“ISIS attacked Brussels? The US created ISIS? Therefore?”
I notice that a war on Is operates a false narrative. That Is Is is undeniable but the false association of Is with something that is NOT - allows the idea of opposition to deny Is Is while believing it is denying that which denies Is.
That was a meandering prelude in wordplay to this writing on the nature of a split-screen reality and the loss of traction for fixation in its framework:
If the economic union of EU was expected and intended to result in a chaos - that would then coerce a political union - and consolidation of power in a technocracy wielded by shadow power, then perhaps the martial law raised around a 'Gladio-2' - and the weaponising of forced migration all 'make sense' to breakdown as a prelude to the open dictate of NWdO. Whatever 'plans' or confusions are afoot - the destabilising of Everything is unfolding as events within which we each choose our own perspective. Or sacrifice the power to choose to loveless image.
The lust for power, the fear of chaos that calls on 'control', the increase in latent disorder as a result of 'controlling', all polarize the many into a tighter knot of frightened fish for predators to feast upon. The use of terror to trigger imprinting and effectively 'control' goes back to primal imprinting before thought grew to establish consciousness.
It also triggers rage into breaking out that was also - like terror - heavily suppressed beneath a 'control' consciousness. Rage is a lust for power for it hates what is - as far as its sense of burned out receptivity allows any sense of relationship to Life to connect to anything present - and seeks to remake it in its own image - which is an image of hatred born of terror.
The rage-driven align under cold 'power' to deny their terror to awareness, and the terror-imprinted hide from power by guilt-inhibiting rage from moving. Rage given to hate operates as a denial of movement of Will - excepting to lure it to be killed or subverted to a will-less-ness of power devoid of feeling Life.
Refusing to give power to hate allows feeling to move without being channelled or triggered into hateful act. Only in feelings moving can we reclaim our Life from a power trip that splits consciousness from a natural awareness into a 'control-mentality' that seeks power upon the sacrifice of its own Life. Fear is an evacuating movement - finding ways to stay in a willingness for heart - evacuates what is hateful. Guilt is hateful - but without feeling-awareness of its device, guilt will direct your thinking as if your protector. It protects only itself from exposure through conflict that shuts down your capacity to be still and know - to true receptivity and expression.
It is I that is transformed by stepping out from ancient conditionings - and that I is of a perspective that is not set in terror by rage - to replicate its pattern over and over again. I have no 'control' over Life but I have relational communication within it through an inner honesty and openness of feeling awareness that I now know not to deny, dismiss, invalidate or rationally redefine as 'dominion over'. For what we embody reflects back at us - and the attempt to force reality is to invite insanity to take its place.
When it came out, I watched 24 - Series 1 for a few episodes - but when the same plot was recycled and the only point of it was to induce anxiety-fixated attention disorder! So I simply left a split screen story and got my Day back. Perhaps it isn't the 'end of the world' so much as the end of any capacity or interest in following an insanity framed at expense of living this Day - in Its own terms - that is as unfolds out of a natural inclination to an integrated sense of being - in which feeling and knowing are a depth and richness of communication rather than artificially contrived to block or screen off such relationship in narrative diversion.
Perhaps there are those who want to take it deeper into darkness - but if they represent a choice that is not mine then they serve a clarity in my own. Reading symbolically is part of recognizing your own creative imagination - but this can be well hidden in a split-screen presentation in which you seem to be but one of the characters in one of the frames and not the versions of everyone else that you also made when you called up your 'self' to save you from what you did not recognize and so denied acceptance of.
Looking Within - is really simply the allowing of Presence to notice - rather than fixating away in split-screen 'control' sufferance. For the justifiction of hate is the entry ticket to the 'separation' experience. However, the experience of crucifiction is as real as the hatred of the thoughts that know not what they do - regardless WHAT they seem to do. Are there rogue 'thoughts' in your mind that have power over your willingness to accept them? Are these 'compulsions' running on power you gave them un-knowing? Was a desire to explore a sense of power not part of calling forth such framework within which to have the experience - and maintain its reinforcement and continuity as a rich and dense feeling of reality?
I am aware we are on the cusp of Easter. Don't let a Good Story go to waste on anyone else's narrative interpretation - when you have your own Native Imagination aligned exquisitely to the core signature vibrational presence of your being.
The idea of death can be seen from many perspectives in a split-screen world - but it can also serve a shift of perspective while embodied in the focus of physical experience. If illusions don't kill you then it is the illusions that have to fall away. All illusions are imaginable and experiencable at some level - but only those that align with your true being can be freely engaged in without oppositional distortions in which attack and disconnection take on malevolence and fear in misidentified guilt.
The Mind is Projector regardless what is given focus. To be awake is to be on purpose. The world of split-screen reality is designed to help you forget your purpose in conflicted self. To forget your self in conflicted purpose. When the cause and effect are not two - you know your fulfilment as the very movement of communication within relationship. To look for fulfilment in the never never is to overlook it in the Now. How does this moment embody an unfolding fulfilment? Maybe start off by not hating and denying it the right to be here as a reflection or feedback that can be read in different ways than a fixed judgement asserts and insists. Why do we hate ourself above all else - but hide it so craftily? Because it once served a purpose that is not alive in me now. To release from service is not the same as hatred and denial.
You can imagine a different future from the imprinting of the past - though the same pattern can mutate endlessly as if 'you' can escape a while, or win awhile. Instead of a fleeting moment in which presence can never unfold and flower, but to be sacrificed to a past imprinting a future like itself. Wake to presence in which the re-cycle of hate can be truly felt. Vengeance is not healing. Beware of the seduction of a false investment.
Only the 'switching' of operating systems will constitute the change of heart in which the disconnecting mind finds no support. And as long as one looks OUT and believes what he or she sees - and says "It will never happen" - indeed Thy Will Is done - but you cannot know it is your Will while hating, denying and masking it in fearful symbol to which you kneel in terror or rage at in impotence.
Spring sounds through the open window - human sounds of activity amidst the calls of birds all somehow carrying the feeling of this particular light - indoors I hear a bath running - a sense of tuning out of this sharing and into the unfolding of this day. Sharing doesn't stop when the focus shifts perspective - but if the mind locks into false association, it identifies defined conditions as the reality - rather than as the vehicle of its communication. It looks for the 'past' and cannot feel what is presencing Itself ever anew.
Showing posts with label war on terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war on terror. Show all posts
Thursday, 24 March 2016
Sunday, 29 November 2015
Exporting Revolution - a Policy of Terror
‘Exporting Revolution’: Zbigniew Brzezinski On Trial At The UN General Assembly
Though never mentioned by name, the shadow of the 87-year-old loomed large over the U.N. General Assembly, with the U.S. and its allies defending or glossing over his quiet strategy of destabilization and the rest of the world’s leaders decrying it as a “policy of terror.”
By Caleb T. Maupin
'Evil' is the shadow of an asserted self righteousness - that then locks onto the perceived evil OUTSIDE itself and attempts to control, deny, enslave or kill it.
It is not enough to see evil OUTSIDE and fight it - as if that in any way is not serving its own agenda under mask of righteousness.
The imprinted beliefs of a 'survivalist identity' amidst terror and threat operate without true consciousness - as if spun off in a private and disconnected sense of Life as THREAT.
The attraction of 'righteous' hating diverts from the embrace of the heart that is thus 'locked out' to a 'mind' that is trapped in, the feelings of hate.
The mind can and does elaborate justifications - justifictions, yes - but written in flesh as pain and loss. Heart and mind are one - and the split mindedness that denies Feeling, is the 'thinking' that is divorced from the very Movement of our being - from Life Itself.
I write to the choice NOT to listen to insane thinking - regardless its apparent justifications - and to Listen in the heart - even and especially when hurting in the hateful. For a greater Acceptance of 'That we are as we are' must precede the freedom to be as we, in truth prefer.
A control mentality is to be dismantled... while operating such check and balance as a fundamental integrity of communication moves in us to be.
S.M. Stirling replies to me:
Dude, life is a threat. It's so threatening that there is a 100% probability of it eventually killing you.
My response to S.M Stirling:
I could see what you wrote as: Life is certain death, but a temporary delay of the inevitable allows that thought to assert itself.
That thought is the belief of the fragmenting and fragmented self/mind.
However, you are free to believe it and HAVE the experience.
When the cuckoo's egg hatches, other chicks are pushed from the nest and the life support system is usurped that was their due.
Likewise when guilt and fear thinking is accepted into the mind it pushes your heart's knowing and true thoughts out and steals your identity - like a phishing attack or a trojan deceit.
Now a 'you' separate from 'life' sees life as a threat - a terror that will surely crush the 'life' out of 'you'.
I suggest there is much more to You that 'you' allows you to know and that life and death are very different from what the 'you' thinking dictates.
If your computer is compromised by security breach so as to become a tool of some agenda that is not your own true will - then clear out the false and re-establish a pristine original system - and maintain full vigilance against deceit.
In short, the definitions and core beliefs by which you identify and live - determine your life. For whatever conditions you meet or unfold as your life - they are those by which you are expressing your core beliefs as to who and what you are - and what the world is.
These are not 'materially fixed' - though they may be very heavily reinforced. Life is also a capacity to open NEW perspective. Whether there is the willingness and desire to Live is another thing - for the guilt-thinking works to block the awareness and feeling of LIFE - towards ensuring a false peace in a loss of capacity to feel and recognize LIFE - instead identifying with the parasitic thinking that kills its host and propagates itself thereby.
Everything changes. Nothing really 'survives' its own instant of appearance - yet there is ... beneath the ever changing, a tangible Spirit or Purpose that can be aligned with and awaken to recognize itself through Creation. The key is; "what you give out, is what you get back". As you are sowing so ARE you reaping. The fact that this does not SEEM true or obvious, is the result of a fragmented mind at war within itself - that "does not know what it does' because it is largely unconscious of its formative and interpretive belief.
Yes Life contains catalyst and challenge and a process of obstructions or adversities that may or may not be transformed or undone. If the ideas you are accepting as true are serving you - use them. Live by them. If they are not - have a clear out to make room for what does serve your joy in Life. And why not?
James Wherry Shelia Sperbeck commented to the main article
Why? Brezinski called it right, when he predicted the invasion of Afghanistan. He correctly organized opposition to it. As a college student in the 1980's, I did put up the posters of the "butterfly bombs" that the Soviets dropped on villages. They were bombs shaped like toys and pens that blew the hands off of children - and that was what they were intended for.
Brezinski's glaring failure underscores my contempt for the Far Left: like all of the other anti-war protesters, he mindlessly turned his back on Vietnam and ignored the human rights abuses that the hate groups who make up the peace movement PROMISED us they would continue to fight against. Har, har, har. Under their watch, 3 million human beings were murdered in the Killing Fields of Cambodia. The only thing comparable was the Rwanda genocide under Bill Clinton.
I felt this response:
The 'opposition' pre dated the Russian invasion - and was designed to lure USSR into their own 'Vietnam'. I thought the death and destruction (and profit thereby), were the intended outcomes of such policy - under guise of this-ism v that-ism.
However, any information or appearance is itself potentially carrying or promoting hidden agenda. The idea of passing off as something else in order to undermine or prevail over is deeply embedded in human consciousness. It used to be called 'the deceiver'. Now it may be called spin, PR or part of full spectrum dominance. That is to control thinking, perception and reaction of the minds of 'others'. I have heard that you cant cheat an honest man - though he may be thankful for the revealing of any residual liability by which he could be triggered. What is honesty here but a congruency of thought, word and deed.
Clever thinking may promise much, but there is also the saying what goes around, comes around - and as you sow, so shall you reap. I don't say these AT you as if you should take them on from me - but with you in willingness to stay awake amidst the liability of being scammed - perhaps by a false sense of ourself that 'others' take advantage of.
Tuesday, 17 November 2015
Who is the enemy here?
Who is the enemy here?
