Fact that cant be questioned show you where to begin questioning

 in response to the themes in:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the/

Find established fact that cant be questioned and you know where to begin questioning.
DNA was/is a globally invested technology that did not deliver promised/expected returns.
Like so much else of the 'science', it is spun out of a black box that is linked with or identical to 'dark research' be that military or corporate (its both).
Note 'Intelligence' is now a cloak of transnational security for a global biotech agenda. Upstream to what DNA dogma was supposed to reduce life to, is the realm of bio-electromagnetic field or bio-field. The research into this is the intent to weaponise and marketise 'applications' using nano-particles (which are a natural component in bio-function) but are being designed to 'gain function' from Nature so as to 'fix it' or 'improve and upgrade it'. Graphene Flagship being but one example.
Virology was falsely conceived, unfounded but so invested in as to be too big to fail. It retreated to pathological GENETIC modelling (black-box definitions - but WHO regulates or validates the elite institutions that announce them - often by press release!
So the biological model of life is the most pathological factor involved in all of this, but it is too big to fail as a compound global investment over generations - such that everything/everyone ELSE must be sacrificed to 'save it'. - albeit as a much more rigidly defined and controlled dogma.
The model assigns artefacts to life that either don't exist or introduce distortion filters by which to work against healing - ie as if to boost 'your immune system', or 'fix your genes'.
As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by  germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses.
It isn't just elites who are invested in a pathological worldview, but the Many, whose investment is of a personal and social identity.
So a falsely founded identity in assumed science is compelled to look within the black box of its assumptions for what isn't there - excepting as a derivative pattern - which is pervasive and increasing evident to anyone with eyes to see as exactly like a usurping, hacking virus, or rogue parasitic cancer in its operation at the level of our minds, our currency of thought and our resulting feedback of interpretation we call the world.

If you are precise you cant say 'the vax' when there are known to be various batches of various brands kept and delivered and injected under various conditions, but I feel reasonable in asserting it is a toxic shock at least - for it has to be to qualify as 'generating an immune response'. (Discounting the known switch to saline placebo in at least some conscientious medical staff).

Shock can be also emotional or dare I say it 'psychic'. The overall emotional context for this agenda was of unprecedented and deliberate application of shock treatment to the goal of coercing such and outcome - either for the result of the injections themselves and/or the institutional structure of biotechnological status of bio-insecurity, that is no longer merely inadequate but a risk factor to the 'herd' collective and so no longer holding rights as an individual under 'contagion theory' running unchecked. (quite apart from carbon guilting or thought crime regarding other securitised narratives for economic control, through the enforcing of 'environmental, social and governmental' regulatory requirements.

Many think damage control is still feasible as part of an establishment set in an old normal.  So I expect they will be used for such purpose as a tool of the intent to reset human beings as bio assets for experiment or whimsy.
Genetic control/eugenics is not just for depopulation agenda.

#2
A Midwestern Doctor
The only possible alternative hypothesis I can think of was that the people in charge decided to switch on 5g when the vaccines were rolled out and have the vaccines act as a cover for that. I don't think that's what happened, but that is the only possible alternative hypothesis I have come across.

the tech we sort of know about is not just that 5g can be turned on, but that it can be used in various modes and intensities, that interact with mind and body functions. At the very least to interfere with functional integrity of the biofield/gel water with living systems, and in some cases to affect nanoparticulates - ie to ionic dispersal or molecular clumping. I don't know what is being sprayed in the skies - now officially - under 'weather control' or sun dimming or aerosol 'medications/vaccinations'. It's a black box. Just as the 'elitism' generates a sealed unit in which we are to operate with no user access - not unlike a rat maze in a lab.
So there's a few more far-out possible factors that might play into either the physical or the psychic realm of effects that are both in play.

I am aware that belief in a threat operates as effectively regardless of being real - especially once induced into defences given status of protecting or boosting immunity. So I lean to a world of lies going much deeper than we would think - for thinking was derived from them. But on a brighter note, the lie is only thus as a capacity to pass off as true. So uncovering the false is the freedom to now seek and find truth - not least by refining our questions from an expanding embrace of truth, lived felt and shared rather than 'modelled' for predictive control.

#3

If the spike preceded its 'virus' what is it?
It seems to me to be indirectly assayed by means of the same kinds of 'tests' as generated a test-demic. It is supposed to be produced (minus its virus body) by genetically modified human cells after injection and transfection (via nanotech hydrogels), for that is the stated purpose and function of the gene therapy-cum-vaccine.
But is that taken as fact because experts say? is it another case of cell debris being flagged as 'spike' protein - as a spiking narrative in a mutating novel?

I note the MSMedia(lockstepped as it is) & social media, pushing the memes of sudden death athletes and celebs WITHOUT assigning injections as suspects. This leads the public to 'join the dots' and set the belief as their own thinking - bases not unreasonably on distrust of the whole business of fearporn led globally orchestrated coercion. So while I do believe they are toxic, I am wary to being coopted into consenting against my will by mindless reactions.
In their terms the result they seek is a biosecurity state or a biotech revolution.
I translate this as bio-insecurity status set into technocratic controls even at the level of biological augmentation. In order to get consent I see a narrative of being irrevocably damaged to become a reset for original sin under a new Technate.
Again :- Belief something is so, can function as such, regardless truth - once invested in by reaction. Who has eyes to see is of a discernment in the heart of wholeness or integral sovereignty - that is - within life - not set over or as if apart.

#4
I don't prefer the use of 'immune system' as such but of the natural homeostasis of a living system in maintaining its core functions amidst change and challenge.
I also lean to Hamer's understanding of cancers as 'biological shocks' that have both conflict and healing phases according to the nature of the shock and the organs affected - ie fear of death goes to the lungs.

But I note research on nagalese and GcMAF, such that one is in some sense supporting the 'cancer' growth and the other turns off to allow reintegration.
As with anyone achieving real results for those with cancers (especially the 'go home and die' stage), David Noakes and Lyn Thyer were subjected to thuggery.
While not about GcMAF, the thuggery was very clearly revealed in the documentary "Cancer is a Serious Business", freely watchable.

One we bought into an immune system, we had to keep it boosted!
But our sense of self and life can be shocked, undermined, depreciate and depleted under constant strain and set into recurring patterns of resetting the trauma such as to regress to an incapacity to sustain the conditions for living.