Life is what we each and all are choosing to make of it - now and now

in reply to

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/08/22/what-causes-heart-disease-part-64-not-changing-your-mind/?replytocom=144735#respond

Life is what we each and all are choosing to make of it - now and now -  regardless our circumstances.

The intent to empower victimhood rather than serve the awareness of the capacity to make choices with regard to improving perspectives and conditions, is to effect sympathy as a mask for manipulative agenda. Instead of asking for or extending love.

Compassion is the capacity to be with what is present, as an active willingness to join in strength and support in any opportunity of shared willingness.

False sympathy seeks escape from what it cannot abide by framing in emotional appeals that seem to join but actually separate as a sense of control, distance and manipulation.

This facet of our human conditioning is perhaps the most in need of honest awareness, because the learned habit of sacrificing honesty to a form of 'correctness; is exactly the vector of our being delivered into deceits - such as work backwards.

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health,  Lawyers destroy justice,  Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom,  Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". Michael Ellner

Manipulative opportunism makes its home in our fears. A recognition of separation trauma is the timely opportunity of its revisiting and release. But the use of grief and grievance to re-enact separation trauma as if to get even, is its recycling in ever depleting cycles - that is then used as justification for ever tighter controls and ever greater sacrifice of freedom.

The recent poster to the magic bullet idea is simply to the idea of magical solution which is wishful thinking given power as avoidance of the unthinkable. This can be any form of treatment - and the orthodox may simply represent the current socially invested belief - with its failures chalked up to the 'power of the disease' and thus the call to persist the official treatment - else the evil will ravage unchecked because any other belief or approach is the 'quack' to the billion dollar invested corporate authority. Especially if it not only works, but undermines the belief in the 'incurable' as a cause to keep pumping billions of dollars into - along with traumatised people pushed to 'act now or else!

The magic, or manipulation of appearances, is already in the 'model' and the diagnosis that proceeds from it. If a wrong turn is taken - everything else can then extend the error no matter how honourable their intent or how intense the devotion to its cause.

Our current science stands on the shoulders of giant mistakes that have been capitalised by corporate manipulative intent under which the many believe to be their guide and protector.

One cannot build anything stable on wishfully manipulative foundations. Mistaken investments call to be written off and released for freedom to be restored to legitimate creative endeavour. Imagination has a vital role in the science of our appreciation and relation to our world - within an  integrative expression or solution. Not the conforming and complying of life to a tyranny of fear and grievance.

Mind-as-defence is more than able to manifest diversion to what is a deeper fear

in reply to

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/07/29/a-second-look-at-vaccination-answers-that-cannot-be-questioned/?replytocom=144755#respond 

Very good points to what otherwise could run as 'accepted currency'. Misinfo and disinfo is only a matter of intentions. The last point raises my point that the mind-as-defence is more than able to manifest diversion to what is a deeper fear, and lock into the diversion even if it is a disease condition. I write because I have an appreciation of the psych-physical nature of our existence and yet also see that 'cause' can be inducted as say guilt regarding parents unhappiness, so as to 'take on' what does not belong to them, and suffer the conflict of it as if an inner failing, or project what IS theirs but what they want to get rid of, hide in or hide from which of course will always come home regardless the technology applied to 'whack-a-mole!'.

So perhaps a stinging criticism, taken to heart, can be displaced to the 'appearance' and even hold the meaning "Look on what you have done to me!" as a diversion of a vicious self-hatred.

Speaking of emotional expression can seem irrational because at a rational level we learn to mask over and control such feeling-reaction - and are considered to have 'lost control, be shamed' and deemed socially incapable in transparency or naked 'vulnerability'.

How much of our rationalising justifications or explanations are in effect a form of psychic-emotional armouring? Social or peer investment in the defence is a large part of its service as defence and this applies also to the idea of vaccines as a small ongoing sacrifice to fear by which to hope to escape a much greater pain of loss. But even this basis is become absurd to the expansion and mandate of a global state vaccine subjection as a sort of compulsory religion to which reason itself must be sacrificed. But then that may be to arrive at our starting place and recognise that giving power to fear, and then seeking a counter power to offset or hide it, is to make psychic emotional 'antibodies' or negatively triggering associations as a mindset against reliving a fear and so also against revising or revisioning our mind and model or interpretation of own self and world. This is the resistance to change that mere appeal to reasoned argument cannot reach, because we cannot see in others, what we are not accepting of or open to in ourself. And so we only 'see' through the lens of our own currency of acceptance or indeed not really see as a result of judgemental withholding of rights and worth.

