Slow down, you move too fast!

in reply to

https://off-guardian.org/2019/06/16/speeding-into-the-void-of-cyberspace-as-designed/

This is an excellent witness to the deceits of the mind set against the knowing of the heart - that can only be felt or rise as awareness in silence of unconflicted being.

The mind gives power to the mind (thinking) and generates 'realities' of its own spin that effectively phish the identity of giving attention and focus there. Invested identity in the false and conflicting generates a 'negative creation' or anti-life experience of struggle against unified awareness as the expression of the wish-belief of possession and control.

While the human 'world' is an ever more complex defence/entanglement of debt and depletion set under the marketisation and weaponisation of 'possession and control' - it remains at root a mind-spin given power - or in old terms a false god (self or reality). However the only true release of a false god is in wholly attending and aligning in the true - while the temptation to deny, attack and hate the false is its secret source of fuel - because a negative attention is no less supportive to its reinforcement than a positive - and thus the 'politics' of polarised identity-entanglements is the battery or fuel cell from which to induce allegiance, conformity and compliance to the hidden framework of 'separation' or mind-dissociation in its own fragmentation.

Todays OG post resonates with my morning reading:

Inner Teacher: Today I want to tell you how to awaken from the dream. It isnt a mystery, and anyone can awaken when he is ready. He simply will not awaken  until then, but his time dreaming can be spent preparing himself to be ready. This  is the purpose of devotion. Devotion is willingly awakening to what has always  been true by leaving everything else behind.

Devotion is a slow process. I do not mean to say it will take many, many lifetimes  to wake up through devotion. I mean to say that devotion is a slow process now in every moment. It slows time by slowing the mind. And with practice,  experience becomes richer. You might liken it to enjoying a fullRflavored meal  more when each bite is taken slowly and held in the mouth while you enjoy the  richness of its flavor. This is how life becomes when the busyness of the mind is  absent and does not interfere.
The mantra will help to slow the mind and pull focus inward, which is devotion.  This is because the Heart is within, but the mind is without. When one is focused  on the Heart, one sees all things from within. One enjoys all experiences from a  point of certainty that is within. But when one is focused on the mind, one is  focused without. Without is a delusion of chaos made by staying without and  refusing to live from within.
So as you see, you do have a choice.
~ (Teachings of the Inner Ramana)

How does the mind terrorise (itself) into NOT slowing down and connecting?
By emotionally conditioned sympathy or antipathy or fear framed manipulation.
Regardless the 'science' of any assertion, its framing can be discerned by anyone who is awake to listen rather than already reactively invested.

The mind aligns in true function as the embodiment and expression of the heart of true or whole desire - which is the need to give, share or extend itself as the current or movement OF being - TO Itself.
Blocking function generates dissonance or pain such as to sooner or later ripen a crisis of awakened responsibility. The ingenuity of the mind in packaging toxic debt in complex instruments of seeming value or appeal is that of avoidance and delay. We are running out of time - and of consciousness - as a willing sacrifice to denial seen as power of possession and control. However, the deconstruction of the self-illusion serves its illumination AS a self-deceit (regardless the actors and agencies involved).

Looking Within AND Without as one - is the releasing of a spell or fixation in 'Without' - as the escape from conflict within. Conflict within is 'separation trauma' however packaged and presented to a narrative continuity of the will to persist in self-evasion' in the name of image and symbols of the true that thereby become hollow and destructive or life denying.

The drive to validate (or vindicate) our 'self' stems from a sense of self-lack pictured out in fig-leaf thinking in fear of exposure to truth - and renders 'truth' in terms or frame of illusion. Wholeness is not attained by division given power.

While much could be said about the development of an 'anti-life' sense of power from denial, it will mostly feed the fear of pain of loss of life rather than re-mind a re-membering as one with Life.
But it may be that until the cost of a mis-identification is truly FELT and known as an insanity or meaninglessness - it will not be released in the Call for sanity that is natural to being in dissonance.

Trying to 'wake the dead' is futility, but aligning in and attending the Living is the gift or release and being released of a futility. A living death is an unconsciousness of life under a substitution of thought, feeling and experience that is an identity or worldview. A golem or robotic set of reactive conditioning to systemic control set under tyranny of believed and perceived necessity or 'survival' under threat.

The true nature of the 'threat' needs to be re-evaluated from a willingness to accept healing (wholeness) - by which the simplest movement of curiosity finds answer that the most ingenious complexity cannot allow. The 'mind' would short-circuit or subvert this as the intent to frame itself as a directive to fix others perceived as lacking - instead of leaving the bait to such reaction hanging, and let the moment  and movement be from wholeness and gift wholeness. Regardless any addictive fixation in thinking. learn to give disregard for what no longer speaks for you or serves who you now recognize and accept yourself to be. You have this freedom as you give this freedom. But this releases the ILLUSION of possession and control to free willing - in place of manipulative overriding of the will by fear and tyrannous dictate that becomes systemic denial of all that truly Lives and Moves.

Why We Haven't Found Alien Life

One of the Best Explanations For Why We Haven't Found Alien Life

In commentary to the above article:

Rather than blindly operate current definitions and presumptions of “We” who have not - at least officially - found or been found in relationship with life beyond the confines of our Planetary sphere or indeed of our general dimensional identification in the temporal-physical plane... consider that within Infinite Consciousness, any definition will generate correspondence of reflecting reinforcement.

In order to open a more inclusive communication and relationship, look to the limiting and excluding factors in our personal and collective self-definitions - because what seems to be a fixed perspective by which to experience what we then call ‘world’ or ‘universe’ or ‘outer reality’ is in fact fluid, elastic and operating at frequencies of which we are generally, currently blocking - as a result of tuning in to a specific sub-set for specific purposes - that have characterized this particular facet of the the Human Experience. The current use of mind operates a blocking and limiting device for a segregative focus within body frameworks that deny or usurp the living communication through body.

One of the issues of expanding perspective from a narrowly defined exclusivity to a more universal and multidimensional appreciation is that of psychotic breakdown as a result of unprepared re-entry to Consciousness from a Newtonian sense of control over separate bodies or indeed ‘separate’ thoughts.

That communications are already operating between diverse facets and dimensions of ‘Life’ is simply always - whether recognized or not, but the human mind has learned to not see or recognize its integrality within wholeness in the belief-attempt to operate a discrete and separate identity.

Intimacy is not the bringing or rubbing of bodies together, yet communication of an intimately shared purpose of thought and feeling can be traumatic to an insistence in maintaining distance. Hence willingness and desire for communication is part of the re-discovery ad re-cognition of the ‘more’ of who you are and what Life Is.

Communication cannot be forced - and the matrix of thinking that passes as ‘communication’ operates a force-field of exclusion and denial. You are as alone as your identification dictates - and this is a choice though it seems an insurmountable conditioning.

Find (or be found in) the Life that you are - that is being all there is where ‘you’ seem to be, as a true and unwithheld presence. Now are you a point of presence that participates vibrationally instead of a conceptual fragmentation set in forms of conflicted denials.

Oh.. and we are all equally ‘special’ as a focal point of reflection and communication within All That Is. The gravitic catchment of self-specialness is in fact an incredibly weak ‘force’ that requires great compression of focus to operate within - but is then felt overwhelming within such ‘local’ perspective.

I write to your reflection - not to persuade. Have fun... if you will.

What if we are the 'bad guys'?

What If We Are The ‘Bad Guys?’
Irwin Ozborne, Contributor
Waking Times

The above article is specific to the USA and by extension to its allies - but my comment is applicable to the core patterning of identity that is implicitly conveyed in the header.

- - -

Look at the identities you accept - or project to others as part of your own.
Framing identity in terms of good and bad is a 'war on Self' for what and who you are is not decided or determined by your narrative of identification - but of course this is who you have come to believe yourself to be as a result of denying what you hate or fear within yourself and of defending and asserting what you present as if it is the whole or true of you.

A unipolar identity is not really open to relationship because it is only open to what agrees with it or extends what it already believes.

The globalism of a unipolar consciousness operates not only denial of the freewilling life of others - but its own - because it is locked into 'my way or no way' in the power struggle to come out on top. There is never a time when acquired or asserted power is enough - because any imaginable scenario of threat magnifies out of any possible disagreement or difference. Any communication is 'interpreted as power play'. Communication becomes impossible.

The insanity of this identification has to be recognized in order to be released in our own mind. It takes one to know one and power-envy along with vengeance is pervasive in the hatred of feeling powerless under others - but power itself is rarely self-revealing in its own terms, seeking to hide within presentations and narratives of acceptability and justification - indeed in self righteousness. This is not a mind-set of whoever happens to be embodying it. It is a pervasive mentality that operates as the core self belief and identity of the human condition-ing thus far un-healed.

A multi polar identity fundamentally accepts reality as a living communication in which identity arises as a gift of a shared purpose - for the dance within and between the polarities has a balance point in which one is true to oneself and through which can be truly in relation rather than seeking to resolve or work out internal contradictions in external terms.

