Wednesday, 15 February 2017

An Honest Accounting

Robert F Kennedy Jr: “The best thing that could happen to the environment is free-market capitalism.
Article by Jon Rappoport

Robert F Kennedy Jr: “The best thing that could happen to the environment is free-market capitalism.”

Article by Jon Rappoport


This page is of writing into the themes within and beneath the above article.


#1


Yes – what is needed is an honest accounting. False account distorts the record and masks or projects the distortion as threat – and regulates against the true to protect investment in false – and then outsources the pain.

While ‘power and protection’ to evade and outsource (dump) blame and pain are given priority, all else is deferred, kicked to long grass, kept from conscious awareness or falsely associated so as to not connect true cause and effect or logical coherency.

Blame always hides (and dumps) to evade pain. Honest responsibility is a CHANGED ACT and not an account in the ‘economy of the distribution of blame’.

There is a basis on which to accept pain as a truly positive outcome – and that is as the releasing of pain-evasion to the desire for honesty of being and the peace of no longer struggling to live a lie. In this willingness pain is undone rather than suppressed masked or manipulated.

Symptoms remain feedback we can use like a breadcrumb trail. Such as “what would I have to believe true of me to generate this particular experience?”.

I watched RK Jr on episode3 of ‘Vaccines revealed’ recently – and salute his willingness to sanely address and articulate the corrupted and destructive nature of the system in place. Building on false foundations works to attack and deny the true. If you have to FORCE the Good on people be sure it is attempt to false the Good of yourself. Vigilance from true foundation is not already wrong-footed. True-founded is not assertion upon others but a willingness to meet in honesty of being – for no other meeting is real or worthy of sharing, reinforcing and trading as real. Look to the same pattern of denial, projection and dumping in our own trained or conditioned set of mind.

Real change is from the ground up – because the ground of our being is where true communication arises – and is then reflected in our relationships – and in a capacity of leadership that CAN step forth because there IS an energetic support for it.

The liability of Trump is the energetic of anger and hate. If the breaking of the mind-set of denials masking the true, opens to the willingness for truly practical outcomes – then the ‘power’ of vengeance’ is released from its cycle of propagation. But such illusion of power is extremely seductive to triggered rage – as a sense of righteousness of a total dump.

The acceptance of hate as true foundation is the ‘en-trance’ to the matrix. It’s relinquishment is thus the ‘exit’ of captive identity and the opening of creative freedom to explore and experience and expand the structures within a new purpose – that false accounting perverted – but only in expression – and not truly at Cause.


#2


Why wouldn’t honest accounting ‘work’? And in the same honesty brought to science – free it from it’s ‘ape-like’ status of ‘corporate capture’ to explore and discover and share in the true ‘nature’ of the miraculous?

Atlantis is being re-enacted in the current timing. When technology is harnessed to serve hubris – downfall is self-invoked.

Capitalism is a degraded term – like most every other term! – but investing in what profits you is sound when it extends and meets in a sense of true worth. The marketplace is not inherently corrupt, exchange and provision of goods and services is not inherently corrupt. Needs truly met are fulfilment recognised.

Free market can mean freedom to go about your business without being denied and without denying the same right to others. But to corporates mimicking persons it means free to plunder under the aegis of corporately contrived or subverted law.

Laws regulate our lives in ways that seek to control us – rather than hold the balance points of our needs and differences. The desire to grow community from the ground up in solidarity of worth and purpose rises within a fear-defined sense of self and world – with all the control and suppression around issues of status and power and grievance and blame.

So from my perspective the fear-defined sense of self is the false framing regardless whether its agency is external or internal. Nothing built on false foundation can stand – and becomes subverted identity within the matrix of mind-capture.

The fact that mind can be used to generate such a divisive and destructive outcome is testimony to its power – but that power is ‘upstream’ to the mind that thinks it thinks in a body.

