in response to the themes in:
Koch’s postulates indirectly established that the purported microorganisms in the pleomorphic cycle do not cause tissue damage, health deterioration, and death.
At the same time, no one wants to discuss the ways in which the alleged pleomorphic cycle microorganisms have been established as the body’s sanitation teams.
What indisputable evidence is there for this, considering that Koch’s Postulates proved nothing about any supposed beneficial role of the so-called microorganisms in the pleomorphic cycle?
What indisputable evidence is there that the so-called microorganisms of the pleomorphic cycle are actively involved in the processes of neutralization and elimination of toxins, metabolic wastes and tissue residues?
What irrefutable evidence is there that the body can only detoxify, purify and regenerate itself with the help of the so-called microorganisms of the pleomorphic cycle?
What irrefutable evidence is there that the structures described in the Pleomorphic Cycle of Microorganisms…are really living microorganisms that have metabolism and functions?
Do so-called microbiologists have incontrovertible evidence that the supposed microorganisms in the pleomorphic cycle are alive?
Do the so-called microbiologists have indisputable evidence that the supposed microorganisms in the pleomorphic cycle have their own metabolism and specific functions… or, rather, are these statements also nothing more than assumptions made based on interpretations of so-called indirect evidence?
I like the freedom to question assumed reality.
But setting such impossible bars for response, sets its own ivory tower.
Assimilation /elimination is the rhythmic cycles of life.
If the will, urge, desire, purpose of Life is 'blocked' or set into conflicts that effectively block function, then life works around as well as adaptive measures.
As there are some who heal from seemingly 'un-survivable' extremities of toxicity/imbalance, there are clearly more 'pathways' to healing than our mapping minds are aware of or falsely set into.
As I see Psychic as including much that we discard or deny from what we hold conscious, I notice it is reframed as various projected ideas - such as viruses, cells or genes. That can be mutually agreed as reinforcements to a physically defined and determined life and world - even if otherwise taking exclusively polarised positions within their framing.
When is a toxin a trigger for growth?
Under the groomed modern thinking, never.
Rigid or locked down beliefs arise from experience, but we have both individual AND collective frameworks of meaning & development from our own experience.
The lockdown or setting of object-meanings is part of our physical-temporal linearity (inherent to such experience), but its development of self/world is at cost of Soul-awareness - which is timeless - or outside the capacity of translation to a 3D object 'reality-modelling' in image, thought and experience - excepting in part, and in distortions that render a false, fragmented or even reversed 'result' - in which to hold the focus of self-struggle as its own medium of growth, for its own exploration via experience.
Whatever 'particles' may be posited or believed to be self-existing, I hold that 'particular' field interference patterns are in fact presenting. These can be a personal or group 'bubble-effect' or a more integrated & stable framework for the support of life.
PS - the postulates assigned Koch's name are simple logical principles. Koch was not a principled scientist!
The evidences of observation of life as distinct from analyses of in vitro or in silico 'experiment' hold more merit. Observation is not a mechanical fact. We participate in our result.
PPS - Life is not ultimately or truly in the particle but in the waters that the particle interacts within. These waters are universal as a medium of energy & information. Seeds and some forms of creature can likewise seem lifeless until energetic conditions through the water emerge alive. Rather than reduce all to matter - machine, extend Life to the material frameworks of support for life.
