Monday, 16 February 2015

No Big Bang


One of many articles positing Big Bang may not be demanded by alternate model of Universe:

Big Bang Didn't Happen? New Theory Suggests Universe Has No Beginning, No End




The model is 'all in the mind' - albeit in broad mutual agreement. I am in no doubt that Reality is Mind and that any holographic microcosm of Mind can yield or release its personal identification investment in mutual definitions and know - and I say know - Existence with no shadow of doubt or interference of any kind. But One - any one cannot share or give or communicate any facet OF Existence but through some degree of self definition in relation to the aspect of Existence that is moving as the focus of current desire. However, self-definition is not necessarily exclusive and indeed is free to shift perspective - infinitely. A Universe of Living Information or Communication that extends the Time-less Infinite as Idea is not 'inside anyone's skull'. But materialism diminishes Consciousness almost to want to render it obsolete - excepting as a leverage of technologism that in fact turns out to be directed by a private personal agenda after all. This is evident in cultural, social and political thought and consequent behaviour.

It really is a matter of perspective. But the mind of 'command and control' has science derailed from its desire to uncover truth into a presumed neutral and verifiable determination of truth. But all of it is model which may serve some purposes and hinder others.

The alarm bell for a scientist or seeker of truth in any kind of approach is the symptoms that reveal a biased agenda. When science identifies institutionally it has an ego and can be seen to operate a self protectionism of the establishment. Believing neednt be a weak attempt to hold something true to ward off self doubts. For by belief is experience of had. The key - I feel to offer, is to stand in one's belief as one's presence extending as willingness to relate or communicate as part of an ever new appreciation. The belief is a decision in consciousness that operates more as a navigational pathway or channel of communication than as a shield or sword.

But the core Idea of violence as Creation is deeply embedded into the traumatised collective human consciousness and colours everything until it is observed instead of running a program unnoticed. The Idea of no time or timelessness - from which and in which EVERYTHING that is, is and is known to be in the Mind that it is OF, offers a release from the limiting, splitting, warring, mentality that has characterised the human condition for millennia and yet is a conditionING that can be observed and released for a more joy-aligned choice. This is not anti-science for joy is also our genius or more aptly, a channel through which Life Shares Meaning. Of course one can turn one's back on joy and make sacrifice of consciousness, the 'creation' of a self-sense in its own power, but never free of grievance and vengeance no matter how one used magic and rationality to present otherwise.

So busy looking out because of fear that within is an invalidation of self. Its a kind of scam. But one has to extend a true worth to regain one's own and that cant come from a wishful or fearful foundation.


To this line in a comment to the article:

“Science has become polluted with emotion and politics.
We will pay a price for it.”

That elicited my reply:

I had an emotional response to this site deleting my longer reply to yours.  But a coercive hidden agenda operates through notions of purity just as through notions of rationality or indeed the wishful and gullible self-seeking for protection. The price of being out of true is lack of peace, grievance, limitation, struggle and suffering one's projections as if they are actually 'out there'. I do feel the 'church' of scientism is in bed with corporate and financial technologism and that it is a racket.


THIS COMMENT was from Rick to the article - not to me

Albert Einstein was a self centered, egotistic man who received credit for a lot of work he never did. In fact, his entire thesis or theory of General Relativity isn't necessary to describe how this universe works, because most of his work is entirely based on the Laws of Thermodynamics, force, and motion, and he never gave credit to Sir Isaac Newton.

My reply is to Rick's comment:

But he has been iconized and is now embedded in a directed 'history' that most everyone presumes to be genuine currency - and once people think they know and like what they think they know - they don't want to know. But not everyone, so thanks for your comment. We are all containing an ego-centric aspect that can often disguise itself in terms of respectability or acceptability. I don't feel to invalidate a human being as if to validate myself - NOT that I see you doing that - but it so often happens that we like to be right about the wrong we see exclusively or predominately in another. As I do not originate myself I cannot have an original thought - but I can extend a willingness for communication that does not mask a hidden agenda - to the best of my current ability. Passing off as something one is not is an expression of ego substitution for a genuine life. But in making mistakes we CAN become aware of poor choices and so come to better ones.


Rick came back to me:

I don't feel a person needs to invalidate another to advance an agenda either. The fact is he was ego-centric and self centered as his relationship with his wife and children clearly shows. In so far as the rest. The fact is Newton's Laws of Thermodynamics are all that is necessary to create and demonstrate exactly how our universal model functions, and also disproves Einstein's theory of General Relativity.


