BECAUSE Climate is so complex

Climate: Is The Debate Over?

BECAUSE Climate is so complex - it should be protected from (power political not party political), narrative manipulation.

Because SCIENCE is always more complex than media spin or corporate utility - it should be protected from political narrative manipulation.

Manipulative from the point of view of fears, environmental guilt, and the targeting and leveraging of these to further private agenda under the mask of protection from disaster.

Private agenda - backed by huge (global) investments are locked into models just as individuals are locked into polarised identities. When it comes down to it - people act from their convictions and beliefs - and find the science or whatever other justifications support them.

Quite apart from the manipulative framework that pushes this agenda as a global leverage to an energy (guilted) Economy under the Internet of Things. (Internment of Things?), the input from our Sun is considered only in terms of radiative force. The standard model does not allow or acknowledge the electrical force as the embracing cosmological  factor at all scales. The Solar capacitance to Earth is itself the driver of earth's so called magnetosphere, and the electrical nature of 'weather' within and above the Earth is within and beneath the forces that are generally supposed to be at work.

The closed mind - or in 'spiritual terms' the closed off sense of a separate mind - posits closed systems as a result of its assertion of self-autonomy.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The attempt to 'close the mind' is in such terms as 'settled science' or 'scientific consensus'.

Light on Regeneration

The Natural Way to Regenerate
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)

Stephanie Seneff's studies also have some bearing on sunlight as health-giving. Subject to cholesterol sulphate being abundant. Cholesterol deficiency and lack of sulphur in diet (along with other toxicities and deficiencies) operate a negative synergy instead of the positive synergy of such energetic communications as this video indicate.
Breaking Life down into parts so as to manually 'improve, control or replace' it, always persists the original split-mind that expresses and embodies a sense of war with our nature, rather than a balancing within our nature.

As long as the god/evil polarity operates coercively in place of a felt relation within the whole, will a reversal or anti-bio force fuel its negative reflection.

The self-righteous mask over un-owned 'evil' or dissonance of conflicted identity - blindly persists a hate agenda. Letting light in is not a loveless analytical exposure to cold mechanism - but is a receptive willingness of desire or attraction to a fulfilment in like kind.

Therefore I do not see any outer intervention as in itself being able to substitute for or replace the willing desire for health - though it may operate as a permission slip for such desire to find conscious acceptance. And then how truly is our desire for health a movement of love for unconflicted  wholeness of being - and how much are we deceived by the attempt to evade, hide or deny and eradicate the sickness of a feared outcome? There is a difference in going wholly for what you want and defining yourself in terms of what you don't want. The latter drags its baggage wherever it goes.

The energetic communication of Life at all 'levels' of our existence - including our body - is mind-blowing - or infinitely beyond the scope or capacity of a mind-mapping attempt to command and control. But our maps and models can replace a true foundation so as to meet an entirely different reflection that of course reinforces where we are coming from - for that is the way the 'experience' is designed to be. To play out. To work as feedback to our balancing within.

Coming back to Stephanie Seneff - I like her willingness to consider that if the body does it - it embodies a positive reason within stress or deficiency and not a rogue oppositional evil to (therefore) block or eradicate. I see that science inherited a lot from the old religion it thought to have invalidated - and embodies the same hatreds operating in the 'name' of reason - or any other of its trojan horses.

The Big Science Con

Individuals, Not Governments, Drive Scientific Progress
By Daily Bell Staff

My comment into this theme:

As framed in human experience, we seem to be explorers and discoverers - struggling against not only adversities of the 'human condition' but the ignorances and arrogances of human conditioning.

 The covering over or 'forgetting' of Knowing - operates another 'identity' than that which is innate to our Individuality of Life Expression - and undercurrent to its masked persona or role in presentation is a running away or avoidance of the core separation trauma or conditioning that has imprinted and set up the patterns of relationship that are all forms of power struggle within a pervasive threat that allure as the desire to take the power position that is absented by the loss of Knowing - which is full feeling presence and not a 'divide and rule' fragmented assertion or imposition against free-willing.

 Individual free willing has been subverted by the redefining of will as power -over rather than as alignment-within the power of love - recognized and recognisable as a wholeness and balanced quality of spirit, feeling, mind and body.

 Everything has thus been subverted and redefined from its original native language of recognition to 'currencies' of dissociation that operate a primary role in maintaining the block on such true communication so that power-struggle can persist as the only 'power on Earth' and the determining guide and protector to our life on Earth.

 The process of Re-wakening or Re-membering from and as a deeper recognition of Felt Being rather than 'assertion of an emotion-backed thinking' and struggling among its reflections, is of releasing a particular form of fear-based control that blinds - or operates as the darkness or lack of Knowing - as attempt to fill a LACK of presence with an imposed narrative identity.

 Conflict that feeds upon itself becomes paralysis - masking as 'order' of limitation in which 'control' seems to hold perceived or believed 'chaos' at bay. Balance of inner communication is a required foundation for re-opening an expanded participation of energetic relationship beyond the 'gravitic' model that 'separates' the 'Living Universe' by reducing a communication of Totality to a teeny force acting at a distance between remote bodies.

 Yet no instant or experience of anything or anyone but is of the Whole - regardless the frameworks of meaning that can be applied as filters and distortions to meet the demand of the 'mind' currently accepted and projected as your own.

 Living Communication is of an energetic nature that will never altogether fit or conform to any model or definition - BUT our models and definitions can be aligned with our true willing so as to be guided and supported in that energetic - and embody it.

 Without more alignment - opening the 'Doors of Perception' is opening a destructive reversal to the possibility of a truly embodied Humanity - of which only tiny glimpses have thus far leaked into 'Plato's Cave'. For no 'man-minded substitute for Knowing can abide in the presence of the Source of all Thought, Feeling and Form. False currency is revealed.

 Yet the veils ARE lifting or disintegrating - regardless the concerted focussing in collective 'identity' and so as see it, we are obliged - as in a crash-course of necessity - to find and live such alignment. Not because an unloving edict demands it - but because the persistence of an unloving edit costs so much in terms of the pain of life denied. And the true desire uncovered is for life in Life's terms and not on what I previously identified and defended as 'me'.

 The underlying pattern of consciousness is itself the censoring, limiting and controlling power - that has all the power we give it by operating blindly as its embodiment - in all its various roles. One key role of which is of hatred and opposition - for this is where we get a sense of 'power' from in place of being perfectly identified in a true relational willingness - which is not given or accepted by rote or as programmed - but is a truly felt and acted event. It is reclaiming your life back from alignment with a false sense of power.

 Growing the communications of a true resonance in Life is different than feeding off the seemingly self-righteous forms of power that persist in ancient patterns of role-play. It is not waiting for Life to come and validate its new world order - in fact it is not identifying primarily in the forms of its expression at all - but as the underlying communication of Idea that is Alive - and re-Minding us by operating through us and reflecting to us - each within the Whole and therefore within each other.

 The scientific expansion of perspective that HAS been revealed has not yet been accepted in its Consciousness implications and obligations - because the core imprinting of limitation via division and control is not itself recognized - in act. This is an individual responsibility that no amount of 'teaching theory' or associating in 'identity' woven of such theory can substitute for. Yet the mind in 'rehearsal' does substitute for Life - as if to bring safety while seeming to work towards resolving or regaining lost power.

 False currency is a key phrase I use here on Daily Bell - for in an extroverted form - you are aware of the device by which to own the system by which all else has been brought to depend on. Expansion of Consciousness is the recognition within Mind of perspectives that were already present but effectively hidden or denied by one's current sense of self-definition.

 All definitions bring consequences or fruits of identity-experience. But only those that align with who you truly know and feel yourself to be - are belonging in you. If you persist in attempting to become who you are not - you will succeed in forgetting who you are. This is a moment by moment responsibility. You cannot 'go to mind' and get a formula for how to live your life. You are an individual at root regardless the fragmentations that are reflecting as experience - but this is a fruit to be savoured and appropriately shared, not a mind-identity to sacrifice true presence of Life to - so as to 'replace it'.

 My comment here responds to the energetic that the article communicates within me - not merely the forms. In an 'Electric Universe', Everything is Communication - bar none. But the act of definition operates some quality of differentiation and limitation within the Idea of focusing in true desire.

