The True Matrix of Life

https://viroliegy.com/2022/06/27/the-exosome-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3718

Clarifire:

On what the mainstream calls “exosomes,” I haven’t reached a final verdict but it certainly looks like they were just a rescue device for virology and I’m not motivated to prioritize looking more into the idea by anything I’ve seen so far.

This doesn’t mean I write off the concept of intercellular communication; in fact I rather suspect it happens abundantly.

The mainstream terminology is almost always really messed up. Are any of the things they call “exosomes” something worth studying? Maybe, but I bet if so a cleanup of the semantics is warranted, because it seems very likely that plenty of what they call “exosomes” are just dead cell debris, and as far as debunking virology that’s probably going to be the central point.

Yes.
I noticed two points that I reflect or expand on.
That 'cells' cooperate or share unifying functional attributes with a whole far in excess of a sum of seeming parts (that can be assigned or imagined  BY current theories of function), is "life, Jim, but not as we (think to) know it".
So communication is the true matrix of life (and physics) as synchrony of field effects, that express as energy exchange that includes chemical and kinetic elements.
An object model (rising from a self-imaged 'thing-ness' or separateness) taken out of its psychic and spiritual context, is the leaned capacity to perceive a world of broken relationship as the resource or indeed compulsion to 'put together again'.
If we march to the drum of All the king’s horses and all the king’s men, we will be out of synch with a prior or Given wholeness, but entrained to an off-centric or segregative attempt to maintain a split purpose, such as to generate protected dissonance as a tax or toxic burden to the individuation of the Infinite we call a life - yet is never really just a thing in and of itself.

So the other point that came up is of the term, 'just dead cell debris'.
The spotlight of our mind hides more that it reveals, so relative to what we give value and focus to the label may somewhat apply, but biology doesn't just recycle, but does so within a greater intelligence than a blind watchmaker, so that the nature of our current discards may hold more value as our understanding grows.
While my sense of DNA dogma/theory is unsettled, the term junk DNA was later recognized key to 'epigenetics'. I have a sense that bio-computing is vastly richer than binary, such as to be unhackable by its product. But we have always had a freedom to get in our own way AND to assign the dissonance away from a separated sense or rather concept of self.

While we (in my view) cannot edit or manipulate our true being, we can come into a resonant alignment or coherence to a wholeness that heals, but never a thing alone, because there never was such a thing so much as a contract to reaction.

The Ego in the Science

The Ego in the Science

 

in response to the themes in RobRob:

http://viroliegy.com/2022/06/27/the-exosome-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3687

Also, off topic but why do Kaufman and Cowan believe in the structured water making pictures experiment? It hasn’t been verified by others, just like virology. They also think that a special wand somehow can cause the water to be more structured. Ok, cool. So do an experiment with a regular stirrer as control.
Nope… Not going to happen.
It’s just annoying that they do not apply the same scrutiny to alternative things as they do to mainstream things….

I can join in noticing that Kaufman & Cowan - each in their own style - bring critical reasoning to bear on what they then make an identity of reaction and resistance - or fight against. Identity will be defended as self-reinforcement and so is where a presumption to being right over wrong or good over evil, filters, distorts or block awareness.
There is a reason J said 'resist ye not evil!'.
To turn from such temptation to make a self to a wholeness of being, is the basis from which to recognise, real questions and receive real answers.

Any claim to define or arrive at truth should be absent from the tool of science, except as a distilling of truly workable and helpful models of understanding to who we are currently accepting ourselves and our world to be.This living context is fundamental, for conscious purposes can be recognised as framing the focus, while masked or unconscious purposes operate covert agenda by definition.

I am not seeking to frame blame as a tool for arriving at outcomes, but identify where responsibility or indeed faith is misplaced by a mindset or frame of assumed authority rather than extending true witness to a reality we do not create.

