End of the Story or vengeance as usual?

Under the article:
Trump, Watergate, Nixon, Rockefeller: the real lesson

jerseyg said:   

If “they” didn’t want Trump to win, he’d have never gotten into the WH in the first place. Their high tech weapons could have taken him out long before he even won the nomination. Let’s get real here. Attributing all the power to the Rockefellers and Rothschild and then acting as if they created such a monumental blunder of letting him slip through to the presidency is a ridiculous assumption. He is beholden to the zionists. They financed him through his failures. He is their puppet. End of story.

- - -

"End of story?"
Rather, the continuation of 'Story' as 'narrative control'.
Look how everyone takes a part in the framing of events. Are we being manipulated? Or are we suckling the juices of our own emotional investment?

But your point is that Trump - for all the 'outsider' status - (true within certain levels of identity aligned within Establishment Was) -  was/is being run by 'insider' cabal - even if as a 'controlled explosion' or shaped charge.

No asset - allowed or installed into agency of power or influence - is to be allowed to out-serve or out-grow its purpose. Nor will such a notion of power itself out-serve or out-grow its purpose.

So while we invest in Its framing as our own aligned identity - such purpose serves out its time in Story.

One of the realisations of noticing (aka mindfulness), is that attention WAS scattered and fragmented in preoccupation with fantasy of past and future imaginations. But the 'continuity manager' or ego of self-sense runs the automaton of a fantasy life or subjected virtual reality of adjustment to its lack of presence - so as to present worthiness, love or power - as if one had it. Possession is the name of the game - for who would possess, is thus possessed or entranced by the game until played out.

Story calls for sacriface in justifiction, which is backwards. Original nature creates from a just or true awareness in which no one has to deny or be denied, to behold it is good - very good.
A false sense of rightness asserts and propagates the very 'evil' it sees in OTHER - as its own blindness. Some carry this role to extremes - but it takes one to know one. Noticing allows awareness of choice and change in place of an apparently unchangeable self, mind or reality.

But the wish something be true... or not true - resets and reinforces the conditioned imprint of the golem. Fantasy fulfilment has one outcome - no matter how often repeated... unfulfilment. Be that structured upon the symbols of love or power.

In a book I appreciate is the line: "There is no life outside Heaven" - and yet of course what passes as life, is traded in and exchanged and made real to such mind-drift into unreality - is viciously defended against wholeness of being, against a light in which a mistaken identity is no longer accepted or accorded real. Gone!

- - -


A further comment in the page:

"The people spoke loudly enough"... (referring to Trump's election)

Was that rage seeking vengeance or a refusal to accept false power over true sovereignty of being?

I'm not asking anyone to speak for anyone else - but to ponder that these can be co-fused and reversal operate such that the demonic is accorded faith - or the true healing messengers - demonsided and killed.

Post Brexit vote - The Sky is Falling!

Sterling’s down, sales are falling, shoppers anxious: gloom gathers over the UK economy

The scaremongering stick and the fake carrot were not just brought out for Brexit - but they have been significantly disregarded. If you start to see the narrative control that mainstream media operate - you will read them with a different set of eyes if you read them at all.

It remains that very many ARE conditioned to react as triggered and so the hyping of the psychological operation into a actual outcome favoured by this or that corporate cartel interest is almost stage managed theatre. Follow Foxy Loxy if you want - but the real Owlsy Wowsy is not on the other side of the river - but is your inner discernment - and you don't need a phd in mind manipulation techniques to smell a rat and withhold allegiance and support - while remaining open for more clarity.
ANY direction taken is only as positive as our wholly embracing it for its positive opportunities. Fear is a self-fulfilling prophecy - but denied fears no less - so owning the fears is part of finding greater and truer resolve.
Bankers and corporate cartels manipulate us all and have done for a very long time. It is the Law that needs restitution. And I mean restoring to a servant of the Whole and not a technocratic instrument of manipulation and deceit posing as benign collectivism.
And why we are at it lets restore a truly free Press - by our support for true witness wherever we find it.

- - -

...the low pound means foreign companies will look more favourably at investing in the UK and if Osborne follows through on his proposed reduction in Corporation Tax, this country will become a very attractive place for foreign companies to set up shop.
The following comment brought another response from me:

But alas whoring ourselves to transnational corporates invites a slave economy where workers pay all the tax burden and companies get special inducements to come and then suck wealth and assets out of the country in the trickle up evaporation of absolutely insane debt - for the richer the company - the more debt they 'manage' as a flow of leverage and influence.
Biodiversity is  a key to health. The microbiome is foundational to our human health. The soil is killed with toxins and starved of nutrients while monocultured crops are artificially fed. Transfer this recognition to society - and reground yourself in a participance of endeavour and relationship rather than a managed and pharmed set of conditioned reactions. One cant think sanely from an insane foundation. So look to free your thinking - or free yourself of conditioned reaction that passes as thinking. What does the drip drip poison media feed us but the undermining of worth - and then sells its narrative as the framework to think in. No thanks.