My response:
Everyone already HAS rejected harmony for mind manipulated crazy - albeit redefined as normal. It may be seen that the identity within forms and ideals of love, peace and harmony attempts to hide or deny terror, hate, and rage - where those with an identity within anger, hate and revenge choose to try to actively get rid of, reject or deny the perceived enemy or threat.
Neither is open to communication of a true self-honesty here - or they would recognize their reflections.
I feel LOVE is the capacity and willingness to be with what is true - which is not as the world 'loves' - merely to get an outcome for itself. LOVE's willingness opens a different perspective from the reptilian fight or flight mindset.
From where I stand I see that denied hate, war and chaos (that the war-mind embodies in all its fragmented identities) is 'coming' - or rather is surfacing or rising despite AND BECAUSE OF the 'war on terror' which at its deepest level ,is the attempt to eradicate what is associated with terror so as to 'protect' the capacity to operate as a private power. Which is a deceit by which to operate from shadow power that seems self sufficient yet is really an oppositional and parasitic reaction to the power of Life. Yet in forms that seem rationally justified and self-evident to the mind that is seeks self validation at cost of honesty.
Whether the term 'we the people' actually embodies as a shared sense of LIFE - of truly shared worth - is to be seen. For the manipulation of minds with ideals and concepts is almost complete. Meanwhile the people are like golems, cattle, or lab-rats to those who understand and apply the ways of dominion over the mind.
All the people have to do is redefine themselves as terrorists, radicals or mind-manipulated crazies - and the New Global Order will have the justifiction for imposing itself that it nurtures and has been working toward for centuries.
How much the events in Paris are to be taken at face value is worthy of question. The only way to seek a truer perspective than manipulated reaction is to pause reaction - including thoughts - so as to allow discernment of the movement of being that is resonant with and relevant to the desire fro truth.
Desire for self-validation or righteous vengeance or superior understanding is all oppositional distortion to recognizing who and where you are in this situation.
Finding another way to meet hated chaos than denial and fragmentation might be opening a deeper honesty that the thinking could imagine. But that is why one must pause it to access an evolutionary path from a deeper embrace rather than persist that same exact reptilian primitive scenario over and over and over - through millennia. Generation upon generation.
Modelling love is being real and there are no rules or techniques for being real. Most so-called communication is manipulatory at its core - because our concepts are like our money - operating a negatively defined sense of self concept.
Redeeming our self and our world is exchanging a self-conceit of denial for a true relational willingness. This wont come from any ideas of such conceit - and the 'warriors' defending such 'self' will operate maximally to suppress any true willingness for communication - as they always have. If communication is deemed dangerous, it must be disrupted, suppressed, subverted, obfuscated, demonised, denied and defined in terms that trigger the most negative feelings - so that no one will break out of the conditioning - but would suffer pain of insanity and isolation.
A State of Illegitimacy
binra to EUbrainwashing
I don't see that the State is more than a subverted form-meaning being used as disguised attack on our will - and by that I mean our true and sovereign will - not the version sold and sucked up by negatively defined identity.
So yes - recognize false beliefs and allegiances will fall away from them.
A war against Is - and indeed against the feminine aspect of Isis - is war on our own Life and Existence. As my typo suggested a moment ago - an act of exitance. (Suicide in defiance of Life).
Of course the associations being incepted with IS are terror by design.
If the deceiver can get you to give and live out from hatred, rage and fear, then the Presence of Life will be rendered invisible and intangible amidst the conflict and carnage and resulting order of compression in frozen 'consciousness' of no capacity to actually feel and move, Alive and Whole.
Insofar as organisational structures are given legitimacy to serve purpose they can be corrupted by subverting that purpose. Then it seems as if the corruption is OUTSIDE. But as you say - what goes around comes around - or as I say it - what you give out is what you get back.
The primary power we have is in what we accept true of ourself (in relation to any circumstance or experience) - for what we accept we automatically give or live out from - and becomes the framework of value or measure of our interpreted experience.
In this sense power is at the level of definitional Idea - believed. To accept what is not true of you (and this is for anyone) will be to conflict oneself - and that inevitably incepts the purpose of resolving conflict framed in external terms. Which MUST propagate and maintain conflict as the basis of self - unless and until the original error is revisited and perspective revisioned.
The original error may be described as taking an image of self - or an image of reality and accepting it true IN PLACE of the true and living movement of being that may image itself infinitely and richly in the unfolding of all that it is - but is not locked or frozen in assertion of self-definitions arising from the inherent conflict of identity in self concept.
The tendency is to 'solve the crisis' - and different approaches conflict - whilst sharing this underlying definition. The capacity to feel the crisis as messenger and message from a higher or deeper or more inclusive perspective - that is not to be killed but 'opened and received' despite its most unwelcome insulting and humiliating experience.
Well I (truly) commend you on your willingness and trust that any discovered depth is a measure of your own in-sight and recognition. If you find a way to make the same points in simpler or clearer ways - go for it! There are key factors that operate a reversal in consciousness of a kind we are becoming more able to notice and unmask in our world.
I know it is possible to translate some of this into more accessible accepted idioms - yet that translation almost always operates as a 'new wine into old wine bottles' where the FORMS of insight and recognition are lost to a subtler manipulative ploy that uses them to block and mask its intent. Willingness to bring attention present is a key quality that a deceptive rationalism does not require or desire.
I feel that discernment works different to judgement. The latter censors everything whilst running it through a database of past association and so cannot deal in anything whole or truly present - being locked in the past. But an openness to the whole of what is present allows the heart to feel and tune into the resonance and relevance to what is desired or called forth as the need of the situation.
A tangible sense of 'where something is coming from' is a key to reading it. If something is coming from a place of coercive persuasion, then even if it borrows facts - it is working a hidden agenda. Likewise if we read seeking only reinforcement of an existing hidden personal agenda - we will not let information in - in case it upsets our 'established order'.
The way to navigate and transform obstructive and challenging situations calls for becoming truly present with ALL of what is here - which is a transformative act. Humanity has become very 'lazy' seeking to run on auto or sleep mode while leaving a sort of template to run everything. But as is becoming evident - the moneylenders have usurped the template as the assertion of control and power over needs and the meeting of needs.
Whilst one can turn over a few tables and make a temporary drama for a day - the key teaching - as I feel it - is to use the reflection to uncover and identify the corresponding pattern within our own consciousness. I recognize that the terms consciousness has become redefined to mean something that is generally very weak, ineffectual or even imaginary - excepting by those who are awake to the power of the mind - either for healing or for coercive fragmenting and manipulating. (Divide and rule).
Thanks for a friendly response. I just live here! (meaning I simply clothe insight in such a manner as a normal behaviour). However, the insight is never contained or defined in the form alone and can only be shared as a recognition. Asset stripping is nothing new.
The deceits and illusions of power
Look at the model of consciousness in usage and see if indeed the same devices are not active as are reflected in an insane world.
Proxy 'enemies' are best named as such - or one supports the assertive narrative in which less and less perspective or indeed choice, is possible.
I doubt anyone can be 'ready' for the revealing within our own mind of such as it has so forcefully and ingeniously hidden from awareness. 'War' or defence against exposure to terror is the prime 'duty' of such survival consciousness and yet of course what one resists, persists - and indeed becomes that by which one is defined.
The true nature of power is not weaponisable and is therefore invisible and irrelevant. The idea of power OVER is the reaction to a sense of being overpowered or overwhelmed by what seems unrelated to one's own thought act and deed. Therefore the power of true reflection is the capacity to recognize and correct errors of self definition.
I see the attempt to unify a separated or split off and fragmented sense of power in powerlessness - as the persistent refusal to reflect or look within. Such war CANNOT afford honesty - excepting very specific exceptions of moral convenience.
So beneath the attempt to consolidate power is the deceit of a separative identity and intent. Self specialness howsoever it is masked - and particularly in such forms as most effectively confer the deceit in belief one is acquiring or growing in power.
But if the true nature of enemy is a case of mistaken identity - the answer is to extend a true founded presence in place of being baited to reaction. While this by grace is given, the capacity to recognize and receive it is one with the willingness to share it.
Everything in the 'world' of privately controlled consciousness, operates AGAINST such recognition.
The reflections of experience in the world can serve a deeper willingness to break allegiance with coercive inhibition and distortion of true or free willingness - despite the negativity of such experience and because the spark of truth is felt. Truly Felt. Not more tricky thinking that cheats us of life while seeming to confer superior advantage.
If 'love thine enemy' is a profoundly transformative truth and not merely mind-games in rehearsal - it is because our 'enemy' reflects what we most hate, fear or despise in ourselves. Yet can also serve to most effectively free us from having to in any sense own or recognize in our self. Another angle on this is to say that each of us is the casting director in our own life and there are no roles being enacted that are not correspondences with something in our consciousness - even if it is profoundly held unconscious.
The model for the power to separate or split consciousness is the Judge - and indeed the power of communication or execution.
Guilt denies, invalidates and rejects Life. Judge no - lest you Be judged is another way of saying what you give out, you get back. As you sow - thus are you reaping. But to understand this only as linear temporal process is a dilution of an instantaneous recognition.
Denied fears invite guilt - or shadow power. Owned fears become aligned to consciously held purpose. If one is willing to feel and listen within the movement of the feeling rather than devote EVERYTHING to getting rid of the shit feelings ASAP!
Trying to get rid of that which is part of us unrecognised, feeds it negative charge and gives it power in the dark while SEEMING to achieve a temporary escape. If anyone get this it may be very helpful - but it wont save anyone from living the territory. No one else can really 'protect you' from your self-attack. But then nor can anyone prevent you from looking on it and finding it to be a false sense of yourself. Not a false set of ideas to now work on - but something that no longer commands allegiance and therefore has no power to 'make your choices for you'.
Praetor from the US (Comments on Parisians):
That is why they call them soft targets, no weapons or means of defense, just show the mind manipulated crazies some love, they will change their ways. How could anyone reject 'love, peace and harmony' for 'hate, war and chaos'. The U.S. has its 'love, peace and harmony bunch, but luckily, the majority know 'hate, war and chaos' is coming. The U.S. as in 'we the people' are a big problem for the one state.
My response:
Everyone already HAS rejected harmony for mind manipulated crazy - albeit redefined as normal. It may be seen that the identity within forms and ideals of love, peace and harmony attempts to hide or deny terror, hate, and rage - where those with an identity within anger, hate and revenge choose to try to actively get rid of, reject or deny the perceived enemy or threat.
Neither is open to communication of a true self-honesty here - or they would recognize their reflections.
I feel LOVE is the capacity and willingness to be with what is true - which is not as the world 'loves' - merely to get an outcome for itself. LOVE's willingness opens a different perspective from the reptilian fight or flight mindset.
From where I stand I see that denied hate, war and chaos (that the war-mind embodies in all its fragmented identities) is 'coming' - or rather is surfacing or rising despite AND BECAUSE OF the 'war on terror' which at its deepest level ,is the attempt to eradicate what is associated with terror so as to 'protect' the capacity to operate as a private power. Which is a deceit by which to operate from shadow power that seems self sufficient yet is really an oppositional and parasitic reaction to the power of Life. Yet in forms that seem rationally justified and self-evident to the mind that is seeks self validation at cost of honesty.
Whether the term 'we the people' actually embodies as a shared sense of LIFE - of truly shared worth - is to be seen. For the manipulation of minds with ideals and concepts is almost complete. Meanwhile the people are like golems, cattle, or lab-rats to those who understand and apply the ways of dominion over the mind.
All the people have to do is redefine themselves as terrorists, radicals or mind-manipulated crazies - and the New Global Order will have the justifiction for imposing itself that it nurtures and has been working toward for centuries.
How much the events in Paris are to be taken at face value is worthy of question. The only way to seek a truer perspective than manipulated reaction is to pause reaction - including thoughts - so as to allow discernment of the movement of being that is resonant with and relevant to the desire fro truth.
