Sunday, 29 March 2015


Why were prehistoric animals so huge?

It was late, I was new browsing and came upon this science promo article.
I started writing about gravity...

- - -

Gravity taxes land animals. It made a huge difference to me as I grew from a child to adult hood.  Perhaps gravity was significantly less when gigantic creatures lived.
Perhaps time and space are also not as fixed and rigid as we have come to believe.
Perhaps "millions of years" operate as a distancing symbol from the Creative - from That agency or power of expression that creates the past within the Instant of always as part of an unfolding of experience within infinity.
Why is gravity so incredibly weak in relation to all other known forces - and yet the strongest within our experience of human embodiment.
Perhaps science will grow beyond a gravity based model of that renders the Living Universe into dead terms?
Consciousness is infinitely beyond the range of the physical and isn't subject to gravity unless it takes itself seriously and crystalizes in-form-ation by focussing within contraction and density as a protective gesture around the idea of non-existence, self-doubt, threat and otherness. That is to create virtual minds or nodes of focusing experience within itself - each with its virtual world experience.
Why not! would answer many questions of actuality. Obviously, Life does because it can - and in some sense desires. The focus of attention indicates value given, and that value is desire embodied. If a pattern of focus establishes itself, and identification arises within it - not that there is ANYTHING separate from the Consciousness act that IS such experience.
Separateness from Life is a human exploration in concept, fleshed out in experience. But such separation - if possible or conceivable - would be non-existence or indeed death. Whether non-existence exists or has any being is a meaningless oxymoron. But as an idea taken seriously, it presents a polarity within Life by which an oppositional force can seem to operate. The electric Universe is a communication and interplay of polarities within ... the Only Existence that knows itself infinitely reflected in all that is. You the reader know your existence reflected in experience. Are you in fact alone? Or is that a temporary condition arising from the filtering and limiting of Infinite Communication by means of a personality construct - not merely individually - but as a Planetary Consciousness within a Galactic Consciousness?
The game of blind man's bluff can pin the donkey's tail wherever it will - but when the blindfold is removed, there is cause for laughter.
"Why" questions are usually statements or assertions disguised as questions.
Why are we here?, presumes 'we' and much of what is meant by 'here'.
Why are you focusing on what you are noticing yourself focusing upon right now? Is the answer really in terms of the past? Or is it the current choice knowingly or unknowingly running as to what you give value to and therefore notice. I say what you give value to - but one's self definition generally cascades a set of values that then pertain to the themes that both express and embody that particular template idea.
Why is my somewhat off topic post so HUGE? Well, I am enjoying myself - or rather an unfolding joy of idea has embodied as this writing through reflecting on "Millions of years", gravity and embodiment or manifestation itself. It simply ran its course and asks nothing of anyone nor seeks persuasion or to elicit agreement.
Thinking outside the box is unboxed thinking of a willingness to recognize resonance and relevance to what is true of me, To reopen channels of inspirational communication that no longer require jamming so as to operate in the dark in apparent independence and self-seriousness. Humans are not a blight on the planet; human thinking is an error from which the rogue growth operates at the expense of its host instead of aligning as integrally part of it.
Perhaps another Civilisation in a probable future - or indeed looking on - might ask, "why were humans so hugely self-limiting?" and the answer is because we mistook it for life, for self, for freedom and power and worshipped the 'rationality' by which we justified our denial of true nature for a sense of control amidst threat that is generated by asserting a sense of control and meeting our own reflection.
One can only expand a model so far before the foundations have to be revised. Clinging to an obsolete idea is to miss the mark for all around is changed and we still think we know what is going on in terms of a past that is not here.
New Idea is more than a remake of an old movie with better cgi. It is the fruit of a true relationship lived. What you give out is what you get back.

Is the sky falling?

This op-ed news article prompted this commentary:

The device of deceit by which consciousness 'fragments itself' is of many shifting levels masked by personae.
At the level of the personae an unfolding drama of the grasp for power, by a fear of powerlessness, is thus compelled to coerce in order to persist or 'survive' by getting or taking from others and from Life, that which it believes itself deprived of or specially deserving.

This 'worldly power' operates in cycles that essentially consolidate power, but at the expense of integrity and therefore functionality. Over-controlling life renders it uncontrollable, for suppressed symptoms merely arise everywhere and escalate the believed need for such control at the expense of communication.

Control mentality operates in isolation of separate self interest and while pursuing a sense of special self-interest, can only manipulate via 'incentive' that are negatively predicated - either directly as in fear of consequence or indirectly in seducing dependence within artificially induced scarcity.

I write about nothing BUT consciousness responsibility - for I see this as our next step - our awakening to the acts of definition within consciousness whereby we accept and trade a false sense of self and life and purpose.

I am not suggesting changing consciousness IN ORDER to change the world, but aligning consciousness truly in order to be the change we wanted the world to deliver.