Herd Immunity to truth?

Notes on Herd Immunity from Andrew Wakefield


My comment:


In the forms it takes such ignorance and arrogance is tragic outcome of evil consequence, but the core pattern revealed here is part of the human conditioning - and I feel to offer consideration of the underlying conditioning which has multiple outcomes of a similar nature in setting what is generally accepted as the 'human condition' and regarded as necessity , nature or reality.
The mind's intent or attempt to usurp the movement of being, the nature of being and the experience of being is that of a mind at war or in conflict within itself, with its world and other minds.
Whilst some of the forms of this are socially acceptable and even core foundational elements of the current social paradigm - such as 'conquering nature' or redefining evil in terms of germs or genes that can then be manipulated or replaced with manufactured 'improvements' or chemical and genetic interventions.

The quack-mind sells an 'answer' to a problem defined in terms that hide or obscure the real problem and it is appealing to those who are afraid or unwilling to embrace or open to a communication of such conflicted nature - who willingly invest instead in ways to hide or redefine and redistribute the problem - into terms that effect a mitigation of awareness of pain and fear and a narrative by which to keep such issues unconscious or denied acceptance to conscious awareness.

When the narrative paradigm or model breaks down as a reality it persists as a lie at expense of truth where before misperceptions and mistakes operated in a false framework unknowing. The conviction of self-righteousness is gotten from opposing the feared 'evil' of negative and conflicted feelings that have been projected and associated with the narrative forms of sin or sickness and therefore also to any who are seen to undermine or oppose the righteous cause of denying such fear to arise/such disease to break out.

This is collective insanity of dissociation and identity confusion - but the underlying fears or conflicted sense is reality - even if pushed into unconsciousness where it operates as shadow activity through us while we do not realize it is so. Such is the nature and power of the mind-narrative of self-justification; it is unaware of the mistaken or incomplete nature of the ideas from which it operates and thus literally "knows not what it does".

The desire for vengeance and the eradication of 'evil' sets a false foundation from which to live and gives power to hatred under a sense of self righteousness. However, it is healing to be truly received and given acceptance for being, and the experience of being denied is a deep-seated sense of separation trauma that re-enacts indefinitely regardless the shifting focus informs and roles of cultural fragmentation. We have each grown a sense of self to 'survive' notwithstanding the sense of loveless disconnection that our life in the world has become almost equivalent with.

Sanity of wholeness is an integrity of relational communication, within and without. The replacement of communication with coercion or war, is revealing of unresolved conflicts that are refused or denied healing through a willingness of communication - a term I use for the noticing and embodiment of Life and not merely for verbal mental constructs that have attempt to define and control as their driving force.
True presence is not a presentation of oppositional assertion manipulating via guilt and fear. In seeking a true discernment, we have to release our investment in such identity to recognize and align in a truly felt quality of being. Or else we are deceived by a mind founded upon our own  unrecognized fears... accepted as unquestionable truth.

Such a mind is 'immune' to truth and herd immunity means that only moments and glimpses break through and are immediately denied or subverted to serve the persistence of the war-mind in masks of acceptability - because this seems to offer power and protection where love seems weak, unreal, or ineffective amidst  fear's Reality - and so must it stay, if such power is not to be lost - and at whatever cost.

Free willingness to embrace our humanity is un-willingness to sacrifice it to loveless agenda. Even though we open to conflicts seeking resolution or symptoms calling for healing and wholeness - it is a perspective shift to release the sacrificial struggle and grow willingness for life in Life's terms, rather than conforming to fearful or negative self-definition.

Rather than being defined by fighting the old, to grow the ever anew by living out from a felt quality of our being instead of a mesmeric mentalism backed by ancient fears and hates. Speaking truth to that which is accorded power is actually extending the worthiness of love's awareness to the potential of recognition. Otherwise we become polarised within the attempt to force an outcome in self-righteous arrogance and become a new version of the thing we say we hate.

We all have belief systems that limit our capacity to imagine and embody Life, and yet are part of each other in uncovering and sharing life. Or we are all part of reinforcement for each others fear - and the call to power that such fear elicits. I can only live my willingness as I find it. I cannot influence anyone who is not of a like purpose, and if I try I will generate opposition without and lose presence to a coercive investment; to a power struggle.

