The real unacceptable faces of capitalism
By: Merryn Somerset Webb at moneyweek
My comment to the above:
Why give focus to the personae when the underlying ills are a logical result of laws passed and accepted. Laws by which corporations are given 'personal' rights without corresponding responsibilities. Laws by which private banks come to own and effectively control any flavour or face of political 'power'. Laws by which corporations are compelled to asset strip and 'outsource' pain, misery and degradation of our experience of Life on Earth - excepting themselves as the privileged elect and believing themselves superior and powerful enough to disregard the lives of others - and anyway "it's always been this way and there's nothing you can really do about it except make sure your own interests are 'protected'".
What law is for society, accepted beliefs and definitions are for the individual - and work as a template of persona and world-view from which to operate. When confusions of obvious insanity rise to a surface awareness there is a call to look beneath surface appearances and identify what does not belong in the template of our focusing - or indeed of our devotions. Sweeping out the 'moneylender from the Template' is not primarily a political activism but a matter of individual housekeeping. And from a true foundation, we can bring a true witness to our collective housekeeping - for at its most basic level, that is what our political society embodies; how do we arrange or organize our selves and our lives in a human experience that has much in common whilst embodying a great diversity?
The 'win-lose' mindset operates differently from the 'win-win' willingness. This segregative or integrative polarisation marks the difference regardless of the face or form of the system, political or otherwise. If beneath appearances and shows of 'Power', is only a fear of loss - then where is the power to live and love, grow and learn, discover and appreciate?
Investing our lives in a fear of loss driven system is seeking power and protection in terms defined by fearful and self-invalidating conditioning. False investment doesn't only increase indebtedness and indenture to the false - but costs the recognition, appreciation and gratitude for the true - for what truly embodies and fulfils the desire of living that goes forth to multiply or magnify a true sense of worth and wealth - and whose cup flows over as a matter of course. Misery is miser-y. Breaking siege is letting fresh perspective into a painted corner from which no escape is conceivable.
Worth and wealth have to find a timing and a way to embody - regardless the 'siege mentality' - because the world we meet will reflect where we are coming from. I don't suggest this can be manipulatively exploited - but that one doesn't grow a new habit by framing it in the old habit.
Showing posts with label cultural renewal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cultural renewal. Show all posts
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
Tuesday, 10 February 2015
Beeing Well
Stressed young bees could be cause of colony declines,
I see some sane commenting below. Gratitude.
Bees symbolize joining in common or shared value in service of a wholeness of ... beeing.
Beeing is our nature our first cause from which our thinking and speaking and action proceed.
Stresses of all kinds are resulting from attempting to bee out of sync with our nature - so much so as to usurp it with fear conditioned slave mentality that is ruled by the 1% Beeing 99% blind - who are parasitically compromised by un-owned fear to 'lord it' over Life, even as the 99% are paralysed by unowned fear to demand unconsciousness and resist change.
There are many levels and kind of attack upon our healthy beeing - a broad spectrum collapse in which anything we do tends to feed the problem with yet more ways to kill us.
So yes, there are bio hazards that big money pushes into atmosphere, agriculture, a range of pharmaceuticals, chemicals and materials in common use environmentally, poisons in food supply, and of course More! These are supported by corruptions in corporate, scientific, financial, political, Media and civil endeavour.
Divide and rule operates to use up or open up residual resource to exploitation that essentially turns wealth into an evaporation that fuels the drive to get more and have less.
Beeing is simply shared. Me-ing seeks to possess and control - thus warring against Life and becoming stuck in a toxic investment. Struggles to manage perception take over from addressing issues. Anger, fear and powerlessness erupt in personal focus of blame and bury the issues in incitement to conflict. The death wish of a separate 'me' comes home to roost - because it was our starting point and only clever accounting makes a loss seem like a gain and a promise seem like a carrot in the bank and a stick to protect - but you cannot HAVE what you cannot BE and the stick beats the shit out of anyone who breaks ranks on self-delusion.
I invite gloom and doomers to eat their words and see if in fact they truly belong in circulation. Metamorphosis is in process. Choose the word and thought you live and give currency to - consciously - because the wind is changing and whatever face you are wearing becomes your choice.
The capacity and spontaneity of the Movement of health and renewal is limited by our belief - because we interpret everything to a fearfully self-defined agenda that is founded on belief. One doesn't have to believe anything that does not resonate true for that one - but we are obliged to release our compulsive fixation to assert and defend unrecognized belief that is presumed 'reality'. Scepticism is open to ALL evidence or it is merely cynicism in mask. Bee a gatherer of true flowering - but joyfully - passionately - from a wholeness of belonging. But the only way of letting or allowing such a life is to bee yourself - let the presence of life bee you - and know it true.
It is not gone when we are to busy being agitated to look see.
Bees symbolize joining in common or shared value in service of a wholeness of ... beeing.
Beeing is our nature our first cause from which our thinking and speaking and action proceed.
Stresses of all kinds are resulting from attempting to bee out of sync with our nature - so much so as to usurp it with fear conditioned slave mentality that is ruled by the 1% Beeing 99% blind - who are parasitically compromised by un-owned fear to 'lord it' over Life, even as the 99% are paralysed by unowned fear to demand unconsciousness and resist change.
There are many levels and kind of attack upon our healthy beeing - a broad spectrum collapse in which anything we do tends to feed the problem with yet more ways to kill us.
So yes, there are bio hazards that big money pushes into atmosphere, agriculture, a range of pharmaceuticals, chemicals and materials in common use environmentally, poisons in food supply, and of course More! These are supported by corruptions in corporate, scientific, financial, political, Media and civil endeavour.
Divide and rule operates to use up or open up residual resource to exploitation that essentially turns wealth into an evaporation that fuels the drive to get more and have less.
Beeing is simply shared. Me-ing seeks to possess and control - thus warring against Life and becoming stuck in a toxic investment. Struggles to manage perception take over from addressing issues. Anger, fear and powerlessness erupt in personal focus of blame and bury the issues in incitement to conflict. The death wish of a separate 'me' comes home to roost - because it was our starting point and only clever accounting makes a loss seem like a gain and a promise seem like a carrot in the bank and a stick to protect - but you cannot HAVE what you cannot BE and the stick beats the shit out of anyone who breaks ranks on self-delusion.
I invite gloom and doomers to eat their words and see if in fact they truly belong in circulation. Metamorphosis is in process. Choose the word and thought you live and give currency to - consciously - because the wind is changing and whatever face you are wearing becomes your choice.
The capacity and spontaneity of the Movement of health and renewal is limited by our belief - because we interpret everything to a fearfully self-defined agenda that is founded on belief. One doesn't have to believe anything that does not resonate true for that one - but we are obliged to release our compulsive fixation to assert and defend unrecognized belief that is presumed 'reality'. Scepticism is open to ALL evidence or it is merely cynicism in mask. Bee a gatherer of true flowering - but joyfully - passionately - from a wholeness of belonging. But the only way of letting or allowing such a life is to bee yourself - let the presence of life bee you - and know it true.
It is not gone when we are to busy being agitated to look see.
Thursday, 20 November 2014
Globalism - What good is it?
Globalism - What good is it?
Coercive power divides to consolidate and so there is an inevitable 'globalism' when technologies dissolve the limitations that localized coercive power and held it in check as part of a greater communication.
The opportunity that a coercive mentality 'sees' in expanding and opening global markets and in emergent technological usurping of established relationships and services all automatically operates as a negative agenda of the consolidation of coercive power in ever fewer hands. Within such agenda is the parental role of the those in the establishment who assume the right and duty to rule those who demonstrate an incapacity to self-governance. There is a role for parental oversight and guidance but insofar as it operates a coercive identity it serves a divisive and segregating agenda.
Trade and war have been vehicles of cultural communication despite often being rapacious, and genocidal. Trade operates a communication and exchange of needs and values and as such is like unto healthy cell function in the body. But cartel and racket of identity in power operates to make induce abundances and scarcities in such a way as to deprive the cell of its connection to the whole and thus function within an artificially induced isolated individualism. This replicates the programming of the mentality of scarcity and disconnection through out the body so as to reconfigure it much as a parasite reconfigures the neural and immunological networks of its host to serve the usurping agenda.
True power is not coercively asserted upon relations nor coercively maintained to prevent true relations being restored. It is properly a quality and capacity of communication that aligns true fulfilment.
A mind at war within itself may struggle to integrate one aspect over another or multiple aspects within one - but it is never truly unifying or unifiable - for it ONLY unites in alliance to separate never to release the mind of war by which all such separation seems real.
But just as the body will heal if not prevented or disabled from doing so - so is there a reintegrating movement to our Consciousness that - beneath the overlay of war IS Unified Indivisible and Pure EXPERIENCE itself. And not a separate god thinking a separate world to lord it over in jealousy of any other power.
The opportunity for the willingness for reintegration is diametrically opposite to that of the need to GET for itself alone. It also operates automatically as an integrative and healing perspective - but being integrative is not at war with itself nor coercive upon itself in order to be all that it is as a communication within the mind that thinks itself many and at war.
The ideas that are manifesting are those that are accepted true and given identity and belief. This is always so. A Global identity can mean a global imposition of coercively dictated identification and it can mean an awakening humanity to its true nature in the shaking off of a parasitic kind of thinking that does NOT belong and has no place in us.
The nature of a truly free will indicates we wake up in the world we choose to be in. And the nature of a hidden agenda is to operate subconsciously within appearances for private gain. Everything we think and say and do is part of choosing the world we want to be experiencing. Using relationships to assert private fantasy upon may be within one's freedom to accept, but it will not one's freedom reflect.
Just because human beings agree to make fantasy currency, does not establish that it connects to true value. Forgery is a mind-game long before the idea 'money'. But when the whole market is full of manipulators, be sure no one will blow the whistle - and such as do, will be ignored - or rather filtered out or distorted by the lens of a fearfully driven identity.
Response #1 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)
It does not work to project your current consciousness into other consciousness cultures. The tribe IS the family and ones self and meaning and fulfilment were felt, known and shared AS family.
The devolving of humanity has been operational for a long time now and the psyche operating such dissociation from true belonging does indeed evolve ever more complex rationalisations to support itself and deny its true condition - that is its original nature and the true condition of its split and conflicted nature. It does so by projecting upon a world in order to dis-own itself and excommunicate what it elects to hate and differentiate from what it cannot control - which leaves it a private mind associated in a body and with others of like kind. But they are not really out there and external - nor the hated self, they are feeling knowing ones as are you - and so you are family but are blind to each other by virtue of your highly evolved superiority over Life.
That was just from your first statement - Manly Hall's youtube on American Indian culture might be worth a listen.
Uncovering true governance in oneself will extend as right relations with others and grow or reinforce integrative and shared values that support structures in which all can live. The focus on the form is a deceptive denial of the meaning. the meaning is not derived from the form - but the form embodies the meaning - OR deceit is active.
If falling onto our own resources without the protections and prohibitions of the State will activate us to do more than think about things ;-)
In emergence of what is truly needs one soon recognizes what not only does not work but cannot be afforded. If fear mounts on fear - stark insanity breaks out from within - and then manifests without.
One way or another I feel fear - the choice that is fear - is being exposed AS a choice and each will then exercise choice in consciousness of free willingness as to whether they want to repeat another grand cycle - from the dark, or accept the shift to a new paradigm in which fear is no longer hidden or hide-able - and responsibility for consciousness AS conciousness replaces the mask of the persona and its game of powers.
The script will run whatever, but the perspective we choose determines our identification.
The attempt to change the world out from an un-owned fearful projection upon the world is an insanity and a futility.
History is not a dustbin. Everything passes. But its trace and connection to and from our current perspective is also a cultural choice or indeed a fear directed manipulation.
