Global Warring ; Primate Change?

'Global warming not progressing as fast as depicted in worst-case models'

A new study shows natural variability in surface temperatures can account for observed changes in the recent rates of warming from decade to decade.

- - -


The idea of Science is a freedom from distortions of coercive agenda in uncovering an ever clearer current account of what is, relative to where we believe and experience ourself to be.

The idea of a coercive agenda is to want what is to be different than it is, to such degree that the model is used as a lens or filtering framework of misinterpretation.

The ego or sense of self of such a model thus reinforces or defends itself against any fundamental change as the basic psychology of defence against threat.

This allies itself with anything that funds or supports its premise, and forgets or neglects the original scientific enquiry.

A limited and blinkered self-righteousness is thus manipulated as technologism and scientism propaganda for agendas of which few are aware because it is hidden in a blindspot of presumed, believed and WANTED true.

The underlying racket cultivates human self-specialness in order to capture and then induces scarcity in which guilt and fear allow the blatant manipulation of populations. Truly, we do this collectively unto ourselves, wherever we may seem to be on the 'pyramid of power'.

Testing the 'spirits' is discerning the psychology at work. That climate is changing is not in question. The immediate reaction of guilt - as a result of knowingly being out of accord with our nature and our environment - generates a fear driven agenda, and where Chicken Licken screams, Foxy Loxy is sure to turn up.

Re-aligning with our true nature is the restoration of an unconflicted capacity to relate to ourself and others; absent coercion.
Re-aligning science to its true function can raise the dissected corpse of an ignorant and arrogant materialism from the dead.

Planetary climate change is here - with and without what we are doing knowingly and somewhat under guise of obfuscation or 'clever' accounting - and black ops or rogue agenda that include any kind of weather manipulating technology as well as psyops of deceit, disinformation and staged events.

If one believes truth = dominance at all costs, then everything else is subsumed to that belief, for whom the only sin or crime is losing. Once the other is redefined as collateral damage or worthless - there is no relationship; only coercive manipulation.

However raw coercion commands no allegiance excepting the pursuit of tyranny and so the mask must be played out as part of winning the war-game. Without the mask, there is no war. Only relationships of creative challenge and conscious endeavour.

The propagating of dissension in 'either/or' generates polarised extremism at cost of discarding willingness and functionality of relationship and communication. For this is the condition in which the false can not maintain its illusion of credibility.

This calls for pausing of self-righteous reaction and allows observing the nature of our reaction and what is driving it. Personal identity either serves or obstructs our true self, and conflict is the diversionary distraction by which to not recognize what is in fact going on.

The magical identity hides hate

The article: The Magical Illusion of a Christian America
raises ideas of religious identity or indeed anti religious identity. I felt to comment thus:

- - -
Definitions SEEM to bring a sense of identity in stability and thus an illusion of control along with an inherent bias of self-specialness that makes them rigidly defended against change rather than fluidly part of an unfolding conscious appreciation of that which identifies Life, Self and Meaning as an ever fresh recognition and extension of value.

Definitions are part of the current experience of the human consciousness but are generally not recognized as human conditioning except by those who would mask a private agenda behind the appearance that has become accepted in place of the tangible presence of value.

'Christian' thus comes to mean whatever anyone decides it means to them in absence of any demonstration of Christ love extended in recognition.
In other words, the mind redefines all things unto its own image and then seeks to prevail, that is, to make its version 'true' by invalidation or denying threat to its 'identity', that is held sacrosanct and not open to question or revision excepting it will 'evolve' in terms of adapting and surviving - including dropping significant aspects of the identity to change the form of the mask.

Personal identity is defence within a presumption of threat and hostility. It may join with others in mutual agreements that make a relative peace but always as a group that defends itself likewise.

Everything remains open for Humanity to accept and embrace its true and abundant inheritance BUT for the assertion of personal will upon a true or honest communication - for Life Is Communication - not merely information but the relational dance of meanings discovered, embraced and shared.

The Jesus story and its teaching are exactly illuminating this facet of the human conditioning, but instead of accepting the message, the messenger was made special, separate, and no longer an example in which to recognize our own Life. If anything it generally became subverted to the old religion of guilt and sacrifice of joy for this has been the way of the world.