Unclear Nuclear

The Trillion Dollar Nuclear Weapons Fraud

Over the years, as we have helped debunk elite propaganda, from elaborate NASA hoaxes to vaccine cover-ups, it has occurred to us more and more strongly that something is wrong with at least parts of the “nuclear narrative.”

Here's an add to the mix: There are significant accounts of UFO activity around missile sites that have coincided with disabling missile launching capabilities.

In the principle of being free to unfold our own choices but not free to choose to significantly deny others their own capacity, Humanity is free to destroy itself within a range of probable futures - but not via means that is destructive to other 'civilisations' that are part of the larger collective of which we have effectively forgotten at the level of the filtered consciousness we take as our reality.

Of course the military personnel could be suffering hysterical delusions and the documentation falsified - but I have the sense that the power by which we are subjected is our own - but in ways we have given away under beliefs that are now invisible to us because they are called reality.

This comment prompted my further response

Whatever the veracity of any interpreted experience, which is ultimately between you and your true Source (and nothing really can come between unless you believe it and give it the power to do so), I see the increasing polarisation of the 'dark and light' and I mean that in terms of functional terms not value judgement.

I recall Seth talking of serving the transition of a militant Muslim as the scene and set by which to bring a unified recognition to one who was polarized in form. For the underlying recognition is the correction or transcendence of form-based meanings - whose apparent fixity is reflecting inner needs or indeed inner convictions of guilt threat and need for defence - yes being acted out as an experience in time and space.  Here we are - but where really is 'here'. Perhaps that is all I will say now but we are not really in any thing but we define it so and spontaneously remap to validate and reinforce what we have accepted and shared.

This forum being a 'news commentary' is predicated to focus on the 'negative agenda' which reinforces a belief in victim-hood and the struggle for power, concealment, subterfuge and deceit in which to abide until vengeance can come forth and abuse the abusers - or some other proxy scapegoat as if freedom waits on the world to re-align with the rules I gave it.


This Comment (Into comment conversation): by tom

"Don't believe anything. Regard things on a scale of probabilities. The things that seem most absurd, put under 'Low Probability', and the things that seem most plausible, you put under 'High Probability'. Never believe anything. Once you believe anything, you stop thinking about it". ~ Robert Anton Wilson

My response:
This is also saying truth is never in the model or in fact a conclusion or 'see' definition in fixed terms. Truth is in what purpose you use the model, or idea FOR.

Your purpose is either aligned with who and what you feel and know yourself to be - or not. It is popular to blame 'them' for deceiving 'us'. I suggest that there is a subscription of which we are not currently acknowledging. We do not recognize ourselves in the symptoms... as yet.

When reality deconstructs as a result of a fundamental and pervasive dis-integrity - aka insanity of dissociation that depends on deceit to persist - the conflicted nature of the mind; of its concept-perceptions, communications and acts becomes intolerable - although cooking the frog slowly can invite oblivion quite painlessly, once it is induced or forced into 'secure' confinement.

This is what 'mind' in the sense of persona was invoked to save us from - and yet the thing we thought to escape is in its very foundations and brings the fruit in accord with its roots no matter how well presented our personae might be.

There are many polarities of mind-strategy - such as more intensely 'controlling' (limiting) consciousness so as not to feel the pain. The principle limiter of consciousness is fragmentation, division, conflict, and a deadening off of receptors to communication where such channels have been traumatized or burned or hollowed out from experience of denial, of treachery, betrayal, abuse and abandonment. The element of running away from our self is witnessed by restless thought, emotion or activity that has to maintain diversion from a lack of presence appreciation - indeed from a force of negative self-appreciation that will change your mind should you attempt to use your mind to 'see' why. It doesn't 'see' anything but its own model of presumed reality. One has to pause the mind to relax or shift to a perspective in which to notice the mind-in-act. All else is conditioned 'reality'.

The reversal set the outer symptoms or form reflections of inner definition as the causes - while therefore denying the Causal aspect of Consciousness in which such definitions are thus effectively hidden and rendered 'unconscious' or indeed TABOO!

If you break primary taboo your tribe, group, family, society will disown, invalidate, curse and reject you. EVERYONE learns tacity what is not allowed because fear and guilt teach them.

The abandonment of reaction from any existing set of conditioned thinking  is a willingness to wake up from the dream of the independent persona with which you may be equating your self rather than accepting and embracing as part of you that serves the purpose you now give it. With this comes the willingness to feel the pain of the underlying conflict rather than re-brand the belief in symptom-suppression as the necessary context of survival. But feeling into it in the purpose and willingness of healing and awakening active responsibility for consciousness -  instead of 'limiting' control and outsourcing or deferring pain.