It is possible for the choice to deny choice to retrograde consciousness into very dense contraction and disconnection for light. But just because something is possible does not mean we resonate with it or find it in any sense a meaningful choice. But you know that pain can call intensely for darkness - in delusion that hiding is escape. Exposure of the meaninglessness in light witnesses evaporation. Fear does not know who you are - how can it protect you but in persisting to knot know or be known truly. Without its government all will be chaos! it screams. Let it scream. No one HAS to answer that phone call.
Response #2 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)
What is to smash - an idea? I believe the vocabulary of the cult you seek to point out uses terms like smash.
If you find the established or old paradigm operates a model that costs so much more complexity of confusion, conflict and fear to maintain and support, than it offers in true service to life, then grow the new one.
In a nutshell, the state is an idea that manifests an institution that acquires a sense of its own existence or ego-centric distortion. The guardian becomes a guard, the protector a jailer, the communication device a block to communication.
The only ideas that will manifest are those that find acceptance and allegiance of recognition and value.
A coercive sense of self-existence seeks to determine these ideas to support its own private agendas - be they personal or corporately operating.
Thus communication itself has been usurped by war to convince, trick or persuade others what the perpetrator WANTS to be accepted true by others - for whatever reasons consciously held or unconsciously active.
A new paradigm is what is being recognized and shared and embodied as true value - rather than reactive or negatively defined reactions to an unwanted value.
Much as the warriors of grievance and frustration refuse to accept - this has to begin within oneself. Not as a thinking exercise of shifting the furniture around, but in the manner of a breakdown/breakthrough that is cooperatively embraced or perhaps passes through periods of deep unsettling - because it is our reality that is 'broken' - not the truth of whatever it is that we truly are - but our beliefs, thoughts and concepts that define our self - and therefore operate a model by which we see and share the world.
The state or cult that I seek to identify as the template that needs renewal and alignment is the cult of the identity of a command and control mentality. A fearful and fear inducing coercive and deceptive mentality. It can be seen as pervasive to every area of our life - because it is a false foundation.
The idea of coercing the coercion out of existence is simply a play within persistence. There is no way of fighting it to win because it is the very idea of fighting for something and will be fed by whatever side of whatever fight. Standing in one's integrity may look like fighting - but the key is being positively integrative. Siding with our inherent integrity and freedom is siding with all but refusing the bait of that which disintegrates and tyrannizes.
It is no surprise that 'the shadow power' owns the resistance as well as the state. it basically owns anything that becomes significant to its agenda - enough to make sure its interests are served in ways that keep it in shadow.
The mask can seem appealing or threatening but underneath is nothing anyone would choose, who had any capacity to choose. So the mask is also that which effectively denies the awareness of the capacity to freely choose. Another name for mask is persona. The netbot and spambot idea offers a sense of millions of infected PCs being wielded by shadow power. I propose that the antivirus software in our mind is in fact operating as a back door for shadow power to operate remotely and configure our own minds for its agenda. I am talking of 'fear'.
As long as individuals choose to propagate and support a cult of fear, true cultural renewal and expression will be undermined. The desire to 'make the really bad feelings go away' calls on any and every kind of deceit - including giving power to the State or to experts or rationalism or religion of any kind of ideology whatsoever.
Notice now that the institutions or ideas that WERE operative in keeping fear hidden or keeping us hidden in fear are breaking down. That is the end of the old paradigm - there is no persisting in it except perhaps an adventure in an even deeper descent into fear than we have yet imagined - and I say we are deeply down that rabbit hole already - as far as our identity of conditioned mind is concerned.
Fear is a mixture of self-conflicting elements that have no basis in truth - but only in reactive interplay in which an enemy is essential for maintaining such identity - what identity? Command and control. The wish for power. Pluck out the sin of our own mind and then see your world, your fellow man and the choices he makes and suffers as if done unto him.
All warriors of the grievance unite in denying the man of peace - because they cannot find support from him or a way to subvert or co-opt his will - simply because it is not in conflict with itself.
It is not true that Jesus was special or that the story of Jesus is serving a specialness that was irrelevant to any other human being with a willingness to listen. Fear has made a mask over it so as to neutralize its meaning - which is simply the meaning of putting aside the will to power - the persona-investment - and uncovering a will that is unconflicted.
the 'second coming' is the recognition of the meaning of our true will beneath the coercive deceptions of a hidden fear which we took as our own thinking.
True relations embody the culture of a tangibly shared sense of value. Just embody nothing ELSE and you will BE the new paradigm and an unselfconscious ambassador for a joy and integrity of being.
Or persist as a warrior of the grievance, a seeker of vengeance, a captain of the self-righteous or as Pink Floyd once put it; "a lead role in a cage". No one can put you there but you - and whatever else Mandela lived he demonstrated the mind is what imprisons - regardless the outer cage. But who wants freedom who already believes their freedom is reactive and oppositional identity?
Response #2A
Yes what works is what persists - according to the purpose held. When the model breaks down it may attempt more and more extreme attempts to control - yet adding control is what introduces instability into a system - at least in the sense I mean of coercive control. There are innate ways of control that are not fearful intervention but harmonic resonance. One can inspire a concerted effort. But attempting to manipulate a result by faking inspirations is like crying wolf. It soon uses up residual credibility.
I feel perhaps to qualify that Mind Is Free but that 'my mind' is a layer that imposes limitations and constraints - within mutually agreed and reinforced beliefs and definitions.
I find that realignment to true relations, operates a clarification in which what is completely false falls away and what was a confusion of true within false framing is restored to its true status.
If we look at our language, we can immediately see how we give power away.
Whatever else I do when I write or speak or think, I am vigilant for distortions. One starts wherever one is at - but there are ways we use our mind to make it seem limited and then believe our own spin.
Worth remembering that words (idea, definition, belief) SPELL and that our word operates whether we know what we are doing or not.
I'm not advocating political correctness - simply owning what we put out and being willing to stand in it or meet through it. So much that passes off is exactly that - passing off or masking.
If there is a new paradigm arising as the need of our time then it will be through a willingness to live it - in whatever way is our discovered way.
I'm more interested in the integrity of people in relations of shared interest than exactly what structures serve at any given moment. When communication is engaged - which ONLY occurs in freedom everything starts to synchronize and open up. So I feel to point to the blocks to freedom where they CAN be released - which is not really out there though we might use that to invalidate ourselves and not step up to the mark where the next step is waiting to lead us in unexpected directions.
I believe the world we manifest and perceive is directly reflective of the consciousness within of which we are mostly oblivious. But those who 'direct history' know well that ideas and beliefs structure and direct and organise perception and identity. But they are messing from the outside whereas within our mind we really do have a true power of command that is not coercive and divisive but whole.
Coercive power divides to consolidate and so there is an inevitable 'globalism' when technologies dissolve the limitations that localized coercive power and held it in check as part of a greater communication.
The opportunity that a coercive mentality 'sees' in expanding and opening global markets and in emergent technological usurping of established relationships and services all automatically operates as a negative agenda of the consolidation of coercive power in ever fewer hands. Within such agenda is the parental role of the those in the establishment who assume the right and duty to rule those who demonstrate an incapacity to self-governance. There is a role for parental oversight and guidance but insofar as it operates a coercive identity it serves a divisive and segregating agenda.
Trade and war have been vehicles of cultural communication despite often being rapacious, and genocidal. Trade operates a communication and exchange of needs and values and as such is like unto healthy cell function in the body. But cartel and racket of identity in power operates to make induce abundances and scarcities in such a way as to deprive the cell of its connection to the whole and thus function within an artificially induced isolated individualism. This replicates the programming of the mentality of scarcity and disconnection through out the body so as to reconfigure it much as a parasite reconfigures the neural and immunological networks of its host to serve the usurping agenda.
True power is not coercively asserted upon relations nor coercively maintained to prevent true relations being restored. It is properly a quality and capacity of communication that aligns true fulfilment.
A mind at war within itself may struggle to integrate one aspect over another or multiple aspects within one - but it is never truly unifying or unifiable - for it ONLY unites in alliance to separate never to release the mind of war by which all such separation seems real.
But just as the body will heal if not prevented or disabled from doing so - so is there a reintegrating movement to our Consciousness that - beneath the overlay of war IS Unified Indivisible and Pure EXPERIENCE itself. And not a separate god thinking a separate world to lord it over in jealousy of any other power.
The opportunity for the willingness for reintegration is diametrically opposite to that of the need to GET for itself alone. It also operates automatically as an integrative and healing perspective - but being integrative is not at war with itself nor coercive upon itself in order to be all that it is as a communication within the mind that thinks itself many and at war.
The ideas that are manifesting are those that are accepted true and given identity and belief. This is always so. A Global identity can mean a global imposition of coercively dictated identification and it can mean an awakening humanity to its true nature in the shaking off of a parasitic kind of thinking that does NOT belong and has no place in us.
The nature of a truly free will indicates we wake up in the world we choose to be in. And the nature of a hidden agenda is to operate subconsciously within appearances for private gain. Everything we think and say and do is part of choosing the world we want to be experiencing. Using relationships to assert private fantasy upon may be within one's freedom to accept, but it will not one's freedom reflect.
Just because human beings agree to make fantasy currency, does not establish that it connects to true value. Forgery is a mind-game long before the idea 'money'. But when the whole market is full of manipulators, be sure no one will blow the whistle - and such as do, will be ignored - or rather filtered out or distorted by the lens of a fearfully driven identity.
Response #1 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)
It does not work to project your current consciousness into other consciousness cultures. The tribe IS the family and ones self and meaning and fulfilment were felt, known and shared AS family.
The devolving of humanity has been operational for a long time now and the psyche operating such dissociation from true belonging does indeed evolve ever more complex rationalisations to support itself and deny its true condition - that is its original nature and the true condition of its split and conflicted nature. It does so by projecting upon a world in order to dis-own itself and excommunicate what it elects to hate and differentiate from what it cannot control - which leaves it a private mind associated in a body and with others of like kind. But they are not really out there and external - nor the hated self, they are feeling knowing ones as are you - and so you are family but are blind to each other by virtue of your highly evolved superiority over Life.
That was just from your first statement - Manly Hall's youtube on American Indian culture might be worth a listen.
Uncovering true governance in oneself will extend as right relations with others and grow or reinforce integrative and shared values that support structures in which all can live. The focus on the form is a deceptive denial of the meaning. the meaning is not derived from the form - but the form embodies the meaning - OR deceit is active.
If falling onto our own resources without the protections and prohibitions of the State will activate us to do more than think about things ;-)
In emergence of what is truly needs one soon recognizes what not only does not work but cannot be afforded. If fear mounts on fear - stark insanity breaks out from within - and then manifests without.
One way or another I feel fear - the choice that is fear - is being exposed AS a choice and each will then exercise choice in consciousness of free willingness as to whether they want to repeat another grand cycle - from the dark, or accept the shift to a new paradigm in which fear is no longer hidden or hide-able - and responsibility for consciousness AS conciousness replaces the mask of the persona and its game of powers.
The script will run whatever, but the perspective we choose determines our identification.
The attempt to change the world out from an un-owned fearful projection upon the world is an insanity and a futility.
History is not a dustbin. Everything passes. But its trace and connection to and from our current perspective is also a cultural choice or indeed a fear directed manipulation.
It is possible for the choice to deny choice to retrograde consciousness into very dense contraction and disconnection for light. But just because something is possible does not mean we resonate with it or find it in any sense a meaningful choice. But you know that pain can call intensely for darkness - in delusion that hiding is escape. Exposure of the meaninglessness in light witnesses evaporation. Fear does not know who you are - how can it protect you but in persisting to knot know or be known truly. Without its government all will be chaos! it screams. Let it scream. No one HAS to answer that phone call.
Response #2 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)
What is to smash - an idea? I believe the vocabulary of the cult you seek to point out uses terms like smash.
