Abiding in Integrity of being

Abiding in Integrity of being

 in response to the themes in:
https://mikestone.substack.com/p/debunking-the-funk/

(Remaining in integrity when meeting an intent to undermine, attack or invalidate the messenger as a means to block a message without engaging in communication).

 

It may seem like you stand in a cesspit, but you stand in the truth as long as you don't accept the framing of self-deceit as anything worthy of engaging in.
The wisest path I feel, is to see the assertion or claim for existence as an offer, that you provisionally accept, subject to receiving supported answers to a list of reasonable questions that would then validate the claim. Without which the offer is left unsupported and of no substance as a basis in law.
If you make counterclaim, you present a claim that can be required to likewise be challenged or called to account - not just with clear questions that could be answered, but into every kind of trick, trap and burden on your time, energy and resources.
Likewise for all of us who are not only unconvinced of virology's basis and its offshoots such as vaccines - but are aware of many fraudulent claims. A sense of moral outrage can be quick to react in counter-claim that them initiated a 'battle of wills' or polarised defence against an enemy - which is unproductive and actually protects the issues for m being investigated due to the invested identity in an outcome.
I would encourage NOT to merely assert non- existence as if 'we are right and they are wrong' as if persisting the same position 'should win' when it becomes tedious or going over and over the same points. This means to integrate and expand our own sense of the issue in all of its many aspects by teaching it.
This also becomes an ongoing education that opens both personal understanding and appreciation as well as sharing and growing in a culture of worth. Otherwise we grow an anti-culture or identity that fixates on what we don't want as a basis to get what we think we want (ie self-vindication).
As for engaging with abuse, I feel that if people resort to such reactions and persist after some reflection or notification of it invalidity as a communication - then there is no relationship, and no call to answer or persist in a pretense that masks as communication in order to hijack the mind and replicate its 'thinking'. There's your 'virus'. We can be certain it is out there seeking to get us because we automatically project our own intentions to others, as if real if we still engage such manipulation and believe it real.
Contagion is a subset of communication - indeed a reception to transmission. This has been applied to ideas sin who knows when, and is akin to the idea of corruption. There is a realm of antecedence to the 'rational projection of virus particles' that is avoided within a science that has been trained to discard, downplay of dismiss Mind, the Psyche or Soul as a form of immunisation against communication unless it supports the current rules and filters of assertions running as 'self-evident reality'. So I would use 'the virus' issue as a means to look at our mind, our thinking and our emotionally invested identity. For this is where the error can be addressed or revealed to a shifted perception of self, life and world - which is each other.

Everything scripted-but to a revealing or unmasking or reality?

Iain Davis
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/bbc-musk/
There is a whiff of desperation in the air and it is emanating from the BBC. In a car crash of an interview, reminiscent of Kathy Newman's self-immolating attempt to shoot down Jordan Peterson for Channel 4, the BBC’s North America Technology reporter, James Clayton,

 

My assumption is that it was in some sense set up. (?)
How or in what way and under what narrative assumptions - who knows?
But the energetic of any charged situation cannot be static, and beneath all appearances are toxic conflicts of entanglement that are no less active for being repackaged as 'solutions' at expense of a felt consciousness of life. So the 'Matrix' is a virtual mental substitution extended to & in some sense reflected as - our world experience.

At some level I take a 'God's Plan" perspective; a Script is playing out that reveals the split mind by which self-illusion is acted out on bodies as a 'getting mode' or 'defence system'.
Such as to 'break' the spell and move within as an agency of curiosity and desire - but initially framed within deeper assumptions or definitions and beliefs as to who and what we are and what (our) life is.
So facing - rather than giving a blind eye to - who and what we are not, is a negative experience in that it is owning suppressed emotional conflicts as part of turning from a desire to self-evasion or masking & dissociating unconsciousness. BUT this is the willingness to question beyond what we presume to know, and thus open resources we didn't know we have, that includes a quality of grounded awareness from which to discern within life rather than judge as if set over (or under) and apart from life. yet such qualities of being are not within the bounds of 'control' yet do hold a field of support and guidance as a capacity to recognise how to be in relational honesty and equity - as we relearn to trust the nature of our being directly.
I didn't say we wont die in the sense of life in the body! But that never was the problem, so much as became the result of fearing truth as a result of grasping self illusion and becoming locked down in guilted fear.

What is the underlying pattern of manipulative and coercive deceits but guilted fear?
As we learn to recognise the 'gaslighting' signature regardless the forms it takes, we are releasing the liability of accepting or engaging in its 'offers'.

I feel that personal judgements are very likely to be where truth is hidden - because what we hate or are ashamed of in ourself is what we most cast out and wall out. Not to say we need engage in blame but seeking a true responsibility for our thoughts, emotional results and shared meaning or cultural expression.

Fascination with horror, and addiction the the 'dynamics' of conflict serve to keep self-masking defences operating against what we are or were not ready or willing to accept or see. No one can force or make another see what they are not willing to see. Nor need they. But even as we engaged in mutual entanglements of projected fears or mistakenly assumed responsibilities that are not ours, so is there a relational gift to the release of deeper grievances and strategies that are recognised to no longer serve who we accept ourselves to be now.
A love of humanity is fundamentally a quality of recognition of life within - such that regardless our current appearances, we know something truly worthy abides within - as a potential that does shine forth in various moments of sharing in the gift of love. Not the manipulative masking in the forms or masking passing as love, but a genuine extension of presence that shares a Field - not just an 'information'.

The masked and distanced 'join in fear' (on any side of a conflict) - which is a false unity dependent on the threat or evil that is joined against. There is no true intimacy in it - but that if the threat is no more, the bond is undone. the apparent order is based on hidden hate - that rises in ever shifting 'variants' to necessitate sacrifice for boosting the framework that 'makes us safe' from Disclosure to truth -feared as worse than death - because death becomes the 'escape' or 'triumph' against utter loss of face - whether by abnegating will to 'others' or conditions' or locking into death in conflict as defiance. But as I intimate, there is a universal will that is unconflicted or integrative. I don't see we need to believe in it, but to not be actively believing against it. Willingness to find a way together has the spark of recognising another as our self. Each uniquely expressing life in free association.
How can our 'private sense of control' not see love as threat or sacrifice? yet the 'control mind is perpetual war set in sacrifice of love's presence now. So there's a choice!