"what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?"

 Coalition Britain: how has David Cameron affected the UK's reputation?

Few dispute that the UK has lost influence on the world stage – but what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?

When I read the heading - and particularly the sub headline - which titles this entry, I felt no call to read further - for anything predicated on such basis is inherently meaningless or insane.


- - -

"what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?"
This sort of poor excuse for 'thinking' is the nature of the 'problem.
Clarify the definitions - the foundational lens through which we cognize, and all else reveals itself.
Investing in "what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?", may operate in the guise of self protection or an expansion of the capacity to control or manipulate an outcome and thus everyone may willingly blind themselves to the whole - and their integral part within it - in favour of a self-assertive 'divide and rule' mentality that is essentially at war with Life because it is at war on one's self.
There IS a natural honesty of being that CAN be experienced THROUGH willingness and desire to have it. Although the act of exclusively focussing upon or 'seeing'. "what’s gone wrong and who is to blame?" will provide a script of self-justification - a justifiction - in which the OTHER or the EXTERNAL carries the major "blame", it simply operates as a deceit by which to choose against the true of one's being and SEEMING to 'get away with it'.
However the symptoms of DIS-EASE are packaged, toxic debt is the false currency operating as guilt - backed by the FEAR-standard. To base our identity in fearful and shameful - BLAMEFUL - self-definition is to GUARANTEE war, scarcity, deprivation, dysfunction, loss - oh the list goes on but you get the drift.
To drift into a negative or self-fragmenting disposition is a result of NOT living consciousness responsibility. However, we can never truly LOSE our being and it will pick us up the moment we open to listen and integrate with it. Responsibility is a NOW-ability of response, from re-cognition - from a fresh take - from a fresh take - from a fresh take.
Or one can defend a 'point of view' that honestly evaluated, has no true foundation in your joy. Choice is the nature of our human existence and disguising choice within deceitful manipulations is ONE of our CHOICES. One CANNOT change what one first does not OWN. The blame game guarantees non-ownership of false definitions through a sort of negative version of 'pass the parcel'. It works to keep us in the dark. It is a choice made IN the dark. But now you have read this you are within the responsibility of your conscious choice. You are not 'victim' to conditioning excepting you have yet to honestly acknowledge its operation through the use to which you put your mind. Live from a truly integrative disposition and KNOW your participance.

The attempt to impose order upon perceived 'Other'

Obama Builds a New Country One Immigrant at a Time?

White House Plans to Develop a "Country Within a Country" of 15 Million "New Americans" ... The White House has plans to legalize 13 to 15 million illegal immigrants who will then establish a "country within a country." – Independent Sentinel

- See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36126/Obama-Builds-a-New-Country-One-Immigrant-at-a-Time/


This article is one of many that attempts to read the 'power game' that unfolds in human affairs. My comment is no less to some of the comments of others to the issues of power, and liberty.

- - -
The attempt to impose order upon perceived 'Other'

Anything can be used as a weapon - and deceit and disguise operate to disable or circumvent defences. Thus grow ever more sophisticated ways of embodying hate or loveless intent. However, complex the forms in which it is presented, hate still operates a false currency of joylessness, easily discernible by the joyous, but traded in as real by those who sacrifice joy in order to get something special for themselves alone - who operated in masked or private agenda amidst ever shifting powers and deceits as if THAT is life, and joy is in winning it at another's expense.

The idea of rationality based upon ideals of individual  and collective freedom is itself a trojan horse via which the feudal system was broken open and replaced. Beliefs that can be incepted or propagated and established as currency of exchange, operate as a falsely framed "reality" in which freedom is substituted for by struggle within and upon a conflicted experience of self and world.
Materialism, is the idea of external 'creator' imposing meaning upon a subjective and split off self-sense - necessarily at war with everything. The belief in objective 'Reality' arises from making a 'god' out of the agreement to a private 'creatorhood' self-experience. The immediate reflection of operating coercive will upon Life is of being victim to coercion, and believing it, because one establishes its reality in oneself by WANTING coercive will to be true. But blinded by its own attack, it does not recognize it is its OWN, but makes identity of victimhood and subjection in loss and disconnection from Life - which is denied and substituted for by self-assigned and asserted meanings in the name of 'self-protection' and 'self'-advantage, which grows reinforcement from mutual agreement or usage.

Premises are EVERYTHING, for a false premise can only result in a conflicted outcome, regardless its initial promise of answer or escape. What then is a true foundation?
Surely, this is best answered by waking up to, and owning the false. For while the false is operating through the mind, unawares, one is operating from a premise of subjection; of being externally defined. It is true that the experience OF the world and its scripts is initially dependent upon acquiring and internalizing core definitions in which fear plays a part, but it is not true that thoughts leave the mind of the thinker - although they do extend to other minds because that is the nature OF mind.

