Showing posts with label revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revolution. Show all posts

Sunday, 29 November 2015

Exporting Revolution - a Policy of Terror



‘Exporting Revolution’: Zbigniew Brzezinski On Trial At The UN General Assembly
Though never mentioned by name, the shadow of the 87-year-old loomed large over the U.N. General Assembly, with the U.S. and its allies defending or glossing over his quiet strategy of destabilization and the rest of the world’s leaders decrying it as a “policy of terror.”
By Caleb T. Maupin


'Evil' is the shadow of an asserted self righteousness - that then locks onto the perceived evil OUTSIDE itself and attempts to control, deny, enslave or kill it.
It is not enough to see evil OUTSIDE and fight it - as if that in any way is not serving its own agenda under mask of righteousness.

The imprinted beliefs of a 'survivalist identity' amidst terror and threat operate without true consciousness - as if spun off in a private and disconnected sense of Life as THREAT.
The attraction of 'righteous' hating diverts from the embrace of the heart that is thus 'locked out' to a 'mind' that is trapped in, the feelings of hate.

The mind can and does elaborate justifications - justifictions, yes - but written in flesh as pain and loss. Heart and mind are one - and the split mindedness that denies Feeling, is the 'thinking' that is divorced from the very Movement of our being - from Life Itself.

I write to the choice NOT to listen to insane thinking - regardless its apparent justifications - and to Listen in the heart - even and especially when hurting in the hateful. For a greater Acceptance of 'That we are as we are' must precede the freedom to be as we, in truth prefer.

A control mentality is to be dismantled... while operating such check and balance as a fundamental integrity of communication moves in us to be.

S.M. Stirling replies to me:

Dude, life is a threat. It's so threatening that there is a 100% probability of it eventually killing you.

My response to S.M Stirling:

I could see what you wrote as: Life is certain death, but a temporary delay of the inevitable allows that thought to assert itself.
That thought is the belief of the fragmenting and fragmented self/mind.
However, you are free to believe it and HAVE the experience.

When the cuckoo's egg hatches, other chicks are pushed from the nest and the life support system is usurped that was their due.
Likewise when guilt and fear thinking is accepted into the mind it pushes your heart's knowing and true thoughts out and steals your identity - like a phishing attack or a trojan deceit.

Now a 'you' separate from 'life' sees life as a threat - a terror that will surely crush the 'life' out of 'you'.
I suggest there is much more to You that 'you' allows you to know and that life and death are very different from what the 'you' thinking dictates.

If your computer is compromised by security breach so as to become a tool of some agenda that is not your own true will - then clear out the false and re-establish a pristine original system - and maintain full vigilance against deceit.

In short, the definitions and core beliefs by which you identify and live - determine your life. For whatever conditions you meet or unfold as your life - they are those by which you are expressing your core beliefs as to who and what you are - and what the world is.

These are not 'materially fixed' - though they may be very heavily reinforced. Life is also a capacity to open NEW perspective. Whether there is the willingness and desire to Live is another thing - for the guilt-thinking works to block the awareness and feeling of LIFE - towards ensuring a false peace in a loss of capacity to feel and recognize LIFE - instead identifying with the parasitic thinking that kills its host and propagates itself thereby.

Everything changes. Nothing really 'survives' its own instant of appearance - yet there is ... beneath the ever changing, a tangible Spirit or Purpose that can be aligned with and awaken to recognize itself through Creation. The key is; "what you give out, is what you get back". As you are sowing so ARE you reaping. The fact that this does not SEEM true or obvious, is the result of a fragmented mind at war within itself - that "does not know what it does' because it is largely unconscious of its formative and interpretive belief.

Yes Life contains catalyst and challenge and a process of obstructions or adversities that may or may not be transformed or undone. If the ideas you are accepting as true are serving you - use them. Live by them. If they are not - have a clear out to make room for what does serve your joy in Life. And why not?



James Wherry Shelia Sperbeck commented to the main article

Why? Brezinski called it right, when he predicted the invasion of Afghanistan. He correctly organized opposition to it. As a college student in the 1980's, I did put up the posters of the "butterfly bombs" that the Soviets dropped on villages. They were bombs shaped like toys and pens that blew the hands off of children - and that was what they were intended for.

Brezinski's glaring failure underscores my contempt for the Far Left: like all of the other anti-war protesters, he mindlessly turned his back on Vietnam and ignored the human rights abuses that the hate groups who make up the peace movement PROMISED us they would continue to fight against. Har, har, har. Under their watch, 3 million human beings were murdered in the Killing Fields of Cambodia. The only thing comparable was the Rwanda genocide under Bill Clinton.


I felt this response:

The 'opposition' pre dated the  Russian invasion - and was designed to lure USSR into their own 'Vietnam'. I thought the death and destruction (and profit thereby), were the intended outcomes of such policy - under guise of this-ism v that-ism.

However, any information or appearance is itself potentially carrying or promoting hidden agenda. The idea of passing off as something else in order to undermine or prevail over is deeply embedded in human consciousness. It used to be called 'the deceiver'. Now it may be called spin, PR or part of full spectrum dominance. That is to control thinking, perception and reaction of the minds of 'others'. I have heard that you cant cheat an honest man - though he may be thankful for the revealing of any residual liability by which he could be triggered. What is honesty here but a congruency of thought, word and deed.

