Psychopathic Hatred

To this comment by rtj1211

One has to say that Obama’s lies about sarin gas attacks are worthy of him losing office. Can he be prosecuted in the ICC for such wilful negligence, false-flag promotion and proposed murder??
If not, can he be impeached on Capitol Hill?
If not, can he be forced out in disgrace through resignation before his term is completed?
If not, why was American democracy and the ICC designed so badly that none of the above are possible??
I also simply do not understand the American aristocracy’s obsession with crushing Russia. Are any American Aristocrats those who were forced out in 1917? Were any of them descendants of Napeleon’s armies crushed so brutally by Russia? Are any of them Poles with hatred of Russians in their hearts?
I really would like a very good explanation of that, because the only reason I can see is that Americans are psychopaths who have to dominate the whole world and Russia demands autonomy to be respected……

Clearly the law does not apply, or has no one willing or able to apply it. Notional Security overrides all else. Power plays an open disregard for truth. The power of the lie is at least no longer confused with a velvet glove.
There are many ancient hatreds. I read of the Khazarians holding a hatred for both Europe and Russia - who between them destroyed their Empire. That was a very long time ago - but the result was a diaspora of east European 'Jews'. For Khazaria adopted a form of Judaism.
However, all that is required to elicit hate from powerful and power-hungry people, is to not align with or accept subjection to their dictate - and be powerful enough to be seen as a blockage to be eradicated.
But yes - world dominance - and indeed broad spectrum dominance - which means control of the narrative/mind - food and medical models, - in fact to be as gods effectively - over sub-humans - or humans denied their humanity.
There is a deep seated hatred of Life in the human personality construct - that is usually masked in 'rational' terms of improving it, or managing and manipulating it to align or conform to our fantasy of power over Life.
Few look beneath the persona to recognize the hate that hides behind the veiling smile. But I see our times as being the exposure to ourselves of ourselves - and I mean that in terms of the unconscious and subconscious forces that run almost invisibly through us as a result of a surface persona founded to operate the suppression or evasion of that which we personally and collectively deny awareness and acceptance of - except in the hated scapegoat.
Reasonableness and rational good intentions are part of a collective desire to suppress and perhaps 'rise above' a base nature or hateful intent. But there are those who see life, humans and themselves as predators and as being without scruple in claiming power as the prize of a ridding themselves of the weaknesses and make-believe - that lesser men have to use to protect their minds from the stark and only truth - as such a compulsion to eat, possess or dominate Life - must see. There is a kind of god in this - in that it is the demand for sacrifice. And the kind of humanity that is set on such hidden foundations is one of sacrifice of Life to idol of self-concept that substitutes for Life.
And so we sacrifice the truth of our presence to conform and fit to an idea of who we are supposed to be - or indeed who we are not allowed to be.
Denials are invisible as long as we don't trigger hate by breaking the rules and conditions that are largely tacitly induced and agreed in very early life and reinforced throughout. But see how quickly 'love' turns to hate when the 'rules' are not kept. It NEVER was but hatred withheld.
There is a recognized syndrome of victims who 'love' their abusers and interpret the withholding of penalty as 'love'.
This is more true of us that we might like to recognize... on both sides of the story.

Without a deeper honesty - and I might add a natural humility and compassion arising from there - there is no resolution to the human recycling of hate - though it gains global reach through increasingly pervasive technologies.
Maybe forces will rise against hate in hate and sow a new crop in a seeming respite? Maybe we recognize that we no longer want any part in it and therefore have to find a different foundation from which to live and through which to appreciate and share Life - instead of hating it because it does not meet our conditions and demands.

Cognitive Dissonance - levels of fragmented dissociation.

An interesting conversation on this page:
BoE Set to Save the Day, But the World’s Banking System Is Set to Fail

Bruce C commented:

Maybe the "middle road" explanation is that central banks, politicians, etc. think short term and always do whatever they think will work for a while and will ameliorate whatever current problem exists. Longer term problems are literally not their concern.
That's why I think CB's et al will continue to do whatever they can to keep the ball rolling. However, at the same time, I think they have the uncanny ability to almost always do the wrong things. That's why the theory that they are nefarious on purpose keeps cropping up, because it doesn't seem possible that an institution (central banking) can be so wrong so often. That's understandable, in a way, but there is far more evidence that mass stupidity is to blame than evil intent.
Look at it this way. When Janet Yellen speaks does she really seem like an evil genius, or an academic dolt? When Mario Draghi talks is he a brilliant tactician or just an a-hole? When Haruhiko Kuroda effuses does he seem inspired or robotic? When Mark Carney speaks does he seem diabolical or just dull? Et cetera.
Personally, I very surprised that the Fed hasn't raised interest rates this year. Asset prices are "too high" and they're starting to climb higher. Raising rates would tame that tiger and signal confidence in the US economy and strengthen the dollar. Not doing that will create more problems but I really think it's due more to stupidity than opportunism.

