Rats in the mind of doublethink

in reply to
https://off-guardian.org/2019/06/13/orwell-prize-who-made-the-cut/

Orwell described a problem in a way that seemed to be some sort of sketching out of a dystopian trend - though his original title was '1948' ...

Doublespeak is the mind's capacity to package toxic contradiction into narrative acceptance so as to avert, escape or mitigate 'Room 101'.

Perhaps the elephant in the room regarding such masked and deceitful tyrannous thought, word and acted-out outcome is fear of pain of loss.

Orwell's crucifiction of his protagonist is without any resurrection or redemption and so is a toxic message that SEEMS to impart privileged information to an actually controlled 'opposition'.

Addressing the fears, hates and denials in our psyche as a willingness for healing instead of the persistence of an opposition to the conditioned and induced hatred, is to stop feeding the Troll and open to other ways of seeing, which includes uncovering and undoing self-contradictions in our thought and emotional investment.

Part of the issue I see is the attempt to morally coerce the mind set in fear and division or 'evil' towards 'goodness'. For it is the same force that effects a state of division in the first place.

This signature pattern is pervasive to our thinking and so to our world, as a protection racket. That is it offers 'protection' in exchange for sacrifice of Life - but as a self-justified and necessary lesser evil, packaged as if a positive or a power in its own right.

How does one uncover, face and allow fear to be undone of its hidden role in the mind?

By watching the mind (our thought, emotional and physical reaction), instead of running it - or rather allowing it to run unwatched while diverted and distracted by a false flagged world. 

It is the nature of denial to project away as an exclusion or rejection, by the same law that a positive appreciation automatically shares out or radiates. To know what we do, is to be awake and on purpose. That we can think we know when we are in fact sleepwalking is so self -evident as to need no other example than any moment of observation.

Part of the role of demons or terror symbols is of guarding the treasure. Fear of love's intimacy generates diversionary drama to protect the fear from full exposure or transparency and accountability. And does so in the name or under the symbol, image or wish of love. Masked in the forms of what it is the denial of.

Love is the capacity to be with what is to the revealing of the recognition of truth.

What is a cage of starved and ravenous rats set about one's head but the symbol of an inner conflict fleshed out? Enforced scarcity under deceit breeds controllable appetites or indeed golems for needs must and invested wants become socially inducted and accepted as needs and thus a social exclusion to be without. Social credit (carbon-guilt) or otherwise is a development of the idea of a rigged system of control. Those who comply and conform in allegiance to a god of sacrifice temporarily gain support in keeping their fears outside their bubble.

Who can call on truth while engaged in its denial as bubble of self-protection - excepting in imaged symbol or concepts that reinforce the bubble of separation from the feared or hated?

We assign to conditions the results of our own conditioning. To rewaken as presence is not an act of rebellion to a past made in anger but the freedom to walk out of a mind no longer spellbound under its own word.

As for the call to give attention to a substitute reality? Let the dead bury the dead is not an abandonment or judgement against the living, but rather a refusal to join in the reinforcement of false thinking or emotional coercion. No one actually IS the role they play in the world or in any particular relational context. But we all assign or cast others in the roles we give them.

The core elements or archetypes of myth or drama structure our psyche as the basis for the development of the personality construct. Prometheus' room 101 was the flip side of stealing the 'light of the Gods'.

But if we have it - is is freely given to the asking. We only run off with the guilt of a false light, by which to seem to become 'as gods' yet meet its flip side as a sense of subjection and powerlessness.

Our core separation fallacy re-enacts as the victim and the victimiser down through the millennia - as if the latter could ever become victorious over Life - as its usurper and replacement. Chasing a fantasy by which to evade or avert a feared self-revealing. "It's life Jim, but not as can be truly known or shared".

'Zombie Apocalypse' or' Alien disclosure' may be closer to home than 'Out There'. Sleepwalking minds in blind bodies invoke an alien will - a power from 'outside' to save them from themselves. The demand for unconsciousness generates the conditions that support and maintain it - under some guise of passing off a placeholder instead of a living presence.

The ability to Call or Ask is not hardwired to a self-conflict, but having received it we cannot see any real choices. This is the same as saying we are free to deny our  free will, so as to no longer recognise that its consequence is also an expression of freedom as power to accept. Whatever we accept as our self/reality we go forth from and multiply in our relational experience. The idea of the denial of the will by the limitation and division of mind, is an illusion of power that depends on what it attacks to seem to exist. Such self-contradictions do not bear exposure, and so secrets and lies operate notional security or 'intelligence' that makes sacrifice of the Living to keep a dead system 'sustainable'. 

'Too big to fail' means too invested in to allow willingness to re-evaluate. 'The Show must go on!' But are we a captive audience, or are we always inherently free to give attention, and thus value and meaning, to thought arising from wholeness absent coercion - instead of doublethink in support of a driven or compulsive re-action? For not all thought is a 'blocking signal', but only that which gnaws like rats at our mind in guise of 'protecting us' from a defencelessness against truth and freedom, as hidden agenda of pain masking as joy.

