Holding open the presence of the 'Field'

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/news-alerts-week-23-2020/

I choose not to give attention to 'BBC' or flashing clickbait ads.
I am indicating that disintegrity can be mapped out - without demonising.
Why the last bit?
Because what we demonise we assign and attach to as negative charged meaning, rather than disregarding as meaningless. I am aware it operates as an intent to assert and frame meanings - but I don't resonate with that set of mind as true.
Is 5G a weaponised attempt to physical isolation from our Greater Field of being? As a maintaining of the self-isolating lockdown of human consciousness under the mask of control set in fear of disconnect, pain and loss?
The mindset of control is itself a cognitive dissonance and seeks to mask out or deny its own dissonance - not least by projecting onto our relational world - our field of relational being.
If it were possible to pull out our own Created or Innate Connection so as to be safe in self-isolation set against change - we would do it - while our identity is invested in fear as protection, defence and salvation from the ultimately feared.
And so we self-destruct in all kinds of rigidities that become the structuring of our consciousness and world.

However, if the only truth in lies is our believing them and giving power by reacting from them as true - then the results of lies are merely the reiterating of a mistaken identity.

The Idea of the 'Field' as the true basis of the specific expression or embodiment is NOT the denial of the specific - but the context of its wholeness and being. Holding open the presence of the 'Field' - by any name, Name or simple direct and intuitive faith of the movement of our being - is the willingness to align truly - rather than set terms and conditions that become identified as a non negotiable set of demands. None of us wants to relive hated and feared experience - but if we are blind-set in conflict evasion as a way to buy time against a feared inevitable - then we actually bring it on by the very means of our attempt to 'escape' ourselves.
The idea of aligning true is innate to our being and not a morally coercive imperative set in OR ELSE!
But of course if we align against what we fear to be true we are already judging and reacting as if truth is what our judgement sets. The simplicity is that any willingness aligns the restored awareness of being truly moved - (which includes being stilled of conflicted thought and feeling) in place of a forceful attempt to move the truth, driven by fear and the natural instinct for protection.
I write this into the realm of the masking world, but every willingness to let Life In - as a movement through us rather than by a seeming capacity to deny and control Reality - is within the Field we all share - regardless the configuration of our self-definitions and strategies of survival. But if you had to choose Life to defeat fear or evils - it would not allow wholeness of alignment - by reason of the negatively demonised exclusion.
To choose Life just because. May become available as a real choice when some of the fear-driven narrative spin is released from our attention and therefore from our valuing. But Life Itself moves, when we no longer get in our own way.
The capacity to become conditioned by what we give attention to and make identity in by emotional reaction, is part of our consciousness that can as well be retrained to what we truly want rather than what we DONT want! But the temptation to reframe 'truly' in another version of a self-asserting narrative can operate without a moment of stillness of true discernment. In order to uncover 'true, I have to listen and look - with the heart - and in some instances recognise that some purported 'communications' are simply toxic by reaction - and so I watch my reactions and grow in a diversity of connections and reflections that reintegrate rather than persist a dis-integrity seeking to save itself in vain.

Nothing kills like belief made real at odds with our reality

https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/26/the-real-meaning-behind-dominic-cummings-breaking-lockdown/#comment-180489

Waldorf
A bit off topic, but Spain is reporting only one Covid-19 death today. I am sure they will be accused of lying, but it is remarkable enough to attract media attention elsewhere in the world. We may survive this thing yet…

Me

which thing – the novel pretext or the agenda of its activation?

Waldorf
Perhaps both? (I may be an outrageous optimist here.)

Ok. I like your expansion. I'll sketch my own.

Nothing kills like false belief made real and set at odds or in contradiction to our reality. So at what level is our life-time or 'living on' (survival), a belief or predicate of lockdown to self-isolation as a fear-bubble reality seeking control-reinforcement and defence-protection, and thus aligning under such props and stays as a 'normalised un-natural?' - or conditioned masking reality?

That is to consider that our experience of a physically externalised existence is itself a novel pretext or self-conceit running  the agenda of its active identification.

If that seems too unthinkable, simply consider that life and the source of life are timeless, and that our timelines are unfolding of perspectives, lived and shared as experience of love in distortions that extend to every kind of separation trauma - and every kind of strategy of masking over such fear in ways that reiterate and reenact it - under belief of self-exception - as those who know not what they do.

This used to be pointed to in Religious terms - such as 'All power is of God' - which then calls responsibility for the lens through which we each and together define and see otherwise - because for our own reasons we wanted to grasp or control the image and forms of life and gave them separate meanings in lust and loss.

Once we take on the lens of being a judge set over and apart from life - fragmentation sets the mind as a thing in itself, bubbled off from a Totality now perceived as total threat, instead of pervading timeless support.

The experiencing Reversal of consciousness is yet within Consciousness - and so truth is always with us, regardless how intensely we are driven to assert terms and conditions that effectively deny anything that would expose and therefore threaten the function of the masking identity in diversion, invested in as our Self.

In this sketch my sense of life is not illusion to be denigrated, as unworthy of its ideal, but a true desire in expression, filtered and denied true expression by unworthy ideals, set as idol or symbolic perfections - apart and over the movement of being Itself.

Regardless I cannot articulate this to anyone necessarily invested in drama, there will be an increasing recognition of core archetypes such as masked fear under mind-contagion, self-isolating sacrifice of relational wholeness for survival of masked life by denial of others, set as moral imperative.

To arrive at our starting place as the opportunity to know it for the first time, is the expansion to a Consciousness of wholeness that of Itself embraces the cast and the casting out, as the owning of our own denials under willingness for reintegration to unconflicted truth.

Of course this is a matter of acceptance of a love of humanity that may find little witness for justification, until we allow its extension through us in place of reactive identity. The choice for life as Miracle rather than socially manipulated outcome, is simply transparent to a Movement of being that is both life, and Source of life, un-separate. That the world or mind of time is resumed, is not going back to who we thought to be before. The experience of a love we did not and could not have manufactured, counterfeited or manipulated, cannot BE brought into the realm of eg0-separation and control. But such a self-and world can be experienced from new perspective or expanded recognition that opens to qualities of being that of themselves align creative and practical outcomes. Without the need to force and coerce systems of quantified and controlled substitution for a life deemed too dangerous to live and die in.

The idea of death needs redeeming from its role as a god of terror and destruction.

For the rigidity of the set against it is the fantasy of a grasped ideal or idol, held against change. 

The branch that bears no fruit shall be cut away. Rejoice in the restoring of the fruitful.

That may seem a tall order to invested identity set in conflict - but the release of false identity - one way of another - is the condition of the re-cognition and re-memebring within what identifies us truly.

Is a 'prison planet' being brought out of quarantine? Is Disclosure necessarily an encounter with great fear? The 'Shadow Play' seems to run in its own hermetically sealed bubble of a closed system - with all the meanings we give it...

Narratives derived from reality, sets the filters for imaging and defining reality. But narrative is 'Say So', a Telling, and a willingness to seek identity or Meaning there.

Narrative manipulations are so transparent now to any who are willing to allow the grace of noticing, from which we have a freedom to engage by reaction or choose to call the frame into question. This expands the frame or contextual perspective and allows a realignment of priorities to a current appreciation in place of old strategic agenda set in masking confusion.

If none of that registered. Be the life that you are ‘anyway’. Any way that survives as a quality of appreciation that of itself shares or shines.

Others may demand intimacy or communion denial, in the forms that meet their terms and conditions, But we can learn to engage in the forms of life in ways that extend worth, as a sense of connection beneath or behind appearances and presentations. And by giving, receive.

We give the meaning to our experience. But in giving what we DONT want, we set the measure of our own receipt. Setting the fear-contagion OUTSIDE, effectively locks it in, so as to then DO the thing we fear unknowingly, by defence.

Meeting our fear where it is, as the willingness to expand and embrace our conflict instead of seeking to repackage it onto somewhere or someone else.

The REAL meaning is given and received in the heart and is a unique exchange. False or partial meanings short circuits the heart as a mind in 'spin' upon its own inertial fulcrum. Spin doctors work to operate the corpse of a body of evidence set before or applied after the living fact.

