On the Novel Biotech Reset

 in response to the themes in:

https://khmezek.substack.com/p/mrna-madness-its-only-just-begun/

The PR sells to investors as a means to profits, as well as capture and control of marketshare - which is now called mindshare.
So the story is spun on the basis of 'emergent' opportunities that are often ingenious devices to evade  disclosure for fraud.
IE the lack of empirical basis to support virus contagion theory - a mainstay of pharma's model - led to a retreat into genetic modelling in which no empiric science as such need be engaged - for the genetic definitions are in effect 'globally imposed standards' that have no whole, isolated or characterised thing to which they pertain. Humpty Dumpty code constructs that can be inserted into PCR 'tests' as well as programmed into the printing of 'mRNAcode™ under a biotech (Pharma 2.0) monopoly cartel.
The wish, fear and belief that transfection results in the programming of cells to then manufacture proteins is a Frankensteinian variation of standard contagion fear.
There is a basis in life for making your own version of 'realities' with which you have resonance, in your own way and for your own reasons, in your own timing , as part of your own unfolding of experience through which to 'know thy self', including freedom to experience yourself as you are not by living the reactions to false imaged beliefs given love of energy and attention.
This is the 'original sin' or error by which the mind can hack itself - as if at the hand of another. This is the grievance-based victim that would justify attack and make love and virtue of joining in hate. This is the vengeance that rages - hot or cold - at God & life for not supporting its wish to make self-illusion real, as a deeps sense of rejection, denial and treacherous abandonment that it has NO sense of participating in, for it casts out separation trauma by distance and masking attack so as to save itself from exposure to truth it was invoked to 'make you safe ' from.
So there are and will be collective experience of 'diseases' and iatrogenic 'solutions' as the repackaging of life-conflict into forms more masked, insidious and dysfunctional to the point of crisis that force a radical change. Yet here we are with a concerted intent to double down into radical reset of the 'hijack & capture to control' model.
It is always some form of black-box of 'mysteries' of contradictions set in arcane obfuscation to be guarded by a priesthood of elitism or self-specialness usurping authority and its enforcements or natural protections. Above all it defends against Disclosure of an alien will - that is loveless and without true father - as invoked to replace true Power in life by power set over and apart - alien - to life.
True presence is not only the nature of love's appreciation, but that of true with-ness and worth-ship - as a resonance of coherency. Felt and shared.
I also note the funding and seeding of nanotech development under pretext of gaining function for pharma-drug and bio-code delivery systems, These are on the cusp of a biology that uncovers bio-field functions far far more complex and subtle than the grafting of computer coding to the 'serpents' - that are really the nature of self-organising plasma - that has a unique translation through the 'waters' of life.
Bio-field manipulations are more likely the mass 'experiment' of the intent to marketise and weaponise a 'new frontier'. THAT is fear set for Getting as the driver of a predictive programming set in and technologised for war.
And the more upstream the insiders, the more able to steal not just the kingdom but the minds and thought of kings. Who controls the imaging symbols, codes and languages of our thought gets to play Simple Simon through a world of golems?

I recommend reading with your own discernment always; "The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events" by Jane Roberts (Seth) - even if you would usually avoid 'communications' that don't fit within our current culture of a physically determined and bounded reality.

Toxic debt repackaging has a long history that we see as evolutionary development, if we shift from Self-evasions to self integrative Self revealing, then all serves as a vehicle through which to more consciously embrace and appreciate a greater shared participance in all that we are.


Howard, I was prompted to join with your point - not to address it all to you!
(Michael Levin may be able to provide such a relocated

Retraining our mind to operate from listening within

in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/chaos-agents-vs-love/comments

 

 I find this 'ego dynamic' very clearly revealed in A Course in Miracles, but as that is a retraining of the mind to live from the miraculous nature of love we do not make, that is our truth - regardless (what we make or buy into), it (The Course) isn't an intellectual or philosophical teaching, so much as serving the recognition we can and have mis-taught ourselves (personally and collectively) such as to generate a masking substitution for reality by which the false sets the true in its rules and filters to a reversal of cause and effect - such that a world outside and Other seems to make, subject and define a 'limited and broken' love, set in seeking outside itself by a sense of lack and disconnection that rises from the wish to specialness.
I don't generally promote the Course or quote it, but live my own reintegrative willingness of its principle teaching, which is listening within to the quality of wholeness and unified purpose that is the gift of our being - beneath the gift we sought to give ourself 'special'.
So yes to aligning our thought and word to a love that moves all things, and reveals in the loving, not the mind of grasping. This is a basis of true cultural recognition and exchange. Rather than seeking to put Humpty together again from a position of a broken or conflicted sense of limitation - in which we will never truly be Homed, yet we may cling to and die in rather than risk out of the comfort and control zone of the 'self/world' we have made by the attempts to separate, mask, hide, escape, overcome, fix, eradicate or heal in our OWN terms & conditions - running beneath as our learned or acquired conditioning under fear, guilt and offset or diversion of blame as penalty of sacrifice or loss.
It's all a mind of judgement set AS IF over and apart.
It can speak to your 'specialness' as 'love' and yet in an instant turn to guilting hate if you don't comply. This inner gaslighting is part of a trauma-survival complex that is no longer active - but persists as if the past is stamping the present into a future like itself. True Presence is a gift of being that a dissociated mind has discarded, forgot and set in fear of pain of loss FROM a mind that persists the patterns of fear as control, conflict and lack.
Changing our mind about our mind is the willingness to question and release what we have accepted and believed real and adapted to, because only truth is true. There is no peace in lies, and no joy but expresses the freedom of being truly moved.
The understanding that there is nothing hidden within lies that reveals truth is free to those who seek not to hide from truth.
However the game of Peep Boo! is universally recognised by babies, as a basis of consciousness in our experience of unfolded being - our lives. The gift we gave ourself was not for Getting, but for Giving and receiving in the heart of one.

Consolidation of leverage owns 'The Science'

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/12/19/watch-the-climate-change-gambit/

The effective capture of ‘global’ organisations in terms of narratives to guidelines to regulatory dictates inserted into contracts, is not much concerned with arguing as it effectively owns “the science”.

The current vast disparity of wealth is not just assets but leverage, that is used to consolidate control to those who join in corrupting lawful communication and exchange to serve a private self interest: that is to structure a hierarchy of control that locksteps freedom into ‘survival’ set against fear of pain of loss – which runs corollary with being out of true with our life, world and true self.

Hence it masks in ‘saving’ narratives that appeal to a future alignment after breaking the ‘obstacles’ that are scapegoated or false flagged to be the cause of toxic dissonance – so as to weaponise its guilt by repackaging as virtue under ideological capture to crafted lies of self-evasive gain of function.

(Degradation and dysfunctional life as sacrifice for the persistence of a segregative ‘separation’ set over and against its own life).

I am not a body automata

 in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/12/19/a-howling/

Look into the eyes of those your meet and greet or you will look to images you raised instead. For we can mask in the forms of love or affection so as to learn ways of seeming to meet without really joining.

Why do we not - but what we expect to see is already imaged in mind to shape 'automatic' defences or reactions that 'prove' the belief that set them?

A little willingness is not a stare, but an opening to presence not pre-manufactured by a concept that carpets and blinds to a realm of shadows cast to a screen or cave wall.


The ideal of self-autonomy - to be as a god to our own life - runs an automaton of unconsciousness if running on judgements set by a past that sets them still.

To be as one with God in our own life is established in that we never did or can create our own existence, but that mutually agreed alignments in ways that selectively focus so as to collectively discard, deny or put out of 'mind' can and do put us out of the awareness of the Mind of God. If 'God' is too abused a term, choose for whatever stands clear when we 'thinketh not'. For 'Is' Is. And what we think cannot replace the field of desire that alights the moment of fulfilment, even if we so grasp as if to keep or possess for a 'self' we take from it. But who can hold focus in the world but by persisting an experience of a 'self-possession' that meets conflict, adversity in change and challenge through which an ego is both grown or developed and adapted to as an adjustment or compromise - through which we have the time of our lives, that is - we unfold our experience together through terms or contract of largely acquired and inherited patterns of a collective 'agreement' if only be default of running as result of not choosing differently, from a fresh evaluation. So the past stamps to present a future like itself as if THIS time, it will be different! And it can seem to escape, to win, overcome or prevail for a time until the core contradictions reassert the predicates that we assign to Others and to World (and to God).

Uncovering conflict in our own mind can be experienced as incandescent rage, putrid disgust - that is intolerable pain & sickness of 'self' that has no capacity to 're-evaluate' anything but every liability to project out onto our life, our relationships, our world in ways that may offer mitigation or temporary respite by casting or projecting OUT and AWAY from the attempt to manage what remains, and remake some sense of 'solidity' or normalise a masked out sense of self-protection.

Yet a 'protection' or a 'love' that is re-triggered to conflict and defence when its terms and conditions for 'safety' are not met. When love turns to hate, is it not that attempts to mask over or escape fear break down to reveal an attempt to DO love from a fearful sense of threat, disconnection and pained fear of loss?


Choosing not to join in hate or harm must abide it to the point of recognising we do not want it. And standing in that decision.This in effect gives up the attempt to 'fix ourselves', to a release that opens to That which truly releases us from self-reinforcing conflict.


Love that is impotent, is not love, but a substitute accepted in its place that will bind us to false or magic 'protections' that require sacrifice to maintain and can never have 'enough' control. For no amount of control will substitute for love, regardless the acting out of fantasy upon the body or the world.