The 'good cop/bad cop' device is the terrorizing influence of rage, hate and lovelessness, switching to a presentation of kindness and sympathy by which to 'escape' or hold at bay the now hidden terror - which is embedded in such a pact to be called on if overstepping fear's dictate.

The experience of lovelessness in rage and hate is indeed hateful and greatly disturbing - so much that we do our utmost to eradicate, escape and excommunicate it from ourself in the fear and hatred and distrust of the Other... and we become ourselves a loveless, hateful agency of what we deny on surface - excepting when 'justifiably provoked'.

The true Nature of Consciousness is reap and sow - or indeed give and receive. What you put in is what you get out. In giving hate or lovelessness of indifference to the experience of unrecognized parts of our Self, we set up a comeback in which we do not recognize our part in. I am not saying we are now to blame for the evils of the world including our own sense of being violated - but that it is within the range of our innate capacity to recognize denied self within experiences that seem to deny us - and in the moment of recognition is a shift of perspective that has been called grace.

I cannot change you or even persuade you of anything you are not already in the willingness to recognize as your own. I never have been able to exert power over you. But the complex play of fragmented and denied or split identity, sets up a disempowering belief in which others then seem more powerful as a result of a loss of power. Humanity has played this game to its conclusion - which is complete loss of power to the illusion of power. To the identifiction of power over Life or Existence.

Now is a choice. Identifictions within meaningless struggle for a power that can never truly fulfil, or the embracing of Life - regardless the messy involvement of denial coming up into awareness as every kind of hated or feared or despised (judged against) aspects.

Instead of branding 'evil' and living from self-justified hate - pause the judgement and listen or feel within for the Movement of your being - and you recognize the embrace of that which you can wholly embrace as having a core peace to it - which the desperate attempt to validate or enforce a partial sense over the whole or as the whole can never have - regardless the form it takes.

Through your willingness, discern the willingness of others and grow in the trust of your own feeling being - so as to be feeling and thinking, receptive and embodying, as a balancing of a wholeness that you already are but have not allowed to embody through you - while you think you alone (in whatever aspect is currently active) are in charge.

The need for enemy is the need for evil - over and against which to make an identity at odds with a wholeness. I am not saying there is not an evil arising from the denial and refusal of Life - but that its capacity to insinuate itself in your own thinking is deep set - and so you cannot trust your own thinking without pausing a moment or however long it takes - to feel the nature of where you are coming from and know that it is truly your heart's acceptance and your mind's purpose - as one.

Making mistakes is not failure, guilt, sin and shame, but is feedback without which you would be unable to grow. Growing in the embrace of Life is natural to the release of hate - and self-hate is the deepest and most divisive. That is why evil intent nurtures and leverages or triggers this in you at every opportunity so as to get you to think you are one of the good guys, while running its agenda through your split mind.

You are not one of the bad guys within any true recognition of Self no matter what roles have been enacted, but only the recognition brings that knowing. The forms of words can and are used to deceive - and so regardless of the words I have accepted for this communication - feel for your own discernment of what opens resonance and relevance to who you feel yourself to be at this timing of relationship and live from owning and knowing yourself integrally rather than as a 'power struggle' of authorities and contradictions.

It was not wrong to seek to make a unity of chaos - but now it is not wrong to listen to and abide in the chaos for insight and communication that was lost in the act of trying to conform it to limited ideas of what we - or anything - should be. There is a ripening for a fresh perspective. Revelation from what we have long judged against - because we are willing to listen with fresh curiosity. Indeed such is our need.

Down the Rabbit Hole

Professor Stephen Hawking claims black holes are gateways to mysterious alternative dimensions 

Clearly we have been and are already powering our 'consciousness' and society from such a power source and the vanity and arrogance that thought it could contain and control it is operating as a denial overlay of controlled masking narrative. It has feasting on human beings, and our home planet -which had been quarantined as a result as both a strait jacket and in a 'prime directive' to see if we would be able to awaken out of such a 'back door' hack, or 'take ourself down' - but not in a way that would be allowed to operate a contagion of informational energetic to the larger community.

So by this black-hole power we generate the conviction and its reflected experience that we are alone - and of course secretly enamoured of the 'power' to lord it over Life - redefining everything in terms of our 'alone-ness' as a world of 'object' rather than as an appreciation of relational wholeness communicating in all its parts.

An inner shift in Humanity is synchronous with the re-opening of communion - for higher level communication communicates as Feeling and Imagination - for the communication vortices are no longer blocked from consciousness. Hence unfolding 'discovery'.

Adam: (to the main article)All this proves is that even so-called scientists indulge in fairy story fantasies. If Hawking believes that it is possible to "travel through a black hole" then I dare him and other "scientists" with such similar views to climb inside a washing machine and put it on full spin cycle and then state whether it is possible to go through black holes (assuming they survive the spin cycle). A black hole would be a billion times worse than the spin cycle and you would be ripped apart molecule by molecule, atom by atom and subatomic particle by subatomic particle.   Data may survive but humans won't. Hawking should know that, instead of pandering to this mythological nonsense. 

  

Me:

If scientists didn't access imagination, you would have NO science. You're obvious and visceral hatred of myth no doubt has mythic roots in you. Humans can determine - in the main - when things are to be taken literally - until of course they lock on to a literal belief in a model and worship and conform all things to their one true model - regardless what form it takes.

You believe that you know you are a body and that is your notion of 'humanity'. well and good if it serves you.

I have a perspective of 'through a body, rather than in it or AS it - though without a 'spacesuit' of body and personality construct, one cannot participate in the focus of an individual human experience. The quality of being - by whatever name - that moves beneath the structure of meanings experienced is non-local. We have trained a 'mind' not to look there - not least with separation trauma which was not so dissimilar to your washing machine metaphor. Nothing survives its moment.

Meme: Linguistic redistribution

John Rappoport wrote a piece on 'memes':

Do memes exist? Or are they fictions?by Jon Rappoport

I wrote various segments into considering this idea. This is the first.

- - - -
Linguistic redistribution:

Szatz asked; does mental illness exist - and his answer was no. A relational conflict is not an organic illness residing in the body or brain of one individual - though the State can and does assert and impose 'treatment' on such peoples whose 'reality' does not fit, or who are induced to fit to a pathological 'reality' in order to 'treat' themselves. That doesn't mean there are not relational conflicts where communication breaks down and leaks out in behaviours including 'phyicalised' conditions that are then experienced without understanding their call, and their context.

The idea of autonomy or 'self-existing, self-creating, self-directing', is the idea of a thought separate from Mind or an individual separate from its relation. A 'me' of self-concept whose image is asserted to protect against loss of face, and loss of power, functions as differentiation within awareness that is consciousness of Existence through self-differentiation. Generating from conception; feeling, and perception, as experience of existence within All That Is - within the fact of being integral to All That Is - as an individuation of Infinity.

The idea of self is the same as the idea of god or soul, mind or spirit - it is the First before time and space from which all else derives as the embodiment of Self as self.
But Self without an object cannot know or feel or experience itself existing and does not will to be alone but goes forth and multiplies as the sharing of the knowing of being that IS expansion, creation, and evolution of Idea.

The idea in mind goes forth and multiplies - not because it has power in itself - but because You give it power of energy and attention - which is love. You therefore also give it meaning in terms of the purpose it serves you - and thus agree or choose to be bound by your own power along the lines of your own thought. Logic is not applied or 'added' to mind but inherent as it.

To be curious and to play in ideas of separation, is an 'as if' perspective. "What if I was different than I Am", and believe it with such force as to generate an experience unlike Full Open Communication"? And so 'creating' distortions that operate a limiting as a segregative sense of self - over and against the Fully Open Conscious Communication. Such idea then 'goes forth and multiplies' limitation, lack, conflict and threat in the name of a god of specialness, set apart and judging over.

The god that asserts itself and lords it over is not the First - but a derivative from an adulterated currency of Idea. However, it has all the power and meaning we give it - regardless of any form it takes. "An idea that is self-replicating' is simply a variation of "Look what you made me do!" - which is the victim play of a hidden mind in serious engagement in its own sense of self in conflict.

The reversal of Consciousness - where effects operate in place of true Cause, is giving power - the power of your acceptance of Will - to that which limits, denies and kills the Will.
How far down the rabbit hole of crazy is it your 'defined joy' to accept and endure?

Thank God for Richard Dawkins! It is remarkable that certain maggots can be used to cleanly and completely remove dead tissue in wounds that would otherwise be extremely open to infection.
There is much in the 'spiritual' bandwagon that 'adds' or overlays magical beliefs of association that may have roots in actual relational intimacies - but which pass on as currency of merely wishful and therefore weak, ineffective and divided thinking - which is very effective as false currency of adulterating and usurping the true relational felt quality of shared being.

