Banking, Liberty and true worth

 The Daily Bell

We're a libertarian publication and we believe the market itself is capable of creating fairness and competitive justice. If monopoly central banks were removed from the system, people would gradually revert to local currencies as well as silver and gold. Absent further force, the larger commercial banks would fall apart. No one would want to do business with them.

My commentary:

If I write overlong for a 'fleeting moment' - just feel for a paragraph or sentence that holds some interest and just use it for a reflection of your own self-honesty. Which can be deeply covered over but never completely eradicated.

Hmmm... you believe in the market for fairness and justice!

I believe human beings are capable of recognizing or owning their errors and repenting of them - but I am not waiting for anyone ELSE to recognize and release anything I uncover in myself as working against my own joy in life. Is liberty waiting for the removal of banking deceits to regain its nature? Or is some consensual or coercively set idea of liberty at war with other such ideas? Is liberty something to 'sell' to people or induce compliance with after inducing scarcity or pain? For such fears can obscure a true foundation and operate to keep it hidden.

Is the 'market' a person, or a creative agent, or is it a short-cut generalisation for the flow and exchange of goods and services - including information - in which persons and personal investments are operating a set of definitions over the creative agency that is  responsible for That we have consciousness in which to make choices and the ability to frame them in ways that validate some and obscure or invalidate others?

The golden rule exhorts treating others as you would yourself like to be treated - and works well when a true sense of worth is accepted and extended. But in the adulteration or corruption of worth, the grounding standard of gold is exchanged for shifting and arbitrary values of socially defined agreement that operate do unto others what you wish to escape or deny in yourself. In other words there is no longer a basis for recognition and trust in oneself or from oneself in relation with others - and the 'market' that operates in a false or negatively defined sense of self interest (ie - as the fearful avoidance of negative outcome by outsourcing it away from one's sense of self), is never going to balance in a positive or integrative accord.

I do feel for the undoing and replacement of coercive rules with a more aligned capacity to focus in what is wholly valuable - rather than in complex instruments of concealment and deceit that hide toxicity behind some sort of trojan front. But without addressing a deeper aspect of our personal and collective conditioning - we merely rest our case of foundations of theoretical concept that may be 'partially' true or point to some truths - such as the synergy and synchronicity of true self interest in patterns of spontaneous harmony of shared benefit.

The relinquishment of coercive 'externally applied' force is an individual freedom by which true freedom is restored awareness. Just as the trading of such freedom for a promise of personal power or protection operates the denial of free willingness in preference for a tyrannous 'will' or dictate of conforming force - (and its resultant reactive counter force & etc).

The idea of worth is fundamental to all else - and if something is only 'worth doing' because it generates personal profit or 'salvation' - then creative endeavour is withheld while unworthy but 'profitable' acts multiply to feed an un-worthy sense of self - such as our pharmageddon, the millitary-combustrial complex and its technocratic narrative of economic 'necessity' or Notional Security.

People are capable of fairness and justice that operates as balance points between apparently competing interests. The goldman idea that not only must one win - but the other must know their loss - is a mind of vengeance - hatred.

The state monoplozed power in part to check and limit mafia or robber barons from capturing and controlling 'markets' or indeed a subjective sense of survival identity - as an act of social, economic and political coercion. That the state itself is then captured by such mentality of ruthless or unfair and uncaring hatred for lives of others or our Planet is indicative of the shallowness of conventional consciousness and its susceptibility to mind - or narrative control.

Re-wakening consciousness as a true sense of worth is the undoing of the basis upon which the false or mis-identified sense of self is both fed upon and fed-managed and medicated to remains such a 'food-source'.
Coming off of drugs that alter brain bio-chemistry (as if to manage relational issues in terms of 'organic' disease postulated as such a lack requiring rebalance) - often requires a stepping stone process of supported withdrawal unto the point of awakened responsibility. For the homoeostasis of any system operates to incorporate and cope with stress of deficiency or danger - and identifies in maintaining that 'establishment' as its sense of balance and even survival.

Liberty is as does - and if as I hold, liberty is the realm of choice or free willing acceptance - then we don't work to undermine the capacity to choose - but join in it and strengthen in it against the ideas of a false liberty in which responsibility for consequence is out-sourced onto others - and a narrative justification asserted in place of an open handed presence of discernment.

Idea about liberty is the perfect trojan by which to trap the libertarian into an exclusive identity amidst a competing conflict of identity that effectively diverts and dissociates from true worth - and indeed will maintain there is no such thing - for life is what you make it. But Life is Already - and what we make OF it is not the same as usurping it within a matrix of manually managed and medicated 'mindshare'.

If 'if' shall be replaced by is - rather than be indefinitely un-embodied wishful thinking), then central banking is removed from my system and I redeem all things to true currency - in steps of recognition and action that regenerate culture upon a true grounded tangible - rather than complex convoluted mysteries of a 'higher order'. By living from a true foundation - the capacity to recognize a true account is grown. But clever thinking never actually arrives at a true starting place - being always a way of persisting the establishment of such private agenda over the whole.

