Friday, 25 October 2013

The exposure of a secret intent to a shared attention

NSA monitored calls of 35 world leaders

This breaking of a such secrecy is not merely 'out there' but is reflective of a shift 'in here'.

Privacy, properly speaking, is given and received as a matter of honour - but secrecy is the concealment of what is without honour.

The concealment of dishonouring intent has been 'legitimised' by the pseudoscientific thinking that projects its own limited consciousness onto its interpretations of such data as genetics - as if 'survival of the fittest' has nothing to do with fitting into a living environment and everything to do with an urge to prevail over and control everything.

Our actions reflect our beliefs and our beliefs arise from the way we define ourselves and our world.

The more we try to control, the more out of control it gets and the more we divert of our energy and attention in ever greater sacrifice in order to maintain such illusion of control.
When the price outweighs a never arriving goal, a shift occurs.

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Faction versus fiction is a tweedledumdrum

Pseudoscience deals in a world of facts. There is a sense of solidity and dependability and security in facts. You know who you are in a world of facts!

But the nature of existence is not schematized into a tidy construct of facts. It is a vortex of flux - and it is being you no less than all else.

The attempt to take the personal consciousness out from reality, so as to have the facts without the fiction, underlies such pseudoscience as to render it meaningless, because Consciousness Itself is the Always Fact to every instant of anything defined, apprehended, measured or evaluated. It is not only the 'elephant in the room' it IS the room - and the game of pretending it only has subjective existence as given it by the facts that are determined about the room.

Is this or that healthy or unhealthy? It depends.
The context in which something arises is part and parcel of its arising and THAT is what it depends on.

There is no one-size-fits-all reality. The faction versus fiction is a tweedledundrum. The multidimensional nature of reality is not coercive upon us - but if we do not align with our true calling or joy in life we will betray ourselves to a sense of deprivation and conflict - some of which will manifest in some of us as health issues, relational, financial, or as dysfunction and mis-alignment and thus breakdown of communication and trust in every arena of living.

The 'patient' is not served by compounding his or her self-convictions, but by sharing a compassionate presence in which choices that are actively dis-integrative to wellbeing can be owned and changed.

The pseudoscientifically constrained are noticably hateful of anything that reeks of love - and which must be heretical and which, above all else, is it their mission, their duty and their vindication to destroy.

You see, the pseudoscientifically disposed, have a problem with love that is nothing to do with science - which seeks to uncover truth - and everything to do with hidden self-agendas that are tacitly reinforced by using scientific method in such a way as to only seek and find the validations of their own presumptions. Namely, that reality is a material physical phenomena in which consciousness is an anomaly of chemicals and electricity, albeit a brief moment in which by some anomaly, life is aware of itself.

What we call consciousness is in some sense a mastery of limitation whereby conditions seem to 'matter' and our state of being is mere effect. This is a reversal. Your state of being is what materializes your selection of reality as your experience regardless of the circumstance.

"Take up thy bed and walk!" is symbolic to the recognition of your existence, from the perspective of existence - free of the definition whereby you identified with the changing, as if it were fixed, or fixable.

Heal Thy Self - healthy self

Eat butter and cheese not low-fat spreads, says heart specialist

Aseem Malhotra says saturated fat is not a problem, low-fat products are often full of sugar and statins are over-prescribed

The medical racket is a kind of 'insider dealing' for there are private agendas of self interest that work against the well being of the whole.
The scope and scale of it is unimaginable to the ordinary hobbit that lives in its Shire and knows little and cares less to know more.

But what is underneath even the tacit conspiracies of profiteering and manipulating the perceptions and beliefs of others who 'give their power away' in the belief it makes them free or safe, are personal and cultural definitions of self, other and world which bind us into negative self belief. Vicious circles of self harm that seem to be caused and justified by external or past conditions. Yet such causation is attempt to displace a sense of 'something fundamentally wrong with oneself. Something invalid, lacking, worthless, inadequate, or even hateful and toxic.

The dissonance of being out of alignment with our being is not a surface condition that can be manipulated away - and yet every kind of such attempt is invested in and then we become hostage to our investments.

Some recognition of what I offer can resonate with a realisation that responsibility; 1. Is not blame in any way shape or form. 2. Is inescapable. 3. Is the ability to respond rather than react - and is therefore innate to our foundation as conscious existence.

In order to respond, one has to first be receptive - which is undefended - to What Is - without first judging or interpreting into terms that express and protect a negatively defined sense of self. This calls for a focus of honesty, willingness and curiosity amidst the enactment of hitherto unconscious choices and is not compatible with laziness of mind that masks and normalized being so much less than you are in some misplaced identity in reaction.

But it is simply true that to value yourself by acting out from your highest sense of your joy, your passion - with integrity - radiates health.

In the process 'toxic sludge' or negative belief and emotion, will be loosened from its unconsciousness to be released, lived through, integrated and transformed. Everyone has their own unique versions of whatever 'conditions' arise as everyone has their unique viewpoint within existence. Attempts to externalize and rationalize existence at the expense of owning and integrating our own experience, are simply 'running away from Life'. But 'wherever you go, there you are!' Existence does not go out of existence. But the forms of its reflection are ever changing.