In conversation with Rick:

Societal norms brought out the egotist in many males in many ways. There is a dance between the individual and their conditioning that often fails to transcend it.
I don't know about your assertion on Newton. What's your take on WHY or HOW the establishment embraced and reformed around Einstein's passing off? (If it is clearly not true, what function is it serving?)

Does the subatomic 'Universe' fit the Newtonian model? I think not. If there is a clear benefit, then a perspective has that much validity for the beneficiary at least. However reputation without substance may seem a benefit but actually operates a disintegrity. So true is a matter of self-honesty. Without such foundation - there IS no foundation!


Stink

This article is preparing the population for the legalising of cannabis - perhaps in ways that serve global corporate agenda which usually operates a negative consolidation of power and wealth.

Super strong cannabis responsible for quarter of new psychosis cases
Risk of developing psychosis up to five times greater for those who smoke 'skunk' cannabis every day

If a recreational drug is used as an enhancement rather than a replacement for social or creative activity then it is not being used to serve an agenda of escaping fear in such a direct way (allowing that social activity itself can be used as an escape from unfaced fears).

But when the desire is to 'get completely out of one's head' in a way that peers may reinforce as a positive or self-loving act - then it generally 'wears off' so as to require increasing dosage or potency. And so for those who normalise to such dosage, there seems to be no issue.

However, running away from fear - whether via drugs, workaholism, or any other kind of identity forming conditioning, can ONLY result in reinforcing the fear that the act of running away ITSELF, validates. To be dissonant, wilful, defended and reactive is the state that then is magnified and reflected as one's experience and this spiral either brings one to wake up from self-harm to a self-valuing or to various forms of collapse and dysfunction.

The world as we perceive and communicate it feeds the desire to escape or defend or deny, because in significant sense we are all 'running away from unfaced fear' and this is resulting in waking or collapse and dysfunction.

IF you included alcohol as part of your family and social recreational life, would you want the strongest option to be the one your aspiring children are introduced to. It isn't as simple as that because it is not just the potency. There are particular harmonics of effect to a 'high' and all dope is not the same but simply weaker or stronger.

Generally I believe one is well served to avoid processed foods and substances and to prefer the natural original living plant that has grown with the minimum of adulteration or contamination as a result of agendas that are not about fulfilling service, but manipulating outcomes.

It is unsurprising that a manipulative consciousness attracts manipulators.

Consciousness Itself is a wholeness of being and opening this realisation will naturally release outer dependencies in favour of a 'cup that runneth over'. Joy is our true nature and desire but we have a 'funny way of defining that circa 2015.

Of course, subject to consequences, one is free to do whatever one chooses. There are ALWAYS consequences. Living from a fear-defined sense of self will 'OUT' itself - but the messenger is not the message.

Attacks on the person and displacement of our true living responsibility onto external agencies is the way we ARE tending to define our joy. One might say that something stinks in this - but peer pressure may redefine the stink to be this scapegoat or that scapegoat and indeed war about it so as to be successfully distracted from the stink.

This is just my reflection. Test everything you read for what resonates to your heart's truth. I don't seek to persuade. We are each uncovering our own life - and yet together share it, positively or negatively. Fear denies true choice and so sooner or late one has to choose not to use it to hide in - or from. In one's own timing.

What Is real and what is illusion?

Disappointment expressed:

Denmark’s chief rabbi has this to say about Benjamin Netanyahu


It might appear that Jews are 'operated' by their own 'intelligentsia'. But what do I know about manipulating perception, identity, loyalties and outcomes through the use of fear? Anyone or any group hungry for power over others uses any and every kind of device because they believe such power is the only reality apart from its due worship. Almost everyone uses this capacity to coerce outcome rather than uncover an honourable one for all concerned because in everyone is the capacity to believe their self, or ideology or nation or cause or point of view, is THE TRUE AND RIGHTFUL DOMINION and thus others or other perspectives are invalid.
The way to actually strengthen our own faith is to give the freedom to the other that we desire to enjoy ourself. This insults self-specialness of any kind and thus is less popular and less likely to be newsworthy.
So I feel for the way that is not baited or sucked into hating and invalidating 'other' even when the choice being made is meaningless and destructive to my own discernment of true being. But to reflect of communicate THAT such choices are bing made serves the capacity of all involved to choose rather than be manipulated into what they take to be their 'choice'.
We all take joy and love the freedom to enjoy life - but we each define ourselves and therefore our joy in ways that we are mostly unaware. One of the potential fruits of tragic pain is to a deeper honesty that opens perspective upon what might be called our core self deceptions - that others who study psychology as simply a way to gain power rather than illuminate healing, take advantage of.
If your PC is part of a botnet, becoming aware of it is the call to clear out files or programs that are illegitimate and do not belong - nor serve you - whatever the carrot or stick that might be part of their acceptance or persistence.
Thankyou for your attention.