Stepping out from the Covid-19 Mask

https://www.corbettreport.com/lockdown-open-thread/#comment-82798 

The Covid-19 Mask

by CC

You are a symbol of fear

That tries to force itself upon me.

You suffocate me and stifle my words.

You are a lie.

You are a symbol of submission —

Like a bridle on a horse

You break my spirit.

You make it hard to smile.

You hide me and make me lose my individuality,

Perhaps even a little of my humanity.

You are a barrier between me and the rest of my fellow humans.

Will I ever be free to breathe in the fresh air again?

There is another step from here now;

Full ownership and embrace of our masking persona.

I appreciate every step of willingness to connect within the feeling of being.

As the masking of a narrative forcing is revealed false

The inhibition of hate and hurt is the bridle on fight and flight.

But the freeze of trauma is the subjugation of love to a broken spirit.

If you would wake now I invite you to read the poem aloud - with conviction

and notice where your own integrity is sacrificed to a narrative set in lack and loss and powerlessness.

If you are connected at heart you will not choose to give acceptance to your own denial.

Set in the frame of being denied, hard done by and unjustly treated.

This world is a challenging life to live and a changing of parameters in which we find expansion and compression as the breath through All That Is.

That you feel as you feel is your freedom. I share in freedom with you - and choose my own measure of giving and receiving. In shared purpose we are of one mind. Time and space will arrange to serve. But in split mind we will always be out of timing. As time for evasion runs out - the split is brought to awareness.

You cannot war with yourself and win anything but a world of war to die in. And so using the moment of noticing as a call to joy or connected being - is undoing habit of a masking from our 'lie' as a willingness to be found in truth. New choices grow a new consciousness that is not predicated upon the old or set over and against evils, fears, hates and strategies of survival.

I wrote a bit this morning that may serve context - as a result of being baited by the mask and choosing to use the moment to serve a deeper connection:

The underlying dynamic we cannot and need not escape

https://doctoringthedata.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-underlying-dynamic-we-cannot-and.html

You are love - but have made of love something to be feared, or masked in shame.

Let it be a mistaken identity.

Be the curiosity you are born with!

Waking from a hypnotic suggestion

https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/07/watch-corona-crisis-what-really-happened-and-how-to-learn-from-it/

Yeah, really good video. I’ve seen a lot of stuff that convinces me there is no coronavirus pandemic. …. but yet, I’ve just spent half an hour washing a huge delivery from Asda.
The fear is real.

That's a recognition though. The reality is a fear-reaction identity being leveraged.

There is no real risk from covid 19 for 99.98% of us - and for the others - everything is a risk!

Intellectual understanding does not dispel fears - you have to accept it in your heart by stepping OUT from the lockdown of your own mind.

This is perhaps the GREATEST OPPORTUNITY of this event. To graduate from fear rehearsals into a willingness to incarnate.

(I know you are already born - but as a child we are undermined of a core trust of life and shut down in our innocent curiosity. But I state to you that these are covered over and not truly lost.

I don't say you should do this break your habit, I invite you to open any moment of simple curiosity about your fear and move with what you recognise and accept. Then you are not trying to fight a part of yourself that is in fear - regardless of what anyone thinks.

This fear is not 'new' it is simply targeting fear you already had. Now you are in touch with it.

If I had a vision for the future of Humanity, it would have to include regaining responsibility for our consciousness - for our habit-reaction - and its polarising into conflicts.

The other thing that comes to mind.

If you are going to act for you defence in such ways as washing down the outside world before it can come in and become part of you, at least make it an act of self-love.

I don't mean narcissism, but because you care.

Fear does not care for you, but tyrannises you.

I am nearer 70 than 60 but see my risk as gov.thugs official or otherwise because I don't buy the story or give attention to the tellers. But I have met terrified people when shopping, and see still a lot of fear-conditioned distancing that isn't simply physical.

Terrified people can be vicious at worst and suspicious at best. There is no love in it - excepting to call on or seek protection from the very sources that triggered and fed the fear.

Hence to criticise their clapping or loyalty to those who are on some level knowingly and selectively destroying the economic basis of the lives of billions globally - is to be perceived as the virus itself!

I appreciate your honesty. And a release of judgements in me that helps me  in relating to so many who have in many ways entered another reality to me, though we walk the same Earth.

To be the love that you are is to align the reality that matches you.

You may not feel or think you are love - but how then could you feel betrayed or rejected or abandoned?

Broken love seeks to put itself together again with bits of wreckage and wishful magic.

Even those seeking control or dominion are seeking a substitute for the power and meaning of their lives where it cannot be found, and in ways that reinforce the driving belief.

Followup to an appreciation:

https://off-guardian.org/2020/05/07/watch-corona-crisis-what-really-happened-and-how-to-learn-from-it/#comment-166819 

I appreciate that a resonant connection has found you moving in response.

If we are invested in a narrative or mythic identity, then we are filtered by its interpretations. We all 'know this' in theory but that doesn't mean that we cant become engaged in our own doubts as a kind of internal battle acted out in our perception and response of a world.

Waking from a hypnotic suggestion is then the issue for any of us who have effectively 'taken the bait' of identifying in reaction to our narrative as true, rather than awareness of a story as a story. The collapse of identity into character is both an extraordinary capacity to experience our own present through the lens of an imaginative supposition or premise - and to forget or lose current awareness of a presence that is open ended and infinite - not in the sense of big or small, but as a quality of connected potential.

The capacity to persist a dream even while being communicated with from a truly current calling, is of interpreting everything of the shared relational world in terms of the dream. Likewise those qualities of our being that are on the cusp of awareness are brought in like new wine into old bottles to further support our narrative identity - instead of serving a true and spontaneous renewal.

The taking up of insights and good ideas as leverages to make a better dream always operates the same underlying premise of a subject separated or singled out within a creation that is set in and of a sense of lack, limitation and conflict - to be solved, overcome, escaped, or understood so as to define and control - but still from a point set in judgement over its narrative creation, that seeks reinforcement of lockstep with others, to generate systems of support or leverage by which to overcome the evil which each sees in different shadows or perhaps in the same target but for different reasons.

I used the term dream here, but not to demean or dismiss our human experience.

The creative imagination is a gift of infinite potential - regardless the use to which it is put. Given to a capacity to generate conflicted fear that feeds on itself to generate an inertial fulcrum operating AS IF separate, locked down and locked into survival mode - that by its very nature shuts down higher 'instant evolutionary' potentials of connections, communications and synchronicities.

Now why would anyone coming across this in the middle of a sporting match see it as ANYTHING to do with winning the game? While a game is worth the candle - we give it our light to play out. Leaving or dropping the game in truth has to be willing to alight in what is worthy, instead of seeking to persist in a futility as if 'this time it will be different'. But the experience of releasing the familiar - or the devil we know - as an active faith without conditions or expectations, is fear of loss of self in the terms of control.

But how much of such control is gotten FROM a fear running as if a thing unto itself - but then choked back or locked down and used as a prop?

And ... do you WANT it?

Is this game worth the sacrifice of a greater light - or is it timely to alight in a releasing of stories to reveal their blessings  instead of the attempt to imprint new stories on the destruction and demonisation of the old?

A true blessing is simply shared life - or shared resonance in life.

When we frame blessings in a sense of self-specialness, or indeed curses, we are choosing to give our light to private mode - in which a truly shared reality is muted or put on snooze so as to pursue the experience of our thought and imagination.

Your gift joined in bring this posting. Resonant energy is integrative and synchronous.

patterns of negatively polarising conflict are no less synchronous, but are experienced as mistimed and misinterpreting breakdown of communication. In other words we don't really LEAVE the 'field' so much as generate compelling experience of what I generally refer to as separation trauma - and all the strategic defences that rise as reaction to lockdown an infinite potential in a net of polarised stagnation in which nothing true can move.

Beam me up Scottie !

;-)

Viagra 'cures' heart disease?