Desire for self-validation or righteous vengeance or superior understanding is all oppositional distortion to recognizing who and where you are in this situation.
Finding another way to meet hated chaos than denial and fragmentation might be opening a deeper honesty that the thinking could imagine. But that is why one must pause it to access an evolutionary path from a deeper embrace rather than persist that same exact reptilian primitive scenario over and over and over - through millennia. Generation upon generation.
Modelling love is being real and there are no rules or techniques for being real. Most so-called communication is manipulatory at its core - because our concepts are like our money - operating a negatively defined sense of self concept.
Redeeming our self and our world is exchanging a self-conceit of denial for a true relational willingness. This wont come from any ideas of such conceit - and the 'warriors' defending such 'self' will operate maximally to suppress any true willingness for communication - as they always have. If communication is deemed dangerous, it must be disrupted, suppressed, subverted, obfuscated, demonised, denied and defined in terms that trigger the most negative feelings - so that no one will break out of the conditioning - but would suffer pain of insanity and isolation.
A State of Illegitimacy
EUbrainwashing commented:
Clearly the French are hoping the result of this new endeavour will be something a fraction more successful than the outcome of OpĂration Harmattan against Lybia in 2011 - indeed the faction they are presuming to target this time, ISIL, are a direct result of the war against Gadaffi and the employment of al Qaeda to fight against that regime. And al Qaeda were the result of the forces assembled to fight the USSR in Afghanistan all that time ago. As the old adage goes: 'what goes around comes around' - obviously that logic does translate to French or could it be that all the governments that run with all this warmongering understand this truth all to well. I think so - they cannot be so otherwise stupid. There is only one solution to end such violence and lies - end the religious cult belief in the legitimacy and the utility of 'the state'.
binra to EUbrainwashing
I don't see that the State is more than a subverted form-meaning being used as disguised attack on our will - and by that I mean our true and sovereign will - not the version sold and sucked up by negatively defined identity.
So yes - recognize false beliefs and allegiances will fall away from them.
A war against Is - and indeed against the feminine aspect of Isis - is war on our own Life and Existence. As my typo suggested a moment ago - an act of exitance. (Suicide in defiance of Life).
Of course the associations being incepted with IS are terror by design.
If the deceiver can get you to give and live out from hatred, rage and fear, then the Presence of Life will be rendered invisible and intangible amidst the conflict and carnage and resulting order of compression in frozen 'consciousness' of no capacity to actually feel and move, Alive and Whole.
Insofar as organisational structures are given legitimacy to serve purpose they can be corrupted by subverting that purpose. Then it seems as if the corruption is OUTSIDE. But as you say - what goes around comes around - or as I say it - what you give out is what you get back.
The primary power we have is in what we accept true of ourself (in relation to any circumstance or experience) - for what we accept we automatically give or live out from - and becomes the framework of value or measure of our interpreted experience.
In this sense power is at the level of definitional Idea - believed. To accept what is not true of you (and this is for anyone) will be to conflict oneself - and that inevitably incepts the purpose of resolving conflict framed in external terms. Which MUST propagate and maintain conflict as the basis of self - unless and until the original error is revisited and perspective revisioned.
The original error may be described as taking an image of self - or an image of reality and accepting it true IN PLACE of the true and living movement of being that may image itself infinitely and richly in the unfolding of all that it is - but is not locked or frozen in assertion of self-definitions arising from the inherent conflict of identity in self concept.
The tendency is to 'solve the crisis' - and different approaches conflict - whilst sharing this underlying definition. The capacity to feel the crisis as messenger and message from a higher or deeper or more inclusive perspective - that is not to be killed but 'opened and received' despite its most unwelcome insulting and humiliating experience.
EUbrainwashing replies to me:My reply to EUbrainwashing:
Boy your comment is hard work to read and digest! I think I get it and I think it is a very deep and true series of points you make, but boy oh boy, as usual, it takes some prising out.
Well I (truly) commend you on your willingness and trust that any discovered depth is a measure of your own in-sight and recognition. If you find a way to make the same points in simpler or clearer ways - go for it! There are key factors that operate a reversal in consciousness of a kind we are becoming more able to notice and unmask in our world.
I know it is possible to translate some of this into more accessible accepted idioms - yet that translation almost always operates as a 'new wine into old wine bottles' where the FORMS of insight and recognition are lost to a subtler manipulative ploy that uses them to block and mask its intent. Willingness to bring attention present is a key quality that a deceptive rationalism does not require or desire.
I feel that discernment works different to judgement. The latter censors everything whilst running it through a database of past association and so cannot deal in anything whole or truly present - being locked in the past. But an openness to the whole of what is present allows the heart to feel and tune into the resonance and relevance to what is desired or called forth as the need of the situation.
A tangible sense of 'where something is coming from' is a key to reading it. If something is coming from a place of coercive persuasion, then even if it borrows facts - it is working a hidden agenda. Likewise if we read seeking only reinforcement of an existing hidden personal agenda - we will not let information in - in case it upsets our 'established order'.
The way to navigate and transform obstructive and challenging situations calls for becoming truly present with ALL of what is here - which is a transformative act. Humanity has become very 'lazy' seeking to run on auto or sleep mode while leaving a sort of template to run everything. But as is becoming evident - the moneylenders have usurped the template as the assertion of control and power over needs and the meeting of needs.
Whilst one can turn over a few tables and make a temporary drama for a day - the key teaching - as I feel it - is to use the reflection to uncover and identify the corresponding pattern within our own consciousness. I recognize that the terms consciousness has become redefined to mean something that is generally very weak, ineffectual or even imaginary - excepting by those who are awake to the power of the mind - either for healing or for coercive fragmenting and manipulating. (Divide and rule).
Thanks for a friendly response. I just live here! (meaning I simply clothe insight in such a manner as a normal behaviour). However, the insight is never contained or defined in the form alone and can only be shared as a recognition. Asset stripping is nothing new.
The deceits and illusions of power
Bruce C Commented: ... If people are going to be cowed by these acts of Islamic jihad and go along with whatever reductions in freedoms for all (i.e., no exceptions unless you're a "VIP") then why not insist upon and encourage personal gun ownership and concealment? At least then we/they don't have to know the answer to the riddle of who the real enemy is quite yet because when it becomes more obvious we'll be ready.
Given the trends and the rhetoric, so far I'd say the real enemy is the centralization of power.
Look at the model of consciousness in usage and see if indeed the same devices are not active as are reflected in an insane world.
Proxy 'enemies' are best named as such - or one supports the assertive narrative in which less and less perspective or indeed choice, is possible.
I doubt anyone can be 'ready' for the revealing within our own mind of such as it has so forcefully and ingeniously hidden from awareness. 'War' or defence against exposure to terror is the prime 'duty' of such survival consciousness and yet of course what one resists, persists - and indeed becomes that by which one is defined.
The true nature of power is not weaponisable and is therefore invisible and irrelevant. The idea of power OVER is the reaction to a sense of being overpowered or overwhelmed by what seems unrelated to one's own thought act and deed. Therefore the power of true reflection is the capacity to recognize and correct errors of self definition.
I see the attempt to unify a separated or split off and fragmented sense of power in powerlessness - as the persistent refusal to reflect or look within. Such war CANNOT afford honesty - excepting very specific exceptions of moral convenience.
So beneath the attempt to consolidate power is the deceit of a separative identity and intent. Self specialness howsoever it is masked - and particularly in such forms as most effectively confer the deceit in belief one is acquiring or growing in power.
But if the true nature of enemy is a case of mistaken identity - the answer is to extend a true founded presence in place of being baited to reaction. While this by grace is given, the capacity to recognize and receive it is one with the willingness to share it.
Everything in the 'world' of privately controlled consciousness, operates AGAINST such recognition.
The reflections of experience in the world can serve a deeper willingness to break allegiance with coercive inhibition and distortion of true or free willingness - despite the negativity of such experience and because the spark of truth is felt. Truly Felt. Not more tricky thinking that cheats us of life while seeming to confer superior advantage.
If 'love thine enemy' is a profoundly transformative truth and not merely mind-games in rehearsal - it is because our 'enemy' reflects what we most hate, fear or despise in ourselves. Yet can also serve to most effectively free us from having to in any sense own or recognize in our self. Another angle on this is to say that each of us is the casting director in our own life and there are no roles being enacted that are not correspondences with something in our consciousness - even if it is profoundly held unconscious.
The model for the power to separate or split consciousness is the Judge - and indeed the power of communication or execution.
Guilt denies, invalidates and rejects Life. Judge no - lest you Be judged is another way of saying what you give out, you get back. As you sow - thus are you reaping. But to understand this only as linear temporal process is a dilution of an instantaneous recognition.
Denied fears invite guilt - or shadow power. Owned fears become aligned to consciously held purpose. If one is willing to feel and listen within the movement of the feeling rather than devote EVERYTHING to getting rid of the shit feelings ASAP!
Trying to get rid of that which is part of us unrecognised, feeds it negative charge and gives it power in the dark while SEEMING to achieve a temporary escape. If anyone get this it may be very helpful - but it wont save anyone from living the territory. No one else can really 'protect you' from your self-attack. But then nor can anyone prevent you from looking on it and finding it to be a false sense of yourself. Not a false set of ideas to now work on - but something that no longer commands allegiance and therefore has no power to 'make your choices for you'.
Thursday, 10 September 2015
Communication breakdown or refusal to feel and know
These were commented into one of the UK mainstream news articles on the legality of UK drone execution on Syrian territory.
Does that apply to those in positions of power who attempt to usurp from within? (No less a crime but who steals a kingdom is called 'king').
If false case is laid before you will you give a blank cheque to execute the framed - as in Iraq's invented "weapons of mass destruction".
Is 'terrorist" a clearly defined term? Do you see that many terrorists become legal governments - as in the founding of Israel for example -or the ending of SA Apartheid.
If you are aware of the true context in which inflammation arises you would not seek to inflame it further with arrogant self-righteousness. A process of communication and core justice is generally persistently DENIED by those in power to those who suffer denial.
But while suffering the illusion of righteous power, war - in one form or another, persists! War draws many into it to become the sacrifice to its god. War operates the economy and our thinking in almost all aspects of our culture.
As I see the current trend almost EVERYONE is being systematically stripped of their citizenship through ruses of manufactured austerity and likewise seeded 'war on terror'.
In the usurping of wisdom and in the name of protection does Foxy Loxy induce the willing to entrapment.
If Foxy has your thoughts - you may think them your own - until a true account is called.
Justice is not in the world of war - but it is inescapable. "Everything you do, you do unto Me" holds a meaning the war-minded refuse to hear - and war is the way to block the ear in mass distraction and notional security. The enemy is subtler than a mind in reaction can imagine - for such a mind is generated BY the fear that hides in deceit. I declare a state of peace to exist beneath and beyond the mind-world of hate of fear and shame - but it is only found by true willing desire. Who would scapegoat others with their own guilt - let them hear the crowing cock.
Wrap it up and dismiss it - as if you have actually engaged in communication. Such is the nature of an ignorance and arrogance that is defended against the possibility of feeling awareness - of the presence of life. Yes you can manufacture emotionality as part of your strategy, yes you can ardently worship and defend some symbolic token of 'Life" but what you cannot or will not do, is listen - because of course 'you already know'. But to judge is not to know and everything you give out comes back - not in vengeance but as justice of setting the measure of your worth.
Consider that the 'war' on terror - has and is forcefully SEEDING the very thing it purports to 'eradicate' whilst operating the eradication of rights and freedoms of its own population. It also asset strips the Earth to an evaporation of misery and debt and powerlessness. Into which at some pre-ordained threat, the need and call for global power as protection is inserted.
There are better ways to live than upon a foundation of terror - which operates to split off our minds from Creation Itself.
To find true cultural renewal on has to go much deeper than the fear by which we are manipulated - or it is but rebranding spin upon denial of a war within our own consciousness.