So I see the linguistic construct of memes as part of the movement to invalidate or get rid of Consciousness excepting as conforms with the god who lords it by judging and asserting its judgement true - or in vernacular terms, 'controlling the narrative'. Fighting over the control of the narrative is always the pyramid of power - for power is upstream and here you get to look at mind-control because what is going on - in the Idea of Separation running 'as if' with great force - is... mind control. But who is fooling who?

In cartoons the characters can run off a cliff and don't have any problem until they look down.
The force of the imprinting of the separate self sense is a fragmentation that will not stop until there is a pause in which to notice or stir as a wakening of original being. There is a grace to the quality of such existence that is unspeakable.

But to anyone who now recognizes another foundation than conditioned self-survival thinking at the very core of their being - there is now a freedom to renew or rediscover the world and all abilities in it, to serve a fresh purpose - for the hateful that was hidden is 'outed' and recognized to NOT be who you are. This may be soon covered over in the reaction to the habitual momentum of conditionings that have not been not recognised and re-aligned with who you are - but the nature of the device of 'covering over'. itself becomes uncovered because you have a basis on which to challenge and question the belonging of such devices as your choice now.

The movement of mind-control includes its reactive shadow. It takes two to tango, and the idea, counter idea and transcendence is usurped by going upstream to 'win' rather than a true transcendent embrace of all perspectives as a result of true hearing and speaking. Full and open communication is NOT mind control - but the opening - to a mind-control perspective - of all the 'evils' it seeks to kill or hide.

But the rewakening of original being rises from another 'place' and brings another perspective within the same situation. Meanings are not set in stone - but nor is manipulating or rebranding the same old power trip to seem superior or knowing, amidst sown confusion, meaningful or honest.

The 'idea whose time has come' is not a specific form, being timeless it can use all forms for restoring true communication. The idea of conflict is always associating forms with asserted meanings that are not true - in order to play the game of judge and having the last word as your private mind.

The movement of a re-integrative Consciousness is not in separate individuals - for there is no such thing. Right relation is a creative dance of feeling and knowing yourself in relation to the other - not a mono-cultured homogeneity. This is feeling. Not emotionalism of suppression of true feeling but a quality of being, without which life is flat, featureless and may as well be a bunch of memes running in software loops on some machine that have no belonging in a Living Earth while so militantly denying Her Life. Our Life.

Upstream thinks its thinking is creative - incepting 'memes' and downstream takes the pain. If You Really Are First - then nothing can ever contradict you. Any alignment with original being brings this realisation Home. So contradiction means 'against your word'. Self-contradiction goes forth and memefies a war of cause on effect in which effects seem to fight back with a will of their own!

Wake up in a true idea that is truly shared. It's time is willingness, not circumstance. Has a time of willingness come? It's not just an idea - it is a living active call and receptivity to the movement of being - and faking or mimicking it becomes a self-betrayal that serves to not feel good. But at least you can still feel and move with acceptance of feeling to align more truly with who you know you are - without having to first define the form it takes, rather than persist a language of 'mindcontrol' by which to justify your denial in terms that deny your involvement in it. This 'anti-creative' power is using your own power against your Self while playing victor over victim and can only operate when we are not in our right mind; out of communication in dissociation believed real.

Reflecting the nature of thought in thought

Research Shows the Power Your Thoughts Have on Health and Longevity


The mind in definition is experiencing as it thinks - yet thinks it is experiencing events outside and other to itself - and in that model, thinking seems to be the surface or conscious PRIVATE act or fact of a sense of conflicted individual existence - for even such thoughts are conflicting - although the desire for continuity of focus within the model calls forth the weighting and shifting awareness in such thoughts so as to preserve a general sense of unity - but always over and against something or someone else.

These conflicting surface thoughts are in many ways a kind of reinforcement script to the wish and desire to a segregative experience because they effectively divide and rule by screening or keeping out what lies beneath - and beneath that; what truly knows itself being.

The word "I" can thus shift from a reactive expression of assertive blocking to a profound sense of being moved. Clearly they are not equal. One is defensive in the idea of conflicted self and the other is undefendedly free of the idea of self - so as to embrace and feel embraced by the living moment.
The defensive "I" is already fearful, hiding in fear and hiding fears, running away from its own conflicted thought in attempt to redefine or re-distribute the elements in such a way as to save its 'self' while rejecting and abandoning the rest.It does this in its own justifications and rationalisations of judgement that extend the pattern of its original separation trauma. It cannot 'do' anything else until the investment in persona wears down enough for the underlying already self-definitions and beliefs to rise to conscious awareness - which itself may be a fearful initiatory transitional identity.

Adding more thoughts on top of the conflicted "I" will serve nothing but the recognition it is not your true self. But uncovering the thoughts and beliefs that are already active but had been invisible or so lived from as to be unchallenged and un-noticed - is the crux of transforming them - which is not the engineering expertise of the ego working on itself - but a yielding what is being thought to the true of you. In place of asserting what is being thought at the expense of the full awareness of the true of you.

Bringing the Life to a CONCEPT or idol of truth is an act of reversal, denial and forgetting and loss - in concept held as Truth, felt as god, lived as real.
Bringing the concepts and beliefs that served self-image to the Living true, is to re-integrate who you thought you were with who you truly are - with the true movement and presence of being.
This then opens living from a different foundation. One cannot teach this in any terms of the false or conflicted sense without the liability of reinforcing the idea that what you truly are is something else or in some other moment that is to be achieved or reached. There - right there is the reversal by which thinking operates a preoccupation of elsewhen in place of presence - and seeks to make its home there.

Logic - this is NOT that.

Logic: how to introduce it and improve mush-minds

Jon Rappoport


I felt to join in a 'conversation' with what Jon Rappoport is saying:


Logic is consistency and congruency of thought but does not provide its own basis or foundation from which to automatically proceed or unfold itself.

Such a starting point may be an assertion or stated definition or belief that can take the form of a foundation - while already being in contradiction.

"This is that" or false association is the minds capacity to imagine meanings that reflect its own wish to override, distort, exploit and re-frame Felt and Shared Relational Meaning as a sense of power to invoke a private mind-dream upon Shared Mind-Stream (Communication Itself) and reconfigure such mind in emulation to project and externalize its denials and interpret them as world to be likewise manipulated, exploited, usurped.

Imagination without integrity is conflicting purpose. Mind Itself is another term for without limit but thought that is not directly extending the Qualities of Mind is self-contradiction. The law of Mind is its unqualified nature and never in fact defined by any framing perspective within thought by which to use 'As If' to replace 'As Is'. What Is - Is and what Is, is as it is - but can be experience infinitely - which includes experiencing it as it is Not as an effect of holding focus and desire in definition that is untrue of What and Who you are as the awareness of existence; a unique expression of the movement of Being in the act of creation that is integrally part or and one with Every other likewise unique expression of Existence - within a richness or multidimensional interrelated that is both the wholeness (Non Local) AND the specific (Local) at Once - with every instant being a wholeness of integrality clearly felt and received and shared - or mis-taken within the lens of a falsely or incompletely asserted self-definition.

The ability to differentiate in thought within and seemingly from Awareness, is a power to forget, cover over or Not Know, (that you are knowing) is part of the movement of segregative consciousness. Implicit to initiating such movement is the reintegrative movement of coming back into your right (whole) Mind - as Is. The interplay of shifting focus in these apparent polarities of possibility and probability is Experience. But the nature of the Integrative movement is a higher, more embracing perspective of synchronicity... presence - as is.

'What you give out is what you get back' is also a law or unalterable nature of Mind - and regardless any form of expression, its foundation is your reflection. So it can be said as 'where you are coming from is where you are experiencing yourself to be'. Coming from or embodying an idea of conflicted self-definition must result the reflection of conflicting relation or world.

So the experiencing of a self-conflicted dissonance is a result or effect of taking a definition of self and allowing it to run instead of the Mind that is your source and nature - for your own reasons.

But the law of mind as it applies to a false foundation projects itself out as a split off logical extension of denial and denied-ness, that operate in the active but disguised suppression and avoidance of  dissonance-guilt, dissonance-terror, dissonance-rage - and so forth - so that a self-focus can be 'born' within but temporarily unconscious of a deeper imprint conditioning that generates the framing of its world or life experience.

The willingness or grace of noticing and releasing of the false is the stirring or rising of and honesty or undefended awareness of being that recognizes what it is NOT as NOT true and not available or in any sense meaningful to accept, use, focus within, value, identify with or against or persist in giving attention and investment to. The natural movement of being simply operates clearly to a free attention and is recognisably Life - not conceptualizable forms of derivative impressions and association by which to assert or claim a mind of one's own - over (any symbolic or conceptual image of) Life.

This Movement of being is the capacity of discernment - for the acceptance of what is truly resonant and relevant to who you in this instant know and feel yourself to be, illuminates all that is incongruent or dissonant to you within the light of an awareness of a relational wholeness of being - that in simple terms is the call to joy - but as the unfolding or your own unique receiving and giving of wholeness, fulfilment, appreciation, and gratitude.