If you find the established or old paradigm operates a model that costs so much more complexity of confusion, conflict and fear to maintain and support, than it offers in true service to life, then grow the new one.
In a nutshell, the state is an idea that manifests an institution that acquires a sense of its own existence or ego-centric distortion. The guardian becomes a guard, the protector a jailer, the communication device a block to communication.
The only ideas that will manifest are those that find acceptance and allegiance of recognition and value.
A coercive sense of self-existence seeks to determine these ideas to support its own private agendas - be they personal or corporately operating.
Thus communication itself has been usurped by war to convince, trick or persuade others what the perpetrator WANTS to be accepted true by others - for whatever reasons consciously held or unconsciously active.
A new paradigm is what is being recognized and shared and embodied as true value - rather than reactive or negatively defined reactions to an unwanted value.
Much as the warriors of grievance and frustration refuse to accept - this has to begin within oneself. Not as a thinking exercise of shifting the furniture around, but in the manner of a breakdown/breakthrough that is cooperatively embraced or perhaps passes through periods of deep unsettling - because it is our reality that is 'broken' - not the truth of whatever it is that we truly are - but our beliefs, thoughts and concepts that define our self - and therefore operate a model by which we see and share the world.
The state or cult that I seek to identify as the template that needs renewal and alignment is the cult of the identity of a command and control mentality. A fearful and fear inducing coercive and deceptive mentality. It can be seen as pervasive to every area of our life - because it is a false foundation.
The idea of coercing the coercion out of existence is simply a play within persistence. There is no way of fighting it to win because it is the very idea of fighting for something and will be fed by whatever side of whatever fight. Standing in one's integrity may look like fighting - but the key is being positively integrative. Siding with our inherent integrity and freedom is siding with all but refusing the bait of that which disintegrates and tyrannizes.
It is no surprise that 'the shadow power' owns the resistance as well as the state. it basically owns anything that becomes significant to its agenda - enough to make sure its interests are served in ways that keep it in shadow.
The mask can seem appealing or threatening but underneath is nothing anyone would choose, who had any capacity to choose. So the mask is also that which effectively denies the awareness of the capacity to freely choose. Another name for mask is persona. The netbot and spambot idea offers a sense of millions of infected PCs being wielded by shadow power. I propose that the antivirus software in our mind is in fact operating as a back door for shadow power to operate remotely and configure our own minds for its agenda. I am talking of 'fear'.
As long as individuals choose to propagate and support a cult of fear, true cultural renewal and expression will be undermined. The desire to 'make the really bad feelings go away' calls on any and every kind of deceit - including giving power to the State or to experts or rationalism or religion of any kind of ideology whatsoever.
Notice now that the institutions or ideas that WERE operative in keeping fear hidden or keeping us hidden in fear are breaking down. That is the end of the old paradigm - there is no persisting in it except perhaps an adventure in an even deeper descent into fear than we have yet imagined - and I say we are deeply down that rabbit hole already - as far as our identity of conditioned mind is concerned.
Fear is a mixture of self-conflicting elements that have no basis in truth - but only in reactive interplay in which an enemy is essential for maintaining such identity - what identity? Command and control. The wish for power. Pluck out the sin of our own mind and then see your world, your fellow man and the choices he makes and suffers as if done unto him.
All warriors of the grievance unite in denying the man of peace - because they cannot find support from him or a way to subvert or co-opt his will - simply because it is not in conflict with itself.
It is not true that Jesus was special or that the story of Jesus is serving a specialness that was irrelevant to any other human being with a willingness to listen. Fear has made a mask over it so as to neutralize its meaning - which is simply the meaning of putting aside the will to power - the persona-investment - and uncovering a will that is unconflicted.
the 'second coming' is the recognition of the meaning of our true will beneath the coercive deceptions of a hidden fear which we took as our own thinking.
True relations embody the culture of a tangibly shared sense of value. Just embody nothing ELSE and you will BE the new paradigm and an unselfconscious ambassador for a joy and integrity of being.
Or persist as a warrior of the grievance, a seeker of vengeance, a captain of the self-righteous or as Pink Floyd once put it; "a lead role in a cage". No one can put you there but you - and whatever else Mandela lived he demonstrated the mind is what imprisons - regardless the outer cage. But who wants freedom who already believes their freedom is reactive and oppositional identity?
Response #2A
Yes what works is what persists - according to the purpose held. When the model breaks down it may attempt more and more extreme attempts to control - yet adding control is what introduces instability into a system - at least in the sense I mean of coercive control. There are innate ways of control that are not fearful intervention but harmonic resonance. One can inspire a concerted effort. But attempting to manipulate a result by faking inspirations is like crying wolf. It soon uses up residual credibility.
I feel perhaps to qualify that Mind Is Free but that 'my mind' is a layer that imposes limitations and constraints - within mutually agreed and reinforced beliefs and definitions.
I find that realignment to true relations, operates a clarification in which what is completely false falls away and what was a confusion of true within false framing is restored to its true status.
If we look at our language, we can immediately see how we give power away.
Whatever else I do when I write or speak or think, I am vigilant for distortions. One starts wherever one is at - but there are ways we use our mind to make it seem limited and then believe our own spin.
Worth remembering that words (idea, definition, belief) SPELL and that our word operates whether we know what we are doing or not.
I'm not advocating political correctness - simply owning what we put out and being willing to stand in it or meet through it. So much that passes off is exactly that - passing off or masking.
If there is a new paradigm arising as the need of our time then it will be through a willingness to live it - in whatever way is our discovered way.
I'm more interested in the integrity of people in relations of shared interest than exactly what structures serve at any given moment. When communication is engaged - which ONLY occurs in freedom everything starts to synchronize and open up. So I feel to point to the blocks to freedom where they CAN be released - which is not really out there though we might use that to invalidate ourselves and not step up to the mark where the next step is waiting to lead us in unexpected directions.
I believe the world we manifest and perceive is directly reflective of the consciousness within of which we are mostly oblivious. But those who 'direct history' know well that ideas and beliefs structure and direct and organise perception and identity. But they are messing from the outside whereas within our mind we really do have a true power of command that is not coercive and divisive but whole.
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
A Capital idea - What!
Capitalism is under scrutiny - whatever it actually is - due not least to the financial system becoming clearly associated with a scam and a shadow power beneath mere appearances of governance.
This page brought the subject up. I simply wrote from where I feel to stand in what the idea brings up for me.
Capitalism: defending one's investment in getting more for less?
Capitalism: extending a tangible worth by growing it.
I feel everything in the world of a polarised and alloyed mentality can serve dual purpose. Nothing has but the meaning and purpose you give it. A split mind attempts to mix mutually contradictory purpose and loses all sense of foundation amidst its own convoluted spin. In believing its own spin dresses up in cleverness or pomp but has no real presence - as coercive and deceptive strategies reveal obvious.
In a 'seller's market' which is where a sense of lack, scarcity or insecurity is bought into or believed true in the terms framed, one can sell ideas that seem to answer the lack in the short term, yet capture and disconnect the sucker from their true nature, sustenance and wits.
The drive to sell to get operates the cultivation and herding of marketshare, mindshare.
Pyramid schemes pattern energy in consolidating tyrannous hierarchies.
After a while it is accepted as the human condition.
Of consciousness and society.
But Maslow's pyramid is upside down and inside out.
EVERYTHING extends its foundation and NOTHING can be unlike its foundation.
Once a split minded and devious thinking could be sold in exchange for promise of power and protection, a false foundation HAD to subvert every natural impulse to the mentality of a polarised struggle for survival. Because a lie HAS to struggle in asserting itself to survive AGAINST all that would expose it.
Everyone protects their investments. But to invest in a lie is to identify falsely.
Identity theft is the market of scammers. All trying to sucker each other or shifting alliances that sucker another, or protect against being suckered by others. Maybe wake up to find we are all suckers to identity theft.
So drawn into the drama of the game that few pause long enough to discern what they are truly doing and why. It runs like a template. There are moneylenders in the template who would interpose between a natural need being fulfilled so as to usurp the relational unfolding of growing trust and uncovering true synchronicity through extending communication.
The 'coercive will' operates primarily through insinuating and propagating definitions that frame everything in its own image. It owns the mind in which one thinks - until the identity theft is uncovered.
In a system where all aspects of it reinforce all other aspects of itself there is no real alternative but from a different foundation - only redistributions of assemblages in complex ... but increasing hollow... presentations.
What is the foundation? Is it not the lie that sets everything else up as a means to prevent and deny its own exposure?
The last or indeed the never thing one would meet or allow to be?
Yet is that not exactly what is being revealed on our Big Screen of a world; our foundation exposed? - and its inevitable results or consequences.
There is a true foundation to our existence. I don't ask you to believe it and certainly not to think or define it. But its re-cognition to awareness occurs exactly where a lie is seen as a lie, a wish as a wish, a story as a story. Because in that instant one is no longer identified within its frame. Now you can 'believe' and live out from that which Is you - beneath all that seemed real before.
Regardless of whatism, extending a tangible worth by growing it, operates in conscious alignment with Life-Purpose.
Recognizing what one is NOT is part of more truly knowing who you ARE. When the foundation shifts - all else shifts with it. Integrating and accepting may lag - but everything has changed without anything 'external' having to change.
Needs met, has been so materially defined as to deny the need of our own consciousness for a manually managed mechanical imposition upon us by powers set above communicability.
So one aspect of need that I put forward is for consciousness responsibility - for what passes as conscious is a conditioned reaction. Foundations are not ideas to impose - but qualities to make manifest - to give witness to.
Without the old foundational belief - the template crumbles. We have to 're-learn' how to live, relate, communicate. How to recognize and release a falsely identified investment and focus wholly on that which really embodies the Life as each is inspired or enthused and amused to pursue. Is that more frightening than Armageddon? If so, at least one understands why humanity self-destructs.
This page brought the subject up. I simply wrote from where I feel to stand in what the idea brings up for me.
Capitalism: defending one's investment in getting more for less?
Capitalism: extending a tangible worth by growing it.
I feel everything in the world of a polarised and alloyed mentality can serve dual purpose. Nothing has but the meaning and purpose you give it. A split mind attempts to mix mutually contradictory purpose and loses all sense of foundation amidst its own convoluted spin. In believing its own spin dresses up in cleverness or pomp but has no real presence - as coercive and deceptive strategies reveal obvious.
In a 'seller's market' which is where a sense of lack, scarcity or insecurity is bought into or believed true in the terms framed, one can sell ideas that seem to answer the lack in the short term, yet capture and disconnect the sucker from their true nature, sustenance and wits.
The drive to sell to get operates the cultivation and herding of marketshare, mindshare.
Pyramid schemes pattern energy in consolidating tyrannous hierarchies.
After a while it is accepted as the human condition.
Of consciousness and society.
But Maslow's pyramid is upside down and inside out.
EVERYTHING extends its foundation and NOTHING can be unlike its foundation.
Once a split minded and devious thinking could be sold in exchange for promise of power and protection, a false foundation HAD to subvert every natural impulse to the mentality of a polarised struggle for survival. Because a lie HAS to struggle in asserting itself to survive AGAINST all that would expose it.
Everyone protects their investments. But to invest in a lie is to identify falsely.
Identity theft is the market of scammers. All trying to sucker each other or shifting alliances that sucker another, or protect against being suckered by others. Maybe wake up to find we are all suckers to identity theft.
So drawn into the drama of the game that few pause long enough to discern what they are truly doing and why. It runs like a template. There are moneylenders in the template who would interpose between a natural need being fulfilled so as to usurp the relational unfolding of growing trust and uncovering true synchronicity through extending communication.
The 'coercive will' operates primarily through insinuating and propagating definitions that frame everything in its own image. It owns the mind in which one thinks - until the identity theft is uncovered.
