Friday, 9 January 2015

Freedom to communicate is not a weapon

Charlie Hebdo Shooting: Maori Broadcaster Derek Fox Under Fire For Victim-Blaming Comments on Paris Terror Attacks

Freedom to blame, to invalidate, attack and undermine other people - in the name of 'freedom'?

Hatred born of fear and guilt can take many disguises. None of them are free to love. Love is free to create - but deceit can only work to deny, distort and destroy. Who wants to be outraged and offended or use proxies for their grievance, will seek and find the basis for justifying hate and attack - on some level. Is there not a fanaticism that denies and subverts all communication in the name of 'freedom' - and it works every side of every conflict. For it makes the darkness in which to operate and grow in power unnoticed.

The deceiver is for many an archaic term for an agenda that operates destructively, largely by remaining hidden or in disguise. In any potential event of undoing by exposure it will sacrifice 'others' by scape-goating them as evil, worthless and heretical or insane. It offers 'righteous vengeance' to cover over the evil one fears in oneself.

In a world where false flags have been historically shown to be normally part of a war of manipulating perceptions to trigger predictable reaction, one is wise to look and see what agendas ARE being pushed. The 'war on terror' propagates terror. It increase darkness against light of true understanding.

When Jesus said "Resist ye not evil" he taught a fundamental creative responsibility - for what one focus on and feeds attention to, magnifies.

Murder is murder. Incitement or provocation to hate may be foolhardy but doesn't call for or warrant murder. But those who believe they are aggrieved, will believe it the basis for vengeance in one form or another - and hatred is not a sane perspective.

Is Derek Fox embodying freedom of speech? Are those who vilify him trying to shut down his right to free speech? In such confusions as are our world, we un-mindfully react and compound them. Fear is not a true foundation from which to live. It steals our joy in life and ravages our world. Seek a true foundation!

Gary Carkeek  reacted thusly:

The fact that Fox was able to make his comments is proof he (and we) are allowed to - we have freedom of speech. Evaluating another's words is also freedom of speech, and being disgusted by it is not and attempt to 'shut down' that right. Do you honestly not get that?
To Gary I say:
Communication is - as far as I am concerned - an exchange within a relationship. The use of communication as a weapon of coercion or manipulation operates to deny relationship and communication under the 'name' of some appeal for an ideal such as 'freedom' or under the appeal of self-righteousness in opposing something tarred as 'disgusting'.
Manipulated consciousness is in many ways, the current world order, and works by guile and deceit such as to deny its own exposure. Personal or collective emotionality is not holy, but it is a point of leverage for manipulators.
Vilification is an attempt to deny or invalidate another. Can you not address the issue without attacking the person? All choices have consequences. The idea of acting without consequence is a false idea of freedom. What we give out sets the measure of what we get back. If you believe emotionally backed coercions will free you, you will believe in their reality when they rebound.

So much miscommunication arises from holding completely irreconcilable self definitions, from which irreconcilable notions of freedom extend automatically. If one is 'allowed' a freedom, is it then innate or true? Who 'allows'? Who or what is the power that chooses to allow or disallow freedom? Is it that which consolidates through fear? Can reacting fearfully truly express freedom? Is not fear's dictum, 'divide and rule'?

Emotionality is not holy - but a true capacity to feel is innate to our Soul and our sanity. Tokenism may posit its 'proofs'. I suggest that 'political correctness' gives rise to fear of vilification that is actively undermining our willingness to communicate and relate, but merely reacting against it only feeds its appetite. War breeds war. War is the condition in which light cannot enter, truth is denied and persona agenda indulged as if THAT is freedom.

Freedom to assert what one is NOT at the expense of what we truly are, is the insanity of
human-un-kind. To uncover this in part IS disgusting in ourselves and so most will seek to get rid of it by whatever means asap. True sanity cannot be founded on running away from what we hate and fear in ourselves in attempt to put it out upon the other and attack them so as to aggressively disown our own part. But this pattern is a collective human defence mechanism that operates destructively in our midst. It generates and feeds war and woe.

Also please notice the comments you reacted to were questions inviting consideration and not assertions imposing themselves on the reader. You missed the very next sentence after the one you misread.
" In such confusions as are our world, we un-mindfully react and compound them".

Are you free to evaluate or is that already sold out to a defensive reflex? I do not mean this to demean you - but as a moment of noticing how easy it is to react to what isn't there - but which the mind believes is there. This is the direction of enquiry that uncovers opportunity for healing and unifying in place of polarized insanity.

Wednesday, 7 January 2015

Hijacking scepticism

Hijacking of Scepticism to Subvert Critical Thinking
In response to a comment-article on wakingtimes.

Deceit is the assertion of who you are not – as if it is who you are.
It can use any role or appearance including questioning as if it meant to communicate. Some operate within the mask of respectability and others lack not audacity.

Questioning that operates a hidden agenda of statement – is indeed propaganda. True questioning extends true relationship.

To keep the mind open is to at least be willing to consider the possibility that what one thinks or currently believes, may not be true, so as to listen to or consider new information.

Cynicism and gullibility are two poles of self certainty that operate a racket by which an apparent difference maintains a dynamic of changing relationships or ‘struggle’.

However a truly open mind is undefended to knowing – because it is willing to accept it does not know. Knowing is a wholeness of being in which there is no conflict. It is a unified alignment of who and what you truly are – from which to live – not as an authority over your own consciousness – nor of others or the world. But as an embodiment of wholeness.

The mind of hidden secret agenda first points out and away from itself to OTHERS – so as to be relatively less burdened with the consequence of conflicted mind or fear and guilt. Having projected it AWAY, it is then operating as if it were a private separate power upon Life, operating through its characters and script.

