Isolation ad absurdum?

Accept a part of an opponents argument but then extend it to extremes such as to effectively render it impractical, useless or unusable?

 

http://viroliegy.com/2022/08/08/rabies-the-virus-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-5082

Nike: It is more than obvious that so-called viruses have never been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally either in decaying tissues or outside the living organism. But neither the so-called proteins together with their components nor the so-called nucleotides with their components have ever been isolated, purified and visualized three-dimensionally. And yet, including Lanka, Cowan and Kaufman still blindly believe in the existence of amino acids, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, nucleotides and DNA chains.

 

Are you taking the isolation argument to extremes that become defacto absurd?

My response is not to you personally but to the themes that I pick up on when I read you.

That our mental modelling in image, concept and word, finds a resonant match with reality as we can behold it, is a mark of a language and identity of self-significance and relational honesty. For an image can never become the reality that it represents. That we identify in image set against reality is where we become identified in and by our tool. Mind as a freedom to self-reference runs a circular reinforcement of denial by mutual reinforcement of a signal set in filtered distortions, WANTED true.

I agree that the models of science are grossly simplified narratives that are further distorted by their sharing through media - including textbooks and training. Our psychic-emotional terrain shapes what can be said or what is expected to find support if being said. This is also structuring financial decisions. This then feeds a resonance loop.

The letter A has not been isolated because it shares lines and even angles with V? All lines are extensions of a point - so what is the point? The point is extended in infinite possibility of relations at and between all angles and dimensions. (Though letters & glyphs are essentially a 2D plane or screen of symbolic derivatives). The expression of one through many is the integrity of coherent expression or indeed the tensegrity of being. There is a sense in which the human imagination runs an in vitro exploration of isolation from living context, such as to set the Living Whole as 'dead' while taking dead letter of concepts set in symbol as 'survival' set over 'death'.

In doing this we always project our own denial out and away from self, such as to experience it at the hand of another. And by this, justify our self as attack, withholding and withdrawal, to a protected grievance or exclusion zone that is in blind relationship or entanglement relative to a point of mutually conflicting self interest, set against wholeness.

How much of our 'reality' is a fudge of 'continuity support' for a masking intent set into polarised reaction? Yet none of which can even seem to be - without an underlying Matrix of Communication of shared or common properties, qualities & characteristics.
Dissociation must first know a relationship to dissociate from or deny, so denials of truth really deny awareness of truth, as a mind of filters and rules seeking external support and reinforcement by which to justify not looking within the living moment, or movement of being.


 

Science Set in an Anti-Psychic 'Materialism'?

 This was posted to Dr Lidiya Angelova telegram channel

in response to:

"I am 100 % sure that is because they isolated not a virus but  extracellular vesicles which have that S protein affecting heart, and this is the reason which causes these sudden deaths."

If germ theory can be weaponised to run a global pharming of Human assets, why not gene dogma? Why not S-protein as sorcery set by 'expert' definitions made in dark lab where no independent science can bring light to reveal the false?
Are you 100% sure of destructive agenda & false flagging this to the mRNA psyop by which a species can be genetically 'damaged' so as to set in forever dependence of genetic controls against what the 'Bad and Mad' pharma did?
The nanotech and hydrogel intent is a huge suspect, but all science set in purely antipsychic 'materialism' will ignore the Creative.
Shocks that are lived experience express through the body.
Without prejudice, consider the GNM perspective of a psycho-physical expression.
This reveals a greater life from which we mask in fear, ignorance so to attack ourselves.
Consider the placebo is also the nocebo.
If you EXPECT s-protein poisoning to be made by your OWN cells as a walking time bomb waiting to be triggered - because EXPERTS SAY! - then you are giving power away from the heart of a true discernment. That an overwhelm can break or stop the heart is obvious. That it can occur AFTER the conflict releases is less so.
That self-disgust, shame or self-dirtying can erupt pustules on the skin transcends the classifications of innumerable 'diseases' framed as transmissable.
That we are sympathetic beings of resonant communication and identity who can 'join in hate' as in 'sickness' as if to boost a sense of lack and disconnection has deep implications as does the alignment in current narratives for 'meaning', such as to want to be Covid and discard a cold.
Identy theft is 'being phished'!
Love identifies truly by its extension through us.
If we give a false word we teach, and learn, a false result. Socal masking distortions can thus become 'normal' while reality simply Is - but the mind has run away with itself.
The choice for unconsciousness as saving from conflict at the heart, is deepset, even to escape to sickness, madness and death. But only because it is protected from the light of a curiosity that can question our own thought, belief and framing definitions.