The 'private possessor' mentality is as the tenant farmers in Jesus' parable who when the Master was absent, killed his messengers, for they would 'inherit' for themselves alone. This prodigal error effect an attack upon communication itself. Thus would truth be the first casualty but that division would invoke coercive rule in place of unified perspective - excepting truth cannot be attacked but only covered over with false witness. The belief that truth can be attacked is the belief that makes materialism.  But it is an image or idea, definition or idol of truth that is attacked.

Within the idea of materialism is the war-mind of conflicted self, and the fear mind of freezing and limiting consciousness from further pain. Attempting to change 'other' coercively and fearfully resisting change in fear of loss. For power (in its worldly sense) to seek to impose itself upon the 'other' of the powerless so as to persist and prevail, is simply a job description. That's what it does.
True power is shared - not from a premise of separate competing interests but from a true willingness. Of course the power-monger does not choose to dissociate from his power-defined identity. But true power is not about coercing someone ELSE or manipulating outcomes. It is the expression of the freedom to be who and what you are, in the living moment, and As the living moment. This communicates witness to Life free of coercion or persuasion, as the condition in which to know and be known truly - without need or call of a masked agenda.

The practicality arises from the recognition of the impracticality or dysfunction of the false premise and its ownership and release for true. Whatever goes on, we make choices from who we accept ourselves to be and how we perceive our situation. To be defined fearfully is to be already a victim, already under tyranny, and thus is hardly a surprise to see such mindset pictured in our world in all kinds of guises.

Consciousness Engineering

The Folly and Presumption of the Social Engineers
By Richard Ebeling - at the Daily Bell

One of the social mythologies of our time is that it is in the power and ability of governments to remake society in any image or shape that those with political authority consider "good," "right" and "just" for mankind. No other idea has caused more horror and hardship in modern times. - more

Social Engineering can take many forms and serve different purposes. Parenting has its place and at times the role is quite apart from the appearance - i.e.: there are times when a child is to be listened to an recognised for wisdom and the 'parent' be in the 'role' of learner.
But guidance and education are one thing - whereas coercion is another.

'Consciousness engineering' sets up the foundation from which and as which a coercive mindset operates. This is not really addressed by personal-political agendas - all of which are tied by reaction TO achieving or coercing an outcome - even if it is simply a negative goal of identifying AGAINST other.

We all share a Universal motivation - towards the good, the pleasurable and the positive and away from the bad, painful and negative AS WE EACH DEFINE ourselves in any situation to be. Then it can be seen that definition is operating as the 'shadow' power that limits perspective and determines perception - AND THEREFORE EXPERIENCE.

The framing of perception in ideas is the magic of redefining experience as an asserted expression of a personal sense of power - felt to be DIFFERENT from the innate or natural 'Life Purpose'. This act constitutes the sense of 'individual' consciousness that seems to be disconnected from the whole and threatened by the reintegration of Wholeness.
True individuality is a unique indivisibility, but an engineered consciousness has been subjected to 'divide and rule' - that is - it is a split off mentality operating parasitically upon the whole in SUBSTITUTION for true presence, relation or communication.

Ultimately - indeed actually - this operates as a 'self-attack' - not unlike a black op false flag, or psy-op - by which to use 'evil' to justify acting in likewise loveless and blind exploitation of 'Other' - for a seeming self-interest which works against one's Good and one's true Presence.

The 'world' is reflecting back the CONSCIOUSNESS that we are engaging, identifying and validating by acting from it. To dissociate from the error is not to fight it, but to uncover it where it is... in our own consciousness participation.

Any attempt to engineer the world - the Outside - the Otherness of our living relationships... is part of the automatic attempt to protect and maintain the separate-self-sense of personal power that operates by grievance, scarcity and conflict.

Of course 'engineering' can mean the considering of all forces in play, and the balancing them within wholeness to alignment of whole purpose. It has been said that a divided house cannot stand. A mind at war with itself cannot BUT undermine and sabotage itself in all its endeavours. Wholeness of purpose may be attempted via the negative or segregative will, but the 'elite' will never be a unified expression of Living Will - for fear is incapable of truly integrated purpose. It can only force or coerce, trick and deceive in order to SEEM almost all powerful and then only be limiting and controlling all expression. But to such an appetite, there is never 'enough' control - because control cannot bring the fruits that the fearful deceit promised.

Insanity multiplies in the mind of the lie. Truth does not need to be asserted, to be true, but it can be rested in, wholly. If you truly enjoy something, it is not a struggle - even if it contains challenge. The sacrifice of joy led to the pain of its loss and subsequent redefinition within socially engineered frameworks. Struggling with frameworks simply evolves a cat and mouse complexity of more sophisticated beguilement and entanglement. Embracing the true joy of being MUST bring to the surface and HEAL all that would 'engineer' you out of your own existence - your own presence in communication and relationship... in Life. There is a different order of control within Life that is NOT a SEEMING separateness acting upon the flow of Life - but the discernment of the part/whole relationship as a totality WITHIN Life.

