An editorial on the Daily Bell:
What Exactly is Racism?
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Fear-ism operates a coercive and self-differentiating identity. It does so through any and every segregative identity.
Identities of fear-ism are ever shifting alliances and oppositions in which war is the basis for the protection and persistence of the "shadow power" of fear-ism.
The complexity of such disguise is such that it is impossible to establish and maintain communication long enough for the fear-ism to be exposed - as an act of will. For an act of will always embodies some aspect of shadow power - or unconscious hidden agenda - that then works against communication.
There is no ism for love, hence it is not within the radar of fear-mindedness and is thus deemed unreal, weak, inneffective and illusory. However, it operates beneath the radar in disguise that may seem to be enslaved and controlled, and harvested - not least because the denial of love is the only power source that fear-ism has - being an inversion of true creation within a collective mind-agreement.
The fearful identity is lacking true Identity - which only love can give and which love only gives. Guilting and invalidation is the conditioning by which one's natural being is demonized and a 'protector' mask-identity raised upon the 'death' of the true hearted communion within Life.
It is all very well to put everything of such nature in terms of what others, or society, or the human condition or God or any other notion of power - DID unto us, but such victim-assertion looks only OUT at the manifestations of the template of core beliefs of self definition that were chosen prior to 'entrancing' the human lifetime.
It is not true that we choose our lives - at the level of the masking or personality level of asserted identity. But even at that level, are choices being made that can be shown and seen to be working against our good while seeming to at first be for our good.
Thus a willingness for pause from reaction, in which a deeper or more honest and direct communication can occur, opens the way for a reintegrative movement of consciousness. For what seems fragmented and at war within itself - and thus reflected as our world-experience, is a very specific focus of choices operating within ONE mind to facilitate experiential learning FOR the desire to know oneself - which is moving in and as all that Is.
Because, we are suffering the results of choices - albeit many of which are invisibly below our current noticing - because our beliefs and self-definitions are unquestioned and perhaps heavily defended against question, there is the freedom to own or uncover such choices within our consciousness - where automatically and spontaneously is the innate capacity to choose anew - from a truly consciousness perspective - that 'fear-simulated' substitute no longer hides.
The father of the lie is the assertion of being attacked, wounded and offended, with NO correlation to one's own conscious thought, intent or act. The splitting into levels and facets of consciousness is the cost of being ignorant of one's own self-attack. But should anyone complain of a dissonance and discover it is but the result of their own posture - they would merely realign and be finished with it in a moment. Hence the projection of hate and evil away from the self onto the other, so as to persist out of true while seeming not to suffer the cost - at least for a time - until it all comes home.
Individual and collective uniqueness can serve the recognition of the Infinite Creator in All - rather than the scapegoat of projected fear upon which to make a 'special self'. The opportunity to obey and reactively persist in fear-ism, is the opportunity to notice and relinquish it in willingness to re-member love's presence and be re-minded within consciousness. Suppression of the symptoms under guilt and fear is the device by which error is protected from correction.
Correction or realignment to one's core joy, is the absense of coercion and cannot be effected BY coercion. The means and the end are one, so whatever one notices as one's means - will only fruit a like goal. There is no loveless path to love excepting to thoroughly exhaust oneself of any capacity to tolerate lovelessness of self.
Shadow power or manipulating deceit false-flags its own attack to maintain a self-special identity from which to draw willing sacrificial obeisance. This device is pervasive to human consciousness up to Friday, June 26, 2015 - as we each and together define, accept, think, perceive, act and experience ourself to be. But that is all predicated on choices - no matter how well hidden are such choices by falsely framed narratives.
Do we identify in our story or our presence? Are we aware of our true presence? Are we aware of how everyone and everything are perceived through an acceptance of our true presence?
"This above all: to thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man."
Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts
Friday, 26 June 2015
Friday, 13 March 2015
"what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?"
Coalition Britain: how has David Cameron affected the UK's reputation?
Few dispute that the UK has lost influence on the world stage – but what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?
When I read the heading - and particularly the sub headline - which titles this entry, I felt no call to read further - for anything predicated on such basis is inherently meaningless or insane.
- - -
"what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?"
This sort of poor excuse for 'thinking' is the nature of the 'problem.
Clarify the definitions - the foundational lens through which we cognize, and all else reveals itself.
Investing in "what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?", may operate in the guise of self protection or an expansion of the capacity to control or manipulate an outcome and thus everyone may willingly blind themselves to the whole - and their integral part within it - in favour of a self-assertive 'divide and rule' mentality that is essentially at war with Life because it is at war on one's self.
There IS a natural honesty of being that CAN be experienced THROUGH willingness and desire to have it. Although the act of exclusively focussing upon or 'seeing'. "what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?" will provide a script of self-justification - a justifiction - in which the OTHER or the EXTERNAL carries the major "blame", it simply operates as a deceit by which to choose against the true of one's being and SEEMING to 'get away with it'.
However the symptoms of DIS-EASE are packaged, toxic debt is the false currency operating as guilt - backed by the FEAR-standard. To base our identity in fearful and shameful - BLAMEFUL - self-definition is to GUARANTEE war, scarcity, deprivation, dysfunction, loss - oh the list goes on but you get the drift.
To drift into a negative or self-fragmenting disposition is a result of NOT living consciousness responsibility. However, we can never truly LOSE our being and it will pick us up the moment we open to listen and integrate with it. Responsibility is a NOW-ability of response, from re-cognition - from a fresh take - from a fresh take - from a fresh take.
Or one can defend a 'point of view' that honestly evaluated, has no true foundation in your joy. Choice is the nature of our human existence and disguising choice within deceitful manipulations is ONE of our CHOICES. One CANNOT change what one first does not OWN. The blame game guarantees non-ownership of false definitions through a sort of negative version of 'pass the parcel'. It works to keep us in the dark. It is a choice made IN the dark. But now you have read this you are within the responsibility of your conscious choice. You are not 'victim' to conditioning excepting you have yet to honestly acknowledge its operation through the use to which you put your mind. Live from a truly integrative disposition and KNOW your participance.
Monday, 10 November 2014
The self is a construct of the collective!
An evolution article:
Why Richard Dawkins is no scientist, the survival of the least selfish, and what ants can tell us about humans
The 'self' idea is a construct of definitions,and beliefs that generate feelings, thoughts and perceptions, from which proceed actions and behaviours and conditionings.
Clearly, and observably, foundational self-definitions are imagined and accepted or created in consciousness - but this is not equivalent to the 'definition' of a personal or private 'consciousness' which in our current human template operates AS IF it is a thinker that thinks alone and apart from all else.
