Do Ideas mutate the minds that host them?

Do Ideas Mutate the Mind that Hosts Them?

That Ideas goes forth to multiply (Is) Creation.
Garbage in; garbage out applies temporarily as freedom to mask conflicted thought in a fragmenting mutual self-reinforcement of private thought split off from integrality of being.
'A bit on the side' has its own invested identity-protective 'self-interest' and 'self-reinforcement' drawing from the field of active and passive support- as conditioned habit.
Such defences are made to mask or limit true creation, thus run as machine-thinking as 'self-protective' adaptation & resilience to risk or threat to persisting as (our) guide/protector).
Ideas thus mutate in minds that host them - as the mindset of a hacked or hijacked thought, perception and response.
If Self-evasion is understood to run undercurrent to 'self' survival in terms of invested 'skin in the Game', then the lie given power to mask & protect or distance from denied truth, represents a choice to enter, entrance or engage in a world of experience though the lens of mutually agreed self-illusions that provide the focus for -and in- a world we learn to think and see and experience as a compelling reality - of inhabited idea-projection, that can - in the sense of 'fallen angels' become a compulsive addictive identity - driving a depleting and destructive exchange of Soul or felt awareness as participance of being, for a world of progressive mutative fantasy gratifictions - of seeking value fulfilment in the hollowing out of the heart of a true receipt.
Our ego as Guide & Protector then, knows us not, but attends the defence of the bubble or encapsulation of a bubble of life set in a bit on the side that may have initiated a dream but then set the terms of a nightmare in which attempted escapes only reinforce the terms and conditions within 'solutions' that merely shift psychic energies to mask the pain and loss in a re-brand of sacrifice as virtue.

Predictive control is invoked as a modelling of Reality or Creation as security set against fear, lack and conflict. This is not because the body or forms of tangibility and visibility so defined, but because we so accepted definition under contract to mask and distance from the fear of denial that generates active denials. Hence the attack or denial of body and world as unworthy, weak, unreal, weak, and treacherous - to the 'mind' of a split that judges according to its own artificial lights - indeed gaslighting - as the use of guilted fear for persisting private or covert identity manipulation. It is this level of mutual agreement that binds love's expression (you) to a realm of sacrifical subjection seeking credits of remiussion or mitigation - as a 'better' version within the terms & conditions of a Game whose first rule is that it is not a game.

The narratives direct the attention and funding to the means to mutate or shift the narratives masking as thescience of a technologised psyop - that runs through our own beliefs, definitions and assumptions.
In very simple terms the story of Job posited an oppositional adversity to a native faith or self-honesty of being, as a means to shift the cultural consciousness from stark terror to initiate Communication within the Vortex of Infinite Power. Satan's wager was that Created Man was but a robot or conditioned react. A hackable animal. As such this represents our own fear of self-lack, self-conflict and self-solving mask of technologism - or thought that explicates to a tooled world of externalised 'solutions'.
But WHO told you you were naked? said the Lord?

 

This reflection was prompted by the complexity of a culture of fragmentation in

https://wrenchinthegears.com/2024/05/21/bobby-goes-ape-signaling-austins-lunar-punks/

But isn't a reference to its contents, but a pointer to seek the underlying patterns within a realm of obfuscation.