In a system where all aspects of it reinforce all other aspects of itself there is no real alternative but from a different foundation - only redistributions of assemblages in complex ... but increasing hollow... presentations.
What is the foundation? Is it not the lie that sets everything else up as a means to prevent and deny its own exposure?
The last or indeed the never thing one would meet or allow to be?
Yet is that not exactly what is being revealed on our Big Screen of a world; our foundation exposed? - and its inevitable results or consequences.
There is a true foundation to our existence. I don't ask you to believe it and certainly not to think or define it. But its re-cognition to awareness occurs exactly where a lie is seen as a lie, a wish as a wish, a story as a story. Because in that instant one is no longer identified within its frame. Now you can 'believe' and live out from that which Is you - beneath all that seemed real before.
Regardless of whatism, extending a tangible worth by growing it, operates in conscious alignment with Life-Purpose.
Recognizing what one is NOT is part of more truly knowing who you ARE. When the foundation shifts - all else shifts with it. Integrating and accepting may lag - but everything has changed without anything 'external' having to change.
Needs met, has been so materially defined as to deny the need of our own consciousness for a manually managed mechanical imposition upon us by powers set above communicability.
So one aspect of need that I put forward is for consciousness responsibility - for what passes as conscious is a conditioned reaction. Foundations are not ideas to impose - but qualities to make manifest - to give witness to.
Without the old foundational belief - the template crumbles. We have to 're-learn' how to live, relate, communicate. How to recognize and release a falsely identified investment and focus wholly on that which really embodies the Life as each is inspired or enthused and amused to pursue. Is that more frightening than Armageddon? If so, at least one understands why humanity self-destructs.
Saturday, 1 November 2014
It's a racket
(Further reflections on the consciousness issues within the criminalisation/legalisation of drugs)
Oh blame is a fine thing! (not).
Underneath all of this is whether we choose to trust ourselves to relate, learn, and communicate in integrity, or whether we dont. If we dont, then we limit and coerce learning to fit in a coercive version of relationship and then propagandize it as if it works. It does work, if hiding from fear is the real need to be met.
'Protecting people from their learning' is more dangerous than anyone seems to realize.
It IS appropriate to protect children - but to wean them as they rise in their own explorations and capacities to balance responsibility as their consciousness.
The 'State' has become the 'parent' that now seeks to perpetuate dependency and propagate the idea that we are all so easily hurt, offended, damaged, that natural being is denied - and with that I assure you unnatural forces manipulate the 'State' to suck out all the wealth of cultural inheritance to evaporate in a passing and unquenchable appetite.
Cultural values are established by living them - not hiding in them as if they are a template to dress up in and mask a lack of true foundation.
There IS a huge demand for technologies/means to support the desire to remain UNconscious of a lack of true foundation, and so there is a huge market - which operates as a racket.
The answer is to bring everything into the light of a true foundation - which is uncovered in a willingness of communication itself - both intimate to our own consciousness and among ourselves in shared purpose.
The thinking of the world will say we are not ready, we cannot cope, we will be swept away by chaos, we will suffer great loss - and will do this by projecting onto others who are made the stooge for not being honest to one's own fear. Without honesty of consciousness, the mask imposes itself upon consciousness and creates the lack of Life that then seeks distraction and escape.
However... the mask IS disintegrating because the control mentality CANNOT control Life - and never will. The WISH to identify exclusively with a control mentality is what actually sets up the interference that then demands a control mentality. It's a racket.
Putting 'vulnerable' onto others is a displacement projection of un-owned fear. BUT those who have been fed and accepted such identity need a process of transitional support to wean from dependency and powerlessness into a culture of communication in shared worth.
How afraid are we? Afraid enough to crucify truth wherever it would expose us?
The psuedo-scientific promise of controlling systems so as to sanitize and anaesthetize the 'messy psycho-emotional energetic territory of transformation reveals the control mentality behind it, pretending to operate as 'protector or guide'. It is fear at cost of wholeness which fear inherently denies, until owned and transformed.
Oh blame is a fine thing! (not).
Underneath all of this is whether we choose to trust ourselves to relate, learn, and communicate in integrity, or whether we dont. If we dont, then we limit and coerce learning to fit in a coercive version of relationship and then propagandize it as if it works. It does work, if hiding from fear is the real need to be met.
'Protecting people from their learning' is more dangerous than anyone seems to realize.
It IS appropriate to protect children - but to wean them as they rise in their own explorations and capacities to balance responsibility as their consciousness.
The 'State' has become the 'parent' that now seeks to perpetuate dependency and propagate the idea that we are all so easily hurt, offended, damaged, that natural being is denied - and with that I assure you unnatural forces manipulate the 'State' to suck out all the wealth of cultural inheritance to evaporate in a passing and unquenchable appetite.
Cultural values are established by living them - not hiding in them as if they are a template to dress up in and mask a lack of true foundation.
There IS a huge demand for technologies/means to support the desire to remain UNconscious of a lack of true foundation, and so there is a huge market - which operates as a racket.
The answer is to bring everything into the light of a true foundation - which is uncovered in a willingness of communication itself - both intimate to our own consciousness and among ourselves in shared purpose.
The thinking of the world will say we are not ready, we cannot cope, we will be swept away by chaos, we will suffer great loss - and will do this by projecting onto others who are made the stooge for not being honest to one's own fear. Without honesty of consciousness, the mask imposes itself upon consciousness and creates the lack of Life that then seeks distraction and escape.
However... the mask IS disintegrating because the control mentality CANNOT control Life - and never will. The WISH to identify exclusively with a control mentality is what actually sets up the interference that then demands a control mentality. It's a racket.
Putting 'vulnerable' onto others is a displacement projection of un-owned fear. BUT those who have been fed and accepted such identity need a process of transitional support to wean from dependency and powerlessness into a culture of communication in shared worth.
How afraid are we? Afraid enough to crucify truth wherever it would expose us?
The psuedo-scientific promise of controlling systems so as to sanitize and anaesthetize the 'messy psycho-emotional energetic territory of transformation reveals the control mentality behind it, pretending to operate as 'protector or guide'. It is fear at cost of wholeness which fear inherently denies, until owned and transformed.
Friday, 24 October 2014
Science as rebellion?
The Institute of Art and Ideas - offers a rich and exciting willingness to question, to revisit or revise our ideas and our world with new perspectives.
- - -
Blessed are those whose intuitive faith challenges their experience, because our experience is a constructed reality of belief and definition, accepted true.
Believing is seeing, but of course what one says one believes is belied by one's actual experience and the inevitable reactions that automatically follow on from whatever interpretation IS currently operating.
The underlying 'revolution' is a separation device operating in consciousness whereby a mind seems to have become itself alone in conflict of identity and world in chaos that it takes as the basis to assume and assert power over itself and its world.
The intent to define and understand in this sense is an assertion of control imposed upon a natural order or relational unity that has been/is being temporarily disrupted by the separation device.
One can symbolize this and that's the way the older approaches to knowledge operate, in symbols that used archetypes to story the reflection of consciousness itself - that increasingly became disconnected from original context and became used more as modus of social control.
The reversal operates such that we become defined by our own conditioning, that is like saying we believe our own lies or fall under the spell of our own Word.
So it is appropriate that what seemed to 'get us locked into' limitation, conflict, and a disconnected sense that attempts to use its externally mapped world of others to 'fix or resolve or work out' its own 'salvation', validation, or however it so defines itself justified or complete.
Curiosity and imagination can be used to question the basis of our 'self' and its corresponding 'reality'. For not only is there no separate 'god' acting upon or coercing a Living Universe/Multiverse into existence, there is likewise no separate 'self'.
The layer or level of mind is but one facet and itself operates many levels at once - unconscious, so-called conscious, and superconscious - and we generally assert our surface consciousness to be ON TOP rather than notice it screens a selective focus of possibility from a vast range of probability of a truly infinite range of potential.
Human 'reality' is in some sense like a sandcastle upon an infinite beach - or a bubble in an infinite breaking wave - yet the power of the wave is in it, and the focus of the desire and intent that Life Know Itself guides, moves and supports it. For there IS no actual separation or disconnection from That which moves and gives form to the Formless. Nor can one use the vocabulary-ability of a separated self-sense to objectify or make coercive relation with it or under it.
Anything undertaken from the basis of a dis-integrating movement brings the reinforcement of a dis-integrated self and world; a self in pieces. Humpty the broken cosmic egg-o.
So yes; the willingness to accept that we do not KNOW operates to allow the Knowing that is the Communication of the Whole as the Part, and through the Part in communication extended and relationship embraced. The nature of Reality that is unchangeable is that existence is; and that the one is the all and the all are the one, and that what one puts out is what one gets back.
Such is Creation - not of a separate and separating 'god' but in God of God and as God - for That which Is is, but how you - as an integral expression of All That Is - choose to experience existence, is through the sharing of and in and as Idea. No way of experiencing - or rather - of being the gift-communication of experience itself is in itself more or less valid that any or instant or facet of Creation - not least because nothing is in and of itself alone and apart to be so judged. But what is or is not relevant and resonant to YOUR core signature vibration of focusing desire and exploration is natural to disregard in the creative unfolding of the revelation of ever novel ways to experience and relate and feel and know.
All 'self's' operate against their own Good when they are defined in misalignment with their true desire. Protecting the joyless by sacrificing one's joy is absurd seen in the clear. But the mind protects against being seen in the clear for fear of loss and of change of pain and loss, by which it has conditioned itself to survive against.
Coming back into alignment is also the uncovering of a greater clarity of purpose, of vision and of a more integral meaning from which to live and be. It is our natural inheritance from a prodigal exercise within 'as if' - for Source remains Is - and you Know "I am" as your own Indivisibility of being - regardless that the mind can play divide and rule upon its own models. 'What' anything is and how you choose to relate to it be seem to be conditioned and determined by a universe of cause and effect - but any of this can be challenged back to uncover its roots in the Word or definition/belief we put out - in the understanding that the collective agreements constitute a structure of experiencing that like a classroom, is not an authority to overthrow or a prison to break down - so much as a living framework of opportunity for teaching and learning in rich reflection and shared appreciation.
The mind of revolution/evolution can fade to the appreciation of mind as servant and instrument of truly creative freedom shared. It really is a matter of 'where we are coming from' rather than where we believe we have been and thus are conditioned to repeat round and round in revolving whilst ever struggling to evolve within such self conflicted futility.
Science is a valid exploration within the willingness to uncover truth. But without the love of truth there can only be assertions, coercions and war to establish the version that serves whatever it is that one is choosing to love INSTEAD. Consciousness is inherently responsible in the clear for it sees that it does unto itself. Questioning a version of consciousness that refuses to pause and open to revisit its foundations is not an act of war but of love, though not at first recognized such in a mind that believes division and control as the condition on which its own existence depends.
Science is Rebellion
Our knowledge, like the Earth, floats in nothingness, but this does not make it meaningless, says pioneering quantum physicist Carlo Rovelli; it actually makes it more precious.
- - -
Blessed are those whose intuitive faith challenges their experience, because our experience is a constructed reality of belief and definition, accepted true.
Believing is seeing, but of course what one says one believes is belied by one's actual experience and the inevitable reactions that automatically follow on from whatever interpretation IS currently operating.
The underlying 'revolution' is a separation device operating in consciousness whereby a mind seems to have become itself alone in conflict of identity and world in chaos that it takes as the basis to assume and assert power over itself and its world.
The intent to define and understand in this sense is an assertion of control imposed upon a natural order or relational unity that has been/is being temporarily disrupted by the separation device.
One can symbolize this and that's the way the older approaches to knowledge operate, in symbols that used archetypes to story the reflection of consciousness itself - that increasingly became disconnected from original context and became used more as modus of social control.