 To be the 'puzzle piece' that I truly am is to meet the alignments of Life regardless that others have their own freely unfolding experience. This is my individuality - for no role is invalidated - just because it is not my current choice. We do not gain power by invalidating the power of others - we lose it. But power here means something different to what it is currently colluded in meaning.

 Redeeming meaning from false or falsely framed meanings is a true accounting. It is only by a false accounting that pain and destruction can be outsourced to 'others' while playing out an elitist or exclusive and Life-rejecting 'individualism'.

 The idea of a 'need to know' uncovering its desire fulfilled is also the need or desire to be who you are - regardless of any obstructions, persecutions or limitations encountered. Indeed these are part of the unfolding and not really as the sense of lack defines them, but this has to be realised to be true. It cant just be asserted true as if to gain a superior commentary position within the identity in lack.

 We (each) - and on that basis - together have to find ways to use apparent obstruction or adversity so as to restore and reintegrate to living purpose rather than fragment into polarized reactivity. Unless that is in fact the purpose that is accepted as your living will.

 We are conditioned to seek greater force of leverage - but I invite a greater perspective upon our active definitions. Imagination is freedom - and in freedom to imagine other perspectives is an arbitrary set of mind replaced without war - although the symptoms of an old pattern may persist while the core of new insight grows within.

 Emotionality is not free feeling - and in a sense is the fear of intimacy or full feeling. The 'resistance' to looking within is generally held in place by emotionally backed conditioning. But to exclusively 'look out' - without true insight is a state of dissociation and denial - regardless how 'normal' its consensual camouflage.




     dsaulw made this comment to the main article:

     Not only will government-sponsored science not produce anything innovative to speak of, it will do its best to destroy anyone who is trying to advance science that runs counter to the party line. Just think about what it has done to global warming dissidents, and to those who have come up with treatments for cancer outside of the sanctioned box.

  

 My response to dsaulw:


     I feel you would be better saying 'corporate-governance'. The corporate sector long ago 'captured' and subverted most of any power in government from behind the scenes. So called 'trade deals' like TPIP are only seeking to 'legalize' this openly.

     If there were somehow 'free trade' restored to idea exploration and development then would we all not simply recreate the same hierarchical power struggle because our relation to idea is exploitative rather than truly creative?

     As for science - its foundations define its limits and although the model can be tweaked around the edges and minutiae of details filled in - they will all be conformed and interpreted through the core foundational intent - and so the dots are joined up to 'validate' what the core intention is set to - regardless the forms it takes.

     'Trojan horse' is an idea of hiding agenda in a seemingly sacred or benign and auspicious or acceptable and respectable form. Once you have 'swallowed the bait' your identity is compromised - or replaced - with something not unlike a cuckoo's egg, where the emergent chick sucks your resources and protections while destroying your true offspring. Not unlike the forms of many cancers

     The reversal or undoing of deceit operates from a true foundation rather than becoming baited into conflict. The growing or rising of wholeness and health within the body politic is through the witnessing of its living qualities regardless appearances and assertions to the contrary.

     You (anyone) may observe the patterns you ascribe to 'government' in your own mind so readily as to be almost stating the self-evident - that has somehow been rendered invisible by a 'collectivist' hatred of oppositional or rival power that is demonized when inconvenient to the furthering or masking of one's own.

     Innovations as such, may have far reaching consequences that may be much harder (or impossible) to put back in their box than release - such as genetic engineering or AI in their ability to replace humanity and the environment with hacked versions carrying agenda that even their proponents may be ignorant of.

     The idea of progress is according to What and Who and Why. A lust for power over Life that does not know the root of its own drive to possess it - has a different notion of progress than the desire to embracing Life.

     "Ironically, ever since we “scientized” nutrition, the state of our health has declined. Decisions about what to eat and drink have gone from habits of culture and heritage to calculated choices based on shortsighted nutritional theories, with little consideration of how human beings reached modernity in the first place." (~ Pearlmutter: Grain Brain)

     'Scientizing' is weaponizing or marketising - in short it is operating a command and control power agenda under the guise of 'serving humanity', 'progress', evolution and of course to make a 'better world' or even a new world order - but for who exactly? The anti-Nature element in science has an arrogant undertone of deep seated rage and distrust - as if "Never Again!" to suffer such hurt or loss as has become collectively associated with what such distrust frames as our 'original' or given nature.

     Seeking to make 'sense' of experience arises when we know not what we do - and don't recognize ourselves in Creation - and so mind that operated as if disconnected calls upon itself to justify itself in denial of its own reflection.

     The 'meanings' given cancer and used as currency by society are almost all those of the rogue cell or the symptom as the disease to be warred upon, eradicated or managed because it cant be trusted not to flare up and kill you. This is not a biological practicality so much as the original imprinting from which we have not evolved regardless clothing it in technological sophistry. However - on a biological level:

     http://www.westonaprice.org/modern-diseases/cancer-to-the-rescue/

     Seneff offers a welcome shift of perspective that does not automatically assign or dump guilt and causality on the body as a 'rogue agent' but recognizes relationship with environmental nutrients and toxicities as the point at which accepted but false 'truths' have undermined a natural discerning OF mind by the confusion of identifying within such thinking.

     This thinking is so deeply embedded and emotionally charged so as to make a cancer diagnosis a 'voodoo' that can trigger a deeper guilt and powerlessness of Life that often collapses to accept any directions of 'help' that are generally emphatically asserted as an immediate step without pause to question or challenge any of the information and what it actually means.

     The 'sin' - and punishment - is then projected to anyone who 'deprives' or misleads with 'false' hope in place of 'official treatment' that is more often than not more destructive than the disease.

False Impressions

Maple Syrup Cures Alzheimer’s?

This week, Fox News published a startling report titled, “Maple syrup isn’t just delicious, it could also cure Alzheimer’s disease.”...

Further down the page the flippant comment:

Hi David Perlmutter.
Now see what you started.
Some delighted readers will read the first paragraph here and quickly rush off the the super market for a large helping of mayple syrup, and now also probably a box of mars bars.
It's only a week ago I was told of an elderly diabetic who was heard to say "A mars bar a day keeps the doctor away."

Whilst spoken in jest - there is a serious point here - in that a lazy avoidance of personal responsibility seeks 'magic' or shortcut answers so as to NOT be interrupted in their particular style of sleepwalking.
Initially this can work for a while - if you follow information from trusted sources or conditionings gained by previous experience. But life is uniquely expressing itself as You - along with all that you are in relation with - and part of that expression is a quality of discernment - unless that is so denied as to leave a conditioned robot in place of a living relational dance.

However, I come back to state that our conscious use of language is one of the most powerful tools for transformation - for it is not just the form of what is said - but it true relational context from which it arises.

There is nothing one can do to be received by anyone who is not only not listening - but determined to hear only what they already decided you said.

I hold that health is inner wholeness - and that this extends and reflects in our relationships - on all levels. Dis-ease is also fragmentation and conflict, in which UN-recognized mis-alignments and imbalances become focal points of mis-identification. From a false basis - everything else will seem lopsided and chaotic.

There are occasions where inner realisations have suddenly shifted - healed - chronic dis-ease - but that does not invalidate every other way in which such a restored presence of living displaces a conflicted sense of 'problem'.

On one level the form is the carrier of the wave or 'non-local' vibrational field.  But a filtering distortion of conflicting self-definition experiences the world as if it had built in meanings - and suffers them as if discrete facts.

Healthy mind and body can facilitate free awareness in which to notice and be curious. Thus a device for self-limiting or indeed humanly limiting others is that of distractive addictions, inflammation, diversion in division within a drama of self that implicitly demands resolving - though set in terms that cannot be resolved.

Down the Rabbit Hole

Professor Stephen Hawking claims black holes are gateways to mysterious alternative dimensions 

Clearly we have been and are already powering our 'consciousness' and society from such a power source and the vanity and arrogance that thought it could contain and control it is operating as a denial overlay of controlled masking narrative. It has feasting on human beings, and our home planet -which had been quarantined as a result as both a strait jacket and in a 'prime directive' to see if we would be able to awaken out of such a 'back door' hack, or 'take ourself down' - but not in a way that would be allowed to operate a contagion of informational energetic to the larger community.

