Global and personal directed narrative

I wrote this into Jon Rappoport's ongoing exposure of fraud relating to the manufactured zika virus hysteria.



- - -

What is noticeable in directed narrative inceptions, once one pauses to discern beneath the impressionism, is the delivery of emotionally triggering payload via false associations in a form of plausible deniability.

The apparent issue - ie: "outbreak of microcephaly due to zika virus" can be simply refuted by revealing published data that refutes the assertion. But evidently no one in the mainstream media engages in such a relational conversation, they merely persist in asserting it with more asserted association - whether climate change and zika, Catholic contraception and zika associations. So all sorts of 'connecting and supporting narratives are built on the first lie - and with such widespread exposure and persistence as to subliminally incept it as the dominant narrative - without any real relationship or communication taking place - apart from people extending a receptivity of passive compliance of unquestioned belief.

Underneath the behaviour is motive. What is or are the intended outcomes of such a globally pushed narrative device? There are many that can be proposed but the global nature of compliance in propagating and supporting it - and of not challenging its veracity or addressing the hysteria soberly, all call it out as a symptom of globalist capture or subversion of both our minds and our institutions - but particularly the Media - which could give voice to a greater perspective but does not.

The globalist movement - for want of better words, is a carefully laid trap over many generations.
The intent and effect is far more more insidious than merely being governed by a different set of 'leaders' or 'lords', for the ruling of the mind - and the conforming it to a basis of loveless disregard for Humanity that effects hatred of all that loves truth and is truly loving - so as to remake Life on Earth in its own image. The external personification and embodiment of this seems overwhelming and its power seems to be a powerlessness of Life itself - at least - as we have defined our life to be.

But the inner reality I see, is of a denied and raging hatred - that is firstly, self-hatred, rage, terror, grief, impotence, and the mess of all that is denied acceptance to our conscious awareness and pushed down, out in, the act of splitting a part of our thought and focus, as if to escape our sense of fundamental self-conflict. This splitting off can ONLY seem to maintain itself within a directed coercive narrative, because truth is FEARED and love seems weak and undermining to the directive for survival at all costs. And the fragmented consciousness (which continues to fragment from denied self as its way of saving itself), assumes any forms of shifting alliance to mask in and reinforce mask upon. The complexity and speed and nature of the defence against truth is of a divine intelligence serving a fear and rage agenda. If I try to describe this I merely embody confusion.

However as I notice a falsity or dissonance-avoidance dressed in false narrative, and choose not to accept and propagate a dis-integrity of being, but open instead in a willing desire for truth that has to then look at and feel the denied self - be that whatever sense of pain, disgust or negatively conditioning sense of being denied - there is a shift of perspective. The symptoms no longer define a state of disconnect from Life. This is of immediate practical significance. This is opening to a re-integrative or healing movement of tangibly felt Life - not a good cop in hidden relation to a bad cop - or some symbol of Life that is used as a shield or weapon in righteous  and blind hate.

The capacity to feel all of what we are feeling is part of reclaiming all that we are. Not in order to spiritualize or evolve our capacity of control through denial, conflict and withholding - but simply to recognize and share in the presence of Life - as it moves us and we uncover ourselves to be.

We can choose to be a witness for truth and to see the witnesses to truth - (or indeed to love, because a love of truth cannot love to fixate on the hated - but must enquire more deeply as to "what is really going on here' where something so hateful to me is presenting itself" - and 'what is my right relation or true response here?'). Acting from a connected presence is not reacting the same old conditioning in the same old re-enactment. We escape the past by bringing it truly into the present as discerning presence, rather than by letting it impose a false or fear-driven narrative on the present so as to deny and sacrifice Our presence for the 'survival' of a sense of power or control over the future. This is a mind-trap and yet one will not see it while one is firmly identified in its seeming protection. "Better the devil you know!"....? As long as one has any remaining conscious awareness of what is here to choose between, one has the capacity to choose to see that choice more honestly - whenever a dissonant outcome reveals a misalignment of definition.





note: Why use CAP Z for zika? Is it a symptom of a subconsciously conditioned Importance?

Assassination by drone

Cameron’s drone strike in Syria raises questions

I do not give credibility to anything reported at face value, especially when effectively pasted into the main stream media. In modern times more sophisticated ways of engineering perceptions and indeed consent are available and used without due transparency or accountability. A purpose of self-protection operates openly. But what is protected to persist may not be true of us and may actually hasten loss or death. Fear stifles growth and war inflames negative 'growths'.

