Friday, 22 April 2016

The Collective Experiment is Earth



The Collective Experiment on Earth

#1 Overlooking Individual Experience within a limited concept of individuality:

"The individual has been overlooked".

This is only believable and experience-able within a collectivist redefinition of individuality.

Individuality is not a body OR a mind OR feelings - but the balanced embrace AND transcendence of an Indivisibility.

Running a COPY in concept-mind opens to the warring of conflicting concepts in division - and all the experience of such a focus with limiting definition. But a definition is never the Thing Itself - which remains indivisible - regardless the or perspective that any definition opens as experience.

All thinking is in the terms and the nature of its foundation. We seem to have two foundations competing: one is self-concept and the other is a prior quality or integrity of being that operates the reintegration of self identification within concept to an expansion of Re-Cognition and Re-membering. Looking for this in the 'world' is reinforcing the belief it is not already true of You.

Getting your head around this is the wrong direction excepting to realize the call to deeply and truly release the attempt to get ahead of yourself - which is the belief or fear in a sense of lack or loss or a missed appointment.

What is the 'problem' is a unique opportunity for me to recognize something in myself that is out of true in my beliefs about my self, my mind, my world?

When painted into a corner, the only direction left is Consciousness itself. Not in concept - but energetically - for we are already being 'lived and breathed' not by 'Other' but by an Individuality that has been overlooked, redefined, ad actively denied - and even 'crucified' - that is - reviled and hated and 'killed'.

Symbol is a living focusing Idea, but once idolized in place of the Living, degenerates to concept. "Concept Floors Carpets and Blinds" as a shop sign in my locality announces. But that is not a call for anti concept - but for a shift upstream to a Living Perspective. Capital letters - like any other conceptual language can only 'point' to what is currently being overlooked - until the distractive fascination fades to allow awareness to rise to consciousness - though really it is the other way around.

Is the whole 'matrix-illusion' idea just another clever way to stay focused in struggle so as to keep the 'warrior' in righteous self-employ? Yes and No. Because it is always our choice as to what purpose we use anything for - and while we focus on what everyone ELSE is thinking or doing - we overlook our Individuality. But we have not 'left or lost' it - we are choosing to focus in and act out from an idea in which lack and loss are inherent.

When something communicates this sense of lack and division, there is always something needy, coercive and artfully contrived to persuade or appeal. One does not need a process in logic once one is aligned in wholeness - but the mimicry of the self-in-concept can seem to be unquestionably right when it is mistaken. Better to know the full feeling of relaxed and open communication that tells you you are truly present than ideas of right and wrong. What is true for us in any given moment is the discernment of an outcome of a balanced appreciation. Inner undefendedness in honesty of being automatically aligns what is needed in imagination, synchronicity and feedback as an unfolding communication of Individualty within Wholeness. For the One is in All as All are in One. Self-specialness is no less so in negative terms - and always segregates the self-sense from the Relational Richness of the Whole.

I only meant to add the first paras - but my interest and aliveness in such consideration is where I find a 're-cognition and re-membering' that transfers to washing dishes and perhaps more deeply - embracing the 'negative' states within a truly felt willingness - without coercion that insists or demands they change - in order to find validation or validate my world-view. I feel this to be an active release of self-judged invalidity - regardless of its social or collective reinforcements.

Truth rises of itself unless something else is actively pushing it down - including the clever attempt to 'fight its cause'.

#2 Reclaiming Sovereignty of free willingness:

Perhaps... you are painted into a corner because you don't yet see you are in the version of Earth that corresponds exactly to the vibrational frequency of your thought - and that Infinity includes all versions or parallel realities of everything imaginable - but that your unique 'experiment/exploratory themes' will always align you in those that serve the purpose you are currently being served in.
What is the purpose that aligns your thought and desire? Is it truly aligned with who you feel and know yourself to be? Or is it conflicted and self-limiting and dense in its openness to communication and therefore heavy and dark? Look to your world and to your feeling for your brother and know by your fruits what you are holding within your current definitions or it could not manifest in and as your experience. No blame here - simply idea out of true with who you prefer to be. So instead of wresting, struggling and getting frustrated with the reflection. Use it to correct your own creative alignment with being - that you cannot help or stop being - however you use that creative capacity to seem to experience yourself and your world to be. It's up to you.

That what you desire - by focussing in and bringing forth - is the simple truth, can also be hidden in the usurping or distortion of desire with fears and judgements given energy and attention as if you desired them - whereby your active desire is mow masked by a surface persona that may be completely unaware of what you are actually calling forth, by virtue of identifying in thoughts that seem to hide or protect you from a feared consequence.

Reclaiming sovereignty of will - Free Willingness - will never come from coercion or deceit - no matter HOW justified you may feel. In fact coercion and deceit comes back at you without your recognition that it is your shouting into the cave that brings back this echo.