The reversal operates such that we become defined by our own conditioning, that is like saying we believe our own lies or fall under the spell of our own Word.
So it is appropriate that what seemed to 'get us locked into' limitation, conflict, and a disconnected sense that attempts to use its externally mapped world of others to 'fix or resolve or work out' its own 'salvation', validation, or however it so defines itself justified or complete.
Curiosity and imagination can be used to question the basis of our 'self' and its corresponding 'reality'. For not only is there no separate 'god' acting upon or coercing a Living Universe/Multiverse into existence, there is likewise no separate 'self'.
The layer or level of mind is but one facet and itself operates many levels at once - unconscious, so-called conscious, and superconscious - and we generally assert our surface consciousness to be ON TOP rather than notice it screens a selective focus of possibility from a vast range of probability of a truly infinite range of potential.
Human 'reality' is in some sense like a sandcastle upon an infinite beach - or a bubble in an infinite breaking wave - yet the power of the wave is in it, and the focus of the desire and intent that Life Know Itself guides, moves and supports it. For there IS no actual separation or disconnection from That which moves and gives form to the Formless. Nor can one use the vocabulary-ability of a separated self-sense to objectify or make coercive relation with it or under it.
Anything undertaken from the basis of a dis-integrating movement brings the reinforcement of a dis-integrated self and world; a self in pieces. Humpty the broken cosmic egg-o.
So yes; the willingness to accept that we do not KNOW operates to allow the Knowing that is the Communication of the Whole as the Part, and through the Part in communication extended and relationship embraced. The nature of Reality that is unchangeable is that existence is; and that the one is the all and the all are the one, and that what one puts out is what one gets back.
Such is Creation - not of a separate and separating 'god' but in God of God and as God - for That which Is is, but how you - as an integral expression of All That Is - choose to experience existence, is through the sharing of and in and as Idea. No way of experiencing - or rather - of being the gift-communication of experience itself is in itself more or less valid that any or instant or facet of Creation - not least because nothing is in and of itself alone and apart to be so judged. But what is or is not relevant and resonant to YOUR core signature vibration of focusing desire and exploration is natural to disregard in the creative unfolding of the revelation of ever novel ways to experience and relate and feel and know.
All 'self's' operate against their own Good when they are defined in misalignment with their true desire. Protecting the joyless by sacrificing one's joy is absurd seen in the clear. But the mind protects against being seen in the clear for fear of loss and of change of pain and loss, by which it has conditioned itself to survive against.
Coming back into alignment is also the uncovering of a greater clarity of purpose, of vision and of a more integral meaning from which to live and be. It is our natural inheritance from a prodigal exercise within 'as if' - for Source remains Is - and you Know "I am" as your own Indivisibility of being - regardless that the mind can play divide and rule upon its own models. 'What' anything is and how you choose to relate to it be seem to be conditioned and determined by a universe of cause and effect - but any of this can be challenged back to uncover its roots in the Word or definition/belief we put out - in the understanding that the collective agreements constitute a structure of experiencing that like a classroom, is not an authority to overthrow or a prison to break down - so much as a living framework of opportunity for teaching and learning in rich reflection and shared appreciation.
The mind of revolution/evolution can fade to the appreciation of mind as servant and instrument of truly creative freedom shared. It really is a matter of 'where we are coming from' rather than where we believe we have been and thus are conditioned to repeat round and round in revolving whilst ever struggling to evolve within such self conflicted futility.
Science is a valid exploration within the willingness to uncover truth. But without the love of truth there can only be assertions, coercions and war to establish the version that serves whatever it is that one is choosing to love INSTEAD. Consciousness is inherently responsible in the clear for it sees that it does unto itself. Questioning a version of consciousness that refuses to pause and open to revisit its foundations is not an act of war but of love, though not at first recognized such in a mind that believes division and control as the condition on which its own existence depends.
Tuesday, 21 October 2014
Cultural renewal is an act of individual appreciation
In a conversation on the future and role of a web site for the circle dance network was said:
- - -
Over the longer term, I'd like to see it develop/link to consolidated resources of material such as notes on dances, e.g. their origins, sources of music, cultural notes, etc.
- - -
I felt this rep lie expand out of the question:
So I ask, what is the 'it' that will in time develop and link to consolidated resources for the dance?
The control/withholding/owning of information feels to me to be a defining paradigm of an age that I feel is coming to its end. I feel that anything operating on this basis will fade with it.
Not that anything 'should' be free, or that sources 'should' be ignored, usurped, dishonoured, repackaged and sold. There is an energetic basis for the communication and exchange of energy that is a living relationship and not a system of steps set in stone.
Life can operate or unfold as a matter of integration as communication of a nature, that the 'control/withholding/owning mentality' obscures, denies, or distorts to render unrecognisable and therefore untrustworthy.
Because I hold the dance within the sense of a reintegrating movement of being, I feel to accept and align with that movement - as I uncover the seeming blocks and relax through them. Indeed I see life as the process of such apparent blocks rising in order to be re-cognized or known again in an original perspective instead of the assertion of a mentality that arises from a negatively or fearfully defined sense of disconnected self - and seeks to eradicate them in perpetual war.
I put that first because without a foundation, there is no basis for change. The old foundation can only persist in a depleting and burdensome struggle.
So I ask, what is the 'it' that will in time develop and link to consolidated resources for the dance?
There is no 'it', only us - and perhaps there is no us excepting as we each re-cognize our self in the desire or movement of being that is
... the willingness to begin,
... the motive power to do and sustain,
... the guiding consciousness to direct,
... the appreciation of fulfilment shared.
So the idea of the 'it' is all too easily the wishful rehearsal of ideas that perhaps fish for something to line up as transaction without the transformative process of relationship, involvement and embrace. It is sort of talking in code so as to make our now seem to be 'later' so as to attend to something else given precedence in the 'meanwhile'.
I don't say any of this in rebuke or blame whatsoever - but simply to notice that we all know how to operate in coded ways that tend to mask or cover over facets of our self or our relationship that we sought to hide from or indeed hide in.
In order to be able to develop and link and share in such a venture we need to embody a different consciousness than the judgemental right/wrong, either/or mentality - much as our personal mythology might be predicated on it.
A process of communication, honourably engaged, has an outcome that all who are willing to share in it, can walk with. The attempt to coerce the outcome is always a denial or avoidance of communication as assertion of personal or private agenda - which is often operating unconsciously UNTIL it comes up to awareness as a dissonance of communication in relationship.
No one 'should' engage in communication or relationship of commitment, but such is life already. A true and honest accounting of what we accept as true of us and are thus committed to as the basis of our relationships is our integrity. If we persist in choosing out of alignment with our integrity, we experience disconnection and loss and thus attempt to operate from a sense of independence that we do not have - although we can assert the wish of a segratively defined sense of self and play its experience out in such a way as to believe we are as defined in the story and are not the scriptwriter.
I know that in attempting to articulate a different perspective, I become unintelligable in the same way that a non dancer can be dropped into a vocabulary of rhythm and movement and neither know what is going on, nor have any handle on it to begin to get with it - until they relax the models that simply don't fit - and be open to receive the living information, guidance or direction that does.
To give oneself wholly to what one loves or is moved or inspired to do - to the best of one' current ability - is the key to living in any given moment. But to live this is to be willing to challenge or enquire as to how and why one actually IS choosing to squelch or limit or invalidate that which truly, is you.
Being no more and no less but exactly who we are is the condition in which all else is appreciated as it is. The attempt to defend and maintain who one is not is no longer finding the music to support it - and thus generates conflict in order to 'survive and prevail'.
Authenticity and integrity are not constructed or derived from external author-ity without uncovering one's own, nor asserted without due honouring of the true authority working through the willingness of others that join and link in shared purpose as the dance of life - which is not really about 'getting there' or becoming someone' so much as being this moment of unfolding as a creative act.
In Peace
Brian
Sunday, 19 October 2014
Endgame: awakening
I have come across a site called Medialens. I bookmarked it and registered to be able to interact in its Forum.
Another member posted an extract of premises from a book called 'ENDGAME' and after reading it I felt to write the following:
I'm looking around on my first visit here. Attracted to the principles in media lens.org as I am to mind-watching.
I 'come from' a background in consciousness rather than from thinking and generally blog or comment to invite and promote what I sometimes call 'consciousness responsibility'.
I appreciate the points raised but feel that our tendency as thinkers is to persist from presumptions that are believed but invisible to us and mutually reinforced as part of the human conditioning, not least by thievery definitions, (That was a typo but I recognised it serves even better than what I was intending to write), by which our particular patterning of human experience is templated upon.
I hold it is the foundation of identity in false and therefore conflicted and fearful definition, that results in unsustainable, parasitic, heart-denying, vengeance seeking, self-hating, death worshipping, etc etc etc.
However, one has to start from where one is - including where one believes one is, and while one believes one's beliefs are unchallengable fact - (and not beliefs at all). IN THIS SENSE there is no shame in where we come from when we come TO a willingness to challenge what I feel you rightly describe as an insanity.
Guilt operates as a denial and invalidation of consciousness as creative and compassionate freedom. What kind of civilisation can shine and flower WITHOUT creative freedom aligned with the Qualities of Life? Clearly, this is what is being explored in this time - among many other strands of possibility. And part of this exploration is the transformation of consciousness from a sleeping identification within the illusion of power, to the waking responsibility within the power of illusion.
No matter how many millions seem to conform to or support certain ideas, the ideas themselves are attributes of consciousness - albeit reinforced through their cultural manifestations. And they are conflicting ideas - generating the idea of conflict as self-definition - upon which an attempt to mitigate, or contain chaotic conflict has been invoked, summoned, applied and identified with as the unsustainable but persisting sense of structure, continuity and order, many of us take as our 'self'.
The protection can serve a function of damping the most extreme fears to allow a period or relative stability - IN WHICH LEARNING MAY OCCUR. In many ways this is like the role of parent who holds the conditions of safety and succour while the new member acquires the appropriate orientations and skills to be able to follow their own life purpose or theme of experience and discovery.
That the guardian becomes a guard and the protection, a racket, is an accumulating fruit of the tares in the wheat - for the oppositional identity is that which denies its Source as the condition of its assertion of independent existence. This is the 'disconnecting or split off mentality that is founded on insane premix of the lie and the father of the lie - which is the WISH to be an independent private authoriser or power in one's own right.
To the mind in its addictive identification within such wish - ANYTHING that would expose its foundation is felt as a direct threat, to which it reacts with whatever defences neutralise that threat.
In short, the kind of devices and deceptions we are more readily seeing in our world, are reflecting the way our consciousness has been predicated. The moneylenders in the template are that interloping or usurping imposition of attempt to own and control that can ONLY result in fearful and life-denying limitation and depletion.
The template is not visible to the drama obsessed because they are so engaged in their own interpretive experience as it reinforces their perceived need, that they do not pause from reaction so as to allow the perspective to rise in which to discern anything clearly at all.
There is both the individual template of idea, definitions and themes, as well as the individual agreement within the collective template. For we are not as separated from each other or our world as our thinking suggests and our perceptions report back.
Willingness to pause or disinvest of the disconnecting, fear based, segregative identity of divide and rule - which operates through any and all masks or disguises, allows the restitution of our truly integrative and creative embrace of Life to undo the misalignments that express and support a self-delusional war with the Life, unrecognised - by bringing them into a true willingness and witness of communication, free of coercion.
Change the template and all that proceed THROUGH IT will reflect accordingly. But this is the very antithesis of coercion, for coercion seeks to fit or force the manifestation into a private agenda whereas noticing the mind-in-act and owning one's own choices, allows one to act FROM the truly creative level of choosing afresh, in alignment with a real relationship, now, instead of re-enacting a past in which change itself became as if the enemy and life an attempt to survive it by asserting defence offensively in attempt to prevail.