The mind of generally mutually agreed definitions we call the world or reality is not inherently fixed - because what mind is - is inherently open as a medium of communication. "Judge not lest ye be judged" because what you use your mind for becomes the measure of your experience of it. Such experience conditions the subconscious to 'fix' belief in reactive strategies driven by guilts and fears including the power of denial. As is evident minds can seriously engage in questioning whether they exist. The power of the mind is in ANY belief accepted and acted from as true or in place of true.

Actually once you believe something it becomes invisibly part of your thought - your world. The symptom of the articles and our age is one of reversal.

Belief is not appropriate to things but to purpose. When you uncover the true within you it is not embodied in thought or form - IT IS YOU. Your life gives it form by acceptance that extends as belief in yourself as currently recognized, accepted and appreciated.
It is not necessary to actively believe in truth to experience it directly - but it is necessary to pause or put aside - if only for a moment and belief that actively operates to deny it.

On the principle that it takes one to know one, the self-judging can only 'see' others in the same lens and under the same conviction. Using this we can use our perceptions to 'reverse engineer' awareness of the mind from out which we act as if our own - and in that recognition, release self and other from definitions that are realized unfitting untrue or counter to who you prefer to be. Once a habit of thought is uncovered, it becomes a choice.

Choosing has been falsely framed and sold as freedom when the range of choices makes no real difference because the real choice is framed out of the picture. This is where a denial consciousness has to open to recognize not merely its 'choice' but what it is choosing between. A real choice is between alternates that are tested for their nature and consequence and this means  a true accounting of each. It could be said that the principle of necessary evil is that of succumbing to the 'devil we know' of established and believed power, because we associate terror, pain and loss with the 'unknown'.

I suggest that it is what we have made of Life that terrifies us and not what it innately is. Of course we experience this under the narrative 'what life has made of us'. Victimhood is not what it seems and beneath the face of any who treasure it for what it gives them is rage quick to strike out in righteous hate if that face is in any way unveiled to its own participance.

Perhaps survival never was part of the 'plan' in terms of a multifaceted unfolding of rich experience - excepting as was necessary to gather and grow the consciousness that must now metamorphose - that is yield to change that it is not accountable for or in control of. When we recognize our life we have a basis for surfing or uncovering the balance points amidst whatever moves within and without. When we insist on some other assertive or imposed narrative - it simply cannot serve but to take us ever more out of communication. If loss of consciousness is your choice - then keep thinking that you are what you think you are, or the feeling of being will weaken your resolve with recognitions that weaken the tower at its very foundation.

Who cares what anyone thinks?

I was not able to get the main comment to accept at the page titled
Beware of 'What British Muslims Really Think?' on Al Jazeera

I don't focus on Muslims any more than anyone else in addressing what I see as the issue that moved me to write.



"Correctness" of form operates personal or political power as a kind of thought control. But - as an old saying runs - "who is changed against their will is of the same opinion still". It is behaviour that is 'controlled by systems of incentive and penalty, and what can pass off as obedient alignment can thus hide in the form of being correct or acceptable and accorded respect.

What a 'man thinketh in his heart' may be undercurrent to surface or allowed 'consciousness'  - but is always active as the communication of current focus and acceptance. No one escapes their purpose.

So "what we really think" may not even be what we present to ourselves to mask or hide deeper and intolerable sense of rage in self hatred or fear - and so is it to the world that we also mask - and mask ourselves in. The masquerade of a struggle of powers to mask from, deny or distort communication, is itself an order of thinking that runs deeper than many who 'walk the world in armature' will ever imagine. But is reflected in our world because to mask something is not really to escape it - so much as to create a private 'mind' that automatically seeks and finds validation and reinforcement - that is - it operates to survive and prevail AS private and apart from and 'over and against others'.

The nature of an emergency of assertive imposture of control over mind leads to the loss of functionality of mind as a focus and channel of communication. Thoughts instead of opening and multiplying a scope of creative communication, become locked doors, brick walls and prisons - along with magic keys of promised escape from such 'prison'.

Definitions and beliefs that are no longer aligning true with who you feel and know yourself to be thus become as if sealed or locked in by 'personal' and group persona identities. So much so that issues can no longer be addressed without being subverted to the 'clash of personal identities' in which all sides of conflict operate to protect conflict as the source and determiner of perceived power. While calling on one's 'justifying script'.