A comment on Kendrick's blog :

Moving on from all the diet hypotheses and to a different field as suggested by Dr. Kendrick : How many of us remember the post on Viagra by Dr Kendrick earlier this year and how it reduced CVD attacks. By way of evidence here is a link to Swedish study of 47,000 men all less than 80, none of whom had had an MI at the start of the study.

http://heart.bmj.com/content/early/2017/03/14/heartjnl-2016-310746Conclusion : Viagra prevents heart attacks ! And more is better !
And bugger me : none of them changed their diets at all !!
🙂
Also Dennis Mangan has also just released a post on the impact of Viagra as an effective anti-aging ‘supplement’.
http://roguehealthandfitness.com/will-viagra-and-cialis-extend-lifespan/Usually Dennis always includes recommendations about changing diet (paleo preferred) in his posts. But not this time. He’s keeping it simple.
Now this is interesting. I wonder though if there are any studies of women using Viagra tp cure CVD and whether it is beneficial for them also.

I looked at viagra side effects on web md. I don't usually use of the phrase side effects. They are direct effects of generally unwanted consequence.
The idea that viagra cures CVD strikes me as wishful at best.
A failing heart can be kept alive longer by various manipulations. An artificial one can 'outlive you'. That is not to say there is no place for tinkering, but the idea of holding back the consequences - often by redirecting to different areas of the body - or in the collective sense, by redistributing to different facets of society and the environment - is exactly the pattern I associate with the pharmacological approach.

I agree that it is NOT the doctor's job to TELL patients how to live, whether by claiming higher authority, or by morally guilting them into compliance. In theory, this may be  why corporately owned and directed technologism cultivates and feeds upon the right to engage in egocentric and illusory 'freedom' at expense of the health of ourselves and of society. Of course 'scientism' is being used to enforce the extreme dictate of such 'choice' in the state sanctioned illusion of 'immunising' and attaining 'herd' compliance and conformity.

But I DO hold that anyone who has any alignment in health as a living balance rather than targets and check boxes, will look for and take the opportunity to reflect where poor choices are bringing poor results, and inspire the willingness to align in better choices. This does not only help the situation at hand, but grows a relationship of informed choice within relationships of trust. Lots of people submit to 'experts; because they do NOT want responsibility.

Taking responsibility for our life is very stressful relative to running on auto under a managed environment. Yet the stresses that disempower us are those that deliver us unto evil. The irony is that true responsibility does not call upon guilting or blaming, but enquiry and recognition by which to make better choices. But the apparent 'escape' from self-responsibility is deeply predicated in blame.

When one can assign the fear of blame to any official diagnosis - you  become 'real' to the medical system instead of being fobbed off as all in the mind  - which is then invoking fears and doubts of one's sanity while not being seen or heard, and both of these work together as a social rejection.

This really is about where we assign and accept authority. I believe the heart knows. But to align in this is to release what seems true in a mind of dissociation. Many prefer to die, than question and release self-asserting judgemental certainties. On the other hand, many find the willingness to release judgements in their dying process. Why wait?

Rising self-disgust and rage

My Fellow Americans: We Are Fools
by Margot Kidder, via Information Clearinghouse

There is something I am going to try and explain here after watching the Democratic National Convention this evening that will invite the scorn of many of my friends.  But the words are gagging my throat and my stomach is twisted and sick and I have to vomit this out.  The anti-Americanism in me is about to explode and land god knows where as my rage is well beyond reason.

My comment:

I celebrate getting in touch with the feelings of self-disgust and rage that comes perhaps from powerlessness or indeed terror - for such are the fruits of an undercurrent insanity that rises from the deep to break the dream of a power or self-specialness that never was.

I do not want to give suppressed and denied emotion the trigger finger to any harming of myself or others but feel it and use it to generate the desire and receptivity for a true sanity of being - instead of being negatively defined in reaction to the denied and projected or unacceptable self.

It is never truly the people who are culpable so much as the definitions and beliefs we or they are operating out from unknowingly. For everyone seeks their good as they define it in relation to what is happening - even if to choose what seems the lesser evil. And that is my point; the definitions we operate under determine our selective perception and thus the reactions and responses that automatically ensue. That is why 'controlling the narrative' is powerful - because it frames reality in ways that block, distort and filter it to ensure outcomes aligning with a pre-set identity.

So without denying the feelings of hatred that arise, I invite a voiding or releasing the corrupted in the renewed or awakened willingness to uncover the true. Because what is out-of-true with us can only generate dissonance and conflict while we try to make it true or fit into its framework.

Recognizing oneself in the 'negative' is meeting the extreme need to get rid of it - but if we project it onto hate-objects we merely hide in "self-righteousness". My invitation to feel - in a safe context as can be found - and in a willingness to be found in or aligned to a deeper Sanity, is that there are core beliefs and self-definitions beneath or within the feelings - ie: beneath rage is hate, and beneath hate is hurt and beneath hurt is a love denied - and all of these layers have 'story' of separation trauma that runs undercurrent to our surface world - and is active regardless of being air-brushed 'out-of-mind'.

Waking up is a Re-Integrative Willingness. But it isn't the special one or the righteous judge or empowered warrior who awakens to the true movement of their being - it is the Movement Itself - finding a way through you because you are no longer so completely locked into the dynamic of conflict as the means to establish your identity.

If your identity 'breaks' then it is not the true of you - and in fact you are free - and needful - to uncover the true of you beyond the dictate of a world gone mad.

Can we fool ourselves? Yes of course - to the degree that we WANT to. Why would we fool ourselves? To evade, escape, overcome or hide from a sense of self that we hate or fear.

Yet I don't believe our truth is fearful so much as what we have 'made' of it. The 'mind' is used to self-differentiate in guilt and fear of exposure. But our uniqueness is a signature of our Creator - regardless whether you use such a term for the Source or Cause beneath effects.

I don't write to persuade or be agreed with - but to offer reflections that may resonate to your own stirring recognitions - and serve your own unfolding discovery in your own terms.

It is not that the true of us is folly - but that we have become entangled and co-fused with fooling ourselves and fooling each other to make it stick - or find reinforcement and validation for such 'identity' - which is necessarily struggle for power position and inherently operates as a corrupting influence in the body politic - and co-opts its abilities and technologies to consolidate its victory in death. Because differentiating from Life has its logical conclusion in death - including the living death of a robot-like enslavement to a terror driven system.

Death - in the sense I use it here - is the refusal of the transformative and evolutionary expansion of Life. It may feel like a death to be broken in your 'self-reality' construct, but if you abide in willingness for Life - it will move you to recognition because it IS your will - your long denied will. The acceptance and embodiment of your true feeling being.

The communication of a deeper nature does not address your problems - but if you let it in as the feelings rise to acceptance and release, then it restores a fresh and living perspective from which to take a step in good heart... in a connected sense of worth. This willingness has to replace the sleepwalking template that is imprinted as our habitual 'mindset' and emotional conditioning. There is no rush to attend to the moment at hand - and no delay either. Your presence is invited to participate in the Embrace of Life on Earth... as you are freely willing to accept and align in.

What is Sovereignty?

What is Sovereignty?



(Written into an article on Sott.net)


https://www.sott.net/article/322133-What-is-Sovereignty#comment161045

What is Sovereignty?



The idea of sovereignty or free will, like any other idea, can be corrupted. Something else is being passed off as if it is freedom - and by that is true freedom lost - or rather covered over from a conscious recognition, appreciation and sharing in.

Identity defined 'in a body' or even equating self with body, and mind with brain, is a defined sense of self arising from conditioning - like a mask or spacesuit or interface by which engage in the human experience of the world as we tend to give 'Reality' to - in forgetfulness of the underlying focus in desire, meaning, image and idea, by which we 'make sense' of existence - of Fact of our Existence - AS a world - from which we then make or infer a self.

The freedom to desire and imagine - focusing within and through the ideas that resonate with recognition of the meaning we both have and are - and being moved as that consciousness of appreciation - rises from a depth of which the consciousness is an extension and vehicle of - and yet one with.

