Silent weapons for war by stealth

An article on the Guardian's coverage of Apple's corporate plans for UK education

"Silent weapons for quiet wars" runs beneath the sideshow of conflict dynamics to institute global technocracy, wielded of course by the insiders to the setting up and operation of such systems of control.

It is on a need to know basis - and the narrative to any level of access privilege may assume it is privy to more than others but is no less fed and led. Partial thinking can belief its own thought. The idea that energy systems can be exploited and harnessed to serve intended outcomes can mask private gratifications. Such private gratifications can become a 'power class' running on a common belief in power struggle as the core or stark fact of human existence under death - and so a death cult operates the attempt to coerce or induce the sacrifice of the living to support a private sense of alignment in power over life, hidden behind the mask of serving humanity. 

This can be seen as the 'elitism' of a power class predating upon the rest of the population - and the resources that are for all - and our children and generations to come. It can no less be seen in the demand of the population for 'unconsciousness' or protection and escape from innate responsibility for living. The latter is less obvious because it is in our own mind and hides by being focused upon as the minds of others - whether perpetrators, victims or 'saviours'.

A true salvation from the cycle of victimhood as power, is awakened responsibility of receptive awareness. It remains true that the meaning of a thing is what you use it for. But unless we wake up to a true gratitude for the meaning that living is, we operate as if built in meanings run a prison planet.

If we want wishful fantasy to overlay or cover the true, we then generate false currency and seek to strengthen it by inducing or recruiting others to share in it. The true remains always and forever true - but this has no meaning in a framework of distorted and filtered 'meanings' put together by all the king's horses and all the king's men. True is known by alignment and extension of expression. 

Meanwhile the investment of identity in what is not true, masks who you are the inherently the uncovering of, when you are willing to align in unified purpose rather than attempt to force alignment on fragmented and conflicted purpose.

The Ideas that are basis of our experience of the world, change and evolve. But beneath all changing appearance it remains true that you give and receive as one - that is what you give out sets the measure of your receiving - and what you insist on 'receiving' in place of true will set the measure of your thought, word and deed as your experience of your world.

Tyrannous thought dictates through a sense of 'an offer you cant refuse'. This may be an inducement to privilege - with the understanding that to not take it will result in personal pain and loss. Discerning what is due to Caesar and what is due to God (Inherency of being) is not going to arise from Caesar's thinking or mind-framing.

There is a choice here, but it is never the choice as fear-thinking frames choosing. All roads lead to Rome indicates the nature of power structure on Earth, but all roads lead Home is the alignment in the power within Life that we forfeit in attempt to have power over it.

A lifetime is a journey of experience and discovery at a deeper level that the narrative overlay of surface thinking and is always engaged and lived now. Collectively, we cannot but enact the conflicts that lie within us, but in the recognition of this is a new choice of no longer persisting in reaction, but instead listening where life is - instead of running where we think it is or should be.

So the Guardian is but another guardian of a a narrative manipulation? Then if you look there, look to see the truth that denial implicitly reveals (as indeed Jonathan Cook has in some degree above).

The desire for true is a receptivity and alertness and not a demand in comes in the forms or the channels of the old way of thinking and seeing.

It isn't that journalism can demand the truth, so much as journalists can refuse to settle or accept less than true , and thus persist in holding to account, by giving true witness. Inconvenient truths may be denied, and so speaking truth to power is wise not to operate personal grievance - which is so easily subverted, or used to self-invalidate or self-incriminate.

This calls for feeling what we feel and finding a way to integrate and align more deeply - instead of splitting in terror or rage - or a well intentioned but blind attempt to order all things in shades of grey. Consciousness is a scope and spectrum of experience. Control by limitation is tool we have become unconscious tools of, and so 'everything is backwards'.

Uncovering and Facing the Unthinkable

Malcolm said 

... I have finally got entirely fed up of the moronic advice to stay out of the sun. It is funny how one group, in this case dermatologists, manage to completely take over an area and rule the roost. Then everyone cowers, fearing their disapproval. i wonder how people have died, and are dying unnecessarily, because of this irrational fear of sunshine? Did no-one ever hear of evolution. That big yellow thing has been up there, in the sky, shining down for four billion years – and we are supposed to believe is is harmful to health…. jeez.