If you keep shouting - it is because it serves your current definition of yourself or you simply would not do it. Everything is serving us each -  and as the collective shared agreement - that each always has within the Idea of themselves. there is no separation - but within the exploration of the experience of separation hell operates the agreements of lovelessness in forms that prevent waking to the communication and meaning that is always shared through forms - not AS them.

The meaning you receive from anything is all the meaning you give to it. If you try to fake yourself - that meaning will adulterate and usurp your simple honesty of self-communication and in one way or another - the waking from the faking is the world I am living right now  - and sharing with the version of you that is in this 'reality' with me. For we all communicate through inner versions of everyone and everything. There is no outside - but there is the power and the intimacy of sharing - where the meeting of two or more opens a transcendent third.

The way out of the false matrix is to recognize you are not in it - and act from that knowing - and so grow that awareness rather than lose it to the 're-assertion' of habit. The 'real world' is thus harvested from the release of the false - and reflects what is true of you - no matter what anyone else thinks or does - unless they trigger your word or judgement on yourself. That's where the issue is. Not what 'they' say - not getting their say changed in any way.

I write this here because I feel you open the space in which it can be said and considered. Resonance with who you truly are is different from reinforcement of who you are struggling to be.

The Journey is the point of Life - that is living it wholly - which is not cramming or haste but having the time you need to be who you are. Of course there is challenge in meeting the negative aspects of our consciousness. Crisis is generally how humans access the willingness to change.
Someone said: "If it weren't for the last minute, nothing would get done" - however - it is both and individual and a collective or relational issue as to a sense of no where else to go or the ground disappearing from beneath one's feet or a total melt-down. Everyone has a pain threshhold at which they either change or refuse to play - but that pain is not inflicted by Life on the poor individual - although that is the human narrative that masks deeper correspondences than we generally allow.

Thursday, 21 April 2016

Unclear Nuclear



The Trillion Dollar Nuclear Weapons Fraud
Over the years, as we have helped debunk elite propaganda, from elaborate NASA hoaxes to vaccine cover-ups, it has occurred to us more and more strongly that something is wrong with at least parts of the “nuclear narrative.”

Here's an add to the mix: There are significant accounts of UFO activity around missile sites that have coincided with disabling missile launching capabilities.

In the principle of being free to unfold our own choices but not free to choose to significantly deny others their own capacity, Humanity is free to destroy itself within a range of probable futures - but not via means that is destructive to other 'civilisations' that are part of the larger collective of which we have effectively forgotten at the level of the filtered consciousness we take as our reality.

Of course the military personnel could be suffering hysterical delusions and the documentation falsified - but I have the sense that the power by which we are subjected is our own - but in ways we have given away under beliefs that are now invisible to us because they are called reality.

This comment prompted my further response

Whatever the veracity of any interpreted experience, which is ultimately between you and your true Source (and nothing really can come between unless you believe it and give it the power to do so), I see the increasing polarisation of the 'dark and light' and I mean that in terms of functional terms not value judgement.

I recall Seth talking of serving the transition of a militant Muslim as the scene and set by which to bring a unified recognition to one who was polarized in form. For the underlying recognition is the correction or transcendence of form-based meanings - whose apparent fixity is reflecting inner needs or indeed inner convictions of guilt threat and need for defence - yes being acted out as an experience in time and space.  Here we are - but where really is 'here'. Perhaps that is all I will say now but we are not really in any thing but we define it so and spontaneously remap to validate and reinforce what we have accepted and shared.

This forum being a 'news commentary' is predicated to focus on the 'negative agenda' which reinforces a belief in victim-hood and the struggle for power, concealment, subterfuge and deceit in which to abide until vengeance can come forth and abuse the abusers - or some other proxy scapegoat as if freedom waits on the world to re-align with the rules I gave it.


This Comment (Into comment conversation): by tom
"Don't believe anything. Regard things on a scale of probabilities. The things that seem most absurd, put under 'Low Probability', and the things that seem most plausible, you put under 'High Probability'. Never believe anything. Once you believe anything, you stop thinking about it". ~ Robert Anton Wilson

My response:
This is also saying truth is never in the model or in fact a conclusion or 'see' definition in fixed terms. Truth is in what purpose you use the model, or idea FOR.

Your purpose is either aligned with who and what you feel and know yourself to be - or not. It is popular to blame 'them' for deceiving 'us'. I suggest that there is a subscription of which we are not currently acknowledging. We do not recognize ourselves in the symptoms... as yet.

When reality deconstructs as a result of a fundamental and pervasive dis-integrity - aka insanity of dissociation that depends on deceit to persist - the conflicted nature of the mind; of its concept-perceptions, communications and acts becomes intolerable - although cooking the frog slowly can invite oblivion quite painlessly, once it is induced or forced into 'secure' confinement.