It may be so that anyone can become anyone else's hate target - or be run over, fall down stairs, etc But the replaying of terror symbols in the mind as a persistent threat by which to shut down the truly creative being we are is a self-made living death. You THINK you can use it to have your moment of power - and obviously you have your reward - but such victory is hollow and fleeting - and honesty rises if you don't keep it at bay - because true nature does not use coercion to be all that it is. Only the lie calls for such defence to seem thus to survive.
Hate is blind - whether us or them, but consider that false flag and trojan deceit is established in the mind of power as necessary evils - and the price it demands collateral loss. It is never satiated but fleetingly.
To an expressed desire to summarily kill presumed or alleged enemies without due process of law:
Does that apply to those in positions of power who attempt to usurp from within? (No less a crime but who steals a kingdom is called 'king').
If false case is laid before you will you give a blank cheque to execute the framed - as in Iraq's invented "weapons of mass destruction".
Is 'terrorist" a clearly defined term? Do you see that many terrorists become legal governments - as in the founding of Israel for example -or the ending of SA Apartheid.
If you are aware of the true context in which inflammation arises you would not seek to inflame it further with arrogant self-righteousness. A process of communication and core justice is generally persistently DENIED by those in power to those who suffer denial.
But while suffering the illusion of righteous power, war - in one form or another, persists! War draws many into it to become the sacrifice to its god. War operates the economy and our thinking in almost all aspects of our culture.
To an expressed desire to automatically strip citizenship from any presumed or alleged enemies without due process of law:
As I see the current trend almost EVERYONE is being systematically stripped of their citizenship through ruses of manufactured austerity and likewise seeded 'war on terror'.
In the usurping of wisdom and in the name of protection does Foxy Loxy induce the willing to entrapment.
If Foxy has your thoughts - you may think them your own - until a true account is called.
Justice is not in the world of war - but it is inescapable. "Everything you do, you do unto Me" holds a meaning the war-minded refuse to hear - and war is the way to block the ear in mass distraction and notional security. The enemy is subtler than a mind in reaction can imagine - for such a mind is generated BY the fear that hides in deceit. I declare a state of peace to exist beneath and beyond the mind-world of hate of fear and shame - but it is only found by true willing desire. Who would scapegoat others with their own guilt - let them hear the crowing cock.
To a summary execution (inavlidating dismissal) of what I wrote without due process of communication:
Wrap it up and dismiss it - as if you have actually engaged in communication. Such is the nature of an ignorance and arrogance that is defended against the possibility of feeling awareness - of the presence of life. Yes you can manufacture emotionality as part of your strategy, yes you can ardently worship and defend some symbolic token of 'Life" but what you cannot or will not do, is listen - because of course 'you already know'. But to judge is not to know and everything you give out comes back - not in vengeance but as justice of setting the measure of your worth.
Consider that the 'war' on terror - has and is forcefully SEEDING the very thing it purports to 'eradicate' whilst operating the eradication of rights and freedoms of its own population. It also asset strips the Earth to an evaporation of misery and debt and powerlessness. Into which at some pre-ordained threat, the need and call for global power as protection is inserted.
There are better ways to live than upon a foundation of terror - which operates to split off our minds from Creation Itself.
To find true cultural renewal on has to go much deeper than the fear by which we are manipulated - or it is but rebranding spin upon denial of a war within our own consciousness.
It may be so that anyone can become anyone else's hate target - or be run over, fall down stairs, etc But the replaying of terror symbols in the mind as a persistent threat by which to shut down the truly creative being we are is a self-made living death. You THINK you can use it to have your moment of power - and obviously you have your reward - but such victory is hollow and fleeting - and honesty rises if you don't keep it at bay - because true nature does not use coercion to be all that it is. Only the lie calls for such defence to seem thus to survive.
Hate is blind - whether us or them, but consider that false flag and trojan deceit is established in the mind of power as necessary evils - and the price it demands collateral loss. It is never satiated but fleetingly.
Wednesday, 9 September 2015
The NWO since 9/11
‘Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death’: The Loss of Our Freedoms in the Wake of 9/11
By John Whitehead
---
comment:
The act of terror is one level of terror but the use of a terror event as a defiant assertion of power over the mind itself is a different order of terror. A new holocaust for a new brand of exceptionalism - well its an old brand re-applied...
It was a kind of mental blitzkrieg. It has shifted everything - but with different effect. That is - I awoke to behold the intensity and audacity of the will to power by deceit and terror in such a way as to no longer give allegiance or trust to anything reported - for it was more than an iron fist beneath a glove. It is a deceiver revealed, not merely in the world stage, but in my own mapping of trigger points.
And to be fair, deceit is so pervasively part of the human currency that it is the audacity in disregard for life that buckles the mind - not the destruction of buildings with people in. Any traumatic death can stop the mind - but the attempt to dictate the world narrative and enforce that as the prevailing truth is asserting a new world order that veils its power in an obviously falsely framed and set up attack. That's the power - not the mini nukes. They know we know its a set-up. They are confident in denying any voice to make any real difference.
The setting up of a horror to then make pseudo-religion of, is a form of mind control.
Very clever people study the mind with a view not to healing but to manipulating. They can falsely frame and subliminally trigger the guilts and fears they know are in you but denied or unhealed. They see humanity as a mechanism that can be programmed and manipulated - and except themselves by virtue of a sense of specialness, to be as lords or gods over men. It's an old script.
Whoever comes to find they have been checkmated by outcomes they did not expect may wonder if it was a fate they brought on themselves or a destiny they could not but enact unknowing.
Meanwhile the call to war is still in play... or is it the Call for healing? You get to choose.
The prism splits light into frequency bands and the times we are now in are a time of prism by which our choices - our responses - establish who we accept and believe ourself to be. I cant tell you how - but I sense a vibrational splitting to parallel Earth realities, so make sure you are on the bus that you are happy to live in for the next Cycle. It's getting more difficult to change buses. But nothing is difficult that is wholly desired.
Whereas dread of terror would deny all choice and frame only within the a war of powers, True acceptance embraces and releases all that is, as it is to be itself anew - and in this does freedom to choose rise as a positive integrational act rather than a fear defined avoidance.
That we have a choice is the communication beneath the captive attention within its own narrative, awaiting your noticing. What you choose to attend is your freedom to accept and live from. But if what Is... is denied and hidden by a false framing deceit - then the choices that are left you are no choice at all but what the device dictates.
The consolidation of power becomes the call to more deeply examine what we give power to - for it is ours to give, according to the meaning we get from the Word or definition we give. The false flag is a primary device for using a self inflicted wound as a means to displace or direct blame in hate and therefore appeal as justification for making war while guilting the other. Kids utilize this in the cradle and I sense it is part of the forgetting by which to enter a human lifetime.
I am always talking of the mind whatever the issue because it is an unwatched mind that falls prey to deceits that usurp the mind unawares.
This need not be. One can use the experiences as an education rather than being triggered in reaction. Its a choice.
By John Whitehead
---
comment:
The act of terror is one level of terror but the use of a terror event as a defiant assertion of power over the mind itself is a different order of terror. A new holocaust for a new brand of exceptionalism - well its an old brand re-applied...
"THEY are seeking to destroy you and THEY are not like you and I, but are all around us and you MUST NOT challenge my protection of you, as this fear pervades every aspect of your life, and you MUST NOT challenge my wounds nor question my justification for attack - or you are supporting THEM - you are not then one of US but like THEM and forfeit whatever voice you had for THEY only lie as a prelude to turning on you". So you must be seen to support me or you choose to share THEIR fate.
It was a kind of mental blitzkrieg. It has shifted everything - but with different effect. That is - I awoke to behold the intensity and audacity of the will to power by deceit and terror in such a way as to no longer give allegiance or trust to anything reported - for it was more than an iron fist beneath a glove. It is a deceiver revealed, not merely in the world stage, but in my own mapping of trigger points.
And to be fair, deceit is so pervasively part of the human currency that it is the audacity in disregard for life that buckles the mind - not the destruction of buildings with people in. Any traumatic death can stop the mind - but the attempt to dictate the world narrative and enforce that as the prevailing truth is asserting a new world order that veils its power in an obviously falsely framed and set up attack. That's the power - not the mini nukes. They know we know its a set-up. They are confident in denying any voice to make any real difference.
The setting up of a horror to then make pseudo-religion of, is a form of mind control.
Very clever people study the mind with a view not to healing but to manipulating. They can falsely frame and subliminally trigger the guilts and fears they know are in you but denied or unhealed. They see humanity as a mechanism that can be programmed and manipulated - and except themselves by virtue of a sense of specialness, to be as lords or gods over men. It's an old script.
Whoever comes to find they have been checkmated by outcomes they did not expect may wonder if it was a fate they brought on themselves or a destiny they could not but enact unknowing.
Meanwhile the call to war is still in play... or is it the Call for healing? You get to choose.
The prism splits light into frequency bands and the times we are now in are a time of prism by which our choices - our responses - establish who we accept and believe ourself to be. I cant tell you how - but I sense a vibrational splitting to parallel Earth realities, so make sure you are on the bus that you are happy to live in for the next Cycle. It's getting more difficult to change buses. But nothing is difficult that is wholly desired.
Whereas dread of terror would deny all choice and frame only within the a war of powers, True acceptance embraces and releases all that is, as it is to be itself anew - and in this does freedom to choose rise as a positive integrational act rather than a fear defined avoidance.
That we have a choice is the communication beneath the captive attention within its own narrative, awaiting your noticing. What you choose to attend is your freedom to accept and live from. But if what Is... is denied and hidden by a false framing deceit - then the choices that are left you are no choice at all but what the device dictates.
The consolidation of power becomes the call to more deeply examine what we give power to - for it is ours to give, according to the meaning we get from the Word or definition we give. The false flag is a primary device for using a self inflicted wound as a means to displace or direct blame in hate and therefore appeal as justification for making war while guilting the other. Kids utilize this in the cradle and I sense it is part of the forgetting by which to enter a human lifetime.
I am always talking of the mind whatever the issue because it is an unwatched mind that falls prey to deceits that usurp the mind unawares.
This need not be. One can use the experiences as an education rather than being triggered in reaction. Its a choice.
Assassination by drone
Cameron’s drone strike in Syria raises questions
I do not give credibility to anything reported at face value, especially when effectively pasted into the main stream media. In modern times more sophisticated ways of engineering perceptions and indeed consent are available and used without due transparency or accountability. A purpose of self-protection operates openly. But what is protected to persist may not be true of us and may actually hasten loss or death. Fear stifles growth and war inflames negative 'growths'.
We are assured that our established institutional power structures are acting in our best interest and not serving their own private agenda as a power cartels - for by the regulatory protections that deny transparency and accountability, they become cartels imposing upon their will upon their citizens rather than in a genuine relationship of service.
Criminal acts are not acceptable and the rule of law is called upon. No matter who is involved.
Is the seeding and propagation of terrorism used as a proxy for other agendas? - for the so called "War On" anything has always effected the promotion and seeding of that thing - wither haplessly or by design. So who benefits? - what agendas are enacted within its cover? Follow the money? Note the consolidations of power? What are the weaknesses by which we are exploited to support what we would not otherwise choose or tolerate in ourself?
Are you told what to think? Is fear the basis of our thinking, or are we indeed created in and of a true presence of communication extending?
The 'deceiver' is fear-thinking. It plays all sides of any conflict and uses our fears as a point of gaining leverage and support. Personally I recommend not to use it, for no matter what it promises it always deals the same hand.
It appears that Mr Cameron is openly dealing the death penalty to British citizens in a foreign country without any prior procedure of trial or accountability whilst appealing to secret intelligence under notional security to justify himself after the act. That the individuals may have in fact been who the intelligence says they were and intending what is said they were is not the point - though anyone emotionally captive to the narrative will insist it is THE point. But that is the power of controlling the narrative! The war being unleashed is not contained or containable excepting by pausing from reaction within the narrative of hate and fear and the distortions and deceptions that are natural to hate and fear.