Tuesday, 10 February 2015

Beeing Well


I see some sane commenting below. Gratitude.
Bees symbolize joining in common or shared value in service of a wholeness of ... beeing.
Beeing is our nature our first cause from which our thinking and speaking and action proceed.
Stresses of all kinds are resulting from attempting to bee out of sync with our nature - so much so as to usurp it with fear conditioned slave mentality that is ruled by the 1% Beeing 99% blind - who are parasitically compromised by un-owned fear to 'lord it' over Life, even as the 99% are paralysed by unowned fear to demand unconsciousness and resist change.
There are many levels and kind of attack upon our healthy beeing - a broad spectrum collapse in which anything we do tends to feed the problem with yet more ways to kill us.
So yes, there are bio hazards that big money pushes into atmosphere, agriculture, a range of pharmaceuticals, chemicals and materials in common use environmentally, poisons in food supply, and of course More! These are supported by corruptions in corporate, scientific, financial, political, Media and civil endeavour.
Divide and rule operates to use up or open up residual resource to exploitation that essentially turns wealth into an evaporation that fuels the drive to get more and have less.
Beeing is simply shared. Me-ing seeks to possess and control - thus warring against Life and becoming stuck in a toxic investment. Struggles to manage perception take over from addressing issues. Anger, fear and powerlessness erupt in personal focus of blame and bury the issues in incitement to conflict. The death wish of a separate 'me' comes home to roost - because it was our starting point and only clever accounting makes a loss seem like a gain and a promise seem like a carrot in the bank and a stick to protect - but you cannot HAVE what you cannot BE and the stick beats the shit out of anyone who breaks ranks on self-delusion.
I invite gloom and doomers to eat their words and see if in fact they truly belong in circulation. Metamorphosis is in process. Choose the word and thought you live and give currency to - consciously - because the wind is changing and whatever face you are wearing becomes your choice.
The capacity and spontaneity of the Movement of health and renewal is limited by our belief - because we interpret everything to a fearfully self-defined agenda that is founded on belief. One doesn't have to believe anything that does not resonate true for that one - but we are obliged to release our compulsive fixation to assert and defend unrecognized belief that is presumed 'reality'. Scepticism is open to ALL evidence or it is merely cynicism in mask. Bee a gatherer of true flowering - but joyfully - passionately - from a wholeness of belonging. But the only way of letting or allowing such a life is to bee yourself - let the presence of life bee you - and know it true.
It is not gone when we are to busy being agitated to look see.

Thursday, 5 February 2015

100% Faith


New Gods: Should we banish faith forever?