I am sure you could dig a little deeper than dermatologists. It is possible to argue that we self-generate fears and become afraid of our own shadow, but the way that works is more complex, but not so different than Chicken Licken. However the versions I have of heard Chicken Licken ascribe Foxy Loxy to the role of an opportunist. Our Foxy Loxy does not have to wait on fears to arise so as to manipulate them, but operates a 'mafia like organisation' or indeed 'power class' to propagate, nurture and farm fear in what would otherwise be... our minds. Indeed our lives!

Fear-defined identity is a usurping of our mind, that runs as if to protect itself - as if it is true - (as if it speaks for the true of you).
One of the benefits of walking in nature, meditations, yoga or in fact anything that opens an immersive receptive presence, is the releasing of surface tensioned fear-thinking such as to be more aware of the nature of choices being made.

But the compartmentalisation of the mind is revealed in its liability of being instantly triggered into old and learned conditioned learning reactions. Education is not 'information-stuffing' or programming, but the ability to question and discern for ourselves. Discernment is different from 'thinking' - it is a space of feeling awareness in which a wholeness of being recognises itself in relation to whatever is occurring. Many who assign themselves 'independent autonomy' take credit for qualities of heart and mind that are in truth more akin to the gift of being, rather than control over life. Running a narrative assertion over what happens naturally becomes an illusion to defend - and a source of guilt, fear and conflict.

That we can identify such as to be terrified of love's 'exposure' says that we can be deeply defended against what we actually are - and all that gives and supports life - unless on OUR terms! - is reflected in becoming so weak as to afraid of our own shadow AND the Sun that casts it. The idea of limiting STRAIN on heart functions to external conditions will set terms that deny investigation of inner programming or conditioning - or even perhaps unfaced trauma of unhealed family and societal generational relationships - whether this operates 'epigenetically' or via means as yet unclear.

It is often so that facing death calls forth a desire to reconcile, make peace with and yield a personal assertion to such connection. This is not "up in the clouds" but a profound self-honesty of a tangible presence. More apt is to see that the assertive personal narrative identity is a tendency of dissociation that will seek resolution in 'outer terms' for what in a sense set the patterns and themes of its orientation in life before it had access to thought of any self-reflective 'rational' nature.

The power of guilt in locking down or setting the felt heart in grievance or self-denial is no less than the power to pretend we escape it in our rational thinking. What lies beneath is revealed in the patterns of its expression. When what we thought to escape is faced and in a sense revisited,  we are of course profoundly transformed. Those who have faced and lived the death of a loved one walk a different world than those who keep the unthinkable unthinkable to protect the thoughts that are permitted.

The intent and attempt to deny and defend against light of awareness is without a true foundation, and so protects the exposure of a false sense of one that is overlaid upon the true.
At what point does the pain of such a strain yield to the willingness to seek  and find another way of looking at our life and world? It may be that death is chosen rather than face what we are unprepared and unsupported in looking at. In a world that is choosing death, I choose differently, anyway and in any way that is given my willingness to discern it. Fear of truly living is what cripples us, and the weakness we cling to operates a sense of emotional or rational justification for not choosing within life - but choosing to protect an image imposed upon it that inherently operates 'in the dark' or 'unconsciously' under a surface thinking passed off as 'reality'. Anything we experience is our reality-experience of the moment - but that does not mean it reflects the truth of who we are - even if it reflects the freedom as to what can be thought or imagined.

P.S
The belief that the Sun, and Earth's relation to it, has been essentially unchanged during the course of our development and of that of life on Earth is at odds with the Mythic records of Antiquity - that is, the collective memory of our forebears, which a rational definition excludes almost by definition and in some sense persists as the survival of and escape from conflicts and traumatic experience of that which is no longer evident - yet has shaped the consciousness we operate from.