In antiquity there were mythic models of a world on the back of a tortoise. In modernity the world seems so much more 'realistic' yet the framework within which which it is perceived and manipulated is no more substantial than an imagined tortoise.
There is no self but Self (for want of a word for the All in All). There is no self as is presumed and asserted and supported with emotional force and intentional identification. But there IS a belief/definition 'self' that has all the currency of its mutual acceptance but only the value of what it fulfils as consciousness experience.
The mechanism of the delivery of experience within consciousness can be explored AS experience, but to do so is to differentiate from the indivisible in order to experience a point of view. But there is NEVER a separation in FACT from the experience observed. It is provided to the desire because it is part of the desire. The desire that has dominated and driven scientific exploration in the main is an expression of a 'disconnected urge to define, control and prevail over Life Itself. And as such is clearly insane to anything but its own self-conditioned blindness.
The cutting off of consciousness from its true nature is a device of dissociation and denial well known to those who would use psychology for the manipulation of other minds rather than heal their own and others. But it operates a splitting off of dissociated 'conscious' personae within a negatively or fearfully determined and segregated self-sense.
The nature of a deception operates defensively against its own exposure by invalidating all else in such wise as to seem associated with the power of it god - from which it derives authority. The god of the separating self sense is the idea of asserting coercive power upon life - but beneath this 'power' is a self that defines itself in victim-hood and thus in hurt, fear and anger. The halt lead the blind. Nothing will come of a fearful foundation but fuel for fear.
The idea of self can be reintegrated to its true nature and consciousness. This is not determined and controlled but yielded to and accepted INSTEAD of yielding to the god of fear. AND in a true willingness for Life, our Arts and Sciences will uncover a wealth of INTEGRATED inspiration in all that it explores to experience in shared reality instead of seeking to manipulate as dictated by private agenda.
WE ARE all already cooperating to maintain a culture of lovelessness, because we are not actually separate from Consciousness and must TEACH what we define and accept ourselves to be. WHAT we teach depends on what we choose to learn. Definitions operate invisibly until you want to check in with what is really going on right here and now where 'reality' is presumed to be. Now are you opening to a truth that you do not make - because that which observes definitions is not defined by them. Just because one can follow thinking, doesn't mean one has to. Aligning with true joy and passion is not a fear-based compulsion. Fear OF consciousness is scientism's shadow. True Science seeks to know the truth - not just the filtered truths that can fuel a fearfully derived agenda.
One commenter offerred this to the article:
They don't demonstrate it on our timeframe - nor in ways that our human 'self' template can recognize. Species-ality focuses in its own explorations yet they reflect something to us that we take as 'collective' consciousness and that is something we tend to disregard in focussing in what we call individual consciousness. All facets operate consciousness - but we do not stand alone and apart to judge excepting we presume our independent ego to be god and believe our own spin.
Is not what we call 'conscious choice' but a virtual layer over what is actually happening anyway?Have you met any truly 'conscious' self that can choose to go against its needs or instinct - or is it a distorting layer of mind that redefines needs and the 'self' that it is, so as to then automatically 'choose' according to the defined template. In this sense our 'self' is a persona or mask upon what we actually ARE - that makes a model of the world in which to play out its illusory power. Putting such 'self' aside - that is - noticing it is not YOU, allows the undistorted integrity of a true existence to shine through. While the 'power' to be what you are not (against yourself) is your choice, all choice is but a mechanism of conditioned reaction.
But the first choice remains yours to change, regardless the layers of experience and definition that constitute the human conditioning.
Why Richard Dawkins is no scientist, the survival of the least selfish, and what ants can tell us about humans
The 'self' idea is a construct of definitions,and beliefs that generate feelings, thoughts and perceptions, from which proceed actions and behaviours and conditionings.
Clearly, and observably, foundational self-definitions are imagined and accepted or created in consciousness - but this is not equivalent to the 'definition' of a personal or private 'consciousness' which in our current human template operates AS IF it is a thinker that thinks alone and apart from all else.
In antiquity there were mythic models of a world on the back of a tortoise. In modernity the world seems so much more 'realistic' yet the framework within which which it is perceived and manipulated is no more substantial than an imagined tortoise.
There is no self but Self (for want of a word for the All in All). There is no self as is presumed and asserted and supported with emotional force and intentional identification. But there IS a belief/definition 'self' that has all the currency of its mutual acceptance but only the value of what it fulfils as consciousness experience.
The mechanism of the delivery of experience within consciousness can be explored AS experience, but to do so is to differentiate from the indivisible in order to experience a point of view. But there is NEVER a separation in FACT from the experience observed. It is provided to the desire because it is part of the desire. The desire that has dominated and driven scientific exploration in the main is an expression of a 'disconnected urge to define, control and prevail over Life Itself. And as such is clearly insane to anything but its own self-conditioned blindness.
The cutting off of consciousness from its true nature is a device of dissociation and denial well known to those who would use psychology for the manipulation of other minds rather than heal their own and others. But it operates a splitting off of dissociated 'conscious' personae within a negatively or fearfully determined and segregated self-sense.
The nature of a deception operates defensively against its own exposure by invalidating all else in such wise as to seem associated with the power of it god - from which it derives authority. The god of the separating self sense is the idea of asserting coercive power upon life - but beneath this 'power' is a self that defines itself in victim-hood and thus in hurt, fear and anger. The halt lead the blind. Nothing will come of a fearful foundation but fuel for fear.
The idea of self can be reintegrated to its true nature and consciousness. This is not determined and controlled but yielded to and accepted INSTEAD of yielding to the god of fear. AND in a true willingness for Life, our Arts and Sciences will uncover a wealth of INTEGRATED inspiration in all that it explores to experience in shared reality instead of seeking to manipulate as dictated by private agenda.
WE ARE all already cooperating to maintain a culture of lovelessness, because we are not actually separate from Consciousness and must TEACH what we define and accept ourselves to be. WHAT we teach depends on what we choose to learn. Definitions operate invisibly until you want to check in with what is really going on right here and now where 'reality' is presumed to be. Now are you opening to a truth that you do not make - because that which observes definitions is not defined by them. Just because one can follow thinking, doesn't mean one has to. Aligning with true joy and passion is not a fear-based compulsion. Fear OF consciousness is scientism's shadow. True Science seeks to know the truth - not just the filtered truths that can fuel a fearfully derived agenda.