Everything we do, teaches others but also sets the measure of our own learning. We come to believe our own spin! We ARE each and all making choices that determine our world - and the world that then unfolds of such choices - for to choose to love to hate invites hatred to usurp our sovereignty of will in a false sense of power and an over extending reach that hollows out and lays waste. And we are undone not by 'enemy' but by our own vanity and folly. Who thinks they can control war? The globalist "elite" and their new world order? They embody the idea of war - not in their core humanity - but in the idea of exclusive right or power to prevail over and deny all else. And of course such action brings equal and opposite reaction - which they think they are using but they are out of relation and cannot see the humanity of others because they do not accept their own. I do believe a global governance will come - but one that serves the balance points for a maximal diversity of living, not a top-down dictate upon slaves. We've been there so many times.
Our humanity is the key to our divinity - but to become in the image of our hate is to forsake our true inheritance and believe ourself denied and to seek scapegoats to dump on and to kill. It isn't really fundamentalism, extremism or radicalism - but an exclusive self righteousness within whatever forms mask the hate and thus give it justification - or sanctify it in the 'religion' of victim sacrifice to a jealous and vengeful god - for such is the god of fear - regardless to forms it takes.
Waking up is a capacity to discern the communication within the form - rather than captive to form-based narrative. Why feed a man with fear when you can teach him how to recognize phishing attacks?
I do not give credibility to anything reported at face value, especially when effectively pasted into the main stream media. In modern times more sophisticated ways of engineering perceptions and indeed consent are available and used without due transparency or accountability. A purpose of self-protection operates openly. But what is protected to persist may not be true of us and may actually hasten loss or death. Fear stifles growth and war inflames negative 'growths'.
We are assured that our established institutional power structures are acting in our best interest and not serving their own private agenda as a power cartels - for by the regulatory protections that deny transparency and accountability, they become cartels imposing upon their will upon their citizens rather than in a genuine relationship of service.
Criminal acts are not acceptable and the rule of law is called upon. No matter who is involved.
Is the seeding and propagation of terrorism used as a proxy for other agendas? - for the so called "War On" anything has always effected the promotion and seeding of that thing - wither haplessly or by design. So who benefits? - what agendas are enacted within its cover? Follow the money? Note the consolidations of power? What are the weaknesses by which we are exploited to support what we would not otherwise choose or tolerate in ourself?
Are you told what to think? Is fear the basis of our thinking, or are we indeed created in and of a true presence of communication extending?
The 'deceiver' is fear-thinking. It plays all sides of any conflict and uses our fears as a point of gaining leverage and support. Personally I recommend not to use it, for no matter what it promises it always deals the same hand.
It appears that Mr Cameron is openly dealing the death penalty to British citizens in a foreign country without any prior procedure of trial or accountability whilst appealing to secret intelligence under notional security to justify himself after the act. That the individuals may have in fact been who the intelligence says they were and intending what is said they were is not the point - though anyone emotionally captive to the narrative will insist it is THE point. But that is the power of controlling the narrative! The war being unleashed is not contained or containable excepting by pausing from reaction within the narrative of hate and fear and the distortions and deceptions that are natural to hate and fear.
Everything we do, teaches others but also sets the measure of our own learning. We come to believe our own spin! We ARE each and all making choices that determine our world - and the world that then unfolds of such choices - for to choose to love to hate invites hatred to usurp our sovereignty of will in a false sense of power and an over extending reach that hollows out and lays waste. And we are undone not by 'enemy' but by our own vanity and folly. Who thinks they can control war? The globalist "elite" and their new world order? They embody the idea of war - not in their core humanity - but in the idea of exclusive right or power to prevail over and deny all else. And of course such action brings equal and opposite reaction - which they think they are using but they are out of relation and cannot see the humanity of others because they do not accept their own. I do believe a global governance will come - but one that serves the balance points for a maximal diversity of living, not a top-down dictate upon slaves. We've been there so many times.
Our humanity is the key to our divinity - but to become in the image of our hate is to forsake our true inheritance and believe ourself denied and to seek scapegoats to dump on and to kill. It isn't really fundamentalism, extremism or radicalism - but an exclusive self righteousness within whatever forms mask the hate and thus give it justification - or sanctify it in the 'religion' of victim sacrifice to a jealous and vengeful god - for such is the god of fear - regardless to forms it takes.
Waking up is a capacity to discern the communication within the form - rather than captive to form-based narrative. Why feed a man with fear when you can teach him how to recognize phishing attacks?
Monday, 19 January 2015
Terror blowback?
In response to an Article: Europe's terror attacks: The blowback from Western intervention | OpEdNews
- - -
We live in an era where false flag and staged events are a significant possibility among actual events.
Where journalism is told what to write or trained to know what not to write.
Notwithstanding this, un-managed or unexpected events also serve or are seized upon for serving political agendas with distorted interpretation.
If the 'terror' is the instigator AND the intended effect - then terrorism is the new politics - not that it was absent in the old. Terror-victimhood and fear offers the 'justifiction' for the assertion of power upon populations by established powers.
Fear triggers reaction. Fear conditions patterns of identity and reaction. Fear thus operates a self reinforcing delusion unless its alarm is used to awaken our consciousness to align more truly and deeply within Consciousness.
For personal agenda overrides honesty and we all know that truth is the first and implicit casualty of war.
Not that truth stops being true - but that fearful coercions and deceits are brought into effect to heavily discourage witnessing or communicating truly. 'Protection rackets' are scams that impose and magnify the conditions by which they are validated and necessary and powerful - and defend against anything that actually facilitates peace.
Yes, if provoked enough, one can often generate 'blowback' reaction. If one cant, then one can carry out such actions in ways that are perceived as intended. This will not always be so. But it is sometimes so.
- - -
We live in an era where false flag and staged events are a significant possibility among actual events.
Where journalism is told what to write or trained to know what not to write.
Notwithstanding this, un-managed or unexpected events also serve or are seized upon for serving political agendas with distorted interpretation.
If the 'terror' is the instigator AND the intended effect - then terrorism is the new politics - not that it was absent in the old. Terror-victimhood and fear offers the 'justifiction' for the assertion of power upon populations by established powers.
Fear triggers reaction. Fear conditions patterns of identity and reaction. Fear thus operates a self reinforcing delusion unless its alarm is used to awaken our consciousness to align more truly and deeply within Consciousness.
For personal agenda overrides honesty and we all know that truth is the first and implicit casualty of war.
Not that truth stops being true - but that fearful coercions and deceits are brought into effect to heavily discourage witnessing or communicating truly. 'Protection rackets' are scams that impose and magnify the conditions by which they are validated and necessary and powerful - and defend against anything that actually facilitates peace.
Yes, if provoked enough, one can often generate 'blowback' reaction. If one cant, then one can carry out such actions in ways that are perceived as intended. This will not always be so. But it is sometimes so.
Friday, 9 January 2015
Freedom to communicate is not a weapon
Charlie Hebdo Shooting: Maori Broadcaster Derek Fox Under Fire For Victim-Blaming Comments on Paris Terror Attacks
Freedom to blame, to invalidate, attack and undermine other people - in the name of 'freedom'?
Hatred born of fear and guilt can take many disguises. None of them are free to love. Love is free to create - but deceit can only work to deny, distort and destroy. Who wants to be outraged and offended or use proxies for their grievance, will seek and find the basis for justifying hate and attack - on some level. Is there not a fanaticism that denies and subverts all communication in the name of 'freedom' - and it works every side of every conflict. For it makes the darkness in which to operate and grow in power unnoticed.
The deceiver is for many an archaic term for an agenda that operates destructively, largely by remaining hidden or in disguise. In any potential event of undoing by exposure it will sacrifice 'others' by scape-goating them as evil, worthless and heretical or insane. It offers 'righteous vengeance' to cover over the evil one fears in oneself.
In a world where false flags have been historically shown to be normally part of a war of manipulating perceptions to trigger predictable reaction, one is wise to look and see what agendas ARE being pushed. The 'war on terror' propagates terror. It increase darkness against light of true understanding.
When Jesus said "Resist ye not evil" he taught a fundamental creative responsibility - for what one focus on and feeds attention to, magnifies.
Murder is murder. Incitement or provocation to hate may be foolhardy but doesn't call for or warrant murder. But those who believe they are aggrieved, will believe it the basis for vengeance in one form or another - and hatred is not a sane perspective.
Is Derek Fox embodying freedom of speech? Are those who vilify him trying to shut down his right to free speech? In such confusions as are our world, we un-mindfully react and compound them. Fear is not a true foundation from which to live. It steals our joy in life and ravages our world. Seek a true foundation!
Gary Carkeek reacted thusly:
The fact that Fox was able to make his comments is proof he (and we) are allowed to - we have freedom of speech. Evaluating another's words is also freedom of speech, and being disgusted by it is not and attempt to 'shut down' that right. Do you honestly not get that?
To Gary I say:
Communication is - as far as I am concerned - an exchange within a relationship. The use of communication as a weapon of coercion or manipulation operates to deny relationship and communication under the 'name' of some appeal for an ideal such as 'freedom' or under the appeal of self-righteousness in opposing something tarred as 'disgusting'.
Manipulated consciousness is in many ways, the current world order, and works by guile and deceit such as to deny its own exposure. Personal or collective emotionality is not holy, but it is a point of leverage for manipulators.
Vilification is an attempt to deny or invalidate another. Can you not address the issue without attacking the person? All choices have consequences. The idea of acting without consequence is a false idea of freedom. What we give out sets the measure of what we get back. If you believe emotionally backed coercions will free you, you will believe in their reality when they rebound.
So much miscommunication arises from holding completely irreconcilable self definitions, from which irreconcilable notions of freedom extend automatically. If one is 'allowed' a freedom, is it then innate or true? Who 'allows'? Who or what is the power that chooses to allow or disallow freedom? Is it that which consolidates through fear? Can reacting fearfully truly express freedom? Is not fear's dictum, 'divide and rule'?
Emotionality is not holy - but a true capacity to feel is innate to our Soul and our sanity. Tokenism may posit its 'proofs'. I suggest that 'political correctness' gives rise to fear of vilification that is actively undermining our willingness to communicate and relate, but merely reacting against it only feeds its appetite. War breeds war. War is the condition in which light cannot enter, truth is denied and persona agenda indulged as if THAT is freedom.
Freedom to assert what one is NOT at the expense of what we truly are, is the insanity of
human-un-kind. To uncover this in part IS disgusting in ourselves and so most will seek to get rid of it by whatever means asap. True sanity cannot be founded on running away from what we hate and fear in ourselves in attempt to put it out upon the other and attack them so as to aggressively disown our own part. But this pattern is a collective human defence mechanism that operates destructively in our midst. It generates and feeds war and woe.
Also please notice the comments you reacted to were questions inviting consideration and not assertions imposing themselves on the reader. You missed the very next sentence after the one you misread.
Are you free to evaluate or is that already sold out to a defensive reflex? I do not mean this to demean you - but as a moment of noticing how easy it is to react to what isn't there - but which the mind believes is there. This is the direction of enquiry that uncovers opportunity for healing and unifying in place of polarized insanity.
Freedom to blame, to invalidate, attack and undermine other people - in the name of 'freedom'?
Hatred born of fear and guilt can take many disguises. None of them are free to love. Love is free to create - but deceit can only work to deny, distort and destroy. Who wants to be outraged and offended or use proxies for their grievance, will seek and find the basis for justifying hate and attack - on some level. Is there not a fanaticism that denies and subverts all communication in the name of 'freedom' - and it works every side of every conflict. For it makes the darkness in which to operate and grow in power unnoticed.
The deceiver is for many an archaic term for an agenda that operates destructively, largely by remaining hidden or in disguise. In any potential event of undoing by exposure it will sacrifice 'others' by scape-goating them as evil, worthless and heretical or insane. It offers 'righteous vengeance' to cover over the evil one fears in oneself.