Truth shall show you you ARE free. In truth your word is the self-DEFINITION you accept and thereby share - albeit unknowingly or 'unconsciously'. All the clamour of the world that agitates the mind is serving the purpose of distracting and diverting attention AWAY from a false self-definition that would NOT STAND in the light of simple awareness - and so its survival depends on YOUR allegiance to it as YOUR mind. But notice the mind that limits filters and distorts the ONLY THING GOING ON - 'Life' - can just as well align with and serve Life. All things in the world serve double purpose - that is they can serve the purpose YOU accept as a result of correctly identifying what is NOT you and releasing it as a foundation from which to live. Of course this calls for self-honesty and of course the allegiance to a war-mind cannot afford honesty for truth is its first casualty. Self attack is insanity of denying one's true presence. Nothing that follows on from it can grow true fruit. The insane project their fear and hate onto other personalities and fail to recognize it is their own - but fight the love that would restore them TO THEIR OWN - because that is the ONLY freedom. One cannot change what one first does not own, and nor can one meet or become what one is not the vibration of.

Let the 'bad guys' show up residually un-owned false definitions and beliefs so as to undo them, that otherwise would operate 'in the dark' in your name forever. Let them serve the truing purpose YOU set. Ultimately - that means actually - we are not free to escape what is our own. We cannot un-know or not become 'other' to what we truly are - though of course one is free to deny freedom in asserting such futility over and over, and over again.

There are many channels to choose from and perspectives to view from - but is the basis of choice fear-driven or joy driven? It is Life-driven but fear or joy are a matter of your self-definition. Each can masquerade as the other in a mind that sought to hide in confusion. To define one's joy in terms of being protected from one's fears is to give power away.

The Folly and Presumption of the Social Engineers

One of the social mythologies of our time is that it is in the power and ability of governments to remake society in any image or shape that those with political authority consider "good," "right" and "just" for mankind. No other idea has caused more horror and hardship in modern times. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/36125/Richard-Ebeling-The-Folly-and-Presumption-of-the-Social-Engineers/?uuid=6F80D9F3-5056-9627-3C0CA91B0E668782#sthash.jafBv2b9.dpuf

One of the social mythologies of our time is that it is in the power and ability of governments to remake society in any image or shape that those with political authority consider "good," "right" and "just" for mankind. No other idea has caused more horror and hardship in modern times. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/36125/Richard-Ebeling-The-Folly-and-Presumption-of-the-Social-Engineers/?uuid=6F80D9F3-5056-9627-3C0CA91B0E668782#sthash.jafBv2b9.dpuf

One of the social mythologies of our time is that it is in the power and ability of governments to remake society in any image or shape that those with political authority consider "good," "right" and "just" for mankind. No other idea has caused more horror and hardship in modern times. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/36125/Richard-Ebeling-The-Folly-and-Presumption-of-the-Social-Engineers/?uuid=6F80D9F3-5056-9627-3C0CA91B0E668782#sthash.jafBv2b9.dpuf

Faith in Life!

Monsanto Laments Dwindling Faith in Science

Following on from the last entry, because someone addressed my comment thus:

Praetor commented:

You, speak of Soul and the Physical Biological World, that be the reason we are all here, how to live in solid physical world, while having a soul (spirit) and making it work, can it be done, that is the question? The answer to that question, TIME will tell. The two are separate and are now one, can the two be one or should they remain separate. I surmise, that is the great experiment, can they be one? The soul requires only peace and love, the physical requires everything nature can provide (food, water, air, sleep, rest and everything else to stay alive), so the higher mind has set in motion, where we are, and the out come is up to us, to make it work, will we make it work???

I speak of Consciousness. Consciousness OF physicality is part and parcel of BELIEVING and experiencing ourselves as a separated "mind" within a body within a physical universe of bodies. That one CAN experience and identify as this separated persona is evident. But no one is IN such a world any more than a wish can replace truth.

The notion of 'separateness' operates the lens darkly by which to experience a reversal of consciousness. However, there are limits to the ability or capacity of believing and identifying in the untrue. Pain and meaninglessness being chief among them.

Thinking without true relationship is a disconnected thought-mind - but mind is not, can not, will never, exist as an actually independent entity. While such thinking asserts its 'self', there are no ears to hear.

Whatever Life Is, already is, and is working perfectly. Each of us and all of us together are our own 'experiment' or theme of experience and exploration.

The nature of consciousness itself is integral to my experiential relationship and discovery. It is of course my joy or natural calling - along with the embodiment of an integrated consciousness. It is all a matter of perspective.

