Wednesday, 26 March 2014

The dark age of scientism

An article in the Independent

James Lovelock: We need lone scientists

The creator of the Gaia Theory has also been a prolific inventor. Now in his 95th year, James Lovelock mourns the passing of the golden age of solitary scientific genius

If Science is a movement of willingness for the uncovering of truth - then there are no failures excepting to being distracted or diverted by the alternative; the investment of energy and attention in what is not true as if it was.
Yet that is not science in the true sense of a movement of living curiosity but scientism that has - as it were - become entangled in its own ego - or sense of itself as power unto itself.
The idea of peer group is the idea of witnesses. But if enough people share the same psychological defence bias (in self-protective ego-identification), even 99% consensus holds no more validity in the uncovering of truth than a 'loner' who has dared to step out or not be silenced by the 'consensual reality'.
To love the truth is not to own, define or control it - but to be free of the identification in such delusions enough to discern one from the other and be open to it.
Thus 'working models' are not confused with Reality.

A humbler and much more participative appreciation of Consciousness Itself, and human consciousness as a construct within it, remains available to a curiosity to challenge the 'truths' that exhibit the qualities of fear, guilt and control mentality. The dark ages are a symbol of asserting a false light - in whatever day and age.

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

The passive agrressive consumer

On a template propagation page for man made warming in the Independent, salparadise commented with a rant on corporate greed and government collusion, along with the claim that consumers didn't 'do it' but were getting 'the blame'.

I invite you to consider that 'consumer' mentality is exactly the passively managed condition that corporate systems depend on and cultivate. It is exactly the 'weak-mindedness' you deride. But it is actually a strong way of making ourselves weak.

The willingness to 'look the other way' while satisfying one's own 'getting' habit is actually a very active determination to remain unconscious of anything that exposes the nature of one's addictions and dependencies.
Masked fear controls the mind if it has not been owned and integrated - and is extremely ingenious in its disguises, corporate or consumer.
Divide and rule is the split minded way of trying to manage fear. I suggest it actually feeds and propagates the condition it is supposed to manage, while adding a level of helpless or compulsive dependency on external powers - who are essentially invited and employed to take on responsibilities that are not being owned.
Discernment is a heart-connected honesty to which our choices can be aligned. If we do not use it, then we are in effect 'choosing the world' that both supplies and programs our choices.
Whenever the guilt of blame and shame is utilized, the mentality of divide and rule is being employed to bait reaction. It works by reaction.
Debt and guilt are currencies of obfuscation and invalidation. We were/are happy to be the top-dogs while the colonized were denied real development, but now there is great fear of scarcity and so much less pie to go round - so join the Palestinians and live like dogs!
Fear is the common denominator. If we do not own our own fear, we remain conditioned (and manipulated) by it. Fear calls up defence mechanisms - look up the term and notice that our 'normal' consciousness is already in a sense, insane, disconnected, dislocated in split off personality.
A true foundation waits its recognition. While operating from a false self, truth is usurped. So, operate from a true foundation; one that is not coercive upon you.
"They" are us. We see the world through our own consciousness. We cant get rid of what is actually part of us, but we can see it for what it is and make a conscious choice as to whether we use it.
Consciousness responsibility is not an attempt to change the world in order to get something for ourself alone. It is giving the meanings to situations and relationships that is most aligned with the truth of your joy - of your wholeness.
The 'world', lacks our true presence. A true participant meets a different 'world', because one is not feeling deprived or denied. Living FROM wholeness is the art of being rather than seeking it as the artifice of mimicry.

# extra comment to a commenter who derided the toxic deniers that had appeared in the comments :

You use the term denier as if it had nothing to do with you.
This article reads as a planted propaganda template without scientific integrity.
Climate change is really happening - and has always been happening. Such fundamental change as we are meeting on every level of our consciousness brings up the archetypes of human guilt, and punishment. Scientists are no less human in their attachments, investments and identities than anyone else.
It is not only possible for over 95% to be 'wrong' it is a given - considering the blinkered bias of the human conditioning.
If you let yourself polarize, you are no longer in communication - but reacting defensively to that which does not agree with you.
The use of invalidating language is a weapon, not a communication - and it gives away a masked coercive agenda.
Take the blame, shame coercion out of the communication channel and see what can be seen. The toxic is not 'out there' - it is the active desire to see the other as guilty or invalid. Self-righteousness blinds. It also stinks.
Separate church (science) from state (corporate) THEN see what kind of world we uncover!

Monday, 24 March 2014

Why use truth when a lie is more profitable?

Evidence for human-induced climate change grows as 2013 is revealed as the sixth-hottest on record

Says the 'Independent'

There is irrefutable evidence of the propagation of the 'man made climate change' meme across a wide range of information services.
There is plenty of evidence that a business model is poised to generate income from it and the political opportunity to impose yet more restrictions and austerities under the aegis of 'dire necessity'. A centralisation of power.

Note that this Chicken Licken alarmism has set off most all the farmyard animals AND that Foxy Loxy is presuming to guide them to the wisdom of Owlsy Wowsy.

