Novel Narratives

 

#1

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125670 

But IF there had been no 'discovery of novel virus' and media driven focus in hysteria, and we had simply looked at the respiratory complications of sickness and death as a group of scientists would we have discovered any different?

So is the term 'covid death' a scientific term or a media narrative meme?

Would we talk about cold deaths? There are such - and in end of life or immune suppressed, a cold can provide the pathway from this world.

Not many note the breakup of the UK, nor the replacement of the NHS by a CHS. The old names may be retained but the public is being fed to a private 'partnership' that is corporate capture running under PR.

Why capitalise covid?

The narrative interpretation of events can be a fiction while of course something has happened or is happening. Once invested by reaction it is hard to 'see' any other way. The manipulator knows this and uses all emotional leverage to induce the initial reaction by which to seal the deal.

A pandemic of obesity gives lip service to a virological term for a systemic result of toxic food supply to mis-educacted people whose gut has been undermined - and with it cognition, digestion and immune function.

It is industrially designed disease. Not that corpulence is new, but that used to be for the few who could afford over indulgences that got the better of them.

IE: The condition had a very different clinical profile.

Malthus wanted to site the poor in areas of marsh and swamp that were associated with sickness - so as to retard their capacity to breed. That mindset is discredited on surface but only grew in influence to work from the shadows. What else would biosecurity entail but the control of biology?

#2

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125679

Sweden confessed to some lockdown deaths – but otherwise hasn’t as yet trashed its economical life support system.

The result of doing this to ourselves is more than a passing seasonal death toll that is almost identical to average seasonal death tolls in number and demographics.

The capacity of the ‘covid’ mind capture to operate as The Narrative to which all else is subordinate used to be called a ‘god’.

#3

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125659

Insanity piles upon insanity until the Call to Sanity moves within the disturbance that the mind can no longer mask in rationalisations.

Gentle is the spirit that calms the mind of its inflammation to reveal the heart’s knowing. A true resonance does hold a sweet spot of recognition, but in the time of the Mad Emperor, everyone is masked in imaginary minds.

#4

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125692

Twists in the plot that suggest yet another rabbit hole keep the attention in the ruse.

The conceit operates ingeniously.

You can go back by the way to a mine in China a decade or so earlier. See Swiss Doctor site

https://swprs.org/covid-19-virus-origin-the-mojiang-miners-passage-hypothesis/

Novel toxic environments provide novel viral response to weave into novel ways to manipulate the human biological response as novel opportunity to profit thereby.

So regardless the hulabaloo I don’t buy the virological basis for disease – even thought I recognise it is an established religion. However, I can still see toxicity and distress operating in the environmental exposures as well as in the treatments and prophylactics.

The difference between infection and injection is that the first has to make it through the protective membranes, find a receptive condition and be taken in and multiplied. The second gets in via the mind of the target as permission to bypass all checks and boundary conditions, to take over the function of the body politic.

This is what we have. A high ‘security’ prison that makes us ‘safe’ while robbing us of all this is ours – in our name. This might be a re-run of the prodigal son story in which we are robbed of a living inheritance by die hard, wasteful, extravagant, spendthrift, improvident, imprudent, immoderate, profligate, thriftless, excessive, intemperate, irresponsible, self-indulgent, reckless, and wanton habits – given permission to run their course.

#5

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125132

No proof of causation of a specific disease has been established for the novel virus. This statement can be extended but start there.

Causation is assumed, believed and fitted to as dogma.

Parallel: the accusation and assignment to cholesterol and saturated fats of causing heart disease was 'The Science' that had been effectively bought and run for 30-40 years before lack of evidential support correlated with the PR campaigns that operated corporate and government interests in setting such a narrative - and consequent food control system (Big Ag based on oil and chemicals).

An underlying pattern can be observed in the demonising of the naturally evolved adaptation, for novel forms of capture, control and defence against disclosure. These are presented as progress or new and improved, necessary or moral protections against our demonisation for their toxic results.