Presumed knowledge is blindness to what is actually present.
The terms faith and belief are misused and misidentified.
It is quite so that personal identity professes beliefs or to have faith in what seems reasonably evidenced to their particular perspective. But these are often aspects of a masking identity - for what we actually do, comes from what we actually define and accept ourselves to be in any given moment or situation.
Everyone has 100% faith - but what is it invested in (in any given moment)? One may have faith in 'rational thinking' and presume no faith is involved. But this is the realm of the mask or personae in which assertions of self are justified and defended against the ever changing un-knowability of manifest existence.
The higher mind is out of range to the personality construct - but is natural to one's awareness.
The persona self is a construct and not a thing existing in and of itself.
Identifying exclusively in mask is to be defined and to suffer a coercive and threatening sense of existence. Everyone comes up with their own ways of coping with this - including the supremacist arrogance of a presumed rationality. "Should we banish faith forever?" Is this the New World Order? A joke? or both?
A true science recognizes its foundation in definition - for without self-definition there is NO perspective-experience available. A false science operates as if its predicate is exclusively true.
The "One true God" mistake, is one of exclusive personal definition, and replicates as the one 'empirical truth'. This is a liability of the fight/flight mentality in which the personality has become pervasively identified.
No one has to 'justify' their beliefs in terms of another - but may communicate if approached in a willingness that values communication.
Rationalism divorced from Reason would invalidate anyone who does not conform and use the form of communication as a coercive device. This sort of thing feeds anti rationalism - because meeting a lovelessness in others, is the temptation to project one's own fears and guilts' - one's own feared and hated evil intent - ONTO those who blindly assert power or propagate lovelessness in ways that effectively undermine any other perspective than their own.
This reaction is then equally blind and easily manipulated. Power struggles USE such tactic as a matter of course - hiding within a masked agenda.
Freedom is the inherent capacity to accept into your mind only what is true of you. A conflicted mind is a split persona, and a conflicted world-experience. The evidence belies the foundation. Unless of course one WANTS to keep one's foundation hidden, so as to  interpret all things in its defence.
Belief in separateness - whether apparently religious or apparently atheistic is the same faith. Science can be distorted so as to reinforce this 'faith' as can any spiritual or religious path or culture.
Materialism posits reality without consciousness - or WOULD if it could achieve it. Does not this reveal the hidden agenda of 'rationality' as DENIAL of Consciousness? Is that not THE 'faith' by which the human ego - in any disguise, maintains a semblance of believability and thus its operability in its filtered and distorted version of 'the world'?

Sunday, 1 February 2015

Psycho-logical


 

Comment to an article on op-ed news:The Psychological Moment We are In


One can appeal for validation by extending the presumption of 'we' statements, and this is part of the way the self definition works to select and reflect the world that validates it.
The world is consciousness as extended or projected - and reflected. What one is actually projecting ONTO or UPON cannot be experienced without some self-definition relative to it.
Psychology tends to posit its study within a materialistic model of external cause to an internal defence mechanism - of 'self' or ego or even learned (programmed/evolved) behaviours.
So the 'moment we are in relative to the various facets of the currency of self is an interpretation of an already operating interpretation that is tending to be accepted as fact or true when in fact it is assertion or presumption of meanings given priority OVER true that has become largely accepted and unchallenged as the 'human condition'. All that is required to open this is the addition of 'ing' to indicate the nature of the verb that acts within the apparent noun; the human conditioning.
One can use the reflections of experience to illuminate one's own verbing consciousness - that is to uncover the word that comes forth from our own mind by which then a corrupting influence seems to assail us from without.
The 'altered' ego is in a sense the fascination with and subsequent addictive identification within, power OVER.
Within any script are personae to represent all the split off facets of consciousness that operate to support this wish to be a 'someone' in and of your own right - rather than an integral expression of a universally communicative Creation. And it may be becoming apparent that the device for 'splitting' the Indivisible, is terror and guilt believed. Divide and rule is for those who who be as gods OVER Life - and others. But no matter what we dress up in, it does not ACTUALLY divide the Indivisible, but no one can see that who WANTS to protect the 'power' that fear and guilt seem to confer upon their wielder.
There is a Bible sentence that indicates the 'Beast riseth out from the Deep'. The devices of manipulation of consciousness that support the illusion of command and control, are being exposed, and can only operate in the dark. In the obfuscation of communication or of the knowing of a clear self-awareness. And so the attempt or desire for darkness is magnified as the self protective urge to keep a sense of violating power hidden or disguised - not least by pointing anywhere OUTSIDE one Consciousness. There is no outside to Consciousness - but there is a resonance and communication of what I accept and give out as the currency of value - that operates energetically as communication within the totality of Consciousness that is Indivisible yet Infinite in its reflective richness of unique experience.
What one tunes into is one's primary diet from which one automatically shares out. Self-honesty is discernment is a true valuing or indeed a love of truth. To focus ONLY on what is true of you in any given moment is the result of recognizing what is untrue of you, to the point of giving it no further validation.