To Bruce C:
    The hidden agenda is largely operating via various levels of denial or 'unconsciousness. The so called 'conscious' level is not at all the narrative reality played out by any compartment or facet of fragmented Consciousness. But the narrative itself will have different levels - of public, private, top secret and forbidden etc.
    Different levels of 'need to know' operate different roles within their scripts and I feel that the USA - I haven't forgot the original 'American' basis of the US - is a good example of almost total fragmented dissociation - of broad spectrum cognitive dissonance.
    You cant expect a breakdown of communication to say - "I am a covering over a communication breakdown and by this I include the communication of raw emotional expression - but you can expect the mutual self interest in maintaining the cover story to operate divide and rule in place of bringing a truly receptive willingness and an honesty of witnessing that is not merely the public, but the private, and the top secret and even giving witness to the forbidden or denied reality that none the less is active but blind-sided.
    In the so called conscious level we attempt to use rational thought to 'see' with - when the rational mind is primarily founded in justifying and maintaining the mask or persona called forth to cover over the raw emotional splitting off into fragmentation that is both a cause and effect of mind-control.
    Lies must hide in truth and so from the point of view of the 'secret power mafia cartel' under any or no name - inner circles within circles operate that have a front in legitimate endeavour of at least plausible deniability in the event of confrontation.
    Most human beings are unable to maintain a lie unless they believe it is truly justifiable.
    Addressing the persona rather than discerning the validity of the foundation upon which the currency of a masked hate agenda operates - is the diversionary tactic that diverts awareness from true/false recognitions, into good/evil reactions. The chief method to justify an evil, a hate or lie is to be in righteous defence against a WORSE evil.
    Until the self righteous hate and the reaction to scaremongering thinking is paused for a truer perspective - there can be no freedom of choice. Only the winding up of a system to its breaking point. For no matter how much control is operating in any number of complex ways to maintain a narrative presentation of relative 'worth' or temporary 'security' - the cracks in the model open exponentially. There is no broad spectrum dominance - unless Planetary destruction can be seen to have solved the 'problem' - and for a pre rational sub personality urge "I hate myself and want to die!" is an active agenda that breaks out more and more through the loveless lack of acceptance for true worth that operates a lie of coercive and deceptive substitution. Such a life - SUCKS! And powerlessness and voice-lessness gives power to hate.
    So the personality level of each and every one is either aligning with the reintegration and acceptance of a wholeness of being - or playing out the struggle of power that runs all the way back to our core separation trauma - which is another way of saying we have not really moved past it - but covered over with level upon level of fragmenting dissociative plausible deniability - and the last point of change we look to is our self. But here am I and this is my experience. Once I recognize deceit in myself I cannot engage it as if it were true currency again. I cannot un-know - though yes I can 'try'. But there is a self-betrayal that drains the motivating joy and capacity to share life. Fear of consequence can drive the 'trying' into a deeply sacrificial attempt to regain a sense of life by whatever pattern of self-validation drives the sense of needing it.
    The naivete of the social mask is the belief that people are basically trying to work to a common goal and keep making (the same) mistakes - but they are not mistakes - but are by design - and that design is implicit to the power struggle of the survival mentality - regardless how it masks in moral apology or justifies itself from grievance. However, when I use the term Humanity with an H - I don't mean human insanity. An I don't see insanity as organic disease requiring state control through pharma - but relational conflicts that manifest communication breakdown; a call for healing.
    Earth has been likened to a prison planet and I link that to an asylum planet.
We're all Mad here!
    But are we in fact 'here' in the sense our identity defines us as, or are we here in terms of a current focusing of idea and intention, of purpose and desire?

