Cultural Underpinnings
of Systemic Capture

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2024/05/11/too-massive-to-comprehend/
Too Massive to Comprehend by Todd Hayen

 

Our culturally accepted values of priority & dominance run masking controls over conflicts of interest that arise from loss of awareness and connectedness of wholeness of being. Where a living presence is substituted for by a social presentation in alignment with ritually required social regulation.
This is also represented in various motifs as an intellectual elitism set over intuitive and emotional intelligence. It is part of a human development of consciousness that we are generally assign to 'progress' - as a symptom of a mindset of lack and disconnection seeking external solutions to inner conflicts that are masked over, protected and compounded as a 'world gone mad' - which ratchets to ever deeper dissociation of addictive dependencies.

The mind invoked and developed to 'cope' with inner-conflicts and resulting 'disconnect' DOES what it defends against. IE: The scapegoating or blaming of the 'problem' in its own symptoms, doubles down in attacking or eradicating the symptom AS IF the Cause, such as to reinvest in false predicates, and follow false profits to compound evils - that drive the engine of 'progress' as a solution to the 'Human Problem'.

Life is to complex to understand IN TERMS of definitions of prediction and control but can be simply or directly 'understood' in alignment to living in the moment at hand. But we are 'trained' to conceive and perceive life in terms of cultural, social and personal models or ideologies - such as to NOT SEE anything as it is. Not least because we are trained to NOT be ourselves, but to present a masking defence that over time we become identified with to the exclusion of our own nature, as a result of the conditioned fear and distrust of our own nature BY which we adapt to survive our respective cultural demands.

That we can have continuity of experience of seeming to understand our world is part of our co-creation of its framework. If we demand continuity and reliability as 'normal' over truth and trustworthiness based in a shared nature or honesty of relationship and communication, then the latter will be sacrificed to an inbred systemic control while its divergence from reality leads to destruction as its mode of change.

Experiential knowing cannot be translated to coercive or controlling narratives but can serve as the terrain of our being in which we can discern truly aligned purpose and compound errors of an inherited adaptive past - that is not here, now, but that we stamp it as the face or a present to conform and confine a future as a line of production as a past made in anger and set in grievance against life deemed treacherous, inadequate, fallen, unworthy or cancerous and pathological to fantasy ideals acted out upon bodies without truly embodying life.

#2 Comment response:

Narrative control is the means to define the currency of thought - especially regarding the funded 'good' and the 'scapegoated' evil.

The goal of seeking power is not least instilled in the belief we are powerless, or the fear that unless we act to take possession others will take it and rob us of the little that we hath. But as a war it subordinates all else - such as communication and relationship - to its goal.

Whenever we engage in such 'war' we are them.

'They' can never be an integrative functional social or cultural movement excepting they can seems so BY maintaining fear of threat of pain and loss as the backstop against reintegration of being, along with the incentives of social status set in narratives of socially protected status.

Coercion and deceit as a power structure is not where the true riches of life are appreciated and shared in