find acceptance as communication. This essentially sets up a jack in the box of feared or negative threats and outcomes that mask themselves in all kinds of avoidance and displacement patterns - including sickness and susceptibility to sickness. This perspective is likely to trigger defensive rage in those who equate awakening responsibility with blame and penalty. Who find protection from deeper fears by which a propensity for guilt calls their integrity and validity into question. But with this temporary reprieve comes subjection to the 'power' that provides the protection.

When symptoms arise we are trained to fear something has gone wrong and to project the negative expectation forward and seek help to avoid that projection. This is the power of the mind-training of a fundamental distrust of self and Life - in short a communication breakdown of 'separation trauma' re-enacting itself.

One easy to observe experiment is to purposefully align with choosing to act on joyous choices that will inevitably open a truly joyous or unified sense of life and wellbeing - into which the separation-belief pattern interjects itself as a loss of power, worth, relationship, inspiration and perspective. Upon this 'death' is raised a power born of sacrifice that demands a joyless obedience masked perhaps in forms of kindness or mitigated from exposure of its underlying pain - and the hate or rage or fear that is associated there.
None of this has any real cultural understanding in a jack whose persona is manipulated, conformed and coerced to fit an inhuman sense of life - arbited by an elitism to which one cannot possibly engage in communication with - let alone challenge. For everything has been repackaged into complex financial or medical 'instruments' that are traded in a system that is rigged from behind the scenes to make sure clarity or indeed sanity cannot occur - and any instances that cannot be subverted to serve the existing model, will be walled out, demonised and invalidated.

So there is a basis for doing 'nothing' not even taking a placebo, when symptoms arise - in outward terms - while bringing a genuine willingness to notice, acknowledge and open to the symptoms - not just as presenting to initial interpretation - but as a result of an intimate defenceless communication. For there are 'layers' or facets of relational 'dis ease' that come up to be undone and released - simply by truly listening and living from the result of a real communication - that may include taking advices of any kind arising within that communication. And here there is a 'both/and' quality rather than an 'either/or' mind of invalidation and denial.

I don't suggest this is many people's current responsibility to live up to - in fact I don't have a sense of living up to so much as responsibility to align truly or honestly rather than being deceived by conditioned reactions that prevented me checking in to find out.

The dangers in the redefining of drug trials into terms of existing and distorted or filtered narratives of 'best treatment' will mean that bad things can be promoted as excellence relative to worse, and be sanctified by a 'focus on patients'. I see a reversal approach in yet another step that outsources our Life in pacts that draw us into ever deeper dependencies and indebtedness. Mario Negri may have all the best intentions but the principle expounded astounds me.

While in the field of psychological dysfunction - the principles embodied in the Open Dialogue approach (youtube) are what I would call revolutionary - or indeed open a truly evolutionary culture for attending health needs. The power relationship in psychiatry is of course different from medicine generally - but both are state protected and state sponsored - where the line between the Corporate Medical Establishment and the State is no clearer than the Banking sector - or for that matter the military industrial complex.

Statins are part of a mindset of engineering a revenue stream of power and influence - and the protection of that narrative to evidences dismissed as anecdotal or non-clinical is fraudulent or at best the addiction to a model in which one's reputation and status in society depends.

Too big too fail is becoming part of an increasing insane system that cannot or will not accept radical revisions. Being sick, impoverished and warring has become essential for the Economy that is poised to bring in a new world order where sickness and war will of course be eradicated. Well they wont. They will be much more deeply suppressed and channelled into regulatory sacrifice.

Utopia and dystopia go hand in hand when the invalidation of what is here is fuelling the assertion of a power that promises a better future. We can only really evolve what is here and what we have or we operate from a mis take that appeals because it hides what we don't want to know or feel.

I am not opposed to any modality of health care so much as open to a unified and integrative approach. What is best treatment for one may be toxic for another. Mere aggregates do not serve the individual situation and classification and diagnosis may no less serve the professionals anxiety appeasement to be able to seem to have answer rather than including "I/we do not know" as a valid and honest feedback to a request for help. Then working for the State or indeed under its dictates as arises in cancer treatments allowed or else... (UK) means one is not paid for or serving the patient's needs excepting as defined and determined by the State - (which is not so separate from pharmaceuticals and allied lobbies such as food processing industries).