One cannot 'save' oneself from transformational change but by wholeheartedly embracing 'What Is', one can share the changeless; That you Are, and existence Is - and always now. That what we put out, we get back. Radiating presence is not something we 'do' so much as something Life naturally Is - when we do not block or withhold our nature in guilt and fear. Living out from fear makes a currency of miser-y and deprivation.

No one else can choose for you. Nor can we choose for another. But in living our choice we resonate with others who are also waking up. The 'crazy' ones are in fact opening to sanity, and the breakdown of the structure of control is a symptom of rising health - the instant we accept ourselves guiltless.

It  may seem that the 'bad guys' have the power to control and manipulate all things to be subject to their own terms of 'solution'. But this is only in tandem with a demand for unconsciousness in the terms the mass of individuals give value to.

A managed, processed existence within which a 'virtual world' plays out in a surface life that does not really wake to know and share the love and beauty and wonder of existence - as a participance in which we are transformed by the renewing of our perspective.

One does not have to 'fight' what one has not chosen to validate in one's own belief and desire. But one does have to be living on purpose to maintain a focus in what we do value rather than become sidetracked into focussing on what we do not want.
'Dont look where you do not want to go!. If we choose to re enact old choices then recognizing that opens the way to choose with what we truly are. For we already are worthy of existence or we would not Be.

additional comment:

This song came to mind regarding the attempts to manually manipulate life so as to become a slave and then a victim to a manually manipulated life. Children's wisdom is too deep for the learned.
Here is a longish article that takes a slice through history of medical consciousness on Earth. It is grim reading. It doesn't have to be wholly true to offer a perspective on human consciousness that we do not like to own.
That interventions can be helpful is not worth arguing, but surely it is obvious that the 'life-style' that corporate technology seeks to protect and maintain past its sell-by date is not merely external factors of diet and exercise - but inner causative aspects of self definition…from which all else proceeds in an infinite expression of variety.
"Go forth and multiply" applies to conception; idea. There isn't any choice in the nature of what Mind is - but only how we use it and what we use it for.
Look at what we use it for - without moral judgement - and find out what we actually are choosing - then ask what would we have to believe true to want to choose thus? And the limiting or negative beliefs and definitions will be revealed. For we ALL automatically choose toward pleasure and against pain - as we define it!
Free will means we can choose even to believe we do not have a choice, but it also means we still have free will regardless of what we currently choose to believe.
What we choose to define and accept as our self will 'go forth' in intention and desire - and deservability, and will be acted out from unquestioned. That is - until our feedback experience of our world causes a pause in which to re evaluate the basis of our choosing.

Monday, 21 October 2013

Charity begins at home - naked truth

Warwick women rowers strip off for charity. But is that okay?

What does 'exploited' mean?

Are the women exploiting the known trigger points of cultural ideas of attractiveness in order to sell more calendars and attract more money to an un-unrelated (to naked women) charity?
Is not the idea of 'raising money for charity' a device that is exploited for its own reasons?
Perhaps the term exploited is more associated with coercive force, or of being manipulated such as to be unaware of the choices one is taking or of other choices available.
Exploiting is an aspect of 'getting'. One might say we all exploit ourselves, each other and our world, in that we will all seek to get something for ourselves - unless we are already happy, whole and connected, in which case we share rather than 'get'.

A key issue is whether we receive and give in a sense of honour and trust, rather than 'get' at another's expense without any real relation.
But the key issue to the women's project might be 'how do we raise money for xyz?' - and feel for their comfort zones and sense of adventure both. Because 'charity' is the remaining avenue of 'justification' for behaviours outside social conformity.

The 'getting' mode, is seemingly innocuous and harmless - but it cannot be employed without a psycho-emotional disconnect, and the 'justification' mentality rises as one with it - as is symbolized by fig leaves in the myth of the Fall.

"Ye have not because ye ask not" - is a reference to a direct self revealing extension of trust and communication. A true intimacy shared. We sacrifice the power of love in a darkness of forgetting, in order to 'enjoy' the private sense of power in 'getting' - except we then suffer experience of being 'gotten from' and loss and fear of loss replaces trust, and a mask replaces our true presence, in which praise and blame war - so as to deny a clear and heartfelt acceptance of our naked living being.

Moral coercion feeds a libertarian reaction. Guilt is the driving force of morality - for the innocence of our being does not seek to justify or validate itself. But nor is it defined in reaction against such cultural impositions.

To do something because it is the true desire and movement of our being, does not bring with it the associated overhead of conflicted self - or its reflection as a conflicted experience of our world.

This is true charity - because this is the gift of our true presence into our relations. When our presence is witheld we deprive ourselves and others - and yet look out as if it is denied us by others and our world.