So by this black-hole power we generate the conviction and its reflected experience that we are alone - and of course secretly enamoured of the 'power' to lord it over Life - redefining everything in terms of our 'alone-ness' as a world of 'object' rather than as an appreciation of relational wholeness communicating in all its parts.

An inner shift in Humanity is synchronous with the re-opening of communion - for higher level communication communicates as Feeling and Imagination - for the communication vortices are no longer blocked from consciousness. Hence unfolding 'discovery'.

Adam: (to the main article)All this proves is that even so-called scientists indulge in fairy story fantasies. If Hawking believes that it is possible to "travel through a black hole" then I dare him and other "scientists" with such similar views to climb inside a washing machine and put it on full spin cycle and then state whether it is possible to go through black holes (assuming they survive the spin cycle). A black hole would be a billion times worse than the spin cycle and you would be ripped apart molecule by molecule, atom by atom and subatomic particle by subatomic particle.   Data may survive but humans won't. Hawking should know that, instead of pandering to this mythological nonsense. 

  

Me:

If scientists didn't access imagination, you would have NO science. You're obvious and visceral hatred of myth no doubt has mythic roots in you. Humans can determine - in the main - when things are to be taken literally - until of course they lock on to a literal belief in a model and worship and conform all things to their one true model - regardless what form it takes.

You believe that you know you are a body and that is your notion of 'humanity'. well and good if it serves you.

I have a perspective of 'through a body, rather than in it or AS it - though without a 'spacesuit' of body and personality construct, one cannot participate in the focus of an individual human experience. The quality of being - by whatever name - that moves beneath the structure of meanings experienced is non-local. We have trained a 'mind' not to look there - not least with separation trauma which was not so dissimilar to your washing machine metaphor. Nothing survives its moment.

Masking within 'scientific' consensus

I noticed this phrase in this article wherein assertions of scientific veracity refuse and deny any scientific challenge or debate:

"The vast majority of scientific opinion"

I couldn't make this up!
Politics seeks consensus.
Science challenges it.
If 99.9% of scientists - or anyone else - base their logic on a false presumption - the fact doesn't change because of a 'consensus' - but there is now an investment of reputation, status, privilege and power on the false model being maintained regardless of 'facts'. And so a true humanity is sacrificed to support a world-view felt 'too big to fail' - by those who are the 'Establishment' of power that has grown upon and around the error.

The iron fist shows through as the velvet glove disintegrates - and a 'truth' that is imposed upon us, associated with rage over terror or pain of loss, and is raised up like a god who cannot be named - because its 'power' is fearful and it 'protection' is a racket.

Yet it is a survival urge that cannot allow a breach in its foundation. But what 'survives' is the error - and the tragic consequences of the error persist. A god of fear is a false foundation - but the fear of fear - and the beliefs arising that seek a source of power over a feared nature - are deeply imprinted in and formative of human consciousness. It doesn't matter if it's true or not - they need to believe in it - so it works because they need to maintain the belief - or the St George of Science finds its dragon not only unvanquished but encircling an increasing fear of powerless-ness; the rise of 'irrationality, emotionality and loss of control'. But science is not threatened in any way excepting one neglects to enquire and open to the discovery of truth. Truth is never threatened - but our model of it can seem to be - when we forget it is a model - and take it as true - and live from a false image and suffer it real because in pride we inflated a sense of power that we now cant - or wont - release to what is truly moving here.

It is never the mistake that causes the bigger problem - but the attempt to cover it up. Errors are mistakes from which we can learn. Lies are hatreds we find hard to forgive - and fear of exposure covers lie with more lies. The spell is cast. Who can wake from it?





Down in the comments I saw this:

survivor3305 says:   

It is possible that both sides are correct. Pro vaccine people are right because in its pure form, vaccines do protect and cause no harm like autism. But the anti vaccine people could be right too. It is possible that substances have been added or subtracted from pure vaccines for who knows what reason, causing side effects like autism. One aspect of this controversy is telling. Censorship is so strong and pervasive indicates that a cover-up by some powerful people, which sure makes the anti-vaccine people’s case that vaccines are dangerous in their current form and that a cover-up is in full swing.

To which I responded:

Have a look at the ingredients. I don’t feel ‘pure vaccine’ is linguistically meaningful here. The canary in the mine warned of gas – but the coal dust was killing them slowly.
If anyone crosses that line to research the documentation of a critical perspective on vaccination history, then they walk out of an invisible self censorship that becomes felt IF you give permission to open your mind to listen and learn.
There are many such hidden in broad daylight.

There is an ancient pattern of self-harming or self-limiting as a way to pre-empt expected punishment. This is so pervasive as to be invisibly normal. Or greying down from a spectrum of living contrast to homogeneous lack of vitality and imagination.

There are very many very serious issues with vaccinations that are not addressable because it is enforcing state power, brooking no discussion. Full and true information is necessary for choice to be meaningful. Anti-coercion is an understandable reaction – but a misnomer. Communicate without coercion and deceit. That is not anti anything.

A Tale of Two Placebos

A Tale of Two Placebos
This Ars article offers a self-righteous anti homoeopathy agenda - perhaps in it presumption of victory over magic and enlightened alignment with T Truth.
I believe this anti homeopathy movement has been set off and encouraged by design - as the movement away from the allopathic pharmaceutical interventions and management of sickness makes drug-whores out of doctors - because such is their essential training  and function in a technocratically engineered society.
Anyway - here is my response...



Definitions frame and filter perception of whatever actually is moving or communicating itself within awareness.
The rigidly set, 'subject-denying' imposition of conceptual framing is a kind of 'anti-magic' that asserts itself in righteousness by every means to subvert and undermine and invalidate the Movement of Being that is tangibly felt Life. It does so by attempting to solve its conflicted sense of self in external terms.

This dissociation or splitting of consciousness has counterparts in reflection and reaction that indeed are also magical attempts to resolve a conflict by internal or subjective assignments of power and blame and protection.

The core emotional state of split consciousness is one that ranges between terror and rage, and compounded with guilt, blame and shame.

The surface personality structure is a masking of such raw imprinting in which the conflicted issues surface as dissonance of impotence and frustration in which the 'reality' of the perceptions are adapted to in order to survive or indeed prevail over.

The missing or denied quality in the conflicted sense of self is relationship and communication, and these are substituted for by a hierarchy of roles in which status and identity is derived externally - as a result of conditioned experience - asserted to be one's independent 'self'.

To be truly listened to, cared for, extended worthiness, recognized by another living being, is a key transformative context in which what has not found communication in expression can rise and become the shift in which a re-integrative movement of consciousness or 'healing', undoes the segregative dissociation and is experienced as a more aligned and less conflicted sense of self and relational experience or world.

Ultimately the world is props that serve the narrative or core definitions of the focusing consciousness. Different personality make-up attracts different kinds of 'permission slips' through which to allow the release of limiting and invalidating baggage.

One of the most destructive of which is the idea that there is but one true FORM (or definition) of Truth. This is inherently rejecting and denying or invalidating of all else. While this idea operates 'self-concept' there is no relationship, communication or free will - only a compulsive dictate issuing from the distortion-filter of the idol taken as self.

The most subtle perceptions and conceptions of existence are of vibrational correspondences. To put it in simple metaphor, you ONLY receive the channel you are programmed into receiving and if you take that as The Truth, you are necessarily unaware of the full range of frequency of experience AND  the tuning dial of free willing receptivity.

The ongoing abuse and denial of the free will by an enslaving elite 'consciousness' is entirely dependent upon the supporting role of the denied in maintaining such a power relationship of juxtaposing hidden denials. Guilt and fear led beliefs are not free willing and in this sense are not true of you as one worthy of being recognized and received. If such reception is anathema to who you feel and assert yourself to be, then you have no desire to embrace Life but only to deny it - and so you choose to meet your reflection as being unable to feel and know and share the relational Movement of Being Itself.

Don't be blinded by science. It is not more or less that a tool to serve the purpose given it. The purpose you give it or accept and share in by your own participance.

Science and Experiential Consciousness

A Brain On LSD Looks Like A Psychotic Brain, Says New Study

A brain on LSD looks a lot like a psychotic brain. Earhart-Harris says that these images of a brain on LSD look a lot like a brain right before a psychotic episode. In both cases, neurons that used to work together start firing out of sync, and neurons that normally wouldn't work together suddenly do.

