Drawn from the Panama Hat?

Botched Panama Papers Leak Has Unintended Consequences for the Elite
Daily Bell Editorial

One of the possibilities arising from ability to hack or surveil others is to set up 'leaks' in order to further political agenda. It appears initially that for all the bulk of info - this is such a psyop by which everyone with hidden or obscured assets has been told they can be 'outed' and the mob primed to legally force such transparency. While this may seem good up to a point, having all transactions made transparent to power that is itself opaque and unaccountable is totalitarian.

#1 Comment:

The idea that toppling the idol (identity mythology) reveals the truth is only realised by a desire for truth. Desire for vengeance or indeed reinstatement as a subtler mythological variation on the theme is otherwise automatic - because the desire for truth is not part of any world-given 'identity'.
I sense the 'witchhunt will be used to shoehorn forcing transparency of assets on citizens and businesses alike - though in practice the law seems to work or be applied differently to citizens than transnationals.

Corporate entities and legal tax avoidance are both defined by law. And it is there that more truly aligned definitions need to replace automatically destructive outcomes - as a result of elitist and exceptionalist cartel creation.




#2 Comment

Soros is involved in funding of such, as in funding of so much else. Hatred is obviously fuelling the bipartisan illusion of US politics - and some incite and fund it. But hating the person is always reflecting something personal in the hater - whereas hating the falsity or illegitimacy of a deceit or a false notion, is natural to a love of truth.
Many hate anything that does not conform to or support the world as they imagine and want it to be - but that is to be so self-centred as to wish to have absolute power over all others. This is normal for an imaginary rage-driven agenda - and billions who engage it are the botnet for a cold light to manipulate such reaction to serve its agenda through your 'free' choices.


#3 Comment

"...such individuals are suffering from a serious mental disorder
in need of medication..."

Please! Note how without knowing it, you are aware of the 'treatment' the state metes out to what it defines as 'a medical' disorder.

If people act in a disorderly way, there are already existing laws and procedures that pertain.

To take on the 'mindset of state coercion' in such a manner is to reveal its thought is your own.

Relational issues are psycho-emotional and have physical consequences. They are not physical diseases requiring Transglobal pharmaceuticals to provide 'treatment' for. - especially under the coercion of the state and overriding the willing consent of the other-defined 'sick' citizen. But if a citizen breaks the law - then his liberty may be checked and the matter brought to trial. That is where the balance for liberty in society is served by the state. In a justice system serving the balance of willingness for liberty at other's expense is coercion or deceit is it not?

Corbyn - a movement of humanity?

Corbyn's policies are much more popular than the press hyenas would ever dare to admit


This article in Herald Scotland amidst a rabid press attracted my attention and led to the following comment:



There is a deeper choice I see in supporting Mr Corbyn - as a politician expected to work in due political process with others to serve the greater good.
This is his humanity - and his advocacy of humanity.

He stands out from the plastic mouthpieces of perceived or pursued power - because he stand in his own presence rather than sacrifice that to a presentation.

That he stands amidst the scapegoating and smearing being directed is testimony of a different kind of experience than the 'cut and thrust of politics'.
Is it possible or conceivable for honesty in political relationship?

Or do we persist in the deceits of feeding into the news speak narrative anything to medicate, manipulate or manage the schism between what we are really up to and what we allow to be known.

That Mr Corbyn has a very challenging task as labour leader - that would be much more challenging as Prime Minister - is not the issue - but while he is the elected representative leader of the Labour Party, the issues and conversations he raises cannot be entirely denied.

The behaviour and function of the mainstream media is being exposed as a more sophisticated version of propaganda for a cartel interest that predates upon humanity rather than serving its good - whilst drawing allegiance from many who are induced to believe they are serving the good of the nation and of humanity - when in fact they are seduced by clever manipulation of their own unowned guilt and fears.

The movement for humanity could be a cross platform alliance - for whatever our points of emphasis, they all need to find balance - or war is the result. Managed war has been the undercurrent to political action for a long time - with the overlay of a propaganda of justifictions and diversionary denials.

The movement for humanity emerges from the refusal to participate in in-humanity or dis-integrity - no matter how cunningly spun or laden with inducements of protection or fear.

Whether My Corbyn, 'survives' politically or otherwise, is not the issue. The issue is a movement of and for humanity.

Of course many mouth the mouth of persuasive appeal with warnings that stir old fears and invoke old allegiances. And many cannot tell the difference between a coercive intent and an extended communication. But life - while it is ours - is an education - and a privilege to share.

