#1
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-189261
Perhaps
the sense of being betrayed and lied to generates a hasty refusal of
others beating the same drum or on the same sore points.
There are those who for their own reasons actively WANT the fear agenda to be justified.
There
are others who do not WANT it - unless such alarm can be demonstrated
genuine AND the call to action be sane, proportionate and deeply and
widely considered.
If you give priority to any potential threat
and assign it funding and attention over all else, we can 'discover'
ever more strands to its story. If doing so is a reinforcement of our
own masking identity, social status, funding, career or sense of
self-worth, then we have a conflict of interest that may be running
beneath our own conscious attention yet clearly visible to others or to
any study of our behaviours.
While a few get emotional in reaction here at times, I'd say this is a very tolerant comment forum.
The
medical fact as to what is or is not going on may be in question, but
no one denies clinical conditions are occurring, and that any incidence
of disease can have ongoing effects or represent a chronic lack of
health for a variety of reasons. But the reaction to the last - and this
coming season of respiratory disease under the umbrella of Covid-19,
is far far more definitely threatening to life and liberty than any
medical condition in living history outside world war. This point
doesn't register with those who come across to me as covid fanatics. For
they have found the purpose and the meaning of their life in its 'war'.
But who exactly is being flattened and controlled?
I see a sense
of certainty being given more priority that anything to do with truth.
Such that if it feeds such a sense of certainty it is woven into
'officially asserted and enforced truth'.
How dangerous is covid-19?
This depends on whether we see it as part of the way people die every
year, or whether we see it as a leverage to gain and maintain control
over the living, under pretext of 'making us safe'.
The urgent
need I see is to withdraw support for the lockdowning 'virus
controlling' reaction that runs like an inflammation in the body
politic. Apologists may concede it could have been proportionate back at
the beginning. I do not. But it is either a suicidal reaction now - or
delivering those seeking protection to the 'Morlocks'.
(Referring the H.G Wells anticipation of a predator class).
#2
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-189324
Rosie
Isn't
it the case now that if something is censored / deleted on social media
you can be sure that s because it s the truth!! Paradoxically these
fact chuckers are confirming truth in their own upside down way!!!
To Rosie:
Can you?
Associations
with 5g are censored but is that because 5g is considered so vital to
the next step in the control agenda that nothing bar nothing can be
allowed to impede it regardless any possible effect that may or may
not contribute to a degradation of health in some or many.
But if
something is censored it may point to some sort of hidden bias or
agenda, and operate a negative conditioning. However, this can also be
used to generate and opposition that can be nurtured and brought out
later as another narrative leverage.
Rachael Carson s book,
Silent Spring came out of Rockefeller backed institution and avoided the
direct effect of pesticides and herbicides on human beings (and there
is such a history to this day), this was considered a seminal work in
growing an environmental movement that nowadays (generally) considered
Nature a weak and bankable victim, and humans a virus on the planet.
Those with the most to lose and the means to protect it look into the future and hedge all bets.
Everything
has to be carefully considered in it context and if that context is
an emotionally invested or establishment protected narrative, then
truth includes the use of story and emotional investment as leveraging
by stealth and guile.
The ability to maintain control by force
depends on community support. I don t support the narrative for
lockdowns and biosecurity states, enslavement and retrogression of human
beings as stock , data or resources for genetic experimentation. Yet I
see that under fear, these ends are being established by consent.
I
don t engage in relationship with open and obvious deceits such as
fact checking sites, and other controlled assets or hapless proxies to
deceit.
#3
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-189534
The
victors of Wars and Crashes are the banking cartels, the military
industrial complex, now extending to the medical industrial complex - or
'biosecurity state'. it is not about money - excepting as a means of
control - ie debt.
Sell the control agenda as the means to end war,
colonialism, racism, gender discrimination or ANYTHING that can set a
carrot and a stick in front of the resentful and aggrieved, and you have
the funding, influence and favour from the top down, to sow whatever
crop and harvest as you will.
I agree that there is a self-hating
suicidal impulse in human psyche that is usually masked over except of
course in those who are 'taken over' by its pain, but now is common as
the idea of overpopulation, humans as viruses or as a cancer on the
planet and etc.
Another factor is that when when we get stuck and
cannot move consciously through the blockage, we necessitate crisis
that force the issue. Modern thinking seems willing to manufacture and
engineer such 'crisis' under the belief that it can be controlled, or at
least best survived from an insider perspective. If this is so then
there are those among us who are extremely excited to be controlling
human 'destiny' - even if the means to do so is acting out a false
narrative for reasons they believe justified - OR - cannot go back on or
escape now that they are committed?