Whoever has the most freedom of awareness is in the position to extend a true communication which - whatever its content - is addressed to another's worth and not at or about them in ways that 'un-person' or smear, attack or deny - which to my view is a dump of our own conflict onto others - within negative associations that wall out, deny voice and set us into a subjection to suffering our 'stuff' as if the power of others to deny us - because our 'defences' put it there - where it cannot BE resolved. At some point it may become obvious that we suffer our defences and lock into them, rather than suffer (live) the original conflict as our need and active call to find true resolution, reintegration, reconciliation or healing.

The idea of beliefs or ideas running as if having a life of their own

in reply to

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/08/22/what-causes-heart-disease-part-64-not-changing-your-mind/#comment-144645

Who indeed was 'Shakes spear' (Pallas Athena). I lean to Francis Bacon as the likely artist - though not to say there may not have been understudies working under or with him. 'Pulling the wool over our eyes' has been attributed to the passing off of 'William Shakespeare' for the forming of a British Identity, in language and so in cultural expression. The ideas are a resurgence of largely Greek perspective of drama as the 'divine archetypes' of its playing out in human tragi-comedy. Art reflecting Life?
Regardless any bias of its times or who penned it, I see the work as standing in its own right as a mirror held up to the human condition. Not so much the intent to run a business model on knowingly false assertions - that are passed off as true to those who have been induced or chosen to give authority away. This will shift to hide in new forms as the nature of a mind in denial and evasion of its true Authoring or Nature. I suspect the demonised will be recognised as health supporting when we stop casting out fears, so as to then attack them in 'role' and thus 'prove them true' by the generation of further disease or conditions of scarcity and lack.

The idea of beliefs or ideas running as if having a life of their own, is part of the nature of 'narrative reality' or social engineering - because narrative identities are not based upon truth so much as the 'world we grew up in' and inherit and acquire by adaptation.

Once an idea of set of ideas can be propagated to 'take' root in the minds of many, those minds automatically protect them, by seeking and finding justifications, reinforcements as defence for their own existence.

This is in any case part of the nature of a narrative identity of personality structure as story of self, family, and world.

To what degree do we each and collectively 'make our reality' as our interpretive construct - through which we then experience the only Reality that is?

We may say we 'make sense of it' - but to whom? To the heart and mind of a conscious self acceptance? Or to a conforming and complying adaptation to the demands of a learned survival?

The definitions and beliefs we accept for ourself extend to our relations and world, and the experiencing of that relationship then reflects as a world to which we adapt or are conditioned by.

What do we actually believe, why do we believe it and what do we get out of it? These are fundamental curiosities that will only arise from the willingness to question our reality experience or narrative identity because it is dissonant to who and what we are and we are no longer willing to deny or sacrifice our sense of our own existence or being to a dissonant model or set of ideas.

In terms of 'causes' of disease, we are in the realm of magic and superstition as long as we are identifying first cause OUT THERE. A chain of logical effects does proceed from giving cause away, and this chain can be meticulously studied as if to prove itself - but only within the initial presumption or assignation - ie Heart function fails and cholesterol is the bad guy. And therefore in the avoidance, denial or manipulative distortion of unsupporting or conflicting evidences.

Why believe it? what do we get out of believing it? To the layman, the belief may be in the higher knowledge of the trained specialist, and the application of that knowledge as technological interventions. But specialisation becomes myopic without a unifying context such as to become tooled by our own tools and controlled or trapped in our own thinking.

Definition comes first and in medical terms; diagnosis as the basis for treatment is the discernment or interpretation of the presentation by which to respond. Likewise in medical terms, the diagnosis is an 'expert' categorisation of symptoms assigned to specified disease definitions in which the believed mechanism is seen as the cause and mechanical interventions applied to block or suppress its expression.

Magic and superstition are a freedom of the mind to make its own connections and associations and learn from them -  or it would not be a mind but a mechanism. Insofar as we can make ourself in our own image, we can substitute for awareness of fulfilment of function, and generate a breakdown of capacity to support or maintain the model, the body, the social structure. And call it progress, profit or sustainability.

Fear as self fulfilling prophecy

in reply to 

http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/08/22/what-causes-heart-disease-part-64-not-changing-your-mind/#comment-144645

I have uncovered the same overview and urge a deeper appreciation of the significance of  'fear as self-fulfilling prophecy'.