Crisis of Misinformation

Crisis of Misinformation
(Commentary to the entanglements within mis-identity)

There are facets to governance that are serving to hold the balance points - and there are usurpations or corruptions of governance that operate to distort and coerce outcomes - so as to perpetuate an 'out of balance' as if it were order - ie: power elitism.
Just using the term government may fog the issue. The legitimate process of serving the reintegration of a true balance is not one of stripping away all remaining checks to rapacious plunder...
People can and do elect to operate collectively as well as individually - whether that be in corporate cartels or trade unions and social movements of any kind. Of course the collective soon becomes prey to 'leaders', subversions, infiltrations, dilutions and corruptions, but that is not to deny that there WAS a collective alignment or movement for change.
Individualism is generally an elitist aspiration - because only those with some sense of power in their lives or indeed power in Life - will stand outside the inherited or dictated narratives of power.
Conditioning has more than a surface mentality - such as the misinformation and propaganda reflect, it has deep subconscious and unconscious core that all propaganda seeks to trigger and hook into.
The mind - as it is generally equated with the thinking of the persona - is simply a personal propaganda in attempt to defend against core fears and negative beliefs.
The overwhelming flood of misinformation brings the sense of sickness and insanity of not being able to trust ANY thinking whatsoever. While this is a wretched emotional state - it is exactly the basis of awakening a deep desire for truth - for something - ANYTHING - True! The awakening FROM mentalism to a heartfelt Life-Connected integrity of relationship and communication is the key shift from which all else will in time follow - because once one is sickened by lies and moves from investing in them - one is back in the realm of a receptivity to Life - as it is Moving - and not entirely entangled within narratives of self-serving-vanity.
Clinging to the investment in propaganda may take to side of being against what seems a dangerous and even evil 'individualism' - or against a dangerous and evil collectivism - but the truth that I feel to share here - is that we are given a will - a receptivity and expressive manifestation of what is received - in order to feel the situation for ourselves and discern how define ourselves in relation to it according to our true desire.
This is very different from asserting power over others - often by undermining it in others and inducing them to give it away to a predetermined agenda. There is no relationship of communication in that case - only deceit and coercion - in which a captive conformity is presented.
True individualism is based in an indivisibility that one has to extend, in order to receive - and recognize. Accepting placeholders as substitutes for the real thing is the pattern of using the FORM of Life as a way of denying (and gaining power over) Life. Readers here are likely aware of this as financial scams but perhaps less so in terms of the currency of ideas - as if ideas were separate conceptual things rather than inter and intra relational and vibrational communication.
Reading the movement or energy of the moment at hand has largely been subordinated to command and control (fear and power agenda). It is that which operates the negative version of the 'invisible hand'. Not the energetic movement Itself. The ideas through which we identify and relate are determining the perception-experience we then appreciate - or suffer.

Praetor:

As time goes on. The deception will increase. Alt-news is now speculating and discussing the use of green screens on the MSM channels and how this will effect perception of events. Just watch a 'good' sci-fi movie and amaze at how real it appears, and knowing all the time its not real. As time goes on. The deception will increase, and the truth will be very hard to discern!!!

To Praetor:
All the more inducement to develop discernment in place of giving trust to ANY forms. For any form of idea or appearance can be used as a trojan through which to hide agenda that belies the presentation. We do this first to deceive ourself - and use others as the power of agreement whereby to 'make real' such pretences. Whether those 'others' be considered power conferring masters, power joining allies, or our vanquished powerless underlings.
Exactly what Is 'reality' is a profound question - because everything else - bar nothing - proceeds FROM that. The attempt to determine of conform reality to self-concept is a profound and fragmenting confusion.

To hold a true presence when everyone else has lost their heads

At the Telegraph;
Letters: Britain won’t be any safer from terrorism until it has regained control of its borders

 My Letter:
It may seem as if the world events are orchestrating the frustration of the capacity to control life rather than communicate it - and I mean truly communicate - not dictate or persuade or overwhelm with intellectual 'superiority' or cunning deceit. The more 'control' applied the more out of control everything actually becomes - and this invites opportunistic plunder, pillage and usurpation of residual sovereignty.
It isn't so much we get what we deserve so much as meet the reflection of our true sense of worth... or lack thereof.
If one denies Life to the living forcefully enough, one awakens rage. For such rage is the raw desire to live - but without acceptance and reflection within a true and current living consciousness, it merely consolidates the original error, rather than aligning in safe or contained expression to a shifted perspective.
To find a true presence when everyone else is lost in the head - or have lost their head is not a dollop of cream on top of Maslow's cake - but to attend the Call to live as the primary concern - and though this does mean affordable food, homes and opportunity in life - it has to first find a true foundation - rather than the corrupted template that the moneylenders operate.
If we give unto Caesar what is due to our true being - we but trash our self. And those who hate their self are inevitably hateful regardless the veneer of civilised justifiction that is asserted.
What goes around, comes around. What we align with and attune to is an attractive force or resonance of correspondence. However - most of who we are is denied and unconscious. We don't even know that we know not what we do. Because we focus in the movie of narrative perceptual distortions - as a way of not seeing or being denied vision - of what lies beneath.