A brain on LSD is self-absorbed. The scans showed that the electrical activity of the brain slowed down substantially, mimicking the sorts of wave patterns doctors see during visual hallucinations. This led the team to believe that a brain on LSD is "tethered more to the internal than to the external world."

I love that phrase 'internal world'. Whatever the 'external world' is, any capacity to participate 'IN' it - in character, as it were - is dependent on a range of events of aligned purpose.
Is 'inner world' a direct experiential communication of such purpose? - but mis-perceived when experienced and conformed to the framework of artificial outer-world 'unity'.
LSD can open experiential perspectives preverbally of many aspects of multidemensional Cosmology - which is why the stories of tech innovators using it (including micro dosing) to open insight that can contribute to the frontier of rapidly innovating evolution of tech.
However, there are other similar and more natural substances including DMT which is secreted in the pineal gland - is it not - as a matter of course?
The realm of Consciousness is of course the realm of inherited psychic and emotional CHAOS - that a large part of the surface mind (external reality) seeks to LIMIT and CONTROL. Indeed there are suggestions that the brain is a Limitation device - although that also allows a very particular focus within Everything At ONCE!
But accountable controllable reproducible conceptual theory maps and models are already setting a range of parameters that filter and distort what can be 'found'.
Coming back to the idea of purpose, the 'what for' - as far as science is concerned is simply persistence (survive and procreate). Coupled with the sanctioned purpose of prevailing to procreate and persist - we have the exact basis for the psychopathic financial and corporate globalism that scientists probably are not perhaps aware of - being somewhat focussed in their (scientific) tools or specialities.

I'm not averse to ANY discipline serving a true Humanity - (which I regard as inherently purposeful) but the accretions of scientism around true scientific curiosity and endeavour has accumulated a particular ignorance and arrogance. Perhaps some exposure to experiential and somewhat chaotic 'reality' is missing in modern scientific careers?

PS - because of the imprint of terror, guilt, fear and shame that is pre-loaded as part of the human template - in various ways and degrees in various individuals. The 'regression' or exposure to the primitive or infancy states of consciousness is EXACTLY where the trigger for psychosis activates, and psychosis is one of many strategic reactions to the trigger state. A key insight being that the attempt to CONTROL reflects immediately as a CHAOS that then escalates and reinforces the need and justification FOR control. This 'control mentality' then becomes the protector of the 'war against terror'. If perspective is not regained the mind splits or fragments - and attempts to unify the sense of personal control grows the capacity to operate as 'a cohesive unit' out of many conflicting purposes or 'realities'. All of this is already reflected and study able as our world - but is not connected with inner 'reality' - while the non-physical or non local is discarded, rejected and filtered out - because its acknowledgement implicitly illuminates arenas of dependence that the control mentality finds insulting or a trigger to rage and a desire to manually replace it with its OWN systems.

Signal and noise - and a strange gait

Report of discovery of large object in far outer edges of solar system incites skeptical reactions

I read quite a few comments (to this article) and offer another criteria for discerning signal from noise. Whenever a poster resorts to attempts to invalidate or attack or denigrate others - there is an unwillingness or incapacity to actually communicate.

There is (always) more than 'factual data', there is the interpretation of that data - which is never without agenda. Self-honesty seeks to an openness without merely conforming to pre-existing known or hidden bias. But human beings are not given to self-honesty when they have investment of identity, status, and security at stake. And so the competing of asserted 'realities, models or paradigms' operates like any war, in a world predicated on war - because self-honesty is met with ridicule, demonisation and denial.

The undercurrent emotional conditionings that rule the mind of those who must be perceived to be in conformance to be credible, respectable or acceptable operates a kind of scientism that is presenting itself as a form of coercive agenda



Experts discover new gait pattern among top Russian officials
(researchers study video of top Russians and find 'gunslinger gait').

A kind of cloning is readily observable in terms of acquired traits, for the forms or behaviours of influence propagate by induction.
If there is felt to be an advantage - then certain forms are adopted as part of one's persona - which is a kind of meta-communication - through which identity can be masked and allegiances can be indicated.
If there are enough videos going back, the researcher might discover if Putin is a primary seeder as one might expect. When Hilary re-emerged after losing to Obama as part of his team - her diction had become a clone of his.
In fact once you tune in to this - it all shifts to reveal a masquerade

Facts to meaning - or Meaning to facts?

Comment arising from:
From facts to meaning, through beauty
by Deepak Chopra

- - -

The Idea of Science operates a mind that gathers data to construct a model of reality that holds and reinforces the same inherent 'meaning' as the mind that thus seeks.
For such a 'mind' is inherently regarded as separated from its experienced 'world' of objects and thus free to act upon it, manipulate and exploit, map and define and control it.
Originally this arose from confusing a sense of dominion over nature that is inherent to the Creator level of Consciousness, with the 'mind' or personality construct of the central character in its script of unfolding experience.
While the Creator-Spirit identifies in character, that one is as one asleep - who knows not what he does.
Yet the Fact of Awareness of Existence is immutable - regardless the unfolding or expansion of idea as experience.
The illusion of power always costs the awareness of the power of illusion - that is the power of Idea accepted, believed, experienced and identified as reality by the mind that thus thinks.
Awareness of Existence operates through differentiation and desire to create unique and infinite reflections of Meaning. The core qualities of such Meaning include Beauty, Truth, Love, Joy, Peace, Reason, Justice. Such are the fruits of the Spirit of Wholeness.
A divisive, possessive, and coercive identifiction with the image, symbol or form of any of the Qualities of Existence redefines such qualities in its own image - as through a falsely limiting framing by which things seem to be self-existing entities.
Such modification of a symbolic representation of Awareness of Existence Itself, is an overlay by which Original knowing is filtered out, obscured and distorted.
When an moment of Transcendence of such identifiction is shared or gifted, there is a shift from the limited and limiting 'mind' to a direct experience.
Awareness is exactly coincident with its experience. There is no separation. This may seem the loss of one's power to 'become' a someone in one's own right - and all the hopes and desires that go with it, but is the restoration of an Embracing Perspective to that which struggled in idea of the imposture of rejection and exclusion.
Science operates on a material or external world that inherently rises from the rejection of the Spirit or Wholeness of an undefended Open Consciousness.
The nature of such rejection is a deceit by which to seem to be defending against un-chosen and unwarranted threat. Thus the split into conscious and un-conscious compartments - not in matter - but in meanings accepted, believed and asserted in reaction.
Science can serve as a technologism of weapon, shield and strategem for the segregating sense of self, or it can serve a love of truth in honest and undefended opening to the ALREADY true.
In war truth is whatever one can assert and pass off in order to support a private agenda.
In truth there is no war.
How can there be no war in the face of such experience as we take for the human condition?
By recognizing the deceit of self-attack, upon which is raised the seeming self of a split-minded struggle.
Within the perspective of struggle - all is war, but of seemingly varying degree. To the perspective of Wholeness or Peace - we but do this unto our selves.
The reality of the 'other' cannot be discovered but through your own. In another you meet your split-minded reflection in an alloy of alliance and rejection OR you meet the freedom to be That which you are - without first defining what you are in terms OF exclusivity and rejection.
Science, re-aligned to serve an integrating wholeness, supports and reflects the Qualities of Awareness of Existence. We are not personae in fragmentation, but channels of Creative Expression. There is no way to communicate the latter to the former what so ever. Let beauty and joy restore a unified Experience - and use that perspective to act from - instead of attempting to stuff the New Wine into old paradigms.

Global Warring ; Primate Change?

'Global warming not progressing as fast as depicted in worst-case models'

A new study shows natural variability in surface temperatures can account for observed changes in the recent rates of warming from decade to decade.

- - -


The idea of Science is a freedom from distortions of coercive agenda in uncovering an ever clearer current account of what is, relative to where we believe and experience ourself to be.

The idea of a coercive agenda is to want what is to be different than it is, to such degree that the model is used as a lens or filtering framework of misinterpretation.

The ego or sense of self of such a model thus reinforces or defends itself against any fundamental change as the basic psychology of defence against threat.

This allies itself with anything that funds or supports its premise, and forgets or neglects the original scientific enquiry.