True dominion is the sovereign will that recognises itself in others and in life and the world because it embraces and knows its own thought as the shared movement of unfolding creation. When we give negative energy to what does not hold resonance and relevance to our core identity AS Life, we continue to manifest what we reject from consciousness instead of giving it disregard.
The reintegrative movement is not at war with the segregative movement. It uses everything - including the negative - to serve a positive understanding or perspective of appreciation.
Clearly this is not something we humanly DO - so much as something we allow to be done through us in such moment of noticing, pause, willingness and permission to embrace a true authority - that operates unselfconsciously via a release of the inhibition to love.
The motivation is universally toward that which we define as our Good or our pleasure or fulfilment and away from what we define as our pain or loss. The wide variation of behaviours and motivations arises from what we each - in any moment - define ourselves to be, in relation TO that moment, situation or relationship.
The reactive mechanism would be a perpetual motion but for a limit to the capacity to tolerate pain - be that apparently spiritual, mental-emotional or physically defined. Ingenuity seeks to preserve the misalignment whilst minimising the pain. Yet an honest account or owning of the pain serves the waking to the true need and the aligning to its being met.
The kind of society that arises from innate freedom rather than the search to BECOME free is different. Not least in that it unfolds out of its own movement of cooperative communion with Life instead of trying to put Humpty together again in the King's name.
There is no way to think oneself into freedom or awakening as consciousness because such thinking IS the attempt to persist within the misalignment whilst masking the symptoms. But listening and indeed speaking the movement of the heart is not thinking, so much as 'not getting in the way'.
Learning how to be consciousness as a flow of being without getting in one's own way is not an accumulation of techniques to then apply as an act of a seemingly separate will, so much as learning by doing, in which relevant information syncs with the willingness to Live, rather than accept a definition of life in which Life is denied. It is only ever THIS moment in which consciousness responsibility can be resumed/accepted and embraced as freedom at the creative level, to recognize, communicate, relate and appreciate.
What we DO proceeds automatically from what we hold true - unless we inhibit its expression, in which case we do not yet accept what we say we hold true AS true. The feelings of guilt, self-conflict and inadequacy or failure have to be 'reconfigured' to inspire curiosity as to what one is ACTUALLY believing try for such results to manifest. An innocent asking can uncover what a sophisticated and experience-conditioned mind cannot… because the former does not presume it SHOULD know, nor expect that knowing is withheld. While the latter is possessed of loss by seeking private gain.
Another member posted an extract of premises from a book called 'ENDGAME' and after reading it I felt to write the following:
I'm looking around on my first visit here. Attracted to the principles in media lens.org as I am to mind-watching.
I 'come from' a background in consciousness rather than from thinking and generally blog or comment to invite and promote what I sometimes call 'consciousness responsibility'.
I appreciate the points raised but feel that our tendency as thinkers is to persist from presumptions that are believed but invisible to us and mutually reinforced as part of the human conditioning, not least by thievery definitions, (That was a typo but I recognised it serves even better than what I was intending to write), by which our particular patterning of human experience is templated upon.
I hold it is the foundation of identity in false and therefore conflicted and fearful definition, that results in unsustainable, parasitic, heart-denying, vengeance seeking, self-hating, death worshipping, etc etc etc.
However, one has to start from where one is - including where one believes one is, and while one believes one's beliefs are unchallengable fact - (and not beliefs at all). IN THIS SENSE there is no shame in where we come from when we come TO a willingness to challenge what I feel you rightly describe as an insanity.
Guilt operates as a denial and invalidation of consciousness as creative and compassionate freedom. What kind of civilisation can shine and flower WITHOUT creative freedom aligned with the Qualities of Life? Clearly, this is what is being explored in this time - among many other strands of possibility. And part of this exploration is the transformation of consciousness from a sleeping identification within the illusion of power, to the waking responsibility within the power of illusion.
No matter how many millions seem to conform to or support certain ideas, the ideas themselves are attributes of consciousness - albeit reinforced through their cultural manifestations. And they are conflicting ideas - generating the idea of conflict as self-definition - upon which an attempt to mitigate, or contain chaotic conflict has been invoked, summoned, applied and identified with as the unsustainable but persisting sense of structure, continuity and order, many of us take as our 'self'.
The protection can serve a function of damping the most extreme fears to allow a period or relative stability - IN WHICH LEARNING MAY OCCUR. In many ways this is like the role of parent who holds the conditions of safety and succour while the new member acquires the appropriate orientations and skills to be able to follow their own life purpose or theme of experience and discovery.
That the guardian becomes a guard and the protection, a racket, is an accumulating fruit of the tares in the wheat - for the oppositional identity is that which denies its Source as the condition of its assertion of independent existence. This is the 'disconnecting or split off mentality that is founded on insane premix of the lie and the father of the lie - which is the WISH to be an independent private authoriser or power in one's own right.
To the mind in its addictive identification within such wish - ANYTHING that would expose its foundation is felt as a direct threat, to which it reacts with whatever defences neutralise that threat.
In short, the kind of devices and deceptions we are more readily seeing in our world, are reflecting the way our consciousness has been predicated. The moneylenders in the template are that interloping or usurping imposition of attempt to own and control that can ONLY result in fearful and life-denying limitation and depletion.
The template is not visible to the drama obsessed because they are so engaged in their own interpretive experience as it reinforces their perceived need, that they do not pause from reaction so as to allow the perspective to rise in which to discern anything clearly at all.
There is both the individual template of idea, definitions and themes, as well as the individual agreement within the collective template. For we are not as separated from each other or our world as our thinking suggests and our perceptions report back.
Willingness to pause or disinvest of the disconnecting, fear based, segregative identity of divide and rule - which operates through any and all masks or disguises, allows the restitution of our truly integrative and creative embrace of Life to undo the misalignments that express and support a self-delusional war with the Life, unrecognised - by bringing them into a true willingness and witness of communication, free of coercion.
Change the template and all that proceed THROUGH IT will reflect accordingly. But this is the very antithesis of coercion, for coercion seeks to fit or force the manifestation into a private agenda whereas noticing the mind-in-act and owning one's own choices, allows one to act FROM the truly creative level of choosing afresh, in alignment with a real relationship, now, instead of re-enacting a past in which change itself became as if the enemy and life an attempt to survive it by asserting defence offensively in attempt to prevail.
True dominion is the sovereign will that recognises itself in others and in life and the world because it embraces and knows its own thought as the shared movement of unfolding creation. When we give negative energy to what does not hold resonance and relevance to our core identity AS Life, we continue to manifest what we reject from consciousness instead of giving it disregard.
The reintegrative movement is not at war with the segregative movement. It uses everything - including the negative - to serve a positive understanding or perspective of appreciation.
Clearly this is not something we humanly DO - so much as something we allow to be done through us in such moment of noticing, pause, willingness and permission to embrace a true authority - that operates unselfconsciously via a release of the inhibition to love.
The motivation is universally toward that which we define as our Good or our pleasure or fulfilment and away from what we define as our pain or loss. The wide variation of behaviours and motivations arises from what we each - in any moment - define ourselves to be, in relation TO that moment, situation or relationship.
The reactive mechanism would be a perpetual motion but for a limit to the capacity to tolerate pain - be that apparently spiritual, mental-emotional or physically defined. Ingenuity seeks to preserve the misalignment whilst minimising the pain. Yet an honest account or owning of the pain serves the waking to the true need and the aligning to its being met.
The kind of society that arises from innate freedom rather than the search to BECOME free is different. Not least in that it unfolds out of its own movement of cooperative communion with Life instead of trying to put Humpty together again in the King's name.
There is no way to think oneself into freedom or awakening as consciousness because such thinking IS the attempt to persist within the misalignment whilst masking the symptoms. But listening and indeed speaking the movement of the heart is not thinking, so much as 'not getting in the way'.
Learning how to be consciousness as a flow of being without getting in one's own way is not an accumulation of techniques to then apply as an act of a seemingly separate will, so much as learning by doing, in which relevant information syncs with the willingness to Live, rather than accept a definition of life in which Life is denied. It is only ever THIS moment in which consciousness responsibility can be resumed/accepted and embraced as freedom at the creative level, to recognize, communicate, relate and appreciate.
What we DO proceeds automatically from what we hold true - unless we inhibit its expression, in which case we do not yet accept what we say we hold true AS true. The feelings of guilt, self-conflict and inadequacy or failure have to be 'reconfigured' to inspire curiosity as to what one is ACTUALLY believing try for such results to manifest. An innocent asking can uncover what a sophisticated and experience-conditioned mind cannot… because the former does not presume it SHOULD know, nor expect that knowing is withheld. While the latter is possessed of loss by seeking private gain.
Thursday, 28 August 2014
Every day [sex]-ism
Sex-fantasy objectivism operates as private association (or mutual reinforcement of fantasy associations) which is inherently at the expense of and in fear and withdrawal from, an actual intimacy of relation-ship or communication.
Disassociated and split persona operate as if they were 'free' to fulfil a sense of inadequacy and lack by getting from others what their fantasy symbolizes to them.
Paradise seeking stems from the sense of an Innocence of true embrace lost, but in negatively defined self MUST seek outside itself - for a fearfully defined sense of self proceeds on the basis of being NOT love, of NOT deserving love, or NOT being safe to open to love. And all of its attempts to regain a sense of connection externally via masked and wishful strategies of persuasion and coercion bring about the failure to love or communicate or be adequate to a situation or relationship and thus reinforce the foundational belief of unworthiness to love.
Likewise the negatively defined self wants and seeks to be validated by others and moulds itself in social adaptation to fit in with what it hopes or believes will win approval and acceptance ... or at least protect against being judged against and rejected. In focusing and identifying in the persona as if this was one's self and life, one interprets the actions of others so as to support and reinforce one's script - even when the experiences themselves are negative.
Other-ism can take any and every form because it is the choice to see the form based meanings that our personal and social definitions accepts as reality, INSTEAD of living the relationship that is actually present. INSTEAD of living from the integrity of a positively defined sense of self. The willingness to reintegrate from the masked or split self-sense shifts from an exclusive focus on the 'me' of one's personality structure, to the revealed relationship that is energetically unfolding.
Whereas the persona-based self operates within a surface reality dictated by thoughts, the actual relationship includes the observation of one's thoughts and the capacity to accept or not accept thought that otherwise runs like a programme of conditioned reactions. A negatively defined sense of self works as a hidden agenda; a covert operation, a fear-protected sense of specialness that inherently blanks or judges others and uses then strategically and presumes the same mind at work in others. There is no love in the kill or be killed mentality and universe - but there is the cultivation of coercive masks and behaviours that pass off as love and thus provide advantage or protection not only for secret sense of a persona under threat, but for a society that hides together in darkness.
To be true to oneself is to align with the love that you are - regardless that one may not feel or perceive this way while still entangled in the masking persona of attempt to substitute love - as if what Innocence once freely shared now must be manually applied or maintained or protected.
Innocence is lost to our awareness when we shift into the protective and socially adapting mask of our personae. But it is only covered over and distracted from by the addictive engagement with the private thinking beneath the mask.
Much of our thought runs unconscious and is part of what aligns our experiences and colours and patterns our relationships and communications.
Willingness to uncover the core curiosity of our being is of that spark of Innocence that can be covered over but never truly lost. Guilt, fear, blame and shame all conspire to 'protect' what seems to be a residual relative innocence amidst an otherwise overwhelming chaos of conflicted self-sense - or experience.
Responsibility is not about blame - at all - but is uncovering the grounding truth that OF ITSELF embraces and supports you in being and doing and relating and communicating what and who you are as a living presence.
One CAN call for correction from a sense of self that is itself willing to allign truly - and this is entirely different in feel and in frequency and in effect from the call for vengeance - no matter how disguised it may be in the strategies and mores of the social masks of self-righteousness.