One commenter offerred this to the article:
Use of the word "selfless" here undermines the argument. Selfless suggests a conscious choice (and therefore ability) to go against ones needs or instinct. In the case of the ants, they have no such ability, so it is not selfless.- - -
They don't demonstrate it on our timeframe - nor in ways that our human 'self' template can recognize. Species-ality focuses in its own explorations yet they reflect something to us that we take as 'collective' consciousness and that is something we tend to disregard in focussing in what we call individual consciousness. All facets operate consciousness - but we do not stand alone and apart to judge excepting we presume our independent ego to be god and believe our own spin.
Is not what we call 'conscious choice' but a virtual layer over what is actually happening anyway?Have you met any truly 'conscious' self that can choose to go against its needs or instinct - or is it a distorting layer of mind that redefines needs and the 'self' that it is, so as to then automatically 'choose' according to the defined template. In this sense our 'self' is a persona or mask upon what we actually ARE - that makes a model of the world in which to play out its illusory power. Putting such 'self' aside - that is - noticing it is not YOU, allows the undistorted integrity of a true existence to shine through. While the 'power' to be what you are not (against yourself) is your choice, all choice is but a mechanism of conditioned reaction.
But the first choice remains yours to change, regardless the layers of experience and definition that constitute the human conditioning.
Sunday, 28 September 2014
Perfection here and now
Here's a reply to one of my comments that prompted my further reply below:
Why not start with perfect moments and expand the idea? I am enjoying writing you now - and have no other agenda. Feels like nothing needs to be added or taken away - and thank you for your synchronicity.
The powers that be are exactly reflecting the beliefs and definitions OF power (and powerlessness) that are engraved but not indelibly so upon our hearts and minds.
I understand that racketeering evolves from the belief that if you don't get it someone else will, and whatever you get, someone will try to take it from - you just as you took it for yourself. A 'Mercantilism' that ITSELF becomes the host for a more disconnected parasite perhaps? The pursuit of power for its own sake without regard for anything else. It is a kind of inverted religion; a complete package, a path of self interest that seeks to become pure of any moral inhibition whilst using any form of any currency of beliefs to further its agenda. It is not without logic but its foundation is obvious by its fruits - though perhaps less so for those who follow their Faustian promise and actually believe they can win. Their victory is not glory of vengeance exacted, but death that initiates them to the opportunity to choose again. It is certainly possible to degrade one's consciousness further and yet further into terror and density but is that our choice - seen for what it is?
You've read the Protocols of Zion? Not the disinfo. It illustrates a comprehensive strategy of materialism given dedication and focus over generations. Regardless of whether this is correctly identified or merely setting up one particular tentacle of many as a proxy, it illustrates the personification of the negatively defined persona through time.
Like the Snowden NSA thing, it can seem that one uncovers forces that seem all powerful or almost… But that is also the mask of presentation by which one collapses and gives allegiance. (and collapsing into reaction is another form of allegiance because a true presence expresses its consciousness without collapsing and dissociating into displacement personae.
One has to be vigilant when opening to information that itself is not of a higher frequency. Fear can be contagious. If you do not open to that which inspires and so enjoy perfect moments in your day, you will become dispirited and recruitable for fear's agenda - whatever side of whatever issue.
You may be on track to undermine, limit or deconstruct the set up whereby a private sector cartel is effectively manipulating the US and indeed global financial system. But the way that is least able to be provoked into draconian reaction is of an honest willingness to communicate without oneself operating an agenda like unto their own. Maybe it's their job to be the Bogeyman in our times. I can't choose FOR them excepting to choose from an integrity that is also theirs if they are willing to yield to it. For integrity is not externally achieved in man's praise, but opened to in humility. We are all created equal - but I did not say born equal.
Most of us find our integrity severely undermined by terror, and then the devices we employ to cover over that sense of powerlessness also contain the seed of what they are serving to hide. There are some very driven people who are not aware of what really drives them, but only of their sense of necessity.
A strongly held focus can indeed accomplish more than can be at first imagined. Our motivation is always filtered by our definitions. If we come from a place of fear we will propagate fear even though our surface reality is full of the best intentions and the self-righteous certainty that fighting evil confers. As far as I see it - that is all within the scam and does not actually address its cause at all.
So I feel that if we focus on the Lifegiving - we can uncover the perspectives and resources needed.
But if one is drawn to become fascinated with evil - well do I have to spell it out for you?
Don't feed the troll!
We will never enjoy a perfect world here on Earth. Yet, the powers that be can not have their wars without central banking fiat money. It was no accident that WWI broke out in 1914 after the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. We take that away from them and free ourselves. It can be done if we focus on it.
Why not start with perfect moments and expand the idea? I am enjoying writing you now - and have no other agenda. Feels like nothing needs to be added or taken away - and thank you for your synchronicity.
The powers that be are exactly reflecting the beliefs and definitions OF power (and powerlessness) that are engraved but not indelibly so upon our hearts and minds.
I understand that racketeering evolves from the belief that if you don't get it someone else will, and whatever you get, someone will try to take it from - you just as you took it for yourself. A 'Mercantilism' that ITSELF becomes the host for a more disconnected parasite perhaps? The pursuit of power for its own sake without regard for anything else. It is a kind of inverted religion; a complete package, a path of self interest that seeks to become pure of any moral inhibition whilst using any form of any currency of beliefs to further its agenda. It is not without logic but its foundation is obvious by its fruits - though perhaps less so for those who follow their Faustian promise and actually believe they can win. Their victory is not glory of vengeance exacted, but death that initiates them to the opportunity to choose again. It is certainly possible to degrade one's consciousness further and yet further into terror and density but is that our choice - seen for what it is?
You've read the Protocols of Zion? Not the disinfo. It illustrates a comprehensive strategy of materialism given dedication and focus over generations. Regardless of whether this is correctly identified or merely setting up one particular tentacle of many as a proxy, it illustrates the personification of the negatively defined persona through time.
Like the Snowden NSA thing, it can seem that one uncovers forces that seem all powerful or almost… But that is also the mask of presentation by which one collapses and gives allegiance. (and collapsing into reaction is another form of allegiance because a true presence expresses its consciousness without collapsing and dissociating into displacement personae.
One has to be vigilant when opening to information that itself is not of a higher frequency. Fear can be contagious. If you do not open to that which inspires and so enjoy perfect moments in your day, you will become dispirited and recruitable for fear's agenda - whatever side of whatever issue.
You may be on track to undermine, limit or deconstruct the set up whereby a private sector cartel is effectively manipulating the US and indeed global financial system. But the way that is least able to be provoked into draconian reaction is of an honest willingness to communicate without oneself operating an agenda like unto their own. Maybe it's their job to be the Bogeyman in our times. I can't choose FOR them excepting to choose from an integrity that is also theirs if they are willing to yield to it. For integrity is not externally achieved in man's praise, but opened to in humility. We are all created equal - but I did not say born equal.