A limited and blinkered self-righteousness is thus manipulated as technologism and scientism propaganda for agendas of which few are aware because it is hidden in a blindspot of presumed, believed and WANTED true.

The underlying racket cultivates human self-specialness in order to capture and then induces scarcity in which guilt and fear allow the blatant manipulation of populations. Truly, we do this collectively unto ourselves, wherever we may seem to be on the 'pyramid of power'.

Testing the 'spirits' is discerning the psychology at work. That climate is changing is not in question. The immediate reaction of guilt - as a result of knowingly being out of accord with our nature and our environment - generates a fear driven agenda, and where Chicken Licken screams, Foxy Loxy is sure to turn up.

Re-aligning with our true nature is the restoration of an unconflicted capacity to relate to ourself and others; absent coercion.
Re-aligning science to its true function can raise the dissected corpse of an ignorant and arrogant materialism from the dead.

Planetary climate change is here - with and without what we are doing knowingly and somewhat under guise of obfuscation or 'clever' accounting - and black ops or rogue agenda that include any kind of weather manipulating technology as well as psyops of deceit, disinformation and staged events.

If one believes truth = dominance at all costs, then everything else is subsumed to that belief, for whom the only sin or crime is losing. Once the other is redefined as collateral damage or worthless - there is no relationship; only coercive manipulation.

However raw coercion commands no allegiance excepting the pursuit of tyranny and so the mask must be played out as part of winning the war-game. Without the mask, there is no war. Only relationships of creative challenge and conscious endeavour.

The propagating of dissension in 'either/or' generates polarised extremism at cost of discarding willingness and functionality of relationship and communication. For this is the condition in which the false can not maintain its illusion of credibility.

This calls for pausing of self-righteous reaction and allows observing the nature of our reaction and what is driving it. Personal identity either serves or obstructs our true self, and conflict is the diversionary distraction by which to not recognize what is in fact going on.

Engineering self extinction

FDA Pushing To Regulate Homeopathy Out of Existence?

An article on Green Med Info

My comment:

Asserted ' scientific truths' used as weapons by a sickness racket pretending to serve health.

The politics of sickness as a vector of control extends globally through every aspect of our biology of body-mind and environment. It does this through corrupting cells and capturing regulatory systems and natural defensive capabilities to operate AGAINST its host.

When an idea runs rogue in the body politic, it seeks out and kills all that might threaten its survival. Thus the fraud is often the loudest voice shouting quackery! Or the gullible are set up and triggered into enacting an agenda by which they believe themself superior, special, advanced in their career or remuneration or protected from otherwise adverse events or conditions.

Those who have no eyes to see, will not see. War or willingness is a choice. But war dictates and frames choices only to perpetuate its agenda. Truth is sacrificed to the 'god' of war.

Militant 'believers' in science are not practitioners of a willingness and curiosity to uncover truth. The model has become a power base by which to predate upon and exploit, that operates a much more pervasive tyranny of "church and state" than the Vatican ever could. But the real tyranny is within our own thinking. What is projected and reflected as a sickness of humanity upon ourselves and our world is the result of a kind of false parasitic thinking, in which fear subverts and replaces integrity with 'war thinking' - with an identity founded upon and embodying conflict.

International 'trade' agreements such as TTIP are being set up globally to subordinate sovereignty not only of national governments relative to corporate agenda, but of our biology to the likes of Monsanto. There is no way to see this being enacted in our midst while sucking on the worldview of a manufactured and managed identity. Apparently protected from its deeper fears but actually  being manipulated through them.

Therefore the correcting response is to uncover and face our fears so as to no longer be suckered into coercive and manipulative deceits posing as saviours.

"Yes it works in practice - but does it work in theory?" !

Empiric medicine was engineered out of the medical profession by Rockefeller Carnegie money and malice working through the funding and setting up of teaching facilities.

Oh look up something like prozac fraud if you really think the wolves are not wearing scientist's clothing. "Unreason' is within the distorted thinking of the corrupted establishment - not out there in conspiracy nuts and quackery.

" It cures. So what! Is it patentable? Now you are talking.... Multiple side effects? - a revenue stream. Peer reviews and FDA approval?  - We have established a network of trusted individuals in all the right places. Media? - Yes we can set the narrative. Opposition? - People don't really know what they want. We can help them recognize their true interests via any number of proven strategies. We own the opposition. Lies? - There are no lies in war and war is the name of the game in which losing is the only sin. Truth? Its what you make it, son - now listen to me...."

Scientific prostitution to corporate coercion

Real Tragedy of 'Science': Public Faith Declines as Fakery Grows

A Daily Bell article on false peer reviews uncovered in scientific prostitution to corporate coercion.


- - -

A Consciousness Perspective:

Identity theft is nothing new. Truth is not 'out there'. Insofar as anything true is 'out there' it is recognized through one's own truth.

As Consciousness is accepted as our Ground Reality there will be no need to manufacture or employ 'truths' as weapons of leverage and control because truth will be self-evident and beyond question or conflict.

In the mean 'minded' while, any form of anything is meaningless (or means anything and nothing) because the meanings given to things reflect a false or conflicting identification as the 'doer' or 'controller' of consciousness. This is self-illusion or vanity of ignorance and arrogance. Nothing worthy or sane can come of it save the recognition and release of what we are NOT.

Science predicated upon materialism already asserts metaphysical notions that filter and distort receptivity to truth. Of course many notions operate true within their specific range of focus and provide frameworks of intervention into existing patterns of relationship. When enough people agree, their mutually reinforcing definitions operate as currency regardless whether they share true value or pass off toxic debt in place of true worth.

"I" me and "self' are shorthand symbols for facets of the operation of will, but when will is usurped by conditioned belief, it operates the illusion of freedom under the tyranny of fear. What is given power to, becomes power over the giver, because it is asserted and believed true.

Hiding a lie or hiding in a lie may be 'justified' by the narrative of the liar - such as not publicizing information that reflects badly on one's institution and thus give ammunition to the perceived 'heretics' who must at all cost be prevented from gaining influence. But that has nothing to do with science as a discipline of uncovering the (already) true. It is simply the idea of war upon the hated self.

The egocentricity of the segregative or separating self is implicit in the use of the term self, in most usage. But corruption operates upon something true or it would have no meaning as corruption. Corruption begins with taking self-image over true relation and protecting it at cost of truth. It operates a mask or deceit by which NOT to know what in fact one knows. It splits the mind. It plays apart as if oppositional and separate, and seeks the validation that only real relationship offers by joining in forms that mimic aspects of unity without actually joining or relating with anything beyond its own strategy.

Recognizing 'out-of-true' is the opportunity to true up. NOW. Blame operates to divert from truing up, punishment to forbid it - save through long diversionary 'processes of change' that effectively kick real change into long grass while engaging hypocrisy (acting). Tyranny is first within the mind of refusal to embrace and embody change (life). Freedom is an inside job - an 'in-place' shift of perception and perspective that uncovers an already freedom which had been 'given away' to a dream of power and self-specialness. But freedom cannot truly 'leave you' at the level of your true nature - though one can actively deny it in assertion of imagined right to override true nature. We are free to war within ourself if we want, while it gives us something we believe we need or want enough to pay the price.

The baby in the bathwater is the uncorrupted service of science to true uncovering of Who we are and what Life Is. Because one begins from a false foundation there is a necessary revisionary shifting as a greater perspective illuminates the error of one's starting place. However, the inspirational movement to follow one's joy of discovery and gifting of talent in service of life is itself pure - even if imperfectly appreciated within the framework of egocentric identity and drives.

Faith in illusion?

Monsanto Laments Dwindling Faith in Science

The Daily Bell comments on the memes - on the current ideas - being propagated or incepted in the body politic. I recommend reading the article and some of the comments.
http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36120/Monsanto-Laments-Dwindling-Faith-in-Science/


The term 'faith in science' is an interesting term to choose.
Conscious faith is accorded what is accepted true of oneself, but blind faith gives power to ideas as ideals and indeed as idols.
That which is accepted true is given protection and investment, and the wish that distorts perception to serve the purpose of the perceiver is the ego-centric identification within attempt to 'control' reality; to exercise power over Consciousness, Life, Self and Other. This is not at all obvious to a mind that is designed to hide its power behind a sense of limitation, deprivation and lack. And it is impossible to convince such a mind that it is suffering delusion excepting by waking as the perspective upon illusion. This occurs spontaneously when the illusion disintegrates as a believable reality. When one's experience increasingly calls it into question and reveals lack of foundation where once seemed solid.