Zero point is the all pervading ‘field’ from and within which all that is – is as it is embodying to be. The power of this is unlimited – but the balancing of power with receptivity is the consciousness capacity to live it. Regardless the positives of opening greater power to heal and create – the negatives of destructive ignorance and arrogance CANNOT be allowed beyond their straitjacket without insane consequence – and so some insanity feeds back to awaken response-ability. But until the receptivity awakens – the illusion of power interprets only threat and refuses to recognize consequence as valid feedback. “War on symptoms” is the disease.

So I don’t care what works but that it works for an opening to true communication and relationship in place of the fakery of layers of masking that all testify to the fear of openly being. Not to attack, blame or destroy the mask – but nor to give it power to usurp our true being.

Aligning in what truly moves you is not anything-ism – and if you value this – you accord the same to others – in their own way. You see the word ‘truly’ is redundant – but that the mind short-circuits the actual checking in to feel and know. So ‘truly’ is a note of vigilance against self-deceit – however triggered.


#3


Yes indeed – but my thought goes then to embodying the better way and withdrawing support for what doesn’t work and cannot work – in terms of true fulfilment.

The rest is just thoughts on the theme not a personal response:

Systems run in inputs of energy and indeed of life energy, But life is not really a system nor can be substituted for by a system. Organic relationships unfold out of life. But the interposing and imposing of systems of thought onto life, denies and sacrifices our wholeness of being – that we feel and know as relational communication and exchange, and does so in exchange for a rule-bound mode of control over a fragmented and substituted form of life, which usurps our true will and is accepted and given allegiance as our power and protection.

Mind-capture through fragmentation, polarisation and conflicted self. A bot through which someone else’s ideas run as your mind – in place of you and using your life.

The cause of the symptoms of error is reflected in in all its symptoms but hidden by their framing or presentation. While the framing is invisible, we live the ‘reality’ it dictates and presume the identity it confers.

Private agenda ignores, discards and overrides relational being – excepting as it enters the balance sheet. If we fit ourselves to a mask of deceit we unfit ourselves of our humanity, and mask our choice by layers of justifications, and blame – so as to define the error as reality – or the human condition – which makes truth threatening and dangerous and a call for defence against it – to disrupt and divert attention so as to present a self-justified assertion rather than be exposed ‘unfit’.

The people of the lie associate ‘salvation’ with separation, conflict and private gratification. For the wish that inputs life energy to a loveless system is active and defended against change.

And as the lie is seen as power and protection at the very foundations of our ‘reality’ or self – it is not only ‘too big to fail!’ – but necessary to continue to sacrifice to – to sacrifice our children, our people, our minds and our lives to. For a sense of power and protection, within the cage.

Honest account is the basis for honesty of being – in act, word and witness. “Let the dead bury the dead”, makes sense to me. Walk out from the cage of a false mind – without persisting in it. Instead of ‘rules’ you now have to truly listen, feel and discern what is truly relevant instead of sleepwalking within the jamming signal.


#4


I read that the energy cartels (monopoly control of market) – with its enormous financial resources subverted the primary educational establishments with ‘philanthropic’ gifts and grants with ample research and study grants and the career opportunities.

Corporate capture of the law brought this about – lawyers who work to usurp the law to serve private agenda. The same with Banking. All arenas of influence are effectively captured.

The ‘medical’ cartel may be larger and more influential and destructive than the military industrial complex – but are they not part of the consolidation of wealth and power in the very very few?

My primary sense of value is in needs met.

Whatever system – if needs are not met – miser-y.

I don’t mean abstracted schemata of classified ‘needs’ – but the core needs through which the worth of living appreciates by appreciation. Need is not neediness – for the former is a point of fulfilment and the latter a manipulative leverage.

‘Capitalism’ is an ism. I just wrote here about isms:

https://off-guardian.org/2017/02/02/john-pilger-the-hijacking-of-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-54950


#5


How can an ‘ism’ be a cause when by definition a suffix of ‘ism’ means like something else or of the same idea? The crafty deceit is in labelling the ism as if it pigeonholes it away as if a ‘known’ entity.