WHO is in control?

in reply to 

https://www.anhinternational.org/resources/anh-intl-heartbeat/who-is-in-control/

posted into

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/news-alerts-week-24-2019/

WHO is in control!
Or more accurately, NGO's operating as fronts for disproportionate wealth seeking disproportionate and pervasive power, through the back door of manipulative deceit, rather than in open relational communication or indeed Reason Itself.

But deceit can only 'control' a willingness to be deceived - and this is where a deeper self-honesty has to challenge our pet loves, fears and hates, for deceits offer self-inflations,  relative to  our respective aversions and un-faced or unhealed relational conflict.
but the disposition of a mind under deceit is to script in terms of control and subjection - through pathogenic actors and 'saviour' interventions, that personalise into polarised and filtered conflict and limitation what is actually and expression of communication toward balance - but generally unseen and unrecognized by the addiction and affliction of conflict as the hope, wish or promise of control as some kind of personal power or personal - (read private) - salvation.

It is my sense that what we act from as belief and expectation, is effectively scripting our reality-experience regardless what actually is the case and that what we think we believe is belied by our own thought, word and deed, and yet to a large extent masked out from full awareness by personal and social mores or indeed memes of mutually reinforcing 'acceptability' of officially accepted narrative reality.

I have read of monkey traps where  the monkey can reach into a fixed down gourd to grasp a fruit but cannot then retrieve the hand with the fruit and also cannot release it grasp on what it wants, and so can be collected or harvested by the trapper.

Much of what we think we want, hurts us, but is framed in mind so as to seem to be a dissonance with a cause outside ourself.
This is when what we want is framed and defined by what we are in fear of and aversion to, rather than a directly felt true desire.
Framed in sickness and lack, we can only seek power in terms of sickness and lack - which is the corrupted idea of power that seems to control our world because that is the idea given power by a mind in conflict and fear as the attempt to limit and suppress  the chaos and 'contagion' of a breakdown of communication by the imposition or interjection of 'control' into the pain of a lost Intimacy.

The nature of a healthy mind and body is its transparency to living relational being. In a sense we do not know what we are until we lose it for a conflicted entanglement in what we are not - and then have the experience of lack and loss of connection, communication and free expression to self-doubt and division that then projects to frame and colour a 'world gone wrong'.

So while I could indicate all sorts of pointers in the world for 'who is in control', I also recognise they are scripted or cast as expressions of the fear of life, of intimacy and communication, seemingly powerful in their role as the framing of narrative reality as the hidden basis of 'control' by filtering and distorting limitation or induced and enforced scarcity, lack and toxicity. For without such conditions a corrupt and corrupting 'power' could have no appeal nor induce allegiance and compliance in sacrifice of self, others - and biosphere - to a fantasy of life and power given worth-ship in false with-ness as an act of mental and emotional (psychic) dissociation acted out upon the body and dumped upon the body as a burden of strain and toxicity that cannot be 'sustained' without the deceits of the mind that packages toxic debt into complex instruments that are then passed off as if a positive appreciation, a roadmap to salvation, or a masking identity of self-justifiction by which to temporarily outsource or assign pain or consequence of an ill-gotten grasp to anywhere and anyone ELSE.

The body is our corporate expression, using it for loveless or conflicted and divisive agenda, blocks its function to generate a like reflection of blocked or conflicted world in which the body is raised as the personification of a separated mind or reality in 'escape' from or 'victory' over feared Life, at the same time as being abused and exploited and dumped on - with the consequence of asserting and persisting in using life of self and other for getting - FORGETTING.

Getting is the generation of the experience of self-lack. The issues of possession and control are those of marketising and weaponising - which is the call to suckle the teat of deceit as the milk of false premises, promises and outcomes.

Awakening responsibility for consciousness is the simple willingness that breaks the spell. The naked 'Emperor' is not attacked by truth weaponised and seeking vengeance, but given true 'with-ness' in shared worth-ship of a wholeness of being.

"who told you, you were naked?" said the Lord - may reveal its meaning in terms of a sense of self-lack arising from mistaken identification. As in being phished by the forms of something that are presented or interpreted  unmindfully. Or rather through the filtering of a mindset of auto-reaction. The replacement of human kind by systemic or robotic substitution is the logical outcome of out-sourcing intelligence in fear of dispossession and loss of control. Harmony is of relational being and a signature of wholeness. When we try to fix it or grasp it in fixed forms we 'kill' the music - or rather sacrifice our capacity to be truly moved in exchange for a carrot or a stick and so paint ourself into a corner from which we cannot escape. Rather than seek complex repackaging of toxic debts in the 'Newspeak', of weaponised and marketised insight, why not cancel or expunge the debt and clear the account?

'Release and be released' is simply an awakened alignment in 'give as you would receive'. The unseen power of denial 'scripts' our perception and response. Fear has to be owned to be transformed and undone by true with-ness in shared worth-ship, giving in the measure of a true receipt. Willingness releases a false but driven sense of self-will because we are willing to listen for truth instead of telling it what to be.

PS I often put it as 'give only as your would in truth receive'. This is because until we uncover it to our awareness, we carry unconscious or denied self hate that effectively works to block, derail or sabotage our true appreciation and inherence in living.