Clarifying our definition reveals a greater perspective. I use the term 'scientism' as distinct from the discipline of Science, I also see technologism as the inevitable effect of materialism - the materialism which operates as the active denial of Consciousness whereby to assert personal power upon a 'dead' universe in which death is the only natural outcome and where a kind of living death substitutes for real relationship. Materialism in this sense gets or sucks energy from relationships that it actually does not recognize AS relationship - because materialism ONLY sees relationships as a means to GET from.

The search for truth or the willingness to receive its illumination, can operate on many levels - all of which converge in a genuine willingness and capacity FOR relationship - because truth is a relationship and not an 'object' to be possessed, or used as a means of gaining control or power OVER Life.

The worship of coercive power is the religion of materialism. Everything derives its meaning from the god its serves for such is the nature of Source - or for what is accepted as a true foundation from which to live. And so 'science' as a tool of power is not concerned with true - but only with the power to make or subvert truths to its agenda. And to obfuscate its actions within complex layers of defence and diversion.

I look forward to rediscovering Reason and Science in cultural renewal, as a result of the deconstruction and exposure of the mind that would manipulate private or blind agenda at expense of the whole - including its own true interests. This exposure is not 'in the world' though our minds are reflected there. Deceit projects the unwanted and the rejected out from self onto world - where it may battle it or study it or engage in any form of apparent relationship with it, as long as it is kept apart and away.

A human world that poisons and destroys itself while engaging delusions of grandiosity and abject powerlessness is an expression of faithlessness - of giving faith to that which undermines integrity - which dis-integrates, segregates and struggles for power to 'survive'.
This 'self' is insane or operating from a 'disconnect'. Once one SEES it, withdrawal of investment is inevitable. Therefore it operates deceit by which to seem to provide power and protection. Divisions of conflict, fear and doubt trigger existential fears that call upon the re-enactment of the separation or split consciousness. This technique is so over used now that it too is wearing thin.
The mind - in the sense I am referring to the split-minded consciousness, is a trickster; an evasion, an attempt at denial or refusal of Life as Relationship, Communication and Creation of such extension and embodiment of presence. Refusing division is being of one mind by abandoning the drama of self - that is by pausing to listen or receive. The term 'higher mind' points to inspiration, intuition and discernment. Use it or lose it. But one cannot actually disconnect from the Consciousness of which one exists. One can only generate the experience of disconnection in subjectivity to power now seeming outside of and generally hostile to oneself; materialism.

No Big Bang

One of many articles positing Big Bang may not be demanded by alternate model of Universe:

Big Bang Didn't Happen? New Theory Suggests Universe Has No Beginning, No End




The model is 'all in the mind' - albeit in broad mutual agreement. I am in no doubt that Reality is Mind and that any holographic microcosm of Mind can yield or release its personal identification investment in mutual definitions and know - and I say know - Existence with no shadow of doubt or interference of any kind. But One - any one cannot share or give or communicate any facet OF Existence but through some degree of self definition in relation to the aspect of Existence that is moving as the focus of current desire. However, self-definition is not necessarily exclusive and indeed is free to shift perspective - infinitely. A Universe of Living Information or Communication that extends the Time-less Infinite as Idea is not 'inside anyone's skull'. But materialism diminishes Consciousness almost to want to render it obsolete - excepting as a leverage of technologism that in fact turns out to be directed by a private personal agenda after all. This is evident in cultural, social and political thought and consequent behaviour.

It really is a matter of perspective. But the mind of 'command and control' has science derailed from its desire to uncover truth into a presumed neutral and verifiable determination of truth. But all of it is model which may serve some purposes and hinder others.

The alarm bell for a scientist or seeker of truth in any kind of approach is the symptoms that reveal a biased agenda. When science identifies institutionally it has an ego and can be seen to operate a self protectionism of the establishment. Believing neednt be a weak attempt to hold something true to ward off self doubts. For by belief is experience of had. The key - I feel to offer, is to stand in one's belief as one's presence extending as willingness to relate or communicate as part of an ever new appreciation. The belief is a decision in consciousness that operates more as a navigational pathway or channel of communication than as a shield or sword.

But the core Idea of violence as Creation is deeply embedded into the traumatised collective human consciousness and colours everything until it is observed instead of running a program unnoticed. The Idea of no time or timelessness - from which and in which EVERYTHING that is, is and is known to be in the Mind that it is OF, offers a release from the limiting, splitting, warring, mentality that has characterised the human condition for millennia and yet is a conditionING that can be observed and released for a more joy-aligned choice. This is not anti-science for joy is also our genius or more aptly, a channel through which Life Shares Meaning. Of course one can turn one's back on joy and make sacrifice of consciousness, the 'creation' of a self-sense in its own power, but never free of grievance and vengeance no matter how one used magic and rationality to present otherwise.

So busy looking out because of fear that within is an invalidation of self. Its a kind of scam. But one has to extend a true worth to regain one's own and that cant come from a wishful or fearful foundation.


To this line in a comment to the article:

“Science has become polluted with emotion and politics.

We will pay a price for it.”

That elicited my reply:

I had an emotional response to this site deleting my longer reply to yours.  But a coercive hidden agenda operates through notions of purity just as through notions of rationality or indeed the wishful and gullible self-seeking for protection. The price of being out of true is lack of peace, grievance, limitation, struggle and suffering one's projections as if they are actually 'out there'. I do feel the 'church' of scientism is in bed with corporate and financial technologism and that it is a racket.


THIS COMMENT was from Rick to the article - not to me

Albert Einstein was a self centered, egotistic man who received credit for a lot of work he never did. In fact, his entire thesis or theory of General Relativity isn't necessary to describe how this universe works, because most of his work is entirely based on the Laws of Thermodynamics, force, and motion, and he never gave credit to Sir Isaac Newton.

My reply is to Rick's comment:

But he has been iconized and is now embedded in a directed 'history' that most everyone presumes to be genuine currency - and once people think they know and like what they think they know - they don't want to know. But not everyone, so thanks for your comment. We are all containing an ego-centric aspect that can often disguise itself in terms of respectability or acceptability. I don't feel to invalidate a human being as if to validate myself - NOT that I see you doing that - but it so often happens that we like to be right about the wrong we see exclusively or predominately in another. As I do not originate myself I cannot have an original thought - but I can extend a willingness for communication that does not mask a hidden agenda - to the best of my current ability. Passing off as something one is not is an expression of ego substitution for a genuine life. But in making mistakes we CAN become aware of poor choices and so come to better ones.

Rick came back to me:

I don't feel a person needs to invalidate another to advance an agenda either. The fact is he was ego-centric and self centered as his relationship with his wife and children clearly shows. In so far as the rest. The fact is Newton's Laws of Thermodynamics are all that is necessary to create and demonstrate exactly how our universal model functions, and also disproves Einstein's theory of General Relativity.

In conversation with Rick:

Societal norms brought out the egotist in many males in many ways. There is a dance between the individual and their conditioning that often fails to transcend it.
I don't know about your assertion on Newton. What's your take on WHY or HOW the establishment embraced and reformed around Einstein's passing off? (If it is clearly not true, what function is it serving?)

Does the subatomic 'Universe' fit the Newtonian model? I think not. If there is a clear benefit, then a perspective has that much validity for the beneficiary at least. However reputation without substance may seem a benefit but actually operates a disintegrity. So true is a matter of self-honesty. Without such foundation - there IS no foundation!

Corporate and scientific responsibility

"Boffins debunk magnetic field cancer link"



In the 1972 book 'pure white and deadly' John Rudkin blew the whistle on sugar. A scientist's career was curtailed as a result. (look it up).
So although it may be true that genuine science is being carried out and fully reported, the mere fact of billion dollar markets makes it likely that some of what is reported is as true as the scientific reports on tobacco were when it was first challenged as a health risk.