Conflicting mindshare, False stats and side effect by design

Companies clash over statin side effects. Which is lying? By Jerome Burne

My main comment to the article above:

Waking up to treachery and deceit by which such suffering is doled out and suckled on as 'help', is disturbing - and the apparent inability to simply correct the error adds to this sense of powerlessness. Because no one is able to publicly come out without meeting blanking, ridicule or invalidation, and denial in ways that cause many to withhold natural and needful communication because it can attract penalty from vested power interests.

But we educate ourselves, grow in vigilance and discernment and withdraw allegiance from dodgy, deceitful or destructive agenda  while truing up from a clearer sense of purpose and more conscious communication. For  communication is feared or there would not be such distortions and censorship (whether actively imposed on media and other institutions or self-imposed within a tacitly communicated fear of crossing the line and attracting financial sanction, legal suits or other kinds of penalty. But allowing for personal compromise to silence those who should report and witness for society at large there is still a very destructive corporate pharmocracy that has only been insinuating itself more insidiously into our thinking since Thomas S. Szasz coined the term back in 1960.
Behind the FORMS of the world we think we know is a power agenda of very clever but unfeeling mentality. The idea of deceiver is not new  but the technological reach of destructive agenda in all of our expanded abilities is global  as is the prize for those who take idea out of living context and force it on the living or force the living to conform and suffer it. I dont really see profit as the motive  but the ownership of market  which is mindshare and indeed mindcontrol or social engineering. Power corrupts  it goes to the head and loses the heart  unless clearly held in real relationship of transparency and accountability. Ive ranted on here  I meant to recommend the perspectives and work of Stephanie Seneff, note the film Stain Nation, and indeed You Must Be Nuts  and to remember that hatred is also toxic  and so research and grow in health from the ground up  because the top-down has been compromised, and corrupted. We give power to external agencies to make symptoms go away or mitigate them while persisting the same freedom to live out-of-true and outsource the costs and consequence until it comes home. There is no blame in my saying this because we do not know what we do when our OWN thinking is compromised and protected from anything that seems to threaten our world.

David Bailey (to the article):

I guess this leaves one interesting question. How did researchers come up with evidence that statin side effects and placebo side effects were approximately equal? These were sufficient to fool Ben Goldacre -normally a severe critic of the drug industry.

... Nowadays, when drugs are approved even if they only have marginal value, is it possible that placebos are concocted to produce a small amount of the very problem the drug is supposed to cure/prevent!

My response:

As I see it, the active placebo effect  where some bodily response "tells you" that the drug is working such as a dry throat, is known to have a greater result than say a sugar pill alone. Drug companies also utilize this in their "real medicines".

I have the distinct impression that drug companies often set up their trial parameters in such a way as to distort the results  So the placebo used may be inactive and the trial drug  say fluoxetine (prozac) is adulterated with active extras that "tell" the subject that the drug is "working".

There are a whole range of tricks that clever people routinely do to sell what otherwise would be less wanted, unwanted or indeed criminal to purvey.

The key points I see are that data, to have any scientific credibility, must be open, and that the trials really need to be independent of the drug company influence - which is a trillion dollar distortion field. How could it NOT be?

Our modern society is built on "getting" while avoiding being "got from". And is no basis for whole or healthy anything  nor one in which healing or reintegrating modalities and perspectives can grow and fruit. This calls on a profound paradigm shift in our core self definitions as to who we are and what life is for.

If the foundation is corrupt - everything built upon it - no matter how well intentioned  follows suit.

One can petition inherently corrupt institutions to deliver fairness or just and honest service and communication  and fight the lack of this in law to some degree - and there are ways of doing this that share true witness rather than pursue a merely private agenda  but the desire and willingness to uncover a true foundation is discerning what truly resonates your integrity rather than handing all power over to experts - who may yet be worthy advisers to your informed decision.

Is sickness an absence of drugs? Is pre-emptive sacrifice for the sake of reducing risk of fear-mongered conditions - the true causes of which are not investigated or published, a worthy or sane response?

If power and wealth is so disproportionately distributed, it belies that the vast majority want to give it away - or rather use others as their protector and guide rather than awaken their own responsibilities. And those riding the wave encourage it and and are encouraged  even demanded  to persist. How insane can insane get before it can no longer mask as sanity - and therefore attract allegiance? They say everyone has their breaking point - but dissociation can fragment into less and less consciousness operating more and more regulated existence - perhaps without ever breaking ranks to question its reality.

("Anatomy of an Epidemic by Robert Whitaker" is a worthy perspective upon the psychopharma drug approach and its consequences that has relevance to the broader pharma practices and underlying social beliefs that support them).