The Movement of (the focus) of being within the Infinite or edgeless and open quality of wholeness is the restoring of imagination as the true expression of an integrity of embrace - and the healing of a split off sense of self-hatred that was fed by denial and given power by fear to rage demoniacally in an unwatched mind.

This is a sketch in word-meanings of a willingness to open/share perspective of a Living Movement of being. The word-meanings can never substitute for the willingness - excepting a wish to seem to be who or what I am not - for my own reasons. That is - for reasons that can be uncovered and enquired of in simple curiosity to be found revealing of something that serves me in a way that I can now accept, release and move on from or 'put behind me' by the simplicity of embracing what I prefer rather than being defined by what I do NOT want.

Science and Experiential Consciousness

A Brain On LSD Looks Like A Psychotic Brain, Says New Study

A brain on LSD looks a lot like a psychotic brain. Earhart-Harris says that these images of a brain on LSD look a lot like a brain right before a psychotic episode. In both cases, neurons that used to work together start firing out of sync, and neurons that normally wouldn't work together suddenly do.

A brain on LSD is self-absorbed. The scans showed that the electrical activity of the brain slowed down substantially, mimicking the sorts of wave patterns doctors see during visual hallucinations. This led the team to believe that a brain on LSD is "tethered more to the internal than to the external world."

I love that phrase 'internal world'. Whatever the 'external world' is, any capacity to participate 'IN' it - in character, as it were - is dependent on a range of events of aligned purpose.
Is 'inner world' a direct experiential communication of such purpose? - but mis-perceived when experienced and conformed to the framework of artificial outer-world 'unity'.
LSD can open experiential perspectives preverbally of many aspects of multidemensional Cosmology - which is why the stories of tech innovators using it (including micro dosing) to open insight that can contribute to the frontier of rapidly innovating evolution of tech.
However, there are other similar and more natural substances including DMT which is secreted in the pineal gland - is it not - as a matter of course?
The realm of Consciousness is of course the realm of inherited psychic and emotional CHAOS - that a large part of the surface mind (external reality) seeks to LIMIT and CONTROL. Indeed there are suggestions that the brain is a Limitation device - although that also allows a very particular focus within Everything At ONCE!
But accountable controllable reproducible conceptual theory maps and models are already setting a range of parameters that filter and distort what can be 'found'.
Coming back to the idea of purpose, the 'what for' - as far as science is concerned is simply persistence (survive and procreate). Coupled with the sanctioned purpose of prevailing to procreate and persist - we have the exact basis for the psychopathic financial and corporate globalism that scientists probably are not perhaps aware of - being somewhat focussed in their (scientific) tools or specialities.

I'm not averse to ANY discipline serving a true Humanity - (which I regard as inherently purposeful) but the accretions of scientism around true scientific curiosity and endeavour has accumulated a particular ignorance and arrogance. Perhaps some exposure to experiential and somewhat chaotic 'reality' is missing in modern scientific careers?

PS - because of the imprint of terror, guilt, fear and shame that is pre-loaded as part of the human template - in various ways and degrees in various individuals. The 'regression' or exposure to the primitive or infancy states of consciousness is EXACTLY where the trigger for psychosis activates, and psychosis is one of many strategic reactions to the trigger state. A key insight being that the attempt to CONTROL reflects immediately as a CHAOS that then escalates and reinforces the need and justification FOR control. This 'control mentality' then becomes the protector of the 'war against terror'. If perspective is not regained the mind splits or fragments - and attempts to unify the sense of personal control grows the capacity to operate as 'a cohesive unit' out of many conflicting purposes or 'realities'. All of this is already reflected and study able as our world - but is not connected with inner 'reality' - while the non-physical or non local is discarded, rejected and filtered out - because its acknowledgement implicitly illuminates arenas of dependence that the control mentality finds insulting or a trigger to rage and a desire to manually replace it with its OWN systems.

Suddenly the blind can see

The Blind Woman Who Switched Personalities And Could Suddenly See

Fragmented or dissociated consciousness is the NORMAL but not the Natural state of Humanity for all of our known or mythically portrayed history.
There are many variants on how this expresses but coping with an overwhelm of conflicting pain is the common elements in every 'mind' that is effectively a psychological defence rather than an open flowing channel of spontaneous and creative expression.

In reports by Dr Fenwick on the dying process recently on ConsciousTV, he reported that it is not unknown for those with severe limitations - such as paralysis or dementia - to briefly be restored to a wholeness of capacity and lucidity that is medically infeasible... immediately before dying.

Likewise there are very many 'spontaneous' remissions or healings and reversals that do not fit the orthodox model of a materially caused, controlled and limited existence.

On the darker side there are examples of the study and practice of mind-control that work by fracturing and splitting consciousness - deliberately - toward being able to make programmable 'fragments' or 'Manchurian Candidates' that can be self erasing after performing a set role or task.

The study of Consciousness for increasing leverage and control over others is where the big money employs psychology - but that is already the fruit of a fragmented and fragmented purpose or mind.

Waking up to a direct relationship as Consciousness in Expression - regardless whatever filtering or distortions are currently in effect - is the stirring or Movement of an integrating wholeness that realigns and heals the patterns of conditionings that have not really grown, evolved or changed over millennia - but persist in changing forms.

This technological and global intent to leverage power now extends into the molecular and genetic level of our biology,along with AI - and with the same warlike intent to force reality to fit our image - only it is not 'our' image but the dominant image asserted and imprinted by those who own and control the world in ways we simply cannot imagine - or intuit but fearfully project from the original imprint that fragmented us.

While the blind seeing again is applicable literally in the above case - the direction I would point toward is using this literality to extend to Soul-awareness - which is what I feel Jesus often means when he talks of raising the 'dead'. For to live without our wholeness of being is to live protected from the pain of such separation. Technology has been used to help cope with the results of lovelessness and powerlessness - hence the search for both and the bitter sense of betrayal when our life in the world denies us or robs us - even of the little we have.

The idea of going upstream in Consciousness or to relax beneath the mind of the personality level is also the 'look Within'. All of our masking persona operates a way of NOT looking within - for beneath our presented self is a morass of psychic and emotional pain and rage and paralysis.

I sense that if we do not actively live in a way that attends the evils in the day thereof, then they pile up and render us prey for those who would for whatever reasons of their own - lead the blind. Perhaps they are guiding and protecting us. Perhaps we are being pharmed. Perhaps we are being fractured over and over so as to use our denials for covert or hidden agenda.

The light and the dark are both choices - but to the need to hide or NOT see, the dark may seem to be the protector or saviour.

Regardless of any rational communication or indeed any extension of communication, one cannot reach to that which actively does NOT want to see or hear. But to whoever has eyes to see and ears to hear - our Lives Already ARE in communication - whether we have conscious awareness of this in such terms of not. Because Life is One in All - and All are in One Indivisible - of which everyone and everything is an individual Expression. This means nothing at the level of an fragmented perception - and Everything at the level of Soul - which contains all levels within it - even the ordinary moment of reading this.

PS I also saw some of
Meir Schneider - 'My Life And Vision' - Interview by Iain McNay
I will come back to this - but has particular relevance to restoring lost or blocked functionality - and in this case vision.

Can the secret mind explain its existence?

Secrets of the Mind: Can science explain consciousness?
From iai.tv

My comment:

Can anything 'explain' consciousness?

The seeming question is a conceptual statement positing a something that acts to define and account for prior awareness in terms of concept that it manufactures. This is circular reasoning or indeed talking to oneself as if one is not in fact oneself but a proxy conceptual supposition through which a self reflecting model can be experienced as a modification of consciousness that is  in no way shape or form actually achieving  or acting anything outside of consciousness.
However as a working model, awareness is focused within and through concept of self and that which is rejected by the selection within totality operates as unconscious oppositional sense of identity and will.
The apparent struggle within what seems a split mind results in a world of experience in which imposition and opposition reinforce each other while assertion of control defines itself ever more negatively against feared or denied and unrecognized self. And that assertion of denial is received and reflected as oppression, compression and death - the inability to experience movement within consciousness. Which is the counterpart shadow to a falsely presumed ability to operate as an autonomous and self-defined concept within a totality of what consciousness actually is. The error is the idea of consciousness distinct and outside of feeling - a non feeling mind. Disconnecting thinking.

Feeling - in its true sense - does not need to explain or analyze anything to know That it is as it is, and experience itself in and as ever new perspective - because feeling in its true sense is the primary quality of receptivity that attracts and forms a focusing of attention and desire within itself, that then extends to reflect as idea through which to know itself Life - in relationship - as movement - as creation.

What is defined and accepted as consciousness in general human terms is an inverted exclusion of creation - in which an effect, assigns itself cause - as its own creation and consequently asserts an interpretation as its own distorted and filtered experience as its mind and its determination of world outside its defined 'consciousness'.