A grounded reference point:


https://twitter.com/onemindinmany/status/1528364482828898306?s=20&t=7Qw0ul_fmxxrsfVkDIBPHw

Fact that cant be questioned show you where to begin questioning

 in response to the themes in:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the/

Find established fact that cant be questioned and you know where to begin questioning.
DNA was/is a globally invested technology that did not deliver promised/expected returns.
Like so much else of the 'science', it is spun out of a black box that is linked with or identical to 'dark research' be that military or corporate (its both).
Note 'Intelligence' is now a cloak of transnational security for a global biotech agenda. Upstream to what DNA dogma was supposed to reduce life to, is the realm of bio-electromagnetic field or bio-field. The research into this is the intent to weaponise and marketise 'applications' using nano-particles (which are a natural component in bio-function) but are being designed to 'gain function' from Nature so as to 'fix it' or 'improve and upgrade it'. Graphene Flagship being but one example.
Virology was falsely conceived, unfounded but so invested in as to be too big to fail. It retreated to pathological GENETIC modelling (black-box definitions - but WHO regulates or validates the elite institutions that announce them - often by press release!
So the biological model of life is the most pathological factor involved in all of this, but it is too big to fail as a compound global investment over generations - such that everything/everyone ELSE must be sacrificed to 'save it'. - albeit as a much more rigidly defined and controlled dogma.
The model assigns artefacts to life that either don't exist or introduce distortion filters by which to work against healing - ie as if to boost 'your immune system', or 'fix your genes'.
As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by  germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses.
It isn't just elites who are invested in a pathological worldview, but the Many, whose investment is of a personal and social identity.
So a falsely founded identity in assumed science is compelled to look within the black box of its assumptions for what isn't there - excepting as a derivative pattern - which is pervasive and increasing evident to anyone with eyes to see as exactly like a usurping, hacking virus, or rogue parasitic cancer in its operation at the level of our minds, our currency of thought and our resulting feedback of interpretation we call the world.

If you are precise you cant say 'the vax' when there are known to be various batches of various brands kept and delivered and injected under various conditions, but I feel reasonable in asserting it is a toxic shock at least - for it has to be to qualify as 'generating an immune response'. (Discounting the known switch to saline placebo in at least some conscientious medical staff).

Shock can be also emotional or dare I say it 'psychic'. The overall emotional context for this agenda was of unprecedented and deliberate application of shock treatment to the goal of coercing such and outcome - either for the result of the injections themselves and/or the institutional structure of biotechnological status of bio-insecurity, that is no longer merely inadequate but a risk factor to the 'herd' collective and so no longer holding rights as an individual under 'contagion theory' running unchecked. (quite apart from carbon guilting or thought crime regarding other securitised narratives for economic control, through the enforcing of 'environmental, social and governmental' regulatory requirements.

Many think damage control is still feasible as part of an establishment set in an old normal.  So I expect they will be used for such purpose as a tool of the intent to reset human beings as bio assets for experiment or whimsy.
Genetic control/eugenics is not just for depopulation agenda.

#2
A Midwestern Doctor
The only possible alternative hypothesis I can think of was that the people in charge decided to switch on 5g when the vaccines were rolled out and have the vaccines act as a cover for that. I don't think that's what happened, but that is the only possible alternative hypothesis I have come across.

the tech we sort of know about is not just that 5g can be turned on, but that it can be used in various modes and intensities, that interact with mind and body functions. At the very least to interfere with functional integrity of the biofield/gel water with living systems, and in some cases to affect nanoparticulates - ie to ionic dispersal or molecular clumping. I don't know what is being sprayed in the skies - now officially - under 'weather control' or sun dimming or aerosol 'medications/vaccinations'. It's a black box. Just as the 'elitism' generates a sealed unit in which we are to operate with no user access - not unlike a rat maze in a lab.
So there's a few more far-out possible factors that might play into either the physical or the psychic realm of effects that are both in play.

I am aware that belief in a threat operates as effectively regardless of being real - especially once induced into defences given status of protecting or boosting immunity. So I lean to a world of lies going much deeper than we would think - for thinking was derived from them. But on a brighter note, the lie is only thus as a capacity to pass off as true. So uncovering the false is the freedom to now seek and find truth - not least by refining our questions from an expanding embrace of truth, lived felt and shared rather than 'modelled' for predictive control.

#3

If the spike preceded its 'virus' what is it?
It seems to me to be indirectly assayed by means of the same kinds of 'tests' as generated a test-demic. It is supposed to be produced (minus its virus body) by genetically modified human cells after injection and transfection (via nanotech hydrogels), for that is the stated purpose and function of the gene therapy-cum-vaccine.
But is that taken as fact because experts say? is it another case of cell debris being flagged as 'spike' protein - as a spiking narrative in a mutating novel?

I note the MSMedia(lockstepped as it is) & social media, pushing the memes of sudden death athletes and celebs WITHOUT assigning injections as suspects. This leads the public to 'join the dots' and set the belief as their own thinking - bases not unreasonably on distrust of the whole business of fearporn led globally orchestrated coercion. So while I do believe they are toxic, I am wary to being coopted into consenting against my will by mindless reactions.
In their terms the result they seek is a biosecurity state or a biotech revolution.
I translate this as bio-insecurity status set into technocratic controls even at the level of biological augmentation. In order to get consent I see a narrative of being irrevocably damaged to become a reset for original sin under a new Technate.
Again :- Belief something is so, can function as such, regardless truth - once invested in by reaction. Who has eyes to see is of a discernment in the heart of wholeness or integral sovereignty - that is - within life - not set over or as if apart.

#4
I don't prefer the use of 'immune system' as such but of the natural homeostasis of a living system in maintaining its core functions amidst change and challenge.
I also lean to Hamer's understanding of cancers as 'biological shocks' that have both conflict and healing phases according to the nature of the shock and the organs affected - ie fear of death goes to the lungs.

But I note research on nagalese and GcMAF, such that one is in some sense supporting the 'cancer' growth and the other turns off to allow reintegration.
As with anyone achieving real results for those with cancers (especially the 'go home and die' stage), David Noakes and Lyn Thyer were subjected to thuggery.
While not about GcMAF, the thuggery was very clearly revealed in the documentary "Cancer is a Serious Business", freely watchable.

One we bought into an immune system, we had to keep it boosted!
But our sense of self and life can be shocked, undermined, depreciate and depleted under constant strain and set into recurring patterns of resetting the trauma such as to regress to an incapacity to sustain the conditions for living.

Reflections on the root of technocracy

Reflections on the root of technocracy

in response to the themes in:

https://iaindavis.com/china-the-worlds-first-technate-part-2

The mind of predictive control is our capacity to model in imagination as a means to both define and navigate a world that we then adapt to or ‘inhabit mutual agreements running beneath our focus of consciousness in the world as we then perceive it.

With the explication of such consciousness to technological infrastructures and computer processing, we are increasing inhabiting our own explicated mind, as a prison that once operates a means to ‘make safe’ by evading, working round or overcoming conflicts. But like a military Industrial habit, ratcheted only tighter for it has its own identity complex, and generates the results that serve its persistence.

The interesting thing about a model or image of reality is that it is a kind of copy or representation in parts but never can be reality – even if it can be of service to a coherent or practical outcome in life. Yet by it we have collectively displaced or alienated our consciousness from a flowing connected presence -EXCEPT when in alignment with service to a coherent or practical outcome in life – ie joy in purpose.

Whys sketch out such observations?
I feel the territory of our unfolding world changes is not just externalised subjection to systems of our own making, but a result of a default persistence or loop of mis-taken identity, within a humanity that is not as we mask and perceive it to be but as an invested collectivised identity dictates. What might this be but what a predictive control was made to substitute for? That is to say, an original basis from which to live that was lost or covered over by separation trauma – from which a fragmented sense of self developed abilities to adapt to and define or normalise brokenness as a becoming in our own right – or at least in rights under All the king’s horses and all the king’s men.
The attempt to manually usurp what life already is, makes us into daleks 😉

 

 

 

Luciferase in Biotech & its namesake

 

 in response to the themes in:

 https://khmezek.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-luciferase/

 

Consider the shift from clinical sickness requiring empirical facts to 'syndromes' set in biomarkers setting diagnosis by adjustable 'tests' rigged to definitions that spin out of a black box science of a self-regulating elitism.
In other words question the veracity of 'the science' ESPECIALLY when funded by huge investments that not only seek a profit, but a platform through which to operate.
From 'virology/immunology' to 'genetic modifications' to biofield hacks.

The ability to use biomarkers is set in narratives based on heavily funded and often dark science - ie spun out of defence research to corporate 'application'.

Perhaps you believe viruses have been found to operate as sold, but even so you must be able to see that belief generates an ideological capture.
So there may be something in cellular debris that 'spike'-protein can be assigned to, but it didn't come from a whole virus as purported. It preceded the construct of the gene sequence from which it is suppose to have derived. So how can mRNA 'work' to make 's-protein' - for example.

I am suggesting a deeply set series of fallacies on which a framework of experienced meanings are be-lived real, by reactions that 'deliver to the physician'. That is 'Luciferian' in terms of guilting or gaslighting as a means to possess and control the living as a source of vengeance on life.

How many see the lie on which the world of control set in fear and conflict operates?
But then to truly see is release, but to set the lie as a mystery cloaked in terror, is to believe it the source of life; the way it works, the stamp of a mind by hate. In other words a self-reinforcement of what we are looking WITH.