Bringing one's experience into the light of a present awareness, and into the arena of a shared sense of value, will serve to heal it of distortions and misperceptions unless the revealed insights are simply repurposed to reinforce a subtler and more sophisticated mask OF self-righteousness.
'Self-wrongteousness' used to be called sin; a sense of lack, inadequacy, powerlessness, self-conflicting division and dis-ease that operates as meanspirited and loveless thinking that seems like an 'evil will' which not only cares nothing for others - it cares not for anything except its self - as it defines itself to be, and in your name.
The sense of dissonance from which all such self-conflicting confusion arises is not escaped by such strategies - but only disguised. When one's experience no longer serves as the hiding place from which to wield power or shield from those wielding power, there can be the noticing of qualities present that are not actually part of the drama. A light can stir in the mind that was dark. True questions and answers flow in place of a managed confusion spinnning ever more deceit and inevitable defeat.
Trying to be and do what we alone are never conceived or designed to be and do is a futility. The key is the word alone - for one is never alone in the way fear-thinking has come to assert and experience. Relationship and communication are the very core nature of our awareness, our existence, our consciousness, feeling, thought, word and deed. Learning to listen instead of reacting, allows a capacity of choosing to grow in place of a sense of victimhood. Use everything without exception as a means to realign and reintegrate you with You... or persist in a sense of self-exceptionalism that seesaws in futile attempts to deny, fight, overcome or eradicate a negative that does not manifest without serving You in some way on some level, known or unknown.
What we resist, persists. Hanging in there with your integrity - and therefore with Life's Integrity is not a fight against evil, but a persistent sense of faithfulness to what you know or have the faith of willingness to know, as the truth of your desire.
Saturday, 23 August 2014
Robots replace humans from within?
Robots must learn to value humans or 'they could kill us out of kindness'
Is it not at all obvious that humans are allowing themselves to be reduced to mechanism, into robots that operate along conditioned 'rational' rules imposed by 'programmers' or manipulators who use pseudo-science in corporate corruption within a financial system that is owned and controlled no less than 'science'.
Truly human values are not fearful programmed rules of conflict aversion disguised in wishful moral symbolic presentation. They are embodied presence as the qualities of our unalloyed Human Spirit.
Just to list them is not to communicate them.To rationalize or think about them is not to embody them. It takes one to know one. Mere thinking is not the same foundation as is the willingness to let Life communicate through our thought, word and deed - rather than persist in a robotic programmings of a fearful attempt to operate as if rationality were a god of separate-ness rather than Reason being the sanity of our wholeness.
Sunday, 17 August 2014
Fear operates a hidden agenda
The following article prompted a deeper response than that framed by its premises.
The context I write to is one where fear, confusion, distrust, and conflict generate a fear of 'evil' and unconsciously becoming defined and used by the very thing we hate and fear.
- - -
The hidden agendas running through so much that once was accepted currency of meaning, communication and exchange are as complex as the 'financial instruments' that attempt to coerce outcomes supposedly to 'maintain the economy' yet actually corrupt and work against true health, wealth and happiness.
One always uses 100% faith… it is just a matter of what it is invested in. The corruptions of our own thinking run deep, and no matter how much we may like to apportion blame and cry foul, we are collectively and individually in a net of our own deceits. This is not really news, human uses of consciousness have ever tended to ignorance and arrogance.
There are many facets to waking up. One is of the challenging and breaking of ideas and world-views that were presumed Reality, nut to serve Awakening in a true sense this is occurring within a willingness for integration instead of the wilfulness of a segregative, 'disconnecting' sense of self.
The story teaching and way showing symbol of Jesus operates as a reconnecting with the Reintegrating wholeness of being but its message is adulterated, diluted and effectively covered over by fear-based (segregative) interpretation. It does not matter what serves as the bridge or portal to such Awakened perspective and practice so much as that the communication of one's true presence underlines one's word and deed.
It takes one to know one. True presence is not coercive, therefore to regain a full awareness of own native or original nature and perspective, one will find oneself stepping outside the coercive mentality of justifying hate and pretending it to be power, appealing to fear as protector and guide as if it were a saviour, or employing guilt as a means to control and coerce our own mind or the minds of others.
Freedom cannot be thrust onto one long-chained in darkness, but it can be uncovered in true willingness, step by step by step.
Fear of death, disease, disaster, disgrace or pain and humiliation will have highly imaginative and active components.
I am talking about a self-honesty here at a level that goes far beyond ones presentations to the world or one's own self justifying mentality.
Fear of any kind distorts perception and thus sets up apparent oppositional wills and powers to Life - while it is being used to hide in, and being hidden from.
Moving through fear as it rises up and dissolves is a purificatory transformation.
Identifying with a fearfully defined segregated and separated self-sense does not recognise this Movement of Healing - but interprets it fearfully as loss and death and so defines itself against Life and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The blind will lead the blind always to maintain darkness. If you unsubscribe from such a 'guide to nowhere' you allow and invite the Guide for Life and Light to illuminate and prompt your noticing and choices in all things - including the good housekeeping and appropriate corrective actions in the case of healthy running and undoing or releasing negative choices and their effects.
In simple terms to pause amidst the baiting of reaction and check in at the heart will serve you and others well. The depth of this willingness and honesty will grow as it is lived. Living with a false integrity is living a lie; no matter how forcefully lies are asserted they cannot express and extend the truth of you - and nor will their reflections witness unto the truth of you.
Love is not what you do - it is what you are. But unless you live out what is revealed to you THROUGH you. YOU deny your life. Not 'them'. Not germs and toxins - excepting as we have all conspired to project our fear of evil OUT THERE.
The power that we 'give away' abides yet where it never left. We always operate 100% faith but where it is given can be cunningly hidden so as to hold onto a sense of specialness and self-power while playing the weak victim.
Learn to discern willingly ...if you will.
One always uses 100% faith… it is just a matter of what it is invested in. The corruptions of our own thinking run deep, and no matter how much we may like to apportion blame and cry foul, we are collectively and individually in a net of our own deceits. This is not really news, human uses of consciousness have ever tended to ignorance and arrogance.
There are many facets to waking up. One is of the challenging and breaking of ideas and world-views that were presumed Reality, nut to serve Awakening in a true sense this is occurring within a willingness for integration instead of the wilfulness of a segregative, 'disconnecting' sense of self.
The story teaching and way showing symbol of Jesus operates as a reconnecting with the Reintegrating wholeness of being but its message is adulterated, diluted and effectively covered over by fear-based (segregative) interpretation. It does not matter what serves as the bridge or portal to such Awakened perspective and practice so much as that the communication of one's true presence underlines one's word and deed.
It takes one to know one. True presence is not coercive, therefore to regain a full awareness of own native or original nature and perspective, one will find oneself stepping outside the coercive mentality of justifying hate and pretending it to be power, appealing to fear as protector and guide as if it were a saviour, or employing guilt as a means to control and coerce our own mind or the minds of others.
Freedom cannot be thrust onto one long-chained in darkness, but it can be uncovered in true willingness, step by step by step.
Fear of death, disease, disaster, disgrace or pain and humiliation will have highly imaginative and active components.
I am talking about a self-honesty here at a level that goes far beyond ones presentations to the world or one's own self justifying mentality.
Fear of any kind distorts perception and thus sets up apparent oppositional wills and powers to Life - while it is being used to hide in, and being hidden from.
Moving through fear as it rises up and dissolves is a purificatory transformation.
Identifying with a fearfully defined segregated and separated self-sense does not recognise this Movement of Healing - but interprets it fearfully as loss and death and so defines itself against Life and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The blind will lead the blind always to maintain darkness. If you unsubscribe from such a 'guide to nowhere' you allow and invite the Guide for Life and Light to illuminate and prompt your noticing and choices in all things - including the good housekeeping and appropriate corrective actions in the case of healthy running and undoing or releasing negative choices and their effects.
In simple terms to pause amidst the baiting of reaction and check in at the heart will serve you and others well. The depth of this willingness and honesty will grow as it is lived. Living with a false integrity is living a lie; no matter how forcefully lies are asserted they cannot express and extend the truth of you - and nor will their reflections witness unto the truth of you.
Love is not what you do - it is what you are. But unless you live out what is revealed to you THROUGH you. YOU deny your life. Not 'them'. Not germs and toxins - excepting as we have all conspired to project our fear of evil OUT THERE.
The power that we 'give away' abides yet where it never left. We always operate 100% faith but where it is given can be cunningly hidden so as to hold onto a sense of specialness and self-power while playing the weak victim.
Learn to discern willingly ...if you will.
Fear contracts upon itself and rejects wholeness.
Compassion Embraces. The true recognises Itself. The false falls away of itself.
Compassion Embraces. The true recognises Itself. The false falls away of itself.
Friday, 15 August 2014
Moneylenders in the Template
Though I wrote this into:
http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/35561/Right-on-Time-Calls-for-EU-Inflation/
It is simply an essay sketching in the realm of the financial aspect of our consciousness and thus of our cultures, locally and in many senses globally.
i appreciate the commenters here for whatever they feel moved to share. I don't write to compete with or assert but simply to share in what can be used for reflection or passed by. Culture is not a rational construct and does not conform to rational ideologies or systems of rational mapping out because despite lower levels of our mind being just like a computer in certain respects, there is a creative level that is in and of the heart - which is symbolic of the wholeness or unified consciousness and which resonance is felt in the heart as a whole body sense of Life, connection, joy. Culture is a collective consciousness structure but its forms tend to lose their original connection with the sense of value that gave rise to them and become disconnected derivatives that are then mixed up in unrelated ways with other derivatives and conflicted meanings render the structure unstable and without integrity.
The transactional aspect of our living reflects deeply held ideas in consciousness and culture - or collective currency of ideas, not least because we associate money and wealth, with our most fundamental ability to access and perpetuate our security and survival - but also with the power to store it and use it to serve and embody the purposes of growing or becoming along the lines of our desires.
The 'moneylenders in the template' are not merely external agencies in the world, but embodiments of an attempt to coercively own or control the system itself - whilst in the guise of serving the common good or indeed the 'economic recovery'. To address the outer without the inner is the attempt to bypass one's own transformational healing or correction; which is to reseed the same tares in the new field of endeavour.
A qualitative discernment has little voice in a conflict framed in quantitative terms, as if all is equally reducible to flat data analysis. But the only real correction to error is to align with what is found to serve unified purpose - and an active willingness in this direction will illuminate anything that is out of alignment. An unwillingness to accept correction operates as a kind of refusal to communicate backed by a host of highly charged emotionally backed non-negotiable fears. (That come into play when conditions are not met). Hence communication is weaponised as propaganda and the arts of asserting a 'winning hand' or a competency by deceit.
All things align and serve the purpose of their foundation. I don't pretend or try to understand complex financial instruments, but I can sense a coercive intent as can anyone else who isn't distracted by fear or perhaps baited by the deeper fear of greed - and ignorantly and arrogantly think they can use it AND control its effect.
Correction isn't so much a choice of whether, as of when, and in what manner. That which undermines even its own stability and integrity cannot be held to 'work' and be given allegiance indefinitely however it shape-shifts and rebrands itself.
A coercive mentality is always associated with a fearful mentality - though perhaps most expertly self-disguised in those whose urge is in wielding power rather than sharing it. Nothing so blind as an addiction and the addict sometimes the last to own it.
Sharing power isn't giving power away, but is sharing purpose in principled and open communication. In desire for a truly helpful outcome, one operates out from a different foundation, in place of defending a fragmented and conflicted distortion that seeks to preserve itself at the expense of the whole - and of others - because it identifies itself as a whole - over and against others and is blind to wholeness thereby.