The biosecurity state is a replacement of human love and life (for all our faults), with a built in guilted control system - whether as carbon units, infection vectors or narrative-critical awareness (non compliance under Thought control).

Is this the end of the human experience to the beginning of the human experiment? In some ways it has always been both - at least since the mind of 'As If' were invested with priority over 'As Is'.

The reiteration of trauma shock as reset for control

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131/#comment-125022 

I had often had the thought that if I had just appeared within the human experience, I would wonder what great shock had occurred that everyone was so psychically locked down and normalised to masking over and masking in as their social model of conditions, perceptions and responses. (Precovid).

The breaking of the normal by a reiteration or re-invoking of such shock or 'separation trauma' is the resetting of the god idea as 'control' or lording it over - rather than the idea of life as One, and its expressions as of a kind each according to their kind.

You may not be able to read that because the masking of a mind is itself a defence against disclosure to fears that are as a result unnameable - for the mind operates the naming of asserted meanings rather than an awareness of discerned qualities.

But the fear-mind effectively covers over and usurps a direct relational awareness (or being) by modelling its reality as a gesture of control, and identifies in control in fear of loss of self.

And so the recognition of the model or imagination or possible way of seeing, for what it is rather than using it for what it does, is the bringing of the mind of thought, perception, and emotional response to a willing presence of awareness, where they are revealed, released, undone or repurposed to serve a relational whole, rather than a gesture of recoil to the fear of losing control as a result of investing in the image, form and model of reality - (mind) as our self.

The re-cognition from Self-Awareness is enlightenment, and yet the attempt to marketise or weaponise this is the Promethean error of stealing the light rather than being transformed and repurposed within the light. The mind habit seeks to interject control - which is the attempt to put new wine in old paradigms.

As such it is ingenious in its capacity to mask in virtue and believe its own spin.

The virtues of truth recognised and extended are alive and are known and shared in life as qualities of resonant communication and experience.

To run a model or set of assertions, presumptions and agreements that has no basis in what it claims to proceed from or speak for is to dissociate from reality. While this seems to feed or fulfil a sense of self-imagined gain or profit, it serves a self-inflation, but being fundamentally untrue, means its boom is assured to bust - and pride thus comes before a fall.

Uncovering a true Ground Zero - from which all else proceeds has been misperceived by many as a result of destruction - as if the old must be deconstructed and destroyed before a new order can be built upon it. This is entirely in error - or the 'zero' in truth is the Unity Point from which all polarities arise as a whole constellation. Nothing exists in and of itself. Even as we do unto the least we do unto our Self.

Polarised or split identity perceives or interprets the zero point from its own fractured presumption of lack, loss, denial, deprivation, rejection, abandonment, betrayal into terms of such a mind-framing. The zero is thus the point of Infinite potential assigned destructive or negative expression IN the mind of acceptance and alignment in negative or segregative conflict. That this induces a recoil from Infinity is hardly surprising because regardless the mind, our being rests in truth.

There is more to Finity than meets the eye of the mind that set limits on Everything.

Life in the body is inherently set in a realm of flux and change that is temporal. Re-Cognising the Ground of our being is a perspective that is more apt to recognise as life through the body, rather than locked down and masked IN it. This is a profound transition of identification that is inherently exposing to latent fears, and yet opening to qualities of a greater embrace that are compassion itself.

Identification in self-illusion will hold all of the compelling dramatic emotional framing of its casting out. In this sense we each have a personality structure and strategy of survival and adaptation to a broken human constellation - that if seen as a whole would reveal a net of entangled fear, set in grievance and denial against reconciliation and release.

How dear to us are our grievances?

How willing are we to protect pain and pass it on to our children?

How willing to disown such a burden from our family, culture and world, so as to accept our own alignment in truth of being?

Owning that and what we feel as our own experience, opens steps of willingness where there is willingness to move and be moved. Our responsibility is our own alignment to the Field of our being. We are truly moved by and in a process of self-revelation - which is the revers and the undoing of a training in control set in self-assertions, judgements and denials.