Well done for picking the strands out and honouring each for its contribution.
Both the religious and the scientific mind can serve the masking of truth even while seeming to seek it. But deep dissonance needs to be brought to light, rather than used to invoke light as a weapon. For when we would make truth a weapon, we run off with a false light, that reveals only to conceal - as endless hoops or rabbit holes by which to 'seek truth' but never find.
The mind of defence is ingeniously evasive to capture the belief we have eradicated it.
But only love is truly creative. Fear makes shifting illusions by which to 'keep us in the game'.
That illusions have only the power we give them, is hardly powerless to the mind made by believing.

Terrain is True Context

 in response to the themes in:

https://mikestone.substack.com/p/all-terrain

 

Any specific expression is of a field or total environment.
We have a 'reality adjuster' of a mind that creates a model of its reality to 'contract into'.
Reality is 'one' - (the one is redundant).
But our imaging projections - given priority as a self-creation generate a 'choice' between imaged meanings of truth and acceptance of truth.
Why do I go 'deeper' than our world?
Because there is a sense in which we 'made a world' to hide in & hide from by contracting to mask a split mind in mutually agreed definitions. Not by bits of paper but by mutually reinforcing self-illusion. So in that sense we are deeply invested stakeholders in an underlying  'war' on reality-feared' and protected by projection of denial cast out to 'others' and to 'world'.
But thoughts do not leave the mind of the thinker, and so there is nowhere 'else' to get rid of denied or ignored Self but unconsciousness that is nested IN the arena of its denial as its filters of experience, and running as if 'conscious'.
But thoughts do not leave the mind of the thinker, and so you never did and never did and never could 'leave' or be rejected from the Mind of your Creator, of which your true expression as a true heart, waits only on welcome and not on time.

There is a meme that we only use a tiny percent of our 'brain/mind', but the reality is we use 100% to create the experience of being tiny, limited, vulnerable and bio-insecure in need of constant boosting via sacrifice to fear masking control as Protector and Guide.

The disempowering of Mind is an 'attack' on reality, but if looked at directly it reveals our power in its ability to set up defence against (our own) reality, as if at the hand of an other.

The pathogen is but one specific representation of the 'reversal of cause and effect' of a virtual image or model running the minds that made it!
So at this level 'terrain' is Context - not just of associated symptoms or effects - but of of an embracing reality denied by the focus on selected effects as causes to the masking or denial of our own participation.

So every experience has an element of usually unconscious participations that can be revealed by willingness to let curiosity move us past the rules and filters of a masking strategy for surviving lovelessness set in fear and guarded by guilt. Likewise abiding through the appearances of lovelessness to the uncovering of a true appreciation, removes support for a gaslighting around an apparent security set in substitutes for a real relationship. Love and science area truly grounded reality. Both are used to mask in - but then our experience of reality is false, hollow and demanding sacrifice to maintain 'control' or save the face of our ego from a real relationship (Reality).

Life Set in Projected Symbol

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY8DMV2SY98
I was about to watch the above but it premised its outset in the modelling of scientific ‘dark fudge’ to support its model and save the appearances claimed real – as the Emperor’s new clothes.
So I wrote this instead.


Separation trauma sets symbolic archetypal patterns as primary conditioning to a split or dissociation from Mind.
Such symbols are the architecture of our sense of meaning, identity and culture - that after its catastrophic past set the steady state cosmos and consciousness of world that generated rational and organisational capacities to the shift from a mythic sense shaped by religion, to an object model of predictive control shaped by science.
Plasma physics and electric universe paradigm offers a re integrative path to a science set in active ignorance as the investment of identity in material manipulations, by which to marketise and weaponise discoveries, as well as to distort or conceal discoveries that were seen as threat to possession and control as an inherently private agenda, regardless its social or political organisation, for control is set over life, others and world and so at its root it separates and conflicts to a pathological model requiring sacrifice and fudge as 'too big to fail'.
And so even as the first recorded impressions of pre antiquity onwards became mutating stories and themes that could no longer be linked to lived experience of peoples around the Earth, yet reveal psychic or psychological patterns that replicate in always morphing arenas of thought and endeavour, so also do scientific models become cultural identity complexes that seek to maintain a unity against fundamental revision by an active ignorance of 'discovering' new iterations that reflect and reinforce the original premises - regardless lack of empirical validation - excepting where technological applications require ever more complex ad-hoc mathematical extensions - expressed not as human science, but as a recipe or formula for manipulating objects or matter.
There are various aspects to the Lucifer in mythic or symbolic themes, but in scientific terms I venture 'gaslighting' as the true nature of the Promethean theft, or indeed the mis-taken inheritance of the Prodigal Son - as the nature of a dissociation defended against truth of a relational being that cannot be brought INTO dissociation - excepting as symbolic substitutions that are then 'objectified' or taken out of living Context.
Fear set in shock can trigger recoil to contraction - along with distancing as denial, masking in a basis for control from which to set a focus in NOT KNOWING, as the basis of becoming something in our own right; a self in itself, surrounded by thing-in itself, whose Source is so distanced as to allow the developing consciousness of a world and universe in its own terms.
What is the basis for control but guilt that stamps the boot of its past grievance onto the rising of a present into a future like itself? It doesn't see itself as anything but justified or compelled by externally driven necessity - which is its 'dark father'.
The Saturnian era became a lost Golden Age, an old normal that a hateful and unworthy chaos has deprived or denied a self-reality set in image and form.
A projection, cast from Heaven seeks to regain what it took as its right, in image upon the body of the world to serve fantasy gratifications that set a mind for getting.
And within this is the hate that was cast out as by denial of the loss of love and power - to an Other.
Self-vindicated by vengeance running as false god or 'dark father'.
There is no peace in it.
It knows not of love, but to manipulate the masks of virtue.
Be mindful when tempted to join in or give identity to hate - regardless the offset of a 'greater evil'.
An abusive 'relationship' uses the relationship to Get from, manipulate, and take possession of, regardless whether as victim or victimiser, for the dark and the light set in symbol are both a mask over a true awareness that is light and knows light by extension, not by sacrifice.

Fear as false basis for thought given power and protection

 The contagion or communication of fear operates a break or breakdown of natural communication to pre-emptively defend a position under attack against a postulated threat.

The mental aspect is not more than a story of asserted differentiations assigned as causal relationships to a potential outcome of impending pain of loss, that itself becomes causal in the mind that then takes the story in by acting from its premise to avoid or mitigate expected attack.
The emotional aspect is of a looping intensification of attention given to the modelling of strategies set from the perspective of the negative outcome as a reality, along with the story that models it.
Thus the self-conditioning investment of identity by which to become a stakeholder and subscriber to such an interpretation as an accepted imposing reality against which to think and act  to limit loss, and attack or overcome the threat, to survive in the terms and conditions set by the modelling of the story.

True relationships partake of one. That is, one extends to another as a relationship in which order arises as the nature of the one through the many.
Our minds have learned & developed the ability to dissociate reality in exactly the pattern of thinking described above. A preferred & persisted imagination of a negative or lack, threat and attack basis, from which to  seek and find validation and reinforcement for the justifictions set to gain a covert dysfunction, over natural relational order of wholeness as unified symbiosis or synchronicity in the purpose of one through the many.
To the self-conditioned reflex, the realm of attack or threat based reality, is without rest of abiding connection, relational integrity, direction or functional support, and so what is innate to one, has to be substituted for by the use of the mind as a command and control function, to make safe within an impossible situation that has only happened in the polarising identification of a mindset in dissociative denial of integral wholeness for the focus in a specific but shifting modelling of arbitrary judgemental selections, that operate as temporary basis for experience of a personal mask of self set by fear to seek substitution for life in collectivised or socially reinforcing narrative distributions of fear, pain & loss in sacrifice to a masking control as the saviour from total loss of face, of self control, to a life feared for what we project onto and attack. Thus our expectation is in like kind, of being projected into, and killed from a reality outside and alien to a tiny fragment of love that is defended and protected against total loss within its complex of masking defences against real and natural relationship and communication by guilt driven fears of retaliation and guilting manipulations of defence.
However, the nature of true relational being is not broken in truth but in concept, as a mis-taken identity in private creation, that can be represented by "I Want It Thus!". Which usurps relational recognition by the pre-emptive set of terms and conditions for reality in which it will permit relationships to conform.
The development of personal and social checks and balances on overriding dictates, becomes the masking arena through which it operates by stealth and guile as a systemic expression of defence against the life it depends on to subvert & deny, as its claim to your existence in its terms.
A segregative movement within life is part of its whole expression. But without life runs blind, loveless and self-limiting, to the point of incapacity to serve or support life.
That we live in life is not a body of imaged thoughts and beliefs running as subconscious conditioned reaction, but that there is no other to life, we have not become other, or set power in other - but by our persistence of invested identification in such a use of freedom to think as an oppositional substitution for Integral Creative, for wholeness is not an in-silico Humpty Dumpty stitched together by all the king’s horses and all the king’s men. Even if that is the driven need of a mindset in limit and loss, seeking wholeness in a 'world' set outside and other by an image that can never by fulfilled or vindicated, but that the dream shifts to nightmare.
It shall run its course, but at any moment of true relational appreciation, it is undone to natural order in which we learn to choose to accept what we are because we want it instead of wanting what we are not and learning to choose for it to gain a normalised or internalised inversion of cause and effect.

“Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health,  Lawyers destroy justice,  Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom,  Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality".    Michael Ellner

False framed - Why not Both And...?

 

 in response to the themes in: Covid-19 – Mass Formation or Mass Atrocity?

