Shock, disgust and anger

Life in a Modern-day Debt Colony: The Truth about Greece
by Michael Nevradakis



I recommend at least considering the article linked above for a perspective on Greece, the EU and a masked agenda that is working by design - and not one of encountering accidents or errors of negligence.


My input is into the article and shared commentary but placed it in the context of the last few words of  elentis who ended his post with:

...We must dare to finally speak the UnSpeakable and do this loudly and backed up by research. At least our fellow Europeans, the majority not in the feeding trough, deserve clear and true information. Believe me, the result of this information is disgust. Shock and disgust – and anger.

My comment:

"Shock and disgust – and anger".

These feelings are unlidded (within us) by events. All of us carry the lid of social civility that generates a mask of personae under which is the attempt to coerce outcomes in alignment with (at least temporarily) escaping or delaying the shock of a broken identity in self and world; the disgust of (and at) the hatred that is thus exposed in the raw, and the survival sense that denies and projects hatred to instead focus almost exclusively in a relative self-righteous justifiction - in which hate of OTHER is seen as absolutely justified and therefore replaces the love that is denied within the hurtred of hate and rage. And so we 'love' to hate and hate to love - for hate has made of love a victim - an invalidity - an un-reality.

I have attempted to sketch something of the imprinting of the human conditioning that 'sets' the human condition unless we feel through it to an expanded acceptance of embrace and perspective.

The hate that embodies an anti-Life globalism, hates the Life that - in its experience - failed it. There are different facets of separation trauma - but we all share in and embody such archetypes that are locked in polarized conflict of 'divide to rule' or indeed to rule out what we cannot bear or tolerate.

There can be no relationship or communication to a mind exclusively identified in vengeance or in terror. But only what is believed to be necessary and justified deceit and coercion - in the framing of the goal of power from which all else derives whatever use or meaning it is allowed to have. Power operates a false sense of protection - or rather a protection of an incomplete sense of self falsely asserted as an exclusive and authoritative power over its own experience.

And so terrorism - whether masked or in the raw, operates the act of the hate upon its own - as a coercive conformity to asserted and imposed 'idea' under which, the living will - the freedom to feel and move as one's being - is sacrificed and denied. The illusion of power 'paints itself into a corner' as checkmate! But the board is a two dimensional representation of a polarized oppositional identity.

If the illusion of power is unsurprisingly self-defeating - does it not invoke curiosity as to the true nature of power - or perhaps there is no term for it in a world so long entrained and enchained to darkness in which NOT being hit can seem like love.

When our hated, feared or denied feeling finds acceptance in the movement of its being - without being given reactive access to trigger harm to self and others, then a fresh take can replace a mis-take and a quality of compassion within ourselves can automatically and naturally recognize opportunities and willingness for communication and relationship hitherto unseen or discarded - in which the power of true presence is extended and honoured in place of a 'relational usury' that seeks to 'get validation from others' by offering a false presentation as substitute for the power it believes lost - and so does not rest in and share.

The inner recognition is not a strategy or replacement for integrity in relationship - but a questioning and opening of foundations so as to truly know and align in purpose - rather than be-guiled within evasions that feel justifiably compelling and necessary.

Is not tragi-comedy a gift of cultural inheritance from early Greek culture? Using the reflection to uncover recognition in which what seemed exclusive polarities are both owned - and instead of an overwhelm, we open the freedom to focus differently - to accept a different choice than a split compulsion.

How anything 'works out' is beyond me - excepting that what I write here has relevance to living a good step - from which a fresh perspective opens its own good or recognized guidance. This is so 'different' as to seem too difficult or indeed daft. But questioning our foundations in desire for true being is not in order to get a better handle on power and protection in the frame of the 'world' - but to receive and thus bring forth a 'different' world from what separation trauma painted and defended as our life.

Illuminating the 'checkmate' of a 'victory' by which life is made hollow and meaningless is part of growing willingness and desire for Life and for truth that is truly receptive and not pre-loaded with demands and conditions.

