Intent to eradicate and deny Human Existence

Eerie Silence about a New World War
By John Pilger

As the U.S. government plunges toward war with nuclear-armed Russia and/or China, there is an unsettling silence — or unnerving consensus — regarding the potential extinction of human existence, as John Pilger observes.

My comment:

The pervasive nature of the deceits and hateful  - I could say 'evil' acts that are so persistent as to be the reality beneath a veneer of pretence - defies unravelling - for the complexity of the conditioning and resultant identities in operation is too much part of our patterning of consciousness - our sense of self - our basis for thinking. Of course we each don't believe WE are part of the problem - for despite appearances we feel justified in who we are embodying and acting forth to be. Victims of circumstance who are unable and unwilling to question their own consciousness - because conditioned reaction runs in place of conscious presence - or rather masks and filters and distorts so as to operate a false presentation within a falsely framed perception.

As for the 'agenda' of the lovelessly deceived, I believe there is a hidden intent to destroy Earth that corresponds to the oppositional refusal or unwillingness to embrace Life on Earth in any terms but total victory - which is a fantasy ideal that no form of embodiment can ever fulfil.

I applaud a willingness to witness truly amidst a culture of deeply driven deceits but feel the practical point of change is not at the behaviour level - of effects - but at the definitional level - of tacitly or openly accepted ideas and meanings that conflict with the true of who we are. False currency generates insane outcomes. The currency of our Thought is largely hidden within and beneath the 'human conditioning' which is a verb of acted choices out from ideas that reinforce their original imprint.

I sense a general loss of consciousness as we approach a nexus of transformation that seems to split many ways. Lost to fragmentation and conflicted dilution and adulteration of presence. Even if this sense of being shocked, numbed, bewildered and paralysed as prey for the harvesting by predatory 'others' it is still our own individual - and therefore together responsibility to uphold and value our liberty, as an integrity of being - and not a set of rules to war under.

The confusion of the 'thinking' persona with true individuality is a kind of mind fragmentation along with mind-controllers. The deceiver operates almost unnoticed - but where there is noticing - an eerie silence contrasts with every kind of sideshow noise.

Consciousness in denial; The poisoning of the Earth

Consciousness in denial may be a loving essence seeking acceptance (but via unrecognised symptoms which are thus denied). Or it may be so polarised in denial as to simply deny everything but its own need to deny - including denial that it denies. In discerning the difference between these two is your/our salvation and our joy - because while we persist in giving acceptance and allegiance to the death-wish of the intent to escape loving acceptance - we draw it into our manifestation - our life, our society, Our Earth. We give our power to beliefs that then deny our inherent worthiness for loving acceptance which then leave us without recourse to our true presence. And we feel thus polarized into at least a conflicted and trapped identity - and its proclivity to negative expression.

Regardless of the words or forms around it, we who seek to share in Life, need our true presence and NOT a programmed conditioned mind of fear that is itself part of the denial consciousness that supports and feeds the death spiral that is NOT personal power and protection - unless the truth of the love that creates you - that you are - is truly the "Enemy" to what you most consciously accept and choose yourself to be.

I put this message here because feelings DO need to be felt, expressed and accepted in a way that is fundamentally safe. For within such acceptance are understandings released that are not available any other way and which we need for our next step. The 'mind' in which denial hides is not the Mind of a true receptivity. The heart is the balance point of a true receptivity.

Connection restored within ourselves is the synchronicity of connection uncovered in shared purpose. It CANNOT work the other way. One cannot coerce Life into forms of rigid assertion but that one 'kills ' awareness of it.

Planetary suicide is a choice one does not have to judge against with fear and hatred to leave unchosen, while giving one's whole attention to a willingness for Life - based in truly felt relationship. For that which we are most afraid of and work against allowing to happen is still that which we are (unconsciously) feeding with energy and attention.