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/

 

When an issue is framed in such terms, I feel disinterested in participating in its terms.
Mass formation is a coined term for emotionally driven mind-capture as narrative framed identity.
Conflict in the mind are never in one alone, but expressions of a shared field of unconscious resonance.
That I can articulate some of this does not reveal it nor enable me to claim freedom for myself alone or apart.
Truth reveals only to an honesty of relationship, which in our terms will involve a release of a masking dishonesty set in defences that are for the most part internalised, invisible and running subconscious as habit strategies.
So where is our self and world in what I said so far?
As inherited and acquired conditioning its split runs as causal but masked over.
As an experience its result reflects and reinforces its cause.
Yet within our lives run conflicted and conflicting thoughts, beliefs and purposes - including attempts of All the king’s horses and all the king’s men to maintain a mask of control, continuity and unity. And such is the overhead in unconsciousness and taxes as to leave little free attention for receiving and sharing in anything outside the terms and conditionings of personally nested social rules and filters of security or support relative to an arena of conflict whose core holds archetypal patterns of separation trauma, that can be now articulated as forms of rejection, abandonment, treachery, betrayal, shame, and corresponding defences or coping substitution, but were laid down prior to the development of a mind that is predicated in and by such defences.

So where in this is agency or freedom of will to align in truth that heals and corrects error in ourselves and others? In our present and our past, such as to release the stamp of a past set in grievance to receive future of unbounded potential as our true inherence of being?
It is not in understanding about, taken as knowledge, and applied as a narrative as if to nudge or frame life into order - but in this specific situation given in faith to an awareness that is not our manufacture, but the source of life as one through the whole. In practice this can be likened to pause reaction, so as to listen at the heart in a moment of stillness for connection at a level of knowing that is entirely qualitative - or directly felt or known yet through the situation and to it, so as to run prior to conditioned reactions of a mindset of distancing, masking and attack.

When a masking 'reality' breaks down, it becomes increasing unworkable even in its own terms, such that what was kept hidden or 'cast out' and attacked in the other, can no longer be redefined in a continuity of supplied unconscious for the identity within 'control'. This implicitly offers an opportunity for healing, awakening and reintegration, even while presenting as breakdown to defencelessness against rising threat as loss of control and therefore loss of face to ourselves within deeply unsettling inability to regain or re-assert 'control' without sacrifice of consciousness of integrity or self-honesty. HERE is the choice to NOT choose to deny the life we have and know despite our fear, and this is the release of a groupthink or stake in 'mass formational identity', as a freedom to give attention to the movement of our being, as innate curiosity or freedom to question the questionable. while partaking of a love we have chosen not to deny.
That what we accept we extend is the nature of mind, such that we no longer accept the mask of socially reinforced denials or projective hates as true of us. Or find the habit deeply distressing to allow to run for the sake of 'peace'.
Do the extension in the doings of our lives of a qualitative connection goes forth to gather witnesses and align outcomes, just as did the teaching and learning of a split mind set in evasion or distancing as its 'salvation' from a deeper fear that shall not be known, but masked and attacked in complex defences that teach 'love' demands sacrifice as the means to keep the little that ye hath from the whole of total loss.
There is no substitute for love, nor can All the king’s horses and all the king’s men regain or remake a Golden Age set in and by trauma of loss to seek vindication in vengeance for being denied.
But there is a freedom within being to release the mind of its own mis-creative self-reinforcement, that is ours but for the giving.
But of ourselves alone we cannot give life or even recognise another in life, but must 'join' in substitutions, coded ritual behaviour, wishful acting out of symbols set in mysteries kept obscure.
Eyes to see are not denied us but by an inner dictate running under a blind eye. For believing is seeing, while what we say we believe seeks to mask over what we hate, fear or are ashamed to look on.

Law is rooted in being, by true with-ness given true worth-ship.
False premises set false profits to align as false witness to protect its invested stakeholders.
Attacking the lie and the father of it, is its means of contagion and replication as a 'mind -virus'.
Undoing the basis for the lie to pass off as real, is the result of seeking and loving truth.
Who would make truth a weapon must frame a life in vanity.
But defending awareness of truth is the basis for our sanity.
For without a grounded reference point, a mind spins in its own tale to reap as it sows.

 

The parasitic mindset

in response to the themes in:

 

https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-parasite-class

 #1 (from the opening statements)

Elitism is a cult of self-specialness.

It's exceptionalism or supremacism stems from a conflict of possession and control. IE: a sense of self-lack or fear set in illegitimate or envy or vengeance-driven 'getting' for a special or personal vindication.

Bastard was an illegitimate child - that is not lawfully entitled to inherit. Baseless claim or indeed unlawful claim or act also merits this meaning. Though the usual meaning is 'what I most hate, seen in others' as an expression of denial withholding or rage.

That's as far as I got - but regardless the world and its history of self-fulfilling guilt and fear, I use my perceptions and reactions to reveal myself to me - because the very nature of projection is unconscious or it would not work as a defence against what I haven yet or am not yet accepted as having a correspondence in me. This looking within cannot operate at the same time as a gaslighting or blaming mentality - in perp or victim mode.

#2 (To the main article's themes)

Parasites serve some symbiotic function. This may be said - not always, but for any living thing, I suggest always - whether we are aware of it or not. Nothing and no oneexists in and of itself alone.

I agree self-interest is the underlying principle but that self-definition is key to what at that moment operates to frame perceptions and responses.

The experience of fear or threat will have an effect on the mind of an individual as on a group that can be looked at on many levels ie biology as well as psychology. The reflex would resolve to restore natural rested function, but if the conflict persists, loops or is reset over and again, a condition sometimes called 'amygdala capture' operates as a reptilian brain override for in the focus of a fight-flight reaction all else is subordinated to the 'emergency powers'.

Under intense and extreme conditions, adaptation to a conflict state becomes identity within it. Here are the blocks to the peace from which to release an identity that fears loss of self, face or power as a result of restored Communication. So guilt and guilting aka the blame game operate every kind of manipulative masking deceit to protect the problem, the conflict, the realm of death and taxes - for neither are inherent to our creation are the level of our spirit but pertain to the mortal coil of masking in the body as a distancing and separation from Infinity - which is neither big or small - being edgeless or 'non local' as the locals here use as a more sciency term than anything associated with non-physical perspectives of the past.

But in the Bible as an example, the idea of the Adversary is within a greater 'Plan' or function, as activated in a sleeping Adam, initiated in Job but then restated in fulfilment in NT Jesus. I know the idea of evil get CAPS and generates an identity set over and against as if The Good Guys, but Jesus says resist ye not evil for a very specific warning, namely (in modern terms) what you resist persists, while that which is left unused fades from non use.
Perceived evils feed on emotional reaction, and 'transmit' contagion by resonance to the attempt to eradicate them - which righteously kills all the bastards as a self-vindicating sacrifice - and once started sets the basis of an identity that loves to hate, and so must hate to love, and so can only mask in virtue that it thought to claim in righteousness.
Pausing an instant to check in at the heart is not a technique, but the only way to truly live conscious to our life, for otherwise our conditioned reactions replay or reset our past - which is protected and mutates to ensure no future can 'break in' to relive the trauma that such strategies were set by and learned under.

Excepting that the complex of defences set by lies to conceal against true disclosure ARE a compound of death and taxes - for as you may have wits to see, death is 'unconscious ness' or denial of function to awareness set in the focus of an identity theft, or mis-taken inheritance.

So the masking order disintegrates to the rising of awareness - along with all the suppressed denials, conflicts and grievances, that a surface 'order' pushes beneath the table or gives a blind eye to.

One more point; the attempt to escape from our conflicts without addressing them, operates the 'magical solution' that repackages them into novel forms that effectively redistribute psychic energies such as to determine 'who pays' in a negatively operating pass the parcel of blame, running in a Fabian construct of musical chairs, accelerating under opportunistic orgy of plunder from destruction.

For fungi feeds on dead stuff, without which life would choke on death (as in fact a culture of death does in denial of life). So a willingness to take the feedback of our experience of a world as valid results to an input that also runs under our own radar as subconscious habits or unconscious denials is the willingness of bringing the unconscious to awareness in stead of endlessly sacrificing light and life to a gaslighting complex of defences set very deeply in protection under trauma and self-protected from casual interference - ie surrounded with thorns or guarded by terrors. What is true love but nothing added or taken away?
Notice how in emergency held in presence is guided to only do what is needful and not do what is not required. This is not a moral code, but alignment in energy and purpose.
There is more could unpack from this because a seeming unity can access resources that are unwise to underestimate. Fear driven agenda can access ingenuity that predictively anticipates what you were about to think, but it cannot create, it can only feed off the Creator it must deny in order to seem to exist.

Masking loveless agenda in a mask of virtue set against evils

This comment came up in context of levels of particulates being set as regulatory controls, ostensibly for public health.