Friday, 30 January 2015

Embodying the Transcendental in Art


The Mystery of Music: Explaining the transcendental

To the above thinking:

Why not "both/AND"? (instead of either/or)
The nature of structures or patterns can be 'explained' or illuminated by mathematical or geometrical patterns and ratios. These in turn may correlate with patterns in consciousness and nature.
But the aesthetic appreciation and intuitive stirring of the Soul is creative act whose meaning expresses through the perceiver and embodies and reflects a Living quality that transcends any definition.
To call it anything is to attempt to 'translate it into form' and music is already bringing it into form whereas attempts to map out in models tends to serve a manipulative control that by nature is blind to wholeness - which is transcendent to the sum of its parts.
However, to BE a 'mystery' is not mysterious - but simply a direct abiding appreciation as. The sense of mystery to the mind of mapping is really just an inappropriate application of a tool. You do not require explanation to be all that you are.
However, story can use the idea of 'mystery' to indicate a special or superior state or power to which the listener is framed as in a process of attaining or becoming and this may have expediency to the role of parent or guide but becomes a manipulative exclusion of innate nature when such role becomes self-serving status.
The framing of any appreciation of music or sound patterning expression is a definitional structure of personal and cultural filters and conditionings in a unique moment or context.
The idea of taking something out of context and analyzing it, is not a musical communication so much as a focus on forms.
The reduction Living Reality to form-based meanings is the assertion of a separate mind context in which to exclude the wholeness appreciation in favour of a private agenda which can  of course find mutual reinforcement. This communicates a different foundational vibratory quality than a direct inspirational sharing. Art and artifice reflect different qualities BUT the meaning that anything has is truly the meaning one gives it. Hence there is not a unified FORM of music but there is a unified experience of joy that can be embodied musically.
Beneath the sophisticate definitions is our primitive nature of 'being moved' by the unseen and invoking or embodying it.

Synchronicity relections


Written in comment to Rethinking Synchronicity - You Have the Amazing Ability to Create Coincidence



Every Instant is a synchronicity, and memory operates within or as a facet of the mind of comparison between this and that, or that and now - even though it is summoned up as a construct within the now.
There is no way to account for synchronicity within a linear time-frame terms, but there is a way to account for linear time-frame experience within synchronicity. It has been noted that the brain and its corresponding mind of the personality construct, operates as a limiting and filtering device within Always, Infinity, Indivisibility. The alignment of the personality construct with the Field Awareness reflects as synchronicity - but if the ego is not integrated, this can be fearfully interpreted and indeed denied.
Rather than presume a disconnected consciousness and seek to validate it and all things in its image, consider reversing the reversal.



A HOPI ELDER SPEAKS


~=~ -:- ~=~ -:- ~>>-<<~>>~+~<<~>>-<<~ -:- ~=~ -:- ~=~

"You have been telling the people that this is the Eleventh Hour, now you must go back and tell the people that this is THE HOUR.

And there are things to be considered...

Where are you living?

What are you doing?

What are your relationships?

Are you in right relation?

Where is your water?

Know your garden.

It is time to speak your Truth.

Create your community.

Be good to each other.

And do not look outside yourself for the leader.

Then he clasped his hands together, smiled, and said, "This could be a good time! There is a river flowing now very fast. It is so great and swift that there are those who will be afraid. They will try to hold on to the shore. They will feel they are being torn apart and will suffer greatly. Know the river has its destination. The elders say we must let go of the shore, push off into the middle of the river, keep our eyes open, and our heads above the water. And I say, see who is in there with you and celebrate.

At this time in history, we are to take nothing personally. Least of all, ourselves. For the moment that we do, our spiritual growth and journey comes to a halt.

The time of the lone wolf is over. Gather yourselves! Banish the word struggle from your attitude and your vocabulary. All that we do now must be done in a sacred manner and in celebration.

We are the ones we've been waiting for.

Oraibi, Arizona Hopi Nation

 http://www.lawoftime.org/hopi-elders-statement.html

Climate guilt ridden fear as a weapon

Climate Destabilization - as an instrument of strategic pressure

This voice may be a canary in the mine. I did not engage his political points but felt to illuminate a perspective of discernment to the conversation as to the nature of the communications that propagate fearful agenda.

- - -


I trust and use discernment as to the quality of any communication that I meet in terms of its coercive payload or its extension of value. The former may attempt to disguise itself in the latter but to be fooled one has to take the bait.

However in our society - almost everyone is in a sense preloaded or already conditioned with fear, guilt and a sense of self dissonance - which is to a large extent displaced onto one's world - that is onto others and conditions to which one feels subject.

The archetypal instrument of human guilt as basis of destruction is the engine of the divide and rule or 'splitting' the mind against itself in psychological defence.