Call to wake or alarmist agenda?

Earth Overshoot Day: Humanity consumes 100% of planet's resources in eight months

What is the true alarm or call within alarmist articles?
 

Humanity is vastly more resourceful as is The Earth - than the cartels of limiting and controlling supply  would allow to flower - or they would lose such 'control'. But something is correct here - the persistence of a coercive control mentality increases deprivation by the layering of denials and controls of such denials. death is the logical outcome from denying and limiting One Self - be that replaced with judgements of self-justified righteousness of any kind - in their illusion of power that splits off from un-faced fear to then seek to resolve, fix or overcome it in externalized projections. A managed living death is all that is on offer from a blinded and corrupted idea - but clinging to the fantasies of fulfilment as a virtual reality layer by which to make such pain and futility bearable.
The Foundation is lost to a false sense of self and thus Everything is out of true. Restore the true Foundation and see just how unimaginably a healed perspective can align resources that we have forgotten we have denied and deprived ourselves of.
It is the mentality of a false foundation in denial of its true state that is to become extinct. The meek shall inherit the Earth because they  are receptive to their true inheritance. The version of Earth that is seen through a glass darkly is as false a currency as debt-based money creation which expands debt as a form of control. Denial mentality grows denial in the FORMS of gaining power and control over unrecognized fear - as a result of false foundational beliefs.

Marriages are of an intimacy of being - not of state power

A Simple Solution to the same sex marriage war
from the Daily Bell

- - -

A breath of fresh air. Thanks. I felt prompted to mention civil partnership and some observations about 'marriage'.

In Uk a 'civil partnership' is denied opposite sex couples. (Some obligations and rights accrue from "Living Together as Husband and Wife" even though not married).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_partnership_in_the_United_Kingdom

However, neither the state - nor any other institution in our case - has anything to do with the consecration of our relationship in Life. Nor has mere material mechanism any sight of it excepting to note or quantify behaviours from which to 'reverse engineer' in theories that simply embody their starting point. If we should ritually witness and declare our willingness for love within a group or community it would be the extension of such a gift within a larger willingness and capacity to share in its blessing. For that which touches the many as one without coercion is reflected in our relationship together but not defined by it or any part of it alone. Ritual sanctification cannot make the untrue, true, but witnessing strengthens by sharing.

A civil partnership operates a legal framework of agreement that provides for the civil rights, duties and protections of a relational entity and leaves the nature of that relationship open. It is not pretending to deal with spirituality nor presuming to sanctify. That aspect retains the freedom of the relationship - within its larger relational context. It doesn't presume to exercise 'moral' power. Nor have power to disqualify or invalidate moral integrity.

Definitions are our primary currency. The 'gold standard' of definitions is tangible and demonstrable - shareable - meaning and value. You know who you are in the act of extending and sharing it in act of thought word and deed.  Adulteration of currency with the mere forms derived from presumed, believed or expected meanings, leads to trading in debt - where something is gotten without extension of shared worth. What is gotten without an extending of appreciation can hardly be recognized or shared as value, and so a 'materialism' of transactional getting substitutes for a living communication, and if this is accepted currency then the form of relationship serves to actively substitute for intimacy of being - and becomes a defence against it!

The wealth of meaning and value that shared life (lived relationship) opens is beyond measure - but can be covered over by a sense of unworthiness and fear of loss, which immediately project onto the other and thus triggers attempts to coerce and control which necessarily deceives by hiding the act of self-hatred or fear in strategic presentations that deny or  try overcome what is made fearful by hiding it.

Marriage can mean many things to many people. But what makes a marriage alive is what that relationship is consecrated to or founded upon, and thus brought to the relationship in free willingness. The forms of marriage by themselves do not constitute a living commitment of sharing life, but they may reflect evolving patterns of personal and social need.

Truth is not a matter of fixing down definitions so as to mutually agree, but of accepting and living what is true for oneself without imposing upon others. The idea of determining truth has been subordinated to the 'divide and rule' that limits to form based set of meanings, which can then be manipulated. But discerning truth is a matter of listening and speaking in truly shared willingness. That is, it is itself a real relationship to which what is untrue is brought to light and resolved at the level of current willingness. The act of withholding or withdrawing from willingness for communication is of an wilful but often unconscious identification within a fear or unworthiness that effectively operates in lieu of choice. There is a timing for the free willingness to accept that cannot be forced. At times the most loving act is to effect a form of separation, but not in denial of the others innate capacity to seek and find the awareness of love in a way they can accept and understand.

In attempting to articulate, I offer a framework of reflection. It is not asserting 'truth' upon anyone but extending willingness to whoever it should resonate and be relevant.

What anything is, may be acknowledged or denied by how we define it in usage - regardless of lip-service.