Clever thinking may promise much, but there is also the saying what goes around, comes around - and as you sow, so shall you reap. I don't say these AT you as if you should take them on from me - but with you in willingness to stay awake amidst the liability of being scammed - perhaps by a false sense of ourself that 'others' take advantage of.


Friday, 24 October 2014

Science as rebellion?

The Institute of Art and Ideas - offers a rich and exciting willingness to question, to revisit or revise our ideas and our world with new perspectives.

Science is Rebellion
Our knowledge, like the Earth, floats in nothingness, but this does not make it meaningless, says pioneering quantum physicist Carlo Rovelli; it actually makes it more precious.

- - -

Blessed are those whose intuitive faith challenges their experience, because our experience is a constructed reality of belief and definition, accepted true.

Believing is seeing, but of course what one says one believes is belied by one's actual experience and the inevitable reactions that automatically follow on from whatever interpretation IS currently operating.

The underlying 'revolution' is a separation device operating in consciousness whereby a mind seems to have become itself alone in conflict of identity and world in chaos that it takes as the basis to assume and assert power over itself and its world.

The intent to define and understand in this sense is an assertion of control imposed upon a natural order or relational unity that has been/is being temporarily disrupted by the separation device.

One can symbolize this and that's the way the older approaches to knowledge operate, in symbols that used archetypes to story the reflection of consciousness itself - that increasingly became disconnected from original context and became used more as modus of social control.

The reversal operates such that we become defined by our own conditioning, that is like saying we believe our own lies or fall under the spell of our own Word.

So it is appropriate that what seemed to 'get us locked into' limitation, conflict, and a disconnected sense that attempts to use its externally mapped world of others to 'fix or resolve or work out' its own 'salvation', validation, or however it so defines itself justified or complete.

Curiosity and imagination can be used to question the basis of our 'self' and its corresponding 'reality'. For not only is there no separate 'god' acting upon or coercing a Living Universe/Multiverse into existence, there is likewise no separate 'self'.

The layer or level of mind is but one facet and itself operates many levels at once - unconscious, so-called conscious, and superconscious - and we generally assert our surface consciousness to be ON TOP rather than notice it screens a selective focus of possibility from a vast range of probability of a truly infinite range of potential.

Human 'reality' is in some sense like a sandcastle upon an infinite beach - or a bubble in an infinite breaking wave - yet the power of the wave is in it, and the focus of the desire and intent that Life Know Itself guides, moves and supports it. For there IS no actual separation or disconnection from That which moves and gives form to the Formless. Nor can one use the vocabulary-ability of a separated self-sense to objectify or make coercive relation with it or under it.

Anything undertaken from the basis of a dis-integrating movement brings the reinforcement of a dis-integrated self and world; a self in pieces. Humpty the broken cosmic egg-o.

So yes; the willingness to accept that we do not KNOW operates to allow the Knowing that is the Communication of the Whole as the Part, and through the Part in communication extended and relationship embraced. The nature of Reality that is unchangeable is that existence is; and that the one is the all and the all are the one, and that what one puts out is what one gets back.

Such is Creation - not of a separate and separating 'god' but in God of God and as God - for That which Is is, but how you - as an integral expression of All That Is - choose to experience existence, is through the sharing of and in and as Idea. No way of experiencing - or rather - of being the gift-communication of experience itself is in itself more or less valid that any or instant or facet of Creation - not least because nothing is in and of itself alone and apart to be so judged. But what is or is not relevant and resonant to YOUR core signature vibration of focusing desire and exploration is natural to disregard in the creative unfolding of the revelation of ever novel ways to experience and relate and feel and know.

All 'self's' operate against their own Good when they are defined in misalignment with their true desire. Protecting the joyless by sacrificing one's joy is absurd seen in the clear. But the mind protects against being seen in the clear for fear of loss and of change of pain and loss, by which it has conditioned itself to survive against.

Coming back into alignment is also the uncovering of a greater clarity of purpose, of vision and of a more integral meaning from which to live and be. It is our natural inheritance from a prodigal exercise within 'as if' - for Source remains Is - and you Know "I am" as your own Indivisibility of being - regardless that the mind can play divide and rule upon its own models. 'What' anything is and how you choose to relate to it be seem to be conditioned and determined by a universe of cause and effect - but any of this can be challenged back to uncover its roots in the Word or definition/belief we put out - in the understanding that the collective agreements constitute a structure of experiencing that like a classroom, is not an authority to overthrow or a prison to break down - so much as a living framework of opportunity for teaching and learning in rich reflection and shared appreciation.

The mind of revolution/evolution can fade to the appreciation of mind as servant and instrument of truly creative freedom shared. It really is a matter of 'where we are coming from' rather than where we believe we have been and thus are conditioned to repeat round and round in revolving whilst ever struggling to evolve within such self conflicted futility.

Science is a valid exploration within the willingness to uncover truth. But without the love of truth there can only be assertions, coercions and war to establish the version that serves whatever it is that one is choosing to love INSTEAD. Consciousness is inherently responsible in the clear for it sees that it does unto itself. Questioning a version of consciousness that refuses to pause and open to revisit its foundations is not an act of war but of love, though not at first recognized such in a mind that believes division and control as the condition on which its own existence depends.