The corporately captured use of public health regs for 'social engineering' sets arbitrary biomarkers as parameters by which it determines risk levels, so as to authorise or mandate controls.  This is very evident to anyone able to ask questions, but not at all to those who are effectively controlled by 'experts say'. That there are harmful and toxic pollutions resulting from industrial processes, chemicals and commonly used materials is kept from any real accountability by the promotion of cover stories set as political or medical narratives of virtue and necessity, such as to assign 'infectious disease' as the big scare that takes funding and attention away from unchecked toxic exposures. So note the particulate has no concern at all for composition ie known toxic nanoparticles. Also bio-insecurity is propagandised to induce fearful susceptibility without awareness of the body, and natures means of protection, resilience, and elimination - such as to cancel or mitigate otherwise toxic burdens. That those in positions of wealth and influence should decide to use their means to engineer a 'better world' is hardly a conspiracy, but that the decisions as to what such a world shall be and how it is to be brought about is not via any process of discussion and consent, but principally via mind or narrative controls that set an evil, against which we are induced to act, to sacrifice as social virtue, or be cancelled, excluded or denied lawful freedoms.
The nature of masking loveless agenda in a mask of virtue is to make it difficult to question or criticise without immediately being labelled and outcast as not to be heard but ignored, ridiculed or persecuted.
The nature of choices is always a trading of costs risks and benefits. But the hidden costs are not obvious when the choices are framed in the terms of the sales pitch for a binding contract of exchange. The simplest way to see our predicament is a corporate capture of not only its regulators, but of all social institutions of influence - as 'lock-stepped' into regulatory capture.
Principally via a financial or banking controls that can fund or choke the careers or directions of significant movers, movements or events so as to effectively milk the Many from insider advantage that remodels the law to protect and extend its controls from check, limit or loss. The defence against deceit is not an education as such, as covid reveals, we can be trained not to see or question and be highly educated. It's really a matter of integrity of being, of relationship and communication. A false sense of safety will believe it is safe in being 'virtuous' and so will not want to even look at deceits running in the open.
Nanoparticles are the spearhead of new biological and industrial applications that are largely unregulated, unchecked and tested on the public. But they are also inherently part of biological function. When science discovers - marketising and weaponising take insider pickings. True benefit cant be allowed to upset the gravy train.
But a solid and radiant stove in our house is more than 'heating'!
I can imagine regs for seasoning wood for sale being drafted such as to 'consolidate' the market under corporate control, as well as regs to discourage or frighten off use - ie emission requirements requiring expensive services and random checks and fines.

 

Sketching on the false god of progress

 in response to the themes in:

https://tessa.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-progress

 

The result of a split mind set in lack-driven needs is the masking overlay of a 'surface' mind set in unconsciousness of wholeness, or as a self-consciousness.
So we 'left' the knowing field of Soul awareness to gain a world 'cast out' of unconscious  or masked and distanced conflicts driven to seek meaning, completeness or resolution in externalised terms. Initially symbollic as other, or not me, and increasing stabilising to the perception of a world held in common as an objective framework through which and in which to live under All the king’s horses and all the king’s men - that is imposed order on feared or perceived chaos. The loss of the Golden Age or Old Normal, was catastrophic both psychic & physically - for they are two facets of one that lies hidden to their split.
The first duty of the first Pharaoh was to restore or regain the Golden Age. Antiquity had no concept of progress. Regardless the technological artifice of megalithic works. All was brought forth from within.

The collective focus into the physical as a mask and boundary of possession, became that of being possessed or conditioned to identify in and with. The concept of a closed system is of physical limits and boundaries. Possession and control became the basis for fear of dispossession and loss of control. Thus the original sense of 'solution' to inner conflict, becomes the arena for the expression of the unhealed conflict. Collectivised guilt and conflict drives the illusion of progress in a game of compound debts set in narratives of psychic  redistributions such as to limit and sacrifice to the maintaining of the mindset or system of 'control' against Disclosure to irrevocable guilts or conflicts set in terror that go back to the roots of the Separation experience or 'Fall'.
Our capacity to 'attack or betray' love is set in bodies by which 'separate' minds are 'saved' from what we have made of love, to hide the fragment that remains, and cast out the denial as if to get rid of it. A broken love set in a world stamped by a past made in fear of pain of loss.
That we invoke ingenuity to make home is that our homing signal is filtered and ruled by a 'mindset' of private and socially masking controls. Or through a glass darkly. Yet there IS no substitute for love, no matter what order of lockstepping is contracted under oaths set by terror to join in as a means to excommunicate fear of love, experienced as violation and attack on our collectivised self illusions.
All that we have made or co-created is real to us by the giving of belief to it as our 'answer' in promise of protection or gain, that only ratchets up a loss of awareness of freedom as responsibility within felt living, to conditional 'freedoms' of permission to move IF, WHEN or only as  internalised defences allow.
All attempts to escape our entanglement within our own thinking (given power by reactions set in guilted or masked fear) further ratchet fragmentation in temporary and partial 'relief' or mitigation of disturbance that such thinking is invoked to 'make you safe' from.
To arrive at our starting place and know it for the first time, is a recognition of the power and nature of Creation. As you give, so shall you receive. As we accept to give and live from, so shall we meet. No matter what 'adjustment lenses' are invoked to assert or suffer 'my story'.
The insistence of asserting a 'knowing' set in a past that is not here now, is an active ignorance. From which we may persist reliving our fragment of the past over the relational field of knowing being that we could never leave, defile, break, wound, betray of merit rejection - but in image and concept taken in vain, or a mis-taken inheritance run off with as a means for getting from a father/motherless sense of lack. Where the very nature of life is for giving and receiving one meaning in infinitely rich and always new movement within one without a second. Timelessness is not when time ends, but when our use of time for diversion, obfuscation and delay is released to the revealing of the timeless through a 're-purposed' self, world and abilities or talents. True Inherence is radiance of fullness that gives of itself. The virtues or qualities of life are unselfconscious joy. Our attempts to get these for our 'self' possession and control are our own act of dispossession. and pointers to learn how to not get in our own way. But to trust and align in a way to embraces us as relationally whole. To undo the past in the presence that expands future potential from connected or felt being. This is not what our minds are trained to accept, see or allow. Nor can it be brought into such a mind/world but is misperceived and subverted to mask in as 'solutions' that protect the problem as managed conflict.
For without the 'conflict' the ego of denial and attack, masking in justified defence, has no role or function. It will then seek any and every way to restore its 'normal' so as to recharge the machine of getting for scarcity, pain and death made sacred by sacrifice. Tis a false god that promises to 'deliver' but locks the premises once false profits are followed to indebted slavery masking as permission to live-on the back of othered sacrifice we think to boost our lot against...
The God Idea holds Word or Idea as Creative in the Mind of One without a second.
For ideas do not leave the mind that holds them, and we do not create awareness of existing, but receive as freedom to extend the gift. Go forth and multiply is the nature of Idea as projection or extension of Mind without edge or limit, but that we hold through the giving and receiving of qualities given form of expression.
The use of projection to 'get rid of' a hate or horror, splits a mind to levels and compartments. To know not what it does. Unconsciousness as an 'answer' to fear of pain of loss.  Abnegation of will, to a sense of life as conflict-overwhelm. Dispiriting retreat to an externalised 'responsibility' of systemic subjection under defences against  uncovering you to yourself.
If you would rather be right than happy, then judgemental lockdown will see even the little that it hath, taken away, but assert 'happiness' in triumph of being proved right over life judged, denied and cast in sacrifice to dead thinking given priority.
If opening to that we may be mistaken, is the spark of a willingness to question the reality or the beliefs that are setting our perception and range of response to our life.
To not insist on knowing allows a knowing field to guide, inform and transform our mind.
As this becomes a pathway of conscious choice we grow a new place from which to be, rather than 'new solutions' that mask as loving while concealing the fear of hate that is held to hurt and be hurt, that we hold onto as both survival and masked agenda of manipulation.
Progress is moving forward or unfolding of fruits to held purpose.
But a god of progress is set in the hatred of life now. As is, as we are. You could call it judgement, but its lovelessness is blind to truth - except it can leverage or use to boost its sale pitch.
The mind can wander in its own drift, to become its own mis-taken adversary or oppositional conflict. We learn by living our results to release what no longer serves who we are and accept to be now. This is not a linear progression for getting or getting rid of as an externalised pet project.
But of course our experience can and does serve a greater purpose that what we think alone, because there is no thinking alone and apart, no matter how many deny communication as contagion to be stamped out.

 

 in response to the themes in this comment on 'science':

https://tessa.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-progress/comment/10617720

The mythic history of institutional science is well hidden, in the way that the mind ingeniously hides in backstory as predicate that frames its results to self-reinforce.
The myth of rational control - set over and apart form the life it predictively defines, is a house of cards that has to seek cover story by which to evade disclosure to false foundations or lack of substance in what are taken as such.
Technologism splits to 'what works' and leaves scientism to peddle the myth or story by which to feed and control its captive revenue stream.

Research is expert in finding a need for further research.
The giants (Newton was very active in self-seeking that readily denied his sources as well as stealing credit from rivals). Politics was and is the context in which human beings think, live and work - in its broader sense of recognition, support, funding, status or rank, possession and control.

A scientist to be honest must do his utmost to prove his conjecture or theory wrong.
As in Pollack's Forth Phase of Water (an excellent book for both content and the exposition of the process of its discoveries and implications).

So where is the control experiment to prove the 'cytopathic' effect is in fact an 'infection' by a 'virus' and not the result of starving (withholding foetal bovine serum) and poisoning (adding antibiotics to) an in virto 'cell culture'  - WITHOUT the adding of the indeterminate soup assumed to contain 'viruses'.

"Experts Say" is become the mainstream sales pitch of the $cience™.
But within institutional science is the politics of power. Enders did not claim to have proved measles virus. His finding left many questions open. But after receiving a Nobel for unrelated work, his word took on a different status, and self-interest aligned to 'opportunism' given authority. This pattern is normal as the tension between institutional authority or establishment, and the freedom to question, explore and call anomaly out.
The messengers of truth's revealing are denied or killed by the 'tenant landlords' who take their own authority by possessing the means to enforce it.

The anti-psychic predicate of what science as technologism is thus 'whatever works' to serve identity complex founded on such a predicate.
It was not wrong to undo a split sense of vitalism from mechanism, but it is wrong to assume mechanism 'dead' matter in motion, as a result of dead thinking.
There IS no actual capacity to separate from the life you would study, but there is our capacity to create models of some facets to run as a short cut to trial and error, but then as a short-circuit to direct inspiration (which remains a vital part of the scientific 'discovery'). A autistic mindset cannot or will not feel its way. Selfism, in the sense of assuming or wishing autonomy, works a denial or downplaying of the field of relation to seem to predict and control our own image or model of reality - and migrate there!