A lie seeks whatever works to justify itself and thus adulterates the currency of exchange with division and coercive reaction. It may not believe itself a liar, but if asserting certainty as a way of denying self-doubt, the truth is not being communicated because it is feared.
More than that, what is being communicated is actively working to protect against such fear being brought to awareness and to prevent exposure of whatever tricks are being employed to obfuscate, or sow dissension or diversion from critical points.

The personal identity is in a sense a fig-leaf lie that finds mutually agreed currency and reinforcement by conflict and reaction as much as by agreement.
Who are we beneath our mask? We are that which can truly know and be known. We are the freedom to persist in mask or be open to communication. But within the mask we believe that what is behind the mask is fearful and unacceptable. Until we look within and uncover our true humanity - which we do not manufacture or distort except by taking image and worshipping it.
Kindness is of a kind. Self-specialness is inherent un-kindred. There is a core psychology that can be noticed regardless of the cultural packaging, and identifying this psychology within our own conscious responsibility is waking from the spell of reactive defence to a truly grounded presence - that will then express itself in every kind of cultural or innovative way - but as a willingness of extending an honest presence in which to recognize the other as ourself instead of wanting otherness to be the dumping ground of our unowned and unhealed hatred.
I've gone into a particular direction in this comment, but the illusion of a mask is already magic. Seeing the illusion is breaking the spell. Not to attack the mask or the choice to use it - but to open up a channel of communication where before there was none.
- - -

The following comment to the main article:

I wish I could agree with the conclusion. We've got quite a way to go to become a nation of tolerance. Sadly.

My reply:

The idea of tolerance is brought into being by intolerance. Likewise patience is called on amidst impatience.
But a genuine willingness to relate, to listen and communicate does not start of from predjudice or fear of loss, and then seek to keep face, and so it does not think or define itself 'tolerant' but simply engaged in living relational being.
The attempt to build a world of love within hatred can never ever succeed.
One has to acknowledge the hatred and the fears and wounds beneath to release it.
So I might regard myself as intolerant of tolerance and intolerance - but actually I just don't see through that framework.
It is the fear of hatred and the fear of fear that gives power to them - and those who seek worldly power know this well and use it to get your vote of fear and hatred instead of a discerning presence within they cannot hide the hate and fear that drives their agenda. Now who does not seek worldly power, being free of all hate and fear, throw the first stone...

Strangers at the Dinner Table

Immigration at the Dinner Table

(Daily Bell article)

- - -

The framework or agenda within which something operates is what it in effect is - whereas when it seems to be something 'known' a hidden agenda hides within that believed 'known' and effects the usurpation of the mind.

Shifting from a personally polarised dissension of reaction that currently accepted frameworks embody to be curious as to what is in effect revealing its cause, is 'looking within' as an integrative context to 'looking out' at the world. (Which is to release the reactive personal identity in yielding to a genuine willingness and curiosity).

We know by now that sowing dissension is the modus operandi of tyranny by deceit, and so dissension itself is a symptom of corrupted or adulterated definitions. Manipulating perception operates by substituting a falsehood or partiality for true. Once one loses a true grounding, the fall can be orchestrated by the efforts of one's own attempt to defend a false identity.

Ideas accepted and acted out have inevitable or logical consequences, which then become the 'market' to plunder, that the idea of plunder starts out from.

Everyone can be seen to be acting in accord with their world as they each and in each moment believe and thus experience it to be. The personalisation of difference as a reactive reinforcement of identity diverts from uncovering one's own predicates or foundation.

An identity in reaction is no true foundation at all and yet seems so very obviously fact when enough agree it true.

There are many many instances of history where confusions and cultural schism of wars and migrations due to calamity have effected co-fusions or blended shifts of cultural adjustments. Social engineering attempts this model manually - as everything of the disconnected ego sense attempts to manually replicate and replace what it otherwise has no authority patent or control over.

War on Life is aka asserting a lie in the face of true. The obvious rationality for this is fear. Fear is not a true foundation from which to live.

Engineering self extinction

FDA Pushing To Regulate Homeopathy Out of Existence?