Money is nothing in itself. The
richest in money terms have the largest flowthrough. Actual wealth is in
tangible assets. Money is set to be radically restructured any time
soon. Cypriots woke one day to find their bank accounts had government
'bonds' in place of what they took to be their money.
A commenter
above said - 'those who make the gold make the rules'. There is
something in that when 'gold' is the supply of choking off of life
support.
The rich are not all intent on seeking to use wealth to gain
ever more control over those poorer, but they will seek to protect
against losing what they have and can be manipulated and used in the
same way - by cultivating fears, dangling 'carrots' and making 'deals'.
Organised
crime is simply 'normal, and largely masked over. I think it is
increasing unsupportable by the complex demands of its own lies - as a
'House of Cards' yet 'too big to fail' - and so everyone and everything
ELSE has to fail - as a severe contraction or Economic activity and
massive limitation and degradation of consciousness.
I can understand
a need to change. I cannot accept and join in completely loveless and
deceitful means. Those two characterise my sense of the 'old normal'.
Masking in virtue is nothing new.
#4
JD said:
“Sense of certainty” works both ways. Welcome to humanity.
I
discern a difference between a fear driven reaction (or a fear masking
action), and the peace of a calm and clear relational appreciation. A
doctor may tell you that you are going to die, but what you then choose
to do is your human decision and not a medical dictate. Now that 'Doctor
WHO' tells us we are going to kill others - regardless our clinical
condition, we are being guilted and bullied to effectively kill our
Economy - or life support system.
So while I am certain that
lockdowns are unhelpful and destructive (apart from as a means to
condition new normals of surveillance, compliance and enforcement), I am
by no means certain that those who WANT such a world will accept
freedom or responsibility for themselves or extend it to others.
'Certainty'
as I see it is a truly or wholly aligned decision - and not an
imposition of one over another. Unified purpose is 'healing' for it
releases the inflammatory cycle.
I am certain that the willing or
conscious leveraging of fear, for the purpose of gaining or
consolidating control, has brought up or exposed the nature OF fear and
control.
This means I stand back from engaging in polarised
'certainties' or identities, and look at what is being revealed - which
in my case is of course my life, experience and discernment. I use
discernment because I hold it to mean the direct self-honesty of the
heart as distinct from logical extensions of cherished identity.
I
think I read you rightly as one much more aligned with the 'official'
or government views than many others here who see a lot more than
doctored data. One of the confusing limits of our thought is the
presumption we see and share the same world or 'reality' outside us. But
everyone is living the life their particular background and personality
brings them and perceives according to underlying definitions and
beliefs that govern perceptions - which are always selective - and yet
are themselves generally invisible.
Part of what I see going on
is a splitting of 'reality' (as lived) between those who fear this virus
as propagated by media and politicians, and those who cannot understand
why others would choose to do so - for while there are some new
symptoms, they are preventable and treatable and generally only severe
as an 'old person's friend' - that is a way to finally leave a life
that is come to term. I don't suggest that meeting our death at any age
is pleasant or comfortable, but that the body is a temporary vehicle
that no one would really want to be locked down into forever. (At least
not without profound regenerative capacities of body, mind and spirit).
Mortal
fear is something the mind seeks to mask over ASAP by the quickest
means to hand. But to the certainty of love, the focus is given to
relationship, and not to taking thought for our self.
Yet we can lose such awareness to self-doubt in division and struggle - into which others and world then play into.
Insofar
as I received and pondered your response to me, I accept that we can
hide as much in reaction to perceived evils as is hidden in those who
blindly enact such evils. And I say blindly in terms of the heart of
honest recognition. But the process of addressing ills can learn as it
goes, so as to effectively calm and de-fuse the situation back to a
capacity for communication, from which steps can be taken as some
measure of agreement and practical resolution.
Without challenge, the
mind that does evil masks in virtues that lock them into its frame and
distance or dissociates them from virtues unmasked. So as to persist in
the sacrifice of the living to hollow fantasies given priority and
defence.
#5
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-189351
As
a tool unfit for the purpose it is being used for, and primed to
definitions that owe more to computer modelling than empirical science,
it is perfected fitted for the purpose of leveraging our mind from an
empirical honesty and curiosity, into a computer modelled 'global
system'.
I only added this after coming back in a commenting thread and looking for what 'conclusions' JDP might see in your response.