What you give worth-ship to, you share and strengthen by sharing. This is cultural value, and can be assigned to false with-ness or mistaken or misguided perception-responses.

The accumulated 'body of knowledge' is as full of fraud and fallacy as the Banking system is full of toxic debt. But its collapse is its lack of true foundation - IT CANNOT REALLY WORK! - but seeming to work can be stretched out at great cost of sacrifice of living to prop up the dead. Technologism resorts to 'applied psychology' of the breakdown of the human mind to remake it as a tool of the system.

I realise I might seem to be having a go at you. I see a lot of value in what you wrote - but framed in a way that runs everything backwards.
Glory is in the felt quality of Behold I make all things new!
But your novel pops up as a resource to plunder, to suck dry and set in a glorious body of knowledge? Huh?

Science as a 'body of knowledge' worshipped as authority becomes self-boosting against correction. Of course this is unworkable, hence the denial of awareness as the groupthink by which to no longer be accountable to an underclass of slave-minds who can do all the science they want in the narratively framed focus provided and funded.

Science as legitimate and honest enquiry is integral to our capacity to question and recognise answer in kind.
And WHO told you you were naked? (Assigned to the Lord), is the movement of awareness to the questioning of a masking reality, or what we might now call masking beliefs, assumptions of mutually reinforcing definitions.
We use tools or become tooled by them. This calls for conscious discernment and discrimination, or else an identity asleep in such assumptions supports the tooling of living beings to programmed outcomes of unconscious bias - set in inner conflicts that are socially masked out.

Opening the Book on Gain of Function Research

 https://viroliegy.com/2022/11/18/closing-the-book-on-gain-of-fiction-with-dr-tom-cowan/comment-page-1/

 

A war mind seeks gain of function from anything and everything.
When it became apparent that biological ie germ or virus based weapons failed to work, the switch to toxic agents or radiative exposures  that could pass off as an 'infection' and be 'leveraged' by crafted or planted hype, the ability to run the 'biological weapon research' as plausible defence against Others using 'pathogenic' weapons maintained COVER for 'dark research' without the normal checks and balances of accountability to law, under pretext of national (or global) security. IE as a masked agenda that also spins off viotech corporations offering 'solutions' to fears cast to or flagged as 'contagious'.
The GoF for a destructive agenda working for plunder and control worked from the fear and belief in contagious and deadly pathogens cannot be underestimated. So look past the cheap satisfaction of 'disproving' but one facet of a mindset that IS a masked agenda wreaking sickness, pain, loss and death under 'medical' functions.

The ego, of a self taken in image, masked and distanced for its survival runs GoF as its survival. That is it seeks to assign to itself attributes that boost its sense of self - as well as divert the negatives of such a usurping as guilting of others, so as to gain from another's loss.
What is our true function as wholeness but joy in being?
What is the usurping (dys) function of a split sense of self but to mask over the split so as to present a face of control that passes off as real to others, so as to avoid conflicts, and also to operate secret thought and intent behind a social mask.

Unless the underlying context is taken into account the 'modelling' of our thought assumes self-interest to align in a common good. But which 'self' is actually being asserted and protected?

A sense of self-conflict can drive fear of fear to seek a comfortable definition or diagnosis by which to be 'made safe' in thought, regardless being hindered from healing or even poisoned and killed under standard of care.

An example is the bio-genetic research using 'virological narrative model' as its justification for developing applications to 'transfect' synthetic proteins into living cells. That the virus narrative is unfounded doesn't stop the development of its shift from real but unfounf agents to to a genetically defined construct from which every kind of spinoff can be 'developed' out of Rorschach blot experimentation - not just as the marketing of 'genetics' but the intent and attempt to create a man-made hack using hydrogels, nano tech and RF. GoF is the seedbed for this 'development'.
Again - regardless of whether ANY of it actually works is secondary to hyping investment, directing research and using it to launch platforms through which to manage or feed from a captive revenue stream. By the time the damage shows up, others are left holding the can, or an other variation of deceit  is generated to divert and capture attention.

Solipsism; Are you the dreamer of your own dream?

John Carter

Solipsism: From the perspective of the EGO, there is NOTHING else. No other minds, nothing outside itself. It is GOD and SELF. That should be the true definition of Solipsism - to include EGO as the point of view.

 

 Hang on! ...There is a sense of being excluded or deprived that drives it to get it for itself and be seen by others to have it. The ego is the belief in a separate mind, which by definition is othered or distanced from 'othered' mind, or 'world-mind'. Compartmentalised meanings that all reflect back witnesses to being alone and apart. If solipsism was taken to Mind rather than self-thinking- alone, it would find no self apart but only relational exchange, and so would recoil from Infinity to get its normal back ;-)

 

The ego sense of wanting to "belong" and "be seen/appreciated" is the ego insisting on being revered. But, since it considers "out there" to be the same as "in here" (what is portrayed on the canvas/dashboard is the only reality), then it can only be revered by itself. It amounts to the ego proclaiming that it is "that" which created "all that is" and then insisting on an approving audience that is "other." Wait! That sounds an awful lot like the God of the Old Testament.

 

There is a critical difference; God knows all in one and one in all. This is to truly know and be known. Only apparent separation generates longing from a love that needed no name until replaced by imaged symbol (ego). The substitution for Reality runs a fragmented or distanced and masked version as attack on God. (Ego) running unconscious - hence your narcissistic sketch. Beneath appearances is the true unconscious wellspring of a Creation that is at the same 'time' superconscious. That is to say it's Life Jim, but not as we know it.
We are not self-creating, but the illusion of such a self-world runs in its own mythic prequel - that is we create the past (or father) that supports and justifies our currently accepted self-acceptance or assertion. Our Mythic consciousness of Self, God & World underlies our narrative identity–not as a fixed template but as a transformable 'structure' or complex of acquired and inherited definitions and beliefs - most of which are unconscious or masked.

Mis-taking illusion true & defending it

in response to the themes in:

https://viroliegy.com/2022/10/31/the-chemical-structure-of-antibodies/?replytocom=6834#respond 

 To fail to discriminate an imagined model and the reality to which and in which it is applied is to mistake illusion for truth. To persist in self-illusion in place of truth and set over against it, is the lie and the father of it, for a wish is held that reality be different than it is and the mind is set to react as if such were in fact true.
Truth is no more the domain of science, than health the domain of medicine.
Yet logic serves any experience of accepted active self identification and release of false or limiting perspectives, as the developing consciousness. Sowing and reaping is no less a logic than garbage in; garbage out.

That we can sow and reap misery is in our capacity to turn a blind eye to an act of withholding or withdrawal from a true relational communication, to engage in private or self-adjusted 'realities' of social and personal masking, set over and against our reality, framed by masking beliefs as threat and enemy to deeply invested and defended identity. For the miser gives not of himself but grudgingly from a mind set in grievance over fears of pain of loss.

So what of our philosophical and scientific models, that have consolidated to  utilitarian technologism by which the 'user' becomes the utility to its own system, and the model the basis from which living sacrifice is exacted to 'save' its appearance as the asserted and necessary reality - instead of a true feedback or appearances or symptoms by which to address and undo fallacies that set conflict, pain, sickness and loss as defaults from which to 'build back from'?

The truth of anything is not in itself, but in the purpose to which it is being used or serving. Clearly we say one thing while doing another and so the honest evaluation of our current results, is our check against self-deceptions set in mutually reinforcing emotion or identity-backed reactions,

The notion of infinity particles aligning to love has to recognise Infinity as Self-extending, and love as unifying coherence of integral resonance or wave function' - such as was held to be the nature of the aether.

At the heart is our focus in and of infinity. Awareness as existence un-thinged or un-thought. But the movie of a masking mind runs as if a reality-experience to which we are subjected, thrilled and killed by. The psychic-emotional underpinnings of our experience-results are kept hidden by the driven intent to resolve deeper conflict in a surface of symptoms flagged as 'powers' unto themselves. As reflecting a wish or belief to be a power unto our self.
There Is true Context of which we are integrally in and of.

There is freedom to create or think experience of, excepting this, what we are actively accepting, sets the basis and range for what can unfold therefrom.
But while we focus in our appearances as fact, we are not aware of the thought that literally creates our perceptions and responses.

I generally write to bridge this apparent divide - bringing in psychic/spiritual responsibility as well as philosophical perspective. The cult I see growing is base on 'you are being lied to!' or 'Everything is a lie!" - as if THAT in itself confers some kind of virtue of moral superiority!.
A lie passes OFF as true. There are no counterfeit 11 dollar bills. Love of truth is not shared by gnawing on a bone of lies, or endless rabbit holes that arrive where they began but as illusions of being more 'awake' because we have studied the 'arts of the enemy'. Yet only love of true CAN in truth share anything. So regardless all evidences, the truth of love reveals beneath appearances through the undoing of what temporarily passes off as true to a limited and limiting understanding and appreciation.

Mis-taken inheritance as template. The undoing of genetic dogma

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/ 

Glad to see this here!

The foundation of science was in a sense hijacked way back before it globalised.

I say in a sense, because a true foundation is only obscured and substituted for by a false.

That there IS a true foundation for awareness and appreciation of life is always distorted filtered or ruled out - ie denied - by the wish that something else by true because we think to WANT it so. Or from such an invested stake want NOT to be true if it 'threatens' our possessive controls under permission of the false.