The sense of deep betrayal, of hideous mistake or grievous outcome arising from honest enquiry in this and other issues of trust in protection - are all in and of themselves potential nodes for the persistence of negatively looping experience.

In essence the possession of a sense of control is the power by which to escape or mitigate fear - without attending or undoing its cause.

Fear will be associated with and attach itself to conditions, that are then seen as causal.

But the nature of fear as a self-feeding structure of belief running beneath our surface awareness, is of conflicted purpose or desire.

The body is a miraculous event of unified purpose - in terms of an ever more revealed complexity of collaboration of cells, bacterial life, and organ function - all at once - in real time - as the support for life that we take as our own where in fact we are of it and have it by sharing or living its relational expression.

Aligning in health by manual override of body function is the belief something has gone wrong exported to the body or world and addressed their by interventions that not only do not address the cause, but introduce new vectors of expression for the un-address cause. In mythic terms, three new heads grow for every head chopped off. Feeding the problem under guise of resolving it can then demand ever more funding and sacrifice to maintain the 'power' set up against the feared threats, enemies, adversities, such as to operate not unlike a tumour in its encapsulation and containment of the issue as a split off or rogue and malevolent intent - outside and set apart and against the will of the attempt to eradicate it.

'Too big to fail' can also mean too embedded in systemic foundations for social order. Our social order is structured upon and reinforcing of core beliefs that are not true - but their story is held as truth by all who are invested in it as a sense of power and protection from unowned and masked or hidden fear.

No one can force another to become willing to see or know what they are unwilling or even unready at this timing to look at. The attempt to 'control' outcomes as if the outcome is the disease is a thought reversal that corrupts even the best of intentions because it frames life falsely.

The rising insanity of a world in which 'Everything is backwards!' is thus a deconstructing or disintegration of our framing beliefs and the institutional structures of their expression. In any case fear is like a genie out of its bottle and the control structure of elitism (power set over rather than representative trust) seeks to keep the lid on while appealing for sustainability as the call to a much tighter and granular human control system - because the idea of 'malevolent virus' has become an active identification of human beings - us. When the very idea of 'contagion' is at root; the transmission and induction of fear.

Thinking from fear is driven, compulsive and tyrannical even as it is compartmentalised and dissociative from the love that characterises any real relational communication. The alignment in healing is for both the therapist and the client - else a sick model persists in missing the true need of the client's current expression in its imposing of a model of 'treatment' for correcting or managing the condition. While the client uses the therapist to get rid of what they see as a violator of their life or malevolent expression of threat to their life. Where these conflicting purposes SEEM to coincide is a mutually reinforcing illusion. A negative feedback loop running as healthcare system.

It is recognised that for many, coming off of such a mis-diagnosed and mis-taken 'support system', needs its own process of weaning to a more integrative responsibility - depending on the degree of dependency on adaptations to a mistaken model or derivative identity.

Immune support is even more needed in those who have lost natural immunity, as well as a world in which immune function at cellular level is being systematically destroyed. Fear-defined and driven human thinking works the propagation of the 'viral' threat not human being. Nor any segregated groups of beings demonised for thinking at variance to an unquestionably applied model. Not least because independent transparency and accountability would reveal it to be unfounded or baseless - and no more than a grab or a clinging to possession of power set in fear of loss of control. Here is a messenger we would be wise to heed.

Killing the Messenger is the refusal to look or listen to an expansion of perspective, relative to a personal sense of invested identity that fears transformational change as it fears death in life and so frames life in fear and suffers the burden of pervasive and persistent strain and isolation.

Mind over matter is obvious in the realm of our body - and yet is it 'control over' or is there a support of reinforcement experience to the intent and desire being given priority - regardless whether running consciously to our noticing. The walling out of 'perceived threat' is a kind of attempted immunity but the perception is not a fact but an interpretation. All response proceeds from an interpreter. The cult of experts is not a culture of true mastery. Mastery is the development of a balanced awareness of all that pertains to a situation as the movement of its fruitful expression. 'not knowing' is therefore the call to pause and be open to the movement and recognition of that which does - because life is not blind mechanism so much as an energetic relational expression. The attempt to present expertise as knowledge-control and legal application is itself a blind mechanism given allegiance and support by the willingness to subjugate or sacrifice our relational awareness to a politically manipulated social 'correctness'.