It’s like a diagnosis. Some love a diagnosis as a self-validation, but others no longer feel seen as a result of being categorized as a condition.

Some WANT a stronger mask and some WANT communication free of the mask.


If the presentation of your beiefs matters more than living them, then they are NOT beliefs but a mask over the actual beliefs.


Because there is a vast repository of guilt and fear beneath the surface mind – as unconscious or un-faced fears and lack of worth – manipulators can and do tap into the willingness of others to adopt identity as if their own! – and defend it with all the force that the desire NOT to expose and encounter such fear – while seeming to be ‘part of the answer’ relative to the other identities seen as the problem.


The of the use of identity ‘politics’ as a trojan to deconstruct social structure is clear to see – unless part of the polarised reaction that takes the bait rather than identify the ruse.


#6


Thankyou. OK.

What you call ’causes’, I call false framing narrative in which a fake ‘conscious’ ness substitutes for an actual conscious experience. Not that consciousness is absent so much as defined in ways that misidentify and defend the very ideas and actions that limit or block awareness of consciousness by engaging in ceaseless compulsive activity. Like being so engaged in a movie that the situation in which it is being watched – and the technology of its delivery – is effectively discarded or rendered peripheral and ignored.

What you call ignorance = I call unconscious.

What you call arrogance = guilt-driven.

The use of guilt terms is the recycling of the projection device that keeps you in the theatre.

One seems to escape the sins of laziness and refusal by assigning them to the choices oand intentions of others.

The use of the term ‘beliefs’ for emotion-backed opinion or assertion is normal – but is only what one says or asserts and presents to self and other as one’s self. ‘I am a this-ist and oppose that-ism’. So yes I agree with you that opinion and belief are interchangeable excepting opinions are ventured while beliefs may be held private, and false opinions and beliefs are generally adopted to escape penalty because the function of such a masking persona is a defensive protection through which to persist in attempt to validate or find support for a sense of self under threat or in doubt.

The self-doubt is pushed down to unconsciousness by the fear that it is weakness and that such vulnerablity will meet rejection, attack and denial. HERE is the ignorance/arrogance cause!

So rather than discover what the true nature of the conflict is to its resolution, a sense of fragmented self defines itself as the power to fragment, segregate off or divide and RULE. Ruling out the disclosure of self-honesty operates the basis of ruling over the consciousness – so in that sense yes it is a REFUSAL to listen or uncover the truth in blind arrogance to determine it as its own private agenda and interprets ONLY to support its core agenda – opening only to get ammunition or more leverage over adversity it sees as enemy to be overcome, eradicated or invalidated.

Though this is played out in experience as a cast of personae and props within a complex web of symbols, covered by layers of archetypal meanings, and rigidified in derivatives of derivative concepts – the Whole Thing represents an ‘attack on Self’ which IS an oxymoron used as an extension – and reflection of identity.

The false flag is the primary displacement of blame by which to justify an opposing identity to the feared invalidation, threat of loss or denial of existence.

The terror is identified with as real BY the attempt to hide, evade, overcome or fix it. Despite and because of our ‘success’ in such device, we have a world that operates ‘war on terror’ in two directions at once; the suppression of feared emotional states and associated thoughts and actions, and a narrative device of dissociation, displacement and active (attacking) defence.

This model of self may become wise to that it needs ‘enemy’ and conflict to ‘survive’ or maintain ‘power’ – so as to nurture and generate discord, sickness and strife as the ‘conditions’ by which to feed. But to so so must sacrifice residual awareness of Self in any remaining sparks of feeling-recognition for life. The forms that this takes in themselves are not the defining characteristic, but the covering over and denial of the sense of self-betrayal – that may both freeze out from capacity to feel and burn in intensity of conflicted rage – at the same time.

If the attempt to remake the Self in one’s own image yields such evil fruits – it does not mean that we are condemned, rejected, abandoned and unworthy – so much as victim to our own conviction – given priority over truth.