   Bruce replies:

    Hi, You mention a lot of good stuff that I want to chew on, but right off I like your observation that "the narrative" has different levels of not only communication but actually boundaries of thought. Dissociation and cognitive dissonance, as you say.
    That's a more sophisticated way of saying "stupid" which I know is not the best term because it's so "subjective", which means it could range from meaning literally limited cognitive function/ability to cognitive dissonance which is almost the opposite in terms of potential.
    ...More later, but I want to make sure I understand your reference to "America". I think you're saying that its founding principles are sound and consonant but the way the government/"Deep State" has evolved it is anything but. If so, I agree, and ironically that "intelligent dissonance" can effectively be as incompetent and indistinguishable as sheer "stupidity."
    BTW, how did "Brexit" work out for you? Not to probe but I'd be interested to read your POV about what went down.
    Thanks for commenting.

Hi Bruce - opening inner reflection is where I invite - and not to argue over 'what is right' - so gratitude for your synchronicity in a shared appreciation.

Not knowing or openly owning and expressing what you know because terror defines the believed consequence is not stupid within its own framework - but playing 'stupid' can be a strategy of survival - and of setting off chaotic or destructive outcome by design - as part of hidden agenda. But playing anything that seems to work and playing it for real is the survival mode of psychological 'defences' that operate beneath the radar of what might be called our consensual reality - which as noted - has different levels and compartments according to the defining and triggering conditionality. Indeed it is the shadow power or denials that actually operate - while the narrative paints a censoring illusion of control via the same tricks that operate somewhat subconsciously.

So the above construct in consciousness - taken without  the living perspective that embraces and transcends the psychological conditioning - is only a getting mechanism operating blindly as a sense of struggle upon a sense of Life that thus seems polarized in mutually exclusive opposites.

Of course the blindness here is cognitive - as a filtered and distorted version of the 'movement of being' by which existence has awareness-experience of being. There is a range of perspective available - perhaps an infinite range - but ... one step at a time - at least while time serves the recognition and balancing of the expansive/contractive polarities of perspective. I may be getting too abstarct here for most - but suffice to say that a 'dalek's eye view' is fearfully defended, mechanically limited, yet destructively directed - and any of us can experience this when we feel threatened and cornered. However, the fear imprint is much more deeply embedded than the conditions that trigger defence and should not be underestimated in its capacity to subvert and sabotage even the best laid plans...

Perhaps my presumption of the USA as a representative model on the Big Screen of a fragmented and dissociated conglomeration of parts - asserting narrative controls at different levels in various compartmented agenda - was misplaced. I'm not accusing - but feel that extreme examples serve to illuminate what lies hidden in our own less obvious presentation.

'America' is used as a subliminal religion by a narrative identity of exceptionalism - that can be expressed - and does express in many ways. Was it stupidity or wisdom to NOT stand up as a US citizen after 9/11 and challenge the asserted terror and war narrative - not just of what exactly happened - but what the happening was timed and used to implement upon both its own citizenry and the world? Or was it shock of a more complex order than the outer scenario seemed to justify or represent? For there is a terror of mind-breaking and therefore mind-controlling extent - that diverts and displaces into destroying 'enemy' almost regardless who serves as scapegoat. A coup-d'etat of the mind. But also a revealing of the way it works.

Brexit is an ongoing 'project'. The pre referendum campaign operated a narrative that hardly allowed any coverage or witness to what the EU is and does, what its origins are, how power operates through it, who effectively set it up and has undue influence over it - and the globalist agenda it is subverted to. Nor in the so called debate was there any real expansion on what sovereignty or freedom of self determination means - or can be redeemed to reveal as Meaning.

I voted for a pause from conditioned reaction in which to open a process of communication in place of a complex technocratic scam by which to further sacrifice a truly Human willingness to a loveless mechanism in the guise of power and protection.

Others voted for whatever reasons or from whatever intuitive sense they then rationalized. The inescapable sense of the whole thing being managed tends to ascribe evil agenda to the hidden hand. But I also see just how people's fear demands a managed outcome - and although opportunism preys on such blind 'trust' - I also remain open to the guidance to use the event and the experience for the purpose, I, freely accept and recognize myself in - which is not defined over and against an evil - so much as uncovering or redeeming a sense of Life lived and shared - which is an intimacy or presence - not mere concept in rehearsal presented for mutual reinforcement.

Change is generally anticipated, managed and controlled - and inner circle insider knowledge can be one step ahead of any outer rings - so that differing narratives arise as to what is in fact going on and who knows or did what as part of reaction, response or strategic presentation - for there are a number of threads running through this - any of which can be an overriding priority of focus to those involved - and thus a filter of exclusion and distortion relative to other threads and perspectives.