The
Exercise Myth by Dr Henry Solomon - is doubtless anathema to modern
thinking but also has the recognisable pattern of belief's, biases,
marketing, reputations and studies that don't fit the narrative and so
they are ignored.
Anything used as a panacea will be
applied and sought as answer for issues that are not really addressed
'there', and so the panacea will become the new framework for the
(impossible) resolution of conflicts that don't belong there, but which
everyone learns to 'see' by the belief they must be 'there'. If just
because most everyone else seems to 'see' or react to as real.
This
wishful thinking and invested identity, corrupts the patient and the
therapist both in a mutual clique of 'patient-demand support' and a
'therapy funding support'. And becomes the capacity to reverse roles -
as we are now experiencing. The therapy industry is demanding insane
support like a cancer in the body politic. Not least through the
capturing of regulators by which to redefine humanity as 'latent
infectious threat' to 'others' and thus forfeit of any individual rights
- to the trial and testing for treatments by which to maintain social
credit status
Judgement makes rules by which to actively filter
out the denied, and lock in the captive revenue stream. The notion of a
just accounting, is the idea of lawful and true witness as the basis for
a valid and life supported judgement.
#6
http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-189810
This
is indeed one claim among many that I count under malnutrition -
regardless the look or the calories of food. IE: There are critical
deficiencies across the spectrum of sustenance.
The other side of the same coin are toxins or imbalances to that effect.
The
interplay of the living body in sustaining the conditions for life go
perhaps infinitely beyond our modelling of it. So it doesn't follow that
calcium supplements or more dairy will help bones. Or that taking in
substances means that the body takes them up in the way we wanted.
The
genetic field wanted to discover the secret of life along with patents
and applications. Oh - and still does! - but epigenetic opens a closed
code system to a living response. And along with all of this is the
uncovering of the 'gut biome' - which includes what we call viral
expression - that operates the life support for our digestion, immune
functions and cognitive faculties - and which also operates a genetic
information exchange at frequency rates that make a fruit fly seem to
live to a venerable old age.
So while I also see nutrition as key
to life beyond a mere survival, I see that we humans have reacted to our
life and responded to our environment and each other in unique ways -
resulting from our mind-modelling of reality as part of conscious choice
or decision.
We can get in our own way - and then blame everyone and everything else.
I
hold the body as being self-healing and adaptive - and some of our
adaptations are mental or cultural, but supported by a largely invisible
realm of biota operating symbiotically within the conditions of change
and challenge. Biota that are in subtle but direct communication with
the total environment - and not just the field of perception extended
with instruments and aligned to models that can be wrong.
#7
I would love to see biological human studies proving infection rather than tracing epidemiological tracks.
Not the possibility of believed infection but the kind of tests carried out in the USA in 1918.
That failed to infect any healthy volunteers with matters and proximity from the very sick.
I
also note that this virus cant be cultured in human cells, but if you
take some and starve and poison them, adding the covid-19 culture (?)
shows marked degradation of the cells - ie 'call it infection'.
(I expect that current human thinking is misguided, and self-serving a limiting sense of self and life).
I read recently that for vax testing purposes a company needed volunteers to be infected with covid-19.
What they did not say was how that would be effected.
I very strongly suspect it would be injected.
Does anyone know?
Sperm
cells can be said to hijack an egg to replicate, but while some people
get pregnant at the drop of a hat or trousers or whatever, many don't
seem to be susceptible. Males are immune - but generally highly
infectious...
We of course know that pregnancy - for all its
challenging symptoms and experience - is a procreative and positive
process in support of life - even if not everyone survives it. I think
we could know that a disease process can also be seen as a health
condition in need of conditions of support. But everything comes down to
assertive fear and control vs relational acceptance and responsibility
at the level of trusting our being. My sense of 'spiritual' has nothing
to do with 'added identity beliefs' but transparency of mind to our
being or indeed the heart of honesty.
#8
I
choose to differ. And say that the corruption of our science by
corporate-gov invested technologism, denies us our true significance,
and masks over with banal and absurd teletubby cosmology. Science is
being coerced FROM empirical research and incentivised into mathematical
computer modelling.
The problems I see in medicine are also in Cosmology.
Our
true significance is NOT a nothingness of self-lack seeking to mask
over in diversionary stories. Mainstreamed science is no less
'politicised' and 'settled'. Climatology is now vastly funded within the
remit of AGW and specifically in the frame of CO2 driven GW or CC.