“Even as you do unto the least (worthy) among you, you do unto Me” – is not a piling of blame on a sinnner – but a reflection of a recognition by which to look with new eyes upon our living world, our fellow man/woman and our self – for these three are one relational balance.

A misidentifiction must defend against the true – even if unaware of that it is running on a false premise. Dissonance and incoherent experience is the faithful feedback to a faulty or untrue foundation.

So yes guilt and fear need more than the belief that they don’t belong in true Self – they need uncovering to resolution within a reintegrative movement of Self. In some ways this is like a rubber band in that healing is the effect of the natural movement of our being when the distorting influence is released or not used, but such is the entrained conditioning of belief and identity that the movement of wholeness of being meets ‘resistance’, opposition, conflict and confusion – particularly in the first waking to a changed purpose. Old habits are old choice-patterns and will only be replaced by more consciously aligned choices – from an honesty of being that owns and thus can change its core beliefs and definitions rather than blindly acting out from them in search of validation and reinforcement that Life does not support – for it is not the Life of you but an image or self-concept given power of belief.

Be live what you will – but check that you will is your truly fellt desire and response and not a surrogate mask of presented ‘beliefs’ by which to seem to be what you are not. Be vigilant then, for your peace – so that deceits show up immediately and can be nipped in the bud and mapped out from your current and fresh sense of your being. One does not release the unwanted by actively seeking not to have it. That is how to keep it while blaming everyone else as a way of mitigating the burden. Self-forgiveness is the release by which the presence of one’s being rises to a conscious recognition and the extension of appreciation in gratitude. This must fly in the face of all prior conditioning and yet any glimpse of the spark of life more abundant is a call to a true choice amidst the false mind-matrix of the refusal to listen – as the stubborn insistence on ‘going it alone’.


#7


Yes, arrogance IS ignorance and vice versa. This is not apparent – for ignorance is blindness and arrogance proceeds unknowingly but with some sense of self justification or righteousness.

So one can blindly react in ignorance and arrogance to one who you perceive AS ignorant and arrogant – or stupid.

The refusal to SEE is the assertion of an identity that DEPENDS on NOT seeing.

The ‘possession’ of an identity is both ways – that is if you identify in something – it possesses or defines YOU!

The matrix is nothing more – nor less – than mind-identification or mind-control – for that is what it SEEMS to give you – that’s the trade off for what seems to be power and freedom – in an ignorance of what the shadow-side of the definition rejects or ignores.

Scepticism is at least open to the possibility that – if investigated and found valid – the mind will change to incorporate new information that does not fit the current set or identity.

Cynicism is not at all open to ANY other reality than its identity dictates – and to which its allegiance is in fact a hidden form of gullibility.

Gullibility is the acceptance and allegiance to information without question because its source is considered trustworthy or unquestionable. Its lack of faith in its own ability to know, embodies a fearful or self invalidating belief that obedience and conformity are necessary to avoid penalty and pain.

Cynicism hides in the pretence of scepticism – so as to presume the scientific or intellectual high ground from which to invalidate any rival or threat of change to its established identity that is aligned with as power and protection from lack or loss of identity.

But what truly identifies us? And what is a masking evasion or forced assertion in fear of being identified invalid?

While the blame culture is engaged – there is no dropping of the guard to actually find our anything – apart from gathering information to use to bolster one’s own or undermine the other.

The idea that we have our OWN participation that which limits and pains and threatens us is seen as a weakness we cannot afford to let in – especially if true! And the anger that is directed at anyone implying self-responsibility for our situation – because responsibility is equated with BLAME instead of FREEDOM.

I am not responsible for your choices – but I am responsible for how I choose to see and respond to you. If I give power to you to ‘make me feel ‘less than I am – or indeed more than I am’ – then I can hold grievance by which you hold me hostage – because unless you change, I am diminished – and so I seek to make you change or hate you for what you represent.