True environmental responsibility is an extension of consciousness responsibility.
The virtual reality that is peddled to suckling and unquestioning populations is a tool of management and indeed coercion. A kind of propaganda diversion to prevent exposure of inconvenient truths.
There are limitless opportunities for growth in health, wealth and shared happiness, but they are not available to the 'old wine bottles' of coercive deception.
Climate Change is like political change or any other event change. Change is inherent to the very structure and nature of experience, and within the bubble of self illusion we think to survive against it. This is not an expression of wisdom. Transformation occurs through the yielding of the illusion of control. The attempt to mimic this with 'applied shock tactics' cannot fruit a true foundation - no matter how intensely the ruling elite believe in its efficacy or its goal.

Change based on fear and guilt is no change at all. There are other ways to choose to relate to ourselves, each other and our world.

The climate change issue has hijacked genuine environmental concerns and is revealing (among other exposures) the hidden marriage of scientism and corporate interest.

We have a great opportunity to re evaluate Who we Are and what our relation to each other and our world Is, because our inherited model is worn out and dysfunctional. It is a kind of 'mindcontrol' in which we feel free to choose between ever more limited or meaningless options as if that was Life Lived and Shared.

There ARE vested interests at work in the 'climate change lobby' just as there are vested interests in sickness, war and systems of financial scarcity.

Can we have some journalism on the technologies of weather control that have been secretly developed over many decades?

How 'independent' is the Independent?

Thanks for the freedom to comment.

Deliberate and unconscious masked agendas

Ruthless Use of Missing Malaysian Airliner Reinforces Globalist Memes - See more at:
Ruthless Use of Missing Malaysian Airliner Reinforces Globalist Memes - See more at:

The Daily Bell points out the inserting of global warming propaganda into every kind of news article - including the missing Malaysian Jet

Ruthless Use of Missing Malaysian Airliner Reinforces Globalist Memes

While there are 'ruthless' pursuers of a private self interest, that use any ruse to get wealth and power (as they define it), there are many more who have accepted the belief in man made climate change as an extension of man made pollution, exploitation and blind greedy selfishness in all his works.

When a view is accepted that validates judgement of an evil in another - or in this case ourselves collectively, it breeds a self-righteousness - especially when the other does not agree with one's persuasions. A superficial rationality is soon abandoned for more 'effective' measures - as the goal is used to justify the means.

Whenever a goal is used to justify the means, a masked personal agenda is distorting and filtering perceptions and interpretations such as to only allow those interpretations and communications that 'support' the cause. Thus communication is lost to coercive intent. And indeed the mechanism of denial that is inherent in such a dynamic is immediately projected onto those who 'will not listen' (agree).

That a campaign was uncovered to be operating as a kind of propaganda war rather than scientific endeavour may itself have been a reaction to meeting a propaganda war from vested interests in countering anything that was believed to threaten those interests.

But clearly, whatever issues of climate are involved - including our degree of influence, issues of consciousness have coloured and distorted them so as to make it difficult to discuss and debate in a simple willingness to listen.

I see this issue as being 'science on trial' - for Science Itself cannot be guilty of anything - being simply a tool - but the manner in which it is practiced or subverted is of course open to being fitted to masked human agenda - whether the opportunistic manipulations of deceit, or that of unconscious archetypes of the split consciousness in fear, guilt and projection.

Science is liable to vanity and arrogant blindness as is any human endeavour, and just as tacitly communicated collective self interest can fuel a financial bubble of unreality that then crashes to misery, so too can a world view - considered real in its day - come crashing around us to reveal that we were deceived in ourselves.

It is true that there are those who choose to initiate or guide and harvest from deceit - but to rest in such perception is a convenient truth for the continued evasion of the uncovering of one's own personal agenda.

Change is the only constant - even change changes! And by it does Life reflect unto Itself.
When we fall asleep in meanings that we defend against change, we become suckers to our own scam - and of course invite others to join our 'party' at both ends of the 'food chain'.

I have a globalist goal here that I wish to share - and that is for global well being. I feel that this is never going to be as a result of enforcing any agenda on anyone - but of course force is part of the spectrum of our communication and necessary in maintaining conditions in which harm to self and others is limited such that better ways can be discovered.

But coercion operating through a mask is the 'same old story' of a fearfully disconnected blindness that we all know in ourselves at one degree or another.

I appreciate being able to discern the archetypes and symbols of consciousness in the world that I used to think was separate from my consciousness experience of it. I feel that learning to see the world in terms of our underlying definitions and beliefs, is a key to rewakening at a creative level which polarised struggle denies us.

If we personalize the issue, we lose the capacity to speak truth to 'power', and inevitably act in ways that feed the conflict rather than reveal the true issues beneath it. Primate Change is not only inevitable - but is not brought about by the presumed primacy and power of primate consciousness - but rather through its disintegration as an effective mask.