Nothing can limit imagination and desire excepting the meanings accepted and invested in as true of You - that are no longer your true desire or held true service for you in the past but are not serving who you feel and know yourself to be - now.

Self-concept - or a the association of concepts that comprise self-image - is a model. An inner creation drawn and woven out from a Whole Cloth through which to uniquely experience facets of a Totality that can only be experienced through some degree of differentiation within it - but never really apart from it.

Confusion of self, identity and expression, with the framework of self image, then operates as if from an exclusive sense of segregated self and experiences the reflected denials inherent in defending and maintaining its 'self' as experience of being denied, threatened and attacked - and ascribes the sense of disconnection and loss that is inherent to an exclusive identification - with this sense of denying, limiting, threatening or opposing 'otherness'.

In place of freedom to accept and live the truly felt movement of being - is now an imperative for survival in set terms that struggle and further reinforce the terms - so as to solidify a rigidity with all the emotional force of survival need believed - and lived out within a local or exclusive assertion of self and reality - as if this is free will - upon a deeper movement of being of which it is not only unaware of - but redefines as threat or asset to exploit.

The idea of sovereignty is rightly belonging not to power that 'lords it over' - but to the power that holds all things aligned in true balance. And as may be implicitly recognized in this reading by now - the sense and fear of losing balance leads to a coercive attempt to impose it - with sets action and reaction upon a false foundation of control against and over perceived threat - fragmenting under the worship of power unto itself as Meaning.

Nothing in this world can convince you, the truth of which you are unwilling to learn, though pain of meaninglessness may call to re-evaluate what is held true. This is your free will - for only from you comes your own acceptance of the true of you. In articulating this I have to acknowledge two parts - because the belief in the split operates the mind that thinks in discrete linear concept. The parental aspect of you needs to listen to and feelingly accept that which has been denied - for only in revisiting the feeling will a fresh take heal a mis-take. And the child fragment needs to embody, or give movement and expression to the denied feeling and thought - within a willingness FOR acceptance and healing - instead of reacting as the trigger finger to the baiting of heartbreak, rage or terror, of an ongoing oppression that disallows or demonizes and fears, the movement of being that is being pushed down or subverted and neutered within conformed dictate.

Because of the nature of pain, fear, hate and reaction, these can and do simply feed the same that operates the role of coercion - unless there is a deeper recognition and acceptance of the call that is within the behaviour and willingness to genuinely respond. Or - the negative or unacceptable expression has found acceptance and transformation in conditions away from triggering harm - so as to grow the capacity to bring communication of the denied self in a form more open to recognition and less liable to trigger being attacked or denied. Of course both these aspects work together - for you are not split by belief apart from believing it so. But the sketch I invite considering here is necessarily a tiny  facet of a much richer communication of being than our physically conformed mind allows - for the nature of Existence may project or embody through the prism of time and space but is not defined or limited thereby - excepting again through the proviso of the freedom to define and accept core ground-rules by which to explore freedom to experience within structures that enable and bring forth.

Just as with natural environments, there are cycles of change within the underlying matrix of meanings - that meanings can no longer 'survive' in without being renewed from Source so as to embody a current expression of being - freely accepted.

While in principle one is free to persist in the meaningless if one gives it the power of acceptance and belief - such freedom operates against the core purpose of extending and sharing meaning, worth or value recognized - as a freedom to refuse the current and use it as a means to support a static and unyielding concept of self.

Perhaps there is a mixed harvest of those who come to freely yield a false sense of control to an inner recognition of true balance within wholeness - and those whose self sense asserts freedom in defiance, opposition and revenge - righteously but blindly asserting as rage and terror both - for attack without a body cannot be but a relational breakdown of communication - translating and embodying into fixity of form. As conditioning generates conditions that then reinforce and complexify and mask 'mapped out denials'.

The forms of denial are so fragmented and multi-layered and imprinted as part of our identity - that there is no way to mind-map it all out and re-find our way - for the urge to map, define and control is already largely operating from and for self-concept  - particularly when invested in as an identity over and against false.

The quantum idea of collapsing the Infinite to a specific comes to mind. Do we feel out the pathways that truly align a truly felt desire - or allow a layer of subconscious and seemingly 'autonomous' thinking to condition and effectively control our unfolding of perspective?

Allow that any form and any thing can be used for self-deceit - or for the honest and open appreciation of who you are - which of course includes an honesty relative to all kinds of psychological defences that were inherited or needed as part of your personality and character development. Only feeling our way - in the currency of the moment and movement of being - will reveal and discern what we need to know or do in its right timing. The idea of manually living is absurd - no matter how complex the robot or system that rises to substitute for communication and relationship. The true nature of feeling, is richer in living and creative information than any conceptual overlay. Nothing within us need be invalidated or demonised when finding its right place. Priority is not coercive upon us - but when what is first is accepted first - all else finds its place relative to true.

Until an acceptance of unconditional love releases us of self-hatred and self-denial - we cannot but go forth and multiply the hate in the name of love - as self-righteous attempt to survive in our own terms - at cost of out-sourcing un-recognized and un-owned pain and hate onto others - and our world.

The idea of self has to become open to a greater communication - and the idea of group or nation or corporation has to embody such alignment. The history of nations and the modern history of corporations is an extension of the structure of coercive power that operates war beneath a masking narrative for unity, diplomacy and representation.

The true nature of globalisation is global awakening - and not a corporately enacted dominion by an elitism that owns and pulls all the strings whereby to control the narrative and enforce or en-trance conformity to its agenda and image.

At least - such is the willingness of acceptance from which I meet the world and through which I am met. But unlike the measure of power in the world - all power is in shared witness to the true - no matter how seemingly insignificant the form it takes. And of course we cant get our heads around that but that is why it is called Under standing.

Shock, disgust and anger

Life in a Modern-day Debt Colony: The Truth about Greece
by Michael Nevradakis



I recommend at least considering the article linked above for a perspective on Greece, the EU and a masked agenda that is working by design - and not one of encountering accidents or errors of negligence.


My input is into the article and shared commentary but placed it in the context of the last few words of  elentis who ended his post with:

...We must dare to finally speak the UnSpeakable and do this loudly and backed up by research. At least our fellow Europeans, the majority not in the feeding trough, deserve clear and true information. Believe me, the result of this information is disgust. Shock and disgust – and anger.

My comment:

"Shock and disgust – and anger".

These feelings are unlidded (within us) by events. All of us carry the lid of social civility that generates a mask of personae under which is the attempt to coerce outcomes in alignment with (at least temporarily) escaping or delaying the shock of a broken identity in self and world; the disgust of (and at) the hatred that is thus exposed in the raw, and the survival sense that denies and projects hatred to instead focus almost exclusively in a relative self-righteous justifiction - in which hate of OTHER is seen as absolutely justified and therefore replaces the love that is denied within the hurtred of hate and rage. And so we 'love' to hate and hate to love - for hate has made of love a victim - an invalidity - an un-reality.

I have attempted to sketch something of the imprinting of the human conditioning that 'sets' the human condition unless we feel through it to an expanded acceptance of embrace and perspective.

The hate that embodies an anti-Life globalism, hates the Life that - in its experience - failed it. There are different facets of separation trauma - but we all share in and embody such archetypes that are locked in polarized conflict of 'divide to rule' or indeed to rule out what we cannot bear or tolerate.

There can be no relationship or communication to a mind exclusively identified in vengeance or in terror. But only what is believed to be necessary and justified deceit and coercion - in the framing of the goal of power from which all else derives whatever use or meaning it is allowed to have. Power operates a false sense of protection - or rather a protection of an incomplete sense of self falsely asserted as an exclusive and authoritative power over its own experience.

And so terrorism - whether masked or in the raw, operates the act of the hate upon its own - as a coercive conformity to asserted and imposed 'idea' under which, the living will - the freedom to feel and move as one's being - is sacrificed and denied. The illusion of power 'paints itself into a corner' as checkmate! But the board is a two dimensional representation of a polarized oppositional identity.

If the illusion of power is unsurprisingly self-defeating - does it not invoke curiosity as to the true nature of power - or perhaps there is no term for it in a world so long entrained and enchained to darkness in which NOT being hit can seem like love.

