Thursday, 8 September 2016

Globalism is dying?

Into this article on the Daily Bell

Financial Times: Globalism Is Dying, Even Though It’s the Better Choice

# 1
Retreat - feigned or actual - is a strategy. A ratchet effect may push further than it knows it can hold, but the retreat leaves a significant gain from which to regroup for the next push. Perhaps to return as saviours to whatever chaos can be elicited or triggered in our reaction.

However the very context of consciousness shifts in ways that leaves thinking impotent that once seemed un-challengable. When everything is lies - don't listen to them. Do something real - be with what moves you.

Those who adapt to exploit change, ride close to the wave, perhaps - but exploit is not the term I would choose as much as being in alignment with what is truly going on - rather than in alignment with a predation upon what is truly going on but is not recognized because all one can see is through a getting mentality. There is no relationship or communication with a getting mentality. It is not the wave.

A persistent focus in seeking and consolidating power over generations operates through negative self interest. The 'invisible hand' in reverse. As long as fear operates the thinking then the tares growing among the crop multiply and - as I read it - bring us to a checkmate, breakdown or paralysis - if not into self-destruction on a huge scale. Is there another planet to move on to?

Our global communications and infrastructure make globalism a fact on some level - but the basis of our communication and how we organize and live is a top down parasitic financial-corporate dictate upon a cultivated but also generally accepted dependency. Whatever the futurists predict who are paid big money by big money who then position in advance to what is presumed probable it must be very dire to account for the desperation and careless and callous disregard that is inviting and creating dire consequence as a self-fulfilling fear. For there is no genuinely positive vision for humanity being offered or inspired in any way that is being taken up or supported. It is all fear-based.

The Markets are known to have an 'emotional' undercurrent whatever the rationalisations of account or control - but of course so does human society and consciousness. Drip drip poison of fear does not in fact leverage any real control so much as undermine trust, integrity and enthusiasm of endeavour. The big machinery of corporate profiteering will persist in sucking up wealth regardless of outsourcing true costs because they are set up and purposed to do so - and only a change in law could hold them to honest account or social responsibility. A free market for the power cartels to regulate all else off the Earth is no freedom at all. True freedom must have accountability and responsibility or it can and does extend to rapacious exploitation, corruption and heartless denial and destruction of life. Thus a restoration of true communication, within us as without, is the foundation from which true account is called and witnessed.

Life rises anew from a fresh sense of tangibly felt and shared worth. Our foundation is not a weapon or a leverage or a set of ideas to make into buzzword marketing spin. It is the basis from which all else derives its meaning in us. If coming from fear is conscious - then those fears can be explored, tested and perhaps moved through. But denied fear operates a lie - a concealment, diversion, masking or subterfuge.

There are some who consciously cultivate using deceit as a weapon upon those they do not count worthy or of significance - to the degree that they have no sense of 'lying' even in the full awareness of deceit, and no sense of moral consequence, self-doubt or check. "All is fair in in love and war" and the people of the lie, love to win and refuse to lose. The nature of this consciousness is exposing itself in its effects in society as hate, blame, fear and division - and whatever anyone's intended or professed agenda, these wreak destruction spiritually, mentally, emotionally and physically. Indeed replicating the terror that gave power to the lie. The pattern fruits or replicates its foundation - or one can only arrive in where one is coming from.

If the lie is not you - then watch for hate, fear and blame and honestly account for its effect in you - when dumbly reacted out from, rather than consciously integrated or may I even say healed or undone. Why presume any power to call corporates to account if you wont live the same?

Political 'analysis' often incites polarized identity in hate. Its understandable to feel it when hurt, fear or a sense of denial is triggered for we are all already loaded with conditionings that can be and are triggered - sometimes by manipulative design - but in any case in our relationships and ultimately within our selves.

Without a true foundation one needs and uses the 'OTHER' to generate a strong sense of self and others to reinforce and validate it. That is exactly what operates the attempt to control Life rather than feel and embody one's balance and fulfilment within its flow.

If you hate being lied to - be straight with yourself right now - and see if you throw the first stone or are in a perspective and relation from which to open a communication within yourself where none was believed possible. One can 'try to live' by asserting a presentation that seeks validation - but at expense of investing in a mask that compartmentalizes and conflicts - and requires the sacrifice of an inner joy - whatever substitutions are engaged instead.

Joy elicits a wholeness of being that is not indulging or engaging in hurt, fear or a sense of denial. It can be called different things - and yet you recognize aliveness and connection of being rather than lose yourself in a script of self-isolating gratification. If I don't appreciate what I appreciate in life I depreciate my life and find a script of anything and everything to hang it on - instead of turning to what works for me. And no matter what - turning to what works.

Fearism isn't really alive and so it cannot die - but it can be starved of being fed with sacrifice of life - for 'THEY' cannot force anyone to give up their will - but have to trick them into a false one. So why not use the messengers of fear to check your ground and keep your house in order - which is not really outside you - but your core integrity which grows by living from it.