Most of us find our integrity severely undermined by terror, and then the devices we employ to cover over that sense of powerlessness also contain the seed of what they are serving to hide. There are some very driven people who are not aware of what really drives them, but only of their sense of necessity.
A strongly held focus can indeed accomplish more than can be at first imagined. Our motivation is always filtered by our definitions. If we come from a place of fear we will propagate fear even though our surface reality is full of the best intentions and the self-righteous certainty that fighting evil confers. As far as I see it - that is all within the scam and does not actually address its cause at all.
So I feel that if we focus on the Lifegiving - we can uncover the perspectives and resources needed.
But if one is drawn to become fascinated with evil - well do I have to spell it out for you?
Don't feed the troll!
Friday, 15 August 2014
Deception, power-seeking, corruption and hurtred
This article was linked in Google News. I found it refreshing to see a perspective that mainstream western media dare not or are are not allowed to publish.
My comment to the article:
If you doubt this could be so simply look at the anti-comments below it. They assert hatred, ridicule and deception. The power behind political puppets is never in the puppets - power makes everyone (who is tempted to use it) a hollow puppet to a false god.
The deceiving mentality embodies a coercive multi generational consolidation of such power through the 'smartest' arts of deception and bluster.
Seeking power in the world is a kind of 'Great Game' that usurps the native communication of our cooperative willingness. To its suckers, it promises victory - but its victory is simply utter ruin - for true power is not in a lie - no matter how much terror is wielded to force life to conform to the forms and condition called 'victory'.
The end that justifies any means is itself a deception and corruption. It is not power at all, but slavery. The power of truth is not a weapon or a shield so much as an Is. That which is NOT cannot be - however it asserts itself in form, and yet everyone complicit will see the Emperor clothed, because such power-gaming is part of the consciousness we have taken unto ourselves.
There is no victor in a battle of wills. Only a fearful addiction to a false sense of self.
There is a saying; 'if you cant beat them, join them'. But one can refuse to play the game at all. Give it not your identity and allegiance.
Releasing an addiction is first recognising and owning one's powerlessness. Only such a sense of loss and lack seeks power outside itself in a world of 'others' whom it uses. The essential trick is of distraction in such a way as to reframe one's perception along directed lines. Look within, always and in all ways. Don't give distractions the power to divert you from your true desire. Focus there and be guided therefrom. Release terror and hate from your armoury. You hate and hurt but your self unrecognised.
Fear cannot afford honesty. If fear is your god then let it be out in the open as a clear choice. The power that operates only in darkness hates and fears the light. For it has NO existence in the Light. But the truth of you Is in light and of light no matter the lies that have been believed and acted out. Look to the choices you are making and bring them to the heart. You are not powerless as an expression of true being. Coercion costs awareness of true being and can never deliver on its promises.
The script of the segregated forgetting, and the script of a reintegrative remembering are both available to choose between while darkness remains un-rooted from our mind. All things serve the purpose you hold true for you. Choose then awake to your true desire and not as baited reaction dictates.
Thursday, 24 July 2014
The Jesus Idea is both Messenger and Awakener
Daily Bell - Flee Rather Than Stand Your Ground
This article above seeks to suggest an alternate option from fight or flight (The heading is better put as disengage reaction rather than flee. Just walk away and put it behind you rather than feed that which only undermines your peace. Your peace is the clarity in which all else is appreciated as it is rather than struggling to make all things be as fear would have them be.
Here is my comment:
This article above seeks to suggest an alternate option from fight or flight (The heading is better put as disengage reaction rather than flee. Just walk away and put it behind you rather than feed that which only undermines your peace. Your peace is the clarity in which all else is appreciated as it is rather than struggling to make all things be as fear would have them be.
Here is my comment:
Give unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar (while it pertains and to the letter of its law). Give unto God what is due unto God.
Any messenger of a higher or more inclusive consciousness operates as a connection or awakener TO such a perspective.
This either triggers acceptance or resistance and denial. The latter interprets or redefines the message and the messenger in ways that reinforced and supported such separation-consciousness in more subtle disguises - but which no longer act as a conduit or messenger-awakener Consciousness. This was called attempting to put New Wine into old bottles - perhaps because leathern old bottles cracked when used for new wine?
In any case the forms of the message were subverted to become assertions of ego-centricity and hate or coercive manipulation such as to effectively neutralise or minimise the awakener's restoration to align within their full and true Consciousness.
This process applies to any inspirational spark of Consciousness that rises in the awareness of a persona identification. It can be readily observed in one's own mind - and any moment is an idea moment in which to notice how the mind seems to interject and cover over the Living Relational Reality with an interpretive structure that embodies certain ideas, wishes and definitions that are running largely - but not entirely - within the automatic or subconscious layer of a split attention.
Any shift of awakening - of direct noticing - reveals a framework of previously unconscious choice that can then be disregarded if no longer aligning with one's truly conscious desire. Releasing the coercive or fearful framework automatically allows the restoration of wholeness - to the degree that the recipient is willing to accept. Hence we have instant healings as well as a process of healing - depending on the willingness and readiness to accept. Likewise we have instant inspirations and progressive illuminations.
Awakening does not depend on belief - but an assertive or strongly held belief against it will select only those interpretations that reinforce its belief. However, once one has transcendent perspective and healed perceptions, the beliefs that now replace fearful and coercive ideas and self-definition likewise set a loop of reinforcement experience - MORE in line with the true nature of one's truth, joy or wholeness of purpose and appreciation. Again this can be a sudden turnaround or an inner shift that works through a process over time.
This reintegrating 'process' or realisation, is going on all the time everywhere - but is generally not self-aware until it has a vehicle of conscious willingness through which to know itself. A fragmenting or segregating purpose is also active - which operates as a separate and disconnected self-sense that actively denies or FORGETS.
Although the symbol of Jesus is one of transcendence, it is also one of embrace and expansion of what is present as one's experience - so as to be given a restored or healed perspective on whatever it is. Of course one will soon meet one's own persona's insistence that the 'answer' has to fit the framework of the problem as you have defined it, and this operates as an unwillingness to listen or a filtering out of what is not 'on your side' as you have framed yourself.
The parable of the wheat and the tares serves to indicate that until the harvest is gathered, both positive and negative (integrative and segregative) purposes are active. The readiness and willingness to accept truth as it is - that is without assertion of coercive demand that it fit YOUR frameworked or virtual identity, is a shift to a perspective that abides as the ordinary conscious ground of whatever is otherwise experienced.