Outsorcery of symptoms

Authorities Plan Strategic Attack of Anti-Vaccine “Myths”
By Daily Bell Staff

My Comment:

Corporations "outsource the costs" while increasing 'profits' and establishing revenue streams - that is power operating to set up and maintain 'markets of dependency'.

Humanity and the living environment on which we all depend is relegated to a status of 'collateral damage' whose only 'real' existence is on the balance sheet - as a cost to be outsourced as far as is possible.

Pharma operates punishment presented as reward for the criminalisation of the population by decree of a condition of disease demanding eradication and control extending its power as fear of future sickness, to be pre-emptively struck or denied.

It is humanity that is being denied its relation within wholeness, it is humanity that is sacrificed upon the altar of a god of sickness and death, for the illusion of power over life - life that is conceived in hated, and feared as corruption of failure and inadequacy and weakness - to be forced out and conformed to a world order in which life will no longer have the capacity to interfere or drag down the vision of unchecked power.

"God's death" - through the sacrifice of innately shared relational Creation is the energy source for such power. But the stark insanity of this suicide is hidden to the urge to regress to the illusion of the self-concept that seems to have had a perfection before life happened. This identity in concept, is belief in fixed self, over and against movement, and operates against the flow of its own fulfilment. This is the father of all lies and unless this is noticed, recognized and released, the war against Self, perpetuates itself, in futility of pain - no matter how 'outsourced' disguised, or redefined, by a splitting off of the idea in power upon its unrecognized and hated Self.

In the sense of a living immediate responsibility was it said you are a 'sinner' - in error - not fixed in concept of unchangeable guilt. Power in concept used a simple waking call to serve its own hate agenda.

That such sin of guilt in self of love and life was rationalised to scapegoat religious corruption, set the scene for a deeper denser illusion of power-seduction, in arrogance and ignorance of the deceit - operating the engine of one's own destruction, willingly.

Where once everyone was held to be a 'sinner' now we almost all have human disorder disorders - which are made up 'diseases'! But pharmacologically enforced so as to generate iatrogenic chains of sickness, death and unfailing loyalty to the god of such a system - for to resist or challenge it in any way, is to demonstrate the state of a disease disorder and be conformed.

The error upon which human consciousness operates in hidden obeisance to an imprinted conditioning is not in the world - but gives rise to a way of perceiving the mutually defied and agreed 'world' that has substituted for life - just as false currency substitutes for a shared presence of true worth and value.

Another word for hate is blame. If perspectives voiced here only reiterate the same ancient hating blame - then whatever forms are asserted or denied - make no difference to the core 'dis-ease of self-sickness.

Conversion of 'hysteria' - that is of unfaced or unfaceable fear - into physical metaphor is part of the unconscious pallet from which fragmentation and control operate in place of a spontaneity and ease of being. This is not merely a recent Freudian "discovery" - but is a much deeper pattern in consciousness by which to maintain unconsciousness of the hated and feared. Outsorcery projectes in attempt to protect - but true source embraces a movement of reintegration of re-wakened self-whole responsibility. The urge and roles of protection may be in error or of an out-dated temporary expediency - but if they are not honoured for what they are believed to serve - one will always elicit attack and denial from such guards.

As is readily observable in issues of power/fear conflict, the way in which outcomes are arrived is hidden by focussing in the conditioned meanings ascribed to forms of the outcomes. Mindfulness could be used to pertain to the presence of awareness at the point of focusing - rather than the loss of such awareness to reactive identity within the experience such meanings generate.

The issue is not vax/anti vax. The issue is an honouring relational communication as the basis from which a trusted outcome arises. To force a belief or deceit of 'good' on others against their willingness is an act of hate - no matter how it presents itself. It is not possible to know or share love in existence while actively hating - and without the unifying perspective of wholeness of being - all parts become as warring factions - even reflecting in the war or breakdown of communication within our own body - where we now have immune function attacking Self as an increasingly 'normal' state of dysfunction - perhaps served by the life-fearing and hating attempt to coerce the immune system mixing all kinds of non-human pathogens with highly toxic 'immune-activators'. Ignorance and arrogance - that refuses to recognize its own feedback - but outsources it to justify ever more intrusive control.

"The patient died - but we got the cancer!" - is the victory cry of 'war on symptoms' - regardless what symptoms are scapegoated to fuel the diversion. Wake up Hu-Man. If you will.

Don't be caught napping!