Insofar as I am aware of the founding of the USA I see the attempt to define and codify something of the true - that becomes the trojan form in which error and the machinations of a mind un-recognized, operate against the true while keeping and using the form. Power interests do whatever is in their power, to survive and prevail - in the terms their identity sets. Relational interests communicate whatever is true of them - to honour and retain the recognition and meaning that reveals and renews an identification within Life. A confusion of both has power predating upon relationship as a means of getting power - as if meaningful in and of itself, and a sense of broken-hearted, denied and oppressed isolation amidst struggle to survive.

No matter what the power-relationship embodies - it has honest feedback to a willingness for communication - which is as I said above - infinite in range - but one step at a time in acceptance and understanding - which is not so much a personal possession or accomplishment, as a point of balance and alignment within a 'movement of being.

Regardless of impossibility in the face of all prior human experience, I feel for awakened self-responsibility as a true 'founding' - and that is the willingness to find the balance point by living the discernment of it within relationship - rather than fixing it in externalized rules that then become coercive upon rather than guiding within. Not anti-rules nor anti-authority - so much as uncovering true authorship. Do I need to hide my true desire in forms of a defended coercive persuasion or appeal?

Brexit confusions #2

Brexit: A Workers’ Response to Oligarchs, Bankers, Flunkies and Scabs

To this comment:

Would people such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and other wealthy and philanthropic capitalists be valid exceptions to Ayn Rand’s (below) statement?

“Capitalism and Altruism are incompatible; they are philosophical opposites; They cannot co-exist in the same man or in the same country”…….Ayn Rand

No - for they give to get. You can use the internet to uncover more than PR.
But just because Ayn Rand said it - does that make it true?
What is altruism? Service to other? She saw it that way but I disagree.
What is capitalism? Service to self? If no self is celebrated free to discover and share in - where is joy in life? In sacrifice to an 'idea' of the 'good' of 'others'?

Serving self and serving others can and often does hide under the mask of the other and operate a mutually exclusive polarisation in which their unity is perpetually obscured or denied: divide and rule.
Division of self and other is presented as self-righteous judgement - whether of victim or perpetrator.
Do you invest your attention, time and energy in that which has no return? BUT if you uncover recognition that being the true of you depends on your willingness to give true witness TO others and To your world - then there is a basis from which to love your brother as yourself - but not as 'personalities' or persons. Identity politics begins with the sense of disconnection and loss from that which identifies you perfectly. Thus rises the mind and the mask of a personal sense held over and against that which is associated with disconnection and pain of loss. As such it is negatively or segregatively defined 'self'. Human being contains the capacity to re-cognize mask as a strategy - and therefore not Self - from this honesty comes an integrative movement of aligning in joy of being rather than in aligning against the conditioned associations with the denial of joy. A positively aligned self is not 'trying' to be 'good or right' - but simply aligning in a clarity and capacity for communication - rather than seeking to control the narrative to engineer or manipulate agenda or outcomes that assert righteousness or try to present under a seeming 'good'.

Why don't we just be open and honest in uncovering and communicating what we want?
Because there is a heavy - indeed terror backed sense of denial - along with a deep sense of unworthiness. Some of us feel more identified in a sense of loss of power - and so dedicate our lives to the attempt to regain it - or the seeming of it. Others in a sense of loss of love - who seek that in the world no less. But the world of the persona is a masquerade or matrix of seeming by which power of love lies hidden - for there is no love in 'divide and rule' - nor any power of living in the sacrifice of joy to a blind law (or god).




   Brian H said:

    I have no idea. Who knows what the actual set up of these “philanthropic trusts” are. From what I’ve read, about the Facebook billionaire, he has “given away” about 50 Billion dollars, but still “owns” and retains complete control over the funds.
    Sounds like a “tax dodge” to me. Maybe someone can clarify how it all works……….

        Fronting trusts, organisations and institutions can be and are used as proxies to ‘astroturf’ a larger hidden agenda. Especially when the Media lacks the capacity or the willingness to expose such deceits – and becomes a tool for their operation on the gullible and cynical who like to believe they are sceptical – but are actually captured minds – or part of Branded Mindshare.PLC


Seamus said:
....Then there’s the deeper, philosophical problem with the whole notion of ‘charity’: when an oligarchic elite manages to control virtually all of the wealth and power in a society, and expects us to jump for joy and act grateful when they oh-so-magnanimously share a tiny percentage of it with us, that is dehumanizing and patronizing. The world doesn’t need charity; the world needs socialism–worker control of the means of production, and of wealth and power in society.