The split mind is like backing all sides of every conflict - but shifting between them in various scenarios. When we recognize our own hidden 'elitism', we are free to relate in a different way rather than throw the first stone at that which we hate and hide in our self.
The 'church' in the original phrase was simply a real relationship at a level of self-awareness. No organisation or system is required to 'prop up' that which we simply ARE in our natural free condition. But such as there are calls or needs for systems or organisations, they can be set up within the perspective of vigilance for freedom from self-enamoured coercive or fearful thinking - as willingness allows.
Any messenger of a higher or more inclusive consciousness operates as a connection or awakener TO such a perspective.
This either triggers acceptance or resistance and denial. The latter interprets or redefines the message and the messenger in ways that reinforced and supported such separation-consciousness in more subtle disguises - but which no longer act as a conduit or messenger-awakener Consciousness. This was called attempting to put New Wine into old bottles - perhaps because leathern old bottles cracked when used for new wine?
In any case the forms of the message were subverted to become assertions of ego-centricity and hate or coercive manipulation such as to effectively neutralise or minimise the awakener's restoration to align within their full and true Consciousness.
This process applies to any inspirational spark of Consciousness that rises in the awareness of a persona identification. It can be readily observed in one's own mind - and any moment is an idea moment in which to notice how the mind seems to interject and cover over the Living Relational Reality with an interpretive structure that embodies certain ideas, wishes and definitions that are running largely - but not entirely - within the automatic or subconscious layer of a split attention.
Any shift of awakening - of direct noticing - reveals a framework of previously unconscious choice that can then be disregarded if no longer aligning with one's truly conscious desire. Releasing the coercive or fearful framework automatically allows the restoration of wholeness - to the degree that the recipient is willing to accept. Hence we have instant healings as well as a process of healing - depending on the willingness and readiness to accept. Likewise we have instant inspirations and progressive illuminations.
Awakening does not depend on belief - but an assertive or strongly held belief against it will select only those interpretations that reinforce its belief. However, once one has transcendent perspective and healed perceptions, the beliefs that now replace fearful and coercive ideas and self-definition likewise set a loop of reinforcement experience - MORE in line with the true nature of one's truth, joy or wholeness of purpose and appreciation. Again this can be a sudden turnaround or an inner shift that works through a process over time.
This reintegrating 'process' or realisation, is going on all the time everywhere - but is generally not self-aware until it has a vehicle of conscious willingness through which to know itself. A fragmenting or segregating purpose is also active - which operates as a separate and disconnected self-sense that actively denies or FORGETS.
Although the symbol of Jesus is one of transcendence, it is also one of embrace and expansion of what is present as one's experience - so as to be given a restored or healed perspective on whatever it is. Of course one will soon meet one's own persona's insistence that the 'answer' has to fit the framework of the problem as you have defined it, and this operates as an unwillingness to listen or a filtering out of what is not 'on your side' as you have framed yourself.
The parable of the wheat and the tares serves to indicate that until the harvest is gathered, both positive and negative (integrative and segregative) purposes are active. The readiness and willingness to accept truth as it is - that is without assertion of coercive demand that it fit YOUR frameworked or virtual identity, is a shift to a perspective that abides as the ordinary conscious ground of whatever is otherwise experienced.
The split mind is like backing all sides of every conflict - but shifting between them in various scenarios. When we recognize our own hidden 'elitism', we are free to relate in a different way rather than throw the first stone at that which we hate and hide in our self.
The 'church' in the original phrase was simply a real relationship at a level of self-awareness. No organisation or system is required to 'prop up' that which we simply ARE in our natural free condition. But such as there are calls or needs for systems or organisations, they can be set up within the perspective of vigilance for freedom from self-enamoured coercive or fearful thinking - as willingness allows.
One cannot coerce coercion out of existence, but one can reflect and illuminate choices that ARE being made that ARE resulting in painful and apparently unwanted outcomes. Once we see that we are in fact choosing a framework that sets us up to fail, we are free to choose differently.
The fantasy of the special one is an ignorance and an arrogance. When we recognize or notice such a framework of desire and intention in ourselves we then choose consciously whether to persist in self-illusion or let it go and come back into a current wholeness of being. That we are free to choose pain and redefine it as pleasure does not eradicate a fundamental dissonance alerting you to your being out of true. It is not your enemy or damnation, but your friend - once you embrace rather than hide your fear.
Paradoxically, the willingness to release the psychic or personal survival at a mental level, allows a perspective and flowing awareness that can 'feel' its way in a current embrace of all forces present. This is 'guidance' of the higher mind or simply operating as a wholeness of being with all that is present. The guidance of a fearfully driven mind is blinkered if not blinded by its past conditioning and will fail to walk through doors it sees as walls and seek doors where there are none. Its JOB is to keep you focussed in the physical aspect and your insistence that that is ALL there is to YOU, asks it to perform what it was not designed nor capable of doing - hence the shift from loyal servant to negative block of sickness or resistance of self conflicted futility.
Coming back into one's right mind begins with recognizing or accepting one's insanity - which is the dawning of a sane perspective in a mind of confusion. Those who wake to the 'asylum' serve their way to transcend such perspective - for as you give, so do you in truth receive. No one escapes their own judgement, but everyone is free to let it go and discover what the mind of 'divide and rule' cost them the appreciation of.
Everything is a matter of perspective. All proceeds lawfully from its foundation. There is always another way of looking at anything and everything. How do YOU choose to see this current event or situation? Freedom aligns with true signature joy. There is no coercion in 'God' and therefore none in you. Deception is a device in which that which is NOT, seems to be, and replaces or usurps what Is. All experience is real to the beholder but a lens of illusion only covers the light while it is employed.
Tuesday, 22 July 2014
Fear (of fear) is contagion
Fear is contagion… unless you choose wholeness.
Fear is distortion and prevents you accessing your higher mind and thus acting or communicating in such a way as to restore health and correct sickness.
Fear says you MUST protect yourself from… fear, so it gets to run the sickness AND Big Pharma. Fear is beneath all negative outcomes.
Becoming awake and responsible for our fear allows us to generate a positive outcome, even from negative experiences, as well as simply not being on the frequency that attracts negative synchronicities.
It does not matter WHO uses fear to appeal in coercive persuasions or apparently positive plans for salvation, it is all rooted in a self-deception.
We live in interesting times. Be curious as to how the way we see ourselves determines the perceptions and experiences we then get - and share on.
Some aspects of polarised futility become simply provocations to react - so as to fulfil someone else's agenda.
Being aware of what DOES and does NOT belong to you is crucial to who and what you accept and act out from as yourself.
Appeals to reasonableness in search of allies don't look deeply enough or honestly enough at what fearful and coercive beliefs can and do set in motion - in our name.