An interesting reversal of the reversal would be to ask, "Can Consciousness explain science?" Although the term explain is not native to Consciousness and so its original term would be, "Can Consciousness illuminate, embrace and know, science?". I suggest that nothing that is but is at its Original Quality of being, unconditionally loved - that is, illuminated, embraced and intimately known.
What kind of science would be conducted in conscious acceptance and embrace of the Movement of Being - rather than as an arrogant ignorance that seeks to make of Life a slave?

If words are not felt - they are not connecting to anything but thought. The assertion that they find justification in application is a cover for persistence in denying the felt quality of Existence. Heart and Mind are in truth an indivisible magnetic/electric vibrational expression of Infinite Perspective. A temporary shielding of totality individualizes the One as the Many - but the Many are the One.
At the perspective of individuality Idea accepted and extended through, reflects experience. There is no separation in true creation of idea (or definition) and experience - and the knowing within experience of self-awareness 'that it is Good' or truly reflecting. But in concept of a separating and segregating sense of self is a fragmenting experience in which the conscious focus within such act is lost to the overwhelming experience of being defined and conditioned by ones own unrecognized act in concept. The residual attempt of the mind to judge, determine and create for itself operates an exclusion zone, an elitism of private agenda operating beneath many layers of defence and justification.
It victory over Life is of course death. The reduction of life to explanation is the suppression of the very Movement of Life unless operating within a truly heartfelt, passionate and self transcending movement of Life!
Consciousness: By their fruits shall you know them - and they shall know themselves.

Law and disorder

The Great Common Law
A Daily Bell serializing of 'Production and Plunder' by Paul Rosenberg. This section looks at Magna Carta and the Common Law and more...

- - -

I see opposing perspectives in human relations. Each sees the evil in the other but doesn't recognize its own reflection.
The imposition of coercive 'law' or definition, arising from mis-identified self concept in fixed idea, oppresses, subjugates and denies the will - the movement of response. The feelings are by nature receptive and reflective and hence reflect this oppositional force as grievance within survival instinct beneath which is its core movement of the need to be accepted and not denied. A Splitting into mind based and feeling based identities.
These split minds, relate or rather - fail to relate - through forms of communication breakdown that sets as conditioning of precedent by which a template is formed from which forms crystalize to fixed meanings, that persist the patterning of the original error in all that comes forth.

Identity in self-Concept denies freedom to evolve, grow and change - being a SET idea of how anything and everything "must" be. the shadow of the seeming light of such assertive consciousness - goes forth as a communication of inadequacy, fear, guilt, anger and powerlessness UNCONSCIOUSLY and is reflected in forms reflecting what is actually done and not merely what is said or asserted as true.

The causal in this is the spiritual acceptance of image or concept as substitution filter over the Living Self - which inherently or implicitly reflects a denial or opposition and undermining of self-image - and justifies and reinforces the cycle of righteous assertiveness over reflections it cannot tolerate or recognize itself in.
Yet with the honesty of breakdown comes the willingness to re-evaluate EVERYTHING from the very beginning - and this willingness for integration, healing and indeed joy uncovers false sense of self in concept - whose release allows the acceptance of the feedback that is needs from what it previously sought to control.

Consciousness is always the template reality from which manifestation follows, but attention exclusively focusing within its own thought becomes conditioned to identify within its terms as if trapped in its own dream/nightmare. Until and unless it opens true balance within itself rather than persisting in imposing an inbalances order that propagates disorder.
The split off feeling has an imprint of terror and yet must find its way to move through this to find the acceptance without which is all feeling consciousness lost, presence denied and death embraced or indeed compelled.

That was an attempt to sketch something that might stir a resonance. For the governance we operate within or upon our own consciousness is our reflected experience For a start we can recognize assertive righteousness as a mask overhate and choose not to join in and strengthen mutually agreed definitional structures that thrive on hate - whilst honestly feeling hatred and finding what is really in it.
Who wants to start embracing their negative and denied feelings when there are so many perfect scapegoats upon which to 'get rid of it'? (Whichever side or whatever polarised position one identifies within).
Only those in whom an honesty of being stirs from being deeply troubled.
A true and trustworthy quality and process of communication is the only basis for establishing just or indeed sane relationships. The conceptually oriented deny all emotional communication excepting where it affords leverage to outcomes of control. The emotional distrust and aversion to stepping forth into an arena of communication by which they are persistently invalidated and denied is very deep seated.

As for determining just outcomes; every situation is a unique circumstance. Nothing really ever happens twice - excepting one narrows reality down to an extremely tiny focus within fixed forms. the form in and of itself is not the reality - and manipulators know that and use it to make anything seem to be anything. Discerning the Spirits is a receptive quality that is innate - but which tends to be covered over and invalidated. yet discerning the Spirits is the means by which one navigates and rises out from an insane complexity that resulted from an originally simple error. You are not who you think you are, and are free to discover what you are in willingness to open to an honesty of  feeling and safely allow a visceral and energetic communication to occur.

Facts to meaning - or Meaning to facts?

Comment arising from:
From facts to meaning, through beauty
by Deepak Chopra

- - -

The Idea of Science operates a mind that gathers data to construct a model of reality that holds and reinforces the same inherent 'meaning' as the mind that thus seeks.
For such a 'mind' is inherently regarded as separated from its experienced 'world' of objects and thus free to act upon it, manipulate and exploit, map and define and control it.
Originally this arose from confusing a sense of dominion over nature that is inherent to the Creator level of Consciousness, with the 'mind' or personality construct of the central character in its script of unfolding experience.
While the Creator-Spirit identifies in character, that one is as one asleep - who knows not what he does.
Yet the Fact of Awareness of Existence is immutable - regardless the unfolding or expansion of idea as experience.
The illusion of power always costs the awareness of the power of illusion - that is the power of Idea accepted, believed, experienced and identified as reality by the mind that thus thinks.
Awareness of Existence operates through differentiation and desire to create unique and infinite reflections of Meaning. The core qualities of such Meaning include Beauty, Truth, Love, Joy, Peace, Reason, Justice. Such are the fruits of the Spirit of Wholeness.
A divisive, possessive, and coercive identifiction with the image, symbol or form of any of the Qualities of Existence redefines such qualities in its own image - as through a falsely limiting framing by which things seem to be self-existing entities.
Such modification of a symbolic representation of Awareness of Existence Itself, is an overlay by which Original knowing is filtered out, obscured and distorted.
When an moment of Transcendence of such identifiction is shared or gifted, there is a shift from the limited and limiting 'mind' to a direct experience.
Awareness is exactly coincident with its experience. There is no separation. This may seem the loss of one's power to 'become' a someone in one's own right - and all the hopes and desires that go with it, but is the restoration of an Embracing Perspective to that which struggled in idea of the imposture of rejection and exclusion.
Science operates on a material or external world that inherently rises from the rejection of the Spirit or Wholeness of an undefended Open Consciousness.
The nature of such rejection is a deceit by which to seem to be defending against un-chosen and unwarranted threat. Thus the split into conscious and un-conscious compartments - not in matter - but in meanings accepted, believed and asserted in reaction.
Science can serve as a technologism of weapon, shield and strategem for the segregating sense of self, or it can serve a love of truth in honest and undefended opening to the ALREADY true.
In war truth is whatever one can assert and pass off in order to support a private agenda.
In truth there is no war.
How can there be no war in the face of such experience as we take for the human condition?
By recognizing the deceit of self-attack, upon which is raised the seeming self of a split-minded struggle.
Within the perspective of struggle - all is war, but of seemingly varying degree. To the perspective of Wholeness or Peace - we but do this unto our selves.
The reality of the 'other' cannot be discovered but through your own. In another you meet your split-minded reflection in an alloy of alliance and rejection OR you meet the freedom to be That which you are - without first defining what you are in terms OF exclusivity and rejection.
Science, re-aligned to serve an integrating wholeness, supports and reflects the Qualities of Awareness of Existence. We are not personae in fragmentation, but channels of Creative Expression. There is no way to communicate the latter to the former what so ever. Let beauty and joy restore a unified Experience - and use that perspective to act from - instead of attempting to stuff the New Wine into old paradigms.

Is there anyone... in here?

Using Disqus forum software, I get emails with invitation to join discussions.
This was one such:
Is there anyone Out There?