How we obviously are defining ourself in relation to consciousness, power and identity is often a reversal of the true order - as a private assertion of self seeking external validation - and thus invoking and feeding external 'power' that undermines or invalidate inner freedom to receive and imagine and create real relationships that bring and share riches of many kinds and qualities.

The mind that is not aligned in the heart of what is consciously felt and known in true presence is often seen as a deceiver - and with good reason - for it is used to justify a false or masked sense of self - that has taken something of the true but set it in a private context of its own unquestioned thinking.

True willing is aligned within - not conformed without - though of course there is a parental role in the guiding of children to their own inner integrity of listening, feeling and knowing. Adults should not be encouraged to be passive dependants on state or any other institution. The desire for parental power can become a destructive obstruction to the development of consciousness whilst taking on 'controls' it cannot meet - and thus become overwhelmed and vulnerable to negative inlfuence.

When anything of the inner is turned to weapon, it loses its true or whole meaning to serve as mask of power.
But when turning to the inner within a true willingness for communication and relationship, is to pause from 'weapon' and discern the issues beneath the 'personality conflict' - and uncover the beliefs and definitions these issues embody. These have been laid down over millennia and have to be undone step by step. Perfect solutions allow no step to be taken, but one good step leads to another and perspectives shift. If God were a static perfection - there would be no unfolding or evolving of conciousness as to its true nature. True transcendence embraces all apparently opposing polarities, accepting that which is resonant to a true sense of one's own being without having to justify that by invalidating others.

It is not the words that make the man or woman - but the deeds that communicate the presence - or indeed the lack of Soul.
Words and concepts are currencies that can become adulterated through misuse and false worship - for they are not the thing they point to. They can conceal toxic debt in complex instruments of persuasion. Finding a true currency of exchange, communication and relationship has to start from the extension of true presence - which is naturally receptive and discerning of the willingness in the other - such as is present to join with in mutually honouring terms or strengthen by not joining in false currency. Trust has to be grown in a mutual honouring. Power can only 'trust' conditioned obedience.

Paranoia and fear does not allow inner receptivity for fear paints reality in sharp contrasts according to the fragment of Self each is identified with protecting and this polarizing of conflicted identity is an open invitation to a shadow third party manipulation and dominance.

The narrative reality is not truth, but the stories we tell that either align true, or mis-alignment we think we want more than truth - and so believe at expense of knowing and feeling within. Truth is not determined by thinking, but its recognition inspires thought and action of alignment - as we freely accept.

But what I feel and know within is not for me to ascribe and assert true of anyone else - though I can meet others of a like willingness. But - for the sake of making a point - if I should seem to conform others to believe the same it will also be they who manipulate me so that they do not have to awaken responsibility of thought - for this is where power is given so as to use others to get it back-handedly. There is always a pay-off for whatever we believe - even unconsciously - or it would not be running. But closer re-evaluation will find much that we took to be true is not - and much of what we took to be symptom of disease or disorder is a true messenger unrecognized. If we assert our own identity, we deny and deprive the joy of being identified in love - be that in any of the innate or true qualities of Life. Asserted 'love' in the form of learned behaviours can only mimic and mask towards gaining acceptance.

What do we really feel about our thought? This may be too simple to ask - but if we feel fear in the fruits - then there is fear in the roots. I see Humanity as a great diversity of experience and perspectives that hold potential for war of conflicted 'power' or for sharing power in which war is not waged against the living - so much as embodying a unifying willingness for Life; giving as we in truth would receive - rather than as un-checked thinking would react.

"What do I really think"? Well in time, every kind of thought has some representation - but that does not mean they gain acceptance as that from which I live, or keep it if they teach me to choose better. That is the choice by which I align with unified purpose in Life. Our fruits communicate regardless the forms may deceive. If 'Caesar' insists on controlling the narrative - then of course 'Caesar' is given his due. But giving unto God that which is due means honouring Creation - Life - and discerning it beneath the distortions of personal and cultural masking. These words don't have to be your words for your feeling of the meaning to be true of you. Life is not forced on us against our true will - though is certainly seems to be when we have conflicted purpose within it. Life is a gift only recognized in giving likewise - not because you should... or Else! But because you are truly moved to freely accept - perhaps after learning what does not work!

The idea of making thought conform usurps love's function of freely choosing to cooperate and share in a greater sense of joining. We all have our 'reasons' as to why we withhold our blessing or withdraw our presence - and this thinking runs mostly un-checked. Does fear in fact protect us from loss, harm or corruption, or does it blind us to guidance in Life that helps to heal these deeply imprinted ways of thinking and seeing? When the baby is thrown out with the bath water there is no real attending to the living. Ideas are easy to play in - but consequences can be very painful and all idea accepted and lived as true desire - has consequence. This is not incentive and threat. Sowing and reaping is in every choice we make and every thought we accept by living as if it is true.