If you inflate my ego – and I buy into it – then I grow upon a conditionality that cannot be maintained – and will change to reveal the fears and evasions or aversions that sought out illusions of escape. ‘Love’ turns to hate – when love is demanded or required to maintain appearances in which two or more identify. That is not love, but sacrifice of self-honesty.

Self-honesty is nothing added or taken away from what is here. The perfection of this cannot be imagined from any perspective within the attempt to make real, or get something back. When another accepts you as you are – you feel love – without any emotional transaction taking place. When we are not accepting of ourself – we cannot be this for others – but instead play out our own issues on who we take them to be.

Thanks for opening this consideration for me.


#8


A future that may already be here in proto is that of biomass. So your pig meat cells mutiply as biomass cultured in conditions of no mobility, relationship or indeed “life as we know it, Jim”. And that loss of true consciousness is what I see as the negative harvest of those whose static identity seeks private gratification uninterrupted by complex and upsetting emotional confusions.

I observe that as we do unto others so is it done to ourselves. The notion that humans are predated upon, experimented on and pharmed for sacrifice or sucking out of their life energy is not a fantasy plot for a novel or movie.

A managed existence is a mere existence or a hollow ritual enactment of a life. If you want better plants – and pigs – nurture the true health of the soil – which – like our gut biotica – is a highly complex symbiosis of interrelationship at the micro-level. I hold this a true metaphor for society. A top down corporate canopy that sucks all the life up and blocks out growth for what would become a biodiverse and rich economy – is asking for a breakdown because it is killing its own support network.

As it stands seed beds of creativity are allowed only to be marketized and weaponized or squelched. Control and inventiveness yes – but creativity is associated with freedom to be – that monocultural state religion is predicated on denying and substituting in place of.


#9


There are innumerable organic and biodegradable or recyclable ways to package goods but while pollution is paid by others pain and money – these not only wont be developed they’ll be suppressed.

If we import crap – we are accepting crap. Regulations of corporate contrivance open the door to crapping everyone while sucking up the energy of power and privilege.

But regulations on behalf of wholeness can refuse crap. If globalism operated for a true wholeness of being instead of corporate-led takeover – then life on Earth can be facilitated rather than captured and pharmed under mind-control. (The corporates are only a tool of global domination – once they’ve broken the capacity to oppose or resist or challenge – they’ll be fragmented and controlled by the same power they took as their own).

True needs are relational communications allowed to happen and coming to fruit. The power-seeker gets between the need and the need met to own and control the channel of supply – and once leveraging influence to generate false needs to supply and set up dependencies.

It is the same old deceiver it ever was.

I hope Kennedy starts with the CDC and its drive for mandatory vaccines. Fake science is a kingpin in the whole system. Captured regulation is the absence of true governance.

It always starts with a Trojan Horse – some idol imported or injected into our mind that carries a deadly payload. Perhaps we need concrete un-hideable examples of how we are deceived and the cost it exacts – and not a token sacrificial ‘damage control’ operation to seem to change when nothing really does.


#10


Corporate capture of regulations advances through ‘Trade Deals’ to indemnify themselves against loss and break open any regulations that would hold check on destructo-capitalism or cartel monopoly.

So it is the law that need restating or restoring in terms of true account and responsibility for consequence. As you know there is little advocacy for people when corporates combine with state and institutions of media , science, and education to pharm humans along with stripping resource or profit out of anything else without regard for consequence that falls to others.

But the house of cards is a pack of lies – and runs by passing of as true. Corporate capture is also known as mind capture.


#11


Hitler was financed by international corporate cartels and banks that include proto EU as well as Wall st banks.

When BIG money backs a movement it may seem to be a power in itself and present itself to a destroyed and humiliated people as a saviour and restoring of power and land – but the money and industry held the purse strings and supply lines – and were not held culpable at Nuremberg – but went on to positions of influence. The show goes on…

No comments:

Post a Comment