When ideas run - or are accepted into your mind, they are experienced as perception. Regarded as reality and then reacted to and acted upon as if true. By the power of your acceptance do ideas run in your mind. Fear usurps the mind but only while you give it the power to do so.

Will you - regardless of what anyone else chooses - choose to align with what you resonate most honestly as true of you in relevance to your current experience? I suggest that although this could be seen as a matter of time, it is truly a matter of willingness.

Holding onto a mistaken investment is like supporting a lie, for it costs the joy of a true movement of being, in which Soul reveals itself evident as Living Context rather than being demanded in sacrifice to a 'blind god'. Identity is investment. But to release all things to Source is to BE identified perfectly. One cannot bring love into fear but as sacrifice to fear's 'reality', but fears can be brought to love in willingness FOR Perspective.

It is all a matter of perspective - and that the choice to assert and coerce is the limiting and losing of perspective. Of course there is another way. But until there is a willingness, it does not appear. To find willingness, one may have to first honestly acknowledge and own one's wilfulness or unwillingness. There is fear, pain and anger in guilt that invalidates Life. There is a messenger here to be received. One never meets 'the world' but through one's own psycho-emotional-physical construct.

The opposite of blind (private agenda) coercive manipulation of Life is yielding (private agenda) into Life.

One cannot serve two masters of opposite and exclusive directions.

Faith in Life is implicit, the instant one recognizes the false as false, for the true stands evident and in that knowing is it simply obvious one IS Life and not somehow 'outside and apart and acting upon it'.

You cannot experiment UPON yourself who Are One Self. But you can engage in conception and perceive idea in which fear seems to split or fragment such a consciousness. Isolate and alone. But how could such a game of powers be played without rival, adversary, ally and enemy?

"It's Life, but not as we know it Captain".

Perhaps the 'third eye' is our true front ear. And 'space' is not 'out there after all, but reflecting an embracing awareness of All That Is. Time serves the unfolding script. But time is running out for the script to remain hidden. Does mon santo mean 'my holy'? Is that not the error in identification in a nuts-hell? For what you give (idea) is what then gives you. 'Thy holy' is a willingness to honour and acknowledge the presence of Life in Creation - that appears perhaps to be a world outside you. Do this 'just because' and not in order to 'get', and you will simply align with the true of you - and have the reflection.

Integrity is true relation.

Faith in illusion?

Monsanto Laments Dwindling Faith in Science

The Daily Bell comments on the memes - on the current ideas - being propagated or incepted in the body politic. I recommend reading the article and some of the comments.
http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36120/Monsanto-Laments-Dwindling-Faith-in-Science/


The term 'faith in science' is an interesting term to choose.
Conscious faith is accorded what is accepted true of oneself, but blind faith gives power to ideas as ideals and indeed as idols.
That which is accepted true is given protection and investment, and the wish that distorts perception to serve the purpose of the perceiver is the ego-centric identification within attempt to 'control' reality; to exercise power over Consciousness, Life, Self and Other. This is not at all obvious to a mind that is designed to hide its power behind a sense of limitation, deprivation and lack. And it is impossible to convince such a mind that it is suffering delusion excepting by waking as the perspective upon illusion. This occurs spontaneously when the illusion disintegrates as a believable reality. When one's experience increasingly calls it into question and reveals lack of foundation where once seemed solid.

Clarifying our definition reveals a greater perspective. I use the term 'scientism' as distinct from the discipline of Science, I also see technologism as the inevitable effect of materialism - the materialism which operates as the active denial of Consciousness whereby to assert personal power upon a 'dead' universe in which death is the only natural outcome and where a kind of living death substitutes for real relationship. Materialism in this sense gets or sucks energy from relationships that it actually does not recognize AS relationship - because materialism ONLY sees relationships as a means to GET from.

The search for truth or the willingness to receive its illumination, can operate on many levels - all of which converge in a genuine willingness and capacity FOR relationship - because truth is a relationship and not an 'object' to be possessed, or used as a means of gaining control or power OVER Life.

The worship of coercive power is the religion of materialism. Everything derives its meaning from the god its serves for such is the nature of Source - or for what is accepted as a true foundation from which to live. And so 'science' as a tool of power is not concerned with true - but only with the power to make or subvert truths to its agenda. And to obfuscate its actions within complex layers of defence and diversion.

I look forward to rediscovering Reason and Science in cultural renewal, as a result of the deconstruction and exposure of the mind that would manipulate private or blind agenda at expense of the whole - including its own true interests. This exposure is not 'in the world' though our minds are reflected there. Deceit projects the unwanted and the rejected out from self onto world - where it may battle it or study it or engage in any form of apparent relationship with it, as long as it is kept apart and away.

