Modern dance has lost its Soul

I confess to not reading the article - but posted to the subject header - for as a dancer, I already have perspective to attempts to impose or coerce Life into forms of mimicry.

My comment:

Modernity embodies a loss of or sense of disconnection from Soul - where Soul is deep and truly Felt Life.
Mimicking conformities - and conforming to identities of reaction to conformity as if 'free' is a loss of Consciousness on Earth - occurring by choice and consent while framed in narratives of deceit.
To be Moved - is the core quality of our existence as expressions of Consciousness. The identity predicated on control, regards being Moved as dangerous, untrustworthy and 'out of control' - and so the flow of Life in movement, relation and communication is engineered to imposed dictates from old conditioning of the power-hungry - who are unmindful of the terror and rage that drives them because they 'justify it' with rationalisations.
We are not Moved as robots, but within a freedom to accept. This is a quality of discernment rising out of a balanced relationship and communication that simply knows and feels where to go and how to be. It is the art of living.
The command and control mentality - with its persona of acceptability-seeking-validation, is the war of getting and winning - for the 'prize' of self-specialness and superiority or prevailing over. It usurps and subverts the forms of any fresh Movement of Life to serve a purpose of control in place of the Play of Feeling that is inspirational Meaning of Life rather than a prize carrot or the stick of negative 'incentive'.
And those who feel their 'security' is provided by such imposition of control join as one in denying or demonising the Divine Impulse as they have since long before the reflection Jesus offered to illuminate such loveless self-harming.
False currency needs to be left unused. Let the dead bury the dead is the Call to invest and embody the Living. Dead thinking blinds with false rationalizations for lovelessness. Mechanical 'joy' reduces the Miracle of Life to targets and tickboxes. Better to wake to acknowledge joylessness than lose Consciousness to empty ritual. At least to feel through and transform the negativity so as to  uncover the Call to Joy as it Moves us - and rejoin The Dance. Life is a Dance - to the willingness within.

Dealing with science 'deniers'

The issue being framed in this article and conversation is 'how to deal with 'science denialists'.

My response:

How to deal with human beings?
Communicate with integrity!
If you perceive a 'science denialist' in place of a human being then there are clearly some distortion filters operating as your 'mind'.
If what is meant by such a term is how to deal with someone who refuses to open or engage in communication then, if you want to, you can express your perspective as best you can and move on to where some sense of shared worth and value of relationship exists.
By the time an issue has become polarized with identity investments - there is no opportunity for anything NOT to be filtered and distorted by the coercive attempt to set agenda or determine outcome.

Science can deal with the what - up to a point at least - but it cannot begin to address the why - except as dictated by the definitions that are used to determine the what.

How to deal with a polarised and arrogant rationalism that actively operates to deny and replace the feeling quality of awareness?
Don't ! - Because it is not listening and will only use everything you give it against you.
However, where there is a genuine sense of humanity, there is a capacity to feel, resonate, discern and influx expanded perspective. Indeed, without the non physical, the why would be missing.
Without the felt movement of life, robotic programs run as forms of mimicry - including the virtual realm of fake emotion for a fake persona. The survival of the right to deny Life by asserting an oppositional persona. Denial is the freedom not to accept. This can be used FOR sanity or against it - by slitting off from a relational wholeness to defend a conceptually split agenda - which is generally negatively defined.
When enough people are stuck in the same place (imprinted by the same conditioning) they call it reality.

One cannot talk only about the 'world' and really have anything to do with truth. Truth is not in the world, but is a congruency or honesty of integrity - of unified purpose. Conflicted identities cannot have anything to do with unified purpose for they are the conflict by which it is denied to a truly felt awareness.

The attempt to eradicate or overcome conflict with force is the righteousness trap. There are no holy wars. But there is a holiness to Life that can dawn in the mind that desists from using war on Life to force it to conform to self concept.
Science can no more be denied than anything true. Excepting in the mind or choice that usurps the true with a false substitute - some trojan that passes off - some tricksy financial instrument that becomes accepted currency.
Once scientism serves a hidden agenda - many will smell a rat or sense the bait and wont take it. And their own persona may rationalize all kinds of stuff around that - but a true honesty is not coercive nor appeals to guilt and fear to unsettle and induce conformity of allegiance. Regardless the 'fact of the matter' I don't care for loveless and deceptive trojan agenda - ESPECIALLY when dressed in such seemingly unarguable presentation.

http://arstechnica.co.uk/staff/2015/12/ars-science-qa-how-do-deal-with-science-denialists/

A Tale of Two Placebos

A Tale of Two Placebos
This Ars article offers a self-righteous anti homoeopathy agenda - perhaps in it presumption of victory over magic and enlightened alignment with T Truth.
I believe this anti homeopathy movement has been set off and encouraged by design - as the movement away from the allopathic pharmaceutical interventions and management of sickness makes drug-whores out of doctors - because such is their essential training  and function in a technocratically engineered society.
Anyway - here is my response...