Our original nature can be covered over and denied - yet must first BE that denial can seem to operate a replacement. Denial is a part of focusing - but we do not have to hate or demonize the choice that does not resonate with who we truly feel and know or even prefer ourself to be - in order to live that freedom and learn of it freely. A coerced or conformed choice is no freedom to feel and learn and grow. The old world order replicates itself over and again as the dictate of a seeming 'separate' mentality - presented as if normal and self-evident - yet predicated on hate and fear and locked in by guilt.

I have only the English translation of the adaptation of Arnisi - used by Theodorakis in Sto Periagiali - I sign off with it in solidarity with and gratitude for an awakening Humanity.

Sto Periagli (Mikis Theodorakis) Based on (Arnisi) DENIAL by Giorgos Seferis

On the secret seashore, white like a pigeon (dove?),
we thirsted at noon, but the water was brackish.
On the golden sand, we wrote her name, but the sea-breeze blew and the writing vanished.
With what spirit, what heart, what desire and passion we lived our life:
a mistake! So we changed our life

[English trans : Edmund Keeley and Phillip Sherrard]

- - -

Richard Le Sarcophage wrote in a comment to the main article

I’m sorry, but the Stasi were there to protect East Germans from the horrors inflicted on Greece.

My reply:

I feel you are mistaken. The apparatus of Soviet state control - extending to making everyone a spy on everyone else - may have been initially 'justified' in terms of protecting against foreign terror threat - but operated to consolidate a power elite who masked in a 'collectivist' appeal at expense of the quality of Life shared - excepting of course, within the conformity of the official dictate.

The identifiction of 'sides' is unaware that deceit works both or all sides of opportune or manufactured conflict to influence outcomes in its favour, without seeming to play much part - except perhaps as saviour.

 I am not suggesting that protection is not required against deceits that carry heavy consequence - but that the very quick minded position themselves 'upstream' of events so as to operate 'insider' leverage by which they become defacto 'elites' making the decisions that frame 'the lives of others' who have little or no awareness of what is in fact going on beneath appearances - excepting they feel denied of their core humanity by a tyrannous dictate - but induced to blame and inflame their own divisions.

Likewise western 'intelligence' gathering is used for corporate/political advantage in globalist power struggle even though it was ostensibly to protect against the 'bad guys'. Corporate or mercantile power tends to be one foot (or many) in front of the attempt to check and balance it - but it is the consolidation of power that operates - for when transnational corporations have served their nation-destroying role, they too will be relived of any temptation towards undue influence or threat to the power dictate.

However, without the belief in the evil enemy - such society cannot remain ordered - for the inner conflicted purposes that are 'unified and displaced' by the dictate of centralised power rise up as a creative chaos through which a different way of living starts to come into focus than coercion and deceit.

However, I note that the terror that external power was supposed to hide or protect us from is leaking out everywhere now - so a 'creative chaos' might be the only option left. The creative is of course what we bring as presence to that which we find disturbing or unsettling. If we only fixate in anti-evil identities we let ourselves be defined over and against the thing we hate. Defined by hate is not creative freedom - even if ingeniously marketed and spun to a fear of change.

Can the secret mind explain its existence?

Secrets of the Mind: Can science explain consciousness?
From iai.tv

My comment:

Can anything 'explain' consciousness?

The seeming question is a conceptual statement positing a something that acts to define and account for prior awareness in terms of concept that it manufactures. This is circular reasoning or indeed talking to oneself as if one is not in fact oneself but a proxy conceptual supposition through which a self reflecting model can be experienced as a modification of consciousness that is  in no way shape or form actually achieving  or acting anything outside of consciousness.
However as a working model, awareness is focused within and through concept of self and that which is rejected by the selection within totality operates as unconscious oppositional sense of identity and will.
The apparent struggle within what seems a split mind results in a world of experience in which imposition and opposition reinforce each other while assertion of control defines itself ever more negatively against feared or denied and unrecognized self. And that assertion of denial is received and reflected as oppression, compression and death - the inability to experience movement within consciousness. Which is the counterpart shadow to a falsely presumed ability to operate as an autonomous and self-defined concept within a totality of what consciousness actually is. The error is the idea of consciousness distinct and outside of feeling - a non feeling mind. Disconnecting thinking.