A commenter said: Who cares what Muslims think.

Once you can judge what others think, you can invalidate them. Once they are defined thus they can be forced to 'correct' or forcibly treated by a self-righteous duty! 

Because you 'care' to judge a category used to identify a group of diverse people, you embody such exclusivity or 'elitism'. If you had said 'who cares what anyone thinks' you may have uttered something wise.

I care that you know you have a choice as to where you get your thinking from. When everyone aligns with elitism, power trickles up to evaporate. The loss of consciousness on Earth is disguised by clever thinking - as is the usurpation and evaporation of wealth.

Global and personal directed narrative

I wrote this into Jon Rappoport's ongoing exposure of fraud relating to the manufactured zika virus hysteria.



- - -

What is noticeable in directed narrative inceptions, once one pauses to discern beneath the impressionism, is the delivery of emotionally triggering payload via false associations in a form of plausible deniability.

The apparent issue - ie: "outbreak of microcephaly due to zika virus" can be simply refuted by revealing published data that refutes the assertion. But evidently no one in the mainstream media engages in such a relational conversation, they merely persist in asserting it with more asserted association - whether climate change and zika, Catholic contraception and zika associations. So all sorts of 'connecting and supporting narratives are built on the first lie - and with such widespread exposure and persistence as to subliminally incept it as the dominant narrative - without any real relationship or communication taking place - apart from people extending a receptivity of passive compliance of unquestioned belief.

Underneath the behaviour is motive. What is or are the intended outcomes of such a globally pushed narrative device? There are many that can be proposed but the global nature of compliance in propagating and supporting it - and of not challenging its veracity or addressing the hysteria soberly, all call it out as a symptom of globalist capture or subversion of both our minds and our institutions - but particularly the Media - which could give voice to a greater perspective but does not.

The globalist movement - for want of better words, is a carefully laid trap over many generations.
The intent and effect is far more more insidious than merely being governed by a different set of 'leaders' or 'lords', for the ruling of the mind - and the conforming it to a basis of loveless disregard for Humanity that effects hatred of all that loves truth and is truly loving - so as to remake Life on Earth in its own image. The external personification and embodiment of this seems overwhelming and its power seems to be a powerlessness of Life itself - at least - as we have defined our life to be.

But the inner reality I see, is of a denied and raging hatred - that is firstly, self-hatred, rage, terror, grief, impotence, and the mess of all that is denied acceptance to our conscious awareness and pushed down, out in, the act of splitting a part of our thought and focus, as if to escape our sense of fundamental self-conflict. This splitting off can ONLY seem to maintain itself within a directed coercive narrative, because truth is FEARED and love seems weak and undermining to the directive for survival at all costs. And the fragmented consciousness (which continues to fragment from denied self as its way of saving itself), assumes any forms of shifting alliance to mask in and reinforce mask upon. The complexity and speed and nature of the defence against truth is of a divine intelligence serving a fear and rage agenda. If I try to describe this I merely embody confusion.

However as I notice a falsity or dissonance-avoidance dressed in false narrative, and choose not to accept and propagate a dis-integrity of being, but open instead in a willing desire for truth that has to then look at and feel the denied self - be that whatever sense of pain, disgust or negatively conditioning sense of being denied - there is a shift of perspective. The symptoms no longer define a state of disconnect from Life. This is of immediate practical significance. This is opening to a re-integrative or healing movement of tangibly felt Life - not a good cop in hidden relation to a bad cop - or some symbol of Life that is used as a shield or weapon in righteous  and blind hate.

The capacity to feel all of what we are feeling is part of reclaiming all that we are. Not in order to spiritualize or evolve our capacity of control through denial, conflict and withholding - but simply to recognize and share in the presence of Life - as it moves us and we uncover ourselves to be.

We can choose to be a witness for truth and to see the witnesses to truth - (or indeed to love, because a love of truth cannot love to fixate on the hated - but must enquire more deeply as to "what is really going on here' where something so hateful to me is presenting itself" - and 'what is my right relation or true response here?'). Acting from a connected presence is not reacting the same old conditioning in the same old re-enactment. We escape the past by bringing it truly into the present as discerning presence, rather than by letting it impose a false or fear-driven narrative on the present so as to deny and sacrifice Our presence for the 'survival' of a sense of power or control over the future. This is a mind-trap and yet one will not see it while one is firmly identified in its seeming protection. "Better the devil you know!"....? As long as one has any remaining conscious awareness of what is here to choose between, one has the capacity to choose to see that choice more honestly - whenever a dissonant outcome reveals a misalignment of definition.





note: Why use CAP Z for zika? Is it a symptom of a subconsciously conditioned Importance?