An article on Green Med Info

My comment:

Asserted ' scientific truths' used as weapons by a sickness racket pretending to serve health.

The politics of sickness as a vector of control extends globally through every aspect of our biology of body-mind and environment. It does this through corrupting cells and capturing regulatory systems and natural defensive capabilities to operate AGAINST its host.

When an idea runs rogue in the body politic, it seeks out and kills all that might threaten its survival. Thus the fraud is often the loudest voice shouting quackery! Or the gullible are set up and triggered into enacting an agenda by which they believe themself superior, special, advanced in their career or remuneration or protected from otherwise adverse events or conditions.

Those who have no eyes to see, will not see. War or willingness is a choice. But war dictates and frames choices only to perpetuate its agenda. Truth is sacrificed to the 'god' of war.

Militant 'believers' in science are not practitioners of a willingness and curiosity to uncover truth. The model has become a power base by which to predate upon and exploit, that operates a much more pervasive tyranny of "church and state" than the Vatican ever could. But the real tyranny is within our own thinking. What is projected and reflected as a sickness of humanity upon ourselves and our world is the result of a kind of false parasitic thinking, in which fear subverts and replaces integrity with 'war thinking' - with an identity founded upon and embodying conflict.

International 'trade' agreements such as TTIP are being set up globally to subordinate sovereignty not only of national governments relative to corporate agenda, but of our biology to the likes of Monsanto. There is no way to see this being enacted in our midst while sucking on the worldview of a manufactured and managed identity. Apparently protected from its deeper fears but actually  being manipulated through them.

Therefore the correcting response is to uncover and face our fears so as to no longer be suckered into coercive and manipulative deceits posing as saviours.

"Yes it works in practice - but does it work in theory?" !

Empiric medicine was engineered out of the medical profession by Rockefeller Carnegie money and malice working through the funding and setting up of teaching facilities.

Oh look up something like prozac fraud if you really think the wolves are not wearing scientist's clothing. "Unreason' is within the distorted thinking of the corrupted establishment - not out there in conspiracy nuts and quackery.

" It cures. So what! Is it patentable? Now you are talking.... Multiple side effects? - a revenue stream. Peer reviews and FDA approval?  - We have established a network of trusted individuals in all the right places. Media? - Yes we can set the narrative. Opposition? - People don't really know what they want. We can help them recognize their true interests via any number of proven strategies. We own the opposition. Lies? - There are no lies in war and war is the name of the game in which losing is the only sin. Truth? Its what you make it, son - now listen to me...."

The New Militarism: Who Profits?

The New Militarism: Who Profits? By Ron Paul 
A Daily Bell editorial
- - -

My comment:
Money isn't the motive excepting it serves an agenda of gaining and consolidating power. Strategic 'profits' also come into the balance sheet.

Who profits from inflaming and fuelling conflict? Proxy puppeteers who are themselves hollow?

Our real choice is the embodying of who we truly are. Wars operate to block and distract such awareness, hollowing out true wealth and substance and replacing with debt-driven identity founded, conditioned and managed by reaction.

Ideas operate invisibly until revealed in a fresh perspective - as if money itself is wealth. Ideas become currency by sharing them. Manipulators attempt to coerce ideas which always and can only 'come back with interest' in its own timing. I appreciate what I know of Ron Paul's willingness to communicate what other players are scripted to hide.

If our self and world definition gives rise to a system of idea by which a few enslave the many while destroying the whole, then there is a natural call to re-evaluate everything we believe true and test it within a deeper honesty than we may at first be willing to open to.

Coercive power acting as if to overcome coercive power simply consolidates and densifies identity defined in powerlessness - for only the fear of powerlessness drives the lust to power and generates and adapts a personality that ONLY operates within war.

The few embody for all a role in the picture of a consciousness ruled by fear - and generally by shadow fear that is not at first apparent, and last to be recognized in one's own thought system - for the personality is designed to mask it.

A mask of presentation is not true substance; but a manipulation. Presence extends or embodies a genuine willingness of communication that the mask cannot see - but can catch up with when the effects show up on the radar and then absorb or subvert the forms that it can see. Everything can be mimicked but how to tell the real deal? "It takes one to know one".