When our hated, feared or denied feeling finds acceptance in the movement of its being - without being given reactive access to trigger harm to self and others, then a fresh take can replace a mis-take and a quality of compassion within ourselves can automatically and naturally recognize opportunities and willingness for communication and relationship hitherto unseen or discarded - in which the power of true presence is extended and honoured in place of a 'relational usury' that seeks to 'get validation from others' by offering a false presentation as substitute for the power it believes lost - and so does not rest in and share.

The inner recognition is not a strategy or replacement for integrity in relationship - but a questioning and opening of foundations so as to truly know and align in purpose - rather than be-guiled within evasions that feel justifiably compelling and necessary.

Is not tragi-comedy a gift of cultural inheritance from early Greek culture? Using the reflection to uncover recognition in which what seemed exclusive polarities are both owned - and instead of an overwhelm, we open the freedom to focus differently - to accept a different choice than a split compulsion.

How anything 'works out' is beyond me - excepting that what I write here has relevance to living a good step - from which a fresh perspective opens its own good or recognized guidance. This is so 'different' as to seem too difficult or indeed daft. But questioning our foundations in desire for true being is not in order to get a better handle on power and protection in the frame of the 'world' - but to receive and thus bring forth a 'different' world from what separation trauma painted and defended as our life.

Illuminating the 'checkmate' of a 'victory' by which life is made hollow and meaningless is part of growing willingness and desire for Life and for truth that is truly receptive and not pre-loaded with demands and conditions.

Our original nature can be covered over and denied - yet must first BE that denial can seem to operate a replacement. Denial is a part of focusing - but we do not have to hate or demonize the choice that does not resonate with who we truly feel and know or even prefer ourself to be - in order to live that freedom and learn of it freely. A coerced or conformed choice is no freedom to feel and learn and grow. The old world order replicates itself over and again as the dictate of a seeming 'separate' mentality - presented as if normal and self-evident - yet predicated on hate and fear and locked in by guilt.

I have only the English translation of the adaptation of Arnisi - used by Theodorakis in Sto Periagiali - I sign off with it in solidarity with and gratitude for an awakening Humanity.

Sto Periagli (Mikis Theodorakis) Based on (Arnisi) DENIAL by Giorgos Seferis

On the secret seashore, white like a pigeon (dove?),
we thirsted at noon, but the water was brackish.
On the golden sand, we wrote her name, but the sea-breeze blew and the writing vanished.
With what spirit, what heart, what desire and passion we lived our life:
a mistake! So we changed our life

[English trans : Edmund Keeley and Phillip Sherrard]

- - -

Richard Le Sarcophage wrote in a comment to the main article

I’m sorry, but the Stasi were there to protect East Germans from the horrors inflicted on Greece.

My reply:

I feel you are mistaken. The apparatus of Soviet state control - extending to making everyone a spy on everyone else - may have been initially 'justified' in terms of protecting against foreign terror threat - but operated to consolidate a power elite who masked in a 'collectivist' appeal at expense of the quality of Life shared - excepting of course, within the conformity of the official dictate.

The identifiction of 'sides' is unaware that deceit works both or all sides of opportune or manufactured conflict to influence outcomes in its favour, without seeming to play much part - except perhaps as saviour.

 I am not suggesting that protection is not required against deceits that carry heavy consequence - but that the very quick minded position themselves 'upstream' of events so as to operate 'insider' leverage by which they become defacto 'elites' making the decisions that frame 'the lives of others' who have little or no awareness of what is in fact going on beneath appearances - excepting they feel denied of their core humanity by a tyrannous dictate - but induced to blame and inflame their own divisions.

Likewise western 'intelligence' gathering is used for corporate/political advantage in globalist power struggle even though it was ostensibly to protect against the 'bad guys'. Corporate or mercantile power tends to be one foot (or many) in front of the attempt to check and balance it - but it is the consolidation of power that operates - for when transnational corporations have served their nation-destroying role, they too will be relived of any temptation towards undue influence or threat to the power dictate.

However, without the belief in the evil enemy - such society cannot remain ordered - for the inner conflicted purposes that are 'unified and displaced' by the dictate of centralised power rise up as a creative chaos through which a different way of living starts to come into focus than coercion and deceit.

However, I note that the terror that external power was supposed to hide or protect us from is leaking out everywhere now - so a 'creative chaos' might be the only option left. The creative is of course what we bring as presence to that which we find disturbing or unsettling. If we only fixate in anti-evil identities we let ourselves be defined over and against the thing we hate. Defined by hate is not creative freedom - even if ingeniously marketed and spun to a fear of change.

The nature of personal responsibility

To a poster who brought in personal responsibility as the key to any real healthcare:




I appreciate your joining in with this theme. The nature of personal responsibility is a key in all of the conflict and woe of humanity. Personal guilt and blame adulterates, corrupts and replaces awakened responsibility and bring coercion and deceit in as the hiding of a guilt and blame agenda.


So a genuine disclaimer needs to honour and address the potential or actual awakened responsibility in its readership rather than merely give unto Caesar as Caesar demands as its due.


Whatever we say - we have no control over what anyone else interprets it as, uses it for or does as a result of reading it. But we do have responsibility to our health and wholeness - our integrity of being - and this does not communicate carelessly or callously - but on purpose and in unified purpose.


Conflicted purpose or 'hidden agenda' communicates mixed messages. We may learn to align, integrate and balance by actions that reveal more about ourselves and our world as a result of living. Or... we fix ourselves into static assertions of identity and fight our corner by whatever means are deemed necessary according to the fix we are painted into.

In the market place is the phrase 'buyer beware' as a warning to be vigilant when trading, to check that all is as it is said or sold to be. This is no less true in accepting any ideas or perceptions - for deceit is pervasive when personal investment in outcomes overrides the way in which they are arrived at.

I see the corporate mask of technocracy that is currently running as determined to eradicate awakened responsibility or free willingness, so as to enforce conformity to a pseudo scientific 'system' of penalty and disincentive. That is - a fear-driven dictate - no matter how it is disguised or presented.

If people are determined and insistent of evading and escaping their innate responsibility, then they will give power to anything and everything that enables them to buy more time in which to persist in the identity they have grown thereby.

Accepting a sense of true worth is the first responsibility - because if a sense of self-unworthiness underlies all presentations of seeking, then well being cannot be had - or recognized if it leaked through.

The words cant really say what one's own being recognizes - but they can get in the way of recognition if they are read without also feeling within.

If you meant that a system of penalty should keeps everyone conformed to not being a drain on society then I say such a society is itself sick because it has no sense of doing what you love and bringing that into your relationships, and society as a whole. And if you cite instances of deprivation I can only say one has to start somewhere and grow the spark that a sense of self-denied would starve of light and life.
No one else can be your life - but if you don't hold true to your place - everything else will come in and rob you of it.

The device of demonizing operates hidden hate

Advice against eating fat was wrong. It is time the experts admitted it


My comment to the article above:

- - -

You might recognize that the demonizing principle jumps ship - such that we grow to become the thing we hate - unless of course we recognize hate as the driver of the demonizing device and choose not to use it.

I'm glad you are focusing on real food as opposed to the adulterated or heavily processed  'food' that suits the logistical and distribution and market capture 'needs' of corporate cartels.

The kind of carbs makes a big difference, as with fats. But also the effects of many pesticides and herbicides on our gut bioflora affects the ability of the body to metabolize particularly refined carbs. Pharma-harm also arises from anti-biotic, and most likely anti-anything. Quite apart from substituting for awakened responsibility.

There are positive synergies of benign influence as there are negative, and isolating co factors to assign magical healing or demonic powers is part of the attempt to validate and reinforce identity based in conflict - or it would not be driven so.

Our gut bio-genome is unique - regardless being an identical twin - and the effects of diet are also unique. Therefore we can only arrive at general guidelines with accommodation for diversity within them - for some thrive on what others cannot survive - and they do not need demonizing or invalidating for being 'different' to a church of technocracy in which the one true diet or any other freedom of discovery and association - is used to conform or negate all else to its model.