In a world where false flags have been historically shown to be normally part of a war of manipulating perceptions to trigger predictable reaction, one is wise to look and see what agendas ARE being pushed. The 'war on terror' propagates terror. It increase darkness against light of true understanding.
When Jesus said "Resist ye not evil" he taught a fundamental creative responsibility - for what one focus on and feeds attention to, magnifies.
Murder is murder. Incitement or provocation to hate may be foolhardy but doesn't call for or warrant murder. But those who believe they are aggrieved, will believe it the basis for vengeance in one form or another - and hatred is not a sane perspective.
Is Derek Fox embodying freedom of speech? Are those who vilify him trying to shut down his right to free speech? In such confusions as are our world, we un-mindfully react and compound them. Fear is not a true foundation from which to live. It steals our joy in life and ravages our world. Seek a true foundation!
Gary Carkeek reacted thusly:
The fact that Fox was able to make his comments is proof he (and we) are allowed to - we have freedom of speech. Evaluating another's words is also freedom of speech, and being disgusted by it is not and attempt to 'shut down' that right. Do you honestly not get that?
To Gary I say:
Communication is - as far as I am concerned - an exchange within a relationship. The use of communication as a weapon of coercion or manipulation operates to deny relationship and communication under the 'name' of some appeal for an ideal such as 'freedom' or under the appeal of self-righteousness in opposing something tarred as 'disgusting'.
Manipulated consciousness is in many ways, the current world order, and works by guile and deceit such as to deny its own exposure. Personal or collective emotionality is not holy, but it is a point of leverage for manipulators.
Vilification is an attempt to deny or invalidate another. Can you not address the issue without attacking the person? All choices have consequences. The idea of acting without consequence is a false idea of freedom. What we give out sets the measure of what we get back. If you believe emotionally backed coercions will free you, you will believe in their reality when they rebound.
So much miscommunication arises from holding completely irreconcilable self definitions, from which irreconcilable notions of freedom extend automatically. If one is 'allowed' a freedom, is it then innate or true? Who 'allows'? Who or what is the power that chooses to allow or disallow freedom? Is it that which consolidates through fear? Can reacting fearfully truly express freedom? Is not fear's dictum, 'divide and rule'?
Emotionality is not holy - but a true capacity to feel is innate to our Soul and our sanity. Tokenism may posit its 'proofs'. I suggest that 'political correctness' gives rise to fear of vilification that is actively undermining our willingness to communicate and relate, but merely reacting against it only feeds its appetite. War breeds war. War is the condition in which light cannot enter, truth is denied and persona agenda indulged as if THAT is freedom.
Freedom to assert what one is NOT at the expense of what we truly are, is the insanity of
human-un-kind. To uncover this in part IS disgusting in ourselves and so most will seek to get rid of it by whatever means asap. True sanity cannot be founded on running away from what we hate and fear in ourselves in attempt to put it out upon the other and attack them so as to aggressively disown our own part. But this pattern is a collective human defence mechanism that operates destructively in our midst. It generates and feeds war and woe.
Also please notice the comments you reacted to were questions inviting consideration and not assertions imposing themselves on the reader. You missed the very next sentence after the one you misread.
" In such confusions as are our world, we un-mindfully react and compound them".
Are you free to evaluate or is that already sold out to a defensive reflex? I do not mean this to demean you - but as a moment of noticing how easy it is to react to what isn't there - but which the mind believes is there. This is the direction of enquiry that uncovers opportunity for healing and unifying in place of polarized insanity.
Friday, 14 November 2014
Locked into war?
This article is buried in a misleading headline, for what it actually reports of Mr Cameron's plans goes far beyond tech firms being compelled to censor the Net.Tech firms need to fight jihadist material online says David Cameron
UK prime minister unveils joint initiative with Australia to ensure that internet does not become “an ungoverned space”
- - -
“If we are to bust the myths that stand in the way of the great new trade and investment deals now before us".
The "we" and the "us" surely refers to what might be colloquially called gangster elitists and the rest are "busted".
The tempter suggests with isistence (oops! that was a slip of the fingers) - that "the country" - well, most of the globe really - is being locked into "an idealogical war" from which opting out will be denied - IF of course we do no opt out while the trap is not fully set.
I'm quite willing to accept that otherwise honourable and loveable people can be conditioned or in some sense subverted and corrupted by insider dealings that seem to make sense in the forms they are framed.
But how far can a mind stretch in knowingly speaking out the sense-less because some alternative scenario insists that to not do so is worse?
Un-owned fear is the 'cause' of projected hatred.
Of course one acts to side WITH freedom - even if we are clumsy or imperfect in so doing. But to FIGHT for freedom is to make war the only freedom.
No one can give what they do no have. A greater perspective will not come from the fear-driven, and a blindness of self-agenda will not serve excepting to demonstrate a lack of wholeness of mind - the alarm of which serves to awaken the NEED for Perspective - unless it is used to perpetuate war.
Double-speak - double-think is the ideology of a split mind - regardless of its flag or label. Ideology is dead - long live the king of negatively defined ideology. We now have none of our own and have to import it from opposing IS.
The negatively defined self IS the root problem. All split polarities feed each other to mutually reinforce identities that otherwise disintegrate.
This kind of thinking has been engaged, employed and developed for a long time. If it is not disengaged from operating in our own minds we will be baited into reactive futility. My invitation is to pause in the idea that one is not locked into personal reaction, but can pause our own 'thinking in its liability to doublespeak us falsely, and allow perspective in which we feel connected not with energy of self righteous vindication, but with a core sense of value that MUST extend and include others - even if they suffer thought disordered estrangement from such value in themselves.
Mad or delusional identity takes any form of multiple personalities to assert a coercive agenda. In desperation it becomes more obviously deranged and dangerous. But the answer to danger is a true accounting and this the moneylenders in the template will not allow. So look to the altar of your own devotions and dedications in life and see that all is facing in one unified purpose - for if not, your dial is set to another channel and doublespeak is all that will be heard. It really is a matter of choice - and not coercion - but to know that one has to step out of the framework of a coercive deception. This goes far beyond the particulars of the political shenanigans - yet is contained within it and within all that likewise teaches fear as its power and protector and its god.
Fear must be faced within a true accounting for a grounded and true perspective to emerge. Proxy parents who seek to make children in their own image" deny the very power of living in exchange for delusions of power that evaporate as quickly as they arise. They also become intolerably burdened with controlling what is completely beyond control. Life is not coercion. But we are free to choose to give our power away to that which then gives back in the same measure we give out. True governance must serve the whole - not the notional security of the undue influence of a private agenda which cares nothing whatsoever for aught but itself and sacrifices its own as easily. This indeed is 'locked in' and cannot or dare not even imagine escape.
The ancients said 'as above, so below' speaking originally of the Creative that we might call 'within' but not within our framework of thinking. But a within from which one can observe the thoughts that otherwise deceive. The politics of our world will reflect the politics of our consciousness and our true freedom is not to rearrange the political furniture but to embrace a communication within our own being in which coercion is put aside. For the two are mutually exclusive. If truth is the first casualty of war - then no less is war is the first casualty of truth. If it is not a war - then it is a belief in war being played out by deception. The idea of deception is not a new one - but the height of folly is to presume the deceiver left our mind when we decided we were rational beings. Reason is a sanity of heart and mind as one. A truly joyful and extending presence does not need to define truth, but shares it wordlessly and can listen to people of every kind of tongue.
Friday, 24 October 2014
Insanity feeds itself in your name if you let it
The way the ebola issue is being used is a symptom of a disease in our media and whatever actually operates in place of governance.
Ron Paul wrote a short piece here. I felt to write this to a wider view of the whole situation that synchonistically I called the war on Is.
- - -
- - -
A war against Is...
is a mad mind at war with itself - that forgets that I Am.
True liberty is not overcoming the evil so much as being free of the fear of evil by which it perpetuates a war against Is. (Itself)
Fear operates contagion in the unwary. To let fear propagate and use YOUR mind for its botnet, you have to trade in your free will for a tyrannous compulsion that SAYS it will give you power, protect or defend you. Perhaps it seems like a good idea at the time.
Consciously owned fear is not given permission to be reactive reactive, because one knows that it would come from what is not true of oneself. There is a natural wisdom of pausing and considering that rests or puts aside the mind of compulsively driven thinking (fear) and opens to a wider perspective. A sort of innate innocent allowing and curiosity as to what is actually going on right here where conflicting thought seems to need to resolve or clarify.
Fear is a device used by manipulators who themselves are thus manipulated. But once truly baited into its identifications, one only sees the options it provides.
Belief is powerful because the mind is powerful. What one DOES believe DOES dictate one's experience. It also defends itself against exposure to awareness as the attempt to hide the fear, hide in fear, and use fear to stay hidden. A mind divided against itself cannot stand - but has to be persistently propped up.
The State can return to a function of facilitation rather than control. The private sector can awaken to that nothing is ultimately private and thus communicative at some level. Attempts to lock in a segregated state of self AGAINST change is not peace but DEEP FEAR. This is witnessed by the reflections of a violating terror that seems to an an external agent or agency of an evil - be it of breakdowns of communication with others of breakdowns in natural systems or of the fear of evil itself giving rise to distorted narratives that read everything in their own self-validating sense of ... fear.
Good Housekeeping. On every level of our being; spiritual, mental, physical, relational. It is neither left or right or any other persuasion - but in aligning with what truly belongs here in the true of your now, and sweeping out what does not, it may likely appear every shade of opinion over time.
I appreciate Ron Paul's willingness to be true to his heartfelt convictions and extend a practical communication rather than feeding the fear that so many are using as a protection racket.
Thursday, 23 October 2014
Terror devizes division
Divide and rule is the modus operandi of a wish for power. It can be readily observed as an almost invisible norm of coercive intent in one's own mind and is reflected in our world writ large in every contention that serves a hidden agenda or 3rd party interest.
A unified resolve must stem from a unified appreciation. This does NOT arise from reaction, but from a true pause FROM reaction so as to allow connection with the wholeness of one's being and thus discern the wholeness of the situation, one step at a time - and not in a 'package' of 'measures and protections' that undermine liberty, trust and communication, for a sense of managing perception in 'righteous' appeal to the fearfully unsettled.
Sometimes history reveals events that are staged or secretly set up or encouraged. Things are not always what they at first seem. One has to actually be free to investigate and share the findings rather than repeat or reactively assume anyone's story. We increasingly live imaginatively without really checking in. Such is the attempt to then coerce and manage PERCEPTIONS that the actual events and relations are subordinated to a coercive narrative. The liar falls into believing their own lies. This is how corruption operates.
Terrorism is also used as a device by which to control one's population and consolidate power. It can also be the anger and hatred of those who find a "justified" target to aim their powerlessness at, but these 'movements' are also nurtured and fed in shadow strategies that are supposed to serve notional interest around the globe.
Within such times it is perhaps impossible to know what is actually occurring in specific incidents. But one can observe the WAY news is presented and the WAY that authorities speak and act and thus discern the coercive attempt to CONTROL the narrative. This may be simply fearful on their part - and ultimately MUST be for only fear is coercive upon the truth of others - and often operates along channels of a fearful self interest amidst the dictates of the established patterns of power.
Owning our fears is a step into seeing clearly. The demand or expectation of being protected from our fears GIVES POWER to that which would come forth to hide and assert a narrative of power over others.
'We' can be used as a false unity of assertion of such power, and the sense of powerlessness that knows not who it is, can succumb to such seduction without even a moment of noticing.
- - -
Comment to the above: "Denial"
- - -
War demands truth be denied.
For truth is not a weapon - but an honesty of being.
The thirst for war operates denial of truth.
Wars with words attempt to shape opinion and condition reaction.
But when one notices a coercive intent that is trying to tell you how to feel or how to interpret, you can deny its authority in your heart and listen and discern what comes up to your own curiosity and interest.