Why do we always presume evil intent is in the minds of those who withhold or hide in deceits? Is it because we believe we know ourselves the same? Do we try to excommunicate or deny that part of ourself in ways that often, generally or always give it power in the dark instead of healing it in light?

The first mistake was not the error of false thinking. false thinking evaporates to have never been. It was the attempt to hide the error from God (Light) in order to persist in it while trying to correct ourselves alone.

What else is this but to say we all choose to ‘play in the dark of a mind that covers over its connectedness with self-justified hate?

Beware the assignment of evil to anything alive – even if others allow themselves to be used by fearful and coercive agenda of hidden personal terror.

“Resist ye not evil” said Jesus – who knows that what you focus upon, give attention to, and share in, is what you feed, multiply and become.

Obviously he was not passive with regard to the confusions or attempts to confuse that he met in (his br)others EXCEPT to choose not to escape from or dally within the projected hate and denial of those who felt threatened by what he reflected in them.

He actively put deceit and deception behind him and when meeting the schemes of fear driven trickery, was able to speak from a true presence of mind instead of being baited into personal reaction.

The crucifixion of true Innocence of being is a pattern in our consciousness that we re-enact by sacrificing our own connected joy-in-being and denying and projecting the fact in assertion of victim-hood or powerlessness and grievance seeking vengeance.

The world CANNOT and WILL not hear this for it depends on this dark secret to seem to persist as coercive and conflicted personae on a dark stage.

But You who are the joy in being CAN hear this and let it shift you to see a world of a different foundation than one electing to persist in denial, guilt and fear – and all the progeny thereof.

To think one can really change without uprooting the false is to secretly serve to propagate another crop of tares.

I referred to Jesus as an example – not as an appeal to ‘higher authority’. It is the discernment of one’s own heart that must test any and everything – including what information or guidances to accept or trust.

Coercive intent is the telltale of a hidden agenda. It operates all sides of every apparent conflict to cover over true relation and communication. It does so as your ‘protector’ while you dally in darkness that cannot abide in light.

Turn to light and true protection by giving ONLY as you would in love receive. That is – by pausing from reaction and checking in at the heart in silence of one’s own assertions – so as not to be taken in by what you have truly recognized as something you do not want and does not belong to you.

True governance is uncovered within an inner integrity of being. Unless we live FROM that, we merely enact the shadow roles for fear to persist in feeling validated and thus persist in denying its own redefinition to serve a wholeness of being.

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

Branded slaves?

Can someone please turn Russell Brand off? Headlines a personal comment 'article' by Gareth Platt in the IBT

If we really want to turn someone 'off' we give our attention elsewhere - or if it is simply a behaviour and reaction in ourself we want to change - we can perhaps engage a process of communication within ourself and perhaps with the other.

The idea of turning off what one doesn't want and turning on what one does is properly the job of making conscious choices from a connected sense of true being and not a reactive attempt to validate or escape a sense of being fearfully or falsely defined.

Anyway - here's what I wrote in the comment box :

No one can or ever will, represent me - but me. However, in EVERY one I meet I may find facets, attributes of idea and behaviour that resonate with me both positively and negatively, and I may choose to use either of these to obtain a positive result by the purpose I accept and use them for.

The subjection of communication to  'correctness' or vilification and invalidation, operates a 'war' of denial upon communication. The basis of this 'war' is called lie, propaganda, deceit, vanity, arrogance - do you get what I am saying? That Communication of a true nature is a complete kit - for everything true will manifest from it and only a the assertion, allegiance and identification with un-truth can interject the confusion and division of a personal war to determine truth as power to invalidate others.

But truth that can be used as a weapon in hate and fear is not true - regardless its original source and context. The 'devil' quotes Scripture. Our minds at the persona level are masks within a game of powers that goes nowhere in self destructive vanities and arrogances.

The nature of the personae becomes the screen of diversion from the actual issues being met, faced or suffered.

So it is perhaps ironic that Mr Brand - what an apt name! - is branding himself as a spokesperson for speaking out against the unnacceptable facade that is progressively mind-manipulated and 'normalised' by establishment media, politicians and corporate and financial vested interests. Accepting the unacceptable is an exercise in displacement or mind-splitting. No matter how ingeniously the mind personifies itself in order to project and redistribute fear and guilt, such only operates a false basis truly experienced.

Focussing on the personal is choosing to keep the problem hidden and largely redefined and diversioned. Focussing on the underlying issue always identifies definition and belief in consciousness that is out of true. Holding this in the light of awareness INSTEAD of using it for personal attack or self or other invalidation of blame or shame DOES open a shifted perspective - a more UNIFIED and communicating perspective - a less 'split off' and wilful or unwilling defendedness. And so I recomend it.

Our society has branded its mind into mindshare under obeisance to a mind-manipulative 'power' to get. Be it consumer or corporation - the operative to get operates the propaganda of lovelessness or disconnected attemp to 'get' life from others instead of growing and sharing in the Life That Is.

Using what is wrong with externals or others to assert a self-righteousness asserts a hidden anti-Life agenda of deceit, vanity and arrogance that always becomes the very thing it hates - for that has driven it all along.

Branded slaves lose the power to speak or even think along any lines but those their master imprints upon them. Letting Mr Brand iconify freedom of speech and thought may herd a significant mindshare into a managed resistance that can be turned to whatever use the masters want. But resonating with freedom of speech within one's own heart and mind can and does uncover a true basis from which to extend a presence of communication that does not play into the mind-games of attempting to be or accepting role of the master of another - even for apparently good causes.

"For though the rules of the road have been lodged, it's only people's games, you gotta dodge" Sang Bob Dylan. But actually it is one's OWN that one has to identify and align or drop. Wherever information comes from that is relevant and resonant to who and what you truly are - pay attention. It is for you.