The corruption of science is the same patterning as any other corruption - involving institutional ego as an investment in fear of loss - that adulterates and undermines its true function. A diet of persistent fear makes hollow of Life - reducing consciousness such that only the impending breakdown of the model can catalyse awakening from a false investment.

A good teacher makes themselves obsolete - and healthcare is not about generating and ever larger capture of addiction to sickness management - so as to prove and justify investment in the model. But addiction to power operates beneath the masks of social or even personally accepted 'reality'.

Our environment includes our thought - and the tacitly agreed definitions or model of reality that we operate - largely unknowingly - generates the feelings and perceptions from which we tend to grow our personality strategies for surviving WITHIN such conditioned parameters. Science developed as a way of challenging cultural blinkers or belief-filters - but has become another church-state corruption.

The influence of cartels of wealth and power in key moments can and does direct or distort perception of reality. The lobbies that promoted the mistaken or fraudulent vilification of cholesterol and saturated fat found a key moment in Ancel Keys - who was a relatively unknown economist making associations that are like blaming fire appliances for causing fires because they are found at the scene.

But note the investment in demonizing anything is inversely proportional to the power that is then assumed and identified in self righteousness. Power in this sense is corruption from the outset. Science does not need engage in fighting un-truth so much as sharing in true communication - that is in honesty and transparency. This is a tall order for human beings - because we are human beings and not dis-embodied minds untainted by power struggle of conflicted identity seeking reinforcement in validation.

But honesty is our bedrock - for without it insanity runs unchecked. War is the condition in which truth is the first casualty. And so honesty is uncovering the truth of what seems irreconcilably conflicted or un-resolvable.

Joy of appreciation and gratitude for being is a primal contextual diet. Anxiety is toxic if not immediately brought to light and transformed. Fear feeds fear to grow monstrous in the dark. Reason is also Light.

Sun Block?

What you eat and drink can protect your skin from the sun
by Ian Marber

This article considers that diet is a part of the effect of Sun on skin. There is more to skin than surface seems - and more to sunlight too.

I started writing commentary into the issue and this unfolded as my morning meditation:


I write here to look beneath the surface appearance of the issue as it is generally accepted and engaged. No one need give attention to what doesn't resonate with their own interest and so please allow your own desire to  journey in this consideration or not as your willingness and not as struggle. Language does not have to be a war of meanings - but that means receptivity rather than blocking and control - does it not?

I feel their are negative synergies of effect as there are positive - and that denial and demonizing of our nature to promote man-made interferences of manual controls is deeply imprinted in our way of thinking as an expression of what and who we think we are.
The 'modern' myth of more power over nature, more supremacy via 'scientific' extensions of perception, analysis and control is a narrative in which we are blind to anything that reflects and reintegrates to wholeness of being as a balanced expression within Life rather than an attempt to 'lord it' over Life as if apart from and in judgement upon it.

This operates as a very complex masking narrative of mutually agreed definitions that are similar to modern finance in being more and more disconnected from actual wealth lived and shared - and more about managing perceptions amidst the redistribution of guilt as blame - played out as power struggle that masks and filters the feeling and knowing of Life by identifying in mask and model - and conforming or even sacrificing Life to fit the model.

The loss of felt relationship is the condition in which the 'control-mentality' is invoked and accepted as protector - and by the dictate of such a 'guide' is one's nature assigned all the attributes of the 'control-mentality' and Life thus seen as hostile, threatening, treacherous, deceitful, and untrustworthy - and so its 'usurpation' or substitution and replacement with self-limitation in which we can seem to be powerful - and which must be engaged in or the underlying fears and conflicts will surface.

It is not helpful for me to recommend sun exposure as a primary 'Medicine' Way, because context is everything - and there are so many variables - including diets that deplete or deny the synergetic co-factors by which beneficence is felt and known as health. The divide and rule of analytical 'defence' mind is essentially the fight or flight response of denial and evasion relative to a deeper relational conflict that is pushed down or away - and denied awareness by the engagement in diversion of conflict that 'must' be resolved - yet the energetic for this is from the deeper inner conflict and resolving the 'externalized' issues never fully resolves - but seeds and reinforces the problem mentality - as a conditioned sense of seemingly autonomous self.

What I write here may seem to be unrelated to your health relative to Sunlight - but I find any attempt to reveal the negative effects of man-made substitutes as part of re-wakening a presence of unified heart and mind is lost to the conditioned defence which merely flips to gain a sense of identity reinforcement from demonising sun-screen or transfat and low fat high carb processed diet - or much of the pharmaceutical interventions that operate political power in secret - because controlling the narrative is a kind of mind-control. A dictate of conformity and coercive demand that usurps, denies and substitutes for free willingness.

Life without free willing relationship learns nothing but a conditioned obedience and grows or evolves nothing but an illusion of power that hollows and lays waste to our lives and our world - in the guise of progress. One doesn't need to demonize the demonic or 'anti-Life' that such denial operates as - one merely needs recognize what does not belong in you as you truly feel and know yourself to be - and then leave it behind while engaging in what does resonate true. This is living from a different sense of foundation than the 'guide and protector' of the disconnected sense of self.

We are never disconnected from the Life that 'Moves' and communicates Itself through us - but we are now expert at experiencing it so  - and misinterpreting everything through a lens of fear that we are generally unmindful of as it is socially invisible - as long as everyone joins in denying it so as to keep a surface mind split off from such discomfort. Discernment of truth is not definition and control but felt relationship. Without discernment is one's integrity lost to the image and symbol and concept of Life - and all such forms are easily masked by loveless intent that works in reversal - as if to escape relationship for a mental ideal of a static sense of freedom from disturbance.

I predict that sun-screen will be recognized in time to have significant and synergistic negative or toxic consequence as does lack of sunlight. But then the reduction of health, wealth and consciousness of the population at large is allowing a very few to live out fantasies of extraordinary wealth, power and privilege - and so the information will not be 'official' until 40 years after the knowledge is first leaked or discovered.

The body is an extraordinarily complex vehicle - but until the mechanism is understood, 'scientists' wont allow it or will push it in the long grass wile focussing on what reinforces their primary model of a patented or possessed 'understanding or discovery'. This is not Science - but a corruption thereof. However, this is what is being traded as accepted currency - and all the institutions are complicit in their investment in it. Too big to fail? Then it takes down everything and everyone with it. There is no failure in true science - because something is learned or discovered from which to gain a fresh perspective. The application of methods to human 'problems' will fail - because the problems have original cause in false conditioned imprinting - and so the methods need to be guided and used within a relational context.

The 'materialism' that posits cause to be external and the external to be a separate realm of separate things to be exploited and manipulated by a separative consciousness is not what it has presented itself to seem self-evidently to be. You are of and in and as a vibrational energetic expression of Life - or you would not be consciousness of
anything. This is already true regardless the use to which you put your focus of intention and attention. Limitation of consciousness can serve to focus in very specific ways - but at expense of whole field awareness. Pausing from actively focusing and identifying in the dynamic of conflict  which is the principle device for the 'split off attention' we might take as our mind - allows awareness to rise to its own recognition - as a field of being and indeed as a feeling of being. far from being a 'void' - the feeling of being is infinitely rich in information - but to the receptivity of an alignment in relationship. This is going on beneath surface consciousness that may deny it to seem a self in its own power - and if that is the active choice or desire - then it is unwilling for any other experience and will interpret accordingly.

Relationship is often something we fake , mask or pass off as - such that relationships become replaced with forms of ritual behaviours without the felt quality of an intimacy in Life. It is unwise to fake an intimacy or seek to get it by guile - because it will then reflect the lovelessness that such a falsity really presents in place of true presence. But if it burns you - are you now proven justified in your fears and hates? Or have you set a lovelessness in place of an honest capacity to feel your right timing and relational positioning relative to all that is arising to your experience?