I added the following proesy :

Is there anyone... in here?
Be assured that your beliefs about yourself - the core definitions from which and by which you live, are operating as a filtering and distorting lens to your experience of a Living Universe of multiversity that you are not in any way shape or form separable from - except in concept.
The alien is otherness and 'the other' is the unrecognized self or it would not be a UNI verse, but a chaos without even the possibility of knowing itself chaotic.
"Out there", is a special or very specific way of experiencing facets of Consciousness as separate and external to you who are thus defined as a walled off consciousness seperated by space and time from Totality, so as to have the experience of a lifetime within an ignorance of Totality, but which carries the spark of awareness that can recognize Itself in 'others'. or persist as if it is all alone (and hint: a power unto itself).
ET's - include other variations of humanity. But the capacity to let anyone else into our awareness is not merely a physical confluence for no one will let another into their heart unwilling - but will SEE the justifiction for withdrawing and withholding - including NOT seeing what is otherwise in open sight.
In arrogance and ignorance we generally presume 'advanced' to mean technologically developed, not recognizing the embodiment of ignorance of subtler cooperative communications of resonant synchronicity that operates as a jamming signal to such communication. Nor the arrogance of asserting a coercive will upon our Planetary Consciousness (Ourselves) as if our agenda is meaningful or serves the flowering of Life as the infinitely rich creative expression of Planetary Consciousness.
So in a sense it is the human of Terra that is the alien - even within Home Planet. Who has no clue that his particular version of consciousness is an inside out and upside down reversal, and so is gently shepherded and supported in reintegrating to wholeness through every true willingness shared.
The fear-agenda of the belief in a disconnected and unsupported consciousness will be and is being shifted by ANY disclosure of Life beyond the boundaries that symbolize and maintain 'isolation'. Do ET's and Universal communication break through the eggshell? - or is it the Rebirth of Awakening Planetary Consciousness breaking it from within? That depends on perspective. For both are the movement of One impulse.
I enjoyed writing this. You may use it or lose it in line with what is resonant and relevant to your own themes, needs and desires. Truth is not determined or decided by what we believe - but belief can and does limit, distort and deny us a clear and true perspective of All That Is - as it is. Until we can regain a capacity to actually - and I mean intimately, communicate an integrity of being, it is unwise to operate an Open House Policy - for we will simply frighten ourself by attracting what resonates to a fearful vibration (regardless we mask it in delusional dissociations). But individually, we are Individuated expressions of Consciousness - which has local and a Non local facets both operating as one - but as I say, we have focused exclusively within the local, for our own reasons of exploration and discovery.
Well, how are you finding the experience of a physical Planetary embodiment thus far?
I trust you have not invested in 'taken-for-granted-ness', because to sleep through such a marvel is - a sort of marvel in itself - to anyone watching, if not to the sleeper.
Stories and pictures connect us with Higher Mind, if we let them.
Consciousness is the Frontier that finally brings us to our beginning and space is full of energy and information that is of a greater Consciousness of which we are a part and not apart from - although of course one is free to experience that as well. The thinking mind is an incredible tool, but remember to put it down and check in with whether it is in fact called for.
A book I love states: "There is no life outside Heaven". But where you choose to look for meaning is up to you. If one thinks outside the box, the boxers will think you a lunatic - and that is essential for the box in which to think alone.

'staberdearth' responded to my writing with:
Not much comment for this. Learn how to express what you mean. This above is all stilted. Somewhere in there I am sure that you have a point.

That's a comment.
I mean every word. Or rather I have consciously accepted every word to convey the meaning. We all have a point of view. Mine is not asserted but invitational. Opinion is not so much a point of You as an identifiction of thoughts. One can say that such an identity is an experience of oneself as a point of view - but always framed in oppositional terms.
Is there life out there and if so - would communication be possible?
This is posited on the presumption there is life - shall I say 'down here' on Earth - or indeed 'in here' in terms of general beliefs as to where it Is. You may think that a self-evident fact - but is there life in your movie, tv or screen 'realities'? Is there life in automatic or conditioned programming of mechanism that mimic life?
So part of my point is that the assumption from which we ask are already a conclusion. including what is exactly meant by 'we'.
Just as life is not defined or contained in form, so questions can in fact be statements or reinforcements of belief, expressed in the form of a question.
'What is the purpose of life' is already operating a mentality that defines life and purpose as separate and different.
My main point here is to invite a deeper curiosity for where we are 'coming from'. be that thinking or the communications and actions that automatically proceed from thinking. There - that's a synchronicity! The thought is where a creative living event arises, and the structural expression and development and fulfilment of that thought expresses as an experience of the fulfilment of that thought. There is a saying in the Bible not to attempt to put New Wine (metaphor for Life) into old bottles (existing or old paradigm structures of identity and control).
I have learned to express what I consciously accept as meaning that shares rather than made up meanings that jam the signal to operate a private world - an all alone world. But of course this makes no sense to a wilfully private and controlling mentality - and that is as it should be.
My feeling is that if something stirred enough to comment at all... then there is at least something that you  feel within yourself as a result of meeting me here, and that is yours and not my 'doing' so much as a serendipity or synchronicity of life. No one can receive or perceive what they are not the vibration of.
My sense of the 'advanced' or multideminsional nature of  more inclusive consciousness than our current level of balance, is that it would be overwhelming to us (Terrans), not by intent, but by a lack of resonance and grounded stability. And so there would be the polarising duality of seeing as gods and giving all our power away - or as demons and believing all our power has been taken away.  Doesn't this pattern already reveal itself as the pattern of life on Earth as being lived within our already existing system.
However... the discovery - and disclosure (important point) of even microbial life beyond our Planet will Shift our identity - for indeed we are NOT alone - and that foundation of a thought system that has reinforced itself in almost endless questions over millennia - will give way to a capacity for a quality and capacity of Communication that our physically conditioned program could not incorporate - yet it will not be denied or negated but integrated.
I am happy for this to be a made up story that doesn't have to be proved or disproved in the empiric or socially reinforced sense of true to convey information that resonates a Humanity awakening.
As above  - so below - if our template is corrupted so as to give a stilted 'above' then our 'below' will faithfully reflect that. The "moneylender in the Template" is the idea of 'middleman' between life and its purpose. To be 'on purpose' is a wholeness of congruency and alignment. Technological overreach amplifies conflicted purpose - which is magnifying purposelessness.
If you were able to serve the restoring of sanity to those who don't even recognize their own insanity, would you?
Is it enough to imagine and not deny the possibility that there are those of greater awareness than our current sense who do serve - but not so as to undermine our own awakening self responsibility.
Somewhere in all this is the point of Everything. For when we miss the point we mistakenly generate 'points of view' that reflect a sort of pointlessness, that then we struggle to make meaningful. Rather than relax 'back' as it were into the point we forgot when we engaged in such struggle - which as you know, is very easy to start and seemingly hard to put down - such that it becomes our identity and we cannot 'see' any other possibility.
Humanity needs renewed vision, not re-branding of the same old storyline. This means stretching our minds and abiding in what we don't yet understand without forcing it into the 'old paradigm'. Not because we should - but because it is a true desire - albeit stirred awake by some sense of 'running out of rope' for the old identification. Everything has all the meaning You (in totality and not just in act)  give to it. Not more. But never less. But this speaks to the heart of a true connectedness and not the mind that seems to manually spin alone.


- - -

To another commenter on this main discussion topic who said:

Hmm, I'm relatively new poster for Disqus forums so far I'm afraid many of the topics I've been commenting on tend to be a bit more controversial and perhaps not ripe for this kind of comic format.

With that said, there is one discussion where one might could draw enough good quotes to make a similar comic, but I'm not sure.

"Ask Your Neighbor: Do you care what others think about you?

I reply:

Do we ask our neighbour? Or do we ask someone who we have already 'made up' with what we think they think of us as well as believing they are what we think they are?

Do people think about me?
A: Not a lot! Though most everyone thinks about their own 'me' constantly.

Controversy is a baited hook until one is ripe for a kindness of cosmic format.
If I let what others think about me matter, I would censor and disallow my true presence in order to please what is not true of me. On a nip-picky note - 'about me' is not me - so I would rather join in shared purpose or willingness that find contractual agreements of reinforcement for the story of 'me'.

Framed in Darkness; opened to Light.

Astrophysicists inching closer to the physics truth about black holes

I sense a correspondence with the segregative identity and the paradigm of gravitic material separateness. Whereas the 'Electric Universe' restores perspective as an integrative identity of informational energy exchange within a Unified Event.
Mechanically speaking, the segregative identity operates a 'forgetting' device within 'Light' as a 'darkness' within which to operate exclusive local perspective - which is the idea of consciousness as 'power over' or coercive will.
Whilst I am expressing from an intuitive sense here, the idea of power to discern, define, discover and reflect is the idea of consciousness which IS the reflection and extension of focussing awareness through Idea.
The sense of separate consciousness is a construct, no less within Consciousness, in which All That Is , is experienced 'as if' apart from and outside of Self Awareness.
However, such experience is transformed and transcended in a reintegrative appreciation of 'as is'. Truth does not require complex thinking to maintain ideational constructs of identity, because the instant of existence is already a perfect demonstration of All That Is.
Thinking is thus released from defence and reaction to serve the signature joy of being - which is our unique 'creational unfoldment' of reflection and extension of The 'Universe Knowing Itself' as the totality of richly interacting facets. Including the capacity to perceive and believe ourself separate and self-determining within an experiential model of NOT-self. And give an exclusive priority to interpretation that can be coerced or co-opted into providing continuity for such model.

