Apocalyptic Deceit

in reply to

https://www.technocracy.news/climate-contrarian-uncovers-big-scientific-error-upends-major-ocean-warming-study/

Just a note to the framing of the article.

I invite and suggest being vigilant against propagating the information in the framework of reference asserted as consensual (sic) climate science.

Our attempts to study weather, climate, and cosmological context are ALL in infancy and predominantly expressing the accepted MODEL - as in filling in the gaps rather than challenging belief or dogma masking as fact.

Part of this 'false inheritance' is to stand on the shoulders of giant MISTAKES or 'wrong turnings' that become so fundamental to all invested identity of resource and reputation as to become 'ossified' or effectively put beyond question or officially supported or allowed discussion.You know where the 'power' is by what we are not able to openly discuss or speak to without fear of penalty and exclusion. But this is in fact where fear gives power away TO - whether knowingly or in unconscious recognition of the structural nature of funding, career and security.

So while people recognise 'climate contrarian' they are also invited into a polarised framework of identifications - that works to divide and rule out genuine communication.

Now it may be that the 'ruling elites' believe there is no way to communicate to those who do not share their worldview and so PR and the psyop replace the idea of democratic accountability, and replace the voice of the individual with quantified systemic data or frameworks of value relative to the 'ideals' of control and possession of all means of control.

It can so easily be obvious that the USE of apparently scientific data models is political and manipulative - indeed coercive. As such it qualifies as a psyop in intent whatever the apparent content being flagged up for threat and alarm. To immediately react to the assertions is to miss the baited trap - becausehaving reacted, we have in effect suffered a stolen identity by being phished.

Insofar as I consider Earth's always changing climate, or the desecration and despoiling of our living environment, I see the MEANINGS we give to change effect the archetypes we then re-enact or recycle through the ages.

But the core issue that I remain vigilant against is that of deceit - through the vector of our own self-illusion. For when ancient or primitive fears are invoked, the response that is triggered is blind and blinding.

In exactly the same way the 'primitive brain' or sympathetic response operates the contraction and shut down or subordination of all but immediate physical pathways in fight or flight and it is as if this 'response' is running autonomously as a past that must never be revisited or revisioned - and so re-enacts its pattern of denial and projected hate and fear in attacking its OWN shadow in everything.

Our catastrophic past (not the narrative of millions of years of uniform gradualism) has 'structured our consciousness through which we perceive and experience a self and world and brother as estranged, other and unlike. the 'territory' of our 'under-current denials' is what our surface mind was invoked to rule out. And so I CANNOT talk to you there or reach you there because it is a ruling out or denial of direct relational communication.

However beneath the masking presentations of self and world is a living presence that is in a sense put on hold while dealing or dallying with the drama of a conflicted sense of self and world. I will meet you there because there is no 'where' else that true meeting or true 'with-ness' can arise or occur.

With the advent of a greater awareness comes the fear of invested illusion still clung to as true. That we are in some sense 'stuck' in negatively self reinforcing habit of belief, interpretation and response is simply evident, but every polarised faction 'sees' the problem in the 'other'.

The NEED is always to pause instead of emotionally react - ESPECIALLY in emergency. The asserting insistent insinuation that we MUST ACT NOW OR ELSE! is the manipulative intent to prevent reflection and communication, so that a reaction can be set off that is like a shaped charge. Such is the psyop or psychological weapon.

Once this has been seen in one field it can become a signature alert to all - EXCEPT where personal investment in our worldview insists in making an exceptionalism - a case where loveless and dishonest means serve an accepted and invested goal.

Our Choice is always between aligning in the embrace and extension of Life - or the alignment in evading or avoiding the fear and pain of loss of life. the forms this takes are legion, but they asll sacrifice a truly shared appreciation now, for a future that never comes, begotten of a past that never TRULY was AS WE INTERPRET NOW. For while conditions may occur, our response to them is the creation or generation of meanings.

'Inherited and acquired fears' map out a world of conflicted insanity management Inc.

A truly current or present appreciation is the gift of releasing allegiance and identity from old patterns that no longer serve or fit who we now recognise and accept ourselves to be.

Conflict management Inc has to induce and insinuate conflict within your mind to operate through you.

Thanks - but no thanks!

There is a Peace of unconflicted being to any who would pause and desist their mind-reactions enough to free the awareness of Noticing. When we notice our thought we are no longer running as a background app, and from perspective comes new choices. Here is where we need be vigilant against putting the new wine in the old bottle paradigm - else we are subverting the forms of our insight to serve and strengthen the mask. No blame in noticing. Self-honesty is a gift of our true Inherence. Why feed it as 'sacrifice' to a god of guilt?

The Aztec regarded their race as 'chosen' in terms of engaging war by which to gather and effect the sacrifices that forfended the end of the 'Sun' or Age. The same pattern takes different forms - both collectively and individually. True worth-ship is shared to the glory of the Source and Nature of our being. True with-ness is receptive to the truth under all conditions instead of spinning off into a conditional 'love' of possession that of course dispossesses us. But the nature of a true alignment is the release of obstacles and not the struggle to eradicate symptoms while persisting the cause.