Political and corporate corruption seek to exploit everything to their own agenda, some of which pretends to offer a service or represent your interests.
Cultural challenges are to be met with cultural renewal in some genuine expression of transformation. The attempt to break everything down in order to remake it as a new world order of a particular agenda is the failed ideology of coercing or imposing a will upon others. It is not how life works, it is how war works and how a war economy works.
Terror imprinted upon the mind is how mind control works.
The disintegration of identity, family, community, nation and culture operates through the intent to by pass or neutralise the checks and balances and natural resistance of a healthy body politic just as parasites have evolved ways of by passing or turning off our immune system and in a sense replace our thoughts with their own.
There are various factors operating in any scenario that are not accounted for or acknowledged in the narrative of those who seek to use it to reinforce their own justifications for existence.
There are huge amounts of money involved in 'war on terror' and geopolitical dominance of resources. But the money is evaporating from actual wealth to debt and death and sickness. We let ourselves be deceived. Being baited and triggered into fear makes us easy to manipulate, by framing everything in a narrative that makes the outcome predictable. One can use it all to wake up from identifying within the ideas that are propagated or triggered and actually look at them - and then live out from a less reactive and more grounded perspective.
It isn't that there is nothing to address but that the way we are addressing something IS the expression and communication of culture.
If every violent crime is defined as terrorism one can start using every such event to induce national paralysis, shutdowns and the introductions of martial law in disguise. There are dangers to address - but it is never as the 'wolf' cryer would have us believe, and some 'cures' are much more dangerous than the disease itself. In fact such mad agendas are aimed at medicalising wellness and redefining free communication outside the official narrative as potential terrorism and thus subjecting all to a militarised and oppressive society. There's nothing sane about any of it. But that which wakes to acknowledge insanity must be itself a spark of Reason. And the basis of a better way than being held hostage to fear by gunmen or governments.
- - -
Comment to the above: "Denial"
- - -
War demands truth be denied.
For truth is not a weapon - but an honesty of being.
The thirst for war operates denial of truth.
Wars with words attempt to shape opinion and condition reaction.
But when one notices a coercive intent that is trying to tell you how to feel or how to interpret, you can deny its authority in your heart and listen and discern what comes up to your own curiosity and interest.
Political and corporate corruption seek to exploit everything to their own agenda, some of which pretends to offer a service or represent your interests.
Cultural challenges are to be met with cultural renewal in some genuine expression of transformation. The attempt to break everything down in order to remake it as a new world order of a particular agenda is the failed ideology of coercing or imposing a will upon others. It is not how life works, it is how war works and how a war economy works.
Terror imprinted upon the mind is how mind control works.
The disintegration of identity, family, community, nation and culture operates through the intent to by pass or neutralise the checks and balances and natural resistance of a healthy body politic just as parasites have evolved ways of by passing or turning off our immune system and in a sense replace our thoughts with their own.
There are various factors operating in any scenario that are not accounted for or acknowledged in the narrative of those who seek to use it to reinforce their own justifications for existence.
There are huge amounts of money involved in 'war on terror' and geopolitical dominance of resources. But the money is evaporating from actual wealth to debt and death and sickness. We let ourselves be deceived. Being baited and triggered into fear makes us easy to manipulate, by framing everything in a narrative that makes the outcome predictable. One can use it all to wake up from identifying within the ideas that are propagated or triggered and actually look at them - and then live out from a less reactive and more grounded perspective.
It isn't that there is nothing to address but that the way we are addressing something IS the expression and communication of culture.
If every violent crime is defined as terrorism one can start using every such event to induce national paralysis, shutdowns and the introductions of martial law in disguise. There are dangers to address - but it is never as the 'wolf' cryer would have us believe, and some 'cures' are much more dangerous than the disease itself. In fact such mad agendas are aimed at medicalising wellness and redefining free communication outside the official narrative as potential terrorism and thus subjecting all to a militarised and oppressive society. There's nothing sane about any of it. But that which wakes to acknowledge insanity must be itself a spark of Reason. And the basis of a better way than being held hostage to fear by gunmen or governments.
Friday, 13 June 2014
Uncovering the fear that would hide in conflict
Google News brought up this article on reintroducing the 'snooper's charter' in a provincial news source.
I felt to comment:
The search for intelligence is the demonstration one does not have it.
A fundamentally flawed apprehension of a situation will logically extend itself and thus reinforce its premise. When the ends (as fear dictates them) - are used to justify the means (as fear provides them), fear is made the substitute for love's honesty.
The more one engages in using a focus on fear to validate and justify one's own self-righteous hate, the more deeply entangled one becomes in lies and deceits - such as to no longer be defending anything of value - but to have accepted and spread contagion into the larger society.
While one furthers an ever escalating 'war' with an ever mutating 'enemy', terror is enacted upon one's own people. This is not an accidental outcome but is the work of those who see their personal interests as being furthered by such destructions of culture and idea as would hold them in check or undo their threat to the well-being of all.
Reaction does not ask anew and so in not listening to the answer - but restating its own premise over and over and over again. Such a mentality is a conditioned programming that defends against being itself exposed - for it equates itself with meeting the true Need and so works largely in secret in case this self-asserting right to power be taken from it. Such is the 'Dictatorship' delusion.
There is so much Intelligence as to how society can bloom and prosper, but vested interests hate and fear it because it does not validate or reinforce their power.
The crucifixion of the essential Innocence of Humanity as Consciousness is not in the past - but in the Now - and the symbol embedded in our psyche is a wayshowing to a more honest appreciation - free from the distortion of the endlessly warring personae.
The establishment cannot repent. Only individuals can wake to a mistake and forsake it. But the established order is a collective reflection of the world we each choose. If we choose to hide our fear, we will hide in fear. That's how it works. While populations demand protection from fear, they give their power to governance that presumes to 'save them'. But fear's dictate pervades and oversees all that is within its domain and ensures a plentiful supply of threat in false positive inflations as well as via negative losses.
What then is the answer to fear and its progeny? Asking the question is a start! Asking honestly in the heart. Noticing our own part in setting up the situation, our own part in holding conflicting and competing goals, our own part in so many ways that serve up the scenario that victimhood would cry foul, and justify loving to hate.
Worship is not with the lips or the words - but with what we energise and accept and validate as our experience - as the core beliefs and definitions that dictate such choices, and as our primary definition of our self in relation to our world and each other.
We do not recognize the progeny of our own thinking coming home to us - yet they carry a message that alone will serve an awakening to a false thinking. Only such awakening allows a true shift of perspective.
We have every right to say NO to that which has no legitimacy in our true being - and indeed will lose sight of our integrity if we don't say NO - in whatever way is appropriate to the need. The way in which we communicate and act needs to express integrity or it will be perceived as lacking presence.
A lack of presence invites the projection of fears. Secrecy implies shame of an evil intent. Unaccountability creates the conditions in which there are no checks and balances to the evil intent that hides in good intentions. Power corrupts when it is not rooted in a truly shared integrity.
The mob cannot and will not understand anything but what they are conditioned to understand - but the individual can be communicated with that abides uniquely in everyone.
Consciousness responsibility is never too late to bring into play. Even - especially! - upon a deathbed or amidst conflict.
I felt to comment:
The search for intelligence is the demonstration one does not have it.
A fundamentally flawed apprehension of a situation will logically extend itself and thus reinforce its premise. When the ends (as fear dictates them) - are used to justify the means (as fear provides them), fear is made the substitute for love's honesty.
The more one engages in using a focus on fear to validate and justify one's own self-righteous hate, the more deeply entangled one becomes in lies and deceits - such as to no longer be defending anything of value - but to have accepted and spread contagion into the larger society.
While one furthers an ever escalating 'war' with an ever mutating 'enemy', terror is enacted upon one's own people. This is not an accidental outcome but is the work of those who see their personal interests as being furthered by such destructions of culture and idea as would hold them in check or undo their threat to the well-being of all.
Reaction does not ask anew and so in not listening to the answer - but restating its own premise over and over and over again. Such a mentality is a conditioned programming that defends against being itself exposed - for it equates itself with meeting the true Need and so works largely in secret in case this self-asserting right to power be taken from it. Such is the 'Dictatorship' delusion.
There is so much Intelligence as to how society can bloom and prosper, but vested interests hate and fear it because it does not validate or reinforce their power.
The crucifixion of the essential Innocence of Humanity as Consciousness is not in the past - but in the Now - and the symbol embedded in our psyche is a wayshowing to a more honest appreciation - free from the distortion of the endlessly warring personae.
The establishment cannot repent. Only individuals can wake to a mistake and forsake it. But the established order is a collective reflection of the world we each choose. If we choose to hide our fear, we will hide in fear. That's how it works. While populations demand protection from fear, they give their power to governance that presumes to 'save them'. But fear's dictate pervades and oversees all that is within its domain and ensures a plentiful supply of threat in false positive inflations as well as via negative losses.
What then is the answer to fear and its progeny? Asking the question is a start! Asking honestly in the heart. Noticing our own part in setting up the situation, our own part in holding conflicting and competing goals, our own part in so many ways that serve up the scenario that victimhood would cry foul, and justify loving to hate.
Worship is not with the lips or the words - but with what we energise and accept and validate as our experience - as the core beliefs and definitions that dictate such choices, and as our primary definition of our self in relation to our world and each other.
We do not recognize the progeny of our own thinking coming home to us - yet they carry a message that alone will serve an awakening to a false thinking. Only such awakening allows a true shift of perspective.
We have every right to say NO to that which has no legitimacy in our true being - and indeed will lose sight of our integrity if we don't say NO - in whatever way is appropriate to the need. The way in which we communicate and act needs to express integrity or it will be perceived as lacking presence.
A lack of presence invites the projection of fears. Secrecy implies shame of an evil intent. Unaccountability creates the conditions in which there are no checks and balances to the evil intent that hides in good intentions. Power corrupts when it is not rooted in a truly shared integrity.
The mob cannot and will not understand anything but what they are conditioned to understand - but the individual can be communicated with that abides uniquely in everyone.
Consciousness responsibility is never too late to bring into play. Even - especially! - upon a deathbed or amidst conflict.
Wednesday, 10 July 2013
The war of terror and the making of history
Occasionally he’d stroll across the field to chat to his eldest son and admire his cow, while munching on an apple and some chocolate
Be acutely aware that you cannot expect reliable news coverage of anything to to with the 'war of terror' being waged against our minds - if we suck into it. History is being made... indeed.
The Bin Laden family are VERY close to the Bush family. (One random example of many) When all planes were grounded on 9/11, an exception was made for the Bin Laden family to escape the actual physical company of the Bush family.
Oil is central to the world power struggles and the markets and power of influence of the supplier/pusher make any other kind of drug induced corruption insignificant - even if all added together.
Corruption is when one loses one's integrity for a false promise of power or self protection. Without integrity, power struggle replaces a unity and all that seems to be on the table is war - through 'fair' means or foul - but when the masks no longer deceive - only the foul can be seen.
In the sheer insanity of war, the mind screams out for integrity - for a basis of meaning that restores sanity. But in the masquerade that collapses to reveal the most heartless intent, all go righteously in unconscious reaction.
Anyone public tends to be remade in the image of the media - and the mind of the masses. Their symbolic use in the collective mind is created and their actual existence ignored. This is not just terrorists and celebs - it is you and I. We have no real existence in such a world but only what can be got from us. A heartless intent that sets up and destroys as its whim decrees.
As long as this heartless intent can be masked or seen for the most part on the OTHER - then it can be killed over and over - while luring the mind to believe its own relative innocence and allowing it to be suggestible to manipulations that purport to provide 'protection'.
But the attempt to control life, other people, the world, only leads to a more and more out of control situation - at ever deeper levels of madness. There is a better way, but the voice for self-specialness will not allow or accept it, so we have to be willing to release it or put it behind us by not being drawn into reaction, but standing in a shared sense of value.