The freedom to persist in the old normal of a lockdown in 'control', is the willingness to bear the fruits of an increasing awareness of self-betrayal. Pain has a limit.

Government Consultation on Covid vaccine

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/uk-law-changes-for-covid-19-mass-vaccination/

After reading the above page I filled in the form at

https://consultations.dhsc.gov.uk/5f43b8aca0980b6fc0198f9f

I checked all the areas of concern and then made the following comments:

Temporary authorisation of the supply of unlicensed products:

As there is no credible basis for panic response, all authority should be reserved for fully licensed product and practices, fully evaluated and shown to be safe and effective.

Civil liability and immunity:

The  waiving of liability for being held accountable for actions is the removal of a significant public protection both in standards of testing and development and of redress for negligence of fraud. The record of the pharmaceutical companies regarding fraud has many many billion dollar charges found against them. They are in business for profit and PR as well as wielding huge influence across political media and other institutional influence. The public needs protection from abuse of power.

Expansion to the workforce eligible to administer vaccinations:

The basis for this is the presumption of mass vaccinations - under either coercive or high levels of disincentive. I see no need to expand the workforce for the provision of vaccines to those who freely choose to have one. The overall death statistic and disease profile is in the region of 99.8% are not significantly threatened by Sar-Cov-2. The call 

for vaccination as necessary, is ignoring and overriding the science.

Vaccine promotion:

Vaccines should not be promoted as safe and effective unless proven to be so. The promotion of any health measure must always be in the realm of transparency and accountability. Currently neither apply. Merely stating assertions from a place or disproportionate influence does not make them true, but can make legitimate questioning or reporting impossible, and thus a lack of information from which to make an informed choice. Vaccines should not be 'special' or exempted from the due process or accountability in science and under law.

Provisions for wholesale dealing of vaccines:

Regulatory process needs to be in the public interest and not in the pharmaceutical companies claim to the public interest. The revolving door of corporate and government effectively means we have a corporate government. I call for a reinstatement of true Governance, and the rule of Law - that even pharmaceutical companies and the other bio-tech 

sector must operate in - or else we become a laboratory experiment for predation by corporate interests without human right, voice of freedoms.

#2

Commented to

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/news-alerts-week-37-2020/

If there was more than a token masking in 'care or protection' we would be educated and supported in joining to uncover solutions.

The recognition of a blind totalitarian or monopolistic power grab behind what we took to be healthcare, government, media reporting and education is based on lies feeding upon wishful self-illusion.

The intent to induce dependency as the basis for control uses fear working on a sense of self-lack.

Self-lack is a sense of inadequacy to meet the moment or be equal to it - and so it seeks to hide a loss of wholeness in masking narratives set over conflict - as if to have escaped it.

Immunity is functional wholeness - and resilience is the capacity to live through stress or indeed distress and heal or release the conditions of imbalance of toxicity that temporarily pertain. Life support is part of the will to live - but the will of a whole desire is not the same as the willing subjugation to a mind of fear and control.

Awakening responsibility for connection and support in life is served by the release of a false idol - once we move past a sense of betrayal.

Whatever else happens, the willingness for a re-education in life that embraces the whole of who we are is open because we are alive now.

Reacting to what is not here now from a projected sense of expectations and modelling of trends is a way to lose our Now by reacting to what is not current.

There is so much in the recognition of a world gone wrong that can feed a negative imagination, that then dispossesses us of recognition, reason and relational response, that a context for our re-education needs to be simple joy in being. However we open or allow that, and in whatever way that works for us, as part of our day, it offers wordlessly a place of wholeness or unconflicted being from which to prioritise and align our energy and attention.

I can only invite the consideration that our alignment in our being is an energetic context for whatever else we choose to do, eat, exercise, study, or engage in as an expression of living rather than fear of dying or simply fear or pain of loss - which can so easily run unnoticed beneath what then is a token attempt to align or restore the virtues of living to our functional expression of being not more nor less than ourselves. 