So-called 'news' media are a point of insertion for 'studies' and 'trial results' to drip into the directed narrative in contrived ways to prepare and seed private agenda that otherwise would not result.

This was medicalising and demonising afternoon napping

My comment:
Medicalizing society is subjugating, making docile and controlling society.
The fraudulent nature of so many 'trials' is well documented by such courageous communicators as Robert Whitaker or our own Dr David Healy. (go youtube) The planting of cherry picked and predetermined scripts into the newsfeeds is always PR or advertorial to more than just profits - for the capture of regulatory bodies means that cynical fraud can hide behind 'clinical' expertise.
These are the people who bought you the demonisation of saturated fats that are essential to health (and brain health). The hoax of chemical imbalance in the brain as the 'medical' cause of emotional and psychological distress or difficulty. The false association of cholesterol with heart disease - and the demonisation and fear of Sunlight!
In short, the actual result of much health - or should we say sickness management - is to make us sick - and make us fear sickness even when taking a nap!
Unbelieveable! - Excepting people DO believe it at some level because they have a fear of self-responsibility and therefore trust the 'parenting' institutions that have largely been subverted by trillion dollar publicity and marketing expertise.

Reversing the reversal?

 Watered down medical innovation bill passes into English/Welsh law

A new Bill has passed into English/Welsh law to promote access to innovative medical treatments
This is a new, modified version of Lord Saatchi’s original well-intended, but controversial Medical Innovation Bill
In this new guise, the authorities carry a loaded gun to point at any doctor given that the doctor will remain liable if he/she is found to be negligent in carrying out the innovative treatment
All innovative treatments and outcomes will be recorded in a new Medical Innovation Register that’s effectively a fast-track licensing system for new drugs and those that have been used off-label
The chosen innovative treatment must be supported by a responsible body of medical opinion, i.e. a team of doctors all agreeing on the same course of action
Innovative treatment will typically be off-label use of an existing drug
Sick and vulnerable patients will effectively be test subjects, and their outcomes will inform clinical trials for wider pharma markets
The structure of this Bill has effectively closed the door to natural treatments, whether they be innovative or not

My Comment:

State control of health issues and denial of freedom to explore or integrate non-pharmacological approaches has nothing to do with science and everything to do with the corruption of the State by transnational corporate lobbies – after first subverting and corrupting scientific institutions and media.
The extension of the idea of owning and controlling our biology and environment is the logical outcome of a directed technocratic behaviourism – in which faulty and unworthy broken bio-robots – have to be manually overridden of their own will so as to farm them.
The ‘elitists’ are a ‘power class’ who have corresponding privilege, insider knowledge and protections that they are unwilling to lose – and so no real opening to change a system of maintaining division and control will be allowed – for any crack in the dam would open up more – and the loss of such control is terrifyingly unthinkable and avoided at any cost.
Anecdotally – the film “Cancer is a serious business” that documents coercion and fraud – was raised in discussion in the highest office of the USA – but was simply ‘too big’ to go into or open up. “Too big to fail” is the sense of tares entangling the wheat that dare not be addressed for fear the whole economy and power system as we have known it – disintegrates or ‘goes down’. And of course too many vested interests will move to block or counter any reform.
Regaining our own ‘inner track’ of power has to begin by opening and owning our fears rather than demanding another power ‘save us’ from them. No one else can stop a true willingness to learn; to transform and to heal or reintegrate to a wholeness of being – but the guilted and fearfully split sense of self we are conditioned to normalize and persona-fy is not the basis for such a movement of being. Aligning in a true movement of being is different from fear-fuelled ‘power’ or wilfulness upon life. Listening Within is not mad! It is refusing a false-faced normalcy in hate for a clear and true perspective that can only be had by allowing it in – by receiving. And listening within will include noticing promptings and intuitive recognitions ‘without’ or in the ideas or people or situation we attract into our lives – because we are desirous of a truly integrated outcome – whether we are denied a fullness of cultural exchange or not.


Also from http://anhinternational.org:

Tribeca censorship of "Vaxxed" and how to beat it

My Comment:

Recognize that coercive assertion is hate - no matter what symbols it appeals to for legitimizing itself. No matter what forms it adopts. For it listens not and cares not for anything but its own blinded sense of self interest.

The compulsive dictate of a hateful intent is not recognized by those who believe it protects them - or 'others' in such ways as empowers them. But is ascribed to those who would bring it to light and to being healed - and then righteously directed at them as if in retaliation.