And when is such a fragility become worshipful at expense of the power of renewal? So that power can operate in secret to explore and experience fantasies that would be unacceptable in the light of a shared awareness. We find our place relative to our current sense of our needs  - and our need is never at odds or apart from the movement of our being - but mind has made it seem so - and so it is the mind that is to be observed and recognized true or false - from a perspective prior to its framing of conception and perception. Or else all things are rendered  unrecognisable - and given all sorts of kaleidoscope meanings - real and imagined - but equally accepted true.

What if we are the 'bad guys'?

What If We Are The ‘Bad Guys?’
Irwin Ozborne, Contributor
Waking Times

The above article is specific to the USA and by extension to its allies - but my comment is applicable to the core patterning of identity that is implicitly conveyed in the header.

- - -

Look at the identities you accept - or project to others as part of your own.
Framing identity in terms of good and bad is a 'war on Self' for what and who you are is not decided or determined by your narrative of identification - but of course this is who you have come to believe yourself to be as a result of denying what you hate or fear within yourself and of defending and asserting what you present as if it is the whole or true of you.

A unipolar identity is not really open to relationship because it is only open to what agrees with it or extends what it already believes.

The globalism of a unipolar consciousness operates not only denial of the freewilling life of others - but its own - because it is locked into 'my way or no way' in the power struggle to come out on top. There is never a time when acquired or asserted power is enough - because any imaginable scenario of threat magnifies out of any possible disagreement or difference. Any communication is 'interpreted as power play'. Communication becomes impossible.

The insanity of this identification has to be recognized in order to be released in our own mind. It takes one to know one and power-envy along with vengeance is pervasive in the hatred of feeling powerless under others - but power itself is rarely self-revealing in its own terms, seeking to hide within presentations and narratives of acceptability and justification - indeed in self righteousness. This is not a mind-set of whoever happens to be embodying it. It is a pervasive mentality that operates as the core self belief and identity of the human condition-ing thus far un-healed.

A multi polar identity fundamentally accepts reality as a living communication in which identity arises as a gift of a shared purpose - for the dance within and between the polarities has a balance point in which one is true to oneself and through which can be truly in relation rather than seeking to resolve or work out internal contradictions in external terms.

The 'good cop/bad cop' device is the terrorizing influence of rage, hate and lovelessness, switching to a presentation of kindness and sympathy by which to 'escape' or hold at bay the now hidden terror - which is embedded in such a pact to be called on if overstepping fear's dictate.

The experience of lovelessness in rage and hate is indeed hateful and greatly disturbing - so much that we do our utmost to eradicate, escape and excommunicate it from ourself in the fear and hatred and distrust of the Other... and we become ourselves a loveless, hateful agency of what we deny on surface - excepting when 'justifiably provoked'.

The true Nature of Consciousness is reap and sow - or indeed give and receive. What you put in is what you get out. In giving hate or lovelessness of indifference to the experience of unrecognized parts of our Self, we set up a comeback in which we do not recognize our part in. I am not saying we are now to blame for the evils of the world including our own sense of being violated - but that it is within the range of our innate capacity to recognize denied self within experiences that seem to deny us - and in the moment of recognition is a shift of perspective that has been called grace.

I cannot change you or even persuade you of anything you are not already in the willingness to recognize as your own. I never have been able to exert power over you. But the complex play of fragmented and denied or split identity, sets up a disempowering belief in which others then seem more powerful as a result of a loss of power. Humanity has played this game to its conclusion - which is complete loss of power to the illusion of power. To the identifiction of power over Life or Existence.

Now is a choice. Identifictions within meaningless struggle for a power that can never truly fulfil, or the embracing of Life - regardless the messy involvement of denial coming up into awareness as every kind of hated or feared or despised (judged against) aspects.

Instead of branding 'evil' and living from self-justified hate - pause the judgement and listen or feel within for the Movement of your being - and you recognize the embrace of that which you can wholly embrace as having a core peace to it - which the desperate attempt to validate or enforce a partial sense over the whole or as the whole can never have - regardless the form it takes.

Through your willingness, discern the willingness of others and grow in the trust of your own feeling being - so as to be feeling and thinking, receptive and embodying, as a balancing of a wholeness that you already are but have not allowed to embody through you - while you think you alone (in whatever aspect is currently active) are in charge.

The need for enemy is the need for evil - over and against which to make an identity at odds with a wholeness. I am not saying there is not an evil arising from the denial and refusal of Life - but that its capacity to insinuate itself in your own thinking is deep set - and so you cannot trust your own thinking without pausing a moment or however long it takes - to feel the nature of where you are coming from and know that it is truly your heart's acceptance and your mind's purpose - as one.

Making mistakes is not failure, guilt, sin and shame, but is feedback without which you would be unable to grow. Growing in the embrace of Life is natural to the release of hate - and self-hate is the deepest and most divisive. That is why evil intent nurtures and leverages or triggers this in you at every opportunity so as to get you to think you are one of the good guys, while running its agenda through your split mind.

You are not one of the bad guys within any true recognition of Self no matter what roles have been enacted, but only the recognition brings that knowing. The forms of words can and are used to deceive - and so regardless of the words I have accepted for this communication - feel for your own discernment of what opens resonance and relevance to who you feel yourself to be at this timing of relationship and live from owning and knowing yourself integrally rather than as a 'power struggle' of authorities and contradictions.

It was not wrong to seek to make a unity of chaos - but now it is not wrong to listen to and abide in the chaos for insight and communication that was lost in the act of trying to conform it to limited ideas of what we - or anything - should be. There is a ripening for a fresh perspective. Revelation from what we have long judged against - because we are willing to listen with fresh curiosity. Indeed such is our need.

The Big Science Con

Individuals, Not Governments, Drive Scientific Progress
By Daily Bell Staff

My comment into this theme:

As framed in human experience, we seem to be explorers and discoverers - struggling against not only adversities of the 'human condition' but the ignorances and arrogances of human conditioning.

 The covering over or 'forgetting' of Knowing - operates another 'identity' than that which is innate to our Individuality of Life Expression - and undercurrent to its masked persona or role in presentation is a running away or avoidance of the core separation trauma or conditioning that has imprinted and set up the patterns of relationship that are all forms of power struggle within a pervasive threat that allure as the desire to take the power position that is absented by the loss of Knowing - which is full feeling presence and not a 'divide and rule' fragmented assertion or imposition against free-willing.

 Individual free willing has been subverted by the redefining of will as power -over rather than as alignment-within the power of love - recognized and recognisable as a wholeness and balanced quality of spirit, feeling, mind and body.

 Everything has thus been subverted and redefined from its original native language of recognition to 'currencies' of dissociation that operate a primary role in maintaining the block on such true communication so that power-struggle can persist as the only 'power on Earth' and the determining guide and protector to our life on Earth.

 The process of Re-wakening or Re-membering from and as a deeper recognition of Felt Being rather than 'assertion of an emotion-backed thinking' and struggling among its reflections, is of releasing a particular form of fear-based control that blinds - or operates as the darkness or lack of Knowing - as attempt to fill a LACK of presence with an imposed narrative identity.

 Conflict that feeds upon itself becomes paralysis - masking as 'order' of limitation in which 'control' seems to hold perceived or believed 'chaos' at bay. Balance of inner communication is a required foundation for re-opening an expanded participation of energetic relationship beyond the 'gravitic' model that 'separates' the 'Living Universe' by reducing a communication of Totality to a teeny force acting at a distance between remote bodies.

 Yet no instant or experience of anything or anyone but is of the Whole - regardless the frameworks of meaning that can be applied as filters and distortions to meet the demand of the 'mind' currently accepted and projected as your own.

 Living Communication is of an energetic nature that will never altogether fit or conform to any model or definition - BUT our models and definitions can be aligned with our true willing so as to be guided and supported in that energetic - and embody it.

 Without more alignment - opening the 'Doors of Perception' is opening a destructive reversal to the possibility of a truly embodied Humanity - of which only tiny glimpses have thus far leaked into 'Plato's Cave'. For no 'man-minded substitute for Knowing can abide in the presence of the Source of all Thought, Feeling and Form. False currency is revealed.