A human world that poisons and destroys itself while engaging delusions of grandiosity and abject powerlessness is an expression of faithlessness - of giving faith to that which undermines integrity - which dis-integrates, segregates and struggles for power to 'survive'.
This 'self' is insane or operating from a 'disconnect'. Once one SEES it, withdrawal of investment is inevitable. Therefore it operates deceit by which to seem to provide power and protection. Divisions of conflict, fear and doubt trigger existential fears that call upon the re-enactment of the separation or split consciousness. This technique is so over used now that it too is wearing thin.
The mind - in the sense I am referring to the split-minded consciousness, is a trickster; an evasion, an attempt at denial or refusal of Life as Relationship, Communication and Creation of such extension and embodiment of presence. Refusing division is being of one mind by abandoning the drama of self - that is by pausing to listen or receive. The term 'higher mind' points to inspiration, intuition and discernment. Use it or lose it. But one cannot actually disconnect from the Consciousness of which one exists. One can only generate the experience of disconnection in subjectivity to power now seeming outside of and generally hostile to oneself; materialism.

Selling your faeces? No shit!

Why celebrities might start selling their faeces
On evidence of inheriting characteristics from the donor, the market moves to open the bowel?

In the book; The Heart's Code, a wide variety of information is presented - albeit in a casual format, that includes many compelling witness to aspects of consciousness being inherited by donors. The heart is not 'just' a pump - much as some disconnect-minded scientist wish it be true. Now there is more and more evidence that the gut is a much more important function to the health of the whole - including brain function - and is also imbued with the resonance of the consciousness of its donor.
However, the idea of getting qualities from others is not new. The bath-oiled skin scrapings from renowned Roman soldiers fetched a good price in it's day. And also from the qualities in nature. However, one must match the quality in another to carry and be it oneself. In the case of a donor, there is a willingness of relating - of opening. Even sex opens our psychic being to qualities of 'otherness' that we may integrate and blend or reject and suffer. Seeking to get from others what one does not believe to exist in one's self, is the transaction of a scam. Receiving in gratitude for help that one consciously asks for and accepts operates an inbuilt safety - because only honour and gratitude is given to the one who gives freely - no strings attached.
Fear not the Gift of Life and be vigilant against the scam that promises to add to a sense of un-worth - as if to validate it. Doesn't work that way. Never will.

No Big Bang

One of many articles positing Big Bang may not be demanded by alternate model of Universe:

Big Bang Didn't Happen? New Theory Suggests Universe Has No Beginning, No End




The model is 'all in the mind' - albeit in broad mutual agreement. I am in no doubt that Reality is Mind and that any holographic microcosm of Mind can yield or release its personal identification investment in mutual definitions and know - and I say know - Existence with no shadow of doubt or interference of any kind. But One - any one cannot share or give or communicate any facet OF Existence but through some degree of self definition in relation to the aspect of Existence that is moving as the focus of current desire. However, self-definition is not necessarily exclusive and indeed is free to shift perspective - infinitely. A Universe of Living Information or Communication that extends the Time-less Infinite as Idea is not 'inside anyone's skull'. But materialism diminishes Consciousness almost to want to render it obsolete - excepting as a leverage of technologism that in fact turns out to be directed by a private personal agenda after all. This is evident in cultural, social and political thought and consequent behaviour.

It really is a matter of perspective. But the mind of 'command and control' has science derailed from its desire to uncover truth into a presumed neutral and verifiable determination of truth. But all of it is model which may serve some purposes and hinder others.

The alarm bell for a scientist or seeker of truth in any kind of approach is the symptoms that reveal a biased agenda. When science identifies institutionally it has an ego and can be seen to operate a self protectionism of the establishment. Believing neednt be a weak attempt to hold something true to ward off self doubts. For by belief is experience of had. The key - I feel to offer, is to stand in one's belief as one's presence extending as willingness to relate or communicate as part of an ever new appreciation. The belief is a decision in consciousness that operates more as a navigational pathway or channel of communication than as a shield or sword.

But the core Idea of violence as Creation is deeply embedded into the traumatised collective human consciousness and colours everything until it is observed instead of running a program unnoticed. The Idea of no time or timelessness - from which and in which EVERYTHING that is, is and is known to be in the Mind that it is OF, offers a release from the limiting, splitting, warring, mentality that has characterised the human condition for millennia and yet is a conditionING that can be observed and released for a more joy-aligned choice. This is not anti-science for joy is also our genius or more aptly, a channel through which Life Shares Meaning. Of course one can turn one's back on joy and make sacrifice of consciousness, the 'creation' of a self-sense in its own power, but never free of grievance and vengeance no matter how one used magic and rationality to present otherwise.

So busy looking out because of fear that within is an invalidation of self. Its a kind of scam. But one has to extend a true worth to regain one's own and that cant come from a wishful or fearful foundation.


To this line in a comment to the article:

“Science has become polluted with emotion and politics.

