My theme came through a string of events including this posting on the generation of fake news to promote and support war on Syria.
But as with most of my writing - I address what I feel to be beneath the specific events and perceptions.
What if awakening in truth is a state in which no one else can hear you?
The mind that is made for the purpose of hiding feared truth cannot altogether succeed in blanking or denying its own predicated sense of self - and so the lie and the father of the lie operate the substitution for truth - assigning the pain of dissonance to the 'enemy'.
What is at stake if the lack of validity for the beliefs we founded upon are revealed false?
If what seemed true becomes just a mask under which to fight or delay the revealing of hated or feared truth - then hollow shell shouts a narrative control that has only fear's leverage to maintain it.
The fear or belief that the 'enemy' is using every kind of treachery and deceit triggers the reaction in like kind.
The use of 'enemy' whether real or imagined - is the diversion of free awareness to polarised reaction - IF the enemy can be presented in a dangerous enough or outrageous enough framing.
Willingness to let truth in is key. Truth has no place in war or conflicting sides - but without it we are under the tyranny of lies - so whatever else is going on - look to whether your mind is captured in reaction - or free to see what is here to see - and not just as the mind (in reaction) frames it.
I posit this possibility: that the revealing of the world of lies is not really about the world - but about the mind that predicates itself in definitions, beliefs and defences. And that the mind is never in fact a separated persona - but a complex of entangled personae - under a Script that is invisible - excepting the sense of exclusion thinks to see the enemy here! - now there! - now in that one!
As we do - so are we done by - so look to the persona-judgements of rejection, exclusion and invalidation - for this - as I see it - sets the framing or value set - for our perception and interpretation of others.
Insanity - is it a hateful evil to stamp out, eradicate and cast out all who are tainted? Or is it a mind-capture locked in reaction of its own attempt to 'stamp out, eradicate and cast out all who are tainted?'.
The insane run the world (in political terms) insanely - under some sense of exclusive polarized identity - set against others who do not meet specific criteria. While the idea of hating feeding the hateful with energy or fuel upon which to run has merit - the underlying beliefs are ideas that have been accepted, charged with (conflicted) meanings and are being lived out at cost or willing sacrifice of our reality.
The polarized identity is 'with us or against us' and so nothing gets through except and unless it registers as some service to the war.
The world often reminds me of a crazed gunman with hostages who is perceiving everything through the dissociated lens of their own core sense of suffering betrayal in extremity of pain and rage that runs both hot and cold. Except the only one (in political terms) - perhaps - talking 'down' the madman is Putin - insofar as a channel of communication can be established. Non-violent communication ought to be simply 'communication' and propaganda, spin, deceit and false framing could be called out and either corrected - or at least not responded to in its framing - and not adopted in retaliation. This does not rule out force - but it does rule out coercive deceits of coded threats.
If insanity is to replace us entirely - then there will be no consciousness by which to know the difference. While ultimately, I hold that we cannot change or edit our TRUE Cause - I see that we can cover over and act from the false as if it is true - and adapt to the pain of such a choice in ever more fragmented degradations of our capacity to feel and know and love and share the true.
Job had a hard time coming through, but the personification of a 'love of form' lost the wager. Are we in 'end times' or birth pains?
Wednesday, 14 June 2017
Monday, 12 June 2017
Living in an unreal world
Living in an Unreal World A Film By Adam Curtis
Maybe its because what we used to believe open was unknowingly structured to believe itself so.
I feel the 'don't know mind' is the willingness to release everything to a fresh willingness to uncover. The range of difficulty - running to refusal and defiance - is the attachment of what we WANT to be true. Some illusions thus seem more true than others.
If 'truth' is made something to fight over, then we are fighting over a copy, substitution, image or idol.
I don't know anything about the 'vice' issues - but if this is a 'vice' edit - I'm curious to see the original.
- - -
We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
Good quote but I feel to expand it.
The 'we' that can ignore, cover over or divert from true, is the joining in the focusing upon and in the framing of what is not true - such as our image or model of reality - AS if reality itself. (Our image of self in relation to everything is a narrative within symbols that point to territory prior to or more directly intimate than mapping forms).
The consequence of unreality asserted upon and within our mind is dissonance, as in the Soviet joke (below), there are different strategies to make a dead concept seem to live - that we could all recognize as the stick of terror, the carrot of 'protection' and the sacrifice of life to a living death.
We can be really or truly moved as an expression of our being and we can posit a sense of rules and control after the fact that we never had - as a narrative overlay to which reality then 'has to conform to' or be denied, subverted and redefined or re-framed to support a sense of personal power over life - with all the sense of fear, guilt and evil that is implicit in imposing a coercion of wish masking over denied will.