LynnCarol replied to me
I don't worry about netizons, they are the quiet, closeted people who dare only to speak from a platform of anonymity, and most of them are afraid of their own shadow.
Yes - don't worry - period!
No need to resort to put-downs to have faith in self, life and world!

What the judgement of self-concept rejects or refuses to accept IS our own shadow; the 'unconscious' that we think is out of mind but is no less active as a sense of dissonance, denial and conflicted self that blocks awareness of Cause or Authorship - leading to uncertainty and presumption of anonymous creation - a platform from which the delusion of self-creation seems meaningful - is projected onto everyone else, who then fights them for authorship.
What you believe you have taken must you believe will be taken from you.

# 2

The 'globalism dying', is bait  (see the emotional reactions of the fooled) - the 'it's a better choice' is an implanted suggestion attached to that emotional response. When a positive emotional response is generated - as in "YEAY! globalism is on the RUN! the associated attachment goes in to the subconscious. Which puts an energetic of positive response with a suggestion that rationally one may have negative or critical views about. If rational views generated action advertisers and politicians would use rational discourse - and if you have noticed - they don't.

The persona or indeed its associated tribal identity of a polarised win/lose conflict is the undercurrent subconscious fight/flight routine - that runs AS you while you accept it as true of you. It is properly a response to operate when there is no time for rational evaluation or felt discernment - so as to keep you in physical existence through a sudden threat so as to then refocus in a whole or integrated attention and awareness.

Repeated triggering of this reflex in trauma and subsequent manipulation of self or other as part of perceived temporary expedient or gain - conditions the mind to be effectively run by what indeed can and has been called the primitive or reptilian brain.

Conditioning that is not addressed becomes the 'condition' that is presumed and accepted real - and any attempt to them address it is seen as un-real, or dissonant to the business of life within the conditioned reality.

The irony is that hidden in the most basic survival urge is the most destructive influence to Humanity - and perhaps to Life on Earth of which we are a Consciousness Expression.

An exclusively physical body is dead. The exclusion of the non physical excepting as exploited to manipulate the physical is using Life to bring about death. No matter how irrational it seems to the 'thinking' of a conditioned mind - the actual choice is death - but in the guise of the 'survival' of a disembodied mind - that stands outside Life and in place of it - as the power over it. Death is spiritual blindness, death is feeling disconnect - mental dissociation and denied or blocked physical function. The transformational nature of all experience includes the withdrawal of focus from the objects of identification when it no longer serves purpose - and in that sense death is not a denial of life so much as a release. Fear of change and fear of death are associated as with fear of any negative outcome.

'Between the devil and the deep blue sea' is a saying that illuminates why the deceit is chosen and the truth is kept hidden. The deep blue sea is not a sense of control or even a sense of self as we take our self to be. More like a void onto which we project our fears and the deceits that fuel them.

Wanting to know the truth in our terms is trying to force Life to join in and take part in our conditioned narratives and definitions - and this makes the Movement of Life seem limited, weak, unreliable, or non-existent - while the voice for supporting the narrative gets louder and associates as the power to protect or preserve the self-in-threat.

To know the truth of our terms we have to release them - not to an 'other' but in yielding to our own being. If the lies of the mind have not sickened you enough yet - then you will think you - as you define yourself are your own being - and yet that exclusive sense is a partial true - to be corrected of distortion and expanded within an inclusive integrative recognition of being - which is the gift OF being and not an object or ability to be harnessed or used by a mistaken partial sense of self arrived at within confusion. Silence is not empty and the Void is not annihilation, nor is space or awareness a nothing. On the contrary fear is a mistaken identity - but the waking of this recognition is a compassionate translation of denial to true acceptance. No one heals or resolves an issue they are not willing or able to face or own - but who is without some awareness of their desire for hiding or avoiding an honesty of noticing. The people of the lie are not people who lie so much as the willingness to use it as power and protection - but a lie is seeking to hide a feared true - and if that fear is truly unjustified, it is an error and not a sin. Calling for correction and not inflicted pain of vengeful hate.

As it stands the Daily Bell may be promoting the ruse by not in some way bracketing and identifying the payload. yes the word 'claims'.
Perhaps "FT ed uses 'globalism is dying' to insinuate it as the better choice?"

And is not globalism v populism another faux choice?

From your conclusion:
I am not denied my own course of action in my life - though I may act out from mistaken perceptions. The notion 'taking control of my own life' is worthy of expanding upon and consideration - for all these terms are 'loaded' and can mean many conflicting things and therefore persist a conflicted agenda of a 'control-mentality'.

Clearer saner perceptions lead to saner choices. I see that insane choices promote insane results that then validate their premise. I suggest the whole record - or thought system that we base our understanding on - is corrupted and therefore a fresh currency system is called for - from the Ground up.