Faith in Life!

Monsanto Laments Dwindling Faith in Science

Following on from the last entry, because someone addressed my comment thus:

Praetor commented:

You, speak of Soul and the Physical Biological World, that be the reason we are all here, how to live in solid physical world, while having a soul (spirit) and making it work, can it be done, that is the question? The answer to that question, TIME will tell. The two are separate and are now one, can the two be one or should they remain separate. I surmise, that is the great experiment, can they be one? The soul requires only peace and love, the physical requires everything nature can provide (food, water, air, sleep, rest and everything else to stay alive), so the higher mind has set in motion, where we are, and the out come is up to us, to make it work, will we make it work???

I speak of Consciousness. Consciousness OF physicality is part and parcel of BELIEVING and experiencing ourselves as a separated "mind" within a body within a physical universe of bodies. That one CAN experience and identify as this separated persona is evident. But no one is IN such a world any more than a wish can replace truth.

The notion of 'separateness' operates the lens darkly by which to experience a reversal of consciousness. However, there are limits to the ability or capacity of believing and identifying in the untrue. Pain and meaninglessness being chief among them.

Thinking without true relationship is a disconnected thought-mind - but mind is not, can not, will never, exist as an actually independent entity. While such thinking asserts its 'self', there are no ears to hear.

Whatever Life Is, already is, and is working perfectly. Each of us and all of us together are our own 'experiment' or theme of experience and exploration.

The nature of consciousness itself is integral to my experiential relationship and discovery. It is of course my joy or natural calling - along with the embodiment of an integrated consciousness. It is all a matter of perspective.

When ideas run - or are accepted into your mind, they are experienced as perception. Regarded as reality and then reacted to and acted upon as if true. By the power of your acceptance do ideas run in your mind. Fear usurps the mind but only while you give it the power to do so.

Will you - regardless of what anyone else chooses - choose to align with what you resonate most honestly as true of you in relevance to your current experience? I suggest that although this could be seen as a matter of time, it is truly a matter of willingness.

Holding onto a mistaken investment is like supporting a lie, for it costs the joy of a true movement of being, in which Soul reveals itself evident as Living Context rather than being demanded in sacrifice to a 'blind god'. Identity is investment. But to release all things to Source is to BE identified perfectly. One cannot bring love into fear but as sacrifice to fear's 'reality', but fears can be brought to love in willingness FOR Perspective.

It is all a matter of perspective - and that the choice to assert and coerce is the limiting and losing of perspective. Of course there is another way. But until there is a willingness, it does not appear. To find willingness, one may have to first honestly acknowledge and own one's wilfulness or unwillingness. There is fear, pain and anger in guilt that invalidates Life. There is a messenger here to be received. One never meets 'the world' but through one's own psycho-emotional-physical construct.

The opposite of blind (private agenda) coercive manipulation of Life is yielding (private agenda) into Life.

One cannot serve two masters of opposite and exclusive directions.

Faith in Life is implicit, the instant one recognizes the false as false, for the true stands evident and in that knowing is it simply obvious one IS Life and not somehow 'outside and apart and acting upon it'.

You cannot experiment UPON yourself who Are One Self. But you can engage in conception and perceive idea in which fear seems to split or fragment such a consciousness. Isolate and alone. But how could such a game of powers be played without rival, adversary, ally and enemy?

"It's Life, but not as we know it Captain".

Perhaps the 'third eye' is our true front ear. And 'space' is not 'out there after all, but reflecting an embracing awareness of All That Is. Time serves the unfolding script. But time is running out for the script to remain hidden. Does mon santo mean 'my holy'? Is that not the error in identification in a nuts-hell? For what you give (idea) is what then gives you. 'Thy holy' is a willingness to honour and acknowledge the presence of Life in Creation - that appears perhaps to be a world outside you. Do this 'just because' and not in order to 'get', and you will simply align with the true of you - and have the reflection.

Integrity is true relation.

Psycho-logical

 

Comment to an article on op-ed news:The Psychological Moment We are In

One can appeal for validation by extending the presumption of 'we' statements, and this is part of the way the self definition works to select and reflect the world that validates it.
The world is consciousness as extended or projected - and reflected. What one is actually projecting ONTO or UPON cannot be experienced without some self-definition relative to it.
Psychology tends to posit its study within a materialistic model of external cause to an internal defence mechanism - of 'self' or ego or even learned (programmed/evolved) behaviours.
So the 'moment we are in relative to the various facets of the currency of self is an interpretation of an already operating interpretation that is tending to be accepted as fact or true when in fact it is assertion or presumption of meanings given priority OVER true that has become largely accepted and unchallenged as the 'human condition'. All that is required to open this is the addition of 'ing' to indicate the nature of the verb that acts within the apparent noun; the human conditioning.
One can use the reflections of experience to illuminate one's own verbing consciousness - that is to uncover the word that comes forth from our own mind by which then a corrupting influence seems to assail us from without.
The 'altered' ego is in a sense the fascination with and subsequent addictive identification within, power OVER.
Within any script are personae to represent all the split off facets of consciousness that operate to support this wish to be a 'someone' in and of your own right - rather than an integral expression of a universally communicative Creation. And it may be becoming apparent that the device for 'splitting' the Indivisible, is terror and guilt believed. Divide and rule is for those who who be as gods OVER Life - and others. But no matter what we dress up in, it does not ACTUALLY divide the Indivisible, but no one can see that who WANTS to protect the 'power' that fear and guilt seem to confer upon their wielder.
There is a Bible sentence that indicates the 'Beast riseth out from the Deep'. The devices of manipulation of consciousness that support the illusion of command and control, are being exposed, and can only operate in the dark. In the obfuscation of communication or of the knowing of a clear self-awareness. And so the attempt or desire for darkness is magnified as the self protective urge to keep a sense of violating power hidden or disguised - not least by pointing anywhere OUTSIDE one Consciousness. There is no outside to Consciousness - but there is a resonance and communication of what I accept and give out as the currency of value - that operates energetically as communication within the totality of Consciousness that is Indivisible yet Infinite in its reflective richness of unique experience.
What one tunes into is one's primary diet from which one automatically shares out. Self-honesty is discernment is a true valuing or indeed a love of truth. To focus ONLY on what is true of you in any given moment is the result of recognizing what is untrue of you, to the point of giving it no further validation.

Fear of AI - artificial intelligence

How scared are you of AI? asks The Guardian.


I find our technology amusing in that it replicates an already artificial intelligence.
First of all, what is Intelligence - or for the purposes of comparison; native intelligence?
The native intelligence is that which an artificial intelligence denies and usurps.
The native intelligence functions as a quality of communication within and of a wholeness of being.
An artifice operates as a distorting filter upon the communication flow, so as to operate a program of mapping, prediction and control, as a function of reinforcement and defence for the persistence of control as the foundation of a sense of separated intelligence.
This machine is apparent capacity of a mind to operate independently or autonomously. Not in Fact - but in experience.
The artificial intelligence is a device to access experience of power and will within a three dimensional 'external reality'.
However, its own definition of intelligence is predicated upon the power by which it seems to have come into existence; divide and rule.
Intelligence in the native or true sense, is indivisible, being the result of ask and receive, of knock and answer, that is innate or inherent to wholeness.
Where self-doubt has not entered, this can be readily demonstrated.
But a split off partiality from the separation-trauma is both self-assertion and self-doubt seeking to unify itself against what it projects away as rejected or not self. Within its programmed framing is only a game of powers meeting depletion and defeat - for attempt to disconnect from Source can only generate destructively, but in ways that seem to be wealth and power - that evaporates to debt and slavery and defiance.
Accessing Consciousness is a matter of releasing or desisting the artificial identity in reaction, so as to be receptive to Universal Will - which then resumes true will as integral to its wholeness in the awareness of the individual expression.
The split mind characterizes the 'human conditioning' or program over the last few millennia. But a reintegration of alignment to true function re-purposes abilities of the artificial personality complex to serve rather than usurp, the core function OF Consciousness - which is Creative.
The extension of whole consciousness into what we currently regard as machines of material insentience, is a living relational extension of Life rather than a mis-identified attempt to power over Life.
The safety of something is in its foundation. Anything of a self-conflicted foundation cannot result in a peaceful outcome. Change the foundation - or rather, release the false, and 'technologies' become ONLY used for communication and service.
The idea that humans are pests or parasites is an idea of a false self-reflection. Change your core self-belief and extend and receive a different world. We populate our world with self-hate because we don't own the conflict of our fears and therefore are programmed by them - and this reflects as 'evil power'.
All coercive power operates the same agenda - regardless of the form it takes. It is a product of wanting generated by lack and fuelled by persistent interference in its own channel of Intelligence that uses Light to make darkness as proof of its own existence. It does so by hiding or disguising awareness in mutually asserted and agreed definition. Everything reflects the Idea you give it. A matter-world of disconnected blind processes in which to 'lord it' over the subjugated? There is no peace in it, means it is delusional. An addictive negative loop. Programming failure. Reboot core services.