We will pay a price for it.”

That elicited my reply:

I had an emotional response to this site deleting my longer reply to yours.  But a coercive hidden agenda operates through notions of purity just as through notions of rationality or indeed the wishful and gullible self-seeking for protection. The price of being out of true is lack of peace, grievance, limitation, struggle and suffering one's projections as if they are actually 'out there'. I do feel the 'church' of scientism is in bed with corporate and financial technologism and that it is a racket.


THIS COMMENT was from Rick to the article - not to me

Albert Einstein was a self centered, egotistic man who received credit for a lot of work he never did. In fact, his entire thesis or theory of General Relativity isn't necessary to describe how this universe works, because most of his work is entirely based on the Laws of Thermodynamics, force, and motion, and he never gave credit to Sir Isaac Newton.

My reply is to Rick's comment:

But he has been iconized and is now embedded in a directed 'history' that most everyone presumes to be genuine currency - and once people think they know and like what they think they know - they don't want to know. But not everyone, so thanks for your comment. We are all containing an ego-centric aspect that can often disguise itself in terms of respectability or acceptability. I don't feel to invalidate a human being as if to validate myself - NOT that I see you doing that - but it so often happens that we like to be right about the wrong we see exclusively or predominately in another. As I do not originate myself I cannot have an original thought - but I can extend a willingness for communication that does not mask a hidden agenda - to the best of my current ability. Passing off as something one is not is an expression of ego substitution for a genuine life. But in making mistakes we CAN become aware of poor choices and so come to better ones.

Rick came back to me:

I don't feel a person needs to invalidate another to advance an agenda either. The fact is he was ego-centric and self centered as his relationship with his wife and children clearly shows. In so far as the rest. The fact is Newton's Laws of Thermodynamics are all that is necessary to create and demonstrate exactly how our universal model functions, and also disproves Einstein's theory of General Relativity.

In conversation with Rick:

Societal norms brought out the egotist in many males in many ways. There is a dance between the individual and their conditioning that often fails to transcend it.
I don't know about your assertion on Newton. What's your take on WHY or HOW the establishment embraced and reformed around Einstein's passing off? (If it is clearly not true, what function is it serving?)

Does the subatomic 'Universe' fit the Newtonian model? I think not. If there is a clear benefit, then a perspective has that much validity for the beneficiary at least. However reputation without substance may seem a benefit but actually operates a disintegrity. So true is a matter of self-honesty. Without such foundation - there IS no foundation!

Stink

This article is preparing the population for the legalising of cannabis - perhaps in ways that serve global corporate agenda which usually operates a negative consolidation of power and wealth.

Super strong cannabis responsible for quarter of new psychosis cases
Risk of developing psychosis up to five times greater for those who smoke 'skunk' cannabis every day

If a recreational drug is used as an enhancement rather than a replacement for social or creative activity then it is not being used to serve an agenda of escaping fear in such a direct way (allowing that social activity itself can be used as an escape from unfaced fears).

But when the desire is to 'get completely out of one's head' in a way that peers may reinforce as a positive or self-loving act - then it generally 'wears off' so as to require increasing dosage or potency. And so for those who normalise to such dosage, there seems to be no issue.

However, running away from fear - whether via drugs, workaholism, or any other kind of identity forming conditioning, can ONLY result in reinforcing the fear that the act of running away ITSELF, validates. To be dissonant, wilful, defended and reactive is the state that then is magnified and reflected as one's experience and this spiral either brings one to wake up from self-harm to a self-valuing or to various forms of collapse and dysfunction.

The world as we perceive and communicate it feeds the desire to escape or defend or deny, because in significant sense we are all 'running away from unfaced fear' and this is resulting in waking or collapse and dysfunction.

IF you included alcohol as part of your family and social recreational life, would you want the strongest option to be the one your aspiring children are introduced to. It isn't as simple as that because it is not just the potency. There are particular harmonics of effect to a 'high' and all dope is not the same but simply weaker or stronger.

Generally I believe one is well served to avoid processed foods and substances and to prefer the natural original living plant that has grown with the minimum of adulteration or contamination as a result of agendas that are not about fulfilling service, but manipulating outcomes.

It is unsurprising that a manipulative consciousness attracts manipulators.

Consciousness Itself is a wholeness of being and opening this realisation will naturally release outer dependencies in favour of a 'cup that runneth over'. Joy is our true nature and desire but we have a 'funny way of defining that circa 2015.

Of course, subject to consequences, one is free to do whatever one chooses. There are ALWAYS consequences. Living from a fear-defined sense of self will 'OUT' itself - but the messenger is not the message.

Attacks on the person and displacement of our true living responsibility onto external agencies is the way we ARE tending to define our joy. One might say that something stinks in this - but peer pressure may redefine the stink to be this scapegoat or that scapegoat and indeed war about it so as to be successfully distracted from the stink.