This is not to automatically assert that Torsten or Stefan are necessarily true in all they say, but that they witness to truth by their willingness to question and seek verification of funded and securitised narratives running protection for stakeholders to vested interests that would set communication out of boundsso as to rule from a black box, a dark op, a Notional Security Interest, a Private Keep Out!, a no user access sealed unit.

The stamping out of a templated 'mind' or reality is a way of seeing acquired inheritance, where fear set controls boot up to replicate an operating system that resets itself whenever the light starts to come into the mind, so as to run on gaslight.

Within the matrix of such thinking, there is no way to communicate to others, because communication has been weaponised or repurposed to prevent moving without permission. But Communication is our true foundation regardless the mind-hijack, and is restored by the willingness to put down such a 'mind', to receive of truth anew. Always anew - lest a template runs the golem blind to the life that can be painfully awake to unresolved fears grievance or conflicts, and so address them truly, instead of repackaging toxic debt to complex instruments to mask as 'virtue' to trade in as outsourcing risk of pain, but also abnegating responsibility for life to such 'systemic ingenuity'.

Inheritance can be mis-taken and run as Garbage in; garbage out.

True Inherence is then seen as threat to the garbage recycling syndrome playing musical chairs while passing the toxic parcel. But truth is not destructive to who and what you are, only the lie is threatened. And truth is thus not IN the world we templated from a mistaken premis - but leads us from our deeply invested reactions in its dogma - which is backwards, for your thinking does not create the creator of thought, even if it can spin out a yarn and buy into its own image.

Uncovering the Biofield offers a living embrace or our world in a new light, but our first reaction is to seek to hack and attack it. Or rather, that is the template that runs without a fresh and current connection to the field of relational communication.

In tangent I read this today:

The view of Carolyn Merchant, in The Death of Nature (1982, p283) was as follows. Leibniz stressed that there was a life and perception animating all things and criticised the new philosophy for ‘maintaining the inertness and deadness of things’. For Leibniz, the world of substance was really organic, with every being in the universe, from living animals down to the simple monad, alive and composed of living parts. ‘Thus there is nothing fallow, sterile or dead in the universe,’ he wrote. ‘All matter,’ he said, ‘must be full of animated, or at least living, substances.’ He could never reconcile himself with the atoms-and-the-void philosophy emanating from England. He coined the word ‘dynamics’, which concept was for him part of a large system of things. His philosophy was a dynamic vitalism, representing a last gasp of vitalistic thinking before the advent of the mechanical, corpuscular philosophy which swept all before it in the eighteenth century.

Thing-based systems are closed. Living systems are an exchange of open and closed. Our thing-king cannot grasp this. There is no thing-in-itself but as a conceptual model of temporary imagination. At the same time we are an unfolding experience of creative thought and feeling made tangible - even if the creative is currently assigned or masked to a template of object continuity or 'space-time.

Got it off my chest?

in response to the themes in:

https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/china-takes-booms-advice-goes-in/

 

 A downside of seeing 'conspiracy' of control agenda is becoming defined by reaction. Which could be seen as the most potent aspect of a control agenda!
However, I cant read of the global situation without a sense of a world being 'reconditioned and restructured' by orchestrated applications of fear, guilting, and false solutions, as a complex of carrot and stick running rats in a lab maze.
This winter looks to be a significant turn of the screw in terms of applied torture techniques set onto social scales. Good Cop is waiting in the wings when we are taken to breaking point.
All for our own good of course! Well for human 2.0 if indeed that remains human or some kind of golem.
Funded and securitised narratives operate the minds in which most everyone 'thinks'. Choking sustenance or supply to any other perspective is its 'creative' power by which to make life in image to which the living must sacrifice?
The willingness to sacrifice life for lies is the sustenance and supply to a 'control agenda'. Thus the giving to Caesar will choke dues to God and vice versa. You have to discern my reference to 'God' in a living sense for yourself or run dead thinking and be-live your result! Love cares not our 'belief system' but that it truly serves life and the living in practice.

Have a good day!

All aligns to self interest, but what aligns our currently accepted definition of self?

in response to the themes in:

https://sebastienpowell.substack.com/p/checkpoint-charlie

 

 All aligns to self interest, but what aligns our currently accepted definition of self, from which our perceptions of other and world is derived?
A mis taken self image must result in conflicted self interests that then mask to unify off as a self presentation set against externalised conflicts - ie projected to scapegoat or blame as justifiction for attack. Accepting false premise, following false profits, to go forth and multiply conflict and debt running toxic, as a negatively polarised sense of survival set in distancing, masking and attack while asserting virtue or moral necessity. Such a mindset runs contagion by reaction in minds already invested as stakeholders to fear set as control over life seen through dead eyes.
The world we perceive & respond is not primary, independent or creative cause to the true nature of a living Universe regardless our capacity to distance, mask and attack our own source and nature in the lockstepping agreement to lockdown to the body in a world of bodies set in conflict, struggle, sickness and death.
When fear is given power to 'create' in our mind, as our power of protection, its thinking is taken as our own. The fundamental poison or contagion is fear, but pretending it is not already active as conditioned, internalised and normalised habit is simply further self-deceit - such as to make cover story for masking over active harms to push conflicts out of awareness by diversion and dissociation.  While fear of fear simply feeds or inflames the dispossession of our true awareness and right mind. So undoing errors set in protective deceits is needful from wherever we currently align integrity of being, but the pattern of such is systemic to all such instances, and so it the root error from which all proceeds.
For many reading here, the covid op reveals the capacity of the collective mind to set itself in an active and protected unreality by reaction to false evidence appearing real. This principle is not limited to covid or any facet of its mutating narrative identities running covert or hidden as masked agenda, dark op or manipulative evil mind.
So WHO told us we were naked? - in the sense of defenceless, susceptible, threatened, attacked, deceived, and set in self-doubt, division, and driven to act out in the shape of our fears?
Questioning our reactions, our  interpretive perceptions, the underlying beliefs and our acquired conditioning or masking survival strategy set to limit and control the life we could not cope with or be equal to in our past, is a decision to open, align and restore our true presence now, as a grounded reference point - without which we are lost in the negative results of our own fear - and perhaps we no longer wish to hide this from ourselves or each other in social masking evasions that distort our relational communications and appreciations of shared worth and value - that is known by living rather than set by social credits to offset guilt-narratives, as 'permission to live' under fear.

The use to which we put our mind

 in response to the themes in a thread on Viroliegy which like millions of others, diverted into personal trading of right over wrong, such as to shift from issues to moral judgements masking as reasoned or righteous claim. Within which was the idea of history as lies, periodically erased or reset...

 

A lot of this is the way the mind works.
If we understood how mind works we wouldn't need someone else to blame for anything.
Grievance rises from denial and deprivation. But we are unaware for the most part of denials arising from a selective focus.
A spotlight conceals more than it reveals.
While the story 'works' for what we want, we gladly turn a blind eye to witnesses to its nature as a chosen self-illusion.
Like children suckling that which supports their sense of self-autonomy.
Become enraged when it is taken away.
But in human experience I am talking of a sense of fundamental betrayal of the life we wanted or thought to have, and be-lived real.

The virus theory says a lot about our use of the mind, as does all our modelling. In a video of Kastrup and Vernon yesterday it was put that Galileo's 'sin' was not the heliocentric model (which goes back to the Greeks) but asserting it was (THE) Reality, rather than our map or model of representative appearances that reflect our mind - or rather our use of Mind, by which we 'see' through a glass darkly' or in modern terms through a lens of false narrative identity.

Consider the use to which we put the past.
Can you?
A narrative or mythic identity generates its own prequel or backstory as a basis for exploring experience as an unfolding of meanings.
What we then choose to remember or forget is a function of our active focus - which for many, defaults to a subsconscious illusion of self-autonomy.
Is this not the same as a wish to be unconscious rather than address the pain of conflicted predicates? Does this not 'automatically' find pathways and witnesses or proxy conflicts by which to reset some version of 'Private, do not disturb!'.

Deconstructing false narratives in the light of a love of truth, is a world apart from debunking others so as to boost a sense of being right by painting it so.
My sense of the deceiver is that it loves 'You are being lied to' or 'everything you have been told is a lie', because that ensures the reset of gaslighting as the guide. A shift of perspective allows recognising truth is always revealing, but we didn't want to see it, because we wanted to see something else.

"Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice shame on me" is a call to self-responsibility for our OWN. & for our knowing. For false knowledge phishes our mind as a belief thief steals identity - in concept if not in truth. Yet that is part of how we learn to discern in place of identity boosting for a self & world set by sacrifice of wholeness to seek somewhere 'else' and be-live our result.

Questioning our reality; watching our thought

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/05/believe-it-or-not/

 

Questioning our reality – as a desire to be true founded rather than ruled by deceit – which is the same as desire to heal rather than hurt – must question our beliefs about it. For we only have an experience reality through an interpretive ‘consciousness’ of definitions or beliefs.

Clearly we cannot Really question, align or heal our beliefs from any particular belief or identity and worldview already accepted. Else the circular reasoning seeks and finds only as its internalised rules and filters dictate.

So the first recognition of a mind and world of lies is the need to choose not to use it.
Put the mind down. relax, be still and let being move you.

This can be short-circuited by the projection of the hate of pain set in grievance OUT as blame, onto Other, to World and to shifting targets or scapegoats in the world, whose shadow is then seen in all who don’t see as you.

Watching our thought in the act, is no longer choosing to fall or focus in its use as our own narrative adjustment or boosting of identity. Not living in our own movie as a mask or adjustment layer over living relationships, recognised or as yet to be revealed.