If someone - including the State - offers you something, it is up to you to feel if there are strings attached - and be aware of what you are getting into. If something is truly given - then there are no strings attached.
Any centralized control mechanism is open to being corrupted by political and indeed corporate power. Any attempt to organize a cultural and communitarian solidarity has been undermined, subverted and denied by the power class - regardless their political 'face'. There is little or no representation for human community. "Socialism" has been co-opted to serve as a face of the corporate-state - as a technocratic bureaucracy of manual mass management or 'social engineering'.
True charity is never wasted. A mean spirited and miserly inclination to focus on the hateful as self-justification passes off as true currency. I don't know what the 'world' needs in terms of the form it needs to take - but I do know we need a true currency of thought - and a grounding foundation in something that isn't just more spin.

Brexit confusions

Some of my responses to various comments into an article that sought to frame the Brexit issue in a 'workers perspective'

- - -

I get it - you did not get 'your own way'.
Excepting your still insist on seeing everything 'your own way' and see everything different in very negative terms - and calling on very negative outcomes.
I voted leave because I feel for a shared humanity worthy of more - so much more - than a corporately contrived and controlled technocracy. But out of the frying pan is not yet clear of the fire. Collectivism operates the sacrifice of individual sovereignty, and a false or corrupted  individualism operates an exclusive elitism to which also true or free willingness is sacrificed.
People largely do not have much perspective or articulation of their predicament - or if they might - they keep it hidden because it is not felt safe to come out amidst such a hateful blame culture as has become the basis of socially engineered and managed 'normal'. In fact it is only felt safe to come out with some kind of hateful negative opinionated put down - as has been established 'normal' thanks to the subversion of the institutions of our society - and in particular the Media.
Everything we accept as our thought, colours and paints our world, our part in it and its response to us. It isn't that I feel we get the world we deserve so much as the world we serve up and make real to our experience by accepting it true. If responsibility = blame, then bad choices condemn you and us all to bad outcomes. But I see true responsibility = choice, and in recognizing  a choice that doesn't align true, I can now make a better one - thus even negative experiences can serve a positive outcome. Blame and hate culture is not this or that system of governance but must undermine any possibility of communication and exchange in any such system. But it is none the less a vote for accepted outcome in which responsibility is not accepted and lived - but denied, evaded and sacrificed to socially engineered 'rules' by which those at the top of the hate pile get to dump on everyone else and believe that privilege to be power in life.
The only way to a better appreciation of who and what we are, is an honesty of being that seeks and finds a better sense of self-definition, from which to see - and extend - a sense of worth. Don't believe for a moment that all the accounting statistics are anything but mass evasion of responsibility. If the environmental and health costs were truly accounted for then almost none of our corporate 'economy' would be profitable - and even disregarding the destruction and degradation of Life on Earth - it operates a debt scam into which our Humanity - of the embrace of Life on Earth - is sacrificed for evaporations of wealth, power and self-specialness. For those who want it their own way - and are positioned to get it - are imposing it without the willingness of consent. For we are stupid dolts who cannot be entrusted with Life - and so must be socially engineered, managed and manipulated to keep ourselves that way.

In reply to:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/07/19/brexit-a-workers-response-to-oligarchs-bankers-flunkies-and-scabs/comment-page-1/#comment-35200
- - -


A corporate protectionist cartel serving its own interests at expense of yours - but presented in deceits of extended power and protection from threat. EU've been had. But nor is the nation state able to serve a representative willingness for Life on Earth unless we truly embrace and live such willingness. From a basis of a sense of wholeness - we can open and join in relationships with others. But you must know that our 'representatives' are at best trying to make the best of a bad job - for our corporately driven influence abroad is not 'internationalism' excepting a power class of transnational elitism eschew any relationship or responsibility for the host they asset-strip.
False foundations undermine all possibility of true outcomes. The banker always wins... unless of course we played to a different tune.
Whatever else 'Brexit' might be, it is serving a divide and rule 'hate' agenda that operates a perfect smoke-screen for the real power moves to occur unnoticed.
Reality is too disturbing for ordinary 'citizens' and so they are to be fed a version that empowers their fantasies so as to better cope in increasingly compressing terror of powerlessness. The 'devil you know' is often chosen above an unknown in which to discover - but I say the devil we think we know is boiling its frogs slowly - so that they do not recognize the terminal nature of the heat - nor simply jump out.