A Human Alliance

https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/11/latest-news-131

When J Corbyn stood out against the back drop of a cynical and corporately captured political class - he shone a quality of humanity that set most else off by contrast. It wasn't his ideas or policies so much as his sense of the privilege and duty of representation to ordinary people that wasn't just lip service, but willing to stand against considerable persecution of character by a mainstream lockstep in smear.

I was heartened to see human qualities openly demonstrated in a realm of studied and trained deceit and evasion that can of course be seen as the development of a survival instinct within the parameters of likewise developing conditions - not least of which are the shift of power away from any real political process to cartels of financial and corporate power that effectively owns or captures anything that would hold its power in check or to account - including for the most part, apparent opposition.

J Corbyn's revealed to many the nature of the mainstream media as 'fronts' for a single (not a common) purpose, and the nature of the resort to get rid of him in public political terms was itself somewhat revealing of the hidden powers that shape our 'narratives, set our regulatory strictures and contrive to condition the herd to lose any residual immunity to a mind-control that amazingly many still do not recognise to be operating.

But I started this post in the intent to say a human cross party and indeed neo party alliance (trans party cannot be used now) - is what I wanted to see. (Not a rebranded Labour party).

There are inhuman and antihuman elements to the development of our thought, technology and its social and economic application that are NOT progress or progressive, NOR conservative or conserving, but mask in any seeming virtue by any device so as to prevail over and undermine all else.

The subversion of a love of nature and vision for a more convivial world by funnelling (a primarily corporate-led) environmental guilt and toxicity into 'carbon guilt' that like covid - buys and bullies the 'science' to push a self-hating anti-human agenda that WANTS to see destruction of the human race - who are now commonly accepted to be a cancer or virus on the planet and must therefore sacrifice, be sacrificed and give their own up to a society of sacrifice to the god of guilt.

This is no different in principle to the global 'biosecurity' state set over humans as vectors of contagious infection. The underlying themes are guilt, hate and vengeance, operating through fear masked in fake virtue, clung to as the only 'protection' from terror that cannot be brought to light or articulated - and so it is flagged to enemies and threats and viruses and asteroids (cue for the aliens) - while our measures of control, defence or protection actually DO the damage and destruction to ourselves that no external enemy would be able to do.

What it is to be human does include the capacity to become captured or caught in our own thinking so as to be deceived in the following of a false profit under false premise, such as to effectively deliver ourselves unto evil. But only to the point of willingness to persist in the lie once we can no longer mask it as if true and believe it.

This is no different in principle to the global 'biosecurity' state set over humans as vectors of contagious infection. The underlying themes are guilt, hate and vengeance, operating through fear masked in fake virtue, clung to as the only 'protection' from terror that cannot be brought to light or articulated - and so it is flagged to enemies and threats and viruses and asteroids (cue for the aliens) - while our measures of control, defence or protection actually DO the damage and destruction to ourselves that no external enemy would be able to do.

What it is to be human does include the capacity to become captured or caught in our own thinking so as to be deceived in the following of a false profit under false premise, such as to effectively deliver ourselves unto evil. But only to the point of willingness to persist in the lie once we can no longer mask it as if true and believe it.

It may be that those who are most called or driven to manipulate others are providing an experiential education unwittingly for those willing to recognise and release their part in it rather than play victim over and over again. Which is the desire to regain and give expression to a core humanity that is of a practical love of willingness to accept and engage with what is - as it is - rather than mask in the forms or correctnesses of 'love' as if to claim the right to enforce what 'should be' from a private agenda seeking control by guile.

A Human Alliance does not set others as anti-human if it focuses on the ideas and issues instead of being baited and drawn into the mire of personal smearing, pejorative and polarising of identity that paralyses any truly conscious awareness for finding cultural expression - such that madness misrules by consent. For despite what we say we hate, we give consent at a level of energy, attention and reaction that most of us are masked off from and think to be our freedom - excepting it doesn't know more than a fleeting fantasy of some personal gratification within a sense of self and world that has only the freedoms granted by permission of set conditions.