Feeling - in its true sense - does not need to explain or analyze anything to know That it is as it is, and experience itself in and as ever new perspective - because feeling in its true sense is the primary quality of receptivity that attracts and forms a focusing of attention and desire within itself, that then extends to reflect as idea through which to know itself Life - in relationship - as movement - as creation.

What is defined and accepted as consciousness in general human terms is an inverted exclusion of creation - in which an effect, assigns itself cause - as its own creation and consequently asserts an interpretation as its own distorted and filtered experience as its mind and its determination of world outside its defined 'consciousness'.

An interesting reversal of the reversal would be to ask, "Can Consciousness explain science?" Although the term explain is not native to Consciousness and so its original term would be, "Can Consciousness illuminate, embrace and know, science?". I suggest that nothing that is but is at its Original Quality of being, unconditionally loved - that is, illuminated, embraced and intimately known.
What kind of science would be conducted in conscious acceptance and embrace of the Movement of Being - rather than as an arrogant ignorance that seeks to make of Life a slave?

If words are not felt - they are not connecting to anything but thought. The assertion that they find justification in application is a cover for persistence in denying the felt quality of Existence. Heart and Mind are in truth an indivisible magnetic/electric vibrational expression of Infinite Perspective. A temporary shielding of totality individualizes the One as the Many - but the Many are the One.
At the perspective of individuality Idea accepted and extended through, reflects experience. There is no separation in true creation of idea (or definition) and experience - and the knowing within experience of self-awareness 'that it is Good' or truly reflecting. But in concept of a separating and segregating sense of self is a fragmenting experience in which the conscious focus within such act is lost to the overwhelming experience of being defined and conditioned by ones own unrecognized act in concept. The residual attempt of the mind to judge, determine and create for itself operates an exclusion zone, an elitism of private agenda operating beneath many layers of defence and justification.
It victory over Life is of course death. The reduction of life to explanation is the suppression of the very Movement of Life unless operating within a truly heartfelt, passionate and self transcending movement of Life!
Consciousness: By their fruits shall you know them - and they shall know themselves.

The sickness in the Human Psyche

Understanding The Sickness of the American Psyche

(an article that attempts to find some perspective to address increasing disorder in the USA (and its global relationships)

I applaud and appreciate GreenMedInfo I feel so much that is natural and good has been and is being falsely denied while so much that is destructive to us is asserted and promoted through trojan horse channels of apparent authority.
I don't talk to the American psyche - but I always talk of the consciousness - but perhaps not emphasising the feeling dimension enough - without which a split off mental isolation dreams while the true feeling is denied healing and fuels a negative agenda...

- - -

The suppression of the feeling being  - of the will itself, by a mind that identified in self concept - in fixed, assertive authoritative control that covers its own denied guilt-fears, operates a root pattern of sickness. For the will is not causative but reflective and responsive - and its reflection of being persistently denied is of course rage - regardless the reflected guilt in the will seeks to pushit down and absorb it and dump it. The minds interpretation of the will as weak, oppositional, depraved, untrustworthy is a blame dump for the definitional foundation that does not and can not accept - honestly accept its own feelings and let them know acceptance. This quality of real communication opens true and relevant insight and reestablishes relationship as the beginning of restoring trust.
Unless we recognize this need in our own self-healing and give it priority - we will persist the pattern of denying more and more of who we truly and livingly are - whether apparently negative or positive - to a concept of self and life that is destructive to life.