Definitions frame and filter perception of whatever actually is moving or communicating itself within awareness.
The rigidly set, 'subject-denying' imposition of conceptual framing is a kind of 'anti-magic' that asserts itself in righteousness by every means to subvert and undermine and invalidate the Movement of Being that is tangibly felt Life. It does so by attempting to solve its conflicted sense of self in external terms.

This dissociation or splitting of consciousness has counterparts in reflection and reaction that indeed are also magical attempts to resolve a conflict by internal or subjective assignments of power and blame and protection.

The core emotional state of split consciousness is one that ranges between terror and rage, and compounded with guilt, blame and shame.

The surface personality structure is a masking of such raw imprinting in which the conflicted issues surface as dissonance of impotence and frustration in which the 'reality' of the perceptions are adapted to in order to survive or indeed prevail over.

The missing or denied quality in the conflicted sense of self is relationship and communication, and these are substituted for by a hierarchy of roles in which status and identity is derived externally - as a result of conditioned experience - asserted to be one's independent 'self'.

To be truly listened to, cared for, extended worthiness, recognized by another living being, is a key transformative context in which what has not found communication in expression can rise and become the shift in which a re-integrative movement of consciousness or 'healing', undoes the segregative dissociation and is experienced as a more aligned and less conflicted sense of self and relational experience or world.

Ultimately the world is props that serve the narrative or core definitions of the focusing consciousness. Different personality make-up attracts different kinds of 'permission slips' through which to allow the release of limiting and invalidating baggage.

One of the most destructive of which is the idea that there is but one true FORM (or definition) of Truth. This is inherently rejecting and denying or invalidating of all else. While this idea operates 'self-concept' there is no relationship, communication or free will - only a compulsive dictate issuing from the distortion-filter of the idol taken as self.

The most subtle perceptions and conceptions of existence are of vibrational correspondences. To put it in simple metaphor, you ONLY receive the channel you are programmed into receiving and if you take that as The Truth, you are necessarily unaware of the full range of frequency of experience AND  the tuning dial of free willing receptivity.

The ongoing abuse and denial of the free will by an enslaving elite 'consciousness' is entirely dependent upon the supporting role of the denied in maintaining such a power relationship of juxtaposing hidden denials. Guilt and fear led beliefs are not free willing and in this sense are not true of you as one worthy of being recognized and received. If such reception is anathema to who you feel and assert yourself to be, then you have no desire to embrace Life but only to deny it - and so you choose to meet your reflection as being unable to feel and know and share the relational Movement of Being Itself.

Don't be blinded by science. It is not more or less that a tool to serve the purpose given it. The purpose you give it or accept and share in by your own participance.

The Immune system, and the assumption of cancer

"But once again, cancer can evade them immune system without there being any deficiency in the immune system".

This belief that a healthy immune system is omnipotent against cancer and thus cancer can only be caused by an unhealthy immune system being just another example of a completely unchecked assumption made from nothing.

I responded to the above 'conversation' with the following perspective:

The mechanisms by which cancers seem to arise are many but have common elements. A fully and correctly  functioning immune system along with healthy nutritionally and mineral rich cell function is not something conducive to the development of cancer in the body.

Perhaps there are exceptions where cancers occur regardless of such conditions of balanced health - but such exceptions would prove the generality of the rule.

Cancer masks itself from the immune response and many modes of treatment work to unmask it while targeting the de-cloaked cellular anomaly to the function of immune response in destroying and expelling what is then recognized as not belonging or not self.

The assumption that cancer cells are some kind of independent power that has gone rogue or mutated to become a rogue element - is an exact reflection of the consciousness that makes such assumption. There ARE imprints of conditioning by which such narrative SEEMS unquestionable and unchallengeable. But the point of transformation is not battling with symptoms - but of uncovering the assumptive causes. If these are recognized and felt and known to be an 'unchecked assumption made from nothing' then the assumption is thereby NOTHINGED and something ELSE will take its place that is more aligned with who you truly feel and know - and are willing to accept and BELIEVE yourself to be.
If you're conditioning does not allow you to believe you are Life - then you accept the assumptive suggestions that you are something ELSE. Well - what is other than Life but death? Regardless how it presents itself to induce you to give Your Life to it!