This is just my reflection. Test everything you read for what resonates to your heart's truth. I don't seek to persuade. We are each uncovering our own life - and yet together share it, positively or negatively. Fear denies true choice and so sooner or late one has to choose not to use it to hide in - or from. In one's own timing.

What Is real and what is illusion?

Disappointment expressed:

Denmark’s chief rabbi has this to say about Benjamin Netanyahu


It might appear that Jews are 'operated' by their own 'intelligentsia'. But what do I know about manipulating perception, identity, loyalties and outcomes through the use of fear? Anyone or any group hungry for power over others uses any and every kind of device because they believe such power is the only reality apart from its due worship. Almost everyone uses this capacity to coerce outcome rather than uncover an honourable one for all concerned because in everyone is the capacity to believe their self, or ideology or nation or cause or point of view, is THE TRUE AND RIGHTFUL DOMINION and thus others or other perspectives are invalid.
The way to actually strengthen our own faith is to give the freedom to the other that we desire to enjoy ourself. This insults self-specialness of any kind and thus is less popular and less likely to be newsworthy.
So I feel for the way that is not baited or sucked into hating and invalidating 'other' even when the choice being made is meaningless and destructive to my own discernment of true being. But to reflect of communicate THAT such choices are bing made serves the capacity of all involved to choose rather than be manipulated into what they take to be their 'choice'.
We all take joy and love the freedom to enjoy life - but we each define ourselves and therefore our joy in ways that we are mostly unaware. One of the potential fruits of tragic pain is to a deeper honesty that opens perspective upon what might be called our core self deceptions - that others who study psychology as simply a way to gain power rather than illuminate healing, take advantage of.
If your PC is part of a botnet, becoming aware of it is the call to clear out files or programs that are illegitimate and do not belong - nor serve you - whatever the carrot or stick that might be part of their acceptance or persistence.
Thankyou for your attention.

Beeing Well

A Guardian article on the Bees

Stressed young bees could be cause of colony declines,
scientists find

Bees having to forage younger because older workers have been killed off by disease could be key factor behind colony collapse disorder

I see some sane commenting below. Gratitude.
Bees symbolize joining in common or shared value in service of a wholeness of ... beeing.
Beeing is our nature our first cause from which our thinking and speaking and action proceed.
Stresses of all kinds are resulting from attempting to bee out of sync with our nature - so much so as to usurp it with fear conditioned slave mentality that is ruled by the 1% Beeing 99% blind - who are parasitically compromised by un-owned fear to 'lord it' over Life, even as the 99% are paralysed by unowned fear to demand unconsciousness and resist change.
There are many levels and kind of attack upon our healthy beeing - a broad spectrum collapse in which anything we do tends to feed the problem with yet more ways to kill us.
So yes, there are bio hazards that big money pushes into atmosphere, agriculture, a range of pharmaceuticals, chemicals and materials in common use environmentally, poisons in food supply, and of course More! These are supported by corruptions in corporate, scientific, financial, political, Media and civil endeavour.
Divide and rule operates to use up or open up residual resource to exploitation that essentially turns wealth into an evaporation that fuels the drive to get more and have less.
Beeing is simply shared. Me-ing seeks to possess and control - thus warring against Life and becoming stuck in a toxic investment. Struggles to manage perception take over from addressing issues. Anger, fear and powerlessness erupt in personal focus of blame and bury the issues in incitement to conflict. The death wish of a separate 'me' comes home to roost - because it was our starting point and only clever accounting makes a loss seem like a gain and a promise seem like a carrot in the bank and a stick to protect - but you cannot HAVE what you cannot BE and the stick beats the shit out of anyone who breaks ranks on self-delusion.
I invite gloom and doomers to eat their words and see if in fact they truly belong in circulation. Metamorphosis is in process. Choose the word and thought you live and give currency to - consciously - because the wind is changing and whatever face you are wearing becomes your choice.
The capacity and spontaneity of the Movement of health and renewal is limited by our belief - because we interpret everything to a fearfully self-defined agenda that is founded on belief. One doesn't have to believe anything that does not resonate true for that one - but we are obliged to release our compulsive fixation to assert and defend unrecognized belief that is presumed 'reality'. Scepticism is open to ALL evidence or it is merely cynicism in mask. Bee a gatherer of true flowering - but joyfully - passionately - from a wholeness of belonging. But the only way of letting or allowing such a life is to bee yourself - let the presence of life bee you - and know it true.
It is not gone when we are to busy being agitated to look see.

100% Faith

New Gods: Should we banish faith forever?