If I uncovered dishonesty in my personal narrative identity assumptions - that I have invested my life in - would I release that investment to align true - or persist in what then would be a knowing falsity? And if the latter - would that be while enquiring into and discovering more as to what IS true or by denying the denial with heavier investment in narrative spin and heavier consequence of entrapment in a lie?

- - -

# concerndcitizen said

The is the end of centralization and everything will now move to be decentralization. Centralization had certain advantages that were abused by those in a position to abuse them. Those with access to the top levels of banking and politics were able to milk it for trillions, while everyone else saw a lowered standard of living. This is now obvious to the masses.

My response to concerndcitizen

Or decentralisation as defined and controlled under a technocracy administered by elitists? "You can choose whatever you want - and these are the terms in which you must operate - or else...".
Where exactly are the choke points to the ability to live? Housing, energy, food supply and distribution, water, healthcare and environmental integrity, access to information and education, social and legal requirements including means to access any of the above - ie money. The owners of the financial system have leverage through all of the above in a number of ways and is effectively strangling Life on Earth to death, or subjection or perhaps some kind of torture in which power gratification over powerlessness runs both hot and cold. But I say this in appreciation of the denial splits of compartmentalisations that operate beneath the persona we present. assert, and defend.

So maybe you mean this is the time when bad cop leaves the room and good cop enters. Are such ploys obvious to the many?

Monday, 5 September 2016

Unworthiness of Others

archie1954 said: (In a thread on 'conspiracy theory')

I read this article and I cringe because I know that the American public are too stupid to understand how they have been bamboozled. You see the truth laid out for you and you are still too foolish to understand what it means. What in Heaven’s name to you need to lead you to the truth? I'm sorry but Americans deserve to be lied to because they are too dense t even contemplate the truth!

My comment to archie:

Perhaps now you understand how it is that people can treat other human beings with callous disregard for their lives - because they are deemed 'unworthy'.

I see that awakening 'others' is a ruse by which a partial understanding is frozen and blocked from full acceptance.

If your awakening to a true sense of worth doesn't reach or seed in others a like reaction - move on to where you find a more resonant reception - as well as ensuring you are not preaching different from what you practice.

Accepting others where they are at is not possible without a like quality for ourselves. Self rejection is a kind of hate that tends to blame life or others or the past - for its loss of presence. I have a sense that others carry aspects of a wholeness of which I am also integral - and that I can at least start to recognize judgements and underlying fears that formed my personality - in some willingness to regain and share in a sense of worth - rather than fixated in what is 'wrong' with everyone and everything.

If everything is possible to find if we look for it enough - then what we find can also be an indicator of what we are in fact looking for and finding - why we want that is a line of curious discovery.

Ultimately others make choices - as do you - and live the fruits thereof. But as you are becoming aware, many have given away their awareness of choice to a mind that they believe offers at least temporary power and protection against a worse outcome than not obeying their mind would believe (according to their mind's thinking).

The capacity to challenge one's experience is the recognition that perception and interpretation are not revealing a self-evident reality - but are a construct serving an agenda. Believing is seeing the reinforcement or corroboration of the belief.

As I indicated a moment ago on this page - is the call to war a ruse over the call to heal? So as to leave hate operating in your background - running your show - providing you with an identity that is defended against recognizing the need for healing? Then you understand why people are well defended against any incoming threat to their thought system. But in any moment of willingness for communication - seeds of an energetic nature are shared - and then call forth their own process of fruiting in ways relevant to those ones - which may be completely different in form than my own - but share in purpose.

The true teachers are learners and the most alive musicians get out of the way of allowing the music through. The attempt to be a 'someone in our own right' does not endear us to others - excepting they see something to get from or use for their own agenda.

The world you see depends on the mind you see it through. And this is a freedom of choice - even if we think we have had that freedom denied or lost it in an entanglement of deceit. What thought runs in your name? That is your freedom of association. Perhaps it was your sense of a feeling of caring amidst a sense of despair that sparked me to respond to the sense of caring. It is easy to find food for despair when dispirited. But would we rather be right and in miser-y or uncover errors whose correction frees us to joy? Yes - many may persistently 'choose' the first - but where are the witnesses to joy - and where are the messengers sent to find them? If you wait for 'everyone else' - you limit and deny your truth for a sense of 'belonging'. But in taking one step in true willingness - willingness grows perspective in which to see another. I don't ask you to see the forms of unworthiness as different - so much as see from a sense of worth - which brings a compassionate recognition in place of the need to change the world or else!

Of course you can fake it - but that will only bring to you a world of fakes. And of course your 'mind' cant believe such worth is true or open to being seen - because that is the whole deal of mind-control - to cover over the truth so as to assert and impose a personal version. And then we become habituated and conditioned by choosing to prefer our personal assertion of mind to an act of listening response - and define our life out of existence.

Conspiracy to keep a mind in darkness

Conspiracy Theory in America
by Lance deHaven-Smith