Energy and attention is the nature of the love that is you. Give it where it is genuinely called for and moves from. "Unconscious" agenda is denial agenda. Our world reflects what we think to have 'escaped' via 'choices' dictated by denial. If we TRULY want a different choice, we have to recognize and release choices that have in a sense become rigidified and locked in as our 'reality' belief.  I suggest we are the unwitting bot-net of denied or un-owned fear that 'THEY' get their energy and support from - whether they be knowingly or also unwittingly complicit in destruction agenda.

(This writing arose from one instance of a destructive agenda - but there are very many that effectively work together, not as a conspiracy - but from a shared assertion of denial that operates as a separating and segregating coercive mind upon Life).

Love's movement subverted by coercive and fearful agenda

I write this because I value MediaLens and what it embodies. It arose from an entry on their Facebook™ page about climate change 'denial' that I felt to respond to.

- - -

The end of civilisation as we know it is occurring in front of our eyes across the whole range of human affairs and is synchronous with significant Earth Changes, but for many the dominant narratives operate to protect from such disturbance and the transforming effect such self-honesty automatically operates. The projection of guilt into external scenarios, scapegoats and red herrings, is the device to keep most of the disturbance outside and away from one's direct awareness and facilitate a self-righteous focus of fixated identity and activity that persist such a psychological defence.

Such device can be seen as something manipulators do to infiltrate, subvert and weaponise a movement of love of Life, of the Earth and its Natural diversity of beauty, wonder and healing resource. But manipulators need suckers whose fear makes wishes seem true whilst carrying Trojan agenda. And so the self-righteous act out the design of a manipulator who sacrifices a part of the old in order to own and control the new - but it is not new - it is business as usual - or even austerities, deprivations and limitations imposed by law with no redress or voice or process of communication and relationship. How dangerous is hate and fear when sold 'salvation' in terms that lock it in to a 'civilisation' founded upon hate and fear.

Well I will say that the end of hate and fear as meaningful or legitimate tools of leverage is the FOUNDATION of Civilisation. Anything else is a house divided against itself - projecting its split onto the 'world' that is does not then even truly SEE, because only the intimacy and innocence of love's presence and love's willingness can allow the recognition of Life in each other, our World and our self included.

Change IS afoot - and those who want to embrace its invitation for a true renewal will recognize coercion and abandon it in their allegiances to any FORM of communication couched in such terms and most of all, in their own thinking. Polarized identity is a symptom of unowned fear and guilt - along with the negative fruits of such - which are not ONLY in the hated, invalidated, scapegoated and excommunicated 'other'. Beneath the divisive device is a more personal set of beliefs that are for many - a no-go area.

Our persona and its mind have developed to 'protect' our conscious awareness FROM such intolerable sense of conflict and powerlessness, inadequacy and invalidity. But I say that THAT is the core issue to be addressed by a willingness to own and accept and be curious about and challenge and invite and allow fresh perspectives in as a result of NOT hiding or denying that we have such core self definitions and that they in a sense rule what we call civilisation from the shadows - where manipulative intent works unseen and unchallenged. The issue must be expressed in terms OF true relationship and communication OR it is an agenda to undermine and block the very nature of our Humanity - regardless of the form it takes or the 'authorities' that is hides behind.

One does not have to KNOW in such a way as to then impose upon others but if one chooses to believe - as a result of ANY process of consideration, then one acts in congruence with one's belief, founded in a current sense of who you feel and know yourself to be. In the shift of perspective that comes from acting with conviction, passion and presence - new perspectives open in which one may or may not revise or replace the previous belief - without invalidating its usefulness to your unfolding integration and expanding clarity. Humanity is not generally awake to the core beliefs it operates FROM.

Crisis is a device by which to face fear and recognize opportunity. Manufactured or usurped crisis is the attempt to use the fear as power - as in false flag attacks, destructo 'capitalism' as the breaking open and plundering of relational and organic systems to strip assets and discard or enslave the forms life to a 'NWO' (sic), or the sheer audacity and chutzpa of asserted lie as in certain 'political' (sic) and corporate 'relationships' that are everywhere 'communicated' by an owned or cowed media.