Basically Everything is Changing. (Anyway and regardless). Position yourself within the currents that you feel Life in - or cling too the driftwood of 'paradigm lost'. Uncovering true foundation is the only real option. Now, or defer Now to later - to some other moment of some other day awaiting some other conditions in hope of some other choice.

Currency is corrupt. False economy. Sacrificing the Good into the bad and cooking the books to make it seem as if someone is in any kind of control - apart from control-freakery gone mad! It is the end of the world for such control-freaks - but do they have to drag everyone else down with them?

In reply to:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/07/19/brexit-a-workers-response-to-oligarchs-bankers-flunkies-and-scabs/comment-page-1/#comment-35201
- - -

Working class had a function. 'Useless eater' has none. As workers are replaced with more easily conformed and cheaper 'units' and with automated robotics, they are discarded and 'encouraged' to self-destruct - whilst providing revenue stream via tax and NI. Whereas aristocracy operated a paternalism of managing the farm, a globalist cartel of corporatocracy bleeds 'profit' from disinformation, sickness, death and destruction and no matter what political 'face' it wears, operates a very different pharming of mindshare - or indeed mind-control.
Reclaiming our lives is a matter of questioning the terms and vocabularies we 'think' in - for identity-politics is the manipulation of masked or denied fears that has us seeing everything and everyone in terms of what is 'wrong'.
There are wrongs that call for correction - but identity-politics appeals to self righteous hate - which does not recognize itself as hate - being of course wholly justified against an evil or wrong. But hate feeds the war that operates on every level of every aspect of our human experience. I don't say deny and blame hatred. I say we have to feel what we feel, long enough for a deeper perspective to unfold - for there are always deeper perspectives beneath the triggered reactions. I don't write to a collective polemic - but simply in individual witness to a sense of human worth beneath the confusion and hatred that covers it over with distorted sense of un-worthiness.
I see I have two legs and arms and that they work together in common cause. If my mind offends me - I pluck it out - or not use it as a basis for acting in any way that harms myself or others until a saner perspective rises to replace it.
A core and FELT - sense of Humanity rises in place of divide and rule thinking. Its an ongoing willingness of commitment - not a smug 'answer'. How another identifies or defines them self is not my business - but how they live and act to me is where I meet them and it is what is lived that finds communication or a breakdown of communication - and a willingness to find common cause or not. I cannot do anything for your choices excepting to live my own - and share witness from which you may freely align with or not as you will - as you feel and know and accept yourself to be.
Compassion embraces supportively in solidarity. Sympathy operates destructively as the 'gift' of a presentation in place of true presence. Beware of the mind born of the sense of self-specialness or superiority - and celebrate uniqueness and diversity as a working together in common cause. In shared purpose. In living purpose that truly CAN share and be shared in - not an ideology.

In reply to:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/07/19/brexit-a-workers-response-to-oligarchs-bankers-flunkies-and-scabs/comment-page-1/#comment-35223

Destructive agenda behind the mask

How far back behind the puppets and fronting organisations do you need to go to find a globalist agenda that operates  destructively under the aegis of creating a 'new world order' - as if hate can be used to serve as a means for a goal that is not hateful. For it is a hateful cold 'rationalism' that operates as the 'thinking' of the few imposed upon the many.

Indeed the fewer they get the sooner will the 'one' seek to claim its 'place'. There is no satisfying the addictive identity of power because the Place of First cannot be gotten by force or guile - only usurped and thus open to being 'stolen' back.

The appeal to a sense of personal power as 'over others' and as protection or privilege from aligning with it - is a 'Luciferian' dream - in which no 'other' can disturb or interrupt, deny, challenge, hold back or hold check, a sense of unlimited power... to serve what exactly?

Because without embracing a living relationship of growing trust and recognition is no Life - whatsoever. The fulfilment of such 'authoritarian rule' is a dead end - and appeals to, and uses death as power over Life  - in wielding terror as hate and rage - masked of course by appropriate personae - until perhaps the curtain raises to revelations of a different movement than that framed as its own thinking.

In Reply to:
 flybow

In the UK, the EU did not force austerity, and privatisation on us. The new labour/tory government and cameron et al did it all by themselves.

Private agenda and Externalities

None of the world’s top industries would be profitable if environmental costs were fully integrated


The notion of “externalities” has become familiar in environmental circles. It refers to costs imposed by businesses that are not paid for by those businesses. For instance, industrial processes can put pollutants in the air that increase public health costs, but the public, not the polluting businesses, picks up the tab. In this way, businesses privatize profits and publicize costs.