I don't wholly accept the term 'alliance' because it suggests allying against. But the 'human family' is the underlying quality to be uncovered - even in conflict. However family is of a kind - even if a broken family constellation holds the trauma of great pain of unkindness. The pattern of broken love and life, sets us in conflict not just with each other but within ourselves. These two are of each other and both are expressing our relationship with our being.

Insanity is where loss of coherency with our being sets the call for Sanity as a recognisable and willing priority.

The trap was laid long before the spring was released

https://off-guardian.org/2020/09/08/covid-19-scamdemic-part-2/#comment-237118

The trap has been long laid before the spring was released.

All the previous iterations and drills that went before passed your notice.

But as Adam Curtis pointed out - when the power of dreams is no longer available as a carrot, then the only stick of leverage to the manipulative deceit is the power of nightmares, by which to maintain its supply of 'existence' from your willing allegiance.

The wishful selling of freedom for a dream of self-specialness or enhancement is the 'positive' lure. It works upon or seeks to leverage a sense of self-lack in shame or grievance.

Once brought into dependency under a seeming sense of self-inflation, the ability to choke the supply operates as control of the captive mindshare. This can often be run in such a way as to seem to be happenstance, misfortune or hapless mistakes - so as to keep the controller hidden by diversion or painted benignly as the protector from further such ills.

Monopolism ruthlessly seeks and gains control of supply - along with setting up false dependencies invested with real assets and lives. It does so through a myriad of 'fronting' faces. Most especially capturing and effectively running those set up to protect us from abuse of power, so as to deliver us TO what it is fronted as saving us FROM - and in such a way as to reinforce the need for always more funding, more sacrifice, and more dependency. Monopolism seems to be conflict, by which to divide and rule.

I look deeper than the current iteration to the patterns it represents.

The very 'world' we think to 'live' in is framed in beliefs and definitions that can be called our 'narrative' - for narrative is our meaning structure or identification and relationship with ourselves, each other and world. Very few question their experience unless and until they meet incongruity or incoherence they cannot weave into their identity.

In my observation, narrative identity is already a 'masking persona' with personal and social interactions and reinforcements. Masking over truth is an expression of self-conflict or self-lack - or simply self-image, which can also be called self-consciousness as distinct from a gift of self-awareness that is of itself unselfconscious - or uninhibited flow or flowering we call joy in being.

The development of the self-consciousness or ego is an overlay of augmented reality or indeed substitution for reality in which a split off part thinks it is the survivor of a broken whole and must defend against total loss while seeking to regain power or possession of what it no longer commands and so is set to seek as 'control' This 'pattern' is an empty ghost or addictive dependency to leverage over experience no longer recognised as a result of 'splitting off' and locking down in fear-as-control seeking a sense of independent autonomy, under lack or loss of sovereign will - which in the sense I call it is ABSENT coercion, as the free alignment in who we truly recognise and accept ourselves to be.

A true appreciation of itself shines or extends its nature as the basis for a recognition of others in their own freedom of being. Joy in being is the truly 'common purpose' - not groupthink! But under 'separation trauma', a masking narrative seeks reinforcement for without reinforcement the mask has no basis of allegiance or support.

I also note that to a split mind of fear and division, the movement of fulfilment that is of the nature of being in expression (life) operates as the movement of reintegration and healing - as an underlying potential and indeed promise to any willingness of true alignment in it.

How are we so deceived but that we have been long deceived but are only now recognising a profound error.

I know a loving couple who were driving abroad at night and became deeply embroiled in a pressure cooker of argument when becoming lost in a provincial city and regardless who interpreted the map or what instructions were taken, kept going round in circles. I don't recall how they escaped that city - but the complete 'escape' was in recognising they had both been trying to use a map of the wrong city. Laughter replaced every kind of personal resentment, blame and struggle to be right.

