Saturday, 25 February 2017

End of the Story or vengeance as usual?

Under the article:
Trump, Watergate, Nixon, Rockefeller: the real lesson
jerseyg said:   

If “they” didn’t want Trump to win, he’d have never gotten into the WH in the first place. Their high tech weapons could have taken him out long before he even won the nomination. Let’s get real here. Attributing all the power to the Rockefellers and Rothschild and then acting as if they created such a monumental blunder of letting him slip through to the presidency is a ridiculous assumption. He is beholden to the zionists. They financed him through his failures. He is their puppet. End of story.

- - -

"End of story?"
Rather, the continuation of 'Story' as 'narrative control'.
Look how everyone takes a part in the framing of events. Are we being manipulated? Or are we suckling the juices of our own emotional investment?

But your point is that Trump - for all the 'outsider' status - (true within certain levels of identity aligned within Establishment Was) -  was/is being run by 'insider' cabal - even if as a 'controlled explosion' or shaped charge.

No asset - allowed or installed into agency of power or influence - is to be allowed to out-serve or out-grow its purpose. Nor will such a notion of power itself out-serve or out-grow its purpose.

So while we invest in Its framing as our own aligned identity - such purpose serves out its time in Story.

One of the realisations of noticing (aka mindfulness), is that attention WAS scattered and fragmented in preoccupation with fantasy of past and future imaginations. But the 'continuity manager' or ego of self-sense runs the automaton of a fantasy life or subjected virtual reality of adjustment to its lack of presence - so as to present worthiness, love or power - as if one had it. Possession is the name of the game - for who would possess, is thus possessed or entranced by the game until played out.

Story calls for sacriface in justifiction, which is backwards. Original nature creates from a just or true awareness in which no one has to deny or be denied, to behold it is good - very good.
A false sense of rightness asserts and propagates the very 'evil' it sees in OTHER - as its own blindness. Some carry this role to extremes - but it takes one to know one. Noticing allows awareness of choice and change in place of an apparently unchangeable self, mind or reality.

But the wish something be true... or not true - resets and reinforces the conditioned imprint of the golem. Fantasy fulfilment has one outcome - no matter how often repeated... unfulfilment. Be that structured upon the symbols of love or power.

In a book I appreciate is the line: "There is no life outside Heaven" - and yet of course what passes as life, is traded in and exchanged and made real to such mind-drift into unreality - is viciously defended against wholeness of being, against a light in which a mistaken identity is no longer accepted or accorded real. Gone!

- - -

A further comment in the page:

"The people spoke loudly enough"... (referring to Trump's election)

Was that rage seeking vengeance or a refusal to accept false power over true sovereignty of being?

I'm not asking anyone to speak for anyone else - but to ponder that these can be co-fused and reversal operate such that the demonic is accorded faith - or the true healing messengers - demonsided and killed.

The Lie - and the identity trick

The Corbett Report "Why do people lie about climate change?"  (and lots else too).


The question ' why do people lie'' is posed within the surface assertion that freedom exists at the personal level and presumption that we have it.

The answer is that fear (terror) operates beneath and within - and upstream to the personality focus, AS the basis (along with victimhood) for the personality led (sic) experience.

Top-down or externally imposed fear of pain and penalty, conditions the mind in conformity to evade threat - and much of this occurs beneath the waking consciousness - so that the moment of choice is given a blind eye. Any sense of Self-betrayal is then associated with the failure and treachery of 'others'.

The 'lie and the father of the lie' - aka the 'tares among the wheat '- is untruth given power of acceptance and allegiance as true. This operates a 'Forgetting' or denial of our true nature in creative freedom that operates an 'anti-life' principle or agenda... until Awakening from the spell of the illusion of power as falsely framed by fear or lack.

Within awakened responsibility, 'negative agenda' is repurposed to serve the opening of new perspective upon creative freedom. For such is the implicit nature OF Creation. However, a false sense of freedom is the power to override and exploit Life under mis-taken image, symbol and concept of self/reality- which is a use of mind in denial of Life - that then declares the denying sense to be life! This is a reversal that accuses everyone (else) of what IT does.

Power in the world can make and break you - in the world - and the making of such a self is the subscription to its world of conflicted reality, because the persona masks the un-owned and unhealed conflicted self.

So why do we lie but because it serves a purpose in that moment that we believe saves us from pain or loss of self. This is what the mind was made to do as a protector and defence against fear of pain and loss of Self - with the instruction to never let it be lived again. ("Hold that door Hodor!"- Game of Thrones ref).