I'm not talking about mental ideas - but the original imprint of terrorism by which minds are split and all attempt to fix it from the false foundation fragments further.
We need to be safe with that we feel what we feel - and Feel It fully or undefendedly, yet within a healing intent and being as safe as we know how with emotion that we fear, will take us out of control. One CAN transform feelings from within their own movement. Which means NOT rationalizing them or forcing them in any way - so that what is locked - the part of you that was locked up in it - is released and restored you.
It is a tall order - but letting guilt or shadow power drive an agenda that is killing us - and our Planet is bringing it all up anyway. It can be seen as a healing crisis - and I do focus in the wholeness for a well being to replace sickness - but the underlying denials are  in a sense, no longer deniable.
The simple answer is that hidden guilt is a sickness and death inducing frame of reference - but the fact is that it is so well hidden in what seems to protect us that it thinks for us more than we might imagine. the guilt is not THEM though THEY may resonate with and raise it to awareness.

And of course use common sense until something better comes up to replace it. the 'surface reality' is disintegrating/splitting further. We each make our choices - but in mutually reinforced 'realities' we know not what we do. I feel to illuminate something the world doesn't want to look at - but which I believe is the most pressing need - and this is to pause of our self-thinking and recognize our shadow - own it - acknowledge it - feel the feeling of what is kept away enough to also recognize it holds a call for healing. If that much is felt then you have a homing beacon that may not make you feel better at first or maybe for some time - but you will FEEL, better - and you will also feel the vibrational quality of Life that is not mere mental substitution and sickness management.

And if this doesn't resonate you - then be as aligned in your integrity as you have capacity to be. If sickness is not to use and abuse you.

The quality of God that is Light that heals cannot shine into that which is actively denied. It isn't the smiley that needs it - its is that which we dare not face -- so much so that face looks OUT and thinking blocks the view within. We have vast resources through a quality of balanced communication of heart and mind, body and Spirit, but the interjection of guilt-thinking is a confusion of deceit that we can become vigilant against - and put it behind us as invocation of true presence.
Asserted coercive mind has had its day - it will take the Planet with it if it can. All in the name of righteousness and protection.

is it a crying shame?

A Guardian article on tears, emotion and control...

Andy Murray's tears are hard to watch

The Wimbledon champion turned to his dog for comfort in last week's documentary when recalling his terrible childhood experience in the Dunblane massacre. But I had to turn away...

 Comment:

Another term for Soul is 'Feeling'. We are primarily a feeling awareness.
But the displacement and denial of feeling is in emotional reactivity - which is a mental assertion that overrides Feeling. This may manifest as emotion or as a lack of emotion - but always as a dramatic mental strategy to hide or deny wholeness or honesty.

I notice and can feel the difference between tears that are the fully allowed Feeling, flowing - and those crocodile tears that are the 'poor me' - however dramatically expressed. We can also hear the difference in others, if we are not hooked into power struggle with them.

True control is not applied or asserted upon oneself but is a harmony of oneself.
To yield to a greater love is to trust beyond one's own strategic capacities - indeed it relinquishes them in order to know peace. That doesn't mean the we don't know how to be appropriate for life is not a disconnected inadequacy to relate.

Shame is associated with loss of control, yet an asserted or imposed control is illegitimate and self undermining or dis-integrating. Often an apparent breakdown allows a reconnection of more honesty.

Social mores and taboos express mutual agreements to protect the separate self interests of those who seem to separate from Soul, and thus suffer the mortal conditioning. But events in our life can rip all curtains aside and initiate a reintegration from an awakened honesty.

Manipulation is the expertise of the mind in its story. We all know how to play it and forget it is a game - as if becoming the mask.

The uncovering of our living truth to our awareness is a deeply moving experience, whether it comes in nice or nasty packaging.
Re-learning our nature is a yielding to a greater power and intelligence that is not ultimately outside our true being - but is outside our mind and world of personal control.

Yet while we assert and exercise the WISH for personal control, we cannot discern the basis for such a trust. Personal control locks the mind into a closed system from which it cannot escape. But one can release such a wish the instant one sees it is a false foundation that robs us of our true life.