The active emotional storm of the current situation far exceeds 'Mr Gold's' capacity to control - but while the reinforcement for the experience is supported, that is being 'lived'.

We support narrative identities by emotional investment regardless of whether it is sympathetic, antipathetic or apathetic.

Owning our feelings, is also feeling them fully, and this also reveals the underlying beliefs that they encapsulate as learned meanings. Feelings are not autonomous realities - but operate AS such by our acceptance and use of them for the conditions that trigger them.

Feeling - as a potential and dimension of knowing, is Open. This is what we have forgotten and why we cannot access our true inherence of being from a point of active defence of a false or mistaken inheritance.

The parasite class - along with its societal support, has painted itself into a corner from which there is no escape and so it climbs into a computer model - in reiteration of its starting place.

'As Is' - Alway Is.

'As If', seems to be, or to define being. And in seeming, shifts and changes and becomes, such that identity is given to reflections of no true substance, and the resulting conflict interpreted as guilt, which is pushed away from self and masked over so as to persist 'as if' in ways that protect its 'self' from fear of pain of loss.

"I’m not a conspiracy theorist"

 https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/09/09/latest-news-129/#comments

"I’m not a conspiracy theorist"

This is the masking in apology to power of those unwilling or unable to speak it.

For it frames the speaker in terms of those who conspire to set the 'officially supported' narratives of what you are and are not allowed to say without penalty.

The hiding or masking off of what cannot be openly acknowledged or said - or can only be said by those given licence by power to say it, is what generates the darkness in which a 'deep state' of subjection is 'explained away' as incompetence and the result of polarising identity in what is must be 'against' in order to belong in its group. Officially sanctioned identities are then used as tools or proxies through which to leverage the choking of others. But all identities are programmed golems - to a unified identifier of 'self-hatred'.

This may seem strong or extreme but look at what self-hatred is and does under mask of virtue.

The sign of not actually BEING a lab rat, and thus no longer playing the role for 'Satanic experiment' (In the sense of Job being created by God as NOT a golem), is of creating a language and expression of living choice or freedom to be, rather than persisting the programmed narrative dictates.

While I hold the 'Satanic' in essence to be form-based reality - rather than the perverse glorification of exulting in form based identity of 'lording it' over the physical or material realm - it is essentially that part of our development  of consciousness that gives set meanings to recognisable forms or patterns. In short the self-programming of conditioning resulting from our own 'unconscious' or preverbal definitions, beliefs and meanings.

If something is set with fearful meanings, it becomes mapped as such and generates a mind that then 'adapts' to operate within the learned 'world' of such meanings - as its experience. As we are not so much unconscious but rather lacking integrative coherence, the pattern or device of setting limits and behaviours becomes fitted to a 'control mindset' for parents, leaders, establishments or dominant factions for the reinforcement and persistence of their role. But control is resorted to where communication breaks down, because in finding our best interests together we willingly align in them, once we share the recognition of where they lay. 

Breakdown of communication is the loss of consciousness as a living relational responsibility, to systems of control.

That billionaire clubs, corporate cartels, and hierarchies of financial dependency all 'conspire' to persist and expand as 'control mentality' is a syndrome that tools or uses their consciousness no less than 'they' then seem to tool ours - for the ONLY communication allowed into such a set of mind is that which supports and reinforces the possession of 'control' as the claim to power and right of existence.

There is no love in it.

There is no peace in it.

There is no joy in it.

There is no virtue in it as a hollow masking in power.

The form is not the reality. The experience of being phished teaches this - but as an identity theft that can run unnoticed while being fooled and tooled.

Releasing the mind from the habit-reactions of what passes as thought but has no power of life - and so is serving a death-mask - is the willingness to accept and embrace Life - but to the tooled mind its seems like loss of face, loss of control and loss of self - and so it is refused, feared and demonised and 'mapped out' by the habit or momentum of a mindset of control - running in our name and thus setting the basis for our perception and response.