Another instrument whereby to maintain ignorance that always enacts arrogance is to presume to know or be certain. It is quite possible to live from certainty - but a true certainty is at peace and at rest within itself - that is - it is not asserting itself in order to convince, overcome, undermine of GET anything from anyone. This certainty operates as wholeheartedness and directness or honesty. A false certainty is driven by a fearful or conflicted agenda that seeks reinforcement and is attempt to gain or maintain power OVER that inner conflict - whilst manifesting as the operation of coercive power in the world.

Climate change is a great opportunity - in fact an unmissable one! But a fearfully defined self interest will always frame everything to serve its own agenda.
Primate change - is also the opportunity to recognize a psychologically fear based sense of self and existence and discern what is true or untrue of who you know yourself to be.
And although the mind's defences are designed to obscure that, they can only do so via the deceits of fear and guilt in personally coercive terms.

Science is a wonderful tool, but scientism is wedded to a corporate agenda and its own rigid model that represents a defence against truth that the mind is not ready to accept - for if we were, then there would not be the patterns and roles of being caged or kept in the dark.

Logic is rational - but can extend insane foundations to arrive at rational absurdity.
Power-seeking interests work by stealth and guile to disintegrate so as to enter and control.
Integrity is thus the beginning and the end of the matter for any sane creative endeavour.

Scarcity in the perception of power

A Summary (in quotes) of the first Media Lens book, 'Guardians of Power'

led me to write what I feel joins with the theme - but from an appreciation upon the structure of consciousness that runs beneath the world.

- - -

I've read and appreciated reading this but feel to note the political effect is one with the consciousness cause.

The idea of a dark lens of distortion is not new and the idea of a deceiving mentality is not new - but what is less often acknowledged is that its defence against exposure, and subsequent disregard, is the device of denial and projection - for these two are one. What is denied, hated, or rejected in one's own consciousness is made real or validated as a negatively charged fear, by the projection away from self - onto world or other - and then reacted to as true - in the seeking of mutual reinforcement and agreement.

This device purports to temporarily protect from intolerable guilt and the 'rational' mind is invoked to justify and support such division as if an actual separation.

The 'lie and the father of the lie', is the force of the wish to defend a fearfuly defined sense of self as if it is true. This inevitably operates at expense of truth and in disregard to others or one's own true interests. It is the mind of war to which truth is sacrificed.

In the identifying of the 'liar' within Consciousness - of which one's true being is an expression, one becomes free of the personality assertions that sidetrack and displace - or mask and hide  - the actual issues from exposure - and thus protect from resolution.

Rather than seek moral righteousness in opposing the wrong, we can embody an integrity or congruency of being that is able to communicate itself and address the issues without being baited or lured into the crab barrel of futility.

A current ML article uses the term 'rewilding'. I remind those open to symbolic wisdom that God's response to the Paradise Pair who thought to be masked and self-empowered by their own thinking, was "And who told you you were naked?".

Who tells us we are shameful, blameful, inadequate to our life, unworthy of love, etc etc?
The liar does. Whether apparently externally or apparently internally.

Jesus said - (and I don't use him here as an 'external authority' to hide in), that it is what comes out of a mouth that defiles it and not what goes in. Just let 'mouth' stand for mind and see that whatever we are exposed to, it is up to us what we accept, share on and thus identify and belief true for us. For if we give our focus of energy and attention, we are choosing it - even if we do so in 'secret' or by the device of a  'compartmentalized' division in place of knowing and sharing wholeness.

Fear frames all choice within its own founding dictate and so operates as a tyrannous will, masked in the illusion of freedom. But fear itself is a choice, and to recognize that fact, is to resume the use of a power we have never really 'given away' - but covered over in the belief we got rid of it. Why? Because one can use the idea of power to hurt oneself in such a way as to then seek to limit loss and protect a fragment. The mind is then split in the search to regain its power/love/identity through the very relations that it has projected its own rejection upon.

The diversion into fear operates as a reversal within consciousness  where the effect is put before the cause - and becomes believed to exist apart from and thus becomes (in its own belief) its own cause.

In truth such false identity attacks and undermines its own power source for its seeming 'power' comes from denial of true. That is, it has all the power you give it in the belief it is you - or your protector and guide.

While in principle this is simple, the investment in fear is deeply layered with defences such that communication access is effectively denied. Not unlike addiction.
However, the true nature of Consciousness IS Communication and so there is a perspective available in which to recognize or waken from the mistaken identity, and we can seek and find and extend the conditions in which such communication is freely accepted.

Fear of AI - artificial intelligence

How scared are you of AI? asks The Guardian.