"What we believe - and insist you also believe (or conform your behaviour to), cannot be brought to question - or we accuse you of crimes against humanity - for our belief is saving lives while anything that contradicts it puts them all at risk".

Clearly this is an issue of power to 'medicate' people without their truly informed consent - because without discussion, there can be neither information accountable to truth or meaningful consent.

If there is such overwhelming science to back up the claims of the vaxing of otherwise healthy people for diseases they may still contract and spread to others - with actual risks that are downplayed or airbrushed from the record - and a legal system designed to release them from accountability - why is it asserted with such force as if it is fragile and easily undermined? Because it is?

Pharmaceutical rape

Pharmaceutical rape pt.1 by Laurie Oakley

After reading the article featured in Dr David Healy's blog, I commented into its conversation:



I have been educating myself in bridging issues of integrity in observed consciousness (the only one I have ;-) with reflections in our world - of collective consciousness.  There are many destructive and deceitful arenas active within a cultivated normalcy of social invisibility that include medicalisation of our consciousness, of our body; our biology - including toxic exposures and bio-technological interventions to our environment - that themselves are symptomatic of a corruption of the currency of our thinking - such that a pervasive 'institutional' disease embodies a distorted human consciousness - socially and culturally disposed to deny and hide the true power of communication - such that any movement to embody or give witness to a true communication - in feeling and form - will not only meet suppression but which has a conditioned inhibition against being spoken or heard.
I appreciate this article. I support THAT we feel outrage where it is sane and healthy to feel it - and that use this to find communication rather than be baited or triggered into conditioned reaction - which is easily manipulated and used against us.
Trust has been established with regard to a scientific and medical establishment by which we abnegate our responsibility - our voice - our consciousness of discernment - for  external 'authorities' who likewise are conditioned to follow edicts coming from what is effectively a closed cabal of private interests that hide within our wishful worship of science as saviour, like Trojans in a wooden horse. Not that integrity in consciousness is anything but scientific in its willingness for uncovering and sharing fresh perspectives within the already true - but that dis-integrity of consciousness operates a segregative mentality - that is in a sense - held private or masked from open communication so as to engage in power over upon what would otherwise be relationship. Fantasy personae act out unconscious or denied fear and rage - with al the force of such denials.
Sooner or later, if we value consciousness of shared and felt existence, the unseen role of denial has to be addressed and I believe that addressing it politically, socially and individually is one purpose - but that to only address the external symptoms is yet to be diverted from an inner recognition of our re-integrative sanity by a hate hidden in righteousness.
The corruption of consciousness could be summarized as hate, justified and hidden beneath the masking appearance of righteousness. There is nothing new about the mind's capacity to deceive. But Culture in its true sense is our sense of worth and purpose embodied - and this is always something to rediscover anew - or else we fall asleep in forms and appearances that invite and are open to 'other' purposes of ungrounded and un-relational fantasy to usurp.
I didn't know what I would write in joining with this article in spirit - but I share a willingness to find Voice - to find ways of communicating, owning and addressing, that which a loveless and dysfunctional definition of ourselves gives rise to. This calls for a pause from what and who and where our current sense of ourself operates from. For listening within rather than reaction. Perhaps only the revealing or revisiting of traumatic imprinting will allow this willingness to listen - for who 'already knows' has no need to listen - and so operate a mind they think their own - and yet is it their consciousness of presence or is it the mask of adaptation to a 'loveless and fearful world'?

There is an underlying unifying issue in the article that I  recognize - and that is the reclaiming and voicing of the power of communication within a psuedo-culture that has been conditioned NOT to recognize it as communication - because it is already invested in issues of the denial and control of an imposed narrative upon communication, as its identity.
I don't feel to use the term rape in this context - but I see that the imposition or assertion of a deceit or coercive force is NOT a true willingness of communication and indicates a fear or hatred OF relationship itself.
So the 'power' that is enacted on the sacrifice of relational (Life) is not true power but a deceit of un-owned fear, rage and associated sense of Life-denial.
I agree that 'war on is a false framing by which futility and tragedy of perpetual war is guaranteed. (to paraphrase your sentiment!).

I feel to join with you in valuing our own individual responsibility for the language we use - so as to wake up from being conformed by it's shifting and indeterminate usage and be definite as to what we are voicing - regardless whether we uncover new information that revises anything we have said. Then we are extending our presence rather than 'just' voicing opinion. There's a different ring to presence than a presentation couched in 'acceptable' forms. If you don't feel the communication of integrity when living your own - as best you have of it - then be ware! But this is not our cultural conditioning - is it! - We are generally told to 'trust' and conform to - and not challenge or question.