Coercion victims

Not only are such articles prejudicial to justice, they are operating their own agenda in the guise of caring.

"Horrific stories
about Bill Cosby were
out there for years.
Why are we only
now listening to these women?"

An inquisition may seem totally justified - but what actually runs its agenda?
Trial by media is no trial at all.
The capacity to feed stories into the media may serve no less coercive and deceitful agenda than what is alleged - albeit taking different forms.
The media may feel helpless to being shafted by power lobbies or it may willingly serve them. But who are the victims of such distortion? Ultimately we choose our own perspective - whatever anyone or anything else 'does'. Then is being honest to oneself a way of restoring true perspective rather than giving our power away to blind fear agenda.

To the issue of violation:
For every action is an equal and opposite reaction.

If the power to assert and impose one's fantasy upon the reality of others and of Life, is associated with freedom and fulfilment - then the result must be hollow loss of all that is true in exchange for a lie.
This IS intolerable excepting one finds support in stories of mutual agreement to maintain a sense of self despite it being the expression of a lie.
So energetically, the secret worship of the power to coercively assert fantasy upon true relations, feeds and supports it as  an accepted part of a self belief of 'human nature'. The law then asserts some forms of this as criminal and others are accepted as the basis of corporate power. The 'will to power' is generally checked overt or brute expression but also operates in guile, stealth and deception.
The attempt to get something from others by deceit is so pervasive in human society as to be almost invisible. It is not innocence - for to adopt its mask one must first be deceiving oneself - in the way described above, of setting a wish more precious than true relation within oneself and operation coercion upon one's own being.The forms of such manipulation open to being manipulated and outcomes of masked or secret appetite and agenda may find alliance in a mutually agreeable coercive alliance, or a power struggle in which one will appears to deny and subjugate another.
While 'victory' may provide a 'hit' of power amidst feelings of betrayal, deceit and worthlessness displaced onto others, it actually feeds them and sets up an addictive reinforcement of the conditions that fuel a displaced and masked sense of self-hatred.
Victim-hood is the dancing partner of abuse of power, and in a sense leads the dancer - for a the self that is raised upon grievance is vengeance of a self-hatred fully justified in projecting hate upon another.
This is not the world we truly live in, but is the world we inherit and have all been initiated into and no hatred is so fierce as that of being wronged and feeling fully vindicated in hating.
Personas operate among other things as masks and roles in a complex script of experience that is privately generated but passing off as a world of self-evident realities.
What is actually happening in our unfolding experience of living is not as our various and competing fantasy-assertions would coercively impose upon our consciousness of Life. In fact any attempt to determine truth operates as a coercive attempt to MAKE it so rather than listen and relate.
Any coercive act stems form or is identical to unowned fear - as is our propensity to accept the role it dictates. Thinking alone does not and will not heal or even deliver practical management. For thinking alone is the result of succumbing to a coercive displacement of un-owned fear.
Justice - to be true - must restore our true living appreciation to us and not serve the 'hit' of a dark self satisfaction. Give the mind of vengeance to the "Lord of life", who lords it over none and that how truth is recognized.
Manipulating deceits never appeal to the love that you are - but always to the fear that you are not. Why think alone when you can listen in the heart?


Said a commenter to the article:

I think there's an issue with people mixing up a character being played for the actual person. That and the cult of celebrity. Irrelevant of whether the allegations are true, he has the power, influence and money to suppress them, and has done for many years.

It's not like he'd be the first major celebrity to have this sort of past, and he certainly wouldn't be the first to still be beloved despite smoke billowing out of the personal hut.

To which I replied:


This is no less true in life. You simply are NOT your persona - but likely have an investment in it as if it is YOU - and others may have an investment in using it for outcomes you do not want.

Power of influence - including money is a distorting influence on everyone and everything- unless you do not want it. One does not have to scapegoat a persona for an underlying psychological insight about human consciousness circa 2014.

Love that turns to hate never was love. Love must be able to see beyond the persona to BE love. The surfaces of appearances will serve the wish to hide within them - unless you wake up to see that is not you and you do not want it.. Meanwhile, self-righteous mobs throw stones wherever they are told - and those more integrated in the power of establishment will NOT be called to account - and if some token sacrifice had to be made to redraw the line, it would only be a token sacrifice to buy off the mob - which is easily done for it is ever engaged in the next thing and has no discipline or persistence - as do those who tend to seek and maintain power.
The celeb is a device for manipulating persona as the persona is a device of manipulating perception. But it can serve to communicate your presence without guile or deceit and being celebrated for what one gives and shares is different from an idolatry of what one can get from them or use them for.