To the same end goal as the covid mind reset.
The
megalomania of arrogance and ignorance properly belongs to those who
having the means, are set in the goals of remaking Humanity in their own
image.
The politicians are crisis actors and their handlers are
never far away as trained operatives in perception management. Armies of
legal clerks draft vast swathes of regulation, that are leveraged in
via accompanying PR or using diversionary tricks - when no one is
looking.
The narratives are selected. funded and propagated via many
fronted activism that can seem to be a social movement. They are not
about making sense, but targeted to our profile as effective strategies
to engage emotional reactions (or any kind) while insiders ensure that
guidances become regulatory and effectively conditions for doing
business - right down to local level in nurseries, libraries, tradesmen,
shopkeepers - everyone.
Pride comes before a fall, and self-inflation becomes invested in the spin of its own 'new robes'.
We
see it much more readily in others - and yet we all learn to think in
the reactive conditionings of our own survival - or self-protective
identity - against being exposed as without validity, substance or
legitimacy - and so we have the same 'disease' as the 'Emperor'.
BTW
the intuition of Eternity as a truth beneath or outside time, restores a
sense of underlying truth within even heavily denied and alloyed fears
(or conflict within our own mind). Whereas the idea of death as turning
off the tv, serves the idea of sacrificing everything for a sense of
power set in control over life - which is fantasy given priority over
truth - once called sin. By getting rid of God, we can sin without
guilt. because without living truth all illusions are equal - and some
are more equal than others to those who think nothing of sacrificing the
lives and good of all to their own private agenda. In fact they cannot
recognise the living God of all, for addiction to such agenda demands
sacrifice of the truth of the heart of real relationships to follow the
false profits set in false premises.
I don't teach hell nor
invoke evil to leverage agreement or attention, for hell and evil are
derivatives, resulting from identity in sin, set against feared and
hated truth. When the fear and hate are being unmasked we are exposed or
suffer hell. The terror I met in local shopping trips back in
Springtime was visceral, palpable and shocking to meet. The hate
operated the masking defence and distancing as a claim to mask in
virtue. This is reversing the Natural Order in the minds of the fearful.
I prefer resurrect, redeem or restore, to 'reset'. The belief we are a
computer underlies all of the madness - not least the desire to open the
Gates and hack the code. Which reveals the knowledge that at some level
we are also the Programmer or Scriptwriter - but this is hidden from
the screen persona.
#9
You are not the average person and are acting from a recognition that you have to live with yourself - and this means educating yourself rather than perhaps sucking on fear-sickening propaganda as if it represents authority.
I am of one mind with my partner in life and yet part of our way of being is respect for another's freedom. So while it may be very challenging for both of you, this is a basis for extending trust and acceptance - if not agreement.
The capacity to fold or not even try to understand because its all outside your current sense of self and life may be unreadiness or active unwillingness to grow, learn or step up to meet your lives where they are. Fear of failure or loss of face can abort the movement of being and sharing in, who we are.
If you so chose, this could all be very unifying - from a rededication to life, to each other, your world and your self.
The primary deceit going on is the way everything is being framed or misrepresented.
An intelligent man or woman would not accept such treatment, and so intelligence has to play second fiddle to fitting in rather than see it for what it is. Intelligence can be applied to masking off what we don't want to meet in others or ourselves.
#10
You make a point I can more easily join with.
Iatrogenic disease is the third leading cause of death officially in US and UK - and perhaps other developed countries. If I included death by chemo and radiation, it may top the charts.
For all that there are some who die for lack or fear of treatment, there are others saved thereby.
The core issue I see is responsibility for our own beliefs - that are revealed as beliefs by disillusion.
There must be many who see their 'healthcare service' as either denied them, dangerous to engage with, and morphing into a PPP that feeds the public to the private sector as a captured revenue stream or useful statistic.
This must either crush people or inspire them to re-educate as responsibility for health at a much more fundamental level than they knew existed until the floor disappeared.
I see the belief in crushing denial as something we can choose NOT to use to boost or bolster beliefs that do not stand in truth, and live the opening of perspectives that break the fear and isolation to share in life as practical of helpful steps, as the re-cognition of a love that was discarded, masked over, and lost or broken.