Fear is distortion and prevents you accessing your higher mind and thus acting or communicating in such a way as to restore health and correct sickness.
Fear says you MUST protect yourself from… fear, so it gets to run the sickness AND Big Pharma. Fear is beneath all negative outcomes.
Becoming awake and responsible for our fear allows us to generate a positive outcome, even from negative experiences, as well as simply not being on the frequency that attracts negative synchronicities.
It does not matter WHO uses fear to appeal in coercive persuasions or apparently positive plans for salvation, it is all rooted in a self-deception.
We live in interesting times. Be curious as to how the way we see ourselves determines the perceptions and experiences we then get - and share on.
Some aspects of polarised futility become simply provocations to react - so as to fulfil someone else's agenda.
Being aware of what DOES and does NOT belong to you is crucial to who and what you accept and act out from as yourself.
Appeals to reasonableness in search of allies don't look deeply enough or honestly enough at what fearful and coercive beliefs can and do set in motion - in our name.
Choose the world you want to live in by how you decide to see and use everything. It is all a matter of perspective. Insanity operates a complete loss of perspective to fearful and panic-driven salvage. But if the insane lead the insane - do not expect a natural health to heal or reintegrate your life and your relations and your world.
First, own the 'insanity' or disturbed mind - and then change your mind - by choosing FROM a place of authority within your natural being.
True authority does not coerce or seek to persuade in order to force an outcome. It KNOWS the way of being in which an optimal path grows within us and among us. But to access this authority, we have to let go off the false authority which asserts a false sense of self and seeks to prevail over the true.
Nothing new here - excepting that so much of the patterning of human conditioning is being EXPOSED in a Global Shift…. to eyes that would see and ears that would hear.
If you do not thirst for truth, you must pursue your choices until you are troubled and stirred beneath the self and world you thought was real.
Blessed are the poor in Spirit, for their True Inheritance is not truly lost so much as lost sight of. We are blessed by our very Existence - but have learned how to forget. All abilities that aligned to such an exploration of separated experience can be turned from the sword to the ploughshare. It is always a matter of choice.
(I wrote this into an article on naturalnews.com that felt to me an incitement to fear)
Saturday, 5 July 2014
Is sexual orientation a choice?
Is sexual orientation a choice?
Is life a choice or 'something predestined'?
At some level this is utterly irrelevant - because life IS - and anything one attempts to define or interpret WHAT it is - is a choice that brings its experience of point of view. Within that point of view any following 'choices' will extend and support that point of view - until one shifts perspective by releasing the self-definition for another.
Popular conversation is so weighted to the idea of an independent personal ego - as if THAT is the creative agent or 'doer' - but within a world of matter and flesh that effectively control it - that one cannot communicate about the Creative Template that embodies a deeper level of choice within which the personality extension operates.
BUt CHOICE in the sense of Creative Expression is the Movement of Being - whether this is operating unconsciously, in collective agreements or deliberately on purpose as an alignment with one's core vibrational signature.
So what does one GET out of believing this… or that? Every situation is unique and yet no one believes anything that doesn't give them a pay off at some level.
I decide that my life is Choice - not by asserting a coercive will, but by accepting and aligning with the current choice - so as to then be restored to the awareness of having choice. All else is conditioned reaction masquerading as choice - just as one can choose to forget or hide awareness of certain choices by rendering them unconscious and operating as if one is externally defined.
So why not embrace both - whilst recognising that however you define your relation to anything or anyone, your Existence is FACT that embraces all your choices. All identification confusion arises from covering over the felt quality of Existence Itself with mutual definitions . When this is uncovered, you know. You are not then compelled to seek outside yourself for validations or differentiations. Truly, choice is creative expression - but within a victim mentality becomes a defensive ingenuity of masking its lack of foundation.
Victim and victimising mentality operate as one choice within what could be called a power game. Who wants to play the game has no attention for what runs beneath the drama. Those within the game that try to impose rule upon others or indeed to undermine the rule of others are not changing the nature of consciousness, but only their perceptions and identification within the experience they are choosing.
One cannot HAVE an experience but that one chooses to define oneself in relation to what Consciousness or Existence Is. Most of such choice is unconscious to most human beings because they/we live what we call our conscious waking life within such a narrow surface focus.
When the definitions and meanings that had been accepted as 'Reality' become so shifting and complex as to break the rules of orthodoxy, there is a sort of 'anything goes' that allows an opportunistic and destructive appetite for power to play out. It also invites the re-evaluation of the nature of consciousness from beneath or beyond the 'power-game' of a conflicted and segregative consciousness.
In other words we are brought to a time of Choice as to whether to persist in the struggle of warring factions or reintegrate to a perspective that embraces all that we are.
Clearly choice as a concept can be used within a conflicted identity as a way of differentiating and asserting identity. But to truly embody a choice is to rest as one with it and not be offended or undermined by the persecutions of those who can not even see you.
A particular strand of political will seeks to introduce confusion as both a weakening and a distraction of its target. When one falls for a scam is it a choice - or is one truly a victim?
So many of the rules we make to keep us safe become a false sense of safety in which we are blindly herded in the direction of someone else's private agenda.
Perhaps it is truer and wiser to notice that one does not know who or what one is (in any conventional sense) - and so be free to uncover this in this very moment of existence - instead of running a template that has become corrupted by money lenders!
Is life a choice or 'something predestined'?
At some level this is utterly irrelevant - because life IS - and anything one attempts to define or interpret WHAT it is - is a choice that brings its experience of point of view. Within that point of view any following 'choices' will extend and support that point of view - until one shifts perspective by releasing the self-definition for another.
Popular conversation is so weighted to the idea of an independent personal ego - as if THAT is the creative agent or 'doer' - but within a world of matter and flesh that effectively control it - that one cannot communicate about the Creative Template that embodies a deeper level of choice within which the personality extension operates.
BUt CHOICE in the sense of Creative Expression is the Movement of Being - whether this is operating unconsciously, in collective agreements or deliberately on purpose as an alignment with one's core vibrational signature.
So what does one GET out of believing this… or that? Every situation is unique and yet no one believes anything that doesn't give them a pay off at some level.
I decide that my life is Choice - not by asserting a coercive will, but by accepting and aligning with the current choice - so as to then be restored to the awareness of having choice. All else is conditioned reaction masquerading as choice - just as one can choose to forget or hide awareness of certain choices by rendering them unconscious and operating as if one is externally defined.