 Yet the veils ARE lifting or disintegrating - regardless the concerted focussing in collective 'identity' and so as see it, we are obliged - as in a crash-course of necessity - to find and live such alignment. Not because an unloving edict demands it - but because the persistence of an unloving edit costs so much in terms of the pain of life denied. And the true desire uncovered is for life in Life's terms and not on what I previously identified and defended as 'me'.

 The underlying pattern of consciousness is itself the censoring, limiting and controlling power - that has all the power we give it by operating blindly as its embodiment - in all its various roles. One key role of which is of hatred and opposition - for this is where we get a sense of 'power' from in place of being perfectly identified in a true relational willingness - which is not given or accepted by rote or as programmed - but is a truly felt and acted event. It is reclaiming your life back from alignment with a false sense of power.

 Growing the communications of a true resonance in Life is different than feeding off the seemingly self-righteous forms of power that persist in ancient patterns of role-play. It is not waiting for Life to come and validate its new world order - in fact it is not identifying primarily in the forms of its expression at all - but as the underlying communication of Idea that is Alive - and re-Minding us by operating through us and reflecting to us - each within the Whole and therefore within each other.

 The scientific expansion of perspective that HAS been revealed has not yet been accepted in its Consciousness implications and obligations - because the core imprinting of limitation via division and control is not itself recognized - in act. This is an individual responsibility that no amount of 'teaching theory' or associating in 'identity' woven of such theory can substitute for. Yet the mind in 'rehearsal' does substitute for Life - as if to bring safety while seeming to work towards resolving or regaining lost power.

 False currency is a key phrase I use here on Daily Bell - for in an extroverted form - you are aware of the device by which to own the system by which all else has been brought to depend on. Expansion of Consciousness is the recognition within Mind of perspectives that were already present but effectively hidden or denied by one's current sense of self-definition.

 All definitions bring consequences or fruits of identity-experience. But only those that align with who you truly know and feel yourself to be - are belonging in you. If you persist in attempting to become who you are not - you will succeed in forgetting who you are. This is a moment by moment responsibility. You cannot 'go to mind' and get a formula for how to live your life. You are an individual at root regardless the fragmentations that are reflecting as experience - but this is a fruit to be savoured and appropriately shared, not a mind-identity to sacrifice true presence of Life to - so as to 'replace it'.

 My comment here responds to the energetic that the article communicates within me - not merely the forms. In an 'Electric Universe', Everything is Communication - bar none. But the act of definition operates some quality of differentiation and limitation within the Idea of focusing in true desire.

 To be the 'puzzle piece' that I truly am is to meet the alignments of Life regardless that others have their own freely unfolding experience. This is my individuality - for no role is invalidated - just because it is not my current choice. We do not gain power by invalidating the power of others - we lose it. But power here means something different to what it is currently colluded in meaning.

 Redeeming meaning from false or falsely framed meanings is a true accounting. It is only by a false accounting that pain and destruction can be outsourced to 'others' while playing out an elitist or exclusive and Life-rejecting 'individualism'.

 The idea of a 'need to know' uncovering its desire fulfilled is also the need or desire to be who you are - regardless of any obstructions, persecutions or limitations encountered. Indeed these are part of the unfolding and not really as the sense of lack defines them, but this has to be realised to be true. It cant just be asserted true as if to gain a superior commentary position within the identity in lack.

 We (each) - and on that basis - together have to find ways to use apparent obstruction or adversity so as to restore and reintegrate to living purpose rather than fragment into polarized reactivity. Unless that is in fact the purpose that is accepted as your living will.

 We are conditioned to seek greater force of leverage - but I invite a greater perspective upon our active definitions. Imagination is freedom - and in freedom to imagine other perspectives is an arbitrary set of mind replaced without war - although the symptoms of an old pattern may persist while the core of new insight grows within.

 Emotionality is not free feeling - and in a sense is the fear of intimacy or full feeling. The 'resistance' to looking within is generally held in place by emotionally backed conditioning. But to exclusively 'look out' - without true insight is a state of dissociation and denial - regardless how 'normal' its consensual camouflage.




     dsaulw made this comment to the main article:

     Not only will government-sponsored science not produce anything innovative to speak of, it will do its best to destroy anyone who is trying to advance science that runs counter to the party line. Just think about what it has done to global warming dissidents, and to those who have come up with treatments for cancer outside of the sanctioned box.

  

 My response to dsaulw:


     I feel you would be better saying 'corporate-governance'. The corporate sector long ago 'captured' and subverted most of any power in government from behind the scenes. So called 'trade deals' like TPIP are only seeking to 'legalize' this openly.

     If there were somehow 'free trade' restored to idea exploration and development then would we all not simply recreate the same hierarchical power struggle because our relation to idea is exploitative rather than truly creative?

     As for science - its foundations define its limits and although the model can be tweaked around the edges and minutiae of details filled in - they will all be conformed and interpreted through the core foundational intent - and so the dots are joined up to 'validate' what the core intention is set to - regardless the forms it takes.

     'Trojan horse' is an idea of hiding agenda in a seemingly sacred or benign and auspicious or acceptable and respectable form. Once you have 'swallowed the bait' your identity is compromised - or replaced - with something not unlike a cuckoo's egg, where the emergent chick sucks your resources and protections while destroying your true offspring. Not unlike the forms of many cancers

     The reversal or undoing of deceit operates from a true foundation rather than becoming baited into conflict. The growing or rising of wholeness and health within the body politic is through the witnessing of its living qualities regardless appearances and assertions to the contrary.

     You (anyone) may observe the patterns you ascribe to 'government' in your own mind so readily as to be almost stating the self-evident - that has somehow been rendered invisible by a 'collectivist' hatred of oppositional or rival power that is demonized when inconvenient to the furthering or masking of one's own.

     Innovations as such, may have far reaching consequences that may be much harder (or impossible) to put back in their box than release - such as genetic engineering or AI in their ability to replace humanity and the environment with hacked versions carrying agenda that even their proponents may be ignorant of.

     The idea of progress is according to What and Who and Why. A lust for power over Life that does not know the root of its own drive to possess it - has a different notion of progress than the desire to embracing Life.

     "Ironically, ever since we “scientized” nutrition, the state of our health has declined. Decisions about what to eat and drink have gone from habits of culture and heritage to calculated choices based on shortsighted nutritional theories, with little consideration of how human beings reached modernity in the first place." (~ Pearlmutter: Grain Brain)

     'Scientizing' is weaponizing or marketising - in short it is operating a command and control power agenda under the guise of 'serving humanity', 'progress', evolution and of course to make a 'better world' or even a new world order - but for who exactly? The anti-Nature element in science has an arrogant undertone of deep seated rage and distrust - as if "Never Again!" to suffer such hurt or loss as has become collectively associated with what such distrust frames as our 'original' or given nature.

     Seeking to make 'sense' of experience arises when we know not what we do - and don't recognize ourselves in Creation - and so mind that operated as if disconnected calls upon itself to justify itself in denial of its own reflection.

     The 'meanings' given cancer and used as currency by society are almost all those of the rogue cell or the symptom as the disease to be warred upon, eradicated or managed because it cant be trusted not to flare up and kill you. This is not a biological practicality so much as the original imprinting from which we have not evolved regardless clothing it in technological sophistry. However - on a biological level:

     http://www.westonaprice.org/modern-diseases/cancer-to-the-rescue/

     Seneff offers a welcome shift of perspective that does not automatically assign or dump guilt and causality on the body as a 'rogue agent' but recognizes relationship with environmental nutrients and toxicities as the point at which accepted but false 'truths' have undermined a natural discerning OF mind by the confusion of identifying within such thinking.

     This thinking is so deeply embedded and emotionally charged so as to make a cancer diagnosis a 'voodoo' that can trigger a deeper guilt and powerlessness of Life that often collapses to accept any directions of 'help' that are generally emphatically asserted as an immediate step without pause to question or challenge any of the information and what it actually means.

     The 'sin' - and punishment - is then projected to anyone who 'deprives' or misleads with 'false' hope in place of 'official treatment' that is more often than not more destructive than the disease.