To study the arts of the 'enemy' is to invite a trojan horse into one's heart and mind. The 'enemy' is a shifting changing idea of the hated and feared - or the scapegoat for such guilt. We export hate in 'self righteous' deceit and then import the pain that wounds and fuels the hate. Until of course, we recognize what we are subscribing to or participating in and choose to face and move through our fears rather than be ruled by them in shadow puppetry of thinly veiled hatred stripped of any residual appeal to legitimacy.

Perhaps the last shred of justifiction is in reaction to being attacked as evil, for the mind is a cherry picker and will see the error in another or goad and bait to bring it out and 'see' the evil in the other. That's its job until it is aligned to serve truth rather than determine it - and make a self out of warring over it.

The New Militarism: Who Profits?

By Ron Paul

Graded or degraded?

Smoking cannabis WILL affect students' grades, says new report
- particularly if you are studying maths

A curious initial discovery for many who experience the shifted perception afforded by a somewhat forced biological drug effect, is of breaking the spell of a mask by which their perception had been itself confined and conformed to a coercive and fear driven agenda.

But without a true grounding of self honesty and relationship that embody such honesty, the apparent freedom of perception merely becomes conformed to a subtler version of the masked agenda that is essentially an expression OF a fearful self definition.

Targets and "incentives" and blame culture do not make society function harmoniously - but the reverse! Look up!

So in some sense the 'dropping out' from a false motivation for doing anything can be a preparation for finding and living from a true foundation. This, however is a matter of self-honest willingness for life and not the manipulation of consciousness.

Marriages are of an intimacy of being - not of state power

A Simple Solution to the same sex marriage war
from the Daily Bell

- - -

A breath of fresh air. Thanks. I felt prompted to mention civil partnership and some observations about 'marriage'.

In Uk a 'civil partnership' is denied opposite sex couples. (Some obligations and rights accrue from "Living Together as Husband and Wife" even though not married).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_partnership_in_the_United_Kingdom

However, neither the state - nor any other institution in our case - has anything to do with the consecration of our relationship in Life. Nor has mere material mechanism any sight of it excepting to note or quantify behaviours from which to 'reverse engineer' in theories that simply embody their starting point. If we should ritually witness and declare our willingness for love within a group or community it would be the extension of such a gift within a larger willingness and capacity to share in its blessing. For that which touches the many as one without coercion is reflected in our relationship together but not defined by it or any part of it alone. Ritual sanctification cannot make the untrue, true, but witnessing strengthens by sharing.

A civil partnership operates a legal framework of agreement that provides for the civil rights, duties and protections of a relational entity and leaves the nature of that relationship open. It is not pretending to deal with spirituality nor presuming to sanctify. That aspect retains the freedom of the relationship - within its larger relational context. It doesn't presume to exercise 'moral' power. Nor have power to disqualify or invalidate moral integrity.

Definitions are our primary currency. The 'gold standard' of definitions is tangible and demonstrable - shareable - meaning and value. You know who you are in the act of extending and sharing it in act of thought word and deed.  Adulteration of currency with the mere forms derived from presumed, believed or expected meanings, leads to trading in debt - where something is gotten without extension of shared worth. What is gotten without an extending of appreciation can hardly be recognized or shared as value, and so a 'materialism' of transactional getting substitutes for a living communication, and if this is accepted currency then the form of relationship serves to actively substitute for intimacy of being - and becomes a defence against it!

The wealth of meaning and value that shared life (lived relationship) opens is beyond measure - but can be covered over by a sense of unworthiness and fear of loss, which immediately project onto the other and thus triggers attempts to coerce and control which necessarily deceives by hiding the act of self-hatred or fear in strategic presentations that deny or  try overcome what is made fearful by hiding it.

Marriage can mean many things to many people. But what makes a marriage alive is what that relationship is consecrated to or founded upon, and thus brought to the relationship in free willingness. The forms of marriage by themselves do not constitute a living commitment of sharing life, but they may reflect evolving patterns of personal and social need.