The triggers we are manipulated by is each our own responsibility to uncover and reclaim to truly conscious discernment. And that responsibility is core to being free of deceit, open to receive, and discerning in willingness to embrace what resonates relevant and true - and live from it. THEN see what happens.

The WANTING to hate evil is also hating to love. See if it isn't so! Deceit is deep in our consciousness and the belief one is free of it is itself deceit unless you are willingly free of the need or compulsion to see it in others.

"It is easy to react to what one has already judged - AS IF meeting something outside yourself".

Global Warring ; Primate Change?

'Global warming not progressing as fast as depicted in worst-case models'

A new study shows natural variability in surface temperatures can account for observed changes in the recent rates of warming from decade to decade.

- - -


The idea of Science is a freedom from distortions of coercive agenda in uncovering an ever clearer current account of what is, relative to where we believe and experience ourself to be.

The idea of a coercive agenda is to want what is to be different than it is, to such degree that the model is used as a lens or filtering framework of misinterpretation.

The ego or sense of self of such a model thus reinforces or defends itself against any fundamental change as the basic psychology of defence against threat.

This allies itself with anything that funds or supports its premise, and forgets or neglects the original scientific enquiry.

A limited and blinkered self-righteousness is thus manipulated as technologism and scientism propaganda for agendas of which few are aware because it is hidden in a blindspot of presumed, believed and WANTED true.

The underlying racket cultivates human self-specialness in order to capture and then induces scarcity in which guilt and fear allow the blatant manipulation of populations. Truly, we do this collectively unto ourselves, wherever we may seem to be on the 'pyramid of power'.

Testing the 'spirits' is discerning the psychology at work. That climate is changing is not in question. The immediate reaction of guilt - as a result of knowingly being out of accord with our nature and our environment - generates a fear driven agenda, and where Chicken Licken screams, Foxy Loxy is sure to turn up.

Re-aligning with our true nature is the restoration of an unconflicted capacity to relate to ourself and others; absent coercion.
Re-aligning science to its true function can raise the dissected corpse of an ignorant and arrogant materialism from the dead.

Planetary climate change is here - with and without what we are doing knowingly and somewhat under guise of obfuscation or 'clever' accounting - and black ops or rogue agenda that include any kind of weather manipulating technology as well as psyops of deceit, disinformation and staged events.

If one believes truth = dominance at all costs, then everything else is subsumed to that belief, for whom the only sin or crime is losing. Once the other is redefined as collateral damage or worthless - there is no relationship; only coercive manipulation.

However raw coercion commands no allegiance excepting the pursuit of tyranny and so the mask must be played out as part of winning the war-game. Without the mask, there is no war. Only relationships of creative challenge and conscious endeavour.

The propagating of dissension in 'either/or' generates polarised extremism at cost of discarding willingness and functionality of relationship and communication. For this is the condition in which the false can not maintain its illusion of credibility.

This calls for pausing of self-righteous reaction and allows observing the nature of our reaction and what is driving it. Personal identity either serves or obstructs our true self, and conflict is the diversionary distraction by which to not recognize what is in fact going on.

Strangers at the Dinner Table

Immigration at the Dinner Table

(Daily Bell article)

- - -

The framework or agenda within which something operates is what it in effect is - whereas when it seems to be something 'known' a hidden agenda hides within that believed 'known' and effects the usurpation of the mind.

Shifting from a personally polarised dissension of reaction that currently accepted frameworks embody to be curious as to what is in effect revealing its cause, is 'looking within' as an integrative context to 'looking out' at the world. (Which is to release the reactive personal identity in yielding to a genuine willingness and curiosity).

We know by now that sowing dissension is the modus operandi of tyranny by deceit, and so dissension itself is a symptom of corrupted or adulterated definitions. Manipulating perception operates by substituting a falsehood or partiality for true. Once one loses a true grounding, the fall can be orchestrated by the efforts of one's own attempt to defend a false identity.

