Showing posts with label innocence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innocence. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

But Who Wants Peace?

crakinshot"Boris Johnson has called for the presumption of innocence to be reversed"

Quite possibly the scariest policy I've ever heard a politician (with power) come up with.

LondonsEye crakinshot 26 August 2014 12:44pmHe was referring to the Jihadists returning back to Britain. Not your normal everyday joe living in the UK, don't take it out of context!



My reply to LondonsEye

You are aware that 'anti' terrorist laws and procedures have become simply part of a mindset that is NOT confined to a specific context?

That the definition of 'terrorist' is expanded and in effect redefined to mean whatever the existing or established 'power of the day' determines it to mean?

If anything or anyone for any reason is determined to be a threat of any kind and for any reason deemed in the notional interest - then they can become the recipient of dehumanising actions and intent.

I declare that we are not defined by what others have 'done' unto us or unto our loved ones, but by what we choose to give. It is by what proceeds 'out from our own mouth' (mind) that we are corrupted.

Is 'your normal everyday joe living in the UK', a conditioned and manipulatable part of a 'bot-net' whereby the very few act upon the very many as if to represent the authority of the whole?

The 'holy war against jihadists' operates an example of using the hated scapegoat to invoke and acquire the power that is willingly given to the scapegoat by those who have been baited and triggered into fear.

A cunning device that is used over and over and over without anyone noticing, because the fearful WANT to direct their hatred and fear AWAY from themselves. In order to take it out of true context and act it out upon a world of judged against 'others'.

Cast ye the first stone who is without sin!

Even as ye do unto the least of my brethren, ye do unto Me.

To truly enter into a process of communication must be willing to be uncovered in our OWN dissonance and misalignment of self.

The extension of a clear and true presence does not require or employ coercion, nor evoke in others the reactions to a sense of being coerced.

But who wants peace?

Monday, 21 October 2013

Charity begins at home - naked truth

Warwick women rowers strip off for charity. But is that okay?






What does 'exploited' mean?

Are the women exploiting the known trigger points of cultural ideas of attractiveness in order to sell more calendars and attract more money to an un-unrelated (to naked women) charity?
Is not the idea of 'raising money for charity' a device that is exploited for its own reasons?
Perhaps the term exploited is more associated with coercive force, or of being manipulated such as to be unaware of the choices one is taking or of other choices available.
Exploiting is an aspect of 'getting'. One might say we all exploit ourselves, each other and our world, in that we will all seek to get something for ourselves - unless we are already happy, whole and connected, in which case we share rather than 'get'.

A key issue is whether we receive and give in a sense of honour and trust, rather than 'get' at another's expense without any real relation.
But the key issue to the women's project might be 'how do we raise money for xyz?' - and feel for their comfort zones and sense of adventure both. Because 'charity' is the remaining avenue of 'justification' for behaviours outside social conformity.

The 'getting' mode, is seemingly innocuous and harmless - but it cannot be employed without a psycho-emotional disconnect, and the 'justification' mentality rises as one with it - as is symbolized by fig leaves in the myth of the Fall.

"Ye have not because ye ask not" - is a reference to a direct self revealing extension of trust and communication. A true intimacy shared. We sacrifice the power of love in a darkness of forgetting, in order to 'enjoy' the private sense of power in 'getting' - except we then suffer experience of being 'gotten from' and loss and fear of loss replaces trust, and a mask replaces our true presence, in which praise and blame war - so as to deny a clear and heartfelt acceptance of our naked living being.

Moral coercion feeds a libertarian reaction. Guilt is the driving force of morality - for the innocence of our being does not seek to justify or validate itself. But nor is it defined in reaction against such cultural impositions.

To do something because it is the true desire and movement of our being, does not bring with it the associated overhead of conflicted self - or its reflection as a conflicted experience of our world.

This is true charity - because this is the gift of our true presence into our relations. When our presence is witheld we deprive ourselves and others - and yet look out as if it is denied us by others and our world.

Charity begins at home. If we do not truly let love into our lives - we will not have it and be it in our relations. A deep self acceptance is not a justification slip for doing what you do not really want! This issue is the most important in all else that ever occurs because it is foundation for what comes next. Self-rejection - no matter how disguised - will not bring a better world for 'others' or ourselves. Love knows what thinking alone can only hide.

Controversy is a sport. But one doesn't have to play it.