So why not embrace both - whilst recognising that however you define your relation to anything or anyone, your Existence is FACT that embraces all your choices. All identification confusion arises from covering over the felt quality of Existence Itself with mutual definitions . When this is uncovered, you know. You are not then compelled to seek outside yourself for validations or differentiations. Truly, choice is creative expression - but within a victim mentality becomes a defensive ingenuity of masking its lack of foundation.
Victim and victimising mentality operate as one choice within what could be called a power game. Who wants to play the game has no attention for what runs beneath the drama. Those within the game that try to impose rule upon others or indeed to undermine the rule of others are not changing the nature of consciousness, but only their perceptions and identification within the experience they are choosing.
One cannot HAVE an experience but that one chooses to define oneself in relation to what Consciousness or Existence Is. Most of such choice is unconscious to most human beings because they/we live what we call our conscious waking life within such a narrow surface focus.
When the definitions and meanings that had been accepted as 'Reality' become so shifting and complex as to break the rules of orthodoxy, there is a sort of 'anything goes' that allows an opportunistic and destructive appetite for power to play out. It also invites the re-evaluation of the nature of consciousness from beneath or beyond the 'power-game' of a conflicted and segregative consciousness.
In other words we are brought to a time of Choice as to whether to persist in the struggle of warring factions or reintegrate to a perspective that embraces all that we are.
Clearly choice as a concept can be used within a conflicted identity as a way of differentiating and asserting identity. But to truly embody a choice is to rest as one with it and not be offended or undermined by the persecutions of those who can not even see you.
A particular strand of political will seeks to introduce confusion as both a weakening and a distraction of its target. When one falls for a scam is it a choice - or is one truly a victim?
So many of the rules we make to keep us safe become a false sense of safety in which we are blindly herded in the direction of someone else's private agenda.
Perhaps it is truer and wiser to notice that one does not know who or what one is (in any conventional sense) - and so be free to uncover this in this very moment of existence - instead of running a template that has become corrupted by money lenders!
PS
The theme or template for a human lifetime might be a 'predestined choice' at a higher level - but the way one participates and expresses this remains a personal experience of free will within that lifetime.
There are as many ways to live your life as can be imagined and acted upon with conviction. But if imagination is subordinated to an external set of past conditionings called material reality - then choices will be somewhat limited.
Sunday, 2 March 2014
The choice to hurt our self and the choice to hide it in victimhood and powerlessness
Telegraph Article:
Raunch culture isn’t harmless – it hurts us all
So one in every three strip club dancers in Britain is an undergraduate. Well, girls, you may be having a bit of a laugh, but you are promoting a tawdry, amoral climate
Commentary:
We hurt our self or not by our decision. If we unknowingly decide to hurt ourself then we learn to be more honest and vigilant on behalf of our own Good.
The INTENT to hurt self and others is a blind projection of hurt, hate and vengeance and takes innumerable forms - both passively and more overtly.
This operates deviously and deceptively as a way to keep the power of divide and rule whilst mitigating its apparent effects externally.
Everything that we experience is feedback that can be used to become more consciousness responsible, or it can simply run along its pattern and reinforce decisions and beliefs that define one's self negatively.
Your moral well being is your true peace. Codes of conduct serve as place holders and limits upon lawlessness, but nothing can substitute for You but will cost your peace.
The deceptions of a negative self definition work to undermine anything that would expose them, because they are accepted as your 'self' - and you love your self image because you made it, but it does not love or know you - for it is a kind of idol or 'avatar' for your identification.
When we identify with the forms, and with the meanings we give the forms, to the exclusion of the Meaning that our true presence always illuminates, we abandon the Living to dally among the 'dead'. Within the darkness of fear, and confusions as to what and who we are, we choose what holds the most pleasure or the least pain - according to the situation as we each define it.
Reclaiming your power is not adding to yourself yet more conflict, but opening your mind to your consciousness in the midst of whatever is going on. When we choose to manipulate and coerce our own consciousness we become active and available to a world of coercive ill-intent.
Guilt and fear are the signs of an invalidating will. Joy and inclusion are signs of an extension of what life is being - right where you are.
I write to open beneath the 'same old' war-polarities that effectively block communication. It is not just what you do - but the way that you do it. If you cannot do it as an expression of truly valuing yourself, Life and others - do not hurt yourself. If you seem stuck in a bad habit, become curious instead of guilty and powerless, in the desire to uncover the core beliefs and self definitions that simply are NOT true of you or belonging to you.
Trying to get out of a trap only tightens the net.
The deceptions that offer 'freedom' or to extend or add to your 'power' are tricky seductions to keep deeper fears covered up.
This is where the true wealth is hidden - beneath such fears. For you are priceless, and would remember this if you let them fall away and stood naked within your true being.
tomjones2012b commented to the article:
The only people who make raunch culture sleazy, are people like Judith Woods, who slut-shames a culture she doesn't like. Raunch culture beats working for a supermarket that sells alcohol and tobacco, vices that kill hundreds of thousands (I hope Woods does neither), or sells junk food that harms more people that raunch culture ever will
my reply to tomjones2012b:
Lovelessness is pervasive to the mind that values it as a special kind of self-love. Most of us have some investment and identification in lovelessness that finds us throwing the stone of hurt and hate at another - as if we stood cleaner thereby.
Lovelessness seeks and finds the evidence for its justification in the errors of others - and gives it priority over the capacity to open and embrace communication.
There are innumerable examples of sins or loveless, coercive acts that seek for self while denying Life and others. As long as we focus outside on all the symptoms, we succeed in NOT looking within at the cause.
The context makes all the difference at an individual level. And what we see is the measure of our own self-acceptance. Any rejection of our self brings the play of its reintegration in the circumstances of our life, yet while we persist in rejection, we do not recognize our Life - and seek control from a disconnected sense of distrust and chaos.
It is part of life that we can play out persona and use that to access experience, but we can get lost in such play when dreams turn to nightmare. The world (human conditioning) is expertly designed for forgetting who you are in the play of persona. Until we stop playing such games.
Friday, 21 February 2014
Divide and rule operates within our minds, as our choice
'Divide and rule' operates in our minds, under our noses such that we choose to limit ourselves, become hostage or victim to circumstance and then express powerlessness in destructive ways. This point was brought out when
My comment:
I see this, at present, as the biggest problem with humanity - We like to simplify our enemies into groups that include wide swaths of people that have nothing whatever to do with our grievances.
My comment:
Tuesday, 12 November 2013
Consciousness is what is changing - hence EVERYTHING is changing
An article: Typhoon Haiyan: there is worse to come - led into the idea of Climate change.