Therefore meeting ideas that evoke emotional reaction in any situation, is also looking within, at the same instant as looking out to form and appearances. Looking within is then discernment within life, in place of a ruleset of comparative judgements based on an inherited or acquired adaptation to a world you are now at least not entirely asleep in.

The factioning of beliefs set in narrative identity operates an exclusion zone to awareness rising from peace that your dramatic attachments rightly sense to be threat, or rather the undoing of your allegiance and support, without which the story is dropped or repurposed to a call for connection in place of a call for distancing, masking, denial and attack – set of course as virtue.

Until we recognise the signature patterns, we are taken by the same game in a different form. Hence the lie and the father of it is a shapeshifting deceit, but lockstepped at the level of image and form, or appearances running as if built-in meanings.

The meaning you give to your relationships and world is the measure you set and receive.
The meaning arising from wholeness as of an uncarved block can be shaped by your thought and desire, but taking or making novel ‘meanings’ out of any true relational context, as mutually agreed currency, sets a path of separation from peace and power at heart, to tip into conflicts persisted in as invested treasure. Such that the maker of his dream is subjected by it as against his will. Or as if a mind can be trapped or even attacked by its own thought. Only in concept can thoughts separate from their source. yet by such means are we phished by reaction to give fear power by belief. And then seek to limit terror in masking beliefs to offset the pain. Albeit by getting rid of blame to anywhere or anyone else as ‘survival’ under masked terror.

Masking is where fear sets us in guilt of a fundamental disintegrity.
Choosing not to invest in guilt or blame must discern responsibility where it is, and release it from where it isnt. But unless we uncover the thinking that runs a fear and guilt operating system, we will act within its terms as the reinforcement for mind set in being right – set against a wrong.

Do we become what we hate?

in response to the themes in:

 https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/03/watch-simple-sabotage-solutionswatch/

 

 

As long as we think in terms of war, the underlying sense of self-lack set in fear and guilt will never rise to awareness or healing, but always be repackaged as blame-hate and attack or denial. Yet even with this is the capacity to seek and set order against a chaos-as yet unable to be more truly discerned to a higher or more embracing order than set by masking orders in which to contest, redistribute or collectivise sacrifice.

The seeking for obstacle or enemy outside is the mindset and narrative justifictions for 'eradicating' whatever flagged threat or scapegoat for guilt and penalty can be displaced to.

This is not to say there is no call to meet lawlessness with an embodiment of lawful with-ness and worth-ship, else we play doormat for abuse.

The saying assigned to Jesus of 'resist ye not evil' could be taken to mean passivity in the face of abuse, false witness and socially masked blame-hate. But nothing in the story of Jesus supports that excepting if the Cross is interpreted as sacrifice to sin instead of sacrifice of the mind from which sin and sacrifice arise in place of love's with-ness and worth-ship.

What we resist, persists - is not obvious as appearances, but is revealed to operate by stealth. If we take or boost an identity of self-lack and division by 'righteous war of hate made 'holy' by War on perceived and believed 'evil' (whatever hated or feared evil), then we become secret worshippers of the thing we say we hate or even die hating, for it would make us 'right' by the sacrifice of the wrong. If you don't get the pattern that pervades our collective thinking, you are not paying attention!

A wrong or error does call for correction and healing, but not for hate-driven vengeance– nor for a blind justice by which to 'resume or reset a normal' by which fallacy is protected because it 'protects' its stakeholders.

The yielding of our 'thinking' or conditioned reactions of personal, family and social survival, is not surrender to an 'other' but to the currency and presence of our very being - otherwise masked out by drama of driven distraction (for which the world we know was invoked to maintain).

Translation of weaponised and marketised language of a false possession (or indeed, dispossession of true appreciation lived and shared), is not undermining or sabotage of the capacity to stand and live from an integrity of being in our endeavours, but of the capacity to self-sabotage our very nature in Communication and Relationship, such as to react from a sense of self-lack, distanced, masked and tooled for attack.

So there will seem to be a war of epic proportions such as to divert attention NOW to such defences and solutions as can buy time...against truth corrupted and feared by the guilt that must accompany or underlie the wilful attack of our own hate in another, or the wilful gratification of fantasies of power acted out upon the body or the bodies of others.

Once you recognise the pattern of the lie and the father of it, yu no longer need follow the rabbit-holes to smell the rat of DANGER! LOOK! THIS WAY! NOW - OR ELSE!

The nature of charged conditions in motion is of the transmission or transference of energetic states or patterns of giving and receiving. If attending the quality and capacity of our energy or connection to life we can see immediately what does not serve and we cannot afford, IF we value connection to life above a conditioned preference or habit. This keenness of awareness is perhaps first found under the conditions that can no longer be fudged, masked over or denied - lest we be denied of our life and will.

Until we accept a whole decision, we will be conflicted in what we want, and meet conflicted or self-sabotaging situations in our day, our kitchen, & our World.

So to know who you are is to receive it of That which does in place of seeking to set or make yourself in your own image or thought and warring to make its so.

Give unto Ceasar what is due unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar, and give unto God all that is due unto God.

I know the word God has been abused almost as much as the love that created us (if not the conditioning of a world set by and masking over trauma). But Caesar is symbolic of powers in the world, and God is power the mind in the world thinks to have grasped or become possessed by. The call is for discernment within life at the heart. Not for a rulebound reaction in groupthink - regardless of apparent 'sides'.

For those who must 'fight', take no joy in war, and side with freedom until you recognise it is your embodiment of freedom that calls you not to give up and die! Or die to hate while still alive.

Beneath the complex of masking defences is a mis-taken identity

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/10/28/the-butterfly-monologues/

 

People as living beings or people as personae? - makes all the difference.
A quantised belief and perception will classify or order according to selected and weighted characteristics. Who decides? Contest for narrative becomes the 'official' reality, regardless that even this will be seen and used differently at different times by different people.

That human thinking makes images, models or constructs of the world and becomes invested in them as a stakeholder by dint of emotionally invested reaction and thus identity. These are internalised by social reinforcement or tacit mutual agreements to become 'normals' for families' groups  or ideologically set identities.

But that doesn't mean we create reality, but that we cocreate our personal (and collectively contexted) experience of reality. The current reversals arise from lockdown in imaged modelling or narrative led identity, set against true or open and honest relational being and exchange.
Change is the nature of a quantised or object reality, yet there are qualities that are revealed and shared within our experience or world that are timeless yet not static or fixed to others, objects or situations.

That images can be changed is a remake, or a reshuffle or repackaged redistribution of psychic energies, that may seen to partially resolve an issue by reframed narratives. In this way the 'saviour' doesn't recognise the tyrant that shifted to mask in 'helping or saving others'.
But such archetypes are patterns of strategy for a protected self-illusion of conflict against exposure, in which victim and perpetrator shift within a fragmented or split mind that only accounts for what its filters and rules permit into awareness.

The thinking by which a mind is split to a false sense of private individuality or self-authorising automata cannot be the thinking that reveals or releases subconscious programming to recognise reality at heart. The holographic nature of consciousness is more of a 'field' than a quantum domain - yet a field only evidences through interference and resonance patterns - such as we both are and share in as the extension of life as gift.

Attempts or intent to coerce life meet a like reflection. We have 'created' a world of reactive conflicts projected or cast out to 'world'. But like with parables of wishing, the results were not recognised at the time of the wish. True willing is not coercive on self or others. But while we are phished by a mis-taken identity, a false operates in our name and as our own thinking.

Questioning our reality is for when we meet a conflict or dissonance of masked conflict so as to -as far as we may - check in at the heart, before engaging in reaction or response, which doesn't have to be framed by the 'meanings' being assumed or asserted by our own or another's thought or behaviours.

The defining of the 'problem' is where a conflict is often masked over and cast or leaks into diversions, scapegoats or obfuscations. So learning to question the apparently self-evident 'meanings' back to felt qualities, will uncover better ways to frame the questions that reveal where the problem can be immediately addressed within the sphere of who we are and are responsible for in terms of giving and receiving, learning and teaching. This will become clearer as we recognise and release what we are not or where the 'problem' is not truly defined or addressed.

Conflict set the 'human condition' that is also human conditioning. Awareness is the condition in which conflicted decisions can be resolved.  Everything else buys time against an inevitable. The more protected a conflict, the more fearful, terrible and hateful it becomes until 'too big to fail' locks in as a death spiral. But beneath the complex of masking defences set by fear & protected by misplaced sympathies, is a mis-taken identity.

In any instant of a true receiving and sharing of life is a reminder to who and what you are. Willingness for this will starve the wilful driven or compulsive problem-driven defence system. This also opens better ways to protect all that is true, in place of being phished or triggered to react to  appearances that have resonance to our hopes and fears.

While not focused in the world as we each meet it, the fact is that whatever we do or choose not to do, we do it within a context of purpose. Bringing purpose conscious is not served by focusing on what we don't want or hate - so as to renew or 'boost' an identity set in seeking some other moment rather than living from an embrace or willingness of felt and shared worth.

The use of evil as a means to gain an identity set in opposition can claim "War on Evil' as a moral  superiority, but is covertly dependent on the the thing it hates or seeks to eradicate to maintain allegiance or employment as protector and guide. Thus it uses fear to...make you safe from fear. While this is kept from awareness it seems to protect or hold order. As the mask over fear breaks down, its appeal as power and protection fades to the willingness to meet or question the fear, which is a transformative experience that is in fact being facilitated by the conditions otherwise perceived in expectations or pain and loss as the stamp of past trauma on the presence that rises of itself, because but for a welcome, it has never truly left you.