The term 'unconscious' can mean what you don't need to know to be the movement of being in expression. But it can also mean what you refuse and are afraid to know and push down or deny awareness. Denied awareness is denied reality and in old terms the 'wages of sin is death'.
A dead life walking is a loss of consciousness for what seems to be a power and protection - but reveals itself as the mask of guilt falls away to be a mistake calling for correction - ie: stop actively ignoring reality and let truth in - as the desire for true foundation in place of conflicted 'realities'.
Ref:
- - -
It offers an example of how controversy ABOUT something diverts from what it is. The divide and rule operates as divide and rule out (the true of love's awareness).
The unreal world is 'made real' by conflict of identities or personae in a script that plays for keeps - and defends against exposure in truth - excepting only as filtered forms used to support its narrative.
While this 'self' runs - it operates a mutually reinforcing reality of polarised 'otherness' - for it is the 'othering' or disowning of the whole in partiality to this or that FORM of an experience idolized and accepted IN PLACE of the movement of being - that cannot be FELT and truly known from within the 'mind-in-spin' for that is the nature of a wishing ; to put aside what is, by attending to something else. But note - there is nothing outside Is - but that you give it such a framing - and are thereby framed.
Another comment to what gets posted; being stirred at a deeper level does not always react, so much as take in and integrate.
If we are living in an unreal world - then that discovery invalidates the experience. So where do you REALLY live and what is REALLY living?
Or who then are You?
If the reflection and recognition of truth awakens in place of the lie and the father of the lie - then is a witness shared to the real world - not that reality CAN be concretised or defined in the forms of its visibility and tangibility - but that the reality we give and receive aligns true with who we feel and know ourselves to be. But the assertion of identity in conflict operates to 'put together again' from a false flagged attack - or a false sense of self gotten from a sense of limitation and loss.
The normalisation of a lie seems sane - and the opening to true seems weird.
Abiding the true means passing through the 'defences' against knowing the feared truth. But truth framed in fear - is not the truth - but a reversal of true.
'everything is backwards...'
- - -
After watching the video...
I don't see the shopping malls as more than the church where production slaves (in parts of the world where they have little worth and no voice) are sacrificed to feed consumption slaves (in parts of the world that peddle illusion of worth and an illusion of a voice). So I don't accept the real 'hard work' is in Malls but that we consent to be worked in allegiance to the thinking that splits, compartmentalizes and justifies 'getting' at another's expense.
Jesus said "Resist ye not evil".
Fear must misinterpret this as being a doormat for evil to stamp on.
Yet that boot stamping on a face (Orwell's image of the crucifiction) is the outcome of fear-driven identity or the struggle for power that winds up the action in chain reaction to wind up into a paralysis of the consciousness - a living death.
By their fruits you know them.
What you resist - persists. (As the definer of your identity set over and against)
The wish and belief that evil be given focus OUTSIDE you is the hiding of a correspondence in causality that becomes a back-door behind the front face.
True responsibility is your current recognition of your freedom to interpret and respond in alignment with who you are. you cannot change what you don't own. Terror and deceit seem to operate power over the mind - while it aligns in a like wish to operate power over being.
The way to open a place for creative change begins with pausing and desisting from the persistence in reactive change. Cognitive dissonance is not a blame tag but a simple correctable observation when we recognize it working in ourselves rather than point out the errors of others in terms of of intentions we also share in some form - or we would not be able to even perceive them.
Nothing (really) changes when we seek to blame (and change) the symptoms AS IF they are cause. For by ignoring cause - is the ONLY true creative principle excluded.
Nothing CAN change when a lock against change operates an illusion of change - and illusion that requires ongoing fragmentation of consciousness to pass off as believable - or keep its insane premise hidden.
Commenter:
Keeping an open mind is not as easy as it used to be.
Maybe its because what we used to believe open was unknowingly structured to believe itself so.
I feel the 'don't know mind' is the willingness to release everything to a fresh willingness to uncover. The range of difficulty - running to refusal and defiance - is the attachment of what we WANT to be true. Some illusions thus seem more true than others.
If 'truth' is made something to fight over, then we are fighting over a copy, substitution, image or idol.
I don't know anything about the 'vice' issues - but if this is a 'vice' edit - I'm curious to see the original.
- - -
We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
Good quote but I feel to expand it.
The 'we' that can ignore, cover over or divert from true, is the joining in the focusing upon and in the framing of what is not true - such as our image or model of reality - AS if reality itself. (Our image of self in relation to everything is a narrative within symbols that point to territory prior to or more directly intimate than mapping forms).
The consequence of unreality asserted upon and within our mind is dissonance, as in the Soviet joke (below), there are different strategies to make a dead concept seem to live - that we could all recognize as the stick of terror, the carrot of 'protection' and the sacrifice of life to a living death.