Truth is not a matter of fixing down definitions so as to mutually agree, but of accepting and living what is true for oneself without imposing upon others. The idea of determining truth has been subordinated to the 'divide and rule' that limits to form based set of meanings, which can then be manipulated. But discerning truth is a matter of listening and speaking in truly shared willingness. That is, it is itself a real relationship to which what is untrue is brought to light and resolved at the level of current willingness. The act of withholding or withdrawing from willingness for communication is of an wilful but often unconscious identification within a fear or unworthiness that effectively operates in lieu of choice. There is a timing for the free willingness to accept that cannot be forced. At times the most loving act is to effect a form of separation, but not in denial of the others innate capacity to seek and find the awareness of love in a way they can accept and understand.

In attempting to articulate, I offer a framework of reflection. It is not asserting 'truth' upon anyone but extending willingness to whoever it should resonate and be relevant.

What anything is, may be acknowledged or denied by how we define it in usage - regardless of lip-service.

Poisoning the Wellspring of Life... for illusory private gain

Toxic Weed Killer Glyphosate (Monsanto's Roundup) Found in Breast Milk, Infant Formula

The above article needs no elaboration.
A commenter said:

Monsanto is a plague on planet Earth and its inhabitants.

Cursing may be an understandable reaction, but doesn't challenge the framework within which the problem is set and so it perpetuates or persists in it whilst identifying in righteous reaction.

Use what you know is NOT you to identify what IS you and the emotional force of disgust or anger etc to more forcefully align to who you Are - instead of being lured into identified by what you are not. Repentance in its original sense is an immediate release or dropping of baggage that occurs from waking truth. There is a kind of thinking - a kind of identity - that operates as an enslaving and destructive influence upon our lives - and our ways of interpreting and experiencing our lives.
Truth shows you you are free, but unless we act from it, we undermine our own true wholeness with thinking that seeks power and freedom from and over others, and that is not our true relationship with life - no matter how many acting as if it was for however long.
I only write this as an example of using the negative when it manifests in our experience, to generate a positive outcome. But this means questioning or challenging everything we believe true about ourselves and our world - and THAT is the wake-up that few come to without a crisis of a most fundamental choice.
Re integrating to true being will never arise from within a dis-integrity of being; the false has to be recognized and no longer given allegiance. Hating and fighting feeds attention of a negative charge to what otherwise would NOT be given the power to deny your wholeness of being. One starts wherever and in whatever one finds to be the case and the key is a listening receptivity to true being in a true willingness rather than being identified by fear's reaction.
Monstanto is a cocreated expression of fear, hate and deluded disconnection from the knowing that is our natural and true inheritance. As well as holding the false to witness and account, look to our true appreciation of Life and let it communicate through us - and in shared reflection, to us -instead of seeking to manually usurp and manipulate the Life to our own private agendas.

Just Placebos

Are Antidepressants Just Placebos with Side Effects?
By John Horgan on scientificamerican.com

I looked up the above page as one example of the revealing that the firm marketing Prozac distorted and hid internal results of their own trials that indicate no improvement over a placebo. While there is a case for fraud in this - as well as side effects from additives to the supposed active ingredient - I addressed the scientific relationship with placebo and thus with consciousness itself below. But the picture of a segregative and fearful mentality does offer illumination to the actions of Big Pharma or any other vested and powerful interest that has 'captured' its own regulators or become 'invisible' to the healing response that would undo their legitimacy and withdraw allegiance and support.