This is what 'mind' in the sense of persona was invoked to save us from - and yet the thing we thought to escape is in its very foundations and brings the fruit in accord with its roots no matter how well presented our personae might be.

There are many polarities of mind-strategy - such as more intensely 'controlling' (limiting) consciousness so as not to feel the pain. The principle limiter of consciousness is fragmentation, division, conflict, and a deadening off of receptors to communication where such channels have been traumatized or burned or hollowed out from experience of denial, of treachery, betrayal, abuse and abandonment. The element of running away from our self is witnessed by restless thought, emotion or activity that has to maintain diversion from a lack of presence appreciation - indeed from a force of negative self-appreciation that will change your mind should you attempt to use your mind to 'see' why. It doesn't 'see' anything but its own model of presumed reality. One has to pause the mind to relax or shift to a perspective in which to notice the mind-in-act. All else is conditioned 'reality'.

The reversal set the outer symptoms or form reflections of inner definition as the causes - while therefore denying the Causal aspect of Consciousness in which such definitions are thus effectively hidden and rendered 'unconscious' or indeed TABOO!

If you break primary taboo your tribe, group, family, society will disown, invalidate, curse and reject you. EVERYONE learns tacity what is not allowed because fear and guilt teach them.

The abandonment of reaction from any existing set of conditioned thinking  is a willingness to wake up from the dream of the independent persona with which you may be equating your self rather than accepting and embracing as part of you that serves the purpose you now give it. With this comes the willingness to feel the pain of the underlying conflict rather than re-brand the belief in symptom-suppression as the necessary context of survival. But feeling into it in the purpose and willingness of healing and awakening active responsibility for consciousness -  instead of 'limiting' control and outsourcing or deferring pain.

The mind of generally mutually agreed definitions we call the world or reality is not inherently fixed - because what mind is - is inherently open as a medium of communication. "Judge not lest ye be judged" because what you use your mind for becomes the measure of your experience of it. Such experience conditions the subconscious to 'fix' belief in reactive strategies driven by guilts and fears including the power of denial. As is evident minds can seriously engage in questioning whether they exist. The power of the mind is in ANY belief accepted and acted from as true or in place of true.

Actually once you believe something it becomes invisibly part of your thought - your world. The symptom of the articles and our age is one of reversal.

Belief is not appropriate to things but to purpose. When you uncover the true within you it is not embodied in thought or form - IT IS YOU. Your life gives it form by acceptance that extends as belief in yourself as currently recognized, accepted and appreciated.
It is not necessary to actively believe in truth to experience it directly - but it is necessary to pause or put aside - if only for a moment and belief that actively operates to deny it.

On the principle that it takes one to know one, the self-judging can only 'see' others in the same lens and under the same conviction. Using this we can use our perceptions to 'reverse engineer' awareness of the mind from out which we act as if our own - and in that recognition, release self and other from definitions that are realized unfitting untrue or counter to who you prefer to be. Once a habit of thought is uncovered, it becomes a choice.

Choosing has been falsely framed and sold as freedom when the range of choices makes no real difference because the real choice is framed out of the picture. This is where a denial consciousness has to open to recognize not merely its 'choice' but what it is choosing between. A real choice is between alternates that are tested for their nature and consequence and this means  a true accounting of each. It could be said that the principle of necessary evil is that of succumbing to the 'devil we know' of established and believed power, because we associate terror, pain and loss with the 'unknown'.

I suggest that it is what we have made of Life that terrifies us and not what it innately is. Of course we experience this under the narrative 'what life has made of us'. Victimhood is not what it seems and beneath the face of any who treasure it for what it gives them is rage quick to strike out in righteous hate if that face is in any way unveiled to its own participance.

Perhaps survival never was part of the 'plan' in terms of a multifaceted unfolding of rich experience - excepting as was necessary to gather and grow the consciousness that must now metamorphose - that is yield to change that it is not accountable for or in control of. When we recognize our life we have a basis for surfing or uncovering the balance points amidst whatever moves within and without. When we insist on some other assertive or imposed narrative - it simply cannot serve but to take us ever more out of communication. If loss of consciousness is your choice - then keep thinking that you are what you think you are, or the feeling of being will weaken your resolve with recognitions that weaken the tower at its very foundation.