Migration as a weapon of war

Migration as a weapon of war: 'Ethno-engineering' used by the elites to manipulate the masses


I feel to write to other commentators as well as the article linked above. I start off writing about a pervasive mindset that has extreme example in the geopolitical manipulations of 'power elites' - but is generally invisible in the population at large. I feel that because we do not own and heal our own errors, we remain subject to and indeed unknowingly empower such negative agenda.

...

The negatively defined consciousness effectively weaponizes and marketizes everything - because its underlying or primary identity is in survive and prevail. That there are times when this is appropriate is not in question - or else we would never have established the basis through which to experience and explore such a continuous balance of focus within a very deep rabbit hole of complexity. However to be traumatically conditioned leads to becoming locked in such a 'reptilian' or primitive brain response as if it is the only allowable identification and hence usurps our true creative fluidity of being for an imprinted dictate. This is the loss of free willingness to the idea of free will in terms of oppositional power - which of course is never total - though it may seek to become so.

Conspiracy of breathing together in secret is a shared purpose of hidden agenda and requires no actual intimacy of communication - indeed it requires there NOT be such intimacy by joining in hate. The assertion of a private 'free will' upon true consciousness demands the sacrifice of wholeness - and this is a hate agenda that most all humanity 'conspires to uphold' believing it saves them from total sacrifice. However, this is very deeply hidden from exposure beneath many and complex defences that protect the sense of power or control over life from exposure - and the re-experiencing of the powerlessness, terror, rage, shame or self-conflicted hatred that called the 'power' forth by the desire to assert a unity upon perceived chaos. We have all invested heavily in the mask and perhaps are so identified in it that we do not even recognize it is a mask - indeed a story proceeding from a sense of threat within our own consciousness that reflects  - and then seems to be caused by its reflected experience. Indeed the attempt to 'survive' or persist the separate sense of personal will-assertion WANTS the external 'cause' as a displacement for its own undercover activity.

In reversing the reversal of consciousness, one has to start with exactly where we are at - and so one has to use the world experience for a different purpose than that of asserting a fear-agenda - if only in willingness to pause and uncover or be found ina greater and more aligned perspective by which to be able to accept and function in our living which is now within a larger context than an isolation seeking power, or an illegitimacy seeking validity. Until this perspective awakens responsibility of and as consciousness, the situation will be painted in a drama of personae in which one plays the central character - with allies and adversaries - but never direct and real intimacy of being - for that always undermines the capacity to WANT such an identity/world.

The globalist consolidation of power-in-the-world is operating a war upon or denial of true Consciousness - by usurping it with a false but forcefully backed intensity of scripted narrative 'reality'. Despite attempts to exist or operate within the identity afforded by power-in-the-world, its price or cost is increasingly becoming obvious as total. The residual desire to embrace and  share life NEEDS its survival chakra to open by truly opening to feel and vibrationally accept that it is feeling rather than demonize and deny aspects of self that are unrecognized as aspects of self. Only the willingness of true acceptance can undo the charge of rejection and denial that polarizes the self-negative into forms of spiritual or mental elitism over the discarded and diminished aspects of feeling, sensing and true balance of a wholeness of being.

The breaking down of presumed reality is unfolding now at an accelerating rate - which persona will see as being overwhelmed by adversity and adversary - which IS re-enacting its original imprinting. This is the point where we either go deeper into denial of what we are choosing to participate in - or stir in a willingness that no longer consents to hide or be kept hidden from its 'negative' feelings  and all that these represent - nor from an intimate and directly tangible presence of joy - unalloyed by manufactured personal filters and distortions of 'self' justification.

The resort to the control mind is always to the 'database' of past experience, by which to re-assert the self-same posture of refusal to intimacy of genuine communication - that includes the backlog of unhealed fear, guilt and rage but does not conclude there.
The opening or yielding in curiosity and willingness to a greater perspective within connected presence has to listen, feel and discern both within itself and within its perceived communication - and this is not within the capability of 'control mind'.

So freaking out in one way or degree or another and resorting to all kinds of mental strategies is simply part of the territory of the class we are in - or you would not be reading this far!
It is a completely different foundation to live FROM, that is being called forth and cannot be made into a movement because it already IS the movement of our true desire.
It will seem paradoxical to thought but we can only accept healing for ourself, but that our world and our fellow humanity reflect and reveal and call forth that in ourselves which otherwise we could not  access - and without which we 'know not what we do'.

