https://www.anhinternational.org/news/from-pandemic-to-pandemic-of-variants/
The virus as a model for diagnosing and treating disease is not millions of years old. but a little over a century and even in this passing through very different stages.
But while a belief wags the mind that think it, the ability to question it - or even a willingness to do so, may be impossible because of the cultural and corporate invested identity in its story, as a bulwark to its parentage of scientific enlightenment or rather the assertion of such without the basis of creative integrity endeavour that soon concretised to a marketisable and weaponisable technologism.
The same criticism can be levelled at gene theory. That it 'hit a wall' when it didn't work as planned led to a re-route to cancer therapy and then as the 'vaccine' 2.0 against endemic respiratory seasonality framed as novel, virulent and deadly in a bought Media if not in Gov small print. The genetic fiasco can yet be saved by setting a novel variant of its story as the basis for social control - which is needed to protect a lie by which vast losses and toxic consequence is to be pharmed out to the population so as to protect the shareholders in Corruption Incorporated.
Bossche seeks to anchor the biotech in service of 'immunity' as his core payload.
The actual payload of the biotech injections that goes far beyond adverse issues of synthetic proteins is that of nanoparticulates supposedly used as adjuvant and to help 'transport or deliver' across protective barriers that otherwise limit drugs in the body/brain, but offering a range of surveillance and control technologies. Graphene oxide is a particular case as it becomes highly magnetic in biological context.
The nature of deceit is ingenuity that masks within masks to protect a core investment. Establishment thinking CANNOT question the basis of its own survival and security. But a willingness to establish what is true MUST recognise and release such identities that are otherwise covert to the mask of a paramount concern in surviving threat to self-as-currently defined, accepted and asserted or fronted out.
I am in and of the Spirit of life that cannot be marketised, weaponised and made identity of without exchanging felt truth for narrative leverage and bias of 'augmented reality'. Just because Bossche offers opposition to the Bad Cop of an inhuman agenda does not mean I am more disposed to believe what the Good Cop says. Ingenuity of forward panning will hedge all bets and use our minds and emotions to find the means to get us to consent to eat the repackaged sin rather than detoxify to a truly felt connection and balance of heart and mind in Life. But it does so as a blind survival drive in the terms it has set.
The meanings I give and receive are in Life, not under fear's compulsion, drive or tyranny.
I look to what serves the whole - that of course is one with the truth of my own participation.