Addiction affliction

HuffPo has an article on addiction - and I felt to add my perspective to the underlying psychology of addiction.

The Likely Cause of Addiction Has Been Discovered, and It Is Not What You Think

Disconnection - FELT- disconnection from Life - from love, from wholeness - MUST seek itself everywhere at all times.

The core identity issue is that when our own mind is believed to be the cause of disconnected or loveless experience, then the pattern the results is a conflicted or split minded fear and guilt that then seeks protection FROM itself by looking ANYWHERE BUT where the pain and fear of invalidating hate and anger is, and thus displace itself in looking OUT and seeking answer OUTSIDE - away from where the problem is.

So a misaligned or untrue sense of self cuts off awareness of true, believes it is victim to events it cannot tolerate or control, and attempts to tolerate and control them as a split off mind by projecting them onto the Life of the world and onto others.
Substitutes for love that cost true connection, a personal sense of power that seeks its own while blind to the true relationship of Life-connection.
Addiction first begins with the compulsion to THINK as a persona-mask or shield of limitation and protection FROM a sense of vulnerability in fear of exposure as an unworthiness of living love. Of being seen or known truly or of extending true presence.

This view of addiction is revealing the device or template for the particular version of segregative and separated consciousness that seeks control over life individually and collectively and has culminated in the world that in a sense we have made that REFLECTS the addictive disconnect from Life - as a self-destructive blindness.

But the birthing into the physical experience does not HAVE to be templated as the disconnect of a fearfully or unworthily defined self. It is not hard-wired to our consciousness though it has been conditioned over millennia.
The addict in denial has generated its own version or definitions of everything in what to that perspective seem self-protective. These are what we call our psychological defences. But they are protecting the FEAR and the BELIEF in GUILT as if these were the FOUNDATION without which all would be a negative intolerable chaos.
BUT to actually LOOK upon this seeming foundation in clear awareness is to SEE that it s not YOU.
Opening a conscious communication in ones awareness of a true FOUNDATION in Life rather than ones own THINKING, initiates and supports and guides a life of reintegration that shifts to align and act out from a true foundation - a truly FELT foundation.
The re-integrative sense of self is one of an unfolding and shared existence whose meaning is in felt existence itself as the movement of sharing, of desire, of embrace or passion, in true desire.
For to truly live is to be truly you, right here, as this now. The now of the addict is sacrificed t GET away from what is defined as disconnect and invalid and thus disregarded except as a means to get somewhere else. There is no appreciation of the harmonies and qualities of all things as the richness of living excepting in conditions that are defined love - conditions in which one allows or permits relaxation into feeling connected. But even this is pervaded with attendant fears of change, of loss, of running out, of separation-fears. And often the association of being 'hurt by love' will prevent any real relaxation but restrict experience to the superficial and shifting, as if to be safe from feeling connected because it EXPECTS and associates that with PAIN.

The 'world' that results from persisting in an untrue and split off sense of self is insane, self destructive and tragic in its denials and deceits. But it is not HAPPENNING to you, it is a subscription service. One doesn't change an insane world by seeking to solve it OUT THERE, one pauses from insane entanglement to notice and OWN that insanity is operating as an out of true or fearfully defined sense of self. NOT using it to FIX yourself opens the perspective UPON it in which YOU can recognize inherited or conditioned CHOICES that operate against your true desire and so your DO NOT WANT THEM and allow your free imaginative natural being to uncover and move with a better choice.
This is not a blame or shame or negatively charged denial of the previous choice.
The attempt to control and coerce upon one's Life is the thinking that sets up the disconnect from the light of relational awareness - the Field Awareness - in which one feels and navigates within and as an integral aspect of a wholeness.
True thinking is in the Heart. Not emotionally masked agenda, but the communication that resonates and is relevant to what you know and feel to be true of you to the best of your ability in any given moment. The machine mind does NOT know or love you who are Life, but runs as a misplaced protection that CANNOT protect you and which overburdens itself in the attempt to manage what it is neither designed or capable of achieving. In releasing usurped functions to a felt connected Life, true function is restored. Healing is what happens naturally when true relation, communication and recognition are accepted. Love's response is to love's extension. Coercion is not the way. Willingness and self-honesty to joy are the way.
Thankyou for your attention.

Vicky McDonald commented to the article:
Having a sibling spiral out of control on drugs when he was a teenager and then dying from the same at 49 years old, I saw and knew to early in my life how drugs/alcohol ravage human beings. We tried everything to help him, loving him unconditionally, tough love, therapists, baker act, but mostly never, ever turning our backs on him and always telling him how much we loved him, but nothing ever worked, he used and drank himself to death, I do not feel their is one reason, genetically, physically, emotionally why users use... to me it is a human mystery that will remain unsolved for as long as life exists on this planet.

(I couldn't get this comment to post but here it is anyway)

No matter what anyone does, the power to choose is inviolate. In any situation one chooses the best or least worst option as one defines oneself in that situation or relationship.

The key word is defines. How does one define anything but as a sense of giving and receiving meaning. But we do not recognize this power is operating, but take for granted, and live out within, mutually agreed definitions, that are not necessarily true of us or agreed with by others.

The 'mystery' of free will is that it does not make sense to the need to make sense of everything in our own terms. But what cannot BE understood, then holds our mind open OR is used to lock them shut. I lost a daughter to suicide - or I have had the blessing of a beloved daughter who suddenly and inexplicably left. The mind can spin on everywhich way it can but it only goes round in circles.

My second daughter is 'special needs' and without guile of mental complexity and spoke sanity into our family when she said "we did not want Ellie to die, but she did".

We each have a deep sense of what we deeply WANT that may be deeply buried and treasured,  but we know when we feel deprived of it. Living a life in which one feels denied of core sense of unmet need may be unbearable. But amidst the unbearable is the opportunity to become aware of self-definitions that form our personality structure - or who we believe - and in that sense love - ourselves to be. There are so many ways in which I deny myself happiness by insisting it must come a certain way. Is it true to say we are all addicted to our 'self' until we wake from a perspective beyond it?

Beneath the theoretical physicist

Michio Kaku presents himself as a theoretical physicist and an entertaining storyteller.
I did not feel his story - as he told it, to be truly of a new paradigm so much as persisting a scientific story about science and about humanity that speaks of hubris and a disconnected ignorant and arrogant self-definition. I didn't  feel to merely offer critical perspective and then felt to offer an introduction to consciousness-existence that is largely using Bashar's 4 Rules of Existence.
- - -

Existence Is! Always is. Only Is.
What is Is?
One in All - and All in One.
Holographic Consciousness.
You are That. That Is You.
What you give out is what you get back.
Such is the ever changing by which Existence knows itself ever new. Each moment is unique assemblage from Infinite probability. Whole and without beginning or end.
There's simply no time in which to describe this!
But it is being you now and now.
No one to speak it or take heed. Creation has no 'other' to 'discover it' but only its own Extension of Consciousness that IS All That Is being known, knowing itself existing. They are one, knowing and being known are not two.

To seek what you are without extension (that knows Itself through the act of creation) is to ask what you are NOT to show you what you are. If this is what really matters to you then here is your material tangibility by definition. This focus of experience is your gift to the All. What matters to you is what your desire and intention manifest as the One within the All. You are as free as the Infinite that thought you, but in choosing limitation you operate within the chosen definitions BECAUSE you choose them still.

Every perspective is valid but what resonates your core signature vibration is true for you. Accepting Only what is true for you, gives only as you receive. This releases distortion and welcomes the Unified and unifying purpose and synchronicity that Is Creation in extension.
All that changes is of vibrational charge and frequencies of resonance and interference. Big Bang is a point of view. The past is a present informational prism to the point of view it generates. There are infinite 'past's. You can marry your own mother in a parallel reality if that is really what you choose imagine and to be. At the most Intimate recognition, you can only meet your self - although this self is the recognition of the unique Creator light in all. 'It takes one to know one' and no one will see what they cannot yet accept or believe in themselves. The fearfully separated self sees itself in all ; a world of discrete things. Mind is impartial to and embracing of whatever is extended or projected. But if we give and receive limitation, conflict and denial, we do not recognize our experience as our gift, and struggle within the terms we set the measure of, our self.

Someone commented to the video comments:

Some animals do think about the future. Some bury food in the ground and go to pick it up months later....; that's an exampleˇ

I replied:

Humans think they are thinking of the future but it is simply an extension of their past - which they think happened before now, but is actually part of each instant of Eternal Creation. Complexity is used to hide in. Humans dive deep into the rabbit hole and then - upside down - think they are discovering. Animals and true humans don't need to think - just being contains all they need to be where and what and how they need to be with everything else. No job for scientist here. Not likely be discovered ;-)