The realm of consciousness mattering or the matter of consciousness as we mind it is not at the end of our instruments, and so we learn to recognise what we are putting in as the parameters or predicates for what we are receiving as our result. Garbage in; garbage out - infers that that nature of logic is blind to its creative definitions. That is where I hold for spiritual responsibility or unified purpose - which also translates to workability. For conflicted purpose can only be said to work against function - as if to gain a private result.

It is possible to identify when we are in the realm of a freedom to look at anything from many angles as part of opening new perspectives on what we thought we understood or had 'explained'. This can coincide with chance observations arising from 'mistakes' that show up anomalies that an established ego of 'science' will look away from, dismiss or attack.
The spontaneous structuring of ionised matter in fluid states (or temporarily fluid states) is known and its interaction in water is the basis of life as we know it. The liability of any new perspective is its stuffing into the old wine paradigm of possession and control - or marketising and weaponising. We short circuit an expansion or abort our unfolding fulfilment. I sometimes call it the Herod effect, because an established order cannot restructure itself but that it persists its predicates.

I extended way past your point. But much as I appreciate their willingness to speak into the lockdown of mind under covid, I have not found resonance with the roles they are now taking up or taken in by. Nor am I surprised that as the terrain changes, so does the focus.
I appreciate where the questioning of what is found questionably unfounded extends - such as on this site - rather than ritually running over and over a song for a choir of believers.
It isn't that I seek to sow doubt and disinfo to a THEM that 'lie to us' as a matter of course, but a desire to prepare the way for the movement of a true recognition. I don't hold post-truth to mean anything real - though it carries connotations of a crucifixion.
Are scientists guided by the higher faculties of thought?
Is truth a Self-revealing to the willingness for removing or releasing blocks to our awareness?

Looking At the False as False Opens the True.

in response to the themes in:

Traversing the Land of Fanatics, Part I

https://khmezek.substack.com/p/traversing-the-land-of-fanatics-part/ 

Yes. Well said.
The 'hidden hand' of a self & world set in sacrifice of truth for what each can get (or 'get away' from), for a 'self' set apart from others, such that shifting alliances operate a temporary 'security' masking and distancing over conflict avoided so as to buy 'time' to delay the 'inevitable' where truth is assigned to death instead of this very moment of truly being that we are.

The foundation or entrance to such a world is through the willingness to justify and invest in hate as 'self-protection' and thus as love - for we are love and love is Self-extension as relational being.
The form of hate doesn't matter but will shape our personality as a split mind - for who can attack, deny or hate their self in others and world to be whole and know and share it?

I see the 'satanic or luciferian' agenda as a self-image under gaslight - but that an acceptance of false self is always my own underlying 'gaslighting' - even under relationships (sic) of deceit and coercion - however suavely masked or starkly threatened.

Walking out of or releasing a false, fruitless or meaningless and thus destructive 'relationship' or complex of thought and emotions that will inevitably manifest in our relationships - is the gift of our Spirit - of the truth that can be masked over and lost sight of but that remains ours to live FROM or extend - and thus remember, appreciate and re-inetgrate or heal to a quality that can share in or call forth and honour the true with-ness in others who are never the masking we give them or they present as.

Acknowledging the blocks to communication, without making them the focus of a 'corrective' blaming judgement, allows giving focus wholly to what we truly want and are - in place of to what we are trained by fear to NOT want, as if to get our self in opposition to an 'evil' or threat of fear of pain of loss.

For recognising who we are NOT is already the basis for acting out of an integrity of being we claim by acting from. To be truly moved is not really 'trying to be', but whole in being.
Life is a movement of embodiment that breaks the illusions of attempt to possess and control it. But any destructive intent is entirely our making given co-creative reinforcement. Finding the balance points within the tides and timing of an always changing is the discernment within our being integral to life - not set under or over by judgements set by grievance.

Life is not of our making, yet we are free to make of it to share in as our experience.
This is what we get backwards when we bamboozle ourself but blame it on our world.