Opening the Book on Gain of Function Research

 https://viroliegy.com/2022/11/18/closing-the-book-on-gain-of-fiction-with-dr-tom-cowan/comment-page-1/

 

A war mind seeks gain of function from anything and everything.
When it became apparent that biological ie germ or virus based weapons failed to work, the switch to toxic agents or radiative exposures  that could pass off as an 'infection' and be 'leveraged' by crafted or planted hype, the ability to run the 'biological weapon research' as plausible defence against Others using 'pathogenic' weapons maintained COVER for 'dark research' without the normal checks and balances of accountability to law, under pretext of national (or global) security. IE as a masked agenda that also spins off viotech corporations offering 'solutions' to fears cast to or flagged as 'contagious'.
The GoF for a destructive agenda working for plunder and control worked from the fear and belief in contagious and deadly pathogens cannot be underestimated. So look past the cheap satisfaction of 'disproving' but one facet of a mindset that IS a masked agenda wreaking sickness, pain, loss and death under 'medical' functions.

The ego, of a self taken in image, masked and distanced for its survival runs GoF as its survival. That is it seeks to assign to itself attributes that boost its sense of self - as well as divert the negatives of such a usurping as guilting of others, so as to gain from another's loss.
What is our true function as wholeness but joy in being?
What is the usurping (dys) function of a split sense of self but to mask over the split so as to present a face of control that passes off as real to others, so as to avoid conflicts, and also to operate secret thought and intent behind a social mask.

Unless the underlying context is taken into account the 'modelling' of our thought assumes self-interest to align in a common good. But which 'self' is actually being asserted and protected?

A sense of self-conflict can drive fear of fear to seek a comfortable definition or diagnosis by which to be 'made safe' in thought, regardless being hindered from healing or even poisoned and killed under standard of care.

An example is the bio-genetic research using 'virological narrative model' as its justification for developing applications to 'transfect' synthetic proteins into living cells. That the virus narrative is unfounded doesn't stop the development of its shift from real but unfounf agents to to a genetically defined construct from which every kind of spinoff can be 'developed' out of Rorschach blot experimentation - not just as the marketing of 'genetics' but the intent and attempt to create a man-made hack using hydrogels, nano tech and RF. GoF is the seedbed for this 'development'.
Again - regardless of whether ANY of it actually works is secondary to hyping investment, directing research and using it to launch platforms through which to manage or feed from a captive revenue stream. By the time the damage shows up, others are left holding the can, or an other variation of deceit  is generated to divert and capture attention.

Solipsism; Are you the dreamer of your own dream?

John Carter

Solipsism: From the perspective of the EGO, there is NOTHING else. No other minds, nothing outside itself. It is GOD and SELF. That should be the true definition of Solipsism - to include EGO as the point of view.

 

 Hang on! ...There is a sense of being excluded or deprived that drives it to get it for itself and be seen by others to have it. The ego is the belief in a separate mind, which by definition is othered or distanced from 'othered' mind, or 'world-mind'. Compartmentalised meanings that all reflect back witnesses to being alone and apart. If solipsism was taken to Mind rather than self-thinking- alone, it would find no self apart but only relational exchange, and so would recoil from Infinity to get its normal back ;-)

 

The ego sense of wanting to "belong" and "be seen/appreciated" is the ego insisting on being revered. But, since it considers "out there" to be the same as "in here" (what is portrayed on the canvas/dashboard is the only reality), then it can only be revered by itself. It amounts to the ego proclaiming that it is "that" which created "all that is" and then insisting on an approving audience that is "other." Wait! That sounds an awful lot like the God of the Old Testament.

 

There is a critical difference; God knows all in one and one in all. This is to truly know and be known. Only apparent separation generates longing from a love that needed no name until replaced by imaged symbol (ego). The substitution for Reality runs a fragmented or distanced and masked version as attack on God. (Ego) running unconscious - hence your narcissistic sketch. Beneath appearances is the true unconscious wellspring of a Creation that is at the same 'time' superconscious. That is to say it's Life Jim, but not as we know it.
We are not self-creating, but the illusion of such a self-world runs in its own mythic prequel - that is we create the past (or father) that supports and justifies our currently accepted self-acceptance or assertion. Our Mythic consciousness of Self, God & World underlies our narrative identity–not as a fixed template but as a transformable 'structure' or complex of acquired and inherited definitions and beliefs - most of which are unconscious or masked.