My commentary:

If the focus is kept exclusively in 'externalities' then trouble at home (ie: inner conflict, denial and denial of such denial) can continue without exposure.
The use of external patsies, proxies and scapegoats all operate as the projection of evil intent masked in relative innocence or blind self-righteousness.
The out-sourcing of blame, guilt, debt, fear and pain are the inverse inner narrative to the appearance of a positively acquired 'power' - as a sort of negative version of 'pass the parcel'.
The personhood that operates as is the currency of blame being equated with responsibility - rather than choice. Therefore we indenture ourselves to mind-traps of blame-defined and therefore false 'choices'.
The corpse of persona - that results from using it as a manipulating leverage is a golem that can be engineered and operated by the corporate 'person' - which is the god of mind-management and indeed to ownership and pharming of mindshare.
The results of living or thinking and acting-out-from a negatively defined sense of self are inherently and necessarily destructive to the integrity or integral value of natural being - and are targeted at natural being to invalidate, subvert, and eradicate it - excepting to keep enough life running to feed off of. Therefore it operates coercion and deceit to harness and commandeer or usurp natural allegiances, functions and abilities. The 'outer circles' operate an anti-life agenda in the firm conviction they are following a health regime, or serving a positive force in the world. The inner circles dictate the core narrative - which is masked with 'civilised' veneer as it translates into the outer circles.
The inner circle  operates an elitism of presumptive right to judge and to rule over. This is replicated in all the captured 'minds' - which operate in the belief they are 'minds'.
As long as this mind-aligning in power is accepted in place of a truly receptive and expressive will - the communication channel with Spirit is effectively blocked and therefore inspired imaginative shifts of perspective are denied - even when they come thick and fast as the messengers otherwise defined as 'negative consequences' and targeted for eradication or mapping out of an ever contracting loss of true Consciousness.

Behind the political shenanigans

Behind the CIA’s Failed Coup in Turkey: Was It Only a Dry Run?

Whatever anyone else MIGHT have intended or done - I can be certain of what I use the event for. Not in terms of defining a narrative for anyone else - for that is their freedom - but to recognize and use what is meaningful and relevant to me for my purposes.

A volatility of shifting 'alliances' masking assets in power struggle that operates at expense of whatever Human Life might unfold to become should it be given nurture and succour to so become. Power struggle that stretches back into conditionings that are deeper than our history can recollect - but re-enacted over and over and over without any real 'evolution' of the core separation trauma that the power struggle embody in a kind of insane or negatively reinforcing pattern.

My willingness for embracing Life on Earth is toward the recognition of a call to evolve beyond hate-fuelled vengeance - and that means feeling what we feel without giving it a blank cheque to operate hatred in our name. Means and ends are one - and where we are 'coming from' is 'where we find ourselves arriving'. Using the outer reflections to discern the inner conditionings allows consciously connected choices to replace ancient hatreds made in the dark, Running in the dark and keeping everyone in the dark.

Corporate Personhood

While specifically about Hillary Clinton and Corporate money influencing US politics - this article raises the idea of corporate personhood as a false notion - to be abolished.

I write into the underlying consciousness as I see it - around the ideas being enacted.



Corporate cartels and regulatory capture, usurp any idea of state, as serving the balancing of the whole, and operate the law and the defence and upholding of law - as a weapon of subjection.

The appeal to law for justice, for voices and interests to be heard and taken into account - and for the violation or overriding of such interests to be held to account - has within it a balancing of freedom with responsibility.

Corporations have such undue influence as to operate parasitically on their host nations or populations - and simply strip out wealth to turn it into debt. Debt that is outsourced as degradation and misery, and debt that is wielded as financial influence or power over debtors.

'Currency' is not just fiat money control - but also the core definitions of life and world that are foundational to the sense OF self and world that are in that way 'agreed' by the fact of operating out from them as defacto true.

An identity based or rooted in a sense of lack - feared or believed - can only bring forth and multiply lack in whatever forms it manifests at every level of our human experience.

I see the primary root of a sense of lack is associated with a wish to be more-than and a resultant fear of being less-than.... You Are - or have accepted and believed yourself to be.

Being 'right' or not wrong - not lacking in validity, is a fiercely defended 'assertion' of judgement. Forcing your 'right' upon others and your living world - along with invalidating their right - by coercion or by subtle deceits. Becomes split into the public or surface struggle of power and the private 'identity' that appeases or conforms to the outer whilst maintaining a hidden agenda.