Don't give in to the terrorists - the fear-mongers, the hate-sellers and grievance grocers.
Find a place in calm that can communicate or simply relate without war.
We seem powerless in the world no matter how unacceptable it is becoming - and yet we are not powerless in our thinking, in our choices and in our honesty.
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
Droning on about terror
Perhaps the underside of the US military is the belly of the global corporate interests that essentially own and run the USA - and as far as they can - the world.
The so called American Way of Life that they aggressively defend is not the Dream as peddled to the masses - not any real freedom of creative expression but a very tightly defended grip on power and wealth - based not on divine principle of growing a commonwealth of nations, but by force and guile - whatever presentation the Emperor might want to be seen to be wearing.
However, apart from the willingness to 'call it for what it is' instead of passively complying with untruth, the real issue remains the mindset that - though writ large in world affairs - is yet within each and all of us as a microcosm of the whole. As long as we WANT to see an evil entirely outside our own mind then we continue to use it to justify being a power against it. We define ourselves OVER and AGAINST in order to justify a private agenda. This underlying pattern needs to be uncovered or it runs like a background program that dictates the framework in which we think.
The belief in enemies is the refusal to communicate and the fear of communication is the refusal of love, and the fear of love is the fear of the loss of the private agenda of control. Unless we address this, then whoever is 'in power' it will essentially run a variation of a mind of deceit. While it may sound totally foolish or naive to suggest that there is any alternative to power politics, it none the less opens a way for a fresh perspective in which creative inspiration can reveal better ways of communicating, creative ways of undoing the roots conflict - which is firstly, in our minds, but hidden.
We teach by example and learn by what we teach. To teach that prevailing force is power is to learn to be prevailed upon. My Grandma thought civilisation was just a veneer over a beast - but that is socialisation. Civilisation establishes the conditions by law based on principle in which the conditions are held in which the law of the heart can awaken. When the law is remade in our own image - chaos ensues, but this is not the call to impose law upon chaos - but to embody the law of the heart in our civil society - including the rule of law.
The heart is the voice for wholeness and unified purpose. There is no wisdom in remote assassinations without a process of law being seen to be upheld.
Alas, we become our enemy - and hurt ourselves in a madness born of an ignorance, defended against awareness. There is a limit to tolerance for pain that allows a deeper honesty to surface by which the very ground changes.
I feel the Ground is changing and that the changes are affecting us all - including those in positions of trust and power in society.
Certainly the lunatics are in here - but they depend on darkness to hold any power in our mind. We see denied fear and guilt outside us as if it is 'others', but this is the effect of denying the light of true feeling awareness in order to pursue a lust for power - for control over our mind - and our world and our brother. That then 'creates' a situation in which we seem to need such power to save us!
Its a self fuelling and self-defeating circle.
---------------
Why - (asked a reader) is there so LITTLE coverage of the drone issue in the media?
Because power that speaks across the world with sudden death is a fearful thing and to be seen to challenge it is to be identifiable as a potential target to a tyranny from which one cannot escape.
And the power that uses fire and missiles also uses information - and in a way and at a level never dreamed of before.
To speak truth to power is to share freedom of Spirit. There are better ways. Drones are suicidal for the USA because they undermine its integrity and credibility as acts of terror - which multiply the very thing they are supposed to defend against.
This is not something that the powers governing the USA are unaware of and has been going on since the fall of the USSR. War drives the economy and gives justification for usurping power.
Also, journalism is rare in a the information explosion and corporate models of business strip everything back for maximum profit regardless of what the business is dealing in. There is little 'market value' accorded to the work involved in researching and writing real news - so it is starting to become a labour of love that feels the value of giving it, regardless of market and social trends!
I don't know President Obama. For sure he has to make a lot of shit decisions every day because so often there is the least worst option rather than a clear good one. Perhaps he believes it is tough love - to communicate an overwhelming intent to those who would practice acts of aggression to US Interests. But that is not how it is perceived by enemies or friends nor many US citizens. Sovereignty is no more - unless you are either to big to upset or too cosy to need to. Technology has always been utilized for war on all levels - and the new technology will enable war in ways unimaginable. And the folks who make it want to sell it - to make us all safe!
These comments were into an article by Bill Moyers titled The Hubris of the Drones on
The so called American Way of Life that they aggressively defend is not the Dream as peddled to the masses - not any real freedom of creative expression but a very tightly defended grip on power and wealth - based not on divine principle of growing a commonwealth of nations, but by force and guile - whatever presentation the Emperor might want to be seen to be wearing.
However, apart from the willingness to 'call it for what it is' instead of passively complying with untruth, the real issue remains the mindset that - though writ large in world affairs - is yet within each and all of us as a microcosm of the whole. As long as we WANT to see an evil entirely outside our own mind then we continue to use it to justify being a power against it. We define ourselves OVER and AGAINST in order to justify a private agenda. This underlying pattern needs to be uncovered or it runs like a background program that dictates the framework in which we think.
The belief in enemies is the refusal to communicate and the fear of communication is the refusal of love, and the fear of love is the fear of the loss of the private agenda of control. Unless we address this, then whoever is 'in power' it will essentially run a variation of a mind of deceit. While it may sound totally foolish or naive to suggest that there is any alternative to power politics, it none the less opens a way for a fresh perspective in which creative inspiration can reveal better ways of communicating, creative ways of undoing the roots conflict - which is firstly, in our minds, but hidden.
We teach by example and learn by what we teach. To teach that prevailing force is power is to learn to be prevailed upon. My Grandma thought civilisation was just a veneer over a beast - but that is socialisation. Civilisation establishes the conditions by law based on principle in which the conditions are held in which the law of the heart can awaken. When the law is remade in our own image - chaos ensues, but this is not the call to impose law upon chaos - but to embody the law of the heart in our civil society - including the rule of law.
The heart is the voice for wholeness and unified purpose. There is no wisdom in remote assassinations without a process of law being seen to be upheld.
Alas, we become our enemy - and hurt ourselves in a madness born of an ignorance, defended against awareness. There is a limit to tolerance for pain that allows a deeper honesty to surface by which the very ground changes.
I feel the Ground is changing and that the changes are affecting us all - including those in positions of trust and power in society.
Certainly the lunatics are in here - but they depend on darkness to hold any power in our mind. We see denied fear and guilt outside us as if it is 'others', but this is the effect of denying the light of true feeling awareness in order to pursue a lust for power - for control over our mind - and our world and our brother. That then 'creates' a situation in which we seem to need such power to save us!
Its a self fuelling and self-defeating circle.
---------------
Why - (asked a reader) is there so LITTLE coverage of the drone issue in the media?
Because power that speaks across the world with sudden death is a fearful thing and to be seen to challenge it is to be identifiable as a potential target to a tyranny from which one cannot escape.
And the power that uses fire and missiles also uses information - and in a way and at a level never dreamed of before.
To speak truth to power is to share freedom of Spirit. There are better ways. Drones are suicidal for the USA because they undermine its integrity and credibility as acts of terror - which multiply the very thing they are supposed to defend against.
This is not something that the powers governing the USA are unaware of and has been going on since the fall of the USSR. War drives the economy and gives justification for usurping power.
Also, journalism is rare in a the information explosion and corporate models of business strip everything back for maximum profit regardless of what the business is dealing in. There is little 'market value' accorded to the work involved in researching and writing real news - so it is starting to become a labour of love that feels the value of giving it, regardless of market and social trends!
I don't know President Obama. For sure he has to make a lot of shit decisions every day because so often there is the least worst option rather than a clear good one. Perhaps he believes it is tough love - to communicate an overwhelming intent to those who would practice acts of aggression to US Interests. But that is not how it is perceived by enemies or friends nor many US citizens. Sovereignty is no more - unless you are either to big to upset or too cosy to need to. Technology has always been utilized for war on all levels - and the new technology will enable war in ways unimaginable. And the folks who make it want to sell it - to make us all safe!
These comments were into an article by Bill Moyers titled The Hubris of the Drones on
Thursday, 31 May 2012
The power to kill remotely, anywhere at anytime - under the aegis of 'war on terror'
Fear is not the basis of culture, nor the protector or guide to the renewal and upholding of that culture. But it would coerce our minds to believe it was.
Fear is taken advantage of and even directly triggered or fuelled by manipulative intent to control minds. It is very effective in seducing its wielders into a sense of having power - and using it to serve personal or private agendas.
To 'legitimize' assassination at will of anyone, anywhere by technological means is first introduced by the US, but will be implemented by other 'powers' as they get their supply of weapons systems. The use of such weapons illegitimizes the power that wields it by revealing the brute will at work, divorced from any kind of process of communication or appeal.
The only counter to technology of such capacities is transparency of information, and a process of communication that disarms deception by refusing to collude in it. At some point this may result in being branded a terroristor some equivalent 'status' and being dehumanized and 'processed' accordingly.
Fear is on both sides of every conflict and plays to keep the game of conflict/control going. But the real enemy is not where fear points to - but your own fearful thoughts believed true.
If politics has failed, it is only in its present forms - for human relationships and organizations have always been conflicted between communication and control. Whatever the world may seem to play out, we each are able to make peace within by choosing a true communication in which fears can be observed and dissolved - rather than hidden and allowed to 'control' in the dark.
The way to shake off evil influences is to become wholly harmless. This does not mean the removal of force from the range of our communication - but desisting from employing hate and fear as our intent amidst disguise of righteousness.
The change that is called for is in the hearts and minds of those who see the nature of the deception and recognize their own part in it.
Those who are without the proclivity to 'sin' do not throw stones, but seek a true communication - with both hands above the table!
The embodiment of an evil will or intent, invites psuedo religious righteousness in opposition to that evil. For that is how one covers over and distracts from a self-sense of invalidity or illegitimacy.
Criminal acts require proportionate response. The 'war on terror' is really a war on Sanity itself. While each plays out their own part in an insanity, it seems to make reality support their own delusions.
There is an alternate to fighting the shadow of a hated aspect of our own mind, but not if one does not WANT to find it!
In Peace
Brian
Fear is taken advantage of and even directly triggered or fuelled by manipulative intent to control minds. It is very effective in seducing its wielders into a sense of having power - and using it to serve personal or private agendas.
To 'legitimize' assassination at will of anyone, anywhere by technological means is first introduced by the US, but will be implemented by other 'powers' as they get their supply of weapons systems. The use of such weapons illegitimizes the power that wields it by revealing the brute will at work, divorced from any kind of process of communication or appeal.
The only counter to technology of such capacities is transparency of information, and a process of communication that disarms deception by refusing to collude in it. At some point this may result in being branded a terroristor some equivalent 'status' and being dehumanized and 'processed' accordingly.
Fear is on both sides of every conflict and plays to keep the game of conflict/control going. But the real enemy is not where fear points to - but your own fearful thoughts believed true.
If politics has failed, it is only in its present forms - for human relationships and organizations have always been conflicted between communication and control. Whatever the world may seem to play out, we each are able to make peace within by choosing a true communication in which fears can be observed and dissolved - rather than hidden and allowed to 'control' in the dark.
The way to shake off evil influences is to become wholly harmless. This does not mean the removal of force from the range of our communication - but desisting from employing hate and fear as our intent amidst disguise of righteousness.
The change that is called for is in the hearts and minds of those who see the nature of the deception and recognize their own part in it.
Those who are without the proclivity to 'sin' do not throw stones, but seek a true communication - with both hands above the table!
The embodiment of an evil will or intent, invites psuedo religious righteousness in opposition to that evil. For that is how one covers over and distracts from a self-sense of invalidity or illegitimacy.
Criminal acts require proportionate response. The 'war on terror' is really a war on Sanity itself. While each plays out their own part in an insanity, it seems to make reality support their own delusions.
There is an alternate to fighting the shadow of a hated aspect of our own mind, but not if one does not WANT to find it!
In Peace
Brian
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)