Love is the power in life that unifies purpose and response in willing or un-coercive alignment. Fear may seem to unify - but always set over,apart and against. It CANNOT build its 'tower to Heaven' nor its system of control to replace lack of love. But it can and does call you to align in ITS purpose, of sacrificing love to fear for protection, from a root set in self-lack, guilt and shame, in fear of disclosure and penalty. It can only seem to do so through your willingness to persist in ancient archetypes of thought that reiterate an attempt to set forms of control over conflicting and chaotic thought, meaning and self.

The very term 'conspiracy theorist' is a meaninglessness set as weapon or mask against the capacity to freely associate in coherent thought, so as to protect the structure of a 'control mentality'.

The use of meaninglessness tooled as weapon  is masking a lack of love - but this question remains with you; "WHO told you, you were naked?"

Love is as willingness to receive it by extension. It has no set definitions or attributes that can become a counterfeit of substitution for who we are. Yet is the willingness to be with what is as the desire to know the truth here. Not the 'truths' that validate a mask - but truth unmasked. To be naked or transparent to truth is to be unselfconscious to the movement of our being. Listen there.

Remote Viewing; truth, or projective error of contagion?

https://off-guardian.org/2020/09/06/%ef%bb%bffabricating-a-pandemic-who-could-organize-it-and-why/#comment-236354

Casting pearls before swine is no pejorative to those who are not open, interested or ready to see, and so MUST see something else.

But the swine flu scam has recently been encapsulated in a short video called 'The Jab - featuring Glaxo Smith Kline'. (I recommend giving a few minutes of attention to it).

As for the ability to cast your divisions out into a herd of swine and run them off a cliff - what for?

As I see, many points are extremely relevant to 'what is going on' but I share to a willingness of free alignment and this is the discernment of the heart - regardless the SHOUT of mind as archetypal expression.

Regardless whether you read, I am grateful for our exchange for what it brought forth.

- - -

 Anything appended to the I Am, is very real to the mind that accepts it in the moment of its action, and runs upon its archetype as linguistic and cultural constructs with emotional and sensate reinforcements.

Anything specifically denied the I Am sets up a negatively charged 'shadow', no less active for being excluded from acceptance, and release.

But the idea that anyone's remote viewing is infallible would require more shared witness than a personal bio and studies on the writing of history of anything.

The ability of the mind's deceit is that of being able to judge as if true, and then judge the judgement as guilt.

Truth is formless, and whole, and any attempt to put it into the old wine bottles of a world of judgements set in conflict, is the idea of making truth a weapon.

Regardless of anyone's training in how to think or see or articulate and extrapolate from their seeing as a communication within a world of deceits running as mind-control, the capacity to discern truth is not special to the learned - and can be specially hidden to them BY their learning.

I don't dispute your freedom to share what you hold true, in the way that you believe helpful. But regardless the packaging your message conveys the same archetypes as the 'psyop' of guilt, fear and manipulative mind-control.

If you already believe virus theory, (virus as the pathological cause of disease, rather than terrain as the determiner of the cellular expression, communication and function), then you are already looking though a glass darkly or indeed an inverted frame of accepted 'meanings'.

And so the very 'question' can lead the witness to see and report only in the frame of a 'question' that is also a statement, which filters and distorts the result lawfully - in the sense that the answer has logical fidelity to its premise or predicate.

I am not suggesting the possession, control and weaponisation of biology is not a core archetype of the 'control' mind of an active shadow agenda, but that its principle means is the deceit that persists the patterns of the denial that it represents or manifests as conditioned existence.

You suggest getting the concepts across is 'hit and miss' and this suggests to me that the 'processing' is operating an obstruction to the sharing of a willing communication, for at some level you are talking of a willing process of communication - are you not? Or have you been 'forced to see'?