“Someone convinced against their will is of the same opinion still.”

Thus there is what might be called an unconscious, subconscious or masked hatred of being coerced, violated, limited, forced, deceived and betrayed - etc etc - that piles up in Humanity like a toxic debt bubble - and which the surface mentality becomes no less fragmented into deceits of compartmentalised narratives in 'holding power' that is equated with holding order - and therefore calling on survival instincts.

However - when survival of the sense of power calls forth the degradation and destruction of the 'enemy' - which has effectively expanded to become the human race and our Planet - the insanity operates evil - "anti-Live".

Our most primal sense of coercive identity arises against the sense-feeling of 'evil' in order to attain a relative innocence over and against it - and the expression of denial and hate - as a sense of righteousness.

I see our denied conditioned imprinting coming up to an exposure that of course triggers off every kind of defensive reaction in attempt to maintain narrative continuity. But unlike when first such psychological 'deceits' are employed in forming 'personality' - there is now some free awareness within which to recognize the devices at work and to see that they in fact don't work for but against a current sense of self and Life - and so re-align in ways that do.

The struggle of powers has no free attention or awareness from which to open choice at a deeper level than the fear agenda dictates. Nor is it inclined to listen to anything that is not weaponizable or marketizable - and as such is a negative 'loop' running on the energy and attention of allegiance and support given it.

I am not talking only about 'Them' here - but of each of us as we have capacity to recognize and abide in seeds of sanity long enough to grow a perspective from which to live - and therefore establish as true currency within a moneylender's scam.

In seeking validation. Hillary Clinton has to find forms of popular appeal - and this can bring subjects into debate that otherwise are effectively denied. But once the votes are captured, the politics of power no longer need voter support - and can present all kinds of disinformation as to why they in fact do not keep voter promises - or distort them so as to use them to gain even more 'power' for an insanity to operate unchecked.


Reflections on Persona


You cannot find a person if you dissect a body - can it be proven to actually exist?
Personhood itself is definitional currency of communication. You give one to have one. But what you give may in fact deny the nature of the one you ‘accept’ - and they must then accomodate a split reality - that operates against our nature while pretending to be natural.

Persona is a mask - and yet also becomes an interface or matrix through which to experience and interact in the human experience - which is not merely physical survival within a set environment - but the creation of a model of its own existence projected upon - and becoming its environment.

The personality construct is the embodying template that brings forth experience in or through a body - and thus of the world of which the body participates.

A corporate identity seeks and finds validation in finding reinforcements with or at expense of others corporate or body-personae associates.

The Rule of asserted power makes law the dominant validating definition - and out-laws or limits and denies any other polarity within Consciousness. But such law is the law of sacrifice of true nature to the idea of power over nature - and within its terms nature is given ITS attributes of treachery and cruel or heart-less loss, suffering and death. All seemingly autonomous personae operate within the matrix of the law of sacrifice - as if validation or worth is only attained or regained through the denial of that which an otherness to Life defines ‘other’ - and indeed threat.

The reversal in consciousness of the order of cause and effect - operates as the idea of the independence of power over Life - as an ascendency of status and worth - but arising from experience of denial and rejection, and consequent sense of betrayal, violation and disconnection - that then operates as the HIDDEN basis for such a sense of power to operate out from. This is an expression of a lack of light of acceptance seeking its own substitution in forms of possession and consumption - as if ever such could deliver more than a fleeting sense of fulfilment in an unassuagable appetite-driven need.

Transpersonal or spiritual recognition, rises from looking on the HIDDEN foundation from which we had been set ony to look away from. For a fear of intimacy arises from unresolved relational pain - indeed trauma. Mind-control is a perversion of mind-focus.

The freedom and fluidity of focusing awareness as attention and desire is our creative inheritance - blocked and definedby trauma arising from extreme imbalance and conflict.

The notion of person needs to be re-evaluated - as do all of our founding beliefs - if they are not to bring us to utter ruin - both without as within. The result of identifying in a bad investment is to pour the good into the bad, while ‘interpreting’ the result as a self justification. Regardless what the world or anyone else says - the consequence is not escaped. Truth is no respecter of persons - and meaninglessness does not change as a result of consensual belief in its necessity as a foundation.

Intimacy embraces and transcends persons - but ‘getting’ or ‘taking’ can never have, hold or know and share themselves in love - and so getters are for-getters - and will seek to make a world ‘forgetting’ - in a transactional hatred hidden beneath the hollow forms of a mask of ‘love’.