We can be really or truly moved as an expression of our being and we can posit a sense of rules and control after the fact that we never had - as a narrative overlay to which reality then 'has to conform to' or be denied, subverted and redefined or re-framed to support a sense of personal power over life - with all the sense of fear, guilt and evil that is implicit in imposing a coercion of wish masking over denied will.
The term 'unconscious' can mean what you don't need to know to be the movement of being in expression. But it can also mean what you refuse and are afraid to know and push down or deny awareness. Denied awareness is denied reality and in old terms the 'wages of sin is death'.
A dead life walking is a loss of consciousness for what seems to be a power and protection - but reveals itself as the mask of guilt falls away to be a mistake calling for correction - ie: stop actively ignoring reality and let truth in - as the desire for true foundation in place of conflicted 'realities'.
Ref:
Reminds me of that old Soviet joke: "Stalin, Khrushchev and Brezhnev are riding on the great train of communism together when it suddenly grinds to a halt. Stalin pokes his head out of the window and shouts, "Take the engineers behind the tool sheds and have them shot, then get new engineers!" But the train still does not move. Khrushchev has a go at it next. "Pardon the engineers, retrain them, then put them back to work!" But still the train does not move. Finally, after hours at complete standstill, Brezhnev turns to his fuming compatriots and says, "Gentlemen, let us simply close the blinds and pretend that we are moving!"
- - -
Commenter:
People on here seem more interested in who made the doc than the actual content! Weird!
It offers an example of how controversy ABOUT something diverts from what it is. The divide and rule operates as divide and rule out (the true of love's awareness).
The unreal world is 'made real' by conflict of identities or personae in a script that plays for keeps - and defends against exposure in truth - excepting only as filtered forms used to support its narrative.
While this 'self' runs - it operates a mutually reinforcing reality of polarised 'otherness' - for it is the 'othering' or disowning of the whole in partiality to this or that FORM of an experience idolized and accepted IN PLACE of the movement of being - that cannot be FELT and truly known from within the 'mind-in-spin' for that is the nature of a wishing ; to put aside what is, by attending to something else. But note - there is nothing outside Is - but that you give it such a framing - and are thereby framed.
Another comment to what gets posted; being stirred at a deeper level does not always react, so much as take in and integrate.
If we are living in an unreal world - then that discovery invalidates the experience. So where do you REALLY live and what is REALLY living?
Or who then are You?
If the reflection and recognition of truth awakens in place of the lie and the father of the lie - then is a witness shared to the real world - not that reality CAN be concretised or defined in the forms of its visibility and tangibility - but that the reality we give and receive aligns true with who we feel and know ourselves to be. But the assertion of identity in conflict operates to 'put together again' from a false flagged attack - or a false sense of self gotten from a sense of limitation and loss.
The normalisation of a lie seems sane - and the opening to true seems weird.
Abiding the true means passing through the 'defences' against knowing the feared truth. But truth framed in fear - is not the truth - but a reversal of true.
'everything is backwards...'
- - -
After watching the video...
I don't see the shopping malls as more than the church where production slaves (in parts of the world where they have little worth and no voice) are sacrificed to feed consumption slaves (in parts of the world that peddle illusion of worth and an illusion of a voice). So I don't accept the real 'hard work' is in Malls but that we consent to be worked in allegiance to the thinking that splits, compartmentalizes and justifies 'getting' at another's expense.
Jesus said "Resist ye not evil".
Fear must misinterpret this as being a doormat for evil to stamp on.
Yet that boot stamping on a face (Orwell's image of the crucifiction) is the outcome of fear-driven identity or the struggle for power that winds up the action in chain reaction to wind up into a paralysis of the consciousness - a living death.
By their fruits you know them.
What you resist - persists. (As the definer of your identity set over and against)
The wish and belief that evil be given focus OUTSIDE you is the hiding of a correspondence in causality that becomes a back-door behind the front face.
True responsibility is your current recognition of your freedom to interpret and respond in alignment with who you are. you cannot change what you don't own. Terror and deceit seem to operate power over the mind - while it aligns in a like wish to operate power over being.
The way to open a place for creative change begins with pausing and desisting from the persistence in reactive change. Cognitive dissonance is not a blame tag but a simple correctable observation when we recognize it working in ourselves rather than point out the errors of others in terms of of intentions we also share in some form - or we would not be able to even perceive them.
Nothing (really) changes when we seek to blame (and change) the symptoms AS IF they are cause. For by ignoring cause - is the ONLY true creative principle excluded.
Nothing CAN change when a lock against change operates an illusion of change - and illusion that requires ongoing fragmentation of consciousness to pass off as believable - or keep its insane premise hidden.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)