- - -

The title gives away an ignorance; "Just placebos".
Science tends to 'just diminish' or even deny consciousness because it is built on a negative or fear-based definition of consciousness by which such 'self' and its experience of 'world' are divided and an almost entirely external 'reality' thus believed to happen to or even generate an almost entirely private self that then seeks to map out, adapt to, and manage or control it and thus engage in struggle that outpictures an inner conflict kept private and protected by focussing almost exclusively 'out there' or anywhere but within consciousness - even though all of our experience occurs within and as a consciousness event and is interpreted or rendered meaningful by the the definitions assigned it.
The negatively defined 'self' operates over and against
others and its world and its true nature. And does so as an incredible complex defence system. While you accept its thoughts or belief as your own.
Inspiration comes into an otherwise closed or limited focus because the conditions allow it. Conditional love is the mask of definition by which one permits communication and relationship to occur. It is always presence, but the mind maps out its fragmented personae as a strategy of coping with the intolerable.
Wanting something 'out there' to make it better is a kind of magic - but not to be derided if it works for the duration of its helpfulness.
Coming to an inner willingness to let life in - that is to stop blocking healing by complex levels of conscious and unconscious diversion and displacement - might pass through any kind of outer journey, but when the obstruction fades or diminishes, the synchronicity meets the willingness.
"Just placebo" is so powerful as to be invisible. Rationalists tend to deride beliefs, but are ignorant of the metaphysical assumptions within their self definition. And so they are often 'believers in Science' rather than applying the discipline of Science to all that it pertains - within and without.
The belief in "The One True Reality" persists in Science that thinks it threw of religious shackles. Depression can be many many different things at different times for different people. But within itself is a seed of being a natural part of a larger process of unfolding - that our definitions of self do not generally accept, understand or make culture of holding through.
But one has to work with people's belief systems rather than coercively impose definition upon them from "society" - for that is emotional and psychological violence regardless the 'god' that 'justifies the self-righteous'.
Exploring through experience is part of what Humanity is and does. The false is often if not always engaged with as a potential precursor to a waking to the true - and acting our as who you know you know yourself to be - and believe as an expression of the extension of value rather than a search for identity in the world. Loving and I use that to indicate genuine relationship - identifies us perfectly. The attempt to possess it, control it or milk it like the moneylenders or other gangster racketeers - offers a false identification that promises much, but delivers mere passing illusion and robs us of joy and life. However, I don't ask anyone to believe that. Just be honest with yourself rather than blank cheque allegiance to the thinking that frames everything falsely.
Honesty = I do not know, but paradoxically the yielding to that simple truth, shifts us to a receptivity of a knowing that is always current - and whilst it can in a sense be translated into verbal mental concept as insight or practical action of a helpful nature, it cannot be patented and stored and used as a weapon. Only a 'stolen' illegitimate copy can be paraded as a finely dressed Emperor.
The helpfulness of anything within a genuine desire for fulfilment is no one else's business. But if it becomes a hindrance it is to be thanked and released - or else what is currently helpful cannot come in.
The self we trade in and make currency of, is as much a con as the debt-based money system. It gives up wholeness of relationship and communication for a central controller. You wont find it in the body - not even the brain. There is no such controller - but there is a harmony of unified purpose and there is the virtual layer of the mind that can operate conflicting purpose - because mind is not coercive by nature - only in conceptual construct. The exploration of an apparently material 'Reality' can only flip to reveal Mind - but the mind identified and invested in its model and revenue stream works to obfuscate and delay the obvious as if it were its failure or death, rather than its re-purposing to alignment of integrated being. And so it exports failure and death because these are the values by which it believes itself prevailing victorious.
Everything is what we make of it - but what we are already making of it frames our options and conditions a sense of unnecessary or illegitimate limitation.

Gravity

Why were prehistoric animals so huge?

It was late, I was new browsing and came upon this science promo article.
I started writing about gravity...