Ideas accepted and acted out have inevitable or logical consequences, which then become the 'market' to plunder, that the idea of plunder starts out from.

Everyone can be seen to be acting in accord with their world as they each and in each moment believe and thus experience it to be. The personalisation of difference as a reactive reinforcement of identity diverts from uncovering one's own predicates or foundation.

An identity in reaction is no true foundation at all and yet seems so very obviously fact when enough agree it true.

There are many many instances of history where confusions and cultural schism of wars and migrations due to calamity have effected co-fusions or blended shifts of cultural adjustments. Social engineering attempts this model manually - as everything of the disconnected ego sense attempts to manually replicate and replace what it otherwise has no authority patent or control over.

War on Life is aka asserting a lie in the face of true. The obvious rationality for this is fear. Fear is not a true foundation from which to live.

Fear's conspiracy

MediaLens.org hosts a forum - I just had a look - and to a thread on the idea of 'conspiracy theory' wrote the following:

- - -

Motivations can be analysed - but not without involving the bias of one's own. The polarisation of perceptions operates war, as the breakdown of communication to the operation of defence as each facet of any struggle in terms of its perceived identification.

For beneath any such intention and act is the self-definition operating.
Everyone always acts in any situation toward that which they define and believe is closer to their pleasure and away from what they define and believe in that situation to bring pain. The key phrase in the sentence is define and believe.

True freedom operates at the creative level of awareness. Whatever we accept as self definition and choose to believe by reacting from such definition, automatically generates perceptions and interpretations and behaviours in accord with such premises.

Anything believed and accepted 'self' will be protected with all the facility of will and strategy against what is perceived and interpreted 'threat'.


Divide and rule is associated with a tyrannous or coercive intent, but it begins firstly within our own consciousness. A split mind is a fearfully defined sense of self conceived as defence within an intolerable pain of self-contradiction. It renders the core issue unconscious by the coercive and active assertion of psychological defences.

This picture of human consciousness as generally accepted, traded and operating as currency, is an overlay or mask that could be called a tacit and pervasive conspiracy to deny and suppress the exposure of one's own loveless or hollow mask by maintaining a busyness of focus away from Consciousness as Presence and upon the world of projected fears and even constructed enemies. For the fearfully identified mask is effectively running away from itself by using its own consciousness and the world-perception of a distorted consciousness, as a screen on which to escape a pervasive pain and validate a personal agenda.

Insofar as psychological discovery can be weaponized, it will be embraced by a fearful identity to generate subtler and more insidious forms of disguise and persuasion for prevailing or at least persisting in power struggle. For its primary identity dictates fearful struggle to prevail and survive against a 'hostile world'.
War demands the active denial of truth excepting in tokenism of exceptions of strategic advantage. War justifies any means to gain the ends that fear justifies.

A pervasive fearfully defined and joyless society automatically operates a conspiracy against exposure - excepting in subverting such exposures to generate its own agenda of power, of market and mind share, of self-reinforcement. The split operates in innumerable forms but is essentially that of sacrificing, giving up or depreciating one's true power as Consciousness to externally defined 'solutions' that tend never to resolve the issue, but disguise it in more complex forms of dependence upon external 'authority', in which illusion of self-specialness or illusion of freedom may be promised but cannot deliver, because one's true presence Is freedom - BUT for the accepting and engaging in self-definitions that are out of true and which generate fear, and split the mind to operate a masked existence, blind to the heart's knowing.

Fear would always frame our choices in such a way as to deny our true freedom. The very tricks and devices that a fearfully manipulative agenda are so audaciously employing to its conditioned 'mind-share' illuminate the pervasive split-minded consciousness that runs like a botnet of fear-feeding consciousness that has in a sense been hacked through lack of true worth and vigilance.