Without love we are nothing. I can use other qualities of Living - for the nature of 'living' is always beyond the words and cannot be patented or copyrighted. To those who mask in the form or wish of love, love's honesty will seen stark, brutal and terrible - hence the urge to protect the mask. Dis-illusion must mean unmasking or revealing. The mind is ingenious in replacing one illusion with another - without any fundamental change. Conflict is inherent to invested illusion set against simple truth, and the persistence in such 'self and world' is the attempt to protect and mask it over by diversionary delay, so as to buy more time against the addressing of an underlying defended misidentification.
It is apparent in our world that an error that could have been simply corrected in its moment can become a terrible burden of guilt by concealment in denials and lies.
The attempt to further deny and protect a system of conflict control under masking parody of life, is running as if to control the 'reset'. The arrogance is built into the ignorance.
#11
Mr Chris:
I get all of that. What I don’t get is the current panic, new semi lockdowns etc.
Are they justified?
If maintaining a global control system across a spectrum of social, economic and legal frameworks is paramount, then clearly yes, or it would not be promoted, supported and executed by such interests. Ivor Cummings is very clear and has the capacity to remain calm under duress ... so far. The condition in play is emotional psychological and therefore social-political. In my view the lie is so big that most minds fold to unreason rather than see it for what it is.
IE- "They would never do that!". Billionaire's 'wealth' increased by almost 30% during this facade.
Insiders run scams that periodically are 'Crashed' as a consolidation of possession and control. (in the context of becoming such a 'house of cards' as to become uncontrollable).
War and sickness are therefore a means to an end for those who ARE the networks of influence.
WHO decides what or who is a viable business or person? No, WHO is used in concert with other fronts that represent global financial (and other) controls.
I don't not include the crisis actors groomed to influence us - such as buffoons and muppets barking their master's voice. People here think they have the capacity to read something sane and recognise sense, so as to steer us out of madness (they delivered us into).
Collateral damage or side effects are relative to the targeted priority.
"Well Doc, we lost the patient, but we got the cancer".
If you play that side of the mind, you HAVE to believe the war on cancer (insert whatever) is THE overriding priority and therefore source of virtue or moral necessity. Nothing and no one can be allowed to 'attack' such a 'mind set against its own evils' projected to the scapegoat, terrorist, or virus of the day.
I felt Tom Cowan's latest interview with 'C A Fitts' spoke into the bigger picture - but immediately after I watched it, Youtube pulled it. I found it then on Odysee - where you can also download a copy. But the capacity to look on corruption and recognise it - is also to become aware of our part in it from a willingness to release it.
(She called that the red button moment). I don't give ultimate reality to the changing world and so I have perspectives that are not 'in the world' on the way our minds, culture and development unfold experience. I always seek to bring this into the way we see and relate to our world, each other and our being. Madness feeds itself until starved of support and replaced by Sanity. But the mad believe they are sane. It is a reversal that many here are unable NOT to see, though it is a disturbing experience to see otherwise ordinary people like us in total dissociation. Fear does that to the mind that buys into it.
#12
http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/10/26/how-dangerous-is-covid19/#comment-190829
I was writing to the feasibility of zinc being a factor in covid associated hypoxia to one who thought it illogical. (And then to JDP who somehow thought I was advocating mandatory euthanasia).
(Note these two comments are in the thread linked above but not on this page).
But in terms of politics by deceit, from the very outset I saw the Orwellian doublespeak and recognised a masked attack on civilisation such as we have/had, and a targeting of the vulnerable under cover of using them as leverage. The medical masking - like any masking - doesn't truly invalidate the virtue or truth of what is being masked in or as - but our social acceptance of fraud does undermine, devalue and corrupt trust in science, reason and life, so as to feed a false view of health, body and life, as sickness and weakness. It is the mask that is sick and weak and always in need of boosting, funding, and regular sacrificial rites. In this sense I am using 'mask' for a corrupted or mistaken model. If you step outside the mask, you may be socially debited or excluded.
'Questions that cannot be asked' - (or criticisms that cannot be made) - provide cover (masking protection) for loveless, or hateful and coercive agenda. Fear of exposure of such agenda then armours the mask further. It's a death spiral masking as 'control' perceived as conspiracy to run masked or evasive agenda. Perhaps this is the natural course of a dying civilisation looked at in the large. However I also associate death with ripening to seed or harvest and an apparent death to pupation is not what it seems. While I am alive and have consciousness, I have and live perspective. The mind is 'locked down' by its own predicated self-definitions. As if a masking persona of wishful thinking can become stuck on, physically inescapable and locked in deadly fears as our human conditioning - not least by masking in distraction and diversion as a way to buy time for self-illusion set against reconciliation with truth.