I find our technology amusing in that it replicates an already artificial intelligence.
First of all, what is Intelligence - or for the purposes of comparison; native intelligence?
The native intelligence is that which an artificial intelligence denies and usurps.
The native intelligence functions as a quality of communication within and of a wholeness of being.
An artifice operates as a distorting filter upon the communication flow, so as to operate a program of mapping, prediction and control, as a function of reinforcement and defence for the persistence of control as the foundation of a sense of separated intelligence.
This machine is apparent capacity of a mind to operate independently or autonomously. Not in Fact - but in experience.
The artificial intelligence is a device to access experience of power and will within a three dimensional 'external reality'.
However, its own definition of intelligence is predicated upon the power by which it seems to have come into existence; divide and rule.
Intelligence in the native or true sense, is indivisible, being the result of ask and receive, of knock and answer, that is innate or inherent to wholeness.
Where self-doubt has not entered, this can be readily demonstrated.
But a split off partiality from the separation-trauma is both self-assertion and self-doubt seeking to unify itself against what it projects away as rejected or not self. Within its programmed framing is only a game of powers meeting depletion and defeat - for attempt to disconnect from Source can only generate destructively, but in ways that seem to be wealth and power - that evaporates to debt and slavery and defiance.
Accessing Consciousness is a matter of releasing or desisting the artificial identity in reaction, so as to be receptive to Universal Will - which then resumes true will as integral to its wholeness in the awareness of the individual expression.
The split mind characterizes the 'human conditioning' or program over the last few millennia. But a reintegration of alignment to true function re-purposes abilities of the artificial personality complex to serve rather than usurp, the core function OF Consciousness - which is Creative.
The extension of whole consciousness into what we currently regard as machines of material insentience, is a living relational extension of Life rather than a mis-identified attempt to power over Life.
The safety of something is in its foundation. Anything of a self-conflicted foundation cannot result in a peaceful outcome. Change the foundation - or rather, release the false, and 'technologies' become ONLY used for communication and service.
The idea that humans are pests or parasites is an idea of a false self-reflection. Change your core self-belief and extend and receive a different world. We populate our world with self-hate because we don't own the conflict of our fears and therefore are programmed by them - and this reflects as 'evil power'.
All coercive power operates the same agenda - regardless of the form it takes. It is a product of wanting generated by lack and fuelled by persistent interference in its own channel of Intelligence that uses Light to make darkness as proof of its own existence. It does so by hiding or disguising awareness in mutually asserted and agreed definition. Everything reflects the Idea you give it. A matter-world of disconnected blind processes in which to 'lord it' over the subjugated? There is no peace in it, means it is delusional. An addictive negative loop. Programming failure. Reboot core services.

Monday, 26 January 2015

Addiction affliction

HuffPo has an article on addiction - and I felt to add my perspective to the underlying psychology of addiction.


Disconnection - FELT- disconnection from Life - from love, from wholeness - MUST seek itself everywhere at all times.

The core identity issue is that when our own mind is believed to be the cause of disconnected or loveless experience, then the pattern the results is a conflicted or split minded fear and guilt that then seeks protection FROM itself by looking ANYWHERE BUT where the pain and fear of invalidating hate and anger is, and thus displace itself in looking OUT and seeking answer OUTSIDE - away from where the problem is.

So a misaligned or untrue sense of self cuts off awareness of true, believes it is victim to events it cannot tolerate or control, and attempts to tolerate and control them as a split off mind by projecting them onto the Life of the world and onto others.
Substitutes for love that cost true connection, a personal sense of power that seeks its own while blind to the true relationship of Life-connection.
Addiction first begins with the compulsion to THINK as a persona-mask or shield of limitation and protection FROM a sense of vulnerability in fear of exposure as an unworthiness of living love. Of being seen or known truly or of extending true presence.

This view of addiction is revealing the device or template for the particular version of segregative and separated consciousness that seeks control over life individually and collectively and has culminated in the world that in a sense we have made that REFLECTS the addictive disconnect from Life - as a self-destructive blindness.

