Showing posts with label scapegoat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scapegoat. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

But Who Wants Peace?

crakinshot"Boris Johnson has called for the presumption of innocence to be reversed"

Quite possibly the scariest policy I've ever heard a politician (with power) come up with.

LondonsEye crakinshot 26 August 2014 12:44pmHe was referring to the Jihadists returning back to Britain. Not your normal everyday joe living in the UK, don't take it out of context!



My reply to LondonsEye

You are aware that 'anti' terrorist laws and procedures have become simply part of a mindset that is NOT confined to a specific context?

That the definition of 'terrorist' is expanded and in effect redefined to mean whatever the existing or established 'power of the day' determines it to mean?

If anything or anyone for any reason is determined to be a threat of any kind and for any reason deemed in the notional interest - then they can become the recipient of dehumanising actions and intent.

I declare that we are not defined by what others have 'done' unto us or unto our loved ones, but by what we choose to give. It is by what proceeds 'out from our own mouth' (mind) that we are corrupted.

Is 'your normal everyday joe living in the UK', a conditioned and manipulatable part of a 'bot-net' whereby the very few act upon the very many as if to represent the authority of the whole?

The 'holy war against jihadists' operates an example of using the hated scapegoat to invoke and acquire the power that is willingly given to the scapegoat by those who have been baited and triggered into fear.

A cunning device that is used over and over and over without anyone noticing, because the fearful WANT to direct their hatred and fear AWAY from themselves. In order to take it out of true context and act it out upon a world of judged against 'others'.

Cast ye the first stone who is without sin!

Even as ye do unto the least of my brethren, ye do unto Me.

To truly enter into a process of communication must be willing to be uncovered in our OWN dissonance and misalignment of self.

The extension of a clear and true presence does not require or employ coercion, nor evoke in others the reactions to a sense of being coerced.

But who wants peace?

Monday, 25 August 2014

Guilty until proven innocent - reversed consciousness

Johnson calls for 'guilty until proven innocent' for suspected terrorists

Mayor of London says ‘minor’ law change should reverse presumption of innocence for those who travel to Iraq and Syria

- - -
#1
There is a way of looking at Everything that presumes it guilty first and then decides whether it can be used to promote one's private agenda or not.
This mentality runs somewhat secretly in most of us - unless so blinded by self-righteous hatred that we openly display it as if fully justified.
From it's perspective, everything that threatens or is not useful to its agenda is an adversary or adversity to be overcome. It uses whatever means are available to achieve its goals by persuasion, stealth and guile, or coercion.
It is incapable of communication - for communication is redefined by such a mentality as a means to get something or get someone to do or not do something and 'listens' only so far as to determine threat levels, and neutralise them - along with turning any form of the communication into ammunition for its own agenda.

I am describing a mentality that we can all recognize in ourselves - but which is in most of us recognised to be deceptive and mean-spirited or fearful. There is a growing embodiment of such mentality in our world - and while we consent to be fear-driven, it seems to shepherd us as if to protect us from our fears.

recognising a fearful and deceptive mentality becomes the basis of choosing NOT to use it - and pausing so as to discern a better way.
There is always a better way that acting out from a negatively defined sense of one's self - and that is from the willingness for a reintegrated sense of self.

That which we hate in others is that which we hate in our self. In the shadow of our own fear we hurt ourselves over, and over, and over again.

Therefore own our fears honestly and be willing to learn from them. This does not mean the lack of a firm and clear capacity to say NO! to unacceptable behaviour.

Are we to become the thing we hate... a terror state…?

- - -
#2
Johnson said most Britons wanted “someone to come along with a bunker buster” and kill the man, reported to be British, “as fast as possible”.

But is not THAT precisely the aim and purpose of the video… to provoke such self-righteous hatred along with a blank cheque as to how it is used?
I am not an expert on Psy-ops but until a full investigation reveals the full facts, I see propaganda being propagated regardless of what those facts turn out to be - if they are ever discovered and published.

Those who WANT a war-mind are those who see it as furthering their own private agenda. If a majority of the population WANTS to be cathartically manipulated as if to scapegoat and kill their 'hates and fears', then they will choose to be so deceived to serve their own private agenda of remaining 'unconscious' and not responsible FOR that consciousness.


Wanting someone or something ELSE to make the bad feelings go away is the device by which evil seems to come into our world as a PROTECTION from a deeper fear. This is inherently a mentality of deception… "the lie and the father of the lie". If we personalise evil, we do so in order in order to separate from a mistaken sense of our SELF.


#3
Radicalise is another name for polarise. There is nothing accidental about the concerted drive to bait populations into polarised and conflicted sense of themselves and their world.
Divide and rule has another polarity - and that is unify and communicate.
Denying the humanity in others is very likely to eventually make them cancerous to the whole - that is to seek out their own needs from under a sense of being denied by the whole.

Many 'in power' are seeking to act AS IF they represent and control in the name of the Whole - but they do not - or they would not need to use deception and force to achieve their/our aims. This kind of 'power' is also known as corruption, because a sense of wholeness of self is consumed and replaced by a hollowness of fearful disguise - that may promise all kinds of rewards, yet delivers only evaporations of indebtedness.

#4 - in reply to:
BigFrankSFCan anyone imagine this buffoon running this country? the stuff nightmares are made of.


The US had 'Dubya' for a two terms, (before flipping to a seeming opposite polarity), so in that sense yes I can. An actor merely has to be able to play their part. Do you honestly believe 'leaders' are running their countries?

Nightmares are when what once seemed solid and rational suddenly shifts into a deceptive quagmire from which one cannot escape - not least because a dream never was what it seemed, and the persona that operates within it never was the one that makes the script.


Nightmares are (made of) unfaced fear. The personae often represent those aspects of ourself we have not yet recognised and reintegrated and focusing on personae operates as a way of protecting the fear from exposure.