The weather, the oceanic currents and indeed earthquake and vulcanism are all in essence the result of electrical charge and discharge flux. This is true atomically, as it is in our Solar system, and through the Galactic to the Universal - and in our biology - as in our consciousness. But a compartmentalised denial of consciousness operates as if separate parts can operate separate and conflicting realities. This can then be used as a tool of limitation and doing so persistently becomes identifying in the tool as the determiner or framework of perceived meanings.

Computer modelling variable inputs to arrive at the result that attains funding and reputational status is a no brainer - or rather requires looking for the support of the projected model. Quite apart from the theory of Greenhouse 'gases' as the driver of radiant energy. Perhaps nanoparticulates in our atmosphere might yet come to the rescue of the theory - so as to justify the political shift to an Internment of Things under global and granular energy controls? An end to war? At cost of an end to Consciousness and life. Devolving to an unconsciousness is not an answer to unresolved conflict - but if given devotion, can obliterate all responsibility so as to merely live in the scream that cannot even find a voice - and accept this as the Way Things Are.

A mind trap of ingenious deceit until we choose NOT to persist it

in reply to

https://off-guardian.org/2019/07/11/hypocrisy-taints-uks-media-freedom-conference/


We have choice as to whether to persist in a 'thinking' identification, or instead to watch or notice such 'thoughts'.

In the first, the thinking generates a corresponding 'reality' experience of filters and rules of a narrative identity, that operate a persistence of a sense of possession and control. As if inside our own thinking or model.

In the second, the attention shifts from 'within the definitions' of currently running thought to the coherence and congruency of its experience relative to who we now accept ourselves to be in relation to others and world.

The second is of course simply  a moment of introspection or self honesty that may be delayed, evaded or defended against by  frameworks and processes of thinking that operate ways to re-assert, persist in or sustain such thinking OVER the dissonance that rises AS the symptom of conflicted premise and misalignments in ways that persist the original error of taking or being taken in by the self-image in place of a relational extension, reflection and sharing in the qualities of being.

Such that for self-illusion to 'live' prevail or survive, truth - of a resonance within wholeness of being - must 'die' or be denied.

There are tipping points as to our capacity to maintain an upside down thought system relative to a true inherence, and yet the ingenuity of mind-in-thinking is the ability to accuse or flag and attack its own conflicts in 'others' as a distribution of fear, guilt and negative consequence away from self under illusion of power by which to sustain and validate a false identity in 'righteous' attack in the name of security or defence.

I write to you the reader as an expression of the true power of choice - because while we project the cause of our dissonance out and away from our self, we make ourselves powerless to change it and compelled to hate, deny and defend against the 'other' who is charged with all the 'meanings' we cast out or indeed cast them in.

The incapacity or refusal to look at our own thought is sustained or supported by fear, guilt and pain of loss. All of which can be seen as a mind trap of ingenious deceit until we choose NOT to persist in a tyrannous and reactive thinking of false promise AND premise, and in pausing, open a space of NOTICING directly. This willingness to listen - rather than shout into our own cave grows a reintegrative consciousness as a continuity of a shifted or awakened recognition of coherency. One step at a time.

Freedom talked about without embodiment, is a parody acted out and be-lived - and that is the nature of an attempt to make life in our own image. Hollowed out and grotesque caricatures given power of worth-ship and with-ness. A false currency is not truly Current - but is passing off as a presentation by which to cover over or distort a true currency of worth and with-ness or relation for a private or hidden agenda - at cost of the whole.

When we are taken in and taken over by false thinking, we are as 'one who knows not what they do'. Reflecting the nature of the thinking and the choice being made is not the attacking of our own 'sins' in another. The ingenuity of the thinking mind is  worked through division, unconsciousness and diversion or displacing dissociation. The truly creative is the extension of wholeness - not the projection of hidden self-denials as if 'outsourcing pain of consequence' can in fact serve anything but the 'sustainability' of a self-deceit or 'mind-capture'.

When symptoms usurp and besiege us, we are in 'thinking' that is running as if reality itself and our investments keep us in a framework of threat, struggle and reaction. Looking within directly as the grace of noticing - is not a process requiring time - but we may find ways that help to pause or desist or disengage from  restless reactive identification. We may then notice all kinds of resistance or evasion to seeing - but this also can be noticed instead of identified against or blamed.

Addicts may wake as the release and walking out of a false sense of self-lack, but the undoing of any learned habit is the growing of new behavioural expression of active willingness in persistent and consistent choice that arises from and is sustained by the recognition of wholeness that is always within the release of a false identification.

Where we choose to seek guidance, direction and support is our ongoing or current acceptance. 'Checking in' with the heart is not emotional appeal or manipulative distortion, but a transparency and account to self-honesty that THINKING would usurp. How to tell the difference? WANT to know the difference! The wish to have truth be in your own image is the willingness NOT to look at what doesn't fit or support your current belief or definition. Thus the MORE of who you are is denied you under the attempt to effect a self-inflation or aggrandisement set against the lack and loss or unworthiness and invalidation of others.

If you want the freedom to uncover and share in true awareness, you have to give that purpose to have it. Split purpose operates a bubble reality awareness set against rejected or denied self.