Mis-taken inheritance as template. The undoing of genetic dogma

in response to the themes in:

https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/ 

Glad to see this here!

The foundation of science was in a sense hijacked way back before it globalised.

I say in a sense, because a true foundation is only obscured and substituted for by a false.

That there IS a true foundation for awareness and appreciation of life is always distorted filtered or ruled out - ie denied - by the wish that something else by true because we think to WANT it so. Or from such an invested stake want NOT to be true if it 'threatens' our possessive controls under permission of the false.

This is not to automatically assert that Torsten or Stefan are necessarily true in all they say, but that they witness to truth by their willingness to question and seek verification of funded and securitised narratives running protection for stakeholders to vested interests that would set communication out of boundsso as to rule from a black box, a dark op, a Notional Security Interest, a Private Keep Out!, a no user access sealed unit.

The stamping out of a templated 'mind' or reality is a way of seeing acquired inheritance, where fear set controls boot up to replicate an operating system that resets itself whenever the light starts to come into the mind, so as to run on gaslight.

Within the matrix of such thinking, there is no way to communicate to others, because communication has been weaponised or repurposed to prevent moving without permission. But Communication is our true foundation regardless the mind-hijack, and is restored by the willingness to put down such a 'mind', to receive of truth anew. Always anew - lest a template runs the golem blind to the life that can be painfully awake to unresolved fears grievance or conflicts, and so address them truly, instead of repackaging toxic debt to complex instruments to mask as 'virtue' to trade in as outsourcing risk of pain, but also abnegating responsibility for life to such 'systemic ingenuity'.

Inheritance can be mis-taken and run as Garbage in; garbage out.

True Inherence is then seen as threat to the garbage recycling syndrome playing musical chairs while passing the toxic parcel. But truth is not destructive to who and what you are, only the lie is threatened. And truth is thus not IN the world we templated from a mistaken premis - but leads us from our deeply invested reactions in its dogma - which is backwards, for your thinking does not create the creator of thought, even if it can spin out a yarn and buy into its own image.

Uncovering the Biofield offers a living embrace or our world in a new light, but our first reaction is to seek to hack and attack it. Or rather, that is the template that runs without a fresh and current connection to the field of relational communication.

In tangent I read this today:

The view of Carolyn Merchant, in The Death of Nature (1982, p283) was as follows. Leibniz stressed that there was a life and perception animating all things and criticised the new philosophy for ‘maintaining the inertness and deadness of things’. For Leibniz, the world of substance was really organic, with every being in the universe, from living animals down to the simple monad, alive and composed of living parts. ‘Thus there is nothing fallow, sterile or dead in the universe,’ he wrote. ‘All matter,’ he said, ‘must be full of animated, or at least living, substances.’ He could never reconcile himself with the atoms-and-the-void philosophy emanating from England. He coined the word ‘dynamics’, which concept was for him part of a large system of things. His philosophy was a dynamic vitalism, representing a last gasp of vitalistic thinking before the advent of the mechanical, corpuscular philosophy which swept all before it in the eighteenth century.

Thing-based systems are closed. Living systems are an exchange of open and closed. Our thing-king cannot grasp this. There is no thing-in-itself but as a conceptual model of temporary imagination. At the same time we are an unfolding experience of creative thought and feeling made tangible - even if the creative is currently assigned or masked to a template of object continuity or 'space-time.