Reversal Engineers?

 A reflection that rose from reading someone state:

"No one understands how inheritance works".

in a comment on https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review/

The wish or belief that it 'works' as a mechanism - that can be hacked to private gain is a large part of the block to awareness of the way of life.

Rupert Sheldrake talks of 'habits' not just of our surface perceptions and responses, but as a basis of a 'Universe'. or at least of an unfolding experience of Universe in time and place.

Our current media is used to programme expectation as a mass event. Is it possible NOT to reflect the society? IE: if manipulative mind-control seems to be used to socially engineer identity, is that 'manipulative' a wave or a particular?

We have a propensity to object modelling under the illusion of control as impactful or significant by effect on other and world. But the Field or Terrain is generally discarded for the illusion to maintain continuity or a temporal stream of acquired and inherited traits and themes.

The Bible had the idea of true inheritance - each according to its kind and like from like. Father/Son being its core Creation - or which all else shares in. It also has the idea of the lie and the father of it - which is a wish the lie be true that generates a past to support it.

I'm not saying I understand how anything works but your statement attracted my interest so thankyou for that.
A fractal holographic sense of 'order' within apparent chaos opens the realm of recognising the whole in the parts instead of trying to put Humpty together again.
 

Out of our box?

 (To a sceptical comment on near death experience accounts)
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review/

There is a reason people believe images  or even experiences are in their head - including the image of their head. Imagination is of infinite probabilities. The lockdown to and distancing of mind in the body is the domain of a self-specialness set in mythic terms as the basis for exploring experience of private authoritative will,  set in separation and conflict, bounded or limited by its own predicate.
The belief or myth of life IN bodies is thus the effective denial of the Field Awareness that underlies the masking of a mapped out identity in polarised reaction.
The proprioception of our body is where an object is made intimate and special to a sensory focus we might call a nervous system (or an etheric body).
The ways we map or translate inner qualities of a felt awareness to object or 3D model of time and place  (and therefore ability to verbalise or represent in image) are unique and varied, even if drawing on common cultural themes and a presumed objective realm of fact. So NDE pr OBE may reveal such underlying personal & cultural belief systems. The same experience for a believer there can be no awareness outside the body but of objects to a fixed awareness located in it, would be as a completely unrecalled dream. Not unlike the idea of the 'Men in Black' erasing any aspect of reality that would disclose what the mind is at that time unwilling and unready to see. Instead of seeing that as being denied by Them, can it be that we are each in the gift of our own unfolding experience, and that spoilers are kept out (unless of course as a means to leak what you are to what you thought you were as part of your life but seeming as if to break its continuity and open new growth).

A practical question to pose here is related to 'contagion' and or 'inheritance' at their root; are we each setting the creative focus of filters & rules by which to generate our own version of a co-creative experience of a whole that cannot be objectified or subjected but through a mind set of its own division as be-lived real? Clearly we do generate our own version of reality and react to it as real.
I sense  reality is more of a resonant coherence of wholeness, while our identified worldview is of rules and filters for reinforcement of the currently active focus or set of definitions and beliefs. That this operates from long before the development of self-reflective thinking is to recognise memory as an energetic record in the field that informs the body. Access to the record can then be limited or masked by rules of permission - such as to protect a post traumatic fear from running unchecked. Yet these rules are of the trauma as an unconscious highly active 'guardian or guard' - depending on perspective.
Temporary expansions of perspective can reveal a whole and a holiness of existence that cannot be retained or integrated in our consciousness, but cannot be entirely denied or forgotten, and so open a point outside the believed self/world from which to question it, and thus open to transformation of purpose by which the 'same data' is seen differently.
Breakdown of Communication as a conflicted perspective masked in and defended against a true Embrace of functional correction?