BUT there is no freedom or joy in a substitution-life - excepting in a vanity and arrogance of exploiting and using life (our relations) for private gratification, and thus become hollow. The reluctance to accept this takes time to recognize - so timing is everything.

The replacement of true with false was a blind self-serving self-belief - bolstered by a sense of adversity and enmity (and secretly dependent upon it - because only persistent conflict establishes the conditions in which truth is denied awareness) - But the re-awakening of true is of a different foundation that does no violence to the false foundation - but simply shines to knowing. This quality of being establishes a different consciousness than what increasingly is now recognized to have been reactive conditioning (while believing itself free).

The pathways of mutual entanglement and individual responsibility set up a dream that turned to nightmare, and have persisted as further dissociation and fragmentation ever since. And so within each of us, is a timing that honours our free willingness - or power of acceptance - whilst illuminating the illusion of self to its increasingly recognized checkmate or futility and facilitate the clear choice between alignment in true and the submission to false.

The desire to persist as the dream operates to keep such awareness out of focus. For example; if something calls your attention and you follow it - and persist in that while ignoring the call to a wholeness of being, you are not disconnected from wholeness of being - but the dissonance of such persistence brings that belief and experience as a result.

Our submission to fear-reinforcing 'reality' is the submission to Narrative Identity. But the yielding of such mind to the true movement of being is to be graced with a mind renewed - and living AS this (of this movement in being) is the way to grow and share and thus abide as our waking life.

In a recent Corbet report discussion:  there was a shared appreciation of the need for a true foundation FIRST - because otherwise the error goes forth to multiply - as if getting everyone ELSE to change is the prime directive. See how the sacrifice of self appears and appeals in the form of an evasion of having to yield to true. Why do we - any of us - evade, avoid, deny or block out truth? Because the mind is Already the act of so doing and we follow it as our self.

Within our relationships in the world - this is because feared truth terrorizes or conforms us to false 'self-presentation as a sense of self-preservation' - and operates as 'natural' strategic self-interest. But within the denial or masking of such fear is the WISH that something-be-true that embodies the denial as a mitigated or limited sense of pain and loss. Again this is experienced as self-inflation and self-importance and not in the underying terms that set it.

The lie is thus a 'convenient truth'. For those seeking insulation from pain and loss - as the embrace of a crusade that gives them some sense of righteous or powerful or helpful identity.  This operates the motif of "don't let the truth get in the way of a good story'.

We are each invested in our own 'story' and that is not wrong as an exploration of teaching/learning and uncovering of what we find in such a  journey experience, (and not necessarily in terms of the goals of the characters. Life is for living - not for-getting or for using up!

I find that I CANNOT interfere with or change another - I cannot 'tell' anyone anything they are not already of a willingness to know or a vibrational match to the communication. So the narrative frenzy of an attempt to TELL (others) what to do, substitutes for sovereignty of will, as addiction to Story - and to the power of the telling. For regardless the 'powers that be' - the secret judge within operates the same in all.

- - -


My response to a climate change exchange on the same page - with regard to 'conspiracy of controlling agenda' vs pumping toxins into the atmosphere.

You bring up (retch?) another facet to the Climate con's piracy - and that is the capture of the true environmental movement (regarding actual toxic effect/fouling the nest) to a demonisation of CO2 which is absolutely essential to Life on Earth and to life more abundant! You may notice you breath is partially under your control - but you are not in control of breath. Likewise covert weather modifications can and do effect weather but do not control climate.

The Universe is essentially electromagnetic resonance - not gravitic - in nature - and Solar and Galactic influence are airbrushed out or hidden by the agenda that rides the gravy train of an induced scare-city.

Common sense - as I see it - pauses from ANY thought of reaction or identification to FEEL what is going on here - as the context to 'facts' being thrown about, colluded in and made identity of.

You can tell when a fear agenda is being used to manipulate a response - IF - your identity is not already running reactions that prevent you from pausing to see, hear, feel and know.

I don't care if the end of of the world is nigh if such news is being subverted and exploited to serve a fear agenda - a toxic agenda - a death agenda. No thanks!

Keeping a channel of Communication OPEN - is abiding in a connected presence WITH whatever is going on. This means NOT falling for the trap of a fearful identity - and that takes practice over time to get your life back - if you let it drift into a false sense of power and protection that you must start to realize is a racket you ultimately subject yourself TO - regardless the manipulators or the force of common illusion as the allowed reality.

Conspiracy is a poor term to use because it is coined by CIA and used to invalidate critical challenge to Narrative Control - which is going on in the open - but hardly anyone sees it - because they think within its framing. Half of this is that people WANT unconsciousness relative to their fears, shames, rages, that grow out of a deep sense of guilt and terror. No wonder - but it doesn't WORK to stuff toxicity out of 'mind' when it still runs covertly ALL THE TIME. The other half is that a power structure - and a market, arise from meeting the demand for unconsciousness, that fuse to become a slave-owning elitism - though it may start out as shepherding the flock to hold the balance of needs of the tribe and society.