So yes there are political and social relationships to engage in honourably as we are truly moved rather than guilted or manipulated to assert and contest, but these are always in the context of who we  - who I  - truly feel and know myself to be. Why use the word 'truly' here? - because the false is so habitually and pervasively imprinted to subconscious and unconscious habits or conditionings. It is also easily triggered by unexpected or manipulated events or intent.

So use what seems to be to serve the uncovering of what is - as a felt recognition. Or clingon as an identity of a disconnecting mentality that actively avoids relationship by mimicking its forms unfeeling and mimicking feeling with fake emotionality.
Is that a choice? I feel it is a choice - but in its obvious nature there is no choice but embracing Life. Denial is not so much a free will choice as an idea of denying free will given great force of desire and identity. Well it worked, didn't it!
If you have your answer but forgot the question, you will not recognize your fulfilment. However true fulfilment Knows itself Fulfilled - so there is the natural call to recognize what we are asking for that brings such dissonance to our focus of experience.

Media Integrity

A Guardian article on Trump, media power and social networking


My comment:


The term mainstream media is increasingly used to lump all of it together regardless its token 'regionalism' in terms of political or populist flavours. This because 'power agenda' rather than real relationship is becoming increasingly apparent. Honesty, integrity and honour are foundation without which lies become accepted currency and blame the method of self-righteous assertion.

Controlling the narrative is a power agenda. That various factions contest this may actually indicate power struggle within the elitists but more often is a screen reality by which to divide and rule unseen while diverting attention to proxy diversions.

Speaking truth to power is something a journalist could aspire to - for otherwise he or she becomes the controlled asset that is trained and relied upon to know where the line is and to keep their career. It is very complex because our consciousness is very complex - but the simplicity is that where there is no thirst for truth, lies will be suckled that prop up self-illusion, and where there is thirst for truth - Life will be invoked and manifested that does not share in that self-illusion - and it will come through all sorts of unexpected agencies or channels of synchronicities that do not pigeon-hole into the compartmentalised mind that is conformed to a power agenda rather than a real relationship.

Instead of filtering Trump - or any other phenomena of our times - into the establishment narrative - why not see the cultural currents that are embodying there? For it is the thirst that draws the embodiment - not an individual  acting powerful - and yet that thirst can also be distorted and filtered by what it judges against , rather than reading energetically.

The denial of the movement of Life is always the demonizing that generates the demonic reflected reaction - and that then sabotages and undermines what we thought to keep for ourselves. Yes there are particles or particular instances - but look at the wave. Or carry on playing out the good v evil narrative that serves to dictate power by invalidating and yes- hating others.

Selling totalitarianism

One among many articles on the EU masquerade being played out to ensure there will not be a Brexit?

While the Conservative party is associated with big business, it is also associated with sovereignty - if biased heavily towards the owners and executives of such business. But the shifting of power to a globalist corporate transnational power elite operating through a technocratic unrepresentative and unaccountable form of collectivism is big business without conserving anything excepting power for an increasingly few.

The EU is not a federation of indvidualities finding areas of common wealth but a subordination of true individual liberty to shadow power's dictate - as is exemplified by such 'trade' deals being pushed through without due process that would legally shift power from national governance to corporate entities and offshore courts.

That such a form of governance could even be countenanced is due to very clever insinuations of fear-thinking along with instruments of obfuscation that only financial marketeers can match. There may be an opportunity for a true accounting to be made if we pull out of the EU - from which a clearer sense of who we are and what we desire in life might regenerate a true culture of inspiration and purpose in place of the dictate of corporately managed alienation from our true being in a false dependency on increasing control over every aspect of our lives.

Yes to constructive relationship with others and to establishing trust and mutual benefit. No to coercion and deceit masquerading as official narratives of a ruling elite.

I see the primary human failing as that of seeing the form without discerning the intent. The form of global or European unity is not the issue for me. It is the underlying intent that is masked beneath such structures that is NOT aligned with or supportive of truly human consciousness or culture. Rather it embodies  a monocultural state by which populations are farmed and managed by a Soul-less technocracy behind which are power-elites who use the law as a weapon and shield against Life Happening. Life is not the danger. Power elitism is the danger. Merely subordinating power in massive state consolidation - whilst revolving doors subvert regulatory protection to create cartels - is not security - but the utter suppression of the symptoms of Life to conformity of a tyrannous will - no matter how it presents itself.