- - -

Gravity taxes land animals. It made a huge difference to me as I grew from a child to adult hood.  Perhaps gravity was significantly less when gigantic creatures lived.
Perhaps time and space are also not as fixed and rigid as we have come to believe.
Perhaps "millions of years" operate as a distancing symbol from the Creative - from That agency or power of expression that creates the past within the Instant of always as part of an unfolding of experience within infinity.
Why is gravity so incredibly weak in relation to all other known forces - and yet the strongest within our experience of human embodiment.
Perhaps science will grow beyond a gravity based model of that renders the Living Universe into dead terms?
Consciousness is infinitely beyond the range of the physical and isn't subject to gravity unless it takes itself seriously and crystalizes in-form-ation by focussing within contraction and density as a protective gesture around the idea of non-existence, self-doubt, threat and otherness. That is to create virtual minds or nodes of focusing experience within itself - each with its virtual world experience.
Why not! would answer many questions of actuality. Obviously, Life does because it can - and in some sense desires. The focus of attention indicates value given, and that value is desire embodied. If a pattern of focus establishes itself, and identification arises within it - not that there is ANYTHING separate from the Consciousness act that IS such experience.
Separateness from Life is a human exploration in concept, fleshed out in experience. But such separation - if possible or conceivable - would be non-existence or indeed death. Whether non-existence exists or has any being is a meaningless oxymoron. But as an idea taken seriously, it presents a polarity within Life by which an oppositional force can seem to operate. The electric Universe is a communication and interplay of polarities within ... the Only Existence that knows itself infinitely reflected in all that is. You the reader know your existence reflected in experience. Are you in fact alone? Or is that a temporary condition arising from the filtering and limiting of Infinite Communication by means of a personality construct - not merely individually - but as a Planetary Consciousness within a Galactic Consciousness?
The game of blind man's bluff can pin the donkey's tail wherever it will - but when the blindfold is removed, there is cause for laughter.
"Why" questions are usually statements or assertions disguised as questions.
Why are we here?, presumes 'we' and much of what is meant by 'here'.
Why are you focusing on what you are noticing yourself focusing upon right now? Is the answer really in terms of the past? Or is it the current choice knowingly or unknowingly running as to what you give value to and therefore notice. I say what you give value to - but one's self definition generally cascades a set of values that then pertain to the themes that both express and embody that particular template idea.
Why is my somewhat off topic post so HUGE? Well, I am enjoying myself - or rather an unfolding joy of idea has embodied as this writing through reflecting on "Millions of years", gravity and embodiment or manifestation itself. It simply ran its course and asks nothing of anyone nor seeks persuasion or to elicit agreement.
Thinking outside the box is unboxed thinking of a willingness to recognize resonance and relevance to what is true of me, To reopen channels of inspirational communication that no longer require jamming so as to operate in the dark in apparent independence and self-seriousness. Humans are not a blight on the planet; human thinking is an error from which the rogue growth operates at the expense of its host instead of aligning as integrally part of it.
Perhaps another Civilisation in a probable future - or indeed looking on - might ask, "why were humans so hugely self-limiting?" and the answer is because we mistook it for life, for self, for freedom and power and worshipped the 'rationality' by which we justified our denial of true nature for a sense of control amidst threat that is generated by asserting a sense of control and meeting our own reflection.
One can only expand a model so far before the foundations have to be revised. Clinging to an obsolete idea is to miss the mark for all around is changed and we still think we know what is going on in terms of a past that is not here.
New Idea is more than a remake of an old movie with better cgi. It is the fruit of a true relationship lived. What you give out is what you get back.

Is the sky falling?

Is the Sky Falling?

This op-ed news article prompted this commentary:

The device of deceit by which consciousness 'fragments itself' is of many shifting levels masked by personae.

At the level of the personae an unfolding drama of the grasp for power, by a fear of powerlessness, is thus compelled to coerce in order to persist or 'survive' by getting or taking from others and from Life, that which it believes itself deprived of or specially deserving.

This 'worldly power' operates in cycles that essentially consolidate power, but at the expense of integrity and therefore functionality. Over-controlling life renders it uncontrollable, for suppressed symptoms merely arise everywhere and escalate the believed need for such control at the expense of communication.

Control mentality operates in isolation of separate self interest and while pursuing a sense of special self-interest, can only manipulate via 'incentive' that are negatively predicated - either directly as in fear of consequence or indirectly in seducing dependence within artificially induced scarcity.

I write about nothing BUT consciousness responsibility - for I see this as our next step - our awakening to the acts of definition within consciousness whereby we accept and trade a false sense of self and life and purpose.

I am not suggesting changing consciousness IN ORDER to change the world, but aligning consciousness truly in order to be the change we wanted the world to deliver.

Communicating the perspective of consciousness is difficult when the existing paradigm collectively has the map upside down. One literally has to freely yield one's thinking to connect with Wholeness... with and as Consciousness.

Thinking 'says' this wont make any difference.

Thinking says all kinds of things - but until the predication upon guilt and fear is significantly undone, thinking operates a scam - of sorts - for the attempt to hide FROM fear and to hide IN fear GIVES POWER AWAY.

BUT - what is true of you is not lost and doesn't need to be reclaimed or 'taken back' so much as RECOGNIZED.

Everything is a matter of perspective, and Consciousness ITSELF is the capacity to shift perspective and behold everything within a fresh 'take' rather than a 'mis' take.