Just below the surface reality is hate of private agenda that justifies itself by what they hold as done to them - or even the threat that it might be. So it doesn't seem like hate - it might feel like saving the Planet! But anyone NOT in that self-righteous compulsion can Feel immediately that these people are driven - compelled - fearful and coercively demanding - and there's no talking to them in the terms they set except to become entangled in the same nonsense!

Tell me when change HASN'T been the nature of life in the body. Show me anything that does not rise and fall from awareness as part of the always changing experience of being. There's no such Thing, but the wish and the grasp and the defence and the fear of loss all make an identity that loses TOUCH with its own nature - and periodically has to re-align with what is actually here - rather than running on Narrative Control.

Everything is Changing - and the basis on which we 'think' is changing - which feels like the breakdown of reality (but it's the dissolution of unworkable identity). In the true flow of our joy in being - no 'identity' needs assert its right or justify or apologise for being all that it is. Identity struggle is the adjustment to being out-of-true instead of living out-from-true. Struggle resorts to every kind of coercion and deceit - but true being is a no-brainer. No need to call in the dark arts of obfuscation. Feel your way - and all your resources align as needed.

It is true that those focusing on 'conspiracy to wield power over us' tend to also become fearful and polarized in identity Against Them. One can only start with where one is at, and the disturbance of uncovering a fake world is the beginning of an unfolding 'journey' to true apprecaition - a real world we can actually meet in and work and play and rest in - without all the armouring and fakery of masked intent.

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

NASA to Announce Alien Life?

NASA to Announce Alien Life?

- - -

 The pushing of this meme in the main stream, to prepare the way for "we are not alone in the Universe" - may serve the fear-drip..drip..drip that frames attention in stress chemistry (in which a sense of disconnect from true feeling being operates the fight or flight response). But it can serve the recognition that the belief "we are alone" - which is a collective expression of a personal sense of isolation - is NOT true - and that the framing of an exclusive sense of defence against fear COSTS us our true being.

The 'alien'-ation of our true being makes us stranger unto our self. As for top-down consensus - how else could a lid be kept on the fear of loss of control. But - if you are following this - how much of what we assign the term 'control' to, is in fact an investment in illusion of control that actually generates or feeds disorder.

Life that is not within our sense of definition and control is often feared - because we contain urges or motives that are fearful and hateful. Including the manipulation of others by leveraging their guilt and fear.

What to believe and who to trust in these times? Without a true foundation, one can be in effect 'phished' or hacked by someone else's thinking running as if your own. Especially when this is an emotionally triggered reaction.

Meeting the reality of an 'other' Life can only be through the true of our own. Or else we simply 'meet' our fears or 'shadow self' and recoil in horror in attempt to kill it - shut it down - put a lid on it - hide...

But whatever we deny is only pretended away - and is no less active in our reality for being redefined or re-assigned. The desire NOT to know is the mask - and yet the desire to know and be known is a movement of being. Disclosure can be a wonderful surprise or a traumatic dissociation. Are we preparing for a life more abundant - or to compress into further fragmentation? We are beings of choice - but only within conscious awareness.

The kind of people we attract into our lives is not random and the qualities we draw out of those we meet is not random. Fear given negative imagination is mis-creative or as they say - a self fulfilling prophecy. And wishful or good 'intentions' are only a further mask over un-owned fears.

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

Is Marriage the power of the State?

The case for civil partnerships for heterosexual couples is refused

I commented into the Guardian paste up of an article:

When the State legislates 'marriage' - that 'marriage' becomes a matter of state legislature.
So the state 'marriage' is in fact a civil partnership status called 'marriage'.
The expropriation of living relational participations and indeed freedoms - by the state - are its controls in the name of 'fairness' or evenness.

When the law is made into a weapon for private or elitist agenda - it is no longer the Law - but the demand of 'Caesar' regardless what system is apparently in place.

"The other two judges effectively said ministers can have longer to review the situation."

What is the missing phrase here - 'be allowed'?

I feel the patriarchal issue irrelevant. If same sex couples are free to obtain legal rights and protections in civil partnership - why not ANY couple? What exactly is to lose here? Is the institution of marriage being used as a weapon of social engineering? Where are journalists in these times?
The idea of controlling people is never recognized to be the basis for creating more disorder in ever more complex forms - leading to bankruptcy and exhaustion. Or is it?