Charity begins at home. If we do not truly let love into our lives - we will not have it and be it in our relations. A deep self acceptance is not a justification slip for doing what you do not really want! This issue is the most important in all else that ever occurs because it is foundation for what comes next. Self-rejection - no matter how disguised - will not bring a better world for 'others' or ourselves. Love knows what thinking alone can only hide.

Controversy is a sport. But one doesn't have to play it.

Sunday, 20 October 2013


Tesco's Secret Weapon In The Christmas Android Tablet Wars

Tesco look to dominate a tablet 'Christmas'. Hudl up around a fake tree and get some entrancing sweeties. Not that the device itself has any major drawback - but the models that are driving the market are the effects of a consciousness of our time.

Yes, Microsoft demonstrated the power of marketing Windows. Apple redefined it in their comeback as a cool device/ecosystem/identity. Now almost everyone is offering ‘Apple’ presentations and displays as their own grab at mindshare.
Mindgrabbing is the name of the game in an emergent informational proprietary.
Who controls or owns the mind owns the game…
But I feel this new (dark?) age of management, manipulation and milking all things for simply more wealth and dominance will be a surprisingly short one.
meanwhile the dealers are giving out sweets and cheap highs – and it is an exciting time to be alive amidst what would a while ago have seemed magical powers – as long as your device is charged, connected and not hijacked or hacked by terrorist states or criminal corporate interests or teenagers with identity issues.

The shift of power

Energy price hikes 'inexplicable'. The Archbishop of Canterbury has slammed the recent energy price rises saying that they look "inexplicable."

Companies are not reckoned by law to have moral obligation and exist not as personal entities but as systems of making profit. The idea of market forces achieving balance falls apart in any monopolistic dependency and is only a small facet of a complex system that has largely developed from manipulative thinking rather than of serving the whole.

Blame and shame is part of the mentality of manipulative thinking - and if a large enough emotional reaction were generated, companies might indeed be influenced and also new legislation made law - but trying to balance off separate and conflicting interests is no way to 'balance' because it is being applied to, or imposed upon the system by force.

For every action there is an opposing reaction. But the action within the wholeness is called a 'shift' because it is an awakening from an expression of false premise and undesirable outcome, to a unified expression of willingness and intelligence.

How we organize our society is not dictated by those who fear to lose their apparent wealth and power over others, it is dictated by how we think!

Now thinking is made out to be an ineffectual wishful thing - not unlike imagination. With no power to effect change - unless one is ingeniously capable of devising complex financial instruments for the financiers of such manipulative intent, or any other specific intent to manipulate via the interference in discovered mechanisms of causation.

But 'as a man thinketh in his heart - so does he perceive' is no less true now that ever - for the unified power of thought and true feeling is the basis of all experience of existence.
"How will that keep you warm?". Well for a start it will shift you from a self protective dumb-terminal, easily managed and manipulated, to a greater awareness of what and who you really are - with everyone and everything, rather than apart from it.

We can often come to recognize and appreciate what resonates true, by first opening an experience of what is not. Think 'true' here not in lofty definitions but in terms of truly worthy of wholehearted commitment, appreciation and gratitude.

The 'church' has lost its voice if it speaks from within the cage that modern thinking has 'put it in'. Perhaps I could have said 'within the prodigal trough!' - not in blame - but in recognition that there is always a payoff for our choices - regardless of how hidden or disguised they are as our apparently but not very conscious agreements.

Fearful insecurity and rapacious racketeering go hand in hand. The answer is not war on evil (sigh) but a profound commitment to an honest self accounting. Call out the behaviour by all means - but in a way that elicits an opportunity to shift.

"Shift Happens!"

Will machines ever be able to think?

Will machines ever be able to think?

This BBC article promoted a brief consideration of Consciousness and 'machinery'.

If you can accept that Consciousness in its raw or native sense is all pervading energy that informs and communicates or harmonizes itself in all that it expresses as manifest and self-aware reality - then what we call consciousness is already in a sense an instrument or machine in which a 'portion' of a greater 'mind' explores its creative expression. To mimic the programs of our lower mind will not really make 'alive' but if we give our consciousness to them - they will be an outsource of our own. To let the Living be self-aware through 'machinery' requires all of the elements of consciousness to be received and communicated. That is both Feeling and Thought. The Feeling or intuitional knowing is not emotions, which are merely thoughts that limit or distort the Feeling dimension. Our current 'split off mentality' from Feeling tends to seek to replace Life with a model of mimicry (and gimmickry!) and of manual usurpations and interventions. Because the Feeling Consciousness is 'upstream or beyond the focus of a conceptual focus, it cannot be witnessed or demonstrated within the terms of a physically focussed consciousness - excepting to note the difference in the quality and reflection of one's own consciousness experience and relations.

The question 'Why?' is meaningless at the level of the meaning of existence - but is absolutely pertinent to the level of consciousness expression because to go forth and multiply what one does not love, enjoy, or appreciate truly... is to create a world of deprivation, isolation and conflict - as can be readily observed.
So the primary basis of foundation of choice or decision is not the responsibility of programmed thinking!