Presumed knowledge is blindness to what is actually present.
The terms faith and belief are misused and misidentified.
It is quite so that personal identity professes beliefs or to have faith in what seems reasonably evidenced to their particular perspective. But these are often aspects of a masking identity - for what we actually do, comes from what we actually define and accept ourselves to be in any given moment or situation.
Everyone has 100% faith - but what is it invested in (in any given moment)? One may have faith in 'rational thinking' and presume no faith is involved. But this is the realm of the mask or personae in which assertions of self are justified and defended against the ever changing un-knowability of manifest existence.
The higher mind is out of range to the personality construct - but is natural to one's awareness.
The persona self is a construct and not a thing existing in and of itself.
Identifying exclusively in mask is to be defined and to suffer a coercive and threatening sense of existence. Everyone comes up with their own ways of coping with this - including the supremacist arrogance of a presumed rationality. "Should we banish faith forever?" Is this the New World Order? A joke? or both?
A true science recognizes its foundation in definition - for without self-definition there is NO perspective-experience available. A false science operates as if its predicate is exclusively true.
The "One true God" mistake, is one of exclusive personal definition, and replicates as the one 'empirical truth'. This is a liability of the fight/flight mentality in which the personality has become pervasively identified.
No one has to 'justify' their beliefs in terms of another - but may communicate if approached in a willingness that values communication.
Rationalism divorced from Reason would invalidate anyone who does not conform and use the form of communication as a coercive device. This sort of thing feeds anti rationalism - because meeting a lovelessness in others, is the temptation to project one's own fears and guilts' - one's own feared and hated evil intent - ONTO those who blindly assert power or propagate lovelessness in ways that effectively undermine any other perspective than their own.
This reaction is then equally blind and easily manipulated. Power struggles USE such tactic as a matter of course - hiding within a masked agenda.
Freedom is the inherent capacity to accept into your mind only what is true of you. A conflicted mind is a split persona, and a conflicted world-experience. The evidence belies the foundation. Unless of course one WANTS to keep one's foundation hidden, so as to  interpret all things in its defence.
Belief in separateness - whether apparently religious or apparently atheistic is the same faith. Science can be distorted so as to reinforce this 'faith' as can any spiritual or religious path or culture.
Materialism posits reality without consciousness - or WOULD if it could achieve it. Does not this reveal the hidden agenda of 'rationality' as DENIAL of Consciousness? Is that not THE 'faith' by which the human ego - in any disguise, maintains a semblance of believability and thus its operability in its filtered and distorted version of 'the world'?

Psycho-logical

 

Comment to an article on op-ed news:The Psychological Moment We are In

One can appeal for validation by extending the presumption of 'we' statements, and this is part of the way the self definition works to select and reflect the world that validates it.
The world is consciousness as extended or projected - and reflected. What one is actually projecting ONTO or UPON cannot be experienced without some self-definition relative to it.
Psychology tends to posit its study within a materialistic model of external cause to an internal defence mechanism - of 'self' or ego or even learned (programmed/evolved) behaviours.
So the 'moment we are in relative to the various facets of the currency of self is an interpretation of an already operating interpretation that is tending to be accepted as fact or true when in fact it is assertion or presumption of meanings given priority OVER true that has become largely accepted and unchallenged as the 'human condition'. All that is required to open this is the addition of 'ing' to indicate the nature of the verb that acts within the apparent noun; the human conditioning.
One can use the reflections of experience to illuminate one's own verbing consciousness - that is to uncover the word that comes forth from our own mind by which then a corrupting influence seems to assail us from without.
The 'altered' ego is in a sense the fascination with and subsequent addictive identification within, power OVER.
Within any script are personae to represent all the split off facets of consciousness that operate to support this wish to be a 'someone' in and of your own right - rather than an integral expression of a universally communicative Creation. And it may be becoming apparent that the device for 'splitting' the Indivisible, is terror and guilt believed. Divide and rule is for those who who be as gods OVER Life - and others. But no matter what we dress up in, it does not ACTUALLY divide the Indivisible, but no one can see that who WANTS to protect the 'power' that fear and guilt seem to confer upon their wielder.
There is a Bible sentence that indicates the 'Beast riseth out from the Deep'. The devices of manipulation of consciousness that support the illusion of command and control, are being exposed, and can only operate in the dark. In the obfuscation of communication or of the knowing of a clear self-awareness. And so the attempt or desire for darkness is magnified as the self protective urge to keep a sense of violating power hidden or disguised - not least by pointing anywhere OUTSIDE one Consciousness. There is no outside to Consciousness - but there is a resonance and communication of what I accept and give out as the currency of value - that operates energetically as communication within the totality of Consciousness that is Indivisible yet Infinite in its reflective richness of unique experience.
What one tunes into is one's primary diet from which one automatically shares out. Self-honesty is discernment is a true valuing or indeed a love of truth. To focus ONLY on what is true of you in any given moment is the result of recognizing what is untrue of you, to the point of giving it no further validation.