What we accept into our mind is given our power. To accept beliefs that are NOT true of us, dis-integrates or splits off a segregated and segregative consciousness that does works as tares among the harvest. The personalizing of conflicts is the masking into terms that ensure the issue itself will not be exposed or addressed. Any 'personae' will be willingly sacrificed for the sake of the core agenda, and the charge neutralized so that it can not only reassert itself without challenge, but absorb and grow in its multi threaded subversion of all forms of challenge and resistance so as to maintain an appearance or mask of 'acceptability', where such a mask is still strategically deemed necessary.

I wrote this to remind and reflect that we not only have choice but are always operating as choice, whether as an integrative consciousness in freedom to be truly ourselves, or in terms dictated and defined by fears we may not even realize are operating our mind - in our name.

Although there may well be innumerable struggles of an external nature through which consciousness wakes up to Its true nature, I simply offer the reflection that the shift from fear to a true freedom of creative endeavour, must rise from a willingness to recognize and own our fears truly - no matter how much our fear of fear seeks to turn our eyes away.

No one can change that which they have not first owned - even momentarily - for the recognition of holding pain in our heart does not naturally keep holding it another moment! How much less can we change in others what we insist on denying in our self?

If you have a 99% case and bring in 1% of a coercive agenda, the other will detect it immediately and focus upon it to invalidate all else you offer.
Desiring to communicate without hidden appeals of self-specialness or self righteousness, that usually derive from hating or denigrating another, unsubscribes from the manipulative parlance of fear's botnet, extending a light of true witness.

The use of fear for coercive identity operates in darkness. It may attempt to bring illusions of light into itself to feed upon, and to subvert communication, but it cannot abide in light.

The opening of fear to the light of a true awareness is the yielding of a false and life-denying sense of personal power for a true foundation.

Everything expresses its foundation. Using fear as a foundation does not bring forth love or joy in harmony of purpose. It brings forth substitutes for these things to mask what lies beneath.

True foundation restores true perspective and therefore choices and opportunities that are truly integrative and which can see deceits without being baited by them and see past them to the fear in others that operates blindly without knowing what safety is - because they do not know who they are or they would fear not!

Whether anyone receives your communication or not, your giving is what absolutely determines your receiving - that is your awareness of the nature and quality of your true existence. Withholding our presence has been to worship judgement and become addicted or enslaved to the world it brings forth. The mind of divide and rule has no true foundation. The choice for self-power in darkness is on the table for a new era. I believe we all are making a conscious choice and am wholly desiring that this be so - and so I witness to that it is a choice that does not have to be chosen.
The willingness - even momentary - for refusing the 'gift of fear' is what invites and allows a reintegrating perspective. One step at a time, as an unfoldment of truly embracing Life.

Joining in hate is no intimacy whatsoever. Being truly touched by your own recognition IS.
When I typed 'desiring to communicate' I first chose the word learning but typed 'leaning'.
Leaning actively and consistently as an expression of true desire is transformational.
But reactively conforming and aligning with fear agenda is simply more of the same - albeit with a makeover.

I write this in one form or another over and over - but always new. The Consciousness beneath the issue is the door we do or do not choose to walk through.
http://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk

Coercion victims

Not only are such articles prejudicial to justice, they are operating their own agenda in the guise of caring.

"Horrific stories
about Bill Cosby were
out there for years.
Why are we only
now listening to these women?"

An inquisition may seem totally justified - but what actually runs its agenda?
Trial by media is no trial at all.
The capacity to feed stories into the media may serve no less coercive and deceitful agenda than what is alleged - albeit taking different forms.
The media may feel helpless to being shafted by power lobbies or it may willingly serve them. But who are the victims of such distortion? Ultimately we choose our own perspective - whatever anyone or anything else 'does'. Then is being honest to oneself a way of restoring true perspective rather than giving our power away to blind fear agenda.

To the issue of violation:
For every action is an equal and opposite reaction.