We are assured that our established institutional power structures are acting in our best interest and not serving their own private agenda as a power cartels - for by the regulatory protections that deny transparency and accountability, they become cartels imposing upon their will upon their citizens rather than in a genuine relationship of service.

Criminal acts are not acceptable and the rule of law is called upon. No matter who is involved.

Is the seeding and propagation of terrorism used as a proxy for other agendas? - for the so called "War On" anything has always effected the promotion and seeding of that thing - wither haplessly or by design. So who benefits? - what agendas are enacted within its cover? Follow the money? Note the consolidations of power? What are the weaknesses by which we are exploited to support what we would not otherwise choose or tolerate in ourself?

Are you told what to think? Is fear the basis of our thinking, or are we indeed created in and of a true presence of communication extending?

The 'deceiver' is fear-thinking. It plays all sides of any conflict and uses our fears as a point of gaining leverage and support. Personally I recommend not to use it, for no matter what it promises it always deals the same hand.

It appears that Mr Cameron is openly dealing the death penalty to British citizens in a foreign country without any prior procedure of trial or accountability whilst appealing to secret intelligence under notional security to justify himself after the act. That the individuals may have in fact been who the intelligence says they were and intending what is said they were is not the point - though anyone emotionally captive to the narrative will insist it is THE point. But that is the power of controlling the narrative! The war being unleashed is not contained or containable excepting by pausing from reaction within the narrative of hate and fear and the distortions and deceptions that are natural to hate and fear.

Everything we do, teaches others but also sets the measure of our own learning. We come to believe our own spin! We ARE each and all making choices that determine our world - and the world that then unfolds of such choices - for to choose to love to hate invites hatred to usurp our sovereignty of will in a false sense of power and an over extending reach that hollows out and lays waste. And we are undone not by 'enemy' but by our own vanity and folly. Who thinks they can control war? The globalist "elite" and their new world order? They embody the idea of war - not in their core humanity - but in the idea of exclusive right or power to prevail over and deny all else. And of course such action brings equal and opposite reaction - which they think they are using but they are out of relation and cannot see the humanity of others because they do not accept their own. I do believe a global governance will come - but one that serves the balance points for a maximal diversity of living, not a top-down dictate upon slaves. We've been there so many times.

Our humanity is the key to our divinity - but to become in the image of our hate is to forsake our true inheritance and believe ourself denied and to seek scapegoats to dump on and to kill.  It isn't really fundamentalism, extremism or radicalism - but an exclusive self righteousness within whatever forms mask the hate and thus give it justification - or sanctify it in the 'religion' of victim sacrifice to a jealous and vengeful god - for such is the god of fear  - regardless to forms it takes.

Waking up is a capacity to discern the communication within the form - rather than captive to form-based narrative. Why feed a man with fear when you can teach him how to recognize phishing attacks?

False framing, manipulating perception, directing history

I notice a mainstream article in the Guardian crafted to deliver a hidden agenda in the guise of moderation.

"Now is not the time for Britain’s Jews to talk of leaving

That Jews face a heightened threat from Islamists is undeniable but society is not against us"

It says  to its target audience; who are distinctly separated from their homeland by defining as 'Briain's Jews' that "now IS the time to talk of leaving - ostensibly for Isreal - but really - just to be afraid and unsettled and thus drawn into deeper support for WAR on Islam - and back this up with the reminder the Society Itself may turn against .... an "us" that the writer presumably speaks for - and writes to incept in the readers mind.
To the Jewish reader, a sense of unity in persecution and victimhood, and to non-Jewish readers of a mainstream British news publication, an exclusion that re states Jews are different or separate from not only Islamists (who have been redefined thus as a hate identity), but from Society - whatever country you have otherwise embraced and accepted and participated in and contribute to as a human being.

The response I commented into FT.com is below:


Fear conditions reaction. If given power to do so. Fear-based conditioning operates emotionally triggered pathways of reaction that can then be exploited. Setting up a fearfully defined scenario as if it were true invites others to enter or participate in the definition and thus reinforce its claim to being true.

Consciousness works in strange ways. We co create perceptions, reactions and experience without 'knowing what we do' - although we all 'think' we know what we are doing - and that is where fear-defined thinking usurps Reason.

Jewish Britons, or Britons of Jewish descent, are a richly diverse range of individuals many of whom might assimilate more completely to their homeland - to the land they make their home in - if they were not conditioned to fear being invalidated, rejected, denied and persecuted just for 'Jewishness' - by the narrative of extermination by Nazism being kept ever fresh.