- - -

Further to the above, The Guardian ran an article - of 'reader opinions' but no comments open beneath titled:
"Should heterosexual couples be allowed to enter civil partnerships?"
Please pause to notice the way this is framed. Do you pick up when language is manipulatively framed?
What reason is there for denying civil partnership status under the law to consenting adults?
Who decides that heterosexual partnerships should not be allowed access to the same rights as extended homosexual partnerships? Apparently, two out of three judges.

Social engineering operates a kind of mind-control in many ways and on various levels.
I appreciate the recognition and support for relationships of commitment and yet assigning these  - and all else - to the State - is a false religion.

Sunday, 19 February 2017

What lies beneath

I read the following article

How to institutionalise the world
by Darren Allen

and felt glad to meet Off-guardian's willingness to give focus to the issues addressed - but felt it presumed too much that was already conflicted - so wrote my own offering to the themes of what lies beneath...

Inner conflict embodies separation trauma; the denial or suppression and evasion of which calls up the masking persona  as 'survival' within a world of split minded conflict to which the living is sacrificed and lost love and power are sought in substitution of 'external' conditions, gratifications, validations.

Mind as evasion operates the persona in terms of positive achievements but always secretly defined or framed in negative belief. Such is addiction or identification in externals by sacrifice of self as the means to 'get' what they are believed to offer.

Until an addict recognizes and owns their addiction - they live the denial of it and their minds operate self-justification and shifting evasions of diversion or presentations of listening or understanding that are simply ways not to listen while seeming to be in relationship. I could say everyone is addicted to their own thinking - until the lack of true foundation for such thinking is seen and accepted - not merely thought about. We do not recognize the addiction when we react as if it is in fact our true function of mind when it is conditioned reaction - whose conditioning traces back to the imprinting of fear in guilt, hidden by denial, protected by thinking that embodies the strategy of 'surviving' in terms of the particulars of the separation trauma of its core beliefs.

The use of thinking - which at root is communication - for the limiting, defining and control of communication is a breakdown in communication. The very attempt to define and control operates the lack of listening and of truly spontaneous response. It systemizes and manually overrides a 'fallen' nature - where the error of mind is projected onto nature and attacked - and then validated in all the 'proofs' of guilt that a preset belief puts there.

Key to all is the nature of mind as the distorting filter of the true - and of joining in ideas - many of which are tacitly induced and communicated - is how they are strengthened as witnesses to a reality of interpretation - where the filters of that interpretation are hidden and covered with defences of diversion and taboo to ensure against exposure to reliving the pain or terror of the mind our thinking rose to blot out.

I have written of the covering over of our sovereign nature and its sacrifice in 'gaining the world' - but the quality of our true nature is a directly felt recognition that cannot be defined or described nor needs any such mind to perfectly be itself. The reintegration of the belief in fragmentation within the felt recognition of being exactly You - is of an abiding in and of this quality of being - that in simple terms is the call to joy rather than the call to sacrifice.

Because fear and guilt were hidden in the evasive manoeuvre - the reintegration or undoing is an exposure or bringing to light of what was denied within the desire for healing, wholeness of being, sanity of true presence.

The shifting from fear-defined self to a conscious recognition and acceptance will generally meet extremity of conflict. Particulary while the old mind-framing is used to 'make sense' of (demand sacrifice of) the new.

Releasing the mind is simply not using it as a basis from which to act until and unless it is within a clearly felt recognition of being. If you want to fool yourself, you can and you will - but if you have opened relationship with true, you will not tolerate self-betrayal regardless how good the alibi or the cover story by which to seem right.

Fake news is the mind that wants something ELSE to be true - and gives that priority over true. If one only looks OUTSIDE to resolve what for each of us is an inner conflict then we seek to make sure never to find. If we look inside without the context of real relationship we are certain to find endless conflict upon which to make fantasy of escape that likewise has no real intent or capacity to be truly found but makes the search into an endless diversion from simple self honesty now.

Losing face is a socially invalidating experience - but the mask is not the source of worth - so much as the need to act as if you had it. True worth extends and is recognized in reflection. False presentations assert or impose to be validated in reaction. Conditional 'love' says "if you break my conditions, you will meet withholding of worth, the receipt of guilt for causing pain and rejection or open conflict'. Society operates collective agreements and conditions - some of which are consciously acknowledged, most of which are tacitly asserted and conformed to.

Consciously held culture embodies the worth of Life even if alloyed with the fears and limits and distortions of fear of loss of worth and life. True culture is not a system but lived values that are uncovered in real relationship. Systems that truly serve Life do not demand the sacrifice of life to protect and maintain the system!