If the power to assert and impose one's fantasy upon the reality of others and of Life, is associated with freedom and fulfilment - then the result must be hollow loss of all that is true in exchange for a lie.
This IS intolerable excepting one finds support in stories of mutual agreement to maintain a sense of self despite it being the expression of a lie.
So energetically, the secret worship of the power to coercively assert fantasy upon true relations, feeds and supports it as  an accepted part of a self belief of 'human nature'. The law then asserts some forms of this as criminal and others are accepted as the basis of corporate power. The 'will to power' is generally checked overt or brute expression but also operates in guile, stealth and deception.
The attempt to get something from others by deceit is so pervasive in human society as to be almost invisible. It is not innocence - for to adopt its mask one must first be deceiving oneself - in the way described above, of setting a wish more precious than true relation within oneself and operation coercion upon one's own being.The forms of such manipulation open to being manipulated and outcomes of masked or secret appetite and agenda may find alliance in a mutually agreeable coercive alliance, or a power struggle in which one will appears to deny and subjugate another.
While 'victory' may provide a 'hit' of power amidst feelings of betrayal, deceit and worthlessness displaced onto others, it actually feeds them and sets up an addictive reinforcement of the conditions that fuel a displaced and masked sense of self-hatred.
Victim-hood is the dancing partner of abuse of power, and in a sense leads the dancer - for a the self that is raised upon grievance is vengeance of a self-hatred fully justified in projecting hate upon another.
This is not the world we truly live in, but is the world we inherit and have all been initiated into and no hatred is so fierce as that of being wronged and feeling fully vindicated in hating.
Personas operate among other things as masks and roles in a complex script of experience that is privately generated but passing off as a world of self-evident realities.
What is actually happening in our unfolding experience of living is not as our various and competing fantasy-assertions would coercively impose upon our consciousness of Life. In fact any attempt to determine truth operates as a coercive attempt to MAKE it so rather than listen and relate.
Any coercive act stems form or is identical to unowned fear - as is our propensity to accept the role it dictates. Thinking alone does not and will not heal or even deliver practical management. For thinking alone is the result of succumbing to a coercive displacement of un-owned fear.
Justice - to be true - must restore our true living appreciation to us and not serve the 'hit' of a dark self satisfaction. Give the mind of vengeance to the "Lord of life", who lords it over none and that how truth is recognized.
Manipulating deceits never appeal to the love that you are - but always to the fear that you are not. Why think alone when you can listen in the heart?


Said a commenter to the article:

I think there's an issue with people mixing up a character being played for the actual person. That and the cult of celebrity. Irrelevant of whether the allegations are true, he has the power, influence and money to suppress them, and has done for many years.

It's not like he'd be the first major celebrity to have this sort of past, and he certainly wouldn't be the first to still be beloved despite smoke billowing out of the personal hut.

To which I replied:


This is no less true in life. You simply are NOT your persona - but likely have an investment in it as if it is YOU - and others may have an investment in using it for outcomes you do not want.

Power of influence - including money is a distorting influence on everyone and everything- unless you do not want it. One does not have to scapegoat a persona for an underlying psychological insight about human consciousness circa 2014.

Love that turns to hate never was love. Love must be able to see beyond the persona to BE love. The surfaces of appearances will serve the wish to hide within them - unless you wake up to see that is not you and you do not want it.. Meanwhile, self-righteous mobs throw stones wherever they are told - and those more integrated in the power of establishment will NOT be called to account - and if some token sacrifice had to be made to redraw the line, it would only be a token sacrifice to buy off the mob - which is easily done for it is ever engaged in the next thing and has no discipline or persistence - as do those who tend to seek and maintain power.
The celeb is a device for manipulating persona as the persona is a device of manipulating perception. But it can serve to communicate your presence without guile or deceit and being celebrated for what one gives and shares is different from an idolatry of what one can get from them or use them for.

"Coming Out" as Consciousness, agenda politics and identity conflict

The Tim Cook coming out news brought out a banal comment on a Mac forum.


What you are, is truly beyond definition - but humanity 'plays the game' of definitions very very SERIOUSLY! So if who and what you truly feel you are - (or are NOT) - does not fit in the current CONSENSUAL dictate - then you have a 'path' in life of finding the willingness to accept and embrace what you truly align in as You, and let go of what you are not - without presuming to decide for anyone else. That's their life.