Very clever people - of any background, can learn how to manipulate perceptions. Though the wise, resist the illusion of power this confers. The problem is never 'Jewish', nor Islamic. The problem is framed in consciousness and reacted from as if true - asserted true and defended or fought for as true.

All of the mounting problems reflecting back at us in our times call out for re-evaluation within consciousness - and I would put a C to make it Consciousness - because human consciousness is a fear-conditioned device that runs believing itself free - believing its own thinking.

Thinking can contrive financial instruments that no one can understand - as part of an obfuscation. Whilst there may well be some whose identity expresses the right to deceive as a legitimate means to an end, more single mindedly than others, the 'deceiver' is never really "out there" but in our own unguarded capacity to drift from or adulterate, what we feel and know to be true of us.

The Past is a poor script to choose from when apart from its imposition, all creative opportunity and endeavour is open to explore and share in.

When I meet the presence of another - everything else is secondary. The refusal of presence is itself a conditioned fear - and not a proof of unworthiness for love.

Education always meets a willingness to learn. Self-righteousness is 'loving to hate' and always masks a 'hating to love'. There are many things in the world that are terrible to contemplate, but I do not feel to use them or be used by them as a foundation from which to make identity from.

Poverty of Spirit and obscene inequality

The subject of wealth distribution and the politics of our way of organising our affairs:
This article on an editorial, "Why Are We So Obsessed With Everyone Else's Wealth?"

My comment:

Lets all blame it on the symptoms!
"God is dead - there are ONLY symptoms!"
"Symptoms lock us into a war that we cannot opt out of!"
"You are the problem - I hate you. No, you are the problem - I hate you and your hate proves I am right".

Many at the Daily Bell know that a significant aspect of problem is actually the assertion of 'answers' that really perpetuate the problem in disguise and are not answers at all - but are traded AS IF they were. They 'redistribute problem'.

A true accounting must remove falsely framed agendas and assertions so as to simply know.
Thinking about and opinion-asserting is grabbing at straws.
The idea that truth is ours to determine gives rise to a personal or private mind, and agenda
If such 'power' then consolidates so as to Lord it over a world it effectively dictates - why would we be surprised?
But without its game of power such 'lord' is nothing. Nothing at all.
What is it that pays tribute unto this dark 'lord'
but fear's displacement.

Thank the reflection for revealing a truth that it neither frames nor imagines.
Even if that such is to recognize what has no belonging in a unified purpose and so none in me.
We invest and trade and identify in a currency of ideas. This but reflects 'downstream' as the world such identity establishes.
Until the whole thing is brought to account, there can only be the desperation of positions within a fear of loss.
Upstream is the consciousness at template level that operates in secret and guile only because of what it is being used FOR.
Upstream of that is the Creative - which the ingenious denies in seeking self-specialness without consequence.
No one in their right mind seeks self-specialness.
Wrong-mindedness may become the norm here, but it will never become love. Hence it MUST deny love to seem bearable.

Power-envy operates the manufacture of grievance.
Who has ears, let them hear!

- - -

On the same page was a comment by GF:

Wealth Redistribution is almost as pernicious and destructive as Monopoly Central Banking. Both should be eliminated from the human lexicon, and relegated to the dustbin of history, where they belong. Yeah, I know, fat chance. : )

I reply:

Isn't the attempt to eliminate the way we KEEP things rather than release them? History does shoe remarkable persistence in repeating itself - albeit in ever more complex forms. But I like the idea of redefining everything clearly so that coercion is coercion is coercion no matter which 'side' of the fence it appears to be on - or how much justifiction it generates from its polar opposite.
History can mean what is not here now unless we choose to repeat it by reacting as if it is here. It can also mean the coercive narrative of a justification for wielding power at expense of living presence.
The coercive mentality makes its own version of 'directed history'.
By the way if the 'banking system' COULD be made a transparent and fully accountable service - such that no sleeves existed to hide false cards, no table to hide signal under and no loopholes that could be exploited to corrupt its service - what kind of system would it be?
And if wealth distribution was a movement of free will rather than of pernicious withholding via artificially imposed scarcities and reflected patterns of value shared.
The deceiver works both ends of the market, or the conflict, by interjecting a false framework onto a communication breakdown. I feel a world of difference between siding with freedom rather than 'fighting for it' for all wars are in a sense 'the banker's wars' although the corruption in the template is not IN the symbol that reflects it - nor the scapegoat offered up to relieve it from exposure.
But healing our mind DOES mean being more and more aware and responsible for our currency and usage of thought and word and therefore of the deeds that effect automatically from the only level that can be truly changed - for coercing behaviours is not freedom no matter what is 'eliminated' thereby. Reclaiming power must begin with recognizing and owning our part in a deception regardless 'who seemed to start it'. Merely operating a grievance aims victimhood at whoever and whatever the conditioning dictates as 'enemy'. I'm not suggesting there are not strong feelings associated with our sense of grievance, but they do not mean that the self-definition that gives rise to them is the whole truth.
History is also a perception and all perception is selective. One can perceive from a sense of lack and grievance or from a sense of wholeness. Many find great self-forgiveness approaching death and become illuminated by a tangible peace. I am not suggesting we put off today until tomorrow - but that we are not LOCKED into perspectives but by our own pride - along with a lifetime's conditioning to operate 'command and control' or else feel failure and powerlessness.
The microcosm is the portal to the Macrocosm. But one can indulge a sense of powerlessness so as to no longer feel obliged to live the capacity that one does have to embody and communicate a better way of living than fearful greed and shameful envy.
When everyone chooses NOT to choose their own integrity, the 'market' is wide open to corruption. Waiting to see if others will change first or justifying the status quo because 'what difference would it make if I changed' IS the investment in the status  quo - at the level of measuring everything primarily in terms of the sense of personal loss or gain that y/our history sets as the available options.
Though I include you in reply here I am of course addressing a wider attention and not focussing on you personally. That thinking makes it so is forgot in the wish that our thoughts be true. A disconnected thinking costs the mind an extraordinary overhead in defence and of course leads via bedlam to a prodigal wasteland.

Drug rackets and consciousness

For some time I have been seeing the signs of changes in drug laws that feel top-down rather than a response to bottom up pressure.
This was one today in a media promoted debate of sorts


Is there a larger directed change going on here?
"War on drugs", like "war on terror" is all about giving power to the mask in order to deny the realities that are then supposed to be exterminated, invalidated, denied, concealed.
fear calls on fear to protect itself from fear.

Coming out from the mask is the only way to own the choices that give rise to the outcomes we SAY we don't want or have conflicts or fears about what our choices bring forth. One cannot communicate within the mask or indeed to it.

Life is not fixed down as any prevailing power asserts it to be - including the power of our own core beliefs and self definitions as to who we are in relation to any situation in our world.

Giving power to the mask is to be tyrannized by that which was initially invoked to protect. Coercive interventions in our materially-energetic world, our social interaction and cultural development, our biology and our self-definitional template - all tend to operate a segregative disconnecting agenda that reinforces its originating premise of a fearful or negatively interpreted condition.

The fear which divides and conflicts and suppresses Life then sets up the market for controlling the demand that then automatically arises for distractions of escape, for mitigations of pain, for the power to validate and support the out of true.

There is a VAST amount of money in drugs legal and illegal. Vast flows of money-energy transfer are associated with corruption at every level. Even moral arguments are attractive when the alternatives cost more than the risks of NOT shifting control modalities.

Dark money - unlike dark energy or dark matter - is not just a Black hole in the model that doesn't exist in the terms the model sets - but is similar in that it's not supposed to be going on but actually runs so much of what also goes on behind the scenes.

There is a larger debate than is ever allowed to be framed by the media and that is to open up a real conversation about consciousness, existence itself. True foundations are not a 'spiritual nicety' for those on Maslow's pyramid - but is core foundational pragmatism of means and ends.
To corrupt one's integrity in order to get some temporary hit, in complete disregard for consequence - will still meet consequence. Freedom is not freedom from consequence or learning would be impossible and no meaningful direction available.

Re-integrating cooperatively and separating (in order to then control) pull in mutually exclusive directions and cancel each other out. A house divided cannot stand.
Choosing to believe that people are incapable of managing their own affairs and must be conditioned, managed and herded for their own protection is a self-fulfilling choice. As is the extension of faith and worth that chooses to operate from the belief that we can live out from a true sense of worth and share and grow it by being true to ourselves. Finding what we need as and when when we need it rather than imagining what worry feeds us to be true and losing what we have NOW to appreciate and grow.

This is not power, but fear in disguise

'Terrorist' is too big a word for the deranged killers of Isis - says FT.com 

(When one uses communication as a weapon, one gives up the power to actually enter into communication).