Down the Rabbit Hole







Clearly we have been and are already powering our 'consciousness' and society from such a power source and the vanity and arrogance that thought it could contain and control it is operating as a denial overlay of controlled masking narrative. It has feasting on human beings, and our home planet -which had been quarantined as a result as both a strait jacket and in a 'prime directive' to see if we would be able to awaken out of such a 'back door' hack, or 'take ourself down' - but not in a way that would be allowed to operate a contagion of informational energetic to the larger community.
So by this black-hole power we generate the conviction and its reflected experience that we are alone - and of course secretly enamoured of the 'power' to lord it over Life - redefining everything in terms of our 'alone-ness' as a world of 'object' rather than as an appreciation of relational wholeness communicating in all its parts.
An inner shift in Humanity is synchronous with the re-opening of communion - for higher level communication communicates as Feeling and Imagination - for the communication vortices are no longer blocked from consciousness. Hence unfolding 'discovery'.


Adam: (to the main article)All this proves is that even so-called scientists indulge in fairy story fantasies. If Hawking believes that it is possible to "travel through a black hole" then I dare him and other "scientists" with such similar views to climb inside a washing machine and put it on full spin cycle and then state whether it is possible to go through black holes (assuming they survive the spin cycle). A black hole would be a billion times worse than the spin cycle and you would be ripped apart molecule by molecule, atom by atom and subatomic particle by subatomic particle.   Data may survive but humans won't. Hawking should know that, instead of pandering to this mythological nonsense. 

  
Me:
If scientists didn't access imagination, you would have NO science. You're obvious and visceral hatred of myth no doubt has mythic roots in you. Humans can determine - in the main - when things are to be taken literally - until of course they lock on to a literal belief in a model and worship and conform all things to their one true model - regardless what form it takes.
You believe that you know you are a body and that is your notion of 'humanity'. well and good if it serves you.

I have a perspective of 'through a body, rather than in it or AS it - though without a 'spacesuit' of body and personality construct, one cannot participate in the focus of an individual human experience. The quality of being - by whatever name - that moves beneath the structure of meanings experienced is non-local. We have trained a 'mind' not to look there - not least with separation trauma which was not so dissimilar to your washing machine metaphor. Nothing survives its moment.

NASA - No Alternative Scenario Allowed?





When one can feel one is being coercively manipulated and that a deceit runs behind it - the 'presentation of 'facts' or the dressing up in scientific clothing are secondary to the relationship. This is about power and politics of asserting and enforcing consensus without a free-willing communication - or coercion would not be 'required' or belonging. And it is just one example of you MUST do as we say or EVIL of one kind or another will befall you - but WORSE - YOU will be guilty of bringing it on everyone else by virtue of your lack of support or indeed interest.

I am not here to change anyone's mind - but witnessing to that you have one and that it is very liable to phishing attacks whereby your thinking - even your identity - is hacked. We either learn about deceits or suffer them.

Of course climate is changing - Everything is changing but the mindset locked into a paradigm of coercing and controlling Life. That isn't how Life works - that's how to kill it.

Breivik the monster



I couldn't get the site to accept the whole thing so I chopped off bits until something went in. This is the whole of what I wanted to post:



Firstly - all this attention and provocation is being consciously purveyed in mainstream media - so it is serving more than Breivik's agenda - whatever that might be.

Mob-Judging others as to what they "deserve" is an expression of out-sourced and un-owned self hatred - which is very difficult to feel and abide. Of course the LAST thing that features is anything to do with self - for hating the sin in the OTHER is the way to excommunicate any trace of it in ourselves. 

Vengeance and justice are antithetical to each other, or rather, when vengeance is equated with justice, hate is accepted and worshipped as power and true relational communication - and all that comes from it is denied. That is the undercurrent purpose of any act of terrorising; to reset and re-frame the narrative in ITS terms.

Note that self-righteous hate begets self-righteous hate... unless you choose not to be define in hate - but to re-assert a core integrity of humanity. 

Assessing what conditions are appropriate for the restraint and potential re-education or re-habilitation should not be sentimentally driven - either in hate or pity - but compassionately discerned within an honesty of being that hate denies and breaks in order to persist in our thinking.

To love yourself as your brother as the Source of Life is not intelligible to hate or to power derived from hate. Love is the quality of presence that is being with what is real in yourself, while being with who or what you are with - for these two are not strictly separable; you will interpret through your "self" however much seeming to justify judging another from a higher place.

Mirror images of extreme polarities are dividing us in ways that invoke hatred under guise of righteousness - including extreme 'centre' of anti-extremism.

But when triggered into hateful feelings we mostly have no awareness or willingness with which to consider any perspective but our conditioned reaction. And so whatever else is called for in practical terms, to use the negative experience to generate a positive or re-integrative outcome is to stay in true sovereignty of will and refuse the usurping deceit of hating to feel better about yourself.

Once a denial of humanity is established in one case, it will be expanded to other cases. Hence invalidating terms given currency, are then used to justify summary executions, invasions and subjugation of others in every aspect in which power is transferred from a process of true communication to the judgement of whoever has the biggest gun or control of those who have them - and that includes economic weapons.