The Emporer's New Drugs

Kelly Brogan is an articulate and energetically communicative voice for functional approaches to medicine - This was one of many videos of hers I dropped in on - that touches on the false and failed paradigm of pharmacological intervention as the basis and exclusive model of defining and addressing sickness.
And it prompted these responses.

An overview on the Emperor's New Drugs is very readably conveyed in "Anatomy of an Epidemic" by Robert Whitaker. Stephanie Seneff's approach uncovers the positive attempts of the body to maintain function amidst scarcity, stress and dysfunction. Rather than seeing a system as something to be fixed, recognizing a living relational intelligence that we can align with rather than work against in blind belief we are 'fixing it'. Fear grows out of control when 'fixed' by masking or hiding its symptoms. The emperor's fig leaf thinking operates the denial and suppression of the Obvious in the fearful belief that exposure = shame and pain and loss of self. We have to give ourself permission to Feel what we feel and find within that movement a better perspective than a false and blind sense of 'control - of the hateful or unwanted, that now threatens Our Biosphere as well as the capacity to embody true Consciousness of Life on Earth.ˇ˛


This writing unfolded from a phrase Kelly said about not knowing how the gut does what it does. Maybe it doesn't resonate with you. That's ok. Go with what does.
The link between thought - and I mean emotion backed thought - not conceptual narcissism - and the body/world reflection/response is generally hidden from us - partly because focusing in the thought of independence from and dominion OVER Life, NEEDS it hidden in order to have that experiential perspective. And so what we often believe and engage in as thought - which I just called conceptual narcissism, operates to mask the relational awareness of true communication - and the mask is the screen of a constantly shifting narrative that reflects and projects the idea of power to determine and to define, to predict and to control.
Emotions are response to definitions accepted or focussed in thought that then elicit a body reinforcement - the mental, emotional and physical operating as one purpose of an experience of unfolding Purpose or Spirit. When emergent self concept is overwhelmed or unbalanced in its capacity to receive and express the emotional charge, its assertion and defence generates a split Mind with denied or suppressed Feeling that is backed up upon the Feeling Will as a sense of oppositional Will that must be denied by a mis-identifying self-concept and effectively forced onto Body. Now is there the reconfiguring of the emotional and physical body and from the function of reinforcement and embodiment of the focus in thought into the role of blameworthy block to re-creational desire and the cause of dissonance, imbalance. But the effects are in fact faithful feedback to a mind that is narcissistically fascinated in its own thought - as if to separate off from relational 'disturbance and hold a private assertion of self above all else.
To the self-concept, anything that cannot be accounted for in terms of predictability and control, is dangerous, and so regardless of whether anything is actually true, it has to first find conformity within a pattern of thought to have acceptance. meanwhile the assertions of control and the stifling of spontaneity of feeling and being to conformity increase unpredictability and loss of control - escalating to crisis in which either a re-integrative shift of self-concept opens a healed perspective or an reinforced self-concept further fragments into density of denial, fear and control.
I began writing this because the subtler communications of the Bodymind - are aligned with and one with our Felt Existence. To reclaim or restore to a conscious awareness that had become defined by a conceit of private conceptual assertions - regardless how socially 'consensual' such agreements and definitions are in asserting and defending 'private minds'.
Disembodied thinking is not thinking but an idea of reversal and regression that meets an experience of 'dead matter' and random mutations as a chaos to be mapped, tamed and replaced with a model of ... manual control over Life - which taken to its conclusion is a victory in death. "We got the cancer - even if we couldn't save the patient!"
Re-connecting to and reintegration with true Feeling is the awakening of the true Feminine - of receptivity AND reflectivity. Embodying a true reflection is a balance in the heart of gut feeling that is received in the mind as fully felt Life embodiment - in which the sense of self is defined within Life's Living relational being rather than conceived as something apart and imposed upon the Flow of Communication.
Listening to gut intuition, heart intuition and higher mind intuition - as one embodiment is a different quality of focus than our habitual model. But we are inherently a focus of communication within a Field of Communication that has seemingly lost the capacity to Feel that quality of communication as a result of a strange kind of thinking arising out of an imprint of overwhelmed dissociation.
The 'state of our world' is increasingly revealing our separation trauma to us - and the dissociative attempts to 'control' it. This is the call and the opportunity for healing an Ancient misidentification within a Felt willingness in which symptoms become messengers rather than enemies.