 Looking at history one is wise to reflect that until facts are established - if ever they are established as facts, the manipulation of minds - as the setting up of perceived realities and hence of 'justified' reactions, is as much part of the mentality and armoury of war as is any other device. False flag events can be faked, acted out by persons disguised as 'enemies' or set in motion by secretly supporting, infiltrating and directing groups that will provide the required outrage or threat.

The unequal distribution of power in the world at large allows a more and more directed 'history'. as well as being able to run all sides of a conflict and benefit from the breaking up and bringing low of others.

Although there may well be such alliances as conspire to remap the world in a 'new world order' of their own imprint, the essential patterning is of a negatively defined sense of self. 

For Millennia we have learned to operate in segregative and separative ways that disconnect us from our awareness of being Life - of being one with Life. This seemingly disconnected self is essentially operating as a pattern of deception at the template foundation of our consciousness or personality construct - but of course it runs as a promise of power, protection and self-specialness.

The world we see unfold in woe is inevitable within the perceptions and interpretations of a negatively defined self sense. Beneath any possible argument that can be offered in witness to awaken from such addictive a negative loop of  perpetrating victimhood, is simply that we choose the world we see by what we choose to give focus and therefore desire and value to.

When the media shout, one does not have to follow or accept or believe anything that is said, but can pause, reconnect with the peace of a positively defined or Life-integrated self-sense and discern the true nature of what is currently offered you in terms of what is resonant with and relevant to your true desire - to your joy in being.

Conflicted identity, conflicted minds, purposes and emotional states, all lend themselves to providing botnet support for every and any kind of 'power mongering'. The nature of the deceiver is that one cannot 'win' in struggle against it, one thus only feeds it validity. I stand with Jesus's teaching as is discernible in such respect. Few had ears to hear and few yet have. When power is held more dear than truth, the lie takes over your mind. Therefore fear and hatred is the darkness in which we are induced to invest in as if to protect and overcome… fear and hatred.

The only way that does not re-seed the same mentality of victimhood worshipped openly and power worshipped secretly, is to face and challenge our fears. To bring them into the light. Who hides from fear, hides IN fear. Such a one is not acting from love or any moral quality of the Life in All - but seeks a private agenda for itself alone - and must needs set others in conflict to maintain its own separated self sense; over and against all others.

It is not power that has run amok in the world, but fear in disguise.

Baiting reaction in the guise of covering a popular celebrity death

This page features various comments including my own to an article I felt to be inciting of hatred and provoking reaction:

Robin Williams: Westboro Baptist Church could picket actor's funeral after saying he was 'hated by God' and is 'in hell'

My first comment:

What is the agenda for any media giving coverage to absurd hatemongers?
It isn't that these people speak to an issue while honouring the right of another to choose differently than them - it is that they preach hate - albeit in a way most will find absurd - excepting anyone (such as the Independent) takes it seriously.
Alas that responsibility is not valued as a cultural foundation. If everyone leans even a little from their integrity, one soon sees a world just like ours.

Celebrities are often valued for the role they play in our consciousness - for we do not know the man. In death as in life they are used for infotainment - yet that says more about those who share in such than the individual concerned.

I feel inclined to say 'God' knows you as you are and never for a moment is fooled by what you think you have become - far less what others think about you. And to those who need a hateful god I say everyone - but everyone goes to Heaven. (Implicit in what I said about 'God').

Those who love to hate are those who fear to love. No wonder! 
Independent, please desist from using hate for clickbait - or allowing it to use you as deadbait. Thankyou.

My follow up comment:

On further reflection I feel an agenda that sets brother against brother, is using your 'news service'.
The article is incitement to attack or invalidate the 'religious' by the device of choosing to give focus to a particularly absurd example who may or may not be what you say they are (taking into account the 'false flag' tactics of unscrupulous manipulators of perceptions and thus of reaction). Whenever there is baiting such as this going on, there is a hidden agenda, that seeks to benefit from sowing dissension and inciting (hateful) reaction.
I look forward to some News instead of the 'same old same old' endlessly regurgitated from the belly of the beast.