All props and symbols in our world that have currency in our culture are founded in Consciousness either directly or as derivatives of derivatives of derivatives… and these become the template of our cultures, at the collective and local and personal level that are acted out FROM. When the template no longer serves a true channel of connection, it is time to be restored, refreshed, realigned so as to regain creative relationship.
The accounting for toxic debt is done in each and every consciousness. Or it recycles in a sort of reverse 'pass the parcel' game that operates in worldy terms as a consolidation of the power of coercive intent and effect. Our personal accounting is not merely to write off the valueless and redeem the truly valuable, but to identify the devices and practices of intent whereby we adulterated or diluted and undermined our truly valuable with 'Trojan money'.
Don't just teach a man to not be phished, teach him/her to learn how to not be phished again.
Fear operates as a false currency. The so called war on terror is a device among many, for the consolidation of power as an expression OF terror although coercion can use persuasion in most cases - once the essential power has revealed itself. However when it does is when its lack of validity can be seen clearly and allegiance withdrawn.
Computers are restored or reset to factory defaults to undo corruptions, when they cannot be identified and fixed otherwise. Insofar as we are 'programmes' we are also resetable by a willingness to force-quit destructive or futile and therefore valueless reaction, and await the reboot of the movement of Consciousness. This may take active willingness against past programming routines, but to release a coercively conflicted mentality is to calm into a subtler awareness and corresponding perspective. There is no way to yield to one's being strategically, yet the phrase is simply a self-honesty that no longer animates strategies of defence against one's own fear or indeed one's own inner knowings that are often hidden within fears.
In a sense everything is a matter of perspective, but when we lose it, we lock ourselves into very tight and dense compulsive knots. I have every confidence in our innate capacity to imagine and create a world in which we can uncover and explore what really impassions and enthuses us in ways that actually enrich each other rather than fight ourselves and therefore each other.
The key is what truly moves us. If we are moving from what does not in fact resonate with our life, we are following the wrong urge. A key in this is to recognize the difference between aspiring to a goal and trying not to fail. Abundance does not grow from the attempt to not lose - excepting of course an abundance of fear and lack!
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Bring on the empty Horses!
Labour needs to explain why Birmingham failed to stop the Islamist practices in the schools under its control
No more Trojan horses
Be aware that when those in positions of power and trust say "do as I say and not as I do", that they will send conflicted messages that undermine their own integrity and authority as well as teaching others that it is ok or even necessary to use coercive propaganda in place of a willingness to communicate.
As long as the 'parent' or leadership persists in its own fearful denial of its own confusion, it locks itself in a mask that is attempted to co-opt others to validate its own false sense of identity.
The dissonance of reaction and miscommunication that seems to call for even further coercive and deceptive 'control' is in fact the opportunity to awaken from a strategy that not only cannot work - but which further undermines all that yet IS working.
Human Existence without integrity and trust is bedlam. One can act out such confusion as if it makes sense and thus give your Life to that which neither knows or values you.
The urge to self-protection is easily used by the boy who cries 'wolf!' to divert it. But in time the trick is revealed and nothing the boy says thereafter is accorded credibility.
Be aware the mind is very cunning in its role as the justifier of your mask or persona and consider if saving face is in fact a saving grace or a deeper and denser and more costly set of lies. The ancient wisdom knew of this but expressed it in symbol and story - which a scientifically minded materialism rejects or ignores.
No one can tell you anything that you do not yourself choose to accept as true. You are the one who can discern what is truly resonant and relevant to your best sense of who and what you are now. When we believe fearfully, we are prone to want to hide our 'nakedness' and the voice of a self-serving suggestion will rise to our desire to NOT know what we fear we have become. Behold the deceiver is in our midst because a cover-up of a covert op regards exerting power as more desirable than accepting relationship in which true communication can enter and restore - step by step - a shared integrity of being to our awareness.
The blame game is the worship of a false god. There are many attributes of the term 'god', and one of them is foundation. Another is authority to which one gives trust and identifies within. A so called godless rationality is simply an illusion of a Pinochio-like puppet, rebelling against its condition as a device of extending a higher or greater Conscious appreciation into a scripted world of props and personae. But IT has no independent existence what-so-ever. Any IDEA that we call upon or accept as our own will define and dictate all that extends FROM such foundation. Ideas of a unified and integrated nature share on the gift of Life. The thinking that seems to run off apart from Life as if to be a power all unto itself is a trick of the mind that generates experience unlike our true nature - hence the fear and guilt that then gives rise to a world of competing powers seeking to control 'others' seen as enemy, slave or temporary ally.
There is almost always something in the communication or reflection of the 'enemy' or the 'other' that carries the opportunity for healing - IF we listen not in our strategic dictates - but in the peace of a listening heart. It really does come down to a choice as to where one turns for guidance. As long as the spell endures, one believes one cannot afford to open to anything that is not already 'on our side' and yet who is the caster of the spell but your own wish?
When 'worlds collide' the call is to open to a fresh cultural perspective. The old goats may persist in butting each other or butting in. But fear IS being exposed for what it is - and no longer can be hidden where and in ways it is NOT. Dumping fear or toxic debt onto externals so as to protect an elitist segregating mentality is not our 'salvation' - though of course one can choose to believe oneself specially endowed or afflicted and play out that experience upon others if they will have you.
One is free to imagine oneself creatively or otherwise - but one cannot uncreate one's nature AS creative - no matter how earnestly or self-righteously one seeks to validate one's persona as if IT were the creative. Identity confusion can only operate in a darkened room, in secret. Until one observes and understands the device by which we 'live' in separated secret minds that join only to protect and preserve separateness, the consciousness 'knows not what it does' for it takes reflections as real and forgets its true nature in struggle with the mirrored world.
One cant make a horse drink the water but one can drink thereof as a living example. Only them will one's word be 'Do as I do' - if you will, rather than 'do as I say, not as I do'. What you give out is what you get back. Honesty is a congruency and consistency of thought, word, act and experience. Pretending to be 'decent, respectable, caring, protective and empowering of others' is part of the wishfulness that serves to hide deeper fears or shames.
The illusion of powerlessness is perhaps man's greatest 'achievement'. You ALWAYS have and are a choice. But to know this, one has to turn away from falsely framed choices whose primary purpose is to keep you in the dark. It doesn't hold to blame governments for our own choices and their results - or to expect them to represent a conscious integrity that is not already sharing itself in the collective level of our communication. It is no use saying to those in positions of trust and leadership, "do as I say and not as I do".
Tuesday, 8 July 2014
Leadership
Leadership is servership. In any given situation people take initiatives that serve the need of the situation rather than just their own gratifications. This quality is lost when leadership is equated with personal status.
Leadership embodies qualities of a true willingness to listen and stands clear in the decisions and actions that arise from a genuine communication.
Leaders get out of the way as much as possible so as not to interfere with the free movement of initiative within their respective influence.
Leaders know they are not a power unto themselves. They are learners on an equal basis - operating temporarily in a particular role.
That was just some ideas of what qualifies true leadership in my view.
In such times as we live there is much fear and polarised reaction, and consequently little willingness for genuine communication. So many are defined by what they believe is wrong and must be fought.
There are two directions that serve humanity truly. One is a process of education by which we become aware of choices we make that undermine, sabotage or deny our own good and the other is to wholly embrace the beloved - the Good that is tangibly and obviously Good. Fear distracts from joy in life and the mind is activated in reaction so as to put 'Life' on hold until the emergency is passed. In a state of perpetual emergency, Life does not get a word in edgeways.
Life has everything to say if we let it in and listen - but all the devices by which we think we can 'go it alone' - operating on our own thinking - without really checking in at the heart - is exactly the kind of 'leadership' that goes nowhere and costs everything!
The child is paternally protected and guided until it can begin to also hold the values of the culture. It is not free to be a child forever but must grow responsibility. This principle is Life-affirming. If the parent loses the cultural values that enliven it - they drift into patterns that distort their guardianship so as to become guards. If the same distortions affect the adolescent, they interpret love as coercive and redefine their freedom in reaction. The 'parent' that manages, feeds and protects a distorted culture of perpetual adolescence and childish irresponsibility may see itself in a world that would become even more chaotic if it were to withdraw its control - or if any other parenting idea was to usurp it from its sense of power.
That was a quick sketch - but the principle of restating and embodying the true and tangible values that enliven our culture is one of truing up and coming out of the closet as an example of the culture rather than an attacker of what is perceived to be the evil in another. From a true integrity, one can communicate issues without becoming baited in the personality level of mask, deceits and addiction to false presentation. ANYONE of any station who extends such an active willingness is answering the NEED of our situation and embodying leadership.
Every idealism becomes subverted to deceit because Life is not a system - so much as a dance. One has to move with the music - and this means listening. Belief systems will tend to replace listening and seeing. Belief systems tend to be coercive upon the consciousness that gives trust and power to them. This is the politic of freedom I invite; of responsibility as consciousness for what we choose to accept as true of our own self - and thus to act only from that - whilst extending the same trust to others in their own choices and being willing to communicate honestly where we meet or share purpose.
Leadership embodies qualities of a true willingness to listen and stands clear in the decisions and actions that arise from a genuine communication.
Leaders get out of the way as much as possible so as not to interfere with the free movement of initiative within their respective influence.
Leaders know they are not a power unto themselves. They are learners on an equal basis - operating temporarily in a particular role.
That was just some ideas of what qualifies true leadership in my view.
In such times as we live there is much fear and polarised reaction, and consequently little willingness for genuine communication. So many are defined by what they believe is wrong and must be fought.
There are two directions that serve humanity truly. One is a process of education by which we become aware of choices we make that undermine, sabotage or deny our own good and the other is to wholly embrace the beloved - the Good that is tangibly and obviously Good. Fear distracts from joy in life and the mind is activated in reaction so as to put 'Life' on hold until the emergency is passed. In a state of perpetual emergency, Life does not get a word in edgeways.
Life has everything to say if we let it in and listen - but all the devices by which we think we can 'go it alone' - operating on our own thinking - without really checking in at the heart - is exactly the kind of 'leadership' that goes nowhere and costs everything!
The child is paternally protected and guided until it can begin to also hold the values of the culture. It is not free to be a child forever but must grow responsibility. This principle is Life-affirming. If the parent loses the cultural values that enliven it - they drift into patterns that distort their guardianship so as to become guards. If the same distortions affect the adolescent, they interpret love as coercive and redefine their freedom in reaction. The 'parent' that manages, feeds and protects a distorted culture of perpetual adolescence and childish irresponsibility may see itself in a world that would become even more chaotic if it were to withdraw its control - or if any other parenting idea was to usurp it from its sense of power.
That was a quick sketch - but the principle of restating and embodying the true and tangible values that enliven our culture is one of truing up and coming out of the closet as an example of the culture rather than an attacker of what is perceived to be the evil in another. From a true integrity, one can communicate issues without becoming baited in the personality level of mask, deceits and addiction to false presentation. ANYONE of any station who extends such an active willingness is answering the NEED of our situation and embodying leadership.
Every idealism becomes subverted to deceit because Life is not a system - so much as a dance. One has to move with the music - and this means listening. Belief systems will tend to replace listening and seeing. Belief systems tend to be coercive upon the consciousness that gives trust and power to them. This is the politic of freedom I invite; of responsibility as consciousness for what we choose to accept as true of our own self - and thus to act only from that - whilst extending the same trust to others in their own choices and being willing to communicate honestly where we meet or share purpose.
Reflecting the choices that ARE being made is different from attacking them. It allows joining with the one who is making a poor choice so as to serve their ability to make a better one - once the issue is opened to the light. Those who freely deny their freedom do not realise such a choice while they see their limitation arising from their failed expectations of others or of the world 'out there'.
This was written into an article:
Misguided Beliefs in Political Leaders
http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/35457/Richard-Ebeling-Misguided-Beliefs-in-Political-Leaders/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)