To open and join in real relationship is perhaps the richest and most rewarding aspect OF being human. Perhaps anything less than that, is not yet come into truly human cognisance. But relationship is also deeply challenging because fear comes up from within us in relating to others. Society operates the rituals of navigating and masking or mitigating such fear. Moving through fear uncovers a basis in which we are released of a deeply onerous burden of beliefs or self-definitions that effectively deny our joy in living. Yet most of us feed our fear with compound interest as if a greater indebtedness can become true wealth.

To me the issue of sexual orientation is not the point. The point is a life truly embraced and lived. By their fruits ye shall know them. (And they shall know themselves).
So rather than judge a book by its cover, I feel the qualities that someone brings forth as a presence and communication of life - or the presentation of attempting to pass off as genuine currency that simply isn't.

Gender politicking is something else. I generally feel such a movement is subverted, funded and directed by agendas that care less for people and more for the power interests of a few. As I do with health politics and climate politics - because politics itself has become corrupted.

I appreciated a recent HuffPo conversation opened by gay UKIP MEP David Coburn that touches on various issues - albeit in deliberately provocative terms.

One of the primary ways a deceptive or masked power operates is to make it almost impossible to talk or debate about it's real nature. So it can effectively become illegal or open to vilification to even talk about something in a way that challenges the official version.

In THAT sense I am willing to be 'politically incorrect'. But my interest is in reintegrating the warring polarities of a split personality, so as to be free to more gladly live and share and unfold the lives that we ARE blessed with - howsoever we might account for our circumstance.

Why is Tim Cooks 'coming out' placed in the 'technology section' of various 'news' media? Because are not NEWS media but operate an agenda that tends to align in negative common self interest of fearfully defended masked agenda pretending to be what they are not, in order to get something or to escape something.

Being - existence Itself - is the greatest gift anyone can receive or share in - for all else is OF that and in that. That awareness of existence expresses itself in infinitely rich diversity does not mean it is at war with itself. It simply means that each is true unto its own Movement.

When we are true to ourself we are no longer making choices or accepting self-beliefs that are not! And this has a very different perspective than self-judgement - or the projection of such hatred onto others.

Agenda:
A plan of things to be done or problems to be addressed.
The underlying intentions or motives of a particular person or group.

Gender:
 based on Latin genus 'birth, family, nation'. The earliest meanings were  'kind, sort, genus' and 'type or class of noun, etc.' (which was also a sense of Latin genus).

The 'doings' automatically generate from foundations of template or core definitions. These are NOT personality choices - but the choices that template the personality and its Life themes.

Any corruption or modification of the template must lead to corrupted outcomes. However the original file is 'read only' to users, though sudo embodies unified creative change at all levels simultaneously as 'behold I make all things new'.

So if an agenda seems to be operating that is out of true with who you feel and know yourself to be - then look to the copy of the template that is generating such experience.

If something seems to upset or offend me - why am I choosing to see it in such a way? What motive or payoff do I get from choosing to see it this way and does it make sense or belong as my choice when I see it clearly?
The very act of seeing truy is already the transformation occurred.
Once the snake on the carpet is revealed as a the dressing gown cord, one cant really believe the 'snake' again - but you can insist against your own knowing if you WANT to enough!

If you feel you have benefited from sharing such a consideration, you are welcome to buy me an iPhone 6 - though I would much prefer an ipad for reading on. ;-)
But I don't write for payment - its in the nature of a gift.

I pause and feel and consider issues that come up for me in a particular communication or situation - and take a journey that shares itself as an unfolding of willingness - for no one is persuaded or required to read or follow or accept anything that is not already their own choosing.

That last sentence in itself is a very powerful statement. If we are 'led' astray then in some sense at some level we choose it by where we choose to give our attention. Strangely, what we fear to look upon, always then seems to possess or direct us until we can look on it and look past it to what we love to alight in.