- - -

To two commenters who said:

"You have no right to judge others. The judgement is God's alone. Even Jesus did not judge"

"He did in the stories in your Bible, he was always on his high horse"

I added:

"Judge not lest ye be judged" - is a most profound truth. If you recognize it in your heart it is no longer confused with 'your Bible' or any other reminder.
Jesus, upon being greeted as a worldly messiah, chose an ass. (Entering Jerusalem)
A particularly apt reflection perhaps!
What Christianity makes of Jesus tends to make the same error but if you read the stories you can discern for yourself, if you have ears to hear.
Those who 'already know' cannot receive anything but it supports their own script. They 'have their reward'. But sooner or later everyone comes to need to call on something greater than their little bubble of a self-concept, because it never was in control so much as an illusion of control they clung to.
As you give out so do you set the measure of your receiving, this is a 'law of Mind itself'. What Jesus gave is yet given now, waiting only on welcome. Love is not coercive upon you - why then would you choose to be different?

Another poster said:

"God hates judgmental people! He is the only Judge".

My reply:

To say Love hates is to say nothing as if it could mean something. Such is the nature of the mind of judgement; it can seem to divide the indivisible and then assign and associate its own meanings and assert them in place of a true discernment of the Living.
If one thus 'turns away' from love's meaning, one will experience disconnection and self-dissonance and then assign such sense of struggle and isolation to 'God' - who has taken no part in any of it save to extend Life to you to go forth and multiply the extension of the Gift.
If we choose to extend ideas that are alien or unworthy of the love that Gifts Experience of All That Is, then we have our reflection. That is, we can wake to learn to notice and abandon that in our own mind which blocks the appreciation of true presence/Creation - which is not the result of the lens of separation through which we see darkly.
To take the Name and Nature of God in vain is to use it casually without heartfelt connection. This dilutes the channel of reception and gives false witness that teaches a sense of personal assertion rather than an impersonal love.
To use the truth as a 'weapon' is not to have any sense of the true. Abide in the true and let it choose whether or what to say and then what you give out will also bless you with freedom from such personal conflicts as are 'worked out on others'.
Let the last judgement be a restatement of the First - for God does not change His Mind about His Son - and if you have awareness in any degree you have it in and of the Creator - no matter how ingeniously it may be hidden in stories of judgement, division and rejection!
"This Is My Son in Whom is My Delight". Such is the fruit of the Tree of Life. Look again at your brother and sister and be willing to see even a spark of light in place of 'seeing' what is wrong with them…. but only if it is your will to release your judgemental mind for the discernment of true will… of free willingness.

Another poster commented:

brainwashed offensive lunatics. maybe they just want attention? silly freaks anyway. even their family leave them. they should just be forgotten about and less media attention. i hope they get locked up for inciting hate!

I said:

What about those that propagate their 'message'?
What about those that rigged the 'news'?

Brainwashed indeed!

Re-directed History?

The story of the missing plane continues. Mainstream mostly focussing on the searching  'out there' and avoiding significant aspects that at least should be ruled out in any investigation worthy of the name. This leaves other angles in the fringe where they of course may be hoaxes, disinformation or simply imagination. But there are significant other angles relative to a possible motive of hi-tech weaponry patent, that may be relevant for this particular plane and angles on the technological means to 'disappear' it - as well as to limit reportage of its full facts by all authorities concerned.
But even if the plane has simply crashed and the weird radar anomalies found other explanations, the world we live in HAS such issues in any case. The world of fear is a world of secrets and lies that distort and deny a world arising in shared purpose.

This morning I read this - Flight 370 Was Remote-Hijacked – High Level Malaysian Source

It may not be true. It does deserve some consideration as a possibility - if only to be sure it is not true.

With the capacities of modern technology, a remote controlled takeover of a jet's functions is built into their system. (Some EU countries rejected this technology).
Since 9/11 this has been the case with very many jets built. This option already exists and might be operated according to its apparently original intent - of reclaiming control of a hijacked or out of control plane. Such a system could also be hacked or hijacked by enemies of the state or enemies within the state.

Much of history is directed. There are power struggles that are not reported. There are power relationships that it is felt too dangerous to expose or be exposed in.

While we have no direct evidence of the fate of the plane, we may conjecture, in a good heart, using all the evidence that is available - including the manner of such evidence becoming available and the biases of what is and is not being reported via any mainstream media outlet.
At another level, this event reflects back a current state of consciousness in the range of reactions.
The theme of being denied access to information - and of being fed disinformation, is a growing perception.
Fear works in secret and also can be propagated and nurtured in secret. It is inevitable that withholding, causes people to project their own fears onto "what have they got to hide?". Fear is contagious and can be destructive to sanity, but to the mind engaged in coercive force, fear seems to be both shield and weapon, while actually holding the mind hostage from peace.