In the experience of 'loss of control' any and every attempt is raised to try to regain one's mojo - or even a semblance of power and control. These are destructive and frustrate true functionality. It is a terminal decline in terms of the ability to avoid transformation. Change we will - whether gracefully or with much wailing, woe and gnashing of teeth!

Because the carbon idea was charged with the fear idea, it became real enough for technologists to align a movement in response to its call. Not all of this is evil intent but may be barking up the wrong tree!

Alignment with our true being - as consciousness responsibility, inevitably includes an intimate relationship with our environment and each other - because we have accepted such intimacy within ourselves - and not otherwise.

One can learn to recognize the coercive elements of any interpretation or communication from the checkpoint of a free consciousness. Free to be what it is without coercion of guilt and fear and all their progeny. Regardless of the degree of man's influence on the cycles of change that are inherent to our Living Earth - I reject the element of coercive fear and presumed but hidden guilt. For I see these as the 'deceiver' - not that it is a person - but that it will personify and seem to validate its dark and dissonant premise, with reflected personal experience.

Thank you  - as ever - for the opportunity to speak into a shared attention.

Ruthless Use of Missing Malaysian Airliner Reinforces Globalist Memes - See more at:

Sunday, 23 March 2014

Consciousness machinery and creative expression

When robots take our jobs, humans will be the new 1%. Here's how to fight back

From assembly lines to highways, the workforce is becoming more autonomous. Good thing we're still smarter than machines

My comment on an article on humans being replaced by machines in the Guardian :

There is a sense in which our essential humanity is ALREADY replaced by a mechanism - and we are thus already 'operating' within a conditioned virtual reality.
The phrase 'the quick and the dead' is like as to the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law - for the former is a machine and the latter a living relational discernment.
By looking through the mechanism-lens of a rationality that is itsef the result of conditioning we 'see' a mechanical 'world' that not only reflect our rational models - in part - but also reflects all the supposedly irrational aspects of our consciousness at levels we perhaps are hardly - if at all, conscious of.

The mind of technos is a subset of creativity - that has become as if disconnected from the source of creativity and a power unto itself - or in its own right. The Faustian pact is one of giving up the unifying presence that one is, for the apparent capacity to add to or extend one's power OVER.

As long as this seems to offer meaningful escapes, solutions, or delays to the conflicted struggle of a split identity, it will be invested with the qualities of Life that are OURS to give. We then become dependent on what we have in a sense created by wanting it true. But Life in all its rich meaning is still yours to extend or give - because you are the Life - regardless of what your beliefs condition you to accept as your reality.

That robot thinking has already 'taken over' humanity is not new as a psychological insight - but few are willing or ready to look at our own consciousness in action rather than somewhat exclusively operate within its virtual reality.

Look within is a Universal wisdom that 'thinking' cannot use or make sense of for 'thinking' is the device that maintains a constant ever shifting and compelling distraction from looking within.

Consciousness is the elephant in every room, that is so tacitly disregarded as to have become almost always invisible - and what is permitted through the filters of defence is subverted into a terms of control.

This 'mentality' is not the Life beneath the play of constant change, nor the Light of true awareness nor the Way of giving as we receive. It is an 'imposture' that once we see in ourselves, we can wake from 'fearfully driven mentality of getting' to true relationship.

If we choose a mechanism of transaction in place of true relationship we trade in a living communication through which Life Knows itself ever anew, for a sort of false self-protectionism.
Love extends naturally through those who first accept it for themselves. The attempt to have power over Life brings fear and guilt and self-invalidation.

So much of our aspirations are to make life work better within such a prison rather than awaken from it, because we are afraid - and afraid to confront and become curious of our fear. So much so that we call forth the machine to protect us from such exposure. Yet this machine, born of the desire to hide fear can just as well be redefined and repurposed to serving communication rather than coercing it, in a desire for reintegration to the Whole-Souled being that we still are - regardless of the cast, the props, the make up and the script.

If we do not accept our 'consciousness responsibility' we let a preconditioned fear-thinking determine the choices we make as to who we are, what our place and purpose is in Life and our part in it.

So far, many of those who have uncovered directly of the creative level of definition and belief have tended to choose to use it for purposes of control - and have thus become deceived within a layer of distortion imposed upon what is already Moving as the unfolding experience of one unto itself. Trapped as it were in our own definitions and in fear of losing our self - our power of control - to a Life that we have forgotten how to recognize and flow with as our own.

We each make choices that directly effect our experience and our communication into the whole - but know not what we do. When the blind create mechanical systems to solve their limitations, they redefine unfaced responsibility into disguised solutions that redistribute and propagate the 'problem' into ever more complex limitations.

To be on purpose in the most conscious and conscientious meaning of the phrase, is to exercise unified will in place of indulging the fantasy of coercive power - which always invokes fear, guilt, anger and attack. And which demand a tyrannous dictate to protect against unleasing or being exposed to; the politics of terror.
Personally, I see the beast rising up from the deep such that we WILL make a CONSCIOUS choice as to who and what we choose to be in relation to our world-consciousness  - AS IT IS - rather than within false choices that serve to deceptively short-circuit our true conscious decision.