BIG money equals significant risk of corruption - doesn't it?
As well as this there is a vast userbase of wifi technologists who enjoys the facility and have become dependent on it in large degree who have an emotional investment in not wanting there to be any issues affecting them unless unequivocally linked. Of course there are adverse effects but these are not from the emf but from privacy, lifestyle and cultural effects.

Pervasive beliefs that technology brings harmful results have greeted most of not all new developments. Isn't that at the root of climate fear? Often the imagined harms are just that, and become laughed at, but the actual costs are of a different kind. One such is that we put more and more of our eggs into one basket - that is to say we become addictively dependent on external systems in ways that actually make humanity redundant - perhaps quite literally- as well as inviting power and wealth to consolidate in the way HG Wells foresaw in his Time Machine.

Fear often works as a self fulfilling prophecy. In a world of many pervasive hazards, one has to feel for the level of risk. Science as reported is not trustworthy - one still has to operate discernment unless one WANTS to outsource all intelligence to externally shifting paradigms. I've always distrusted margarine as industrial effluent and embraced butter as something humanity has been eating for millennia - although modern methods add all sorts of new hazards with anti-biotic drugs and gm crops to cattle - and maybe most of us with a healthy functioning immune system.... oh those few of us whose system hasn't turned against itself...can simply rebalance and detoxify as our natural resilience.

In principle science is the willingnesss and desire to dis-cover truth - which is already true by the way. It only focusses on the empirically material - which does not have a hope of embracing truth as far as I am aware of true - but that doesn't mean it isn't a useful tool - especially if it could be used for truly Cooperative Good instead of weaponizing, monetizing and medicalising Life to serve private agendas, in attempt to define, predict and control it.

Human consciousness is not absent from scientists - nor is is 'controlled' by them either.
Research into Electrical Universal paradigms is not encouraged - since Tesla and others. Perhaps maintaining scarcity is an essential aspect to controlling a system. Perhaps the weaponry of such technology is far too dangerous for what is after all an insane humanity suffering delusions of rationality.

I can postulate a future where the brain is found to be adversely affected in subtle but definite ways that increase and amplify an already sense of disconnected mentality that then presumes to need to control everything because it has lost all empathetic resonance of compassion and communication, with Life, itself and others, and so for those who are still allowed to have such faculty, a tin-hat will be designed to shield the brain.
I would rather imagine a future where life lived and shared in more intimate creative endeavour simply doesn't template such disconnect - and thus doesn't require all the kings horses and all the kings men to try to put it all together again.

Monetising Life

Economist Magazine Explains Why Economics Is Prestigious – But Gets It Wrong

Science itself has been hijacked by a 'superiority' complex, and resorting to esoteric mathematical complexity obscures the coercive mentality of 'understanding' only as a subset of manipulation and control. This technologism is not for the 'greater good' excepting to gain initial acceptance. It operates a wolf in sheep's clothing. Technologising Life, weaponising Life, medicalising Life, monetizing Life, and limiting and dividing it in such a way as to operate as a coercive will or power - SEEMINGLY outside or apart from Life. An 'alien will' that seems to come between the Life you are and share and be, to suck upon its life in order to SEEM to exist - AND confuse you with such as life as if it were your OWN - and thus given protection though it cuckolds all that is true.

Science truly is the free discovery of the true, but has been conditioned only to focus with mechanism at mechanism as if nothing is in Mind. But "watch out! He's behind you!" as they shout at pantomimes.

The hidden hand of competition sets all things apart from true nature and determines how the world works, for who owns and designs the system of money supply and media information and war and surveillance capabilities (and etc) consolidates itself to prey upon all who think they are themselves a power. And it does so through the mind. Through the back door - from below.

A hacked mind - not really by 'others' or by 'dark forces' though these too can be experienced. But in all honesty we leave it open and unguarded to be 'used' by ideas that are not true of us and which then program our identity in the same way as we see the world at large being a competing of manipulations rather than a process of communicating.

Sovereignty of will is not coercive imposition of fear upon the mind, but is of a true foundation.

All things come from Source. Definitions may extend the Creative or they may spell trouble.

Without a true foundation, all is bedlam. Which suits the most focussed and audacious manipulators.

Life is a process of synchronicity. The world we meet is not the One True World. We make choices. But if we choose fearfully, we do not realize our choices make us and the world we experience in such a way as to not know the choice in which we operate. Fear operates denial. All psychological defence mechanisms can show the basis for why people behave psychotically and neurotically - and why mental ill heath is normalized - much like the term 'sinner' was but without any trace of God.

Adulteration of currency begins when one makes image or definition of Life, and takes one's self seriously.

True knowing can read the energy of the present and make probability predictions - knowing that the prediction itself changes the probability. But we are now in a such a state of unknowing - that anything is asserted to bolster and maintain the appearance of credibility, authority and right to rule. Fear is the realm of the lie.

amanfromMars commented:Quite so, binary. I concur and would posit that there can be, and therefore most definitely must be and is, an app and simply complex programming project to make greater use of that knowledge in a better beta direction than is presently being pursued and supported by dumb ignorant media channels and current delivery systems admin of fiat paper money control, now reduced and elevated to the electronic transfer of virtual digits to a computer near you.

My reply:

The app that runs a distortion of virtual overlay is faithful to its dumb urge to protect via command and control in isolation, but force quit it and behold the unfolding of an undistorted expression of creative endeavour.

Otherwise every green shoot is 'infiltrated/infected' so as to be subverted to an arrogance of ignorance. Even a glimpse of the wonder and beauty - the Loveliness of Life - offers a basis from which to challenge or question the programming of fear and debt - based leverage.

amanfromMars :

"an undistorted expression of creative endeavour"

            Hmmm. At best, and whenever IT is quite different as I allude to such as being presently readily available for current power supply demands and needs today, would be somewhat heavenly, binra, with ....... well, the AAA++ Anonymous Autonomous Active levers of Creative CyberIntelAIgent Command and Remote Virtual Control in sublime attendance.

            Finding intelligent enough partners who can cleverly engage and provide necessary output to input and input to output for enhanced reinforced lead in patently novel and noble directions is the magic which drivers the programming and its future protocols and project parameters.

            Fortunately though, is IT intelligently designed so that one can if one so chooses, go it alone without having to rely on the good gracious help of others into similar fields of absolutely fabulous endeavour.

My reply:
Birds of a feather flock together. Vibrational resonance determines the 'others' with whom you CAN communicate or meet. Generally speaking the fear that something wont work out generates the attempts which ensure that the fear comes true.
Though true and false have no degree, Humankind mostly lives under a measuring stick of what is real or true and what is less real or less true. One does not have to wait on conditions or others to be true to oneself - that is to accept what is true of you and refine or abandon what is not. Refining or indeed abandoning definitions that don't work - or bring an experience that you say you don't want, is the key of freedom to turnabout whatever felt to be locked. The roots are in our own willingness of our own experiential honesty. That such an honesty wouldn't then find expression and extension in cultural expression on all levels is impossible. But human thinking or mis-identified wishing, always tries to put the cart before the horse.
Hopefully humankind is coming to realize that Inspiration is not something to impose upon others, but that the willingness to embrace and act from our own is the capacity to meet and communicate with others. One cannot have an experience of which one is not equal to.
Underneath all of the descriptive account of HOW humanity sabotages itself is simply the active denial of true worth. If you can feel this, you know that your own contribution will either stem FROM such disconnecting sense of self, or witness to its undoing in a true sense of creative endeavour. Everything we do is creative endeavour if we are awake to the wholeness or presence of the moment at hand. The power of the mind is recognized by manipulators - but they don't realize it costs them their true power to use it thus. Official orthodox 'reality' is an identity that then defends and asserts to maintain itself. You are clearly willing to step off the edge of such worldview so as to expand the model - but at some point one needs to go native and release the 'command and control' mentality altogether.
Life actually works the way it works - but human ego then overlays its own commentary and has an experience of being "in control".
Sign off with a Dylan line: "Ain't it hard when you discover that, He really wasn't where it's at, After he took from you everything he could steal".
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bobdylan/likearollingstone.html
Bottomming out is part of releasing what doesn't work. (doesn't belong in our mind's acceptance).
We cannot take that experiential learning away from anyone but we can be a communication that listens, joins with and honours, that which thinks it thinks alone.