Now I cannot say I know whether Climate change is significantly influenced by human behaviour. Nor do I know if the weather is influenced by mass consciousness - for the relationship between Consciousness and Experience has not really been allowed into anything except quantum physics yet, though Seth and many others point to a deeper Cosmology than materialism. Nor can I say I know much about HAARP (look it up) and its effects on weather - whether intended or unintended. It's all secret. Secrets and lies.
What I do know is that human consciousness has a manipulative aspect upon itself such as to seek to attempt to control any aspect of Life it can get a handle on - including perceptions or minds of others - and is riddled with deep guilt for exactly that reason - as the religious archetype shows, and which resurfaces in a climate change guilt-driven agenda.
How to know where to get information from when science is so heavily distorted by its marriage with corporatocracy - the new church and state. The dog that fetches the wrong stick is made into dogmeat! Survival of the fitting in?
I feel to discern the coercive intent - or lack thereof - as a guide to the underlying intent. Truths can be used to deceive after all, and fictions can be used to reveal the truth. Truth is in the heart and mind as one and is uncoercive upon you.
Science without a heart is like a mechanical heartless mind. It can execute 'logical' programs without any actual connection to anyone or anything - including those who at the top of the pyramid, who are abused and hollowed out by such mentality amidst seductions of power. Is it not so, after the 'rush' wears off?
In my heart, I feel that Consciousness is what is changing - hence EVERYTHING is changing. We each choose to unify our consciousness or to be fitted to a machine. But we cannot BE a machine because choice is our most fundamental nature as consciousness of existence.
Now I cannot say I know whether Climate change is significantly influenced by human behaviour. Nor do I know if the weather is influenced by mass consciousness - for the relationship between Consciousness and Experience has not really been allowed into anything except quantum physics yet, though Seth and many others point to a deeper Cosmology than materialism. Nor can I say I know much about HAARP (look it up) and its effects on weather - whether intended or unintended. It's all secret. Secrets and lies.
What I do know is that human consciousness has a manipulative aspect upon itself such as to seek to attempt to control any aspect of Life it can get a handle on - including perceptions or minds of others - and is riddled with deep guilt for exactly that reason - as the religious archetype shows, and which resurfaces in a climate change guilt-driven agenda.
How to know where to get information from when science is so heavily distorted by its marriage with corporatocracy - the new church and state. The dog that fetches the wrong stick is made into dogmeat! Survival of the fitting in?
I feel to discern the coercive intent - or lack thereof - as a guide to the underlying intent. Truths can be used to deceive after all, and fictions can be used to reveal the truth. Truth is in the heart and mind as one and is uncoercive upon you.
Science without a heart is like a mechanical heartless mind. It can execute 'logical' programs without any actual connection to anyone or anything - including those who at the top of the pyramid, who are abused and hollowed out by such mentality amidst seductions of power. Is it not so, after the 'rush' wears off?
In my heart, I feel that Consciousness is what is changing - hence EVERYTHING is changing. We each choose to unify our consciousness or to be fitted to a machine. But we cannot BE a machine because choice is our most fundamental nature as consciousness of existence.
Sunday, 14 July 2013
Conscious Universe Part 2 Universal Will is free
Counter point," You can will your body, but can you will your will?"
- - -
You can believe you will your body but the impulse to do so can be measured before you are conscious of so doing.
Is the 'self' that we accept as identity a virtual 'entity' for something
that cannot actually be in any true sense objectified or defined?
Yet 'awareness of something' is FACT - but one cannot really
separate the awareness from the something. All of what is arising to
awareness is an arising including what you call take as yourself.
The wish for such self is evident in its every moment and is indeed a wish
to will the will rather than extend a willingness for and agency of
will.
The 'movement of being' is not measurable or comparable
because there is nothing outside it, but it is discernible within itself
because awareness has a Feeling aspect. This is not interpreted because
it a direct knowing or recognizing of Itself in its qualities of being.
The mind as we currently experience it is a forgetting/limiting device that
facilitates specific focus of attention in an interpretive experience or
self/world.
It is at root an expression of or within will, yet one which seems to generate a contra or limiting distortion within Unified Mind.
The 'divide and rule' mentality is the interpretation of an assertive or coercive intent, which identifies a thought of self as self and seeks to protect, persist and prevail as a fragment over the whole. It essentially maintains its existence through the forgetting or denial of Unified awareness - enacted by the action-reaction of the belief in self-will as power to have changed the nature of Being, itself. It believes it is on its own against an unknown Universe which it seeks to map, tame, control, exploit for its own private agenda.
Yet this structure of conditioned identity and reaction serves as an agency for the Self Awareness of Creative Infinity to awaken through its experience to its Creative Root.
The tangibility and visibility of being may be perceived as an end in itself or as a vehicle through which Life Knows Itself Perfectly.
This is the 'choice' between gratification of desire within the conditioned sense or transcendence of desire in true Intimacy. This choice is a working illusion, but while it is active, we cannot neglect to choose, for the default is a choosing of unconscious conditioned reaction.
- - -
You can believe you will your body but the impulse to do so can be measured before you are conscious of so doing.
Is the 'self' that we accept as identity a virtual 'entity' for something
that cannot actually be in any true sense objectified or defined?
Yet 'awareness of something' is FACT - but one cannot really
separate the awareness from the something. All of what is arising to
awareness is an arising including what you call take as yourself.
The wish for such self is evident in its every moment and is indeed a wish
to will the will rather than extend a willingness for and agency of
will.
The 'movement of being' is not measurable or comparable
because there is nothing outside it, but it is discernible within itself
because awareness has a Feeling aspect. This is not interpreted because
it a direct knowing or recognizing of Itself in its qualities of being.
The mind as we currently experience it is a forgetting/limiting device that
facilitates specific focus of attention in an interpretive experience or
self/world.
It is at root an expression of or within will, yet one which seems to generate a contra or limiting distortion within Unified Mind.
The 'divide and rule' mentality is the interpretation of an assertive or coercive intent, which identifies a thought of self as self and seeks to protect, persist and prevail as a fragment over the whole. It essentially maintains its existence through the forgetting or denial of Unified awareness - enacted by the action-reaction of the belief in self-will as power to have changed the nature of Being, itself. It believes it is on its own against an unknown Universe which it seeks to map, tame, control, exploit for its own private agenda.
Yet this structure of conditioned identity and reaction serves as an agency for the Self Awareness of Creative Infinity to awaken through its experience to its Creative Root.
The tangibility and visibility of being may be perceived as an end in itself or as a vehicle through which Life Knows Itself Perfectly.
This is the 'choice' between gratification of desire within the conditioned sense or transcendence of desire in true Intimacy. This choice is a working illusion, but while it is active, we cannot neglect to choose, for the default is a choosing of unconscious conditioned reaction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)