Communicating the perspective of consciousness is difficult when the existing paradigm collectively has the map upside down. One literally has to freely yield one's thinking to connect with Wholeness... with and as Consciousness.

Thinking 'says' this wont make any difference.
Thinking says all kinds of things - but until the predication upon guilt and fear is significantly undone, thinking operates a scam - of sorts - for the attempt to hide FROM fear and to hide IN fear GIVES POWER AWAY.
BUT - what is true of you is not lost and doesn't need to be reclaimed or 'taken back' so much as RECOGNIZED.

Everything is a matter of perspective, and Consciousness ITSELF is the capacity to shift perspective and behold everything within a fresh 'take' rather than a 'mis' take.

However the engagement or preoccupation with trying to change the world first in order to then 'arrive' is a block to shifting perspective and simply locks one into a pattern of limitation and conflict from which there is no escape WITHOUT shifting perspective to where escape is no longer a meaningful necessity.
One doesn't 'escape' oneself - or any facet of oneself - but one does choose where to bring one's focus of attention within All That Is.
Focussing on the negative as if to get a positive result is a mistaken and futile self-deception - even if a few billion reinforce each other in the attempt.
Re-integrative consciousness is not trying to fix Humpty Dumpty under the King's orders but embracing the healing of one's own consciousness so as to in effect withdraw support for the 'botnet of fear' and align in true - joyous - purpose. Then one may speak true to the mind that is identified within un-owned fear. But otherwise the blind lead the blind - and of course all with conflicting agendas attempting to manipulate outcome.
Coercion is NOT the way of communication, honouring relationship or integrity and so truth is its first casualty. But that doesn't mean truth isn't true, it simply means it is temporarily denied witness.

Scientific prostitution to corporate coercion

Real Tragedy of 'Science': Public Faith Declines as Fakery Grows

A Daily Bell article on false peer reviews uncovered in scientific prostitution to corporate coercion.

- - -

A Consciousness Perspective:

Identity theft is nothing new. Truth is not 'out there'. Insofar as anything true is 'out there' it is recognized through one's own truth.

As Consciousness is accepted as our Ground Reality there will be no need to manufacture or employ 'truths' as weapons of leverage and control because truth will be self-evident and beyond question or conflict.

In the mean 'minded' while, any form of anything is meaningless (or means anything and nothing) because the meanings given to things reflect a false or conflicting identification as the 'doer' or 'controller' of consciousness. This is self-illusion or vanity of ignorance and arrogance. Nothing worthy or sane can come of it save the recognition and release of what we are NOT.

Science predicated upon materialism already asserts metaphysical notions that filter and distort receptivity to truth. Of course many notions operate true within their specific range of focus and provide frameworks of intervention into existing patterns of relationship. When enough people agree, their mutually reinforcing definitions operate as currency regardless whether they share true value or pass off toxic debt in place of true worth.

"I" me and "self' are shorthand symbols for facets of the operation of will, but when will is usurped by conditioned belief, it operates the illusion of freedom under the tyranny of fear. What is given power to, becomes power over the giver, because it is asserted and believed true.
Hiding a lie or hiding in a lie may be 'justified' by the narrative of the liar - such as not publicizing information that reflects badly on one's institution and thus give ammunition to the perceived 'heretics' who must at all cost be prevented from gaining influence. But that has nothing to do with science as a discipline of uncovering the (already) true. It is simply the idea of war upon the hated self.

The egocentricity of the segregative or separating self is implicit in the use of the term self, in most usage. But corruption operates upon something true or it would have no meaning as corruption. Corruption begins with taking self-image over true relation and protecting it at cost of truth. It operates a mask or deceit by which NOT to know what in fact one knows. It splits the mind. It plays apart as if oppositional and separate, and seeks the validation that only real relationship offers by joining in forms that mimic aspects of unity without actually joining or relating with anything beyond its own strategy.

Recognizing 'out-of-true' is the opportunity to true up. NOW. Blame operates to divert from truing up, punishment to forbid it - save through long diversionary 'processes of change' that effectively kick real change into long grass while engaging hypocrisy (acting). Tyranny is first within the mind of refusal to embrace and embody change (life). Freedom is an inside job - an 'in-place' shift of perception and perspective that uncovers an already freedom which had been 'given away' to a dream of power and self-specialness. But freedom cannot truly 'leave you' at the level of your true nature - though one can actively deny it in assertion of imagined right to override true nature. We are free to war within ourself if we want, while it gives us something we believe we need or want enough to pay the price.

The baby in the bathwater is the uncorrupted service of science to true uncovering of Who we are and what Life Is. Because one begins from a false foundation there is a necessary revisionary shifting as a greater perspective illuminates the error of one's starting place. However, the inspirational movement to follow one's joy of discovery and gifting of talent in service of life is itself pure - even if imperfectly appreciated within the framework of egocentric identity and drives.