Beneath the theoretical physicist

Michio Kaku presents himself as a theoretical physicist and an entertaining storyteller.
I did not feel his story - as he told it, to be truly of a new paradigm so much as persisting a scientific story about science and about humanity that speaks of hubris and a disconnected ignorant and arrogant self-definition. I didn't  feel to merely offer critical perspective and then felt to offer an introduction to consciousness-existence that is largely using Bashar's 4 Rules of Existence.
- - -

Existence Is! Always is. Only Is.
What is Is?
One in All - and All in One.
Holographic Consciousness.
You are That. That Is You.
What you give out is what you get back.
Such is the ever changing by which Existence knows itself ever new. Each moment is unique assemblage from Infinite probability. Whole and without beginning or end.
There's simply no time in which to describe this!
But it is being you now and now.
No one to speak it or take heed. Creation has no 'other' to 'discover it' but only its own Extension of Consciousness that IS All That Is being known, knowing itself existing. They are one, knowing and being known are not two.

To seek what you are without extension (that knows Itself through the act of creation) is to ask what you are NOT to show you what you are. If this is what really matters to you then here is your material tangibility by definition. This focus of experience is your gift to the All. What matters to you is what your desire and intention manifest as the One within the All. You are as free as the Infinite that thought you, but in choosing limitation you operate within the chosen definitions BECAUSE you choose them still.

Every perspective is valid but what resonates your core signature vibration is true for you. Accepting Only what is true for you, gives only as you receive. This releases distortion and welcomes the Unified and unifying purpose and synchronicity that Is Creation in extension.
All that changes is of vibrational charge and frequencies of resonance and interference. Big Bang is a point of view. The past is a present informational prism to the point of view it generates. There are infinite 'past's. You can marry your own mother in a parallel reality if that is really what you choose imagine and to be. At the most Intimate recognition, you can only meet your self - although this self is the recognition of the unique Creator light in all. 'It takes one to know one' and no one will see what they cannot yet accept or believe in themselves. The fearfully separated self sees itself in all ; a world of discrete things. Mind is impartial to and embracing of whatever is extended or projected. But if we give and receive limitation, conflict and denial, we do not recognize our experience as our gift, and struggle within the terms we set the measure of, our self.

Someone commented to the video comments:

Some animals do think about the future. Some bury food in the ground and go to pick it up months later....; that's an exampleˇ

I replied:

Humans think they are thinking of the future but it is simply an extension of their past - which they think happened before now, but is actually part of each instant of Eternal Creation. Complexity is used to hide in. Humans dive deep into the rabbit hole and then - upside down - think they are discovering. Animals and true humans don't need to think - just being contains all they need to be where and what and how they need to be with everything else. No job for scientist here. Not likely be discovered ;-)

Science as rebellion?

The Institute of Art and Ideas - offers a rich and exciting willingness to question, to revisit or revise our ideas and our world with new perspectives.

Science is Rebellion
Our knowledge, like the Earth, floats in nothingness, but this does not make it meaningless, says pioneering quantum physicist Carlo Rovelli; it actually makes it more precious.

- - -

Blessed are those whose intuitive faith challenges their experience, because our experience is a constructed reality of belief and definition, accepted true.

Believing is seeing, but of course what one says one believes is belied by one's actual experience and the inevitable reactions that automatically follow on from whatever interpretation IS currently operating.

The underlying 'revolution' is a separation device operating in consciousness whereby a mind seems to have become itself alone in conflict of identity and world in chaos that it takes as the basis to assume and assert power over itself and its world.

The intent to define and understand in this sense is an assertion of control imposed upon a natural order or relational unity that has been/is being temporarily disrupted by the separation device.

One can symbolize this and that's the way the older approaches to knowledge operate, in symbols that used archetypes to story the reflection of consciousness itself - that increasingly became disconnected from original context and became used more as modus of social control.

The reversal operates such that we become defined by our own conditioning, that is like saying we believe our own lies or fall under the spell of our own Word.

So it is appropriate that what seemed to 'get us locked into' limitation, conflict, and a disconnected sense that attempts to use its externally mapped world of others to 'fix or resolve or work out' its own 'salvation', validation, or however it so defines itself justified or complete.

Curiosity and imagination can be used to question the basis of our 'self' and its corresponding 'reality'. For not only is there no separate 'god' acting upon or coercing a Living Universe/Multiverse into existence, there is likewise no separate 'self'.

The layer or level of mind is but one facet and itself operates many levels at once - unconscious, so-called conscious, and superconscious - and we generally assert our surface consciousness to be ON TOP rather than notice it screens a selective focus of possibility from a vast range of probability of a truly infinite range of potential.

Human 'reality' is in some sense like a sandcastle upon an infinite beach - or a bubble in an infinite breaking wave - yet the power of the wave is in it, and the focus of the desire and intent that Life Know Itself guides, moves and supports it. For there IS no actual separation or disconnection from That which moves and gives form to the Formless. Nor can one use the vocabulary-ability of a separated self-sense to objectify or make coercive relation with it or under it.

Anything undertaken from the basis of a dis-integrating movement brings the reinforcement of a dis-integrated self and world; a self in pieces. Humpty the broken cosmic egg-o.

So yes; the willingness to accept that we do not KNOW operates to allow the Knowing that is the Communication of the Whole as the Part, and through the Part in communication extended and relationship embraced. The nature of Reality that is unchangeable is that existence is; and that the one is the all and the all are the one, and that what one puts out is what one gets back.

Such is Creation - not of a separate and separating 'god' but in God of God and as God - for That which Is is, but how you - as an integral expression of All That Is - choose to experience existence, is through the sharing of and in and as Idea. No way of experiencing - or rather - of being the gift-communication of experience itself is in itself more or less valid that any or instant or facet of Creation - not least because nothing is in and of itself alone and apart to be so judged. But what is or is not relevant and resonant to YOUR core signature vibration of focusing desire and exploration is natural to disregard in the creative unfolding of the revelation of ever novel ways to experience and relate and feel and know.

All 'self's' operate against their own Good when they are defined in misalignment with their true desire. Protecting the joyless by sacrificing one's joy is absurd seen in the clear. But the mind protects against being seen in the clear for fear of loss and of change of pain and loss, by which it has conditioned itself to survive against.

Coming back into alignment is also the uncovering of a greater clarity of purpose, of vision and of a more integral meaning from which to live and be. It is our natural inheritance from a prodigal exercise within 'as if' - for Source remains Is - and you Know "I am" as your own Indivisibility of being - regardless that the mind can play divide and rule upon its own models. 'What' anything is and how you choose to relate to it be seem to be conditioned and determined by a universe of cause and effect - but any of this can be challenged back to uncover its roots in the Word or definition/belief we put out - in the understanding that the collective agreements constitute a structure of experiencing that like a classroom, is not an authority to overthrow or a prison to break down - so much as a living framework of opportunity for teaching and learning in rich reflection and shared appreciation.

The mind of revolution/evolution can fade to the appreciation of mind as servant and instrument of truly creative freedom shared. It really is a matter of 'where we are coming from' rather than where we believe we have been and thus are conditioned to repeat round and round in revolving whilst ever struggling to evolve within such self conflicted futility.

Science is a valid exploration within the willingness to uncover truth. But without the love of truth there can only be assertions, coercions and war to establish the version that serves whatever it is that one is choosing to love INSTEAD. Consciousness is inherently responsible in the clear for it sees that it does unto itself. Questioning a version of consciousness that refuses to pause and open to revisit its foundations is not an act of war but of love, though not at first recognized such in a mind that believes division and control as the condition on which its own existence depends.

Electric Universe

An Intergalactic Light That Shines Too Bright
Scientist can't account for ionised hydrogen filaments in space within their 'dead' model of the Universe

The basic propositions of the "Electric Universe" take away all these dark matters and reveal the Universe in a New Light. The increasingly incomprehensible and meaningless contortions of outworn or outmoded scientific models are revealing themselves in refusal to question basic assumptions that express a billiard ball or clockwork mentality.
Along with that is the effect of such archaic mechanistic mentality as our guide in all things social, economic and political. That is - of using a mechanistic, coercive and disconnected mentality as the basis of our thinking. No surprise at the state of world affairs then…!


More info on the Electric Universe at
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/
or just search "Electric Universe"