Life IS - and insofar as we (who are life) form idea of what it is - we can say we are a process or indeed dialogue of communication and exchange. I cannot (ever) put a meaning into your reality-experience that is not already there (in which case I didn't put it there but offered a resonant communication to your own recognition. Or more accurately shared (in a) synchronicity.

The process of Communication or love's recognition, is filtered and distorted by the 'terrain' of the current focus that is both unique to each expression and yet within a greater 'patterning' or structure of mutually agreed definition - (but the agreements are energetic resonances - not what we think of as consciousness).

FWIW I see the same basic intent of possession and control - but operating through deceits. And the core deceit is to induce a willing compliance or 'consent' of resonant support for the illusion of possession and control, through the reiteration of 'Separation Trauma' - which we 'experience' as gapped or dissociative struggle, defence, flight or freeze.

Such as I 'see' is the growing of the willingness to recognise the mind by which we are framed or predicated by the self it gives us. But while there is a place for logical and deductive reasoning it must be empirically or better - CURRENTLY - predicated in the living - rather than in a conditioned take running from a previous 'identification'. Else the contagion of a mis-take persists as a mis-identification at odds with its Terrain - ie bubbled off and reflexively denying anything that doesn't  support its seemingly discrete and private domain of possession and control.

I take one paragraph from you and show what I read it as concealing:

"Remote Viewing is very real indeed, but conveying the experience to others that have not experienced the phenomenon is very hit and miss at best. Some people grasp the concepts and others reflexively deny them".

The reality is assigned to the fear-threat and the 'seeing' becomes a vector of contagion of fear-threat, weaponised by moral imperatives to 'infect' with the need for defence by 'grasping' concepts that are generated in response to the seeing.

Anything used as an 'answer' to a problem that is not where the problem can be truly addressed, is operating a diversionary and wishful pathway of thought, that can seem to push the problem from immediate concern or assign it to 'further away' as in separating, distancing, or fear of contagion - that normalises to reflexive defences running as normalise subconscious habit.

What's more, the domain of the wishful or imagined answer, now becomes the framework of the acting out or 'casting' of the now unrecognisable problem.

Anyone can ask and receive answer, but the mind of the question is trained to make statements in the form of questions, and thus seek and find the 'answers' that it had already decided to find.

In the Emperor's New Clothes, it was the untrained and innocent child who unselfconsciously saw truly and exclaimed without any private agenda. Many THINK to understand this in using it to point the finger of nakedness or lack (of substance or integrity) at Others. But when understanding is equated with possession and control, it has been divorced from love and appreciation.

If you think you can understand possession and control from within its predicate then you think to control an absence or lack of love - projected out and away.

Only love can see or recognise and resonate within its Own, and know truly. Not masking in the forms and symbols of love set in grievance, loss and treachery. But the intimate movement of the child's curiosity to ask and be shown according to the movement of the heart's desire.

I am not denying anyone the freedom to live out the timeline of bio-weapons - that use toxic leveraging to undermine innate defences under guise of protection and profit. But what does it profit a man to gain such a world and lose awareness of the qualities of existence of which he can never altogether escape because he does not create his own existence; but only extends the creative through desire for experience of existence.

The fundamental law of sowing and reaping is - as you judge, so are you judged. What then would you see?

Fear hides in the open by the setting up of secrets and lies. Masking in virtue is an attempt to clothe a sense of lack - and pass off as legitimate. Resting in virtue is the capacity to recognise truth in others, and world as self.

One conflicts and the other has no concept of virtue for it has never left its Source.

Both of these are 'in our mind' as potentials of experience.

The parable of the tenant pharma. like that of a prodigal's mis-taken inheritance, gives emphasis to reintegrative recognition and indeed expansion - rather than destruction, whereas Prometheus is framed in the guilt, penalty and pain of retribution cast out in hell as the price to pay for taking the Light in vain.

But did Prometheus ran off with a copy - by which we 'see' through a lens of self-illusion?

To be spellbound in fascination of our own imaged thinking - but for the gnawing at our liver - or is that the call of a long forgotten lover?