However the engagement or preoccupation with trying to change the world first in order to then 'arrive' is a block to shifting perspective and simply locks one into a pattern of limitation and conflict from which there is no escape WITHOUT shifting perspective to where escape is no longer a meaningful necessity.

One doesn't 'escape' oneself - or any facet of oneself - but one does choose where to bring one's focus of attention within All That Is.

Focussing on the negative as if to get a positive result is a mistaken and futile self-deception - even if a few billion reinforce each other in the attempt.

Re-integrative consciousness is not trying to fix Humpty Dumpty under the King's orders but embracing the healing of one's own consciousness so as to in effect withdraw support for the 'botnet of fear' and align in true - joyous - purpose. Then one may speak true to the mind that is identified within un-owned fear. But otherwise the blind lead the blind - and of course all with conflicting agendas attempting to manipulate outcome.

Coercion is NOT the way of communication, honouring relationship or integrity and so truth is its first casualty. But that doesn't mean truth isn't true, it simply means it is temporarily denied witness.

Scientific prostitution to corporate coercion

Real Tragedy of 'Science': Public Faith Declines as Fakery Grows

A Daily Bell article on false peer reviews uncovered in scientific prostitution to corporate coercion.


- - -

A Consciousness Perspective:

Identity theft is nothing new. Truth is not 'out there'. Insofar as anything true is 'out there' it is recognized through one's own truth.

As Consciousness is accepted as our Ground Reality there will be no need to manufacture or employ 'truths' as weapons of leverage and control because truth will be self-evident and beyond question or conflict.

In the mean 'minded' while, any form of anything is meaningless (or means anything and nothing) because the meanings given to things reflect a false or conflicting identification as the 'doer' or 'controller' of consciousness. This is self-illusion or vanity of ignorance and arrogance. Nothing worthy or sane can come of it save the recognition and release of what we are NOT.

Science predicated upon materialism already asserts metaphysical notions that filter and distort receptivity to truth. Of course many notions operate true within their specific range of focus and provide frameworks of intervention into existing patterns of relationship. When enough people agree, their mutually reinforcing definitions operate as currency regardless whether they share true value or pass off toxic debt in place of true worth.

"I" me and "self' are shorthand symbols for facets of the operation of will, but when will is usurped by conditioned belief, it operates the illusion of freedom under the tyranny of fear. What is given power to, becomes power over the giver, because it is asserted and believed true.

Hiding a lie or hiding in a lie may be 'justified' by the narrative of the liar - such as not publicizing information that reflects badly on one's institution and thus give ammunition to the perceived 'heretics' who must at all cost be prevented from gaining influence. But that has nothing to do with science as a discipline of uncovering the (already) true. It is simply the idea of war upon the hated self.

The egocentricity of the segregative or separating self is implicit in the use of the term self, in most usage. But corruption operates upon something true or it would have no meaning as corruption. Corruption begins with taking self-image over true relation and protecting it at cost of truth. It operates a mask or deceit by which NOT to know what in fact one knows. It splits the mind. It plays apart as if oppositional and separate, and seeks the validation that only real relationship offers by joining in forms that mimic aspects of unity without actually joining or relating with anything beyond its own strategy.

Recognizing 'out-of-true' is the opportunity to true up. NOW. Blame operates to divert from truing up, punishment to forbid it - save through long diversionary 'processes of change' that effectively kick real change into long grass while engaging hypocrisy (acting). Tyranny is first within the mind of refusal to embrace and embody change (life). Freedom is an inside job - an 'in-place' shift of perception and perspective that uncovers an already freedom which had been 'given away' to a dream of power and self-specialness. But freedom cannot truly 'leave you' at the level of your true nature - though one can actively deny it in assertion of imagined right to override true nature. We are free to war within ourself if we want, while it gives us something we believe we need or want enough to pay the price.

The baby in the bathwater is the uncorrupted service of science to true uncovering of Who we are and what Life Is. Because one begins from a false foundation there is a necessary revisionary shifting as a greater perspective illuminates the error of one's starting place. However, the inspirational movement to follow one's joy of discovery and gifting of talent in service of life is itself pure - even if imperfectly appreciated within the framework of egocentric identity and drives.