But the birthing into the physical experience does not HAVE to be templated as the disconnect of a fearfully or unworthily defined self. It is not hard-wired to our consciousness though it has been conditioned over millennia.
The addict in denial has generated its own version or definitions of everything in what to that perspective seem self-protective. These are what we call our psychological defences. But they are protecting the FEAR and the BELIEF in GUILT as if these were the FOUNDATION without which all would be a negative intolerable chaos.
BUT to actually LOOK upon this seeming foundation in clear awareness is to SEE that it s not YOU.
Opening a conscious communication in ones awareness of a true FOUNDATION in Life rather than ones own THINKING, initiates and supports and guides a life of reintegration that shifts to align and act out from a true foundation - a truly FELT foundation.
The re-integrative sense of self is one of an unfolding and shared existence whose meaning is in felt existence itself as the movement of sharing, of desire, of embrace or passion, in true desire.
For to truly live is to be truly you, right here, as this now. The now of the addict is sacrificed t GET away from what is defined as disconnect and invalid and thus disregarded except as a means to get somewhere else. There is no appreciation of the harmonies and qualities of all things as the richness of living excepting in conditions that are defined love - conditions in which one allows or permits relaxation into feeling connected. But even this is pervaded with attendant fears of change, of loss, of running out, of separation-fears. And often the association of being 'hurt by love' will prevent any real relaxation but restrict experience to the superficial and shifting, as if to be safe from feeling connected because it EXPECTS and associates that with PAIN.

The 'world' that results from persisting in an untrue and split off sense of self is insane, self destructive and tragic in its denials and deceits. But it is not HAPPENNING to you, it is a subscription service. One doesn't change an insane world by seeking to solve it OUT THERE, one pauses from insane entanglement to notice and OWN that insanity is operating as an out of true or fearfully defined sense of self. NOT using it to FIX yourself opens the perspective UPON it in which YOU can recognize inherited or conditioned CHOICES that operate against your true desire and so your DO NOT WANT THEM and allow your free imaginative natural being to uncover and move with a better choice.
This is not a blame or shame or negatively charged denial of the previous choice.
The attempt to control and coerce upon one's Life is the thinking that sets up the disconnect from the light of relational awareness - the Field Awareness - in which one feels and navigates within and as an integral aspect of a wholeness.
True thinking is in the Heart. Not emotionally masked agenda, but the communication that resonates and is relevant to what you know and feel to be true of you to the best of your ability in any given moment. The machine mind does NOT know or love you who are Life, but runs as a misplaced protection that CANNOT protect you and which overburdens itself in the attempt to manage what it is neither designed or capable of achieving. In releasing usurped functions to a felt connected Life, true function is restored. Healing is what happens naturally when true relation, communication and recognition are accepted. Love's response is to love's extension. Coercion is not the way. Willingness and self-honesty to joy are the way.
Thankyou for your attention.


Vicky McDonald commented to the article:
Having a sibling spiral out of control on drugs when he was a teenager and then dying from the same at 49 years old, I saw and knew to early in my life how drugs/alcohol ravage human beings. We tried everything to help him, loving him unconditionally, tough love, therapists, baker act, but mostly never, ever turning our backs on him and always telling him how much we loved him, but nothing ever worked, he used and drank himself to death, I do not feel their is one reason, genetically, physically, emotionally why users use... to me it is a human mystery that will remain unsolved for as long as life exists on this planet.
(I couldn't get this comment to post but here it is anyway)

No matter what anyone does, the power to choose is inviolate. In any situation one chooses the best or least worst option as one defines oneself in that situation or relationship.

The key word is defines. How does one define anything but as a sense of giving and receiving meaning. But we do not recognize this power is operating, but take for granted, and live out within, mutually agreed definitions, that are not necessarily true of us or agreed with by others.

The 'mystery' of free will is that it does not make sense to the need to make sense of everything in our own terms. But what cannot BE understood, then holds our mind open OR is used to lock them shut. I lost a daughter to suicide - or I have had the blessing of a beloved daughter who suddenly and inexplicably left. The mind can spin on everywhich way it can but it only goes round in circles.

My second daughter is 'special needs' and without guile of mental complexity and spoke sanity into our family when she said "we did not want Ellie to die, but she did".

We each have a deep sense of what we deeply WANT that may be deeply buried and treasured,  but we know when we feel deprived of it. Living a life in which one feels denied of core sense of unmet need may be unbearable. But amidst the unbearable is the opportunity to become aware of self-definitions that form our personality structure - or who we believe - and in that sense love - ourselves to be. There are so many ways in which I deny myself happiness by insisting it